The present invention broadly relates to oilfield applications. This invention relates to a movable well bore cleaning device for attachment to a well casing or the like, and more particularly to a movable well bore cleaning device adapted for cleaning the well bore wall before and during cement placement in a subterranean reservoir, such as for instance oil and/or gas reservoir or a water reservoir.
At the completion of every oil and gas drilling operation, whether the operation results in production or a dry hole, it is necessary that some cementing be done in the bore hole. In the case of production, the casing must be cemented in the hole for support thereof and prevention of the flow of fluids between formations. In the case of a dry hole, cement plugs must be set at various depths to seal various formations.
When cementing casing, the casing is run into and centered in the hole and then cement is pumped down through the casing to displace the drilling mud from the annulus. When setting a plug, a pipe of relatively small diameter is run into the hole to the depth of the bottom of the plug and cement is pumped through the pipe to displace the mud above the end of the pipe until a plug of sufficient length has been formed at which time the pipe is withdrawn from the hole and the cement is allowed to harden.
In all cases, it is necessary that the walls of the bore hole be cleaned of mud cake and the like so that the cement will bond properly with the formation. Failure to remove unreactive solids between the cement sheath and the formation will leave a potential axial flow path for formation fluids, hence compromising hydraulic isolation.
Mechanical well bore wall cleaning is accomplished by means of devices known as scratchers. Non-mechanical means of cleaning the well—based for instance on the use of wash fluids flowing in turbulent flow—are being used, but they are felt as being less efficient. The turbulent action of wash fluids can be enhanced by placing passive obstacles in the flow conduit that disturb laminar flow.
There are two basic types of scratchers: reciprocating and rotating. Reciprocating scratchers are designed to operate when the casing or pipe to which they are attached is moved axially within the bore hole and they usually include a single collar having a plurality of wire bristles or flat loops of wire extending radially to contact the well bore wall. Another type of reciprocating scratcher includes a pair of collars having a plurality of spiraling wires connecting the collars and a plurality of fingers extending radially outwardly and upwardly from the upper collar, which help cleaning the well bore wall when the casing or pipe is reciprocated.
Rotating type scratchers are designed to operate when the casing or pipe to which they are attached is rotated and include an axially extending strip having thereon a plurality of radially outwardly extending loops or bristles or a combination of loops and bristles. There is an additional rotating scratcher which includes a helical strip having thereon a plurality of radially outwardly extending bristles.
Reciprocating scratchers clean only when reciprocated; rotating scratchers, with the exception of the helical strip type which cleans to a limited extent while reciprocated, clean only when rotated.
In summary, there are a number of existing scratchers that work during casing or pipe reciprocation and/or rotation. Some of them are disclosed in patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,750,558; and 3,390,725. However, all existing scratchers require casing movement to work. In other words, if casing or pipe movement is not feasible, which might be a common case due to different reasons, these scratchers are not useful. None of these solutions work when the tubular remain static.
There are other devices used for different purposes (casing or pipe centralization), know as centralizers. Some of them (in instance: SpiraGlider) consist of a steel centralizer and two asymmetrically-beveled stop collars. The shape of both centralizer and collars is designed to minimize running resistance. The unique stop collar performs both as a positioning device and provides protection to the leading edge of the centralizer. It is designed specifically for highly inclined or horizontal wells and is ideal for use with liner hangers. This configuration allows the centralizer to rotate and also allows a certain degree of axial movement. These movements have the objective of making easier running the casing or pipe. However, they are not designed to work as scratchers, neither to rotate and/or move axially using the fluids flow to induce such movements.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a movable well bore cleaning device (flow-induced scratcher) that will clean independently of casing movement. It is a further object of the present invention to use the fluids annular flow as the driving force to rotate or move axially mechanical scratchers.
In a first aspect, a device for cleaning a wellbore is disclosed, said device comprises a tubular section, a helical scratcher mounted thereof wherein said helical scratcher contains flexible wires characterized in that the helical scratcher is able to rotate axially to tubular section when a fluid flows axially to tubular section.
Preferably, the device comprises at least two helical scratchers mounted on the tubular section, wherein the two helical scratchers are connected through a cleaning wire and further comprising a restoring aid connected on one side to tubular section and on the other side on one of the helical scratchers. Alternatively, the device can further comprise, on the helical scratcher, a cone like structure to create a jet with the fluid.
In a second aspect, a method to clean a wellbore wall of a well is disclosed, said method comprises the steps of: incorporating a device as previously described into the wellbore; moving the device in the well and allowing the fluid flowing axially to the wellbore wall to rotate the scratcher; removing deposit at wellbore wall; leaving a cleaned wellbore wall.
Preferably, the method further comprises the step of selecting a zone of interest and using one scratcher above the zone of interest and a second scratcher below the zone of interest.
Further embodiments of the present invention can be understood with the appended drawings.
The flow of fluid 5 circulating axially in the wellbore imparts a rotating movement to the blades that, upon rotation, scratches any fragile deposit on the wellbore wall along the full length of the rotating scratcher. This fragile deposit may be made of filter cake, settled solids (barite or cuttings) or other kind of debris. The removed material is cleaned out of the hole by the flow of the annular fluid and leaves a cleaned wellbore wall 3.
The deposit 2 is this fully replaced by the circulating fluid. If the circulating fluid is a cement slurry, it will bond with the formation upon setting and provide an efficient hydraulic isolation barrier in the annulus. The hydraulic isolation in regions with a cleaned wellbore wall 3 will be much better than in untreated places without scratchers because the presence of a fragile deposit at the cement-formation interface presents an easy leakage path.
In a second embodiment, the wellbore cleaning device is equipped with a plurality of rotating scratchers on the tubular, placed at different depths along the tubular to ensure several hydraulic isolation sections along the well (
In a third embodiment, the wellbore cleaning device is able to rotate radially and also move axially.
As for the rotating cleaning device described before, the flow of the fluid circulating axially in the wellbore imparts a rotating movement to the rings which, upon rotation, will scratch any fragile deposit on the wellbore wall along the full length of the rotating scratcher. This fragile deposit may be made of filter cake, settled solids (barite or cuttings) or other kind of debris. The removed material is cleaned out of the hole by the flow of the annular fluid.
The deposit is thus fully replaced by the circulating fluid. If this circulating fluid is a cement slurry, it will bond with the formation upon setting and provide an efficient hydraulic isolation barrier in the annulus. This hydraulic isolation will be much better than in places without scratchers because the presence of a fragile deposit at the cement-formation interface presents an easy leakage path.
Preferably, the tubular will be equipped with a plurality of rotating and reciprocating scratchers, placed at different depths along the tubular to ensure several hydraulic isolation sections along the well.
In a fourth embodiment, the wellbore cleaning device comprises one or more cones 700 in the wings or helicoidal part of the cleaning device to allow the circulating fluid to enter a cone and create a jet that can further clean (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08290767 | Aug 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/005547 | 7/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/19/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/017899 | 2/18/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
85622 | Taylor | Jan 1869 | A |
1600578 | Crickmer | Sep 1926 | A |
1758995 | Armstrong et al. | May 1930 | A |
2215514 | MacGregor | Sep 1940 | A |
2220237 | Hall | Nov 1940 | A |
2224412 | Smith | Dec 1940 | A |
2287319 | Miller | Jun 1942 | A |
2509492 | Gould | May 1950 | A |
2867280 | De Jarnett | Jan 1959 | A |
2969115 | Tripplehorn | Jan 1961 | A |
3087550 | Tyrrell, Jr. | Apr 1963 | A |
3141505 | Tripplehorn | Jul 1964 | A |
3390725 | Alexander, Jr. | Jul 1968 | A |
4612986 | Fosdick et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4747452 | Clark | May 1988 | A |
4750558 | Alexander, Jr. | Jun 1988 | A |
6523612 | Reynolds | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6832655 | Ravensbergen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7121336 | Hatley | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7210529 | Ruttley | May 2007 | B2 |
7383881 | Telfer | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7753128 | Moen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20040089323 | Hatley | May 2004 | A1 |
20060185853 | Bender | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070261855 | Brunet et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20120211229 | Fielder et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130192818 | Winn et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0523236 | Jan 1993 | EP |
1594265 | Sep 1990 | SU |
1686131 | Oct 1991 | SU |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for the equivalent PCT patent application No. PCT/EP2009/005547 issued on Sep. 23, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110266000 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |