The present invention relates to a processing for fabricating (U,Pu) mixed oxide nuclear fuel (MOX) from weapon grade plutonium (W—Pu hereinafter) alloyed with gallium.
This process may be used in implementing non-proliferation programs by disposing of excess weapon plutonium stockpiles. Several methods of disposing of those stockpiles are considered as plutonium immobilization in conditions that prevent its future retrieval and fabrication and irradiation of MOX fuel produced from this plutonium.
Some processes for manufacturing MOX fuel have been developed during the last decades, some calling for the complete milling of UO2 and PuO2 powder feeds in order to provide an intimate mixture, others being characterized by the milling of only a part of these powders.
The MIMAS (Micronization and MASter blend) process that has been created and developed by the applicant of the present invention carries out the micronization by milling only a part of the final blend and makes use of two blending steps to reach the required plutonium content in the final product and to allow the isotopic homogenization of the plutonium oxide.
The features of this process are described in the international patent application PCT/BE99/00012 (WO 00/45394).
W—Pu generally contains specific alloying elements that are not desirable in said fabricated nuclear fuel and are therefore considered as impurities by the MOX fuel users. This plutonium is mostly alloyed with gallium in order to stabilize the δ phase of the plutonium metal but may also contain other impurities. Because the gallium is considered as an impurity that may cause clad corrosion of the fabricated MOX fuel, the designers require that the gallium content be reduced down to about a ten w-ppb (weight part per billion) level.
Wet as well as dry processes may be considered for removal of gallium and/or other impurities.
The following patents address the separation of plutonium and gallium
Some of these patents are dealing with wet processes.
The wet processes for gallium removal have major drawbacks. They generate large amounts of liquid waste, they involve supplementary criticality risks versus a dry MOX fuel fabrication, they need the installation of specific process systems, they require supplementary packaging equipment and transport operations when said specific process systems are installed neither in the facility for converting the plutonium into oxide nor in the MOX fuel fabrication plant.
Dry processes for gallium removal have been addressed during the last years by several organizations. They experimented a dry process consisting of a heat treatment of the W—Pu oxide. A heat treatment called Thermal Induced Gallium Removal (TIGR) and developed by LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex. USA) processes plutonium oxide powder at about 1,200° C. having a particle size large enough to avoid entrainment by the gas stream in the heat treatment furnace. The same organization has fabricated MOX fuel from W—Pu oxide with and without preliminary gallium removal treatment. Another dry process for gallium removal developed by ANRCP (Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium, Amarillo, Tex. USA) operates at high temperature and leads to trap the removed gallium by getters. These processes, performed either with or without preliminary gallium removal treatment have lead to reported gallium removal performances that do not however allow to meet said required values.
The gallium exists within the plutonium oxide feed as solid gallium trioxide (Ga2O3) obtained while oxidizing the plutonium metal to form the plutonium oxide (PuO2). The reduction of Ga2O3 by a reducing gas (f.i. H2) into the volatile suboxide of gallium (Ga2O) and the removal of Ga2O are based on various mechanisms combining gas diffusion into solids, oxido-reduction, gas migration and convective mass transfer. The chemical equation for gallium trioxide reduction is:
Ga2O3+2H2→Ga2O+2H2O
According to the present invention, the fabrication process that avoid the above mentioned drawbacks comprises:
The gallium removal process steps comprise only process steps that are currently used in the MOX fuel fabrication industry and, particularly, in the resulting scrap recycling. Because a same process step sequence may be used for both gallium removal and scrap recycling, the latter can be implemented in one single process step sequence and performed in the same process equipment. As a result, neither specific nor supplementary gallium removal process steps nor related equipment are necessary, what constitutes a major advantage versus existing gallium removal processes.
The blend of W—Pu oxide with uranium oxide powder and/or MOX scrap leads to such dilution that batches containing significant amounts of W—Pu may be used without unacceptable criticality risks.
The micronization step during process leads to particle size reduction and hence limits the time required for gallium migration inside the particle. The compaction operation at reduced pressure agglomerates the particles in tablets that are large enough to avoid entrainment by the gas stream in the heat treatment furnace while being porous enough to allow the reducing gas diffusion inside the tablets and the removal of the gallium suboxide by this gas flow.
Other details and particular features of the invention emerge from the attached claims and from the description below.
In the figures, same references indicate same or similar elements.
More details about the various steps of
The process of the invention for MOX fuel fabrication from W—Pu feed comprises basically a process for fabricating (U,Pu)O2 mixed oxide fuel pellets i.e.:
The manufacturing process may also include the steps formed by:
Pellets rejected at step 9 of visual sorting may be crushed in step 26 and add to a blending step 11 or 21 to be described.
The process of the invention also includes a preliminary processing of the W—Pu oxide. This processing includes:
The process of the invention further includes a preliminary processing of the MOX fabrication scrap. This processing includes:
More details about the combination of the W—PuO2 processing steps with the MOX scrap processing steps of
The process of the invention also includes a preliminary processing of the W—Pu oxide and of the MOX fabrication scrap. This processing includes:
Powder MOX scrap is coming from various fabrication steps: excess powder left at batches tail, grinding dust, powder recovered from dust filters, etc., while MOX scrap pellets originate from sample pellets, discarded pellets, fabrication excess, etc.
Some non-limiting parameters of the MOX fuel fabrication process using W—Pu oxide are given hereafter.
In order to reduce the equipment investment costs, one may use the main fuel fabrication equipment to preform the pretreatment of blends of W—Pu oxide with MOX scrap: mills, mixers, compaction presses, sintering furnaces. Operation parameters for pretreatment may be identical or different from those used in MOX fuel fabrication.
It must be understood that the present invention is in no way limited to the embodiments described above and that many modifications may be carried out thereon without departing from the scope of the claims presented below.
Other MOX fuel fabrication processes exist and may benefit from the present invention.
The above referenced figures are based on the MIMAS process developed by the applicant of the present invention. Details of other fabrication processes that are mainly characterized by the complete milling of UO2 and PuO2 powders and by the combination of the two blending steps in a single one may easily be deducted from the above figures.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/BE02/00030 | 3/11/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/24/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/077262 | 9/18/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5932930 | Wadekamper et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978431 | Edwards | Nov 1999 | A |
6235223 | Doerr et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251310 | Song et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6764618 | Vandergheynst et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6783706 | Vandergheynst et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20040201003 | Gotta et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 00 45394 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 01 03143 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050167861 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |