The present disclosure relates to mouth guards, kits, and methods.
In accordance with the present disclosure, oral devices and kits are presented, as well as methods of using same, which may be used as mouth guards.
A first aspect of the disclosure is a mouth guard comprising at least one or both of an upper generally arched-shaped member and a lower generally arched-shaped member, wherein:
a) the upper generally arched-shaped member is configured to fit adjacent at least a portion of interior and exterior surfaces of a user's upper dentition, the upper generally arched-shaped member consisting of a moldable polymeric material;
b) the lower generally arched-shaped member consists of the same moldable polymeric material that is configured to fit adjacent at least a portion of interior and exterior surfaces of the user's lower dentition;
c) the lower generally arch-shaped member comprises a posterior lower right molar extension and a posterior lower left molar extension each consisting of the same moldable polymeric material, the posterior lower right and the posterior lower left molar extensions formed integrally with and projecting generally perpendicularly away from the lower generally arch-shaped member and generally toward the upper generally arch-shaped member;
d) the upper generally arch-shaped member comprises a posterior upper right molar extension and a posterior upper left molar extension consisting of the same moldable polymeric material, the posterior upper right and posterior upper left molar extensions formed integrally with and projecting generally perpendicularly away from the upper generally arch-shaped member and generally toward the lower generally arch-shaped member;
e) so that when the user bites or clenches, the posterior upper right molar extension impinges on the posterior lower right molar extension, and the posterior upper left molar extension impinges on the posterior lower left molar extension;
f) the upper and lower generally arch-shaped members having an anterior shape to form a gap ranging from about 5 to about 15 mm and sufficient for at least a portion of the user's tongue to extend forward into the gap without being impeded in forward movement by the apparatus;
g) the posterior lower right molar extension, posterior lower left molar extension, posterior upper right molar extension, and posterior upper left molar extension each configured such that, when the apparatus is in the user's mouth, the molar extensions create a tendency to keep the user's airway open by maintaining the gap.
Any of the apparatus described herein may be part of a kit comprising one or both upper and lower generally arch-shaped members substantially as described herein, in certain embodiments packaged in a carrying case.
A second aspect of the disclosure is a method comprising:
a) inserting one of or both the upper and lower generally arch-shaped members into a users mouth and onto the upper and lower dentitions; and
b) a user wearing one or both of the upper and lower generally arch-shaped members as a mouth guard.
Certain methods may comprise adjusting one or both arch-shaped members to comfortably fit the user's upper and/or lower dentitions.
Further aspects and advantages of apparatus and methods of the present disclosure will become apparent by reviewing the detailed description that follows.
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings are not to scale and illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure, and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the apparatus, kits, and methods of the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments. Identical reference numerals are used throughout the several views for like or similar elements.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the disclosed oral devices, kits and methods of their use. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the oral devices, kits, and methods covered by the claims may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the specifically described embodiments may be possible and are deemed within the claims. All U.S. published patent applications and U.S. Patents referenced herein are hereby explicitly incorporated herein by reference. In the event definitions of terms in the referenced patents and applications conflict with how those terms are defined in the present application, the definitions for those terms that are provided in the present application shall be deemed controlling.
As used herein the phrase “generally arched-shaped” means the shape of a member resembles an arch in the same way that the upper and lower teeth of a user resemble arches. The phrase “adjacent at least a portion of interior and exterior surfaces”, as that term is used herein when referring to the generally arch-shaped members, means that the generally arch-shaped members are adjacent to and touching at least one surface of the upper or lower teeth concerned, but some “looseness” is allowed, so that the members may move away from the teeth slightly, for example if the material of the member stretches or deforms, such as during insertion into or removal from the mouth. As used herein the term “user” means a human or other mammal that employs an apparatus of this disclosure in its mouth. The term “subject” may also be used and is considered interchangeable with the term “user.”
The present disclosure relates generally to apparatus, kits, and methods for use as athletic mouth guards for upper, lower, or both dentitions.
In certain embodiments, the gap (denoted G1 in the various figures) may have a distance ranging from about 1 to about 20 mm, or from about 5 to about 15 mm.
The lateral length (L1 in
In certain embodiments the molar extensions may have a vertical length (L2 in
In certain embodiments the upper and lower members each may comprise a moldable material selected from the group consisting of synthetic and natural materials. Synthetic materials may be selected from the group consisting of polymeric materials, as further discussed herein. In certain apparatus the arch-shaped members and the molar extensions comprise a polymeric material.
In certain embodiments, each molar extension may comprise at least one magnet. In certain embodiments the magnets are embedded in the polymeric material of the molar extensions. In certain embodiments, an upper right magnet has polarity opposite that of a lower right magnet, and an upper left magnet has a polarity opposite that of a lower left magnet. In certain embodiments, the magnets may be flat shaped and embedded into the plastic of the molar extensions. In certain embodiments, such as illustrated in
Referring to
As perhaps more clearly viewed in
As generally may be seen in
The materials of construction of the upper and lower members may comprise any moldable plastic (polymeric) material that is approved for use in oral medical devices and appliances for human use and that may be custom fitted for each user and tooth-retained via friction grip, and materials approved for animal use. The members may comprise a single material, or combination of materials. The members may comprise more than one layer of material, and each layer may be the same or different. The polymeric materials may be filled with various fillers, extenders, pigments, and other additives. Suitable polymeric materials include thermoplastics, thermosetting polymers, elastomers, and thermoplastic elastomers. The polymeric materials may comprise co-polymers, ter-polymers, and blends of two or more chemical types of polymers, or blends of two or more polymers of the same chemical type, for example, a blend of two thermoplastics having different molecular weights.
Examples of specific polymers include polyacrylics, polyvinyls, polyvinyl alcohols, and the like. An example of a suitable polymeric material is a durable fade-proof acrylic that retains its shape and color for at least four-five years. Another example is made of a very pliable, soft, custom-injected silicone. Another example is a polymeric material compatible with home/office based bleaching techniques, such as the material used to make an OSAP device, and materials that can be molded into a ready-made semi-universal trial version, which may be suitable for patients who cannot endure having their impressions taken. In addition, the trial version is an inexpensive way to test a particular patients' tolerance to oral therapy. Another example is the material used in the device known under the trade designation SAGA. This device consists of a hard acrylic shell laminated to a soft vinyl liner. Another example is the acrylic material (Bruxeze™) that softens in hot water to provide a combination of comfort, strength, and retention, and which is used in the Adjustable PM Positioner™, an appliance that fits over all maxillary and mandibular teeth. Another example are the materials used in the device known as SomnoGuard® AP, which consists of an upper and a lower tray each made of two materials. The outer tray shells consist of solid clear and transparent medical grade polycarbonate. The inner lining which accommodates the teeth impressions is made of a thermoplastic copolymer. After the oral appliance is heated in a hot water bath its thermoplastic body molds easily to the teeth and jaws allowing any medical doctor to fit the device chair side. Yet another example is the material employed in the device known as SomnoGuard AP Pro®, which is a dental lab made two-part mandibular adjustable positioner to treat snoring and mild to moderate sleep apnea, and comprises common acrylic/elastomeric thermoform dental materials available in any dental lab after taking impressions of the lower and upper jaws and producing plaster models. Other polymeric materials that may be useful include nitinol, silicone, a PET, or any other biocompatible polymeric material. Other possible examples include PTFE, e-PTFE, polypropylene, polyurethane, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, stainless steel, titanium, tantalum, gold, polyvinidylene fluoride and combinations thereof.
The molar extensions may either be molded using special molds, or built up by applying a paste or solution of polymeric precursor materials and swabbing the precursors materials on the appropriate areas. In certain embodiments, this may need to be done repeatedly to build up the molar extension to functional length.
Magnets which may be useful in apparatus of this disclosure include rare earth magnets, such as samarium-cobalt and neodymium-iron-boron magnets. It has become possible to produce magnets with small enough dimensions for dental applications and yet still provide the necessary forces. Certain embodiments may employ magnets of the “closed field” type. In this type of system, a soft magnetic or ferromagnetic material, such as ferritic or martensitic stainless steel or Pd—Co—Ni alloy, is implanted into the jaw, rather than a magnet, to provide attractive force to hold the denture in place. This implant is known as a “keeper”. In this configuration, the magnetic field lines are shunted through the keeper as it is the path of minimum energy and there is no magnetic field experienced in the oral cavity. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,659,771, 5,678,998, 5,013,243 and 6,299,450 describe small yet powerful magnets for cooperating with a non-magnet implanted “keeper” for denture attachment. The non-magnet keeper is made of a magnet-attracted material, such as a soft magnetic or ferromagnetic material, but is not a permanent magnet. U.S. Pat. No. 4,396,373 describes a removable orthodontic appliance having two permanent magnets carried by two caps, respectively, having facing poles which are in registry when the mouth is normally closed, exerting a magnetic force in a direction substantially normal to the occlusal plane. The opposing magnets have confronting poles with like-polarity such that the magnets repel and develop intrusive forces upon the respective teeth. U.S. Pat. No. 4,671,767 discloses both fixed and removable orthodontic devices that use magnets. The magnets are secured to removable or fixed orthodontic devices and are positioned bilaterally in the posterior molar regions. The faces of the magnets are oriented such that they repel each other, thereby creating magnetic forces parallel to the occlusal plane for urging the mandible forward.
According to U.S. Pat. No. 7,712,468, which discloses a removable magnetic dental appliance, the magnetic orthodontic devices described above employ “open field” magnetic configurations, which are potentially harmful to the local tissues in the oral cavity, especially since the devices are designed for long-term use. Furthermore, the appliances are uncomfortable to wear.
Any of the magnets discussed in these patent and publications would be useable in apparatus and kits disclosed herein.
If desired, fastening means may be employed to fasten one or more of the members in the users mouth. Hook and loop fasteners are common and require no further explanation. One preferred hook and loop fastener is that known under the trade designation Velcro®, available from Velcro USA, Manchester, N.H.
Although the foregoing description is intended to be representative of apparatus, kits, and methods in accordance with the present disclosure, it is not intended to in any way limit the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3132647 | Corniello | May 1964 | A |
3434470 | Strickland | Mar 1969 | A |
4304227 | Samelson | Dec 1981 | A |
4396373 | Dellinger | Aug 1983 | A |
4531916 | Scantlebury et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4671767 | Blechman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676240 | Gardy | Jun 1987 | A |
4700697 | Mundell et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4708646 | Jasper | Nov 1987 | A |
4715368 | George | Dec 1987 | A |
4901737 | Toone | Feb 1990 | A |
5013243 | Tanaka et al. | May 1991 | A |
5056534 | Wright | Oct 1991 | A |
5117816 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5239995 | Estes et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5499633 | Fenton | Mar 1996 | A |
RE35295 | Estes et al. | Jul 1996 | E |
5570704 | Buzzard et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611355 | Hilsen | Mar 1997 | A |
5678998 | Honkura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683244 | Truax | Nov 1997 | A |
5692521 | Leasure-Nelson | Dec 1997 | A |
6074207 | Coats | Jun 2000 | A |
6082363 | Washburn | Jul 2000 | A |
6109265 | Frantz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6213959 | Kushida | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6299450 | Honkura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6427689 | Estes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6491037 | Mortenson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505625 | Uenishi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6659771 | Honkura et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6766802 | Keropian | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7107992 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7178529 | Kownacki | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7225021 | Park et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7255110 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7322356 | Critzer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7451767 | Keropian | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7540843 | De Backer | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7607439 | Li | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7637262 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7712468 | Hargadon | May 2010 | B2 |
7810502 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
8061358 | Smernoff | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8215312 | Garabadian et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257079 | Plowman | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8272866 | Chun et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8875713 | Metz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881733 | Harkins | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9144512 | Wagner | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9204991 | Harkins | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9408743 | Wagner | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9439802 | Wagner | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9445938 | Wagner | Sep 2016 | B1 |
10299957 | Wagner | May 2019 | B2 |
11273071 | Wagner | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20010027793 | Tielemans | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040177852 | Abramson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050121039 | Brooks et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050236003 | Meader | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060252685 | Gould | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289013 | Keropian | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070283967 | Bailey | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080060660 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080173312 | Peake et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199824 | Hargadon | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210244 | Keropian | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257358 | Stern et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264422 | Fishman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276938 | Jeppeson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036889 | Callender | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056724 | Keropian | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120448 | Keropian | May 2009 | A1 |
20090188510 | Palmer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100211184 | Rousseau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224197 | Keropian | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300458 | Stubbs et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1205157 | May 2002 | EP |
1203570 | Nov 2011 | EP |
WO 2007134375 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2010040026 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010062952 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093264 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bailey, Premarket Notification [510(k)] Summary K013049 for mandibular repositioning appliance (device) known as NOrAD(TM), clearance granted by United States FDA, Nov. 29, 2001. |
Bailey, Premarket Notification [510(k)] Summary K020893 for mandibular repositioning appliance (device) known as NOrAD(TM), clearance granted by United States FDA, May 28, 2002. |
Britishsnoring; Tomed SomnoGuard FittingHeated for 20 seconds, YouTube video, uploaded to the Internet by britishsnoring on Apr. 26, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXfN76M2I1A. |
Department of Health & Human Services; K964516; Letter to James Bonds of Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Incorporated; Jun. 2, 2005; Rockville, MD; US. |
Dynasplint; Wearing your Jaw Dynasplint® System, YouTube video, uploaded to the Internet by dynasplint on Oct. 5, 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hjP24aByd4. |
European Patent Office; “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee” for PCT/US2012/036474; dated Jul. 25, 2012; Rijswijk; Netherlands. |
European Patent Office; International Search Report for PCT/US2012/036474; 6 pages, dated Sep. 9, 2012; Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
European Patent Office; Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2012/036474, 12 pages, dated Sep. 9, 2012; Munich, Germany. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K033822, Feb. 6, 2004. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K033823, Feb. 6, 2004. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K042161, Oct. 27, 2004. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K061688, Sep. 8, 2006. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K102118, Sep. 8, 2010; Ranir, LLC, 510(k) Summary K102118 for Intraoral Anti-Snoring Device known as Snore Guard Advance(TM), clearance granted by United States FDA, Sep. 8, 2010. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K121761, Sep. 28, 2012. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K962516, Sep. 10, 1996. |
FDA 510(k) Summary K972061, Aug. 21, 2007; Thornton; Non-Confidential Summary of Safety and Effectiveness; K972061; Aug. 21, 1997; Dallas, TX; US. |
FDA 510(k) Summary; Wagner Direct; FDA 501K Summary; Apr. 15, 2014; Houston, Texas; US. |
Hoffstein; “Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing”, Sleep Breath (2007) 11 :1-22, published online Nov. 29, 2006, Springer-Verlag; Germany. |
Houston-Chronicle; “Tired of Your CPAP?”, Jan. 16, 2011. |
I Hate Crap!; “Sleep Apnea Appliances, I Hate CPAP!”, p. 1-8, downloaded from the Internet Oct. 25, 2010; http://www.ihatecpap.com/oral_appliances.html'; Illinois; US. |
Landers, SJ, “Link strengthened between sleep apnea and mortality risk”, amednews, Sept. 1, 2008; American Medical Association; US. |
Pancer, et al., “Evaluation of Variable Mandibular Advancement Appliance for Treatment of Snoring and Sleep Apnea”, Chest (1999); 116:1511-1518; Clinical Investigations; US. |
Prehn, Ronald S “What is a Mandibular Advancement Splint and How Does it Work?”, YouTube video, uploaded to the Internet by rsprehn on Mar. 4, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWiQQF4xQZc. |
Randerath et al., “Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnea”, Eur Respir J (no month, 2011); vol. 37, No. 5; pp. 1000-1028; Paris, France. |
Sybron Dental Specialties; 510(k) Summary K070327 for Intraoral Devices for Snoring and Intraoral Devices for Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea known as Removable Acrylic Herbst(TM), Allesee Snore Appliance(TM), and Enoch Snorinator(TM), clearance granted by United States FDA, May 25, 2007; Sturtevant, WI; US. |
Somnomed; Sleep Apnea Appliances; I hate CPAP; Oct. 25, 2010; 8 pages; US. |
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,768, filed Jun. 13, 2016, with Terminal Disclaimer; 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,768 dated Jun. 3, 2016; 8 pages. |
Amendment after Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,682, filed Aug. 15, 2015; 7 pages. |
Amendment and Response for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,682, filed Feb. 18, 2015; 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/456,682 dated Dec. 17, 2014; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fees Due with Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772 dated Jun. 24, 2016; 7 pages. |
Amendment and Response for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772, filed May 17, 2016; 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772 dated May 3, 2016; 8 pages. |
Supplemental Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772, filed Mar. 17, 2016; 14 pages. |
Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772, filed Jan. 22, 2016; 20 pages. |
Amendment and Response for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772, filed Jun. 27, 2015; 20 pages. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,772 dated Apr. 27, 2015; 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due with Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,116 dated Aug. 10, 2016; 7 pages. |
Amendment and Response for U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,116, filed Jul. 18, 2016, with Terminal Disclaimer; 4 pages. |
USPTO Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,116 dated Jul. 13, 2016; 11 pages. |
USPTO Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 15/251,902 dated Oct. 3, 2018; 51 pages. |
Response for U.S. Appl. No. 15/251,902, filed Jan. 3, 2019, with 2 Terminal Disclaimers; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance and Fee Due with Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 15/251,902 dated Feb. 19, 2019; 20 pages. |
USPTO Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 16/162,234 dated Oct. 26, 2021; 68 pages. |
Response for U.S. Appl. No. 16/162,234, filed Nov. 3, 2021, with 2 Terminal Disclaimers; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance and Fee Due with Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 16/162,234 dated Dec. 2, 2021; 69 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220273485 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16416234 | May 2019 | US |
Child | 17695373 | US |