This invention relates to a mount for a boat propulsion unit. Particularly, but not exclusively, the invention relates to a mount for mounting an inboard propulsion unit in a boat hull.
Aspects of the present invention are particularly concerned with the mounting of electric propulsion units that consist of a saildrive projecting from the bottom of a boat's hull and that have an inboard motor mounted above the saildrive. In essence, a saildrive can be considered as a sailboat's equivalent of a motorboat's sterndrive, which projects from the stern of a boat and usually has a drive mounted outside of the hull (and is therefore also known as an outdrive). A saildrive is significantly different to a traditional inboard motor since it is not connected to the motor via a standard propeller shaft. Instead, inside a saildrive casing there is normally an L-gear that consists of a vertical (pinion) shaft, a horizontal (propeller) shaft and a bevel gear. A compact electric motor can then be positioned above the saildrive with the motor drive shaft extending downwardly through the hull to create a very compact unit maximizing the space in inside the boat.
An electric propulsion unit, such as that described above incorporating a saildrive, is normally rigidly mounted to the bottom of a boat either directly to the hull or onto a motor bed. Such a rigid mounting is fairly easy to achieve, however, a disadvantage is that a rigid mounting will transfer any vibrations caused by the propeller directly to the structures of the boat. This may result in noise, vibrations and, in the worst case, damage to some structures. It will also be understood that it is necessary to seal the gap between the drive/propulsion unit and the hull to prevent water ingress.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,690,959 discloses a mount suitable for a very large inboard drive unit. A simplified illustration of this arrangement is provided in
European patent application No. EP 0,811,511 discloses another mounting system for use with a sterndrive propulsion unit and which employs a very similar sealing arrangement to that described above.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide an alternative mount for a boat propulsion unit.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a mount for a boat propulsion unit comprising:
Embodiments of the invention effectively provide a flexible mounting arrangement in which the traditionally separate elements required for fixing two parts together and sealing the space between them is combined in a single component by way of the gasket of the present invention. Thus, the gasket serves to provide a watertight seal between the collar and the first and second parts; acts as a flexible (“floating”) mounting for the propulsion unit in the boat's hull; and also serves to transfer the power generated by the propulsion unit to the boat. An advantage of the present invention is that the gasket can absorb (or at least dampen) vibrations and thereby prevent (or minimise) the transfer of such vibrations from the propulsion unit to the boat since there is no rigid fixing or hard contact between the boat and the propulsion unit. The mount requires only a few discrete components and has a simple construction making it quick and easy to install. There is also no need for any electrical connections between the boat and the propulsion unit. Furthermore, the mount can be made to be compact and light and yet strong.
In use, the first and second mating parts may be configured to apply a force to compress the gasket when the first and second mating parts are connected. The force may be applied generally vertically through a portion of the gasket received in the recess. Thus, the force to compress the gasket may be transmitted through the innermost side of the gasket causing the gasket to expand radially outwardly into the groove to seal against the collar.
The applicants have found that the shape of the groove in the collar and the shape of the recess formed by the first and second mating parts can influence the power transfer and vibration dampening properties of the mount. Accordingly, the shapes of the groove and recess should be careful chosen to provide the desired properties.
The groove and the recess may have similar or different cross-sections.
The groove and/or the recess may be generally V-shaped or C-shaped. Thus, the groove and/or the recess may be formed by two inclined annular surfaces having an angle of less than 180 degrees there-between. The angle may be between 180 degrees and 90 degrees but is preferably 90 degrees or less. The inclined surfaces may join via a curved interface or a straight (e.g. vertical) interface. In certain embodiments, the groove and/or recess may be part-circular, for example, hemispherical.
The gasket may comprise rubber and may be in form of an O-ring. As above, the type of rubber employed in the gasket may influence the power transfer and vibration dampening properties of the mount.
The gasket may be substantially toroidal forming a circle in plan view. Alternatively, the gasket may be substantially oval, obround or elongated in plan view. The use of an oval, obround or elongated gasket may be particularly advantageous since it has been found that approximately 80% of the forces applied to the gasket in use are likely to be in the forwards and backwards directions and these can be most effectively managed by having a gasket elongated in the forwards and backwards directions.
It will be understood that the plan view shape of the groove and the recess will be required to correspond to the shape of the gasket so that the gasket can be partly received in the groove and the recess, when in use. Although not strictly necessary, the shapes of the collar and/or the first and second mating parts may also generally correspond to the shape of the gasket in plan view.
The gasket may have a vertical cross-section that is substantially circular. However, other cross-sections may be employed to impart specific characteristics to the gasket (e.g. to influence the compression characteristics and/or the load transfer characteristics of the gasket).
The collar may be substantially cylindrical or may be constituted by a substantially oval, obround or elongate section of tubing. As above, the applicants have found that the shape and size of the collar can affect the power transfer and vibration dampening properties of the mount and so these should also be carefully chosen to provide the desired results.
The collar may be affixed in a hole in the boat's hull or it may be integrally formed with the hull (e.g. by moulding the hull including the collar from glass reinforced plastic). Alternatively, the collar may be laminated in the boats hull. Where the collar is a discrete component for affixing to the hull, it may be formed from glass reinforced plastic, steel, aluminium or other durable materials.
The first and second mating parts may be made of metal and may be configured to form a continuous channel there-through.
The first mating part may be provided on a motor and the second mating part may be provided on a propeller unit such as a saildrive.
The first and second mating parts may be connectable via an attachment mechanism which may comprise complementary inter-engaging parts and may be configured for screwing the first and second parts together. Alternatively, the attachment mechanism may be constituted by a bayonet-type or other mechanical fastening.
The propulsion unit may be in the form of an inboard propulsion unit, an outboard propulsion unit, an electric propulsion unit, an internal combustion propulsion unit, a saildrive propulsion unit or a so-called propulsion pod unit.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a boat propulsion unit comprising a mount according to the first aspect of the present invention.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a boat comprising a mount according to the first aspect of the present invention.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of mounting a propulsion unit on a boat comprising:
Some embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
It will be noted from
The mount 30 further comprises an upper part 38 configured for attachment to an inboard motor or its housing (not shown) and a lower part 40 configured for attachment to a saildrive unit (not shown). Although not shown in the Figures, the upper part 38 and the lower part 40 will be hollow in practice to allow a motor drive shaft to extend through the mount 30 to operate the saildrive. The upper and lower parts 38, 40 also include an attachment mechanism (not shown) which is described below in relation to
In use, the upper and lower parts 38, 40 are attached together by inserting the upper part 38 into the collar 32 from within the boat and inserting the lower part 40 into the collar 32 from below the boat. The parts 38, 40 are shaped in such way that they will form a recess into which the gasket 36 will be partly located so that the parts 38, 40 can apply pressure on the gasket 36 when they are engaged and tightened together. This constant pressure (pre-stress) will serve to provide a watertight seal between the hull and the propulsion unit as well as providing a flexible mounting for the unit. It will be understood that a suitable pressure will required in order keep the mount 30 properly sealed also when thrust is applied to the boat.
In this particular embodiment, the upper part 38 has a downwardly extending frustoconical surface 42 terminating in a short cylindrical surface 44. The lower part 40 has an upwardly extending frustoconical surface 46 also terminating in a short cylindrical surface 48. The frustoconical surfaces 42, 46 are inclined such that they form an angle there-between of approximately 90 degrees when the upper and lower parts 38, 40 are engaged.
The applicants have determined several ways to adjust the vibration dampening and sealing properties of the mount 30. More specifically, they have discovered that by increasing the size of the collar 32 and parts 38, 40 the mount 30 can be configured to suit larger or more powerful propulsion units. In addition, the shape of the collar 32 can be changed depending on the nature of the drive to be used. A fixed drive is thought to benefit from an oval shaped mounting (as per
The shape of the groove 34 in the collar 32, the shape of the recess formed by the parts 38, 40, the tightness of the engagement between the parts 38, 40 as well as the size of the gap between the collar 32 and parts 38, 40 are all considered to affect the “hardness” (or flexibility) of the mount 30. The more free space the gasket 36 has to deform into, the softer the mounting will be. A powerful unit may require a relatively hard mounting to keep movement of the propulsion unit to an acceptable level. By carefully choosing a combination of these properties a suitable level of vibration dampening can be achieved.
As above, the mount 50 further comprises an upper part 64 which, in this case, is attached to the inboard motor 52 and a lower part 66 which, in this case, is attached to the saildrive 54. Also as described above, the upper part 64 and the lower part 66 will be hollow in practice to allow a motor drive shaft (not shown) to extend through the mount 50 to operate the saildrive 54 and the upper and lower parts 64, 66 also include an attachment mechanism (not shown) which is described below in relation to
Although it is not evident from
As shown in
Using an O-ring for attaching the propulsion unit to the boat hull is convenient as this kind of mechanical gasket is readily available as a standard part and will thus keep costs down. It is noted that O-rings are normally used only for sealing in either static or dynamic mechanical applications. However, in the present invention the O-ring is employed in a different way since (in addition to sealing the mounting) it will be the component that insures that the whole propulsion unit is secured to the boat as well as helping to dampen any vibrations.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that various modifications may be made to the above embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1016134.7 | Sep 2010 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/065853 | 9/13/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/13/2013 |