The present disclosure relates generally to a mounting bracket for coupling a composite floor of a cargo vehicle to a chassis of the cargo vehicle.
Vehicles having cargo bodies are used in the transportation industry for transporting many different types of cargo. Certain cargo bodies may be refrigerated and insulated to transport temperature-sensitive cargo. The use of metal components within the floor, roof, sidewalls, and/or nose of the cargo body may contribute to heat loss from the interior of the cargo body and/or higher overall weight of the truck body. In order to reduce heat loss and the overall weight of the truck body, some cargo bodies are now being made of composite materials. However, coupling the composite materials to a chassis of the cargo vehicle has proven to be difficult, because present mounting apparatuses are generally relatively heavy and cumbersome to install. Thus, a need exists for a mounting apparatus for coupling the cargo body of a vehicle to the chassis of the vehicle that is lighter weight and easier to install.
A mounting apparatus is disclosed for coupling a chassis rail of a cargo vehicle to a longitudinal composite support beam that extends from a lower surface of a composite floor of the cargo vehicle.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a cargo vehicle comprising a chassis having at least one longitudinal rail coupled to a motorized truck, a cargo body coupled to the chassis and including a floor for supporting cargo, the floor of the cargo body having at least one longitudinal composite support beam that extends from a lower surface of the floor, and at least one mounting apparatus coupling the longitudinal rail of the chassis to the longitudinal composite support beam of the floor of the cargo body is disclosed. The mounting apparatus includes a support beam coupler adhesively bonded to the longitudinal composite support beam, at least one connector comprising a plurality of legs and coupled to the support beam coupler, at least a portion of the connector being positioned between a bottom surface of the longitudinal composite support beam and an inner surface of the support beam coupler, and a chassis rail bracket coupled to the at least one connector beneath the longitudinal rail of the chassis.
In certain embodiments, the support beam coupler comprises at least two flanges, a first of the at least two flanges being adhesively bonded to a first side surface of the longitudinal composite support beam and a second of the at least two flanges being adhesively bonded to a second side of the longitudinal composite support beam.
In certain embodiments, at least one spacer coupled to the longitudinal support beam creates a space between the longitudinal rail of the chassis and an outer surface of the support beam coupler.
In certain embodiments, the support beam coupler is a two-piece component comprising a first rounded L-shaped bracket and a second rounded L-shaped bracket.
In certain embodiments, the first rounded L-shaped bracket comprises an elongated cutout sized to receive one of the plurality of legs of the at least one connector, and the second rounded L-shaped bracket comprises a notch sized to receive another of the plurality of legs of the at least one connector.
In certain embodiments, the support beam coupler comprises a single substantially U-shaped bracket.
In certain embodiments, the single substantially U-shaped bracket includes a plurality of cutouts for receiving the plurality of legs of the at least one connector.
In certain embodiments, the at least one connector is a single U-bolt.
In certain embodiments, the longitudinal rail of the chassis is positioned vertically between an outer surface of the chassis rail bracket and an outer surface of the support beam coupler.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for coupling a chassis rail of a vehicle to a longitudinal composite support beam that extends from a lower surface of a composite floor of a cargo body of the vehicle is disclosed. The method comprises coupling at least one connector to a support beam coupler, adhesively bonding the support beam coupler to the longitudinal composite support beam such that at least a portion of the at least one connector is positioned between an inner surface of the support beam coupler and a bottom surface of the composite support beam, positioning a chassis rail adjacent the support beam coupler and between legs of the at least one connector, and coupling a chassis rail bracket to the legs of the at least one connector using at least one coupler such that the chassis rail is coupled between the chassis rail bracket, the support beam coupler, and the legs of the at least one connector.
In certain embodiments, a space created by at least one spacer remains between the chassis rail and the support beam coupler after the chassis rail bracket is coupled to the legs of the at least one connector.
In certain embodiments, the support beam coupler comprises a first rounded L-shaped bracket and a second rounded L-shaped bracket.
In certain embodiments, the method further comprises welding the first rounded L-shaped bracket to the second rounded L-shaped bracket after the support beam coupler is bonded to the longitudinal composite support beam.
In certain embodiments, the support beam coupler comprises a single substantially U-shaped bracket.
In certain embodiments, coupling the at least one connector to the support beam coupler comprises positioning legs of the at least one connector within at least one cutout in the support beam coupler prior to bonding the support beam coupler to the support beam.
In certain embodiments, adhesively bonding the support beam coupler to the support beam comprises bonding the first rounded L-shaped bracket to the support beam, positioning at least a portion of the at least one connector between the first and second L-shaped brackets and the support beam, and bonding the second L-shaped bracket to the support beam.
In certain embodiments, the second L-shaped bracket is bonded to the support beam after the first rounded L-shaped bracket.
In certain embodiments, the first rounded L-shaped bracket is coupled to the support beam before the at least one connector is coupled between the first and second rounded L-shaped brackets and the support beam.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a cargo vehicle comprising a chassis coupled to a motorized truck and having at least one longitudinal rail, a cargo body coupled to the chassis and including a floor for supporting cargo, the floor of the cargo body having at least one longitudinal composite support beam that extends from a lower surface of the floor, and at least one mounting apparatus coupling the longitudinal rail of the chassis to the longitudinal composite support beam is disclosed. The mounting apparatus comprises a support beam coupler adhesively bonded to the longitudinal support beam, at least one connector coupled to the support beam coupler, wherein at least a portion of the at least one connector is aligned vertically beneath the longitudinal support beam, and a chassis rail bracket coupled to the at least one connector beneath the longitudinal rail of the chassis.
In certain embodiments, at least one spacer coupled to the longitudinal support beam is configured to create a space between the longitudinal rail of the chassis and an outer surface of the support beam coupler.
In certain embodiments, at least a portion of the at least one connector is positioned between an inner surface of the support beam coupler and a bottom surface of the longitudinal support beam.
In certain embodiments, the at least one connector includes a plurality of vertical legs, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of vertical legs are aligned vertically beneath the longitudinal support beam.
According to another exemplary embodiment, a mounting apparatus for use with a cargo vehicle comprising a chassis having at least one longitudinal rail coupled to a motorized truck and a cargo body coupled to the chassis and including a floor for supporting cargo, the floor of the cargo body having at least one longitudinal composite support beam that extends from a lower surface of the floor is provided. The mounting apparatus is used to couple the longitudinal rail of the chassis to the longitudinal composite support beam of the floor of the cargo body. The mounting apparatus generally comprises a support beam coupler adhesively bonded to the longitudinal composite support beam, at least one connector comprising a plurality of legs and coupled to the support beam coupler, at least a portion of the connector being positioned between a bottom surface of the longitudinal composite support beam and an inner surface of the support beam coupler, and a chassis rail bracket coupled to the at least one connector beneath the longitudinal rail of the chassis.
Additional features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The foregoing aspects and many of the intended advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. Although the drawings represent embodiments of various features and components according to the present disclosure, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated in order to better illustrate and explain the present disclosure. The exemplification set out herein illustrates an embodiment of the invention, and such an exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principals of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, which are described below. The embodiments disclosed below are not intended to be exhaustive or limit the invention to the precise form disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art may utilize their teachings. It will be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. The invention includes any alterations and further modifications in the illustrative devices and described methods and further applications of the principles of the invention which would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
1. Cargo Vehicle
Referring initially to
In the illustrated embodiment of
2. Composite Materials
The cargo body 130 may be constructed, at least in part, of composite materials. For example, the floor 140, roof 150, right and left sidewalls 160, and/or nose 170 of the cargo body 130 may be constructed of composite materials. As such, the cargo body 130, as well as the floor 140, roof 150, right and left sidewalls 160, and/or nose 170 of the cargo body 130, may be referred to herein as composite structures. These composite structures may lack internal metal components. Also, each composite structure may be a single, unitary component, which may be formed from a plurality of layers permanently coupled together. Other elements of the cargo body 130 may be constructed of non-composite (e.g., metallic) materials. For example, the rear frame 182 of the cargo body 130 may be constructed of metallic materials.
The composite construction of the cargo body 130 may present certain advantages. First, because the composite structures may lack internal metal components, the composite cargo body 130 may have a reduced heat loss coefficient (Ua) and improved thermal efficiency. Also, the composite cargo body 130 may operate to minimize outgassing of blowing agents, minimize air loss, and minimize water intrusion. Additionally, the composite cargo body 130 may be lighter in weight than a typical metallic cargo body, which may improve fuel efficiency. Further, the composite cargo body 130 may have fewer metallic structures than a typical cargo body, which may make the cargo body 130 less susceptible to corrosion. Also, the composite cargo body 130 may include fewer parts than a typical metallic cargo body, which may simplify construction, reduce inventory, and reduce variation in manufacturing. Further, the composite cargo body 130 may be suitable for use with sensitive cargo, including foodstuffs, because the composite materials may be inert to avoid reacting with the cargo and other materials and because the composite materials may be easy to clean and maintain to ensure proper hygiene. As a result, the composite cargo body 130 may qualify as “food grade” equipment.
Composite materials are generally formed by combining two or more different constituents that remain separate and distinct in the final composite material. Exemplary composite materials include fiber-reinforced plastics (FRP), for example carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics (CRP). Such materials may be formed from an extruded preform assembly of a woven or stitched fiberglass cloth, a non-woven spun bond polymeric material, and a foam core (not shown). These preforms may be cut to size, combined in a mold resembling the final shape with other fiberglass and resin layers, and wetted with at least one resin and optionally a catalyst to define a single structure during a curing process. The spun bond polymeric material may be mechanically stitched to the fiberglass cloth and/or the foam before the preforms are wetted with resin. In one embodiment, the spun bond material may be a polyester material, the foam may be a polyurethane material, and the resin may be a thermoset plastic resin matrix. An exemplary resin is the co-cure resin disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,371,468, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
The individual preforms may be sized, shaped, and arranged in a manner that accommodates the strength requirements of the final structure. In areas of the final structure requiring less strength, the preforms may be relatively large in size, with the foam cores spanning relatively large distances before reaching the surrounding fiberglass and polymeric skins. By contrast, in areas of the final structure requiring more strength, the preforms may be relatively small in size, with the foam cores spanning relatively small distances before reaching the surrounding fiberglass and polymeric skins. For example, the preforms may be shaped as relatively wide panels in areas of the final structure requiring less strength and as relatively narrow support beams in areas of the final structure requiring more strength. Other exemplary techniques for strengthening such support beams include reinforcing the outer skins, such as by using uni-directional glass fibers or additional cloth in the outer skins, and/or reinforcing the inner cores, such as by using hard plastic blocks or higher density foam in the inner cores.
After the curing process, a coating may be applied to the inner and/or outer surfaces of the cured preforms. Additionally, metallic or non-metallic sheets or panels may be applied to the inner and/or outer surfaces of the cured preforms, either in place of the coating or with the coating. The metallic sheets or panels may be comprised of stainless steel, aluminum, and/or coated carbon steel, and the non-metallic sheets or panels may be comprised of carbon fiber composites, for example.
Exemplary composite structures include DuraPlate® structures provided by Wabash National Corporation of Lafayette, Ind. and PRISMA® structures provided by Compsys, Inc. of Melbourne, Fla. Such composite structures may be manufactured using technology disclosed in the following patents and published patent applications, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,429,066, 5,800,749, 5,664,518, 5,897,818, 6,013,213, 6,004,492, 5,908,591, 6,497,190, 6,911,252, 5,830,308, 6,755,998, 6,496,190, 6,911,252, 6,723,273, 6,869,561, 8,474,871, 6,206,669, 6,543,469, and 9,371,468 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0262011.
3. Adhesive Bonding
Various connections or joints of the composite cargo body 130 may be assembled, at least in part, using adhesive bonding. The adhesive may be a structural adhesive that is suitable for load-bearing applications. The adhesive may have a lap shear strength greater than 1 MPa, 10 MPa, or more, for example. Exemplary adhesives include, for example, epoxies, acrylics, urethanes (single and two part), polyurethanes, methyl methacrylates (MMA), cyanoacrylates, anaerobics, phenolics, and/or vinyl acetates. The adhesive may be selected based on the needs of the particular application.
The method used to form an adhesive bond may also vary according to the needs of the particular application. First, the surfaces receiving the adhesive (i.e., adherends) may be pre-treated, such as by abrading the surfaces, applying a primer, and/or cleaning the surfaces with a suitable cleaner (e.g., denatured alcohol). Second, the adhesive may be applied to the surfaces over a predetermined application time (i.e., “open” time) and at a predetermined application temperature. In certain embodiments, the application temperature may be below the glass-transition temperature of the adhesive. Third, pressure may be applied to the surfaces, such as by using clamps, weights, vacuum bags, and/or ratchet straps, for example. Finally, the adhesive may be allowed to solidify. Some adhesives may undergo a chemical reaction in order to solidify, referred to as curing. This curing may occur over a predetermined cure time and at a predetermined cure temperature. In certain embodiments, the adhesive may be heated during curing such that the cure temperature is higher than the application temperature.
Using adhesive bonding to assemble the composite cargo body 130 rather than mechanical fasteners may present certain advantages. First, the composite structures may not require holes for mechanical fasteners, so the structural integrity of the composite structures may be maintained. Also, the adhesive bond may be stronger than a connection using mechanical fasteners. In fact, the strength of the adhesive bond may exceed the strength of the composite structures themselves, so the composite structures may delaminate or otherwise fail before the adhesive fails. Further, the elimination of mechanical fasteners may also provide improved aesthetics. Finally, the adhesive may form a seal between the adherends, which may help fill intentional or unintentional spaces between the adherends and insulate the cargo body 130.
4. Connectors
Various connections of the composite cargo body 130 may be assembled using one or more connectors, which may include brackets, braces, plates, and combinations thereof, for example. The connectors may vary in size and shape. For example, suitable connectors may be L-shaped, C-shaped, T-shaped, pi-shaped, flat, or bent.
The connectors may be constructed of metallic materials (e.g., aluminum, titanium, or steel), polymeric materials, wood, or composite materials. In certain embodiments, the connectors are constructed of materials which are dissimilar from the composite material used to construct the composite cargo body 130. The connectors may be fabricated by extrusion, pultrusion, sheet forming and welding, roll forming, and/or casting, for example.
The connectors may be adhesively bonded to composite structures of the cargo body 130. For example, the connectors may be adhesively bonded to the composite floor 140, the composite roof 150, the composite right and left sidewalls 150, and/or the composite nose 170 of the cargo body 130. The connectors may be mechanically fastened to non-composite (e.g., metallic) structures of the cargo body 130. For example, the connectors may be mechanically fastened to the metallic rear frame 182 of the cargo body 130. Suitable mechanical fasteners include bolts, rivets, and screws, for example.
5. Connection Between Composite Floor and Metallic Chassis
Referring next to
A plurality of first mounting assemblies 510 are provided along the length of vehicle 100 (
As shown in
Still referring to
In various embodiments, support beam coupler 520 of mounting assembly 510 may be a single U-shaped bracket. To assemble mounting assembly 510, support beam coupler 520 and connector 530 may be assembled such that legs 532, 534 of connector 530 are positioned within apertures or cutouts 536 in support beam coupler 520. Then, flanges 522, 524 of support beam coupler 520 may be adhesively bonded to the composite support beam 142 of the composite floor 140 such that the horizontal connecting leg 538 of the connector 530 is positioned between support beam 142 and support beam coupler 520. Specifically, one of the flanges 522, 524 of the support beam coupler 520 may be adhesively bonded to a first side 143 of the composite support beam 142 of the composite floor 140 using adhesive, and the other of the flanges 522, 524 of the support beam coupler 520 may be adhesively bonded to a second side 145 of the composite support beam 142 of the composite floor 140 using adhesive. In various embodiments, flanges 522, 524 are configured such that they do not abut horizontal portions 147 of support beams 142 in order to prevent a stress riser from being created by their abutment. Next, the composite support beam 142 of the composite floor 140 may be lowered onto the corresponding rail 112 of the chassis 110. In various embodiments, connector 530 is coupled to the support beam coupler 520 in a manner that resists vertical movement, but accommodates some longitudinal shifting to fit over the chassis rail. At any point prior to support beam 142 being lowered onto rail 112, spacer(s) 502 may be coupled to support beams 142 with the connecting member 526 of support beam coupler 520 sized and shaped to fit in notch 504. As indicated above, notch 504 may be formed within a single spacer 502 or between two adjacent pieces of spacers 502. Then, chassis rail bracket 540 may be coupled to connector 530 beneath chassis rail 112 and the mounting assembly 510 may be clamped together by coupling fasteners 560 to legs 532, 534 of connector 530, which may be inserted through aligned holes 541 in chassis rail bracket 540. When each of the mounting assemblies 510 are clamped together in this manner, connection 500 is formed between the composite floor 140 of the cargo body 130 and the metallic chassis 110 of the straight frame vehicle 100. This connection 500 prevents the cargo body 130 from sliding off the chassis 110 when vehicle 100 is stopping, traveling, or parking on a hill, for example. This connection 500 also prevents the cargo body 130 from shifting side-to-side relative to the chassis 110 when vehicle 100 is turning, for example.
A plurality of second mounting assemblies 510′ are shown in
To assemble mounting assembly 510′, the first L-shaped bracket 527 is adhesively bonded to support beam 142 leaving a space 514 with a width substantially equal to a width of connector 530. Next, connector 530 is assembled with second L-shaped bracket 529 by positioning one of legs 532, 534 in cutout 536′ of the second L-shaped bracket 529. Then, support beam coupler 520′ is assembled by overlapping second leg 528′ of the second L-shaped bracket 529 with second leg 528′ of the first L-shaped bracket 527, positioning the other of legs 532, 534 in cutout 536′ created by notch 531 and the assembly of the first and second L-shaped brackets 527, 529, positioning horizontal connecting leg 538 of connector 530 within space 514, and adhesively bonding the second L-shaped bracket 529 to support beam 142. In various embodiments, flanges 522, 524 are configured such that they do not abut horizontal portions 147 of support beams 142 in order to prevent a stress riser from being created by their abutment. Once first and second L-shaped brackets 527, 529 are bonded to support beam 142, brackets 527, 529 may be coupled together by way of bead welding. Next, the composite support beam 142 of the composite floor 140 may be lowered onto the corresponding rail 112 of the chassis 110. At any point prior to support beam 142 being lowered onto rail 112, spacer(s) 502 may be coupled to support beams 142. The two-piece connecting member 526′ of support beam coupler 520′, comprising overlapping second legs 528′ of first L-shaped bracket 527 and second L-shaped bracket 529, may be sized and shaped to fit in notch 504. As indicated above, notch 504 may be formed within a single spacer 502 or between two adjacent pieces of spacers 502. Then, chassis rail bracket 540 may be coupled to connector 530 adjacent chassis rail 112 and the mounting assembly 510′ may be clamped together by coupling fasteners 560 to legs 532, 534 of connector 530, which may be inserted through aligned holes 541 in chassis rail bracket 540. When mounting assembly 510′ is clamped together in this manner, connection 500 is formed between the composite floor 140 of the cargo body 130 and the metallic chassis 110 of the straight frame vehicle 100. This connection 500 prevents the cargo body 130 from sliding off the chassis 110 when vehicle 100 is stopping, traveling, or parking on a hill, for example. This connection 500 also prevents the cargo body 130 from shifting side-to-side relative to the chassis 110 when vehicle 100 is turning, for example.
In various embodiments, connection 500 may include at least one of each mounting assemblies 510 and 510′. In other embodiment, connection 500 may include only a single type of mounting assembly 510 or 510′.
Connector 530 may be used interchangeably with first mounting apparatuses 510 and second mounting apparatuses 510′. As shown in
With reference to
In addition, and referring to
While this invention has been described as having an exemplary design, the present invention may be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practices in the art to which this invention pertains.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/382,095, filed Aug. 31, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3557992 | Reeves | Jan 1971 | A |
3637252 | Metsker | Jan 1972 | A |
4418507 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4685720 | Oren | Aug 1987 | A |
4758299 | Burke | Jul 1988 | A |
4976490 | Gentle | Dec 1990 | A |
5403063 | Sjostedt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429066 | Lewit et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5507405 | Thomas | Apr 1996 | A |
5562981 | Ehrlich | Oct 1996 | A |
5664518 | Lewit et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700118 | Bennett | Dec 1997 | A |
5765639 | Muth | Jun 1998 | A |
5772276 | Fetz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800749 | Lewit et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802984 | Thoman | Sep 1998 | A |
5830308 | Reichard | Nov 1998 | A |
5860668 | Hull et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860693 | Ehrlich | Jan 1999 | A |
5890435 | Thoman | Apr 1999 | A |
5897818 | Lewit et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908591 | Lewit et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916093 | Fecko | Jun 1999 | A |
5979684 | Ohnishi | Nov 1999 | A |
5992117 | Schmidt | Nov 1999 | A |
6004492 | Lewit et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013213 | Lewit et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6076693 | Reiter | Jun 2000 | A |
6082810 | Bennett | Jul 2000 | A |
6092472 | Thoman | Jul 2000 | A |
6109684 | Reitnouer | Aug 2000 | A |
6199939 | Ehrlich | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206669 | Lewit et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220651 | Ehrlich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227125 | Schroeder | May 2001 | B1 |
6247747 | Kawanomoto | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6318794 | Berube | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349988 | Foster | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374546 | Fecko | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6496190 | Driemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497190 | Lewit | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505883 | Ehrlich | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543469 | Lewit et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6615741 | Fecko | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626622 | Zubko | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6688835 | Buher | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723273 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740381 | Day et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745470 | Foster et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755998 | Reichard et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761840 | Fecko | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6824341 | Ehrlich | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6843525 | Preisler | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854791 | Jaggi | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6863339 | Bohm | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869561 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877940 | Nelson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893075 | Fenton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911252 | Lewit et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6986546 | Ehrlich | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000978 | Messano | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7025166 | Thomas | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025408 | Jones et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069702 | Ehrlich | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7134820 | Ehrlich | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7182396 | Taylor | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7219952 | Taylor | May 2007 | B2 |
7264305 | Kuriakose | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7353960 | Seiter | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7407216 | Taylor | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7434520 | Zupancich | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451995 | Bloodworth et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461888 | Brown | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7517005 | Kuriakose | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7575264 | Solomon | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7578534 | Weariful, III | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578541 | Layfield | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587984 | Zupancich | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588286 | Lewallen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594474 | Zupancich | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608313 | Solomon | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621589 | Gerome | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7704026 | Roush | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722112 | Ehrlich | May 2010 | B2 |
7748172 | Zupancich | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762618 | Lewallen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770928 | Booher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790076 | Seiter | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7829165 | Grandominico et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7887120 | Bovine | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901537 | Jones | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905072 | Verhaeghe | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914034 | Roush | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7931328 | Lewallen | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8016322 | Keehan | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056960 | Brown | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8186747 | Bloodworth et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8263217 | Verhaeghe | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8342588 | Skaradzinski | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8448989 | Verhaeghe | May 2013 | B2 |
8474871 | Ludwick | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8696048 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8757704 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8814255 | Yamaji et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8876193 | Kunkel et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8950144 | Padmanabhan | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9051014 | Lookebill et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9138943 | Weinberg | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138974 | Weinberg | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138975 | Weinberg | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9174656 | Heitmeyer | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9199440 | Weinberg | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9205635 | Weinberg | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9260117 | Vande Sands | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9339987 | Weinberg | May 2016 | B2 |
9371468 | Lewit | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9409607 | Osten | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9434421 | Lu | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9499203 | Finley | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9566769 | Weinberg | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9604677 | McKinney | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9650003 | Owens | May 2017 | B2 |
9708009 | Vance | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9738050 | Lee | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744753 | Sheffield | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9815501 | McCormack | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827750 | Lookebill | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9828164 | Denson | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9878744 | Lu | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9884660 | Fenton | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9884661 | Fenton | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9889637 | Weinberg | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010011832 | Ehrlich | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20050194381 | Zupancich | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241253 | Song et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060065152 | Heitmeyer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060108361 | Seiter | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121244 | Godwin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123725 | Godwin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158005 | Brown | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179733 | Padmanabhan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201081 | Godwin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219129 | Jarvis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070119850 | Seiter | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132278 | Lester et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160793 | Cageao | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194602 | Ehrlich | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216197 | Wuerfel, III | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250025 | Sams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080290057 | Zupancich | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090126600 | Zupancich | May 2009 | A1 |
20090278386 | Ehrlich | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100101876 | Misencik | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109309 | Kootstra | May 2010 | A1 |
20110095574 | Brown | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110204611 | Ziegler | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130207413 | Lookebill et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140199551 | Lewit | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140262011 | Lewit et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300134 | Gerst | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150054311 | Marchesano et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150076861 | Padmanabhan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150137560 | Presiler | May 2015 | A1 |
20150158532 | Ayuzawa | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150203160 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20170057561 | Fenton | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170166263 | McKinney | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170210317 | Owens | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170240216 | Bauer | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240217 | Storz | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241134 | McCloud | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170247063 | Banerjee | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170282499 | LaRocco | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170334489 | Shin | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180037151 | Bauer et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
713260 | Nov 1999 | AU |
1329818 | May 1994 | CA |
2181750 | Jan 1997 | CA |
2199584 | Sep 1997 | CA |
2253308 | Nov 1997 | CA |
2551863 | Mar 1998 | CA |
2219312 | Apr 1998 | CA |
2242467 | Jul 1999 | CA |
2261384 | Aug 1999 | CA |
2265405 | Jan 2000 | CA |
2275848 | Dec 2000 | CA |
2382578 | Mar 2001 | CA |
2455957 | May 2004 | CA |
2768878 | Mar 2005 | CA |
2811134 | Apr 2006 | CA |
2529762 | Jun 2006 | CA |
2650992 | Nov 2006 | CA |
2528558 | May 2007 | CA |
2565510 | Aug 2007 | CA |
2604282 | Mar 2008 | CA |
2689745 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2689746 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2689747 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2689748 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2689749 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2689751 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2797778 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2802907 | Jul 2009 | CA |
2788047 | Aug 2011 | CA |
2763094 | Jul 2012 | CA |
2848174 | Oct 2014 | CA |
2894059 | Dec 2015 | CA |
2807710 | May 2016 | CA |
2977131 | Sep 2016 | CA |
2958805 | Aug 2017 | CA |
2958838 | Aug 2017 | CA |
2958839 | Aug 2017 | CA |
2617169 | Oct 2013 | DE |
2660119 | Jun 2013 | EP |
06293233 | Oct 1994 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Black, Sara, “Structural adhesives, Part I: Industrial,” CompositesWorld, posted Apr. 11, 2016, 7 pages. |
CMS North America, Inc., “Transportation: Refrigerated Semi-trailers, Trailers & Vans,” available online at http://www.cmsna.com/13_transportation_refrigerated_semi_trailers_trailers_vans.php on or before Jul. 2, 2014, 2 pages. |
North American Composites, Virtual Engineered Composites (VEC) Article, available online at http://www.nacomposites.com/delivering-performance/page.asp?issueid=7&page=cover, Fall 2006, 4 pages. |
Reichard, Dr. Ronnal P., “Composites in Theme Parks: From the perspective of a contractor—trouble shooter-enthusiast!” presented at Florida Institute of Technology at least as early as 1999, 37 pages. |
Lightweight Structures B.V., “ColdFeather: lightweight composite isothermal trailer,” available online at http://www.lightweight-structures.com/coldfeather-lightweight-composite-isothermal-trailedindex.html at least as early as Jun. 18, 2015, 6 pages. |
Expedition Portal, “Truck Camper Construction Costs?,” available online at http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/12486-Truck-Camper-Construction-Costs at least as early as Jun. 18, 2015, 5 pages. |
Griffiths, Bob, “Rudder Gets New Twist with Composites,” CompositesWorld, posted Aug. 1, 2006, 4 pages. |
Morey, Bruce, “Advanced Technologies Supplement: Processes Reduce Composite Costs,” Advanced Manufacturing, posted Apr. 1, 2007, 7 pages. |
NetCompositesNow.com, “Twisted Composites Rudders,” available online at http://www.netcomposites.com/news/twisted-composites-rudders/3202 as early as Aug. 11, 2005, 3 pages. |
Eric Green Associates.com, “Composite Rudders Take Shape for U.S. Navy” available online at http://www.ericgreeneassociates.com/images/Composite_Twisted_Rudder.pdf, accessed as early as Jul. 13, 2014, 7 pages. |
Seaver, Mark and Trickey, Stephen, “Underwater Blast Loading of a Composite Twisted Rudder with FBGS,” dated Apr. 14, 2008, 19th International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors, 2 pages. |
Scott Bader Group Companies, Crystic, “Composites Handbook”, 100 pages. |
Kedward, Keith and Whitney, James, Delaware Composites Design Encyclopedia, “Design Studies,” vol. 5, 1990, preview version available at https://books.google.com/books?id=9-KYOm81MWEC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false, 17 pages. |
Zweben, Carl, Handbook of Materials Selection, “Chapter 12: Composite Materials,” 2002, preview version available at https://books.google.com/books?id=gWg-rchM700C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false, 47 pages. |
Johnson Truck Bodies, Blizzard Series brochure, accessed as early as Aug. 1, 2014, 8 pages. |
International Trucking Shows, “True Composites Platform Highlight of International Trucking Show,” Aug. 1992, 1 page. |
Composite Twisted Rudder, TCC Meeting 2008, handout, 32 pages. |
Composite Marine Control Surface, installed on USS Pioneer (MCM 9), May 1997, 13 pages. |
Trailer/Body Builders, “More Emphasis on Less Weight,” available at http://trailer-bodybuilders.com/trailers/more-emphasis-less-weight, May 1, 2008, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180057059 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62382095 | Aug 2016 | US |