The emergence of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides a means via water diffusion to investigate the white matter integrity in the human brain and its impact on neuronal functions. Quantitative mapping of tissue diffusion properties, such as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) derived from DWI and DTI scans, is sensitive to the pathological changes in various diseases, and is therefore clinically valuable. The most successful application of the ADC mapping since the late 1980s and the early 1990s has been brain ischemia. For example, in 1990, Moseley et al. showed that the brain diffusion coefficient drops at a very early stage of the ischemic event, and in 1992, Chien et al. and Warach et al. showed that ADC mapping is clinically valuable in detecting early pathological changes in stroke patients. Since then the ADC mapping has been used in numerous stroke studies and its clinical value has been established. In 1994, Basser reported that the FA maps derived from DTI provide unique information on white matter integrity, and in 1996, Pierpaoli et al. showed that FA mapping is clinically valuable, particularly for improving the neuroradiologic assessment of a variety of white matter disorders. Since then, DTI has been widely used to assess white matter development and pathology. In order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and reduce potential motion-related artifacts, human DWI and DTI data are usually acquired with partial Fourier echo-planar imaging (EPI). However, partial-Fourier EPI based DWI and DTI are susceptible to unique Type 1 and Type 2 artifacts as discussed in Chen et al., Improved image reconstruction for partial fourier gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI), Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2008; 59; 916-924, and other types of artifact such as geometric distortions resulting from eddy current effect and field inhomogeneities. The artifacts may cause quantitative inaccuracies in MRI data acquired with conventional DWI and DTI protocols.
Embodiments of the invention are directed to methods of generating MRI images that include: (a) electronically acquiring MRI patient image data using defined gradient blips added to phase encoding gradients to correct for type 1 artifacts; (b) electronically mathematically combining a series of partial Fourier images reconstructed from the same acquired image data such that respective images each have k-space image data with the same matrix size (for reducing inconsistent scaling errors across partial Fourier images); (c) electronically adjusting the acquired image data using dynamic maps of the static magnetic field inhomogeneities induced by susceptibility effects and eddy currents within an acquisition window; and (d) electronically generating MRI images using image data from the partial Fourier images and the adjusted image data. In particular embodiments, step (b) can be carried out to generate DWI and DTI images that have reduced type 2 artifact (and those images may be generated to be substantially free of the type 2 artifact).
Optionally, the methods can further include electronically calibrating an MRI scanner used to acquire the MRI patient data using at least one calibration scan with defined pulse sequence parameters and a phantom held in a bore of magnet associated with the MRI scanner before the acquiring step to determine the defined gradient blips. The calibrating step can be configured to determine the gradient blips using a k-space energy spectrum analysis. The calibrating step may also include mapping the temporal dependence of the static magnetic field inhomogeneities induced by susceptibility effects and eddy currents within the acquisition window of DWI and DTI scans using the phantom.
The adjusting step can also include electronically applying a TE (echo time) correction to the acquired data by dividing the signal intensity of each pixel by a correction factor to thereby correct for type 3 artifacts. The TE correction may optionally use two different exponential functions that are selectively applied, based on eddy current-induced echo shifts to adjust the signal data.
The generating step may include generating a fractional anisotropy (FA) image of a brain or other body organs of the patient and/or a fiber tractography of a brain or other body organ of the patient.
The acquiring step may be carried out using DTI and/or DWI.
The dynamic mapping and correction protocol of the adjusting step can include acquiring a train of asymmetric spin-echo images at increasing echo times (TEs) spanning an acquisition time period (Tacq) using a moving window, and unwrapping the images along a TE (echo time) dimension. The unwrapping can be performed separately on odd and even echoes to thereby avoid errors due to off-resonance effects.
Optionally, the dynamic mapping and correction can also include multiplying uncorrected DTI images with defined exponential functions, then Fourier transforming the multiplied images to k-space, then extracting data from the transformed images to define a new k-space used to generate a corrected DTI image for the generated image.
Still other embodiments are directed to image processing circuits configured to electronically generate MRI images with reduced artifacts using: (i) blipped image acquisition for an MR Scanner to acquire MRI patient image data; and (ii) a reconstruction and correction protocol that:
(a) generates an image with reduced type 2 artifact through mathematically combining a series of partial Fourier transform (PFT) of images of the acquired MRI patient image data, wherein the PFT of the images is configured to create k-space images with the same matrix size to reduce scaling errors;
(b) applies a TE (echo time) correction factor to the acquired MRI image data to reduce type 3 artifacts, wherein the TE correction factor corrects for signal intensity changes due to variations of an effective echo time associated with type 3 artifacts; and
(c) corrects for spatial and temporal variations of a static magnetic field associated with a magnet of the MR Scanner including those due to susceptibility effects and time-varying eddy currents, wherein the eddy current corrections use pre-acquired measures of temporal variations based on a dynamic mapping of the magnetic field.
The circuit can be at least partially integrated into or in communication with at least one of: (a) the MR Scanner; or (b) a clinician workstation.
The circuit can be configured to generate a fractional anisotropy (FA) image and/or a fiber tractography of a brain or other body organs of the patient based on the reconstruction and correction protocol. The acquired MRI images can be DWI/DTI images.
Yet additional aspects of the invention are directed to MR image processing systems. The systems include an MR Scanner configured with defined gradient blips obtained from a calibration scan using a phantom to be used for signal acquisition of DTI/DWI clinical images.
The MR Scanner may also be configured with data from dynamic field mapping of a static magnetic field of the MR Scanner to provide measures of temporal variations associated with eddy current-induced artifacts using the phantom and defined DTI/DWI image parameters.
The systems can include a workstation in communication with the MR Scanner. The workstation and/or Scanner can be configured with an image processing circuit that applies a reconstruction and correction protocol that:
(a) generates an image with reduced type 2 artifact through mathematically combining a series of partial Fourier transform (PFT) of images of acquired DTI/DWI MRI patient image data, wherein the PFT of the images is configured to create k-space images with the same matrix size to reduce scaling errors;
(b) applies a TE (echo time) correction factor to the acquired MRI image data to reduce type 3 artifacts, wherein the TE correction factor corrects for signal intensity changes due to variations of an effective echo time associated with type 3 artifacts; and
(c) corrects for spatial and temporal variations of a static magnetic field associated with a magnet of the MR Scanner including those due to susceptibility effects and eddy current using pre-acquired measures of temporal variations associated with eddy currents.
The MR Scanner or workstation can be configured to generate a fractional anisotropy (FA) image and/or a fiber tractography of a brain or other body organs of the patient with image data acquired using the defined gradient blips for the acquired DTI/DWI signal acquisition.
Still other aspects of the application are directed to data processing systems that include a non-transient computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied in the medium. The computer-readable program code includes: computer readable program code configured to acquire DTI/DWI MRI signals using pre-defined gradient blips to adjust acquisition windows. The gradient blips can vary in diffusion direction and slice number, and the gradient blips correct for signal loss due to a shift of an echo outside the acquired k-space such that a shifted echo using the gradient blip remains within an acquired k-space.
Yet other aspects of the invention are directed to methods of generating clinical DWI/DTI MRI brain images. The methods include: (a) acquiring MRI image data of a patient's brain using pre-defined gradient blips, one added to each of a first phase-encoding gradient of an EPI (echo planar imaging) readout for adjusting acquisition windows to correct for type 1 artifacts; (b) reconstructing the acquired MRI image data using a series of partial Fourier images adjusted to reduce type 2 artifacts; (c) adjusting the MRI image data using an echo time correction factor that corrects for signal intensity changes due to variations of effective echo time associated with type 3 artifacts; (d) adjusting the MRI image data using data from a dynamic magnetic field mapping of measures of spatial and temporal variations of the magnetic field associated with susceptibility effects and eddy currents; and (e) generating brain images of a patient using the reconstructed and adjusted image data.
Embodiments of the invention are directed to DWI and/or DTI imaging protocols that can improve MRI brain image data. Embodiments of the invention reduce the quantitative inaccuracy in MRI data acquired with previous diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and/or diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) protocols.
Embodiments of the invention can simultaneously reduce artifacts resulting from both system-dependent eddy current effect and subject-dependent susceptibility field gradients in DWI and DTI signal acquisitions. Embodiments of the invention provide DTI and/or DWI data with higher SNR and improved quantitative accuracy.
It is noted that aspects of the invention described with respect to one embodiment, may be incorporated in a different embodiment although not specifically described relative thereto. That is, all embodiments and/or features of any embodiment can be combined in any way and/or combination. Further, any feature or sub-feature claimed with respect to one claim may be included in another future claim without reservation and such shall be deemed supported in the claims as filed. Thus, for example, any feature claimed with respect to a method claim can be alternatively claimed as part of a system, circuit, computer readable program code or workstation. Applicant reserves the right to change any originally filed claim or file any new claim accordingly, including the right to be able to amend any originally filed claim to depend from and/or incorporate any feature of any other claim although not originally claimed in that manner. These and other objects and/or aspects of the present invention are explained in detail in the specification set forth below.
The foregoing and other objects and aspects of the present invention are explained in detail herein.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying figures, in which embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. In the figures, certain layers, components or features may be exaggerated for clarity, and broken lines illustrate optional features or operations unless specified otherwise. In addition, the sequence of operations (or steps) is not limited to the order presented in the figures and/or claims unless specifically indicated otherwise. In the drawings, the thickness of lines, layers, features, components and/or regions may be exaggerated for clarity and broken lines illustrate optional features or operations, unless specified otherwise. Features described with respect to one figure or embodiment can be associated with another embodiment of figure although not specifically described or shown as such.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that although the terms “first” and “second” are used herein to describe various actions, steps or components and should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one action, step or component from another action, step or component. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the specification and relevant art and should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein. Well-known functions or constructions may not be described in detail for brevity and/or clarity.
The term “circuit” refers to an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects, features and/or components (including, for example, a processor and software associated therewith embedded therein and/or executable by, for programmatically directing and/or performing certain described actions or method steps).
The term “programmatically” means that the operation or step can be directed and/or carried out by a digital signal processor and/or computer program code. Similarly, the term “electronically” means that the step or operation can be carried out in an automated manner using electronic components rather than manually or using any mental steps.
The terms “MRI scanner” or MR scanner” are used interchangeably to refer to a Magnetic Resonance Imaging system and includes the high-field magnet and the operating components, e.g., the RF amplifier, gradient amplifiers and processors that typically direct the pulse sequences and select the scan planes. Examples of current commercial scanners include: GE Healthcare: Signa 1.5T/3.0T; Philips Medical Systems: Achieva 1.5T/3.0T; Integra 1.5T; Siemens: MAGNETOM Avanto; MAGNETOM Espree; MAGNETOM Symphony; MAGNETOM Trio; and MAGNETOM Verio. As is well known, the MR scanner can include a main operating/control system that is housed in one or more cabinets that reside in an MR control room while the MRI magnet resides in the MR scan suite. The control room and scan room can be referred to as an MR suite and the two rooms can be separated by an RF shield wall. The term “high-magnetic field” refers to field strengths above about 0.5 T, typically above 1.0T, and more typically between about 1.5T and 10T. Embodiments of the invention may be particularly suitable for 1.5T and 3.0T systems, or higher field systems such as future contemplated systems at 4.0T, 5.0T, 6.0T and the like. The methods and systems can also be applied to animal MRI data acquired from animal MRI scanners. The term “patient” refers to humans and animals.
The term “automatically” means that the operation can be substantially, and typically entirely, carried out without manual input, and is typically programmatically directed and/or carried out. The term “electronically” with respect to connections includes both wireless and wired connections between components.
The term “clinician” means physician, radiologist, physicist, or other medical personnel desiring to review medical data of a patient. The term “workstation” refers to a display and/or computer associated with a clinician.
The term “calibration scan” refers to one or more scans that are carried out using certain pulse sequences and a phantom or phantoms to define certain operational parameters of the Scanner. The calibration scan is typically carried out prior to a diagnostic scan of a patient.
The term “reconstruction” is used broadly to refer to original or post-acquisition and storage and subsequent construction of image slices or images of an image data set.
The term “type 1 artifact” refers to signal loss associated with when an echo is shifted outside the acquired k-space.
The term “type 2 artifact” refers to partial Fourier reconstruction errors if the echo is shifted outside the central k-space band from which the background phase is computed.
The term “type 3 artifact” refers to variations of the effective echo time so that the acquired echo is an asymmetric spin-echo with an additional T2*-weighting rather than a pure spin-echo.
The term “blip” and derivatives thereof refer to a gradient adjustment added to a (typically first) phase-encoding gradient of an EPI (echo planar imaging) readout to adjust an acquisition window such that a shifted echo remains within an acquired k-space. The blip adjustment can be used to correct for type 1 artifacts. The size of the blip can vary with (diffusion) direction and slice number. As eddy currents are subject-independent, this calibration may only be performed once, such as during set-up using a suitable phantom, e.g., a spherical gel phantom, and substantially the same parameters as the subsequent imaging scan, e.g., a DTI scan. This blip calibration protocol can be carried out before each patient, at desired intervals during the day, such as between imaging sessions, daily, once per shift, weekly, monthly or once at initial installation (assuming low equipment drift).
The term “protocol” refers to an automated electronic algorithm (typically a computer program) with mathematical computations, defined rules for data interrogation and analysis that manipulates MRI image data to reduce image artifacts.
The term “multischeme” with respect to partial Fourier reconstructions means 1) performing a series of EPI partial Fourier reconstruction with background phases estimated from different portions of the k-space area, and followed by 2) mathematically combining all the reconstructed partial-Fourier EPI images (on a voxel-by-voxel basis) with each voxel-wise signal extracted from a partial Fourier image with its background-phase-estimating k-space portion matching the corresponding local echo-shifting effect, to generate a final image free from type 2 artifact.
Each article, reference and patent cited or discussed herein is hereby incorporated by reference as if recited in full herein. It is also noted, for clarity, that while certain of the figures are described as “color” or “color-coded”, to comply with filing rules, black and white copies or grey scale versions of these images are used in support of the application.
Embodiments of the present invention may take the form of an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects, all generally referred to herein as a “circuit” or “module.” Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable storage medium having computer-usable program code embodied in the medium. Any suitable computer readable medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, a transmission media such as those supporting the Internet or an intranet, or magnetic storage devices. Some circuits, modules or routines may be written in assembly language or even micro-code to enhance performance and/or memory usage. It will be further appreciated that the functionality of any or all of the program modules may also be implemented using discrete hardware components, one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or a programmed digital signal processor or microcontroller. Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to a particular programming language.
Computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may be written in an object oriented programming language such as Java®, Smalltalk or C++. However, the computer program code for carrying out operations of the present invention may also be written in conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on another computer, local and/or remote or entirely on the other local or remote computer. In the latter scenario, the other local or remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Embodiments of the present invention are described herein, in part, with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing some or all of the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowcharts and block diagrams of certain of the figures herein illustrate exemplary architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flow charts or block diagrams represents a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the blocks may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order or two or more blocks may be combined, or a block divided and performed separately, depending upon the functionality involved.
Generally stated, embodiments of the invention are designed to reduce, if not eliminate, the quantitative inaccuracy in MRI data acquired with the current diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) protocols.
DWI and DTI, with their capability in detecting micro-structural lesions, are now routinely used in many clinical exams, for example in staging the stroke. However, when acquiring the DWI and DTI data, the applied strong diffusion sensitizing gradients result in significant and undesirable eddy current effects, which in turn interfere with the MRI spatial encoding gradients, leading to multiple types of artifacts in the acquired images. As a result, the accuracy and reliability of the current clinical DWI and DTI protocols are less than optimal.
Embodiments of the invention can reduce, and may eliminate, various types of artifacts resulting from both system-dependent eddy current effect and subject-dependent susceptibility field gradients in DWI and DTI acquisitions. The acquired DWI and DTI data can have higher signal to noise ratio and significantly improved quantitative accuracy relative to prior DWI and/or DTI protocols.
Embodiments of the invention are directed to magnetic resonance imaging acquisition and reconstruction methods. The methods can include one or more (typically at least three and, more typically, all) of the following components:
Particular methods and/or features that can be used for components 1-3 are described below under the header entitled “Comprehensive correction of artifacts due to eddy current-induced echo shifts in partial Fourier DTI.”
Particular methods and/or features for components 4 and 5 are described below under the header entitled “Dynamic correction of artifacts due to susceptibility effects and time-varying eddy currents in DTI.”
In contrast to a previously proposed multischeme partial Fourier reconstruction method, embodiments of the invention can use a multischeme partial Fourier reconstruction method to further correct for scaling errors. Referring to
In some embodiments, a proposed improved multischeme partial Fourier reconstruction is configured so that the k-space data generated after partial Fourier reconstruction is either truncated (indicated uppermost and lowermost densely striped regions in
Also, with respect to component 4 and/or 5, in contrast to prior proposed static magnetic field mapping and artifact correction, embodiments of the invention provide a dynamic field mapping and artifact correction which can dynamically measure and correct for temporal as well as spatial variations of the static magnetic field, such as those due to eddy currents.
Embodiments of the invention can effectively and efficiently correct for multiple types of artifacts (including signal loss, partial Fourier reconstruction errors, signal intensity variations, geometric distortions, blurring, misregistration, and errors in the derivation of the diffusion tensor and in subsequent calculations such as fiber tractography), due to spatial and temporal variations of the static magnetic field, including, but not limited to, those caused by susceptibility effects and eddy currents, in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging.
Embodiments of the invention are widely applicable to a range of acquisition methods, including, but not limited to, echo-planar imaging and spiral imaging, although components 1 and 2 are more particularly suitable for partial Fourier echo-planar imaging. Furthermore, the methods are compatible with parallel imaging techniques.
Comprehensive Correction of Artifacts due to Eddy Current-Induced Echo Shifts in Partial Fourier DTI
Partial Fourier (PF) echo-planar imaging (EPI) is typically used in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to reduce the TE (echo time) and increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, eddy currents induced by the diffusion gradients can result in a shift of the echo from the center of k-space.
Echo shifts along the phase-encoding direction Δky in turn lead to: (i) signal loss if the echo is shifted outside the acquired k-space (
All three types of artifact vary with spatial location and diffusion direction, leading to errors in the derivation of the diffusion tensor and consequently in fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and in fiber tractography. To avoid such artifacts, a large number of overscans (i.e., number of ky lines acquired before the ky=0 line) is typically required, thereby greatly limiting the benefits of PF imaging. Embodiments of the invention describe a novel PF-DTI acquisition and post-processing method that can correct for all three types of artifact while maintaining a small number of overscans and hence a high SNR.
Methods
To correct for type 1 artifacts, a gradient blip is added to the first phase-encoding gradient of the EPI readout (
To correct for type 2 artifacts, a multischeme PF reconstruction method (Chen, MRM, 2008; 59:916) is used, in which the background phase is computed in a k-space band centered on the shifted echo (
To correct for type 3 artifacts, a TE correction is performed by dividing the signal intensity of each pixel by either exp(−ΔTE/T2*) or exp(−ΔTE/T2−) depending on the sign of Δky (
Three DTI scans of a healthy volunteer were performed on a 3T GE scanner using 28 overscans (TE=103 ms), 12 overscans (TE=73 ms), and 12 overscans with blips, as well as TR=4s, matrix size=96×96, voxel size=(2.5 mm)3, 20 slices, b=1000 s/mm2, 15 diffusion directions, and Tesp=944 μs. The phantom DTI scan was performed using 28 overscans. The TE correction assumed that T2/T2*=80/47 ms for white matter (Wansapura, JMRI, 1999; 9:531).
Results and Discussion
The phantom Δky maps show that Δky varies significantly with the diffusion direction and slice number (
Representative in vivo results are shown in
With 28 overscans, the echoes are shifted from the ky=0 line (
The Δky maps show that for 28 overscans, regions with Δky>0 (
With 28 overscans, the FA map has a low SNR because of the long TE (
These results demonstrate that the proposed PF-DTI acquisition and post-processing methods can effectively correct for all three types of artifact caused by eddy current-induced echo shifts while maintaining a high SNR.
Dynamic Correction of Artifacts due to Susceptibility Effects and Time-Varying Eddy Currents in DTI
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a powerful technique for assessing white matter connectivity and integrity noninvasively. However, it is vulnerable to spatial and temporal variations of the static magnetic field (B0) caused by susceptibility effects near air/tissue interfaces, B0SUSC(x), and eddy currents induced by the diffusion gradients, B0EDDY(x, t, d). The dependence on space (x), time (t), and diffusion direction (d) causes distortions, blurring, and misregistration among diffusion-weighted images, which in turn lead to errors in the derivation of the diffusion tensor and consequently in fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and in fiber tractography.
Existing correction methods such as B0 mapping (Chen, NeuroImage, 2006; 30:121 and Truong, NeuroImage, 2008; 40:53), reversed gradient polarity (Bodammer, MRM, 2004; 51:188; Shen, MRM, 2004; 52:1184 and Andersson, NeuroImage, 2003; 20:870), and post-processing (Rohde, MRM, 2004; 51:103 and Ardekani, MRM, 2005; 54:1163) assume that B0EDDY remains constant within the readout window TACQ, whereas the widely used twice refocused spin-echo (TRSE) method (Reese, MRM, 2003; 49:177) assumes that it decays monoexponentially, which is known not to be the case. Embodiments of the application propose a novel method that can dynamically correct for both B0SUSC- and time-varying B0EDDY-induced artifacts.
Methods
Dynamic BOEDDY mapping is performed by acquiring a train of asymmetric spin-echo images at increasing TEs (t1, . . . , tN) spanning TACQ (
Since B0EDDY is subject-independent but diffusion direction-dependent, B0EDDY mapping only needs to be performed once on a (spherical gel) phantom, but with the same scan parameters, e.g., diffusion-weighting scheme as the DTI scan. Conversely, since B0SUSC is subject-dependent but diffusion-independent, B0SUSC mapping is performed in vivo, but without diffusion-weighting. The B0EDDY mapping can be carried out at set-up or installation of the Scanner, and/or quarterly, monthly, daily or at other desired intervals such as based on equipment service or repair. The B0EDDY can be provided as a stored system resource used by subsequent clinical scans for patients.
Dynamic correction of B0SUSC- and B0EDDY-induced artifacts can then performed as follows. For each tn=t1, . . . , tN corresponding to the acquisition a ky line in k-space, the uncorrected DTI image is multiplied by:
exp[−iΦ(x,tn,d)], where Φ(x,tn,d)=γ∫0t
Each of these N images is Fourier transformed to k-space, and the nth ky line (acquired at time tn) is extracted from the nth k-space to form a new k-space, which is then inverse Fourier transformed to yield the corrected image.
Healthy volunteers were studied on a 3T GE scanner using TR=5s, TE=73 ms, matrix size=96×96, voxel size=(2.5 mm)3, ⅝ partial Fourier, b=1000 s/mm2, 15 diffusion directions, and TACQ=57 ms. For comparison with the proposed dynamic correction, a static correction was also performed using the B0SUSC map as well as static B0EDDY(x, d) maps computed by fitting all echoes instead of using a moving window.
Results and Discussion
Representative B0EDDY time courses show that B0EDDY varies significantly within TACQ for all diffusion directions (
Although B0SUSC- and B0EDDY-induced artifacts may appear fairly localized, a subtraction between the uncorrected and corrected FA maps reveals that they are actually significant throughout the whole brain (
These results demonstrate that it can be important to take into account the exact time dependence of B0EDDY within TACQ and that the proposed dynamic correction method can effectively correct for both B0SUSC- and B0EDDY-induced artifacts, without requiring any additional scan time as compared to existing static Bo mapping methods (Chen, NeuroImage, 2006; 30:121 and Truong, NeuroImage, 2008; 40:53) and while providing a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the TRSE method.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the operating systems 452 may be any operating system suitable for use with a data processing system, such as OS/2, AIX, DOS, OS/390 or System390 from International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., Windows CE, Windows NT, Windows95, Windows98, Windows2000, WindowsXP or other Windows versions from Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash., Unix or Linux or FreeBSD, Palm OS from Palm, Inc., Mac OS from Apple Computer, LabView, or proprietary operating systems. The I/O device drivers 458 typically include software routines accessed through the operating system 452 by the application programs 454 to communicate with devices such as I/O data port(s), data storage 455 and certain memory 414 components. The application programs 454 are illustrative of the programs that implement the various features of the data (image) processing system and can include at least one application, which supports operations according to embodiments of the present invention. Finally, the data 455 represents the static and dynamic data used by the application programs 454, the operating system 452, the I/O device drivers 458, and other software programs that may reside in the memory 414.
While the present invention is illustrated, for example, with reference to the Module 450 being an application program in
The I/O data port can be used to transfer information between the data processing system, the workstation, the MRI scanner, the interface/gateway and another computer system or a network (e.g., the Internet) or to other devices or circuits controlled by the processor. These components may be conventional components such as those used in many conventional data processing systems, which may be configured in accordance with the present invention to operate as described herein.
The acquired image data can be electronically adjusted by processing data using dynamic maps of the static magnetic field inhomogeneities induced by susceptibility effects and eddy currents within the acquisition window (block 120). MRI images can be electronically generated using image data from the reconstructing step and the adjusted image data (block 125).
In some embodiments, the method can optionally include electronically calibrating an MRI scanner used to acquire the MRI patient data using at least one calibration scan with defined pulse sequence parameters and a phantom held in a bore of magnet associated with the MRI scanner before the acquiring step to determine the defined gradient blips (block 107).
It is contemplated that the acquisition and reconstruction protocols can be widely used but may be particularly suitable for single and multi shot EPI, parallel imaging EPI, segmented EPI, oblique EPI, spiral imaging, DWI and DTI (block 105). The generated images can be brain images including FA and FA difference map images and other images of the brain, or any DWI/DTI data derived maps from other body tissue or organs (block 114).
In some embodiments, the images can also be generated after adjusting the MRI image data using an echo time correction factor that corrects for signal intensity changes due to variations of effective echo time associated with type 3 artifacts (block 124).
The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Therefore, it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments, as well as other embodiments, are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.
This application is a 35 USC 371 national phase application of PCT/US2011/066019, filed Dec. 20, 2011, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/425,921, filed Dec. 22, 2010, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The invention(s) was supported in part by funding provided under the National Institutes of Health under NIH Grant Nos. 1R01EB009483-01A2 and 5R21NS065344-02. The United States Government has certain rights to the invention(s).
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/066019 | 12/20/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/7/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/088031 | 6/28/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6188219 | Reeder et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6975113 | Gurr | Dec 2005 | B1 |
8405395 | Setsompop | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8664954 | Hetzer | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9329252 | Bammer | May 2016 | B2 |
9414766 | Jesmanowicz | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9778338 | Setsompop | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20050270027 | Truong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100188085 | Huo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110254548 | Setsompop | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120013336 | Hetzer | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120319686 | Jesmanowicz | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130181710 | Setsompop | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130229177 | Bammer | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130249555 | Chen | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/066019, dated Jul. 20, 2012. |
Andersson et al. “How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging”, NeuroImage, vol. 20, Issue 2, Oct. 2003, 870-888. |
Ardekani et al. “Geometric Distortion Correction of High-Resolution 3 T Diffusion Tensor Brain Images”, Magn Reson Med, 54:1163-1171, 2005. |
Basser et al. “MR Diffusion Tensor Spectroscopy and Imaging”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 66, Jan. 1994, 259-267. |
Bodammer et al. “Eddy Current Correction in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Pairs of Images Acquired With Opposite Diffusion Gradient Polarity”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 51:188-193, 2004. |
Chen et al. “Application of k-space energy spectrum analysis to susceptibility field mapping and distortion correction in gradient-echo EPI”, NeuroImage, vol. 31, Issue 2, Jun. 2006, 609-622. |
Chen et al. “Correction for direction-dependent distortions in diffusion tensor imaging using matched magnetic field maps”, NeuroImage, vol. 30, Issue 1, Mar. 2006, 121-129. |
Chen et al. “Improved Image Reconstruction for Partial Fourier Gradient-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI)”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 59:916-924, 2008. |
Chien et al. “MR diffusion imaging of cerebral infarction in humans”, American Journal of Neuroradiology, 1992, vol. 13, 1097-1102 (Abstract Only). |
Moseley et al. “Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: Comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 14, Issue 2, 330-346, May 1990. |
Pierpaoli et al. “Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Human Brain”, Radiology, 1996; 201:637-648. |
Reese et al. “Reduction of Eddy-Current-Induced Distortion in Diffusion MRI Using a Twice-Refocused Spin Echo”, Magn Reson Med, 49:177-182, 2003. |
Rohde et al. “Comprehensive Approach for Correction of Motion and Distortion in Diffusion-Weighted MRI”, Magn Reson Med, 51:103-114, 2004. |
Shen et al. “Correction of High-Order Eddy Current Induced Geometric Distortion in Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar Images”, Magn Reson Med, 52:1184-1189, 2004. |
Truong et al. “Integrated SENSE DTI with correction of susceptibility- and eddy current-induced geometric distortions”, NeuroImage, vol. 40, Issue 1, Mar. 2008, 53-58. |
Wansapura et al. “NMR Relaxation Times in the Human Brain at 3.0 Tesla”, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1999;9:531-538. |
Warach et al. “Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke”, Neurology, Sep. 1992, 42(9):1717-1723 (Abstract Only). |
Yablonskiy et al. “An MRI Method for Measuring T2 in the Presence of Static and RF Magnetic Field Inhomogeneities”, MRM, 37:872-876, 1997. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130249555 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61425921 | Dec 2010 | US |