The present invention relates generally to brushless direct current motors.
Typical motors with round stator laminations work well in many applications. However, some motor applications require significant torque from the motor, yet also require that the motor housing be small enough so as not to interfere with operation of the device incorporating the motor. By way of non-limiting example, a cylindrical mower for cutting grass on a golf course fairway or sports field requires more torque than a cylindrical mower for cutting finer grass on a putting green to achieve a clean cut. However, use of a conventional motor having round stator laminations to rotate a cylindrical blade reel of a fairway or sports field mower about a horizontal axis presents a problem. The conventional motor, which is mounted at an axial end of the blade reel and is situated very close to the ground, has a round bottom that applies some downward pressure to the grass. This tends to lay the grass down, which is cosmetically undesirable on golf courses, sports fields, or other highly-visible areas where such “layover” is considered unattractive.
What is needed is an improved motor design capable of providing sufficient torque within a reduced spatial envelope.
The invention provides a motor useful for powering rotation of a blade reel of a cylindrical mower. The motor comprises a rotor having a plurality of pole magnets angularly spaced about the rotor's rotational axis through an angle of 360°, and a stator including a plurality of windings angularly spaced about the rotational axis through an angle less than 360° to provide an angular section free of windings, wherein at least one of the plurality of pole magnets is not radially opposite any of the plurality of windings at any given rotational position of the rotor.
The internal configuration of the motor allows the motor to have a housing characterized by a cross-sectional shape in the form of a chord-truncated circle, such that the housing has a flat bottom portion corresponding to the angular section of the stator that is free of windings. The truncated motor housing avoids unattractive “layover” of grass during mowing associated with round motor housings.
The nature and mode of operation of the present invention will now be more fully described in the following detailed description of the invention taken with the accompanying drawing figures, in which:
As best seen in
To avoid layover, the inventors were challenged to locate flat portion 14 as close as possible to rotational axis RA without sacrificing motor torque and overall performance. In furtherance of the invention, the internal configuration of motor 10 was modified as described below to fit within the reduced spatial envelope of truncated housing 12.
Reference is made now to
In the illustrated embodiment, one-quarter of the pole magnets 22 are not radially opposite any of the plurality of windings 32 at any given rotational position of the rotor. Each winding 32 is arranged on a respective tooth 38 of a laminated stator core 36. By way of non-limiting example, teeth 38 may be angularly spaced about rotational axis RA by regular angular intervals through a total arc of 270°. For example, in the depicted embodiment, exactly eighteen teeth 38 are provided at intervals of 15°. Thus, in this example, rotor 10 may have exactly eighteen windings 32. In the illustrated embodiment, exactly twenty pole magnets 22 are provided on rotor 20, five of the twenty pole magnets 22 are not radially opposite any of the plurality of windings 32 at any given rotational position of rotor 20.
Motor 10 includes an electronic circuit board 40 within housing 12. As shown in
The Hall effect sensors allow reliable high-torque motor starting. Software in the motor controller switches over to a sensorless mode once the motor speed exceeds a predetermined threshold rpm value, for example 400 rpm. The sensorless commutation method automatically compensates for flux shift and back EMF wobble. A phase angle advance algorithm may be added to help compensate for the high inductance. Because of the relatively high pole count, motor speed, and inductance, the sensorless commutation is pushed relatively hard because at high loads the current flyback period lasts nearly as long as the “timeout” period (the “timeout” period is the waiting time needed to allow the flyback current to stop flowing, before starting to look for the back EMF zero-crossing point). The Hall effect sensor signals provide a type of failsafe. That is, in case the back EMF crossover is missed, the Hall effect sensor signal transition is available to indicate that the motor should be commutated.
While the invention has been described in connection with exemplary embodiments, the detailed description is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth. The invention is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications and equivalents of the described embodiment as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a national stage application of international patent application PCT/US14/28285, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/790,388, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/028285 | 3/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/144042 | 9/18/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3774059 | Cox | Nov 1973 | A |
3875437 | Hara | Apr 1975 | A |
4031419 | Spiesberger | Jun 1977 | A |
4315171 | Schaeffer | Feb 1982 | A |
4385247 | Satomi | May 1983 | A |
4642494 | Lundin | Feb 1987 | A |
5412267 | Okada | May 1995 | A |
6700250 | Miyasaka | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713924 | Fukushima | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7173354 | Kim | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7285889 | Shkondin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7679239 | Park, II | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8575800 | Fox | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8643319 | Celik | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9398743 | Fox | Jul 2016 | B1 |
20030175018 | Heydt et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040091127 | Yasuda | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104631 | Noguchi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050174000 | Shimomura | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060001393 | Rozman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20110120073 | Flanary | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150380990 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61790388 | Mar 2013 | US |