The present invention relates to a control method and, more particularly, to a control method capable of preventing a motor from damage.
As shown in
If the boundary between the N pole 121 and an S pole 122 is positioned near the senor 16 when the rotor 12 stops, the sensor 16 detects the N pole 121 first and the polarity of the iron core 101 is changed to north and the rotor 12 rotates clockwise when the motor restarts. As shown in
The number of boundaries between the N and S poles depends on the number of the N poles or S poles. In
Motors and control methods thereof are provided. An exemplary embodiment of a motor comprises a stator and a rotor. The rotor has a plurality of north poles and south poles alternatively arranged in a circle. An exemplary embodiment of a method for motor control comprises: providing a first sensor and a second sensor on the stator in a manner that prevents the first and second sensors from simultaneously detecting boundaries between the north and south poles during rotation of the rotor; determining a first duration; sending out a first signal when the first sensor detects any one of the north poles during the rotation of the rotor and a second signal when the first sensor detects any one of the south poles; sending out a third signal when the second sensor detects any one of the north poles during the rotation of the rotor, and a fourth signal when the second sensor detects any one of the south poles; and shutting off the motor if the first, second, third or fourth signals are continuously transmitted longer than the first duration.
Some embodiments of a motor comprise a rotor, a stator, a first sensor, a second sensor and a processor. The rotor has a plurality of north poles and south poles, the first sensor is disposed on the stator, and the second sensor is disposed on the stator and separated from the first sensor by an appropriate distance. The processor receives signals from the first and second sensors. The first sensor and the second sensor are disposed on the stator in a manner that the first and second sensors never simultaneously detect boundaries between the north and south poles during rotation of the rotor.
Further scope of the applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus axe not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
a is a signal diagram of a sensor representing a conventional motor in a normal condition;
b is a signal diagram of a sensor representing a conventional motor in an abnormal condition;
a depicts an output signal of the sensor of an embodiment of a motor;
b depicts output signal of another sensor of an embodiment of a motor; and
Motors and control methods thereof will be discussed in detail in the following.
In some embodiments, the sensors 16 and 18 are magnetic field sensors, such as a shunt, a current transformer, a Hall sensor or a magnetic resistor.
Referring to
When the output signal of the sensor 16 is alternately changed and the output signal of the sensor 18 is maintained at high level over the predetermined duration, the processor 42 outputs an enable signal to shut off the motor, thereby avoiding damage due to current overload.
a, and 6b are wave diagrams of sensors 16 and 18 when the rotor shakes. When the motor starts, and the sensor 16 detects the N-S boundary of the rotor 12, S16 is alternately changed and S18 is maintained at high level. At this time, the processor 42 receives the output signals and outputs an enable signal to stop the motor. As long as neither of the output signals is maintained at high level over the predetermined duration, the sensor can accurately detect the polarity of the rotor.
The predetermined duration depends on the rotational speed of the motor. The faster the rotational speed of the motor, the shorter the predetermined duration t1. The processor 42, such as a micro controller unit (MCU), controls the motor according to the output signals.
In step 100: when the rotor 12 stops, the two provided sensors 16 and 18 on the stator 10 do not detect the N-S boundary simultaneously and step 110 is then executed.
In step 110: The first, second, third or fourth signals are detected.
If any one of the first, second, third and fourth signals is maintained at high level or low level for a predetermined period t1 when the motor starts, and signals from the other sensor is alternative, step 130 is executed; otherwise step 120 is executed.
Referring to
In step 120: rotation of the motor is maintained.
If the N-S boundary of the rotor 12 is never positioned near the sensor 16 when the motor starts, the sensor 16 can correctly detect the N pole or the S pole of the rotor 12. The processor 42 changes the polarity of the stator 10 correctly to rotate the rotor 12 continuously.
In step 130: the motor is shut off.
When the processor 42 receives a high level or a low level signal from one of the sensors 16 or 18 for a predetermined duration t1, the motor is shut off to prevent damage due to current overload.
Two sensors are disposed on the stator of the motor of the invention, and the two sensors never detect the N-S boundary of the rotor at the same time. If one of the sensors detects the N-S boundary of the rotor when the motor starts, it is indicative that the rotor is shaking and cannot rotate normally. In this condition, the output signal of the other sensor is maintained at a high or low level for a predetermined duration. Thus, the motor is shut off to prevent damage.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements (as would be apparent to those skilled in the art). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
93105824 A | Mar 2004 | TW | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3679954 | Hedrick | Jul 1972 | A |
3743902 | Perkins et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3757183 | Nola | Sep 1973 | A |
3767986 | Wada | Oct 1973 | A |
3775648 | Brown et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3783359 | Malkiel | Jan 1974 | A |
3881142 | Endo et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3898544 | Tanikoshi | Aug 1975 | A |
3942083 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3988652 | Endo et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4114073 | Uzuka | Sep 1978 | A |
4135120 | Hoshimi et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4344023 | Yokobori et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4376261 | von der Heide et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4435673 | Hagino et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4479078 | Kidd et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4491770 | Gotou | Jan 1985 | A |
4535276 | Yokobori | Aug 1985 | A |
4554491 | Plunkett | Nov 1985 | A |
4563622 | Deavers et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4623826 | Benjamin et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4654567 | Bracha | Mar 1987 | A |
4665350 | Angi et al. | May 1987 | A |
4701683 | Kikkawa | Oct 1987 | A |
5206567 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5838127 | Young et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5872434 | Hill | Feb 1999 | A |
6239564 | Boe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271638 | Erdman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6640417 | Leitz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6806664 | Beishline | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6982534 | Hahn et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
20030227271 | Shindo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061470 | Ito et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
56-091668 | Jul 1981 | JP |
62-071488 | Apr 1987 | JP |
07-123771 | May 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050194849 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |