1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to assemblies for mounting devices for reproducing sound, such as loudspeakers, in a barrier or partition. More specifically, it relates to more convenient means for mounting loudspeakers in the walls or ceiling of a room in such a way that performance is also improved.
2. Background of the Invention
Loudspeakers built into walls or ceilings as a substitute for conventional floor standing or book shelf loudspeakers have grown in popularity over the last few decades. Their appeal lies in their low visual impact in a room and that they occupy negligible space in the occupied area.
Many different mounting systems for so called “in-wall” or “in-ceiling” loudspeakers are currently in use, such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,578,808 and in 5,400,412. However, the primary focus of these systems is convenience and ease of installation for the installer. Most of these systems rely on the face material of the partition, usually drywall, to support the speaker system and utilize some form of clamping system to hold the speaker system in place. However, research has shown that drywall does not have adequate stiffness or damping to deliver audio performance equal to that typically delivered by freestanding loudspeakers whose enclosures are constructed from materials better suited to suppressing the vibrations produced by a loudspeaker. Due in part to this problem, it is generally accepted that in-wall speakers do not perform as well as free standing speakers of otherwise equivalent cost and quality.
The negative effect of this lack of proper vibration control is two fold. First, energy that would be used by the loudspeaker system to make music is now transferred to the surrounding wall or ceiling. This does not happen evenly at all frequencies and will distort the resulting sound in the room. Additionally, the energy transmitted to the wall can cause the wall or anything attached to it to vibrate and cause unwanted noises such as buzzes or rattles. This transmitted energy may also cause unwanted noises in rooms on the opposite side of the wall upon which the speaker is mounted.
One mounting method that attempts to address this problem is to provide an enclosure inside the wall for containing the acoustic energy radiated from the rear of the speaker. In this method, a pre-fabricated or custom built enclosure is mounted between the studs or joists prior to installation of drywall. The enclosure defines a mounting hole and location for the speaker and, depending on the means of securing the enclosure in the wall and the means for mounting the speaker in the enclosure, may help control vibration of the drywall. However, these enclosures are, of necessity, larger than the required mounting hole and must either be installed prior to drywall installation or will require removal, replacement and refinishing of substantial sections of the drywall in a retro-fit installation. In addition, standard enclosures may not fit in the wall space available due to pre-existing conditions such as irregular construction or the presence of other building systems already in the wall. Fabrication of a costly custom enclosure would be required in such circumstances to employ this method.
Other in-wall loudspeaker mounting devices known as “pre-construction brackets” or “rough-in kits” are often used in new construction. These brackets are often attached to two studs or ceiling joists using nails or screws prior to drywall installation for the purpose of locating the mounting hole for an in-wall loudspeaker, prior to drywall installation. These brackets provide the drywall installer with a guide to make the speaker mounting hole in the correct place as the drywall is being placed. However, since the only purpose of these brackets is to act as a location guide they are typically made from inexpensive materials, usually plastic, which offer no structural support. Once the speaker is mounted it still depends almost solely on the rigidity of the drywall surrounding the hole for support and for control of the vibration produced by the loudspeaker. Also, as their name implies, these pre-construction brackets are only usable before the drywall has been installed.
Similar pre-construction brackets are used in the lighting and electrical industry for locating and supporting lighting fixtures, electrical boxes and the like prior to drywall installation. Such a device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,957,574. In addition, there are numerous prior art brackets for locating and supporting electrical boxes or fixtures from adjacent studs or joists as is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,752,472, 2,670,919, 2,788,188, 3,518,421, 4,463,923, 4,513,994 and 4,909,405, each of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. As can be seen from these disclosures some of these devices are also suitable for installation after drywall is in place. However, since control of acoustically induced vibration is not an issue, none of these devices include any means for improving the rigidity or resistance to vibration of the drywall between the mounting hole and the adjacent studs or joists.
It is therefore clear that a need exists for an in-wall or in-ceiling loudspeaker mounting system which is both practical in retro fit applications, easy to install and offers performance improvements through improved structural integrity and control of acoustically induced vibration.
An improved mounting system for use in in-wall and in-ceiling loudspeaker systems is disclosed. The mounting system can be installed either before or after drywall has been affixed to the wall or ceiling without damaging the wall or ceiling in either case. The mounting system is easy to install and requires a minimal number of common tools to install.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a bracket assembly is used to mechanically couple the partition and loudspeaker to the supporting studs or joists on both sides of the hole in which a loudspeaker will be mounted. The bracket assembly may comprise two halves, each of which includes a bracket plate, a left bracket slider and a right bracket slider, and associated fasteners. Each half of the bracket is sized so that it will pass easily through the opening made in the partition for receiving the loudspeaker. Once inside the partition, the two bracket sliders expand to reach the nearby studs or joists where they are coupled to the studs or joists using fasteners such as screws. The bracket is installed such that the bracket plate is flush to the interior face of the partition. Once the bracket sliders are attached, they are secured to the bracket plate with fasteners such as thumbscrews, thereby making a rigid structure. This is repeated for the other half of the bracket assembly.
The loudspeaker is then inserted into the hole and secured using the clamping “dog” fixtures integral to the loudspeaker. These clamps sandwich the loudspeaker frame, partition and bracket assembly into one rigid structure which is itself anchored to the supporting members of the partition by the bracket sliders as previously discussed. The resulting stiffness and vibration control of the new structure is superior to that of the partition alone. This may improve the audio performance of the loudspeaker and reduce unwanted vibration and noise in the room.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following figures and detailed description.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are now described with reference to the figures, where like reference numbers in the figures and description indicate identical or functionally similar elements. While specific configurations and arrangements are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustrative purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other configurations and arrangements can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The installation of the bracket assembly will now be explained.
Bracket plate 14 may optionally include teeth 14t that will dig into partition 12 when bracket assembly 10 is clamped down, as shown in
Second half 10b of bracket assembly 10 is mounted in a similar manner to first half 10a and the entire assembly is illustrated in
With bracket assembly 10 installed into partition 12, a loudspeaker 22 may be coupled to bracket assembly 10, as shown in
In order to secure loudspeaker 22 in partition 12, mounting dogs 23 are tightened to claims partition 12 and bracket assembly 10 are between mounting dogs 23 and lip 24, as shown in
The many features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the detailed specification and, thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation illustrated and described, and accordingly all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1752472 | Whitney | Apr 1930 | A |
| 2670919 | Esoldi | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2788188 | Smith et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
| 3518421 | Cogdill | Jun 1970 | A |
| 4463923 | Reiker | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4513994 | Dover et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4909405 | Kerr, Jr. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5044582 | Walters | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5400412 | King et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5574796 | Keezer | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5690423 | Hentz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5957574 | Hentz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6578808 | Bertagni et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6870943 | Liu | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7234674 | Rippel et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 20030006353 | Dinh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030155473 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005073 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067546 | Dinh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050230589 | Wronski | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070290112 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |