Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to techniques for determining the rotational orientation of a platform moving in space.
Description of the Related Art
It is often necessary to know the rotational orientation of a moving body or platform along with its spatial location. For example, it may be necessary to know the orientation of a moving projectile such as a missile in order to provide the missile with appropriate guidance data.
Several techniques are used to provide rotational orientation data of this sort. For example, it may be possible to determine the orientation of a moving platform by means of a radar system. However, such systems tend to be large, costly, consume large amounts of power and are easy to detect. Another approach is to affix accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, etc. to the platform; however, these devices tend to be expensive, bulky and complex.
It may also be possible to determine the rotational orientation of a moving platform by imaging it as it moves. However, this is likely to be difficult if conditions are turbulent or otherwise less than ideal and may be impossible if the projectile is small and rapidly spinning.
Another approach, described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/531,918, employs an optical link between a transmitter and the moving platform to determine the rotational orientation of the platform. The transmitter preferably directs a linearly polarized laser beam towards the moving platform, and an ellipsometric detector capable of detecting the polarized beam when within the line-of-sight of the transmitter and measuring its polarization state is mounted to the moving platform. The polarization angle indicates the rotational orientation of the moving platform with respect to the predefined coordinate system. However, an optical link of this sort may suffer from problems due to certain environmental conditions. For example, an infrared laser does not efficiently penetrate fog, clouds, rain or dust.
A moving platform roll angle determination system is presented which addresses several of the problems noted above, providing a robust means of determining the rotational orientation of a moving platform through all weather conditions.
The present moving platform roll angle measurement system includes a transmitter which includes a transmitting antenna that generates at least one radio frequency (RF) signal, with the transmitted RF signals having known but different polarizations with respect to a predefined coordinate system. The system also includes at least one moving platform, each of which includes a receiving antenna capable of receiving the polarized RF signals. The transmitter and receiving antenna are arranged such that the roll angle of a moving platform can be determined based on the received RF signals.
In one embodiment, the transmitter generates two orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals, and the receiving antenna is a linearly polarized antenna which receives the two orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals. The roll angle is then determined based on the ratio of the power amplitudes of the received orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals.
In another embodiment, the transmitter generates one linearly polarized RF signal and the receiving antenna is a dual-polarized antenna which receives the linearly polarized RF signal and produces first and second output signals which represent the power amplitudes of the received linearly polarized RF signal at first and second orthogonal polarizations, respectively. The roll angle is then determined based on the ratio of the power amplitudes of the first and second output signals. The transmitter may be arranged to encode information into the RF signals by modulating one or both of the transmitted orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals; the information may include, for example, guidance commands.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, descriptions, and claims.
The basic principles of a roll angle measurement system for a moving platform per the present invention are illustrated in
This determination of roll angle may be accomplished in a number of ways. For example, transmitter 12 can be arranged to generate two orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals. Receiving antenna 20 is a linearly polarized antenna which receives the two orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals, with the roll angle θ determined based on the ratio of the power amplitudes (P1, P2) of the received orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals. This is illustrated in
Alternatively, transmitter 12 can be arranged to generate one linearly polarized RF signal. Receiving antenna 20 is a dual-polarized antenna which receives the linearly polarized RF signal and produces first and second output signals (P1, P2) which represent the power amplitudes of the received linearly polarized RF signal at first and second orthogonal polarizations, respectively. Roll angle θ can then be determined based on the ratio of the power amplitudes of P1 and P2.
By establishing a communications link between transmitter 12 and moving platform 18 using RF signals, problems that can adversely affect an optical communications link, such as signal attenuation due to environmental conditions like fog, clouds, rain or dust, are avoided. In this way, an all-weather, day-night communications link which enables roll angle to be determined can be established. The wavelengths of the RF signals are preferably long enough to avoid attenuation due to weather conditions and any disadvantageous atmospheric absorption lines. Frequencies in the range of 30-300 GHz are acceptable, with frequencies in the range of 100-250 GHz preferred. The transmitter 12 and receiver (not shown) can be implemented in numerous ways; a heterodyne-based architecture is preferred.
A simplified diagram of one possible embodiment is shown in
The roll angle θ is then determined based on the trigonometric ratio of the power amplitudes P1, P2 of the orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals. Roll angle θ may be calculated with, for example, an on-board electronics module 39.
The present system can be arranged such that information can be encoded into the transmitted RF signals, by modulating one or both of transmitted signals. Such information might include guidance commands. Some moving platforms are capable of altering their direction when moving using flaps or other devices which can be actuated in response to guidance commands. The present system can be arranged such that the transmitter encodes such guidance commands into the RF signals, by modulating one or both of transmitted orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals 30, 32. The modulation can be any of a number of types, including amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, or phase modulation. The transmitter preferably modulates the power amplitudes of one or both of the transmitted orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals. The modulated signals are then received by the moving platform's receiving antenna and the moving platform is preferably arranged to decode the guidance commands by determining the sum of the power amplitudes of the received orthogonal linearly polarized RF signals.
Another possible embodiment 48 of the present system is shown in
Dual-polarized receiving antenna 56 might also be a horn antenna having a square or round shape, coupled to a diplexer so that both polarizations can be output. Horn antennas typically provide a high degree of polarization discrimination, and can be machined into the moving platform.
The receiving antenna should be structurally strong, as it would typically be located at the back of the moving platform and thus subject to significant forces when the platform is launched. The moving platform is often spinning around a longitudinal axis as it moves; as such, the antenna is preferably rotationally symmetric around the longitudinal axis to avoid precession. The antennas are preferably inexpensive to manufacture in quantity, sized appropriately for the moving platform, and narrow band to avoid jamming.
As with the embodiment described above, the embodiment shown in
One advantage with an RF signal-based system as described herein is that, due to the broad coverage range inherent in RF signals, one transmitter can be arranged to generate RF signals such that the roll angle of multiple moving platforms can be determined simultaneously. This might be accomplished by assigning unique frequencies to each platform and then transmitting linearly polarized signals as described above on each of the assigned frequencies.
The moving platform might be any device that is designed to be propelled through space. For example, the moving platform may be a steerable projectile such as a bullet.
One problem that might be encountered is that the P1 and P2 values will be the same whether the roll angle is X, or X+180°. This ‘up/down’ ambiguity is referred to as degeneracy in roll position. The present system may be arranged to overcome this degeneracy by forcing a flight path deviation. By tracking the platform's path after the deviation is effected, the up/down ambiguity can be resolved. Once the ambiguity has been resolved, the correct orientation can always be determined unambiguously by tracking the roll angle.
To force a flight path deviation, the moving platform would typically be arranged to be able to vary its trajectory in response to guidance commands encoded into the transmitted RF signals. Such a platform would typically include a control device which affects the path of the platform when actuated, and which rotates with the platform. For example, as shown in
For example, for an embodiment such as that shown in
Similarly, for an embodiment such as that shown in
It may also be possible to track the up/down orientation by monitoring the summed powers (P1+P2), which will be modulated by the precession of the platform in response to the forced flight path deviation.
Up/down ambiguity might also be resolved by means of ‘beamsteering’, which requires that the receiving antenna be capable of having a directional reception pattern or ‘beam’. One example of an antenna having this capability is a patch antenna. Here, degeneracy is overcome by breaking the symmetry of the beam about the receiving antenna's axis of rotation. For example, as shown in
If the system is arranged as shown in
When so arranged, the receiving antenna beam for one or both frequencies/polarizations is pointed off-axis. The power modulation at the frequency of rotation is then monitored to determine ‘up’ versus ‘down’. The received signal power will be a sine wave with a period equal to the rotation of the platform; however, the amplitude of the sine wave decreases as the platform travels away from the transmitter. This would result in an amplitude profile sin(x)/(R2), where R is the distance between the platform and transmitter. This can be approximated by a damped sine wave.
Up/down ambiguity might also be resolved using radiometry. The black body radiation of the sky is shifted with respect to that of the ground; this shift can be detected as the moving platform rotates to determine ‘up’ versus ‘down’. As illustrated in
The embodiment shown in
The present system provides a number of benefits. Establishing an RF link between the transmitter and a moving platform as described herein provides a connection that is robust, even in an extremely turbulent environment. This is further aided by the use of polarization as a means to determine orientation, as polarization is less affected by atmospheric turbulence and scattering. The RF signals are subject to negligible refractive index gradients, and can be made to produce a uniform transmitted field intensity, while their source is difficult to detect. The distance between the transmitter and moving platform can be extended as needed, by simply increasing the power of the transmitted RF signals. Furthermore, due to the availability of high power sources, the transmitter can have a relatively low gain.
The embodiments of the invention described herein are exemplary and numerous modifications, variations and rearrangements can be readily envisioned to achieve substantially equivalent results, all of which are intended to be embraced within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3594085 | Wilmanns | Jul 1971 | A |
4097007 | Fagan et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4256368 | Task | Mar 1981 | A |
4318591 | Elterman | Mar 1982 | A |
4520362 | Charlot | May 1985 | A |
4737793 | Munson | Apr 1988 | A |
5007692 | Matsuura | Apr 1991 | A |
5038150 | Bains | Aug 1991 | A |
5039029 | Taylor | Aug 1991 | A |
5042951 | Gold et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5099246 | Skagerlund | Mar 1992 | A |
5200606 | Krasutsky et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5218582 | Marchant | Jun 1993 | A |
5272351 | Andressen | Dec 1993 | A |
5344099 | Pittman | Sep 1994 | A |
5414430 | Hansen | May 1995 | A |
5574479 | Odell | Nov 1996 | A |
5708583 | Solenne et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757671 | Drevillon et al. | May 1998 | A |
7023380 | Schneider | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7345625 | Urkowitz | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7589663 | Goldman | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7969357 | Russo | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7977613 | Rastegar et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8009292 | Choi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8106811 | Vander Velde | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8169612 | Gao | May 2012 | B2 |
8258999 | Rastegar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8269667 | Vander Velde et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8749430 | Shinonaga | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9625565 | Eidloth | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20040200947 | Lau | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060192961 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080316463 | Okada et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100052981 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100328644 | Lu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130169477 | Luo et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Wikipedia article, “Heterodyne”, Oct. 26, 2014 version. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160134378 A1 | May 2016 | US |