The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 to German Utility Model Application No. 20 2007 007 970.2, filed Jun. 6, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to A mounting frame for supporting sheet-type solar panels comprising, fitted substantially vertically for anchoring by its lower end in the ground or by a fixed anchoring location, a supporting mast at which the solar panels resting on a plane panel support are supported by means of a supporting structure and which are rotatable about the axis of the mast for azimuthal tracking.
Such mounting frames are known in a wealth of different embodiments, additionally provided for tracking the angle of elevation of the solar panels, i.e. tracking the angle of the solar panels relative to the horizontal. In some known models the supporting structure is made up of supporting struts engaging the rear side of the panel support. On other known models the mounting frame mainly consists of just the vertically supporting mast itself engaging the rear side of the corresponding panel support roughly in the middle in supporting the same more or less at just one punctiform location. In these known designs too, using supporting struts, the points at which these stuts engage are located in the middle portion at the rear side of the panel support. The drawback of these prior art mounting frames and panel supports is that they are restricted in their wind and snow loading capacity.
A further drawback of the known mounting frames whose supporting structure is composed of supporting struts is that due to their relatively complicated design these supporting structures need to be welded together at least in part in production and thus make for bulky shipment. This is why the number of mounting frames which can be shipped in a shipping container or similar shipping means is relatively limited.
The object of the invention is to define a mounting frame of the aforementioned kind with a supporting structure for the panel support which withstands high wind and snow loads and which nevertheless, because of its relative simple structure, can now be shipped to the site fully dismantled.
This object is achieved in accordance with the invention by the aspects of the characterizing clause of the appended claim 1.
These features in accordance with the invention bring the advantage that because of the special configuration of the supporting structure the panel support can now be supported at the rear side to a plurality of portions or locations distributed over the full surface area, namely at its lower middle portion and at the two lower side portions thereof as well as at a plurality of locations at the upper rear portion of the panel support as is achieved by the supporting elements additionally provided in accordance with the invention between the upper portion and the central strut forming the hypotenuse of the supporting delta. This supporting delta consists of three central struts in accordance with the invention, secured at the upper mast end to a central supporting part ensures that wind or snow loads generated in the solar panels of the panel support can now be diverted symmetrically into the supporting structure in accordance with the invention, because the supporting delta is arranged symmetrically to the axis of the mast in a substantially horizontally plane and is supported at all of its delta points by supporting struts oriented downswept inclined to a supporting location at the lower end of the mast. It is in this way that the supporting delta secured to the central supporting part together with the supporting struts oriented inclined to the supporting location at the lower end of the mast forms a kind of substructure which symmetrically handles the loads generated by the panel support via struts and supporting elements respectively engaging the rear side of the panel support by directing them into the ground respectively into the fixed anchor location of the supporting mast, minimizing tilt moments of the mounting frame in excluding overloading thereof.
This is rendered all the more favorable by a cost-saving lightweight design of the mounting frame in accordance with the invention, because of which, and in view of its relatively simple design, a mounting frame in accordance with the invention can now be fully assembled on site, enabling it to be shipped totally dismantled. This now makes it possible to ship a much greater number of mounting frames in a shipping container or the like from the production location to the site than is possible with mounting frames needing to be shipped fully or at least partly assembled to the site.
To achieve with a mounting frame in accordance with the invention a fixed angle of elevation, the aspects as set forth in the appended claims 2-4 are particularly suitable for this purpose.
As compared to this, the aspects as set forth in the appended claims 5 and 6 can be used to achieve an adjustable angle of elevation of the solar panels resting on the panel support.
In this context the angle of elevation as set forth in claims 7 and 8 can be set both manually and servo powered. Both of these possibilities are likewise achievable with a mounting frame in accordance with the invention.
The appended claim 9 characterizes a further development of a known panel support contributing towards enhancing the stability as may find application e.g. in a mounting frame in accordance with the invention.
To achieve azimuthal tracking of the solar panels two possibilities exist with a mounting frame in accordance with the invention. One possibility is to anchor the supporting mast at its lower end axially rotatably as set forth in the aspects of the appended claims 10 and 11. In the other possibility in achieving azimuthal tracking of the solar panels the supporting mast is anchored non-rotatably at its lower end whilst as compared to this the supporting structure is rotatable with the central supporting part. This alternative is the basis of the aspects as set forth in the appended claims 12 and 13 which characterize for this purpose expedient and advantageous features.
For this second alternative additional supporting struts may be provided at the lower end of the mast for additional support of the supporting location as is claimed in the appended claim 14. In this second alternative the supporting location at the lower end of the mast can be engineered as a flanged plate as claimed in the appended claims 15 and 16.
The mounting ring as included in the claim 16 at the flanged plate can be non-rotatably held at the flanged plate by the aspects of the appended claim 17.
One advantageous embodiment of this mounting ring is claimed in claims 18 and 19.
The subject matter of claim 20 defines a quick and facilitated means of replacing the mounting ring by parting the two half-shells of the flanged plate.
A configuration of the central supporting part which is particularly suitable for a mounting frame in accordance with the invention is characterized in the claims 21 and 22 by the connecting flanges as provided for permitting quick and facilitated fastening of the struts of the supporting structure.
Whilst the appended claim 23 enumerates suitable materials for a supporting structure in accordance with the invention, as it reads from the appended claim 24 the parts of the supporting structure can be interconnected by bolted and/or welded connections. In this context it is especially the bolted connections that now make it possible to ship the mounting frame in accordance with the invention in a dismantled condition for quick and facilitated assembly on site. It is favorable for this possibility when—as claimed in the appended claim 25—all bolted connections bolts, nuts and any washers as needed are each provided the same in size.
The invention will now be detailed by way of a plurality of example aspects with reference to the attached drawings showing diagrammatically and not to scale:
Like parts are identified by like reference numerals in the drawings and the description of the FIGs. as follows.
Referring now to
Referring now to
For further support of the panel support the supporting structure 14 comprises a plurality of supporting elements provided oriented between the upper transverse rail 9 and the central strut 6a forming the hypotenuse of the supporting delta. In the case of the embodiment of a mounting frame in accordance with the invention as shown in
As evident from
To achieve an adjustable angle of elevation of the solar panels 12 in accordance with the embodiment as shown in
As shown in
Contrary to this, it is, however, just as possible to set the angle of elevation manually by—as shown in FIG. 8—each supporting element 16 and 17 being engineered as a manually telescopically extensible and arrestable supporting strut 18. The arresting is achieved by bolts (not shown) passing through corresponding flush tappings in both parts of the supporting trut. The corresponding pivotal mounting flanges are identified by reference numerals 18a and 18b.
To achieve azimuthal tracking of the solar panels 12 the central supporting part 1 is mounted at the upper mast end and the supporting location 2 at the lower end 13a of the mast axially freely rotatable at the non-rotatably anchored supporting mast 13. For this purpose the central supporting part 1 comprises a center hole 1f (
As further evident from
So that on rotation of the flanged plate 24 the mounting ring 25 is slaved in the motion, jutting inwards from the inner edge of the center hole 24a substantially in the radial direction there is a nose 24b located in the plane of the flanged plate 24. The radial length of this nose is dimensioned to equal, at the most, the radial spacing between the outer circumference of the mast and inner edge of the center hole 24a. Because of this nose 24b the material of the mounting ring 25 is machined away segmentally at 25a (
As evident further from
Should the mounting ring 25 need replacing, quick and facilitated replacement is preferably assured when the flanged plate 24 is configured split and comprising two intersecurable half-shells (not shown) for mounting on the outer circumference of the supporting mast 13 and which can be fixedly interconnected.
Whilst in the embodiment as described thus far, the supporting mast 13 is held non-rotatably and is turned together with the central supporting part 1 and the supporting location 2 at the lower end 13a of the mast relative to the supporting structure 14 for azimuthal tracking, it may also be provided for alternatively that the supporting mast 13 itself is rotationally mount. In this case to achieve azimuthal tracking the supporting structure 14 with the central supporting part 1 and the supporting location 2 are to be non-rotatably connected to the supporting mast. For the lower supporting location 2 this arrangement is illustrated diagrammatically in
It is to be noted in conclusion that galvanized iron, hard aluminum and/or stainless steel can be used as the material for the supporting structure 14, although it is just as possible that other suitable materials may also be employed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2007 007 970 U | Jun 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2534710 | Golian et al. | Dec 1950 | A |
3286270 | Kelly | Nov 1966 | A |
3707720 | Staehlin et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3872854 | Raser | Mar 1975 | A |
4011881 | Becher | Mar 1977 | A |
4129360 | Deflandre et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4156997 | Decker et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4276872 | Blake et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4365618 | Jones | Dec 1982 | A |
4491388 | Wood | Jan 1985 | A |
4558551 | Sevelinge et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
5058565 | Gee et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5798517 | Berger | Aug 1998 | A |
6123067 | Warrick | Sep 2000 | A |
6340956 | Bowen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6485152 | Wood | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6543464 | Grady, II | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566834 | Albus et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6662801 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7172385 | Khajepour et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7357132 | Hayden | Apr 2008 | B2 |
8237098 | Cabanillas Saldana | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020023638 | Buron et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030062037 | Hayden et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20060054162 | Romeo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060096586 | Hayden | May 2006 | A1 |
20080066392 | Sorensen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090014054 | Cano Messeguer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090107484 | Bender | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100059045 | Guinea Diaz et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100101559 | Grant et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007147293 | Dec 2007 | CN |
2740431 | Mar 1979 | DE |
3236506 | Mar 1984 | DE |
8520407 | Sep 1985 | DE |
9408865 | Jul 1994 | DE |
4309259 | Sep 1994 | DE |
9405983 | Aug 1995 | DE |
4443834 | Jun 1996 | DE |
20017249 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10022236 | Nov 2001 | DE |
102005013334 | Sep 2006 | DE |
1 626 140 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1626140 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1632786 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2532727 | Mar 1984 | FR |
56155343 | Dec 1981 | JP |
WO 9300840 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-2004044501 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Machine Translation of DE 8520407U1 published Sep. 26, 1985”, 5 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090320826 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |