The present invention relates to implantable medical devices, and specifically, to magnetic elements in such devices that allow for magnetic resonance imaging.
Some hearing implants such as Middle Ear Implants (MEI's) and Cochlear Implants (CI's) employ attachment magnets in the implantable part and an external part to hold the external part magnetically in place over the implant. For example, as shown in
One problem arises when the patient undergoes Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination. Interactions occur between the implant magnet and the applied external magnetic field for the MRI. As shown in
Thus, for existing implant systems with magnet arrangements, it is common to either not permit MRI or at most limit use of MRI to lower field strengths. Other existing solutions include use of a surgically removable magnets, spherical implant magnets (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 7,566,296), and various ring magnet designs (e.g., U.S. Provisional Patent 61/227,632, filed Jul. 22, 2009). Among those solutions that do not require surgery to remove the magnet, the spherical magnet design may be the most convenient and safest option for MRI removal even at very high field strengths. But the spherical magnet arrangement requires a relatively large magnet much larger than the thickness of the other components of the implant, thereby increasing the volume occupied by the implant. This in turn can create its own problems. For example, some systems, such as cochlear implants, are implanted between the skin and underlying bone. The “spherical bump” of the magnet housing therefore requires preparing a recess into the underlying bone. This is an additional step during implantation in such applications which can be very challenging or even impossible in case of very young children.
U.S. Patent Publication 20110264172 described an implant magnet having a magnetic dipole with a magnetic axis that is perpendicular to the central cylindrical axis of symmetry of a disk shaped implant magnet—that is, perpendicular to the conventional magnetic axis of a disk-shaped implant magnet. But among other things, such an arrangement requires a significantly greater size implant magnet to achieve the required amount of magnetic attraction with the external attachment magnet.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a magnetic arrangement for an implantable system for a recipient patient. An implantable coil housing contains a signal coil for transcutaneous communication of an implant communication signal. Freely rotatable within the coil housing is a cylindrical implant magnet for transcutaneous magnetic interaction with a corresponding external attachment magnet. The implant magnet has a central cylinder axis of symmetry, and a magnetization direction along a magnetic axis angled away from the axis of symmetry at a non-zero angle less than 45 degrees.
In further specific embodiments, the magnetic axis may be angled away from the axis of symmetry at an angle of more than 10 degrees and less than 30 degrees, e.g., at an angle of 20 degrees. And there may be a lubrication coating covering at least a portion of the implant magnet and reducing rotational friction between the implant magnet and the coil housing.
In any of the above, the implantable system may be a cochlear implant system, a middle ear implant system, a vestibular implant system, or a laryngeal pacemaker implant system.
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed to a magnetic arrangement for an implantable system for a recipient patient which is compatible with MRI systems. Unlike a conventional implant magnet that has a magnetization direction along its axis of symmetry (resulting in magnetic poles on each of the circular disk surfaces), and in contrast with the design described in U.S. Patent Publication 20110264172 where the implant magnet has a magnetization direction perpendicular to its axis of symmetry, the implant magnet described herein has an angular or slanted magnetization direction along a magnetic axis that angled away from the axis of symmetry at a limited angle.
One significant advantage of an implant magnet with angular magnetization is that when the implant (and magnet) is implanted in a sagittal plane (e.g. a hearing implant), the magnetic field strength of the implant magnet does not weaken if the implanted patient undergoes an MRI procedure, even for high external magnetic field strengths of as great as 3 Tesla. That is because the implant magnet self-aligns with the external magnetic field so that the angle between the magnetization vector (dipole) of the implant magnet and the external magnetic field never exceeds a value of 70° to 80°.
In addition, an implant magnet with angular magnetization is compatible with an external device with conventional axially-magnetized magnet. By contrast, an implant magnet with a magnetization direction that is perpendicular to the geometric axis of the implant magnet (e.g., as in U.S. Patent Publication US20110264172) is not compatible with an external device with an axially-magnetized magnet. A further advantage over a magnet with a magnetization direction perpendicular to its geometric axis is that it does not need significantly greater magnet volume (about 20 to 30% more than a conventional axially magnetized magnet) to achieve the same magnetic attraction between the implant magnet and an external magnet.
However the torque exerted on the implant magnet (and hence to the implant device itself) may be nearly as high as with a conventional axially-magnetized implant magnet; torque is proportional to the sine of the angle between the dipole of the implant magnet and the external magnetic field. In addition, angular magnetization of the implant magnet may allow an external device with a conventional axially-magnetized magnet to attach somewhat eccentrically over the implant device. This may influence the energy supply and data transmission by the communication signal through the intervening skin flap, and the force of magnetic attraction with the external magnet.
Although various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/667,474, filed Jul. 3, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5196710 | Kalfaian | Mar 1993 | A |
6138681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6991594 | Holcomb | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7225028 | Della Santina et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7610096 | McDonald, III | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647120 | Della Santina et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7991477 | McDonald, III | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8260435 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8585569 | Holcomb | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634909 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652071 | Williams | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8670841 | Dabney et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676325 | Lindenthaler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010021805 | Blume et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20070208403 | Della Santina et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090069869 | Stouffer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20110004278 | Aghassian et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120022616 | Garnham et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130345646 | Bertrand et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005750 | Garnham et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012349 | Zimmerling | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140012349 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61667474 | Jul 2012 | US |