This application is for entry into the U.S. National Phase under §371 for International Application No. PCT/GB2012/000694 having an international filing date of Aug. 31, 2012, and from which priority is claimed under all applicable sections of Title of the United States Code including, but not limited to, Sections 120, 363, and 365(c), and which in turn claims priority under 35 USC 119 to United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1115940.7 filed on Sep. 14, 2011.
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a movement joint, in particular of the type used in the laying of concrete, remaining in place thereafter and allowing free movement of concrete slabs on opposite sides of the joint.
Description of the Related Art
Movement joints are provided between concrete slabs to allow them to separate at intended joint lines as the concrete shrinks on curing after laying.
Many joints include a divider between adjacent slabs and against which concrete is poured. In this respect, the joints perform the function of concrete shuttering. In this specification, we refer to such a joint as a “construction joint”. In a construction joint the divider will be suited to the nominal depth of the concrete. It may not be the full depth of the slabs in that the sub-base on which the concrete is laid may not be sufficiently level for the divider to abut the sub-base along the entire length of the joint. In such situation, some concrete can be expected to pass under the divider, but the depth will be sufficient for the concrete to be tamped level with the top of the joint.
The edges or arrises of the concrete at a joint require support against spalling, that is breaking off in shear and/or impact as from forklift truck tyres.
Many forms of arris protection have been used. One early example, left in situ from casting, was the use of angle irons set up on wooden shuttering.
More recently strip steel on edge has been used, anchored into the concrete, normally by means of a number of studs angled down and extending towards the body of the slab. A typical construction joint of this type is shown in our patent application No EP 1,867,783. It's abstract is:
Despite providing a good measure of protection against spalling, this joint has an inherent problem in that, wherever a joint is straight and has opened to tens of millimeters, due to tyres, typically of a fork lift truck having solid tyres and little or no sprung suspension, dropping partially into the opening and striking against the opposite side of the joint. The resulting impacts are liable to cause eventual deterioration of the joint.
Various arrangements have been provided for further reinforcement of the arrises including plates set flush with the surface of the concrete, as developments of the use of angle irons. Amongst these developments are plates extending across the opening in the joint. Further, these plates can have interdigitated edges, whereby a tyre passing across the joint encounters a sinusoidal gap between the plates. This is advantageous in preventing the simultaneous impact across the width of a tyre passing over the gap.
Such sinuosity has been provided not only in horizontal plates but also in arris members extending down from the surface of the concrete having the joint. These sinusoidal arris members have been mounted on top of vertical members extending lower into the joint. This makes for cost and complexity in fabrication.
The object of the present invention is to provide an improved free movement, construction joint.
According to the invention there is provided a free movement, arris protection, construction joint for dividing the concrete during pouring of slabs on opposite sides of the joint, the joint having a top-to-bottom depth in its use orientation, giving this depth to the slabs, the joint comprising:
a pair of elongate fabrications one for each side of the joint and means for frangibly connecting the formations together, the fabrications including:
Whether one only or both of the wave shaped arris protection members extends to the full depth of the joint, it imparts the wave shape to the concrete to the depth of the joint at least, as joint opens. Not only does this arrangement provide for progressive load transfer from one slab to the next as a vehicle crosses the joint, but the portions of the concrete extending furthest towards the other slab do not react the load applied to them as unsupported fingers in bending, but as columns in compression—in which stress state concrete is well known to be stronger.
The wave form can be curved such as sinusoidal, or angular as in saw tooth, triangular or square. The preferred wave form is trapezoidal, in maximising the range of the angles of approach of vehicles to the joint in which progressive load transfer is achieved.
As intimated above, both arris protection members can have the same depth in the joint. However, in some embodiments, one of the arris protection members, although being flush at the intended concrete level, is not so deep at as the other, divider one.
Preferably the anchor features are comprised of continuous welded on members, the welding conveniently being at the furthest extent of the arris-protection/divider members from the mid plane of the joint, that is at lateral wave peaks. In the preferred embodiment, the members are angle members with apertures punched for anchoring in the concrete. Alternatively the anchoring members can be lengths of reinforcing bar, again welded to the lateral wave peaks and anchoring at their extent through the concrete between the peaks.
Whilst it is envisaged that the or additional anchoring features could be provided close to the flush edges of the arris-protection/divider members, this is not expected to be necessary with these members being wave shaped and the anchoring features as preferably set down from the flush edges.
As normal for free movement, arris protection, construction joints, the divider member is preferably provided with welded-in-place dowels extending plainly outwards of the mid-plane on the divider side and having sleeves in their extent on the other side of the joint for transferring vertical load between the slabs on opposite sides of the joint. The dowels may be of the plate or bar type.
Preferably, the ends of the joint are complementarily formed for connection of another such joint to the end of the joint, the joint having:
a portion of one arris protection member extending beyond the other at one end,
a complementary portion of other arris protection member extending beyond the one at the other end and
means for frangibly connecting the said portions together for connecting the joint to another such joint.
Further it is preferred that part of the anchoring means at the side of the joint having the one portion extends onto and is fixed onto the one portion and is fixed onto the other end of the side of the joint short of the complementary portion of the other arris protection member.
To help understanding of the invention, a specific embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to the drawings, a free movement, arris protection, construction joint 1 has a pair of arris protection members 2,3 formed complementarily from strips of sheet with a continuous trapezium wave form. A divider one 2 of the members is typically 100 mm deep for a nominal 0.1 m deep slab. The other one 3 is typically 50 mm deep. The members are of 2 mm steel plate, either mild (possibly galvanised) or stainless.
The wave form is comprised of flanges 4,5, typically extending 150 mm in the length of the joint and of webs 6, extending at 45° to the flanges and the length of the joint. The flanges 4,5 are spaced 150 mm on opposite sides of a mid-plane 7 of the joint. The members 2,3 are bolted together with flangible nylon bolts 8, with their top (in use) edges flush.
Welded to the outer ones of the flanges are L strips 9 having apertures 10 in their flats 11 extending from the flanges for anchoring the joint to its slabs. The bolts pass through welded on ones 12 of the flats of the divider plate anchor strip.
Beneath the anchor members, extending out from every other flat 5 of the deep divider one 2 of the protection members are load transfer dowels 14, with sleeves 15 on their extent across the mid-plane and beyond.
In
Turning now to
The outside/longer ones of the flanges 104,105 have two lengths of 8 mm rebar welded to them. Three of four of these lengths 91,92,93 are set 30 mm from the edges of the members. The fourth 94 is set 60 mm from its respective edge. At this level it has 20×20 mm square dowels 140 extending above it, the dowels being welded to this bar and to the joint member having this rebar welded to it. The dowels are provided at every other peak of the sinuosity of the joint on one side thereof. They extend 160 mm from the rebar. On the other side of the joint, the dowels extend by 200 mm and each has a plastic sleeve 150. This further extension allows for 40 mm of joint opening and still the same 160 mm within the sleeve, for load transfer. This arrangement places the dowels below one third of the depth of the joint, whereby they are not liable to be cut into if and when the slabs are saw cut for stress relief—normally to one third the depth of the slab. On the other hand, the upper anchoring rebar lengths 91,92 are within the top third of the depth of the joint and are liable to be cut into in saw cutting. Nevertheless, they retain their efficacy in anchoring the joint members at the saw cut due to their regular welding to the flanges of the members.
It will be noted that the joint members 102,103 have a series of apertures 110,111 for known supports to hold the joint at installation height above the sub-base 112. The apertures are provided in pairs on adjacent flanges 104,105 on opposite sides of the joint, whereby the joint can be supported from either side. Further, the joint members are frangibly connected together by nylon bolts 80 spaced along the joint between the dowels and at the same height as them. Further frangible bolts 81 and wing nuts 82 are provided for interconnecting joints end to end for an extended joint. At one end of the individual joints, the rebar lengths 92,94 are welded onto an outer flange 105, with the inner flange being omitted here. At the other end, the inner flange 105 is present, and the rebar lengths are welded to the ends of the web 106 of their joint member. The ends are complementary and are bolted together in use by a bolt 81 and wing nut 82. This arrangement provides continuity along the joint of divider capability for concrete pouring.
Once slabs 155, 156 are cast on opposite sides of the joint, the rebar lengths are embedded in the concrete for anchoring of the joint members. The slabs extend as inter-digitated castellations 160,170 separated by the sinuosity of the joint. The castellations extend to the sub-base 112. Progressive load transfer from one slab to the next can the appreciated from
The invention is not intended to be restricted to the details of the above described embodiments. For instance, other sinuous wave forms could be used in particular sinusoidal. Further it is not essential for both of the arris protection members of the joint to be of full slab depth. For deep slabs, material can be economise on by the bottom of one stopping short of full depth. With such an arrangement, one rebar anchor can be envisaged for this member but two will normally be provided.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1115940.7 | Sep 2011 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2012/000694 | 8/31/2012 | WO | 00 | 3/11/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/038123 | 3/21/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1495305 | Heltzel | May 1924 | A |
2031371 | Kerr | Feb 1936 | A |
2419022 | Heltzel | Apr 1947 | A |
2521643 | Mathers | Sep 1950 | A |
3059553 | Woolley | Oct 1962 | A |
4050207 | Bertschmann et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4332504 | Arai | Jun 1982 | A |
4936704 | Killmeyer | Jun 1990 | A |
5088256 | Face, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5366319 | Hu et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5826391 | Underwood | Oct 1998 | A |
8376652 | Bradford | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20040016065 | Steiger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050066600 | Moulton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060059804 | Brown | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070199267 | Moor | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 015 453 | Apr 2005 | BE |
35 33 077 | Mar 1987 | DE |
1 389 648 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1 867 783 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2 848 581 | Jun 2004 | FR |
2 421 049 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2007144008 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140366472 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |