1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to pressure absorption devices that are used within a drill string during drilling operations.
2. Description of the Related Art
Traditionally, drilling of wellbores has been accomplished using drill bits that are affixed to the lower end of a drill string. The drill string is rotated in the hole to cause the bit to drill. As an alternative to traditional drill strings, drill bits are sometimes run in on a string of coiled tubing, which is run off of a spool located at the surface of the well. The coiled tubing is not rotated and, therefore, a downhole mud motor is used to rotate the drill bit at the lower end. Coiled tubing is less rigid than a traditional drilling string and, therefore, may be more vulnerable to damage from coiled tubing string drag, shock loads, and vibration effects on milling/cutting structures.
During drilling, the drill string is subjected to severe axial and torsional forces that can severely wear or damage components of the drilling string. Additionally, these forces can prevent the drill bit from maintaining good contact with the bottom of the borehole, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the drilling operation. Axial and torsional shock forces can significantly reduce the rate of penetration for a drilling tool. Torque generated by mud motors is proportional to the differential pressure.
A number of shock absorbing tools have been designed to absorb torsional and/or axial forces associated with drilling. However, most of these tools are primarily designed for use with rotary drilling strings. U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,556 issued to Anderson, for example, describes a torque and shock absorber for a traditional drill string wherein a mandrel is retained within a drive cylinder with a threaded or helical engagement between the two. Similar arrangements are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,754,086; 4,443,206; 2,754,086, and 1,817,067.
A problem with prior art force absorbing arrangements is that the spiral interface used with the tool is often insufficiently robust to stand up to the rigors of a drilling environment. As a result, the tool will become inoperative. In an extremely undesirable situation, the mandrel may become canted or angularly slanted with respect to the upper housing due to the inadequate spiral interface. In this instance, the ability of the bit to drill is effectively destroyed, and the bit itself or other components may become damaged. Additionally, helically-retracting tools react to mud motor torque rather than to differential pressure.
The loads produced when running a mud motor at the bottom of a coiled tubing drilling string versus rotating the entire drilling string without a mud motor are similar, but different in some important ways. In workover motor applications, fluid is pumped through the string (threaded pipe or, more frequently, coiled tubing) to the motor. The coiled tubing drilling string is not rotated and, therefore, torque and speed are produced at the bottom of the well, rather than at the top of the well, and is resisted by the string above.
Particular problems are posed in milling operations where a workover motor is being used. In this particular situation, a milling tool is operated by a workover motor on coiled tubing. The milling environment creates problems such as erratic weight-on-bit (WOB) control due to coiled tubing string drag, vibration effects on milling/cutting structures, and efficiency issues associated with persistent stall outs. Additionally, as the workover motor reaches stall conditions, damage can occur to the mud motor and other bottom-hole assembly components.
The present invention addresses the problems of the prior art.
The invention provides devices and methods for absorbing pressure loads associated with drill strings that use drill motors, or mud motors, to operate the drill bit. In a particularly preferred embodiment, a pressure absorber is described that is particularly useful in milling operations wherein a milling tool is driven by a workover motor. Pressure spikes from the mud motor are absorbed by the pressure absorber, which react to differential pressure rather than mud motor torque. A preloading mechanism in the form of a compressible spring is used to maintain WOB over a given stroke length. The exemplary pressure absorption tool has a lower mandrel portion that is secured to the workover motor or associated component and an upper housing portion that is secured to the lower end of the coiled tubing or other drilling string accessories. The lower mandrel portion and the upper housing portion are operably interengaged by an interface that permits the lower mandrel portion to move axially, but not rotationally, with respect to the upper housing portion. The pressure absorbing tool provides improved operation due to use of guide members, such as guide pins or guide balls that engage axial grooves in the lower mandrel portion.
The preloading mechanism urges the tool to an axially extended position with the lower mandrel portion being extended outwardly from within the upper housing portion. In a currently preferred embodiment, a number of Belleville washers provide the spring force. Enlarged pistons actuated by motor differential pressure retract the tool. Belleville washers bias the tool to the extended position. The Belleville washers and pistons allow for a shorter, lighter-weight tool. Workover motor pressure spikes during stall conditions are absorbed, or at least reduced, as the tool moves to an axially compressed condition.
The lower end of the coiled tubing 16 is typically secured to a motorhead assembly (MHA) (not shown), which is secured to a pressure absorbing tool 24, constructed in accordance with the present invention. The pressure absorbing tool 24 is, in turn, secured to a workover motor, or mud motor, 26 of a type known in the art for creating rotational motion under the impetus of fluid flowed axially through the motor 26. The motor 26 is secured to a milling tool 28. The milling tool 28 may be one of a variety of cutting tools used within a wellbore, including drill bits, underreamers, rotary mills and so forth. The motor 26 rotates the milling tool 28 with respect to the coiled tubing 16 in response to fluid that is pumped through the motor 26 by the pump 22.
The spring chamber 36 contains a plurality of axially compressible Belleville washers 52 that surround an interior tubular guide sleeve 54. The Belleville washers 52 are stacked single or multi layers thick in an end-to-end, opposed relation, so that they are axially compressible. Although Belleville washers 52 are described herein, the tool 24 might, in fact, incorporate other compressive spring force mechanisms, such as gas or fluid springs, coil springs and so forth, as known in the art. A lower mandrel 58 is secured by threading 56 to the guide sleeve 54. The lower mandrel 58 includes an enlarged upper piston head 60 having annular elastomeric fluid seals 62, 63. A reduced diameter shaft 64 extends downwardly from the piston head 60 to a threaded end portion 66 that is affixed to the bottom sub 44. A lower enlarged piston head 67 is located below the piston head 60 and carries an annular elastomeric fluid seal 69. A slider portion 68 of the shaft 64 has multiple longitudinal grooves 70 inscribed thereupon.
A plurality of guide members, such as guide pins, or guide balls (pictured), 74 are securely retained within the upper housing 34 and are disposed to lie within the longitudinal grooves 70. As best shown in
The lower mandrel 58, pin housing 42, bottom sub 44, and guide sleeve 54 collectively form a lower mandrel portion 81. The top sub 30, upper housing 34, and guide members 74 collectively form an upper housing portion 82.
During operation, the tool 24 is normally in the axially extended position shown in
Those of skill in the art will recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/173,745 filed Jun. 30, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11173745 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11256360 | Oct 2005 | US |