Muffler with acoustic absorption insert for limited clearance pneumatic device applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6202785
  • Patent Number
    6,202,785
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 2, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 20, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A muffler for attenuating noise produced by a pneumatic device having limited clearance. The muffler includes a housing, a base and an acoustic absorption insert. The housing defines an upstream end and a downstream end, with the downstream end being closed. Further, the housing tapers from a maximum width of less than approximately 1.5 inches (38 mm) to the downstream end. The base is secured to the housing at the upstream end and includes a tube for directing airflow and sound waves into the housing. Finally, the acoustic absorption insert is disposed within the housing and includes a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves. The muffler can be utilized with a pneumatic valve having limited space available for receiving the muffler, providing noise attenuation with minimal back pressure.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention concerns a muffler for attenuating noise produced by a pneumatic device. More particularly, it relates to a reduced-sized muffler incorporating an acoustic absorption insert for use with a pneumatic device having limited available area for muffler placement.




A wide variety of different devices are pneumatically controlled and/or actuated. Such devices include processing equipment incorporating one or more pneumatic valve banks, pneumatic robotic applications, pneumatic testing equipment, hand-held pneumatic tools, pumps, etc. Basically, flow of a pressurized fluid, normally air, is used to actuate or maneuver a mechanism, such as a linkage arm, resulting in a desired output. Depending upon the particular application, one or more pneumatic valves are typically utilized to direct the forced air to a desired location within the device, as well as to release the air through an exhaust port. Because the air is pressurized and the exhaust port relatively small, the exhausted air is normally traveling at a high velocity. As the high velocity air flows into relatively still air, the airflow becomes turbulent. Eddies associated with the now turbulent airflow generate pressure fluctuations, resulting in exhaust noise.




Depending upon the particular application, the exhaust noise may rise to an unacceptable level, potentially leading to noise-induced hearing loss. As a point of reference, United States standards require hearing protection for individuals exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of 85 decibels (dB) over an 8-hour period. International standards require hearing protection for noise levels in excess of 80 dB over an 8-hour period. Notably, exhaust noise at less than 80 dB, or intermittent noise at levels greater than 80 dB, can be equally irritating and harmful.




Various techniques can be employed to minimize the effect of exhaust noise produced by a pneumatic device. For example, an individual working in close proximity to the device may be provided with hearing protection. Unfortunately, the operator may forget to wear the hearing protection, or may simply choose not to use it due to perceived inconveniences. Additionally, other nearby workers or visitors who do not wear hearing protection will be subjected to the same noise-related concerns. Alternatively, a sound barrier or enclosure may be placed about the device. In many instances, however, this approach is not viable from both a cost standpoint and because an external barrier may unduly impede proper device operation. A third, more practical approach is to connect a muffler or silencer to the exhaust port.




Generally speaking, pneumatic device-related mufflers attenuate noise by presenting a barrier to airflow, absorbing sound waves, or both. For most commercial applications, a typical pneumatic muffler includes a cylindrical housing configured for mounting to the exhaust port. The housing defines one or more internal chambers through which air from the exhaust port is directed. Further, an airflow barrier and/or sound absorption insert is normally disposed within the housing. Finally, the housing normally forms one or more airflow passages or apertures through which air is released (or exhausted) from the muffler. A wide variety of materials are available for use as the insert, ranging from metals and cloth to composite materials. For example, various pneumatic muffler products are available from Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company of St. Paul, Minn. that make use of a replaceable acoustic barrier insert.




Regardless of the exact configuration, two important parameters must be considered when assessing pneumatic muffler performance. First, the muffler must limit exhaust noise to an acceptable level. Additionally, any back pressure caused by the muffler must be accounted for. In simplest terms, a portion of the total system pressure is required to push a given airflow through the muffler. This pressure is referred to as the “back pressure” of the muffler. Depending upon the particular application and level of back pressure, overall performance of the pneumatic device may be greatly diminished.




It is well known that noise attenuation and back pressure minimization are inversely related. That is to say, the noise reduction characteristic of a particular pneumatic muffler may be enhanced by incorporating additional, or a more dense, insert material. However, this additional material or material density will likely increase back pressure, thereby diminishing muffler usefulness. With this relationship in mind, noise attenuation and back pressure can be optimized by designing the muffler housing and associated insert material to be relatively large. For example, most commercially available pneumatic mufflers have a length in the range of 4-8 inches (102-203 mm) and an outer diameter in the range of 1.5-4 inches (38-102 mm). To maximize airflow from the muffler (and therefore minimize back pressure), the pneumatic muffler housing typically includes a series of circumferential slots along the housing side wall. Thus, the housing itself normally serves as only a partial barrier to airflow and sound waves.




Pneumatic mufflers adhering to the above-described dimensional characteristics have proven to be highly effective in attenuating pneumatic exhaust noise with minimal back pressure. Unfortunately, however, certain pneumatic device applications do not provide sufficient clearance for mounting of these relatively large mufflers. For example, certain types of processing equipment (e.g., a mail sorter) include a valve bank incorporating a large number of pneumatic valves (and thus exhaust ports) positioned in close proximity to one another. Often times, the valve exhaust ports have a center-to-center spacing of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm). Obviously, the above-described “standard” muffler sizes prohibit their use with these limited clearance applications, as it is impossible to mount two of the mufflers side-by-side. Further, where the muffler housing is relatively long and extends an appreciable distance from the pneumatic device, the opportunity for an operator to inadvertently contact and possibly break or otherwise damage the muffler becomes increasingly prevalent.




Efforts have been made to overcome the clearance problems associated with closely spaced pneumatic valve exhaust ports. For example, tubing can be connected to each of the exhaust ports and then routed to a single muffler at a location spaced from the exhaust ports. This technique is expensive and time consuming, and likely results in prohibitive back pressure. Alternatively, attempts have been made to produce a reduced-sized cylindrical muffler housing containing a barrier material such as sintered brass or felt. While a series of these so-configured mufflers can be mounted side-by-side to a confined clearance valve bank, the necessarily small volume of selected insert material associated with each of the individual mufflers cannot alter airflow and/or absorb noise to provide sufficient noise reduction. Of particular concern are relatively continuous valve cycling applications. Often times, these devices require a relatively small noise reduction (e.g., in the range of 5 dB for an open exhaust noise level of 90 dB) per exhaust port, but are highly sensitive to back pressure. The commercially available, reduced-sized mufflers may provide for potentially acceptable noise reduction, but may generate an extremely high back pressure, and therefore cannot be used.




Mufflers for use in attenuating noise produced by pneumatic devices continue to be extremely popular. However, where the particular pneumatic device has very limited clearance space for receiving the muffler, “standard” sized mufflers cannot be used. Efforts to design a viable, reduced-sized pneumatic muffler have been unavailing. Therefore, a need exists for a pneumatic muffler having acceptable noise reduction and back pressure characteristics that is sized for use with restricted clearance space applications.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One aspect of the present invention relates to a muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device. The muffler comprises a housing, a base and an acoustic absorption insert. The housing defines an upstream end and a downstream end. The downstream end is closed. Further, at least a portion of the housing tapers in diameter to the downstream end. The base is secured to the housing at the upstream end and includes a tube for directing air from the exhaust port into the housing. Finally, the acoustic absorption insert is disposed within the housing. The insert includes a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.




Prior to use, the muffler is mounted to the pneumatic device such that the tube is in fluid communication with the exhaust port. Pressurized air and sound waves are directed from the exhaust port, via the tube, into the housing. More particularly, the airflow and sound waves interact with the acoustic absorption insert. The acoustic absorption insert absorbs at least a portion of sound waves. In this regard, the tapered configuration of the housing enhances interaction of the sound waves with the insert material, and promotes sound wave phase cancellation, thereby further reducing noise. Notably, the acoustic absorption insert in combination with the tapered shape of the housing generates minimal back pressure.




Another aspect of the present invention relates to a muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device. The muffler includes a housing, a base and an acoustic absorption insert. The housing defines an upstream end and a downstream end, with the downstream end being closed. Further, the housing has a maximum width of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm). In one preferred embodiment, for example, the housing is circular in transverse cross-section, and therefore has a maximum diameter of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm). The base is secured to the housing at the upstream end and includes a tube for directing air from the exhaust port into the housing. Finally, the acoustic absorption insert is disposed within the housing. The insert material includes a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.




Prior to use, the muffler is mounted to the pneumatic device such that the tube is in fluid communication with the exhaust port. The limited maximum diameter of the housing facilitates the muffler being mounted in a confined area. Further, a series of similarly configured mufflers can be mounted side-by-side to a pneumatic valve bank having closely spaced exhaust ports. Air and sound waves entering the muffler are directed into contact with the acoustic absorption insert. The acoustic absorption insert absorbs a portion of the sound waves, thereby limiting noise that would otherwise be generated at the exhaust port with minimal back pressure.




Yet another aspect of the present invention relates to a muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device. The muffler includes a housing, a base and an acoustic absorption insert. The housing defines an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed. Further, the housing tapers from a maximum width of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm) at the upstream end to the downstream end. In one preferred embodiment, for example, the housing is circular in transverse cross-section, and therefore has a maximum diameter of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm). The base is secured to the housing at the upstream end and includes a tube for directing air from the exhaust port into the housing. Finally, the acoustic absorption insert is disposed within the housing. The insert includes a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves. Due to the relatively small diameter of the housing, the muffler can be mounted to a pneumatic device having limited muffler clearance. Following assembly to the pneumatic device, the tube directs air and sound waves from the exhaust port into contact with the acoustic absorption insert within the housing. The acoustic absorption insert, in turn, absorbs at least a portion of the sound waves. In this regard, the tapered shape of the housing facilitates sound wave cancellation and increased interaction of the sound waves with the acoustic absorption insert.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a muffler in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is an enlarged, cross-sectional view of a housing portion of the muffler of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3A

is an enlarged, end view of a base portion of the muffler of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3B

is an enlarged, cross-sectional view of the base of

FIG. 3A

, along the line B—B;





FIG. 4

is an enlarged, cross-sectional view of the muffler of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 5

is a side, elevational view of a pneumatic device incorporating mufflers in accordance with the present invention; and





FIG. 6

is an enlarged, side, cross-sectional view of a portion of the device of

FIG. 5

depicting airflow through a muffler.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




One preferred embodiment of a muffler


20


is shown in FIG.


1


. The muffler


20


includes a housing


22


, a base


24


and an acoustic absorption insert (not shown). In general terms, the base


24


is secured to the housing


22


. Further, the acoustic absorption insert is disposed within the housing


22


. As a point of reference, upon final assembly, air enters the muffler


20


at a tube


26


formed in the base


24


, flowing into the housing


22


. With this general airflow direction in mind (represented by an arrow in FIG.


1


), various components of the muffler


20


will be referenced throughout this specification as being “upstream” or “downstream” of one another. It will be understood that this directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration only, and is in no way limiting. Pointedly, as described below, in one preferred embodiment, following passage through the tube


26


, airflow will, in fact, be deflected or otherwise directed by the housing


22


in a direction generally opposite that of the arrow in FIG.


1


.




The housing


22


is shown in greater detail in FIG.


2


. The housing


22


includes a side wall


30


and an end wall


32


that combine to define an upstream end


34


and a downstream end


36


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the upstream end


34


, as defined by the side wall


30


, is preferably open. Conversely, the downstream end


36


, formed by the end wall


32


, is preferably closed.




The side wall


30


is preferably continuous. That is to say, the side wall


30


does not form ports or other airflow passages (other than the upstream end


34


). Thus, the side wall


30


serves as a substantially complete barrier to airflow and sound waves.




In a preferred embodiment, at least a portion of the side wall


30


is frusto-conical. For example, as shown in

FIG. 2

, the side wall


30


can be defined by a first section


38


that is substantially cylindrical and a second section


40


that is substantially frusto-conical. More particularly, the second section


40


extends in a downstream fashion from the first section


38


, tapering in diameter to the end wall


32


. With respect to the longitudinal cross-sectional view shown in

FIG. 2

, a taper of the side wall


30


at the second section


40


forms an included angle in the range of approximately 20°-70°; more preferably 30°-50°; most preferably 40°. While the housing


22


is described as preferably being cylindrical and/or frusto-conical (and thus circular in transverse cross-section), other shapes are acceptable. For example, the housing


22


may be triangular, square, octagonal, etc. in transverse cross-section.




Finally, the side wall


30


is preferably configured for attachment to the base


24


(FIG.


1


). For example, in one preferred embodiment, the side wall


30


, and in particular the first section


38


, forms a receiving area


42


adjacent the upstream end


34


. The receiving area


42


includes a guide surface


44


, an engagement surface


46


and a radial stop


48


. The guide surface


44


has a diameter slightly less than a corresponding portion of the base


24


, as described in greater detail below, and preferably tapers to facilitate mounting to the base


24


. The engagement surface


46


is sized to frictionally receive a portion of the base


24


. Finally, the radial stop


48


is sized to positively position the base


24


. Alternatively, other engagement techniques may be employed such that the receiving area


42


is configured to be substantially linear. Even further, the receiving area


42


may be eliminated entirely where alternative mounting arrangements, such as an adhesive for example, are utilized.




The end wall


32


is preferably relatively flat (as shown in

FIG. 2

) for ease of manufacture. Alternatively, the end wall


32


may assume other configurations. For example, the end wall


32


may be hemispherical or other domed configuration. Regardless of the exact shape, the end wall


32


is preferably closed such that it does not form any airflow passages or apertures. Thus, the end wall


32


presents a substantially complete barrier to airflow and sound waves.




The various sections of the housing


22


are preferably integrally formed from a relatively rigid material. For example, in one preferred embodiment, the housing


22


is a molded polymer, preferably polyamide (nylon


6


,


6


, 33% by weight glass reinforced). Alternatively, other polymers such as polypropylene may be useful. Essentially, the housing


22


can be any moldable or machinable material such as, for example, a ceramic, steel or aluminum, and combinations or composites thereof.




Taken as a whole, the housing


22


is preferably sized for use with a pneumatic device having a limited muffler footprint or clearance. More particularly, the housing


22


has a maximum width (defined by an outer width of the side wall


30


) that is less than 1.5 inches (38 mm); more preferably less than 1 inch (25 mm). With reference to one preferred embodiment, the housing is circular in transverse cross-section such that the maximum width is a diameter (defined by an outer diameter of the side wall


30


at the first section


38


) less than 1.5 inches (38 mm); more preferably less than 1 inch (25 mm). For example, in one preferred embodiment, the housing


22


has an outer diameter of 0.96 inch (24.4 mm) at the first section


38


downstream of the radial stop


48


. Further, an inner surface of the side wall


30


is preferably relatively uniform at each of the first section


38


and the second section


40


(as shown by the cross-sectional view of FIG.


2


). With this in mind, the side wall


30


at the first section


38


preferably has an inner width (preferably a diameter) in the range of approximately 0.5-1.0 inch (12.7-25 mm); more preferably about 0.65-0.85 inch (16.5-21.6 mm). For example, in one preferred embodiment, the side wall


30


has an inner diameter of 0.78 inch (19.8 mm) at the first section


38


.




An additional feature of the housing


22


is a wall thickness. To facilitate mounting to the base


24


(FIG.


1


), the first section


38


of the side wall


30


preferably has a varying thickness. However, the thickness of the side wall


30


at the second section


40


is relatively uniform, in the range of approximately 0.03-0.09 inch (0.76-2.29 mm); more preferably about 0.05-0.07 inch (1.27-1.78 mm); most preferably 0.06 inch (1.52 mm). The end wall


32


is preferably constructed to an identical thickness range. With a properly selected material for the housing


22


, the above thickness parameters result in the housing


22


being a substantial barrier to airflow and sound waves. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, an essentially complete airflow/sound wave barrier is presented by a housing constructed of polyamide with a wall thickness of 0.06 inch (1.52 mm).




The base


24


is shown in greater detail in

FIGS. 3A and 3B

. The base


24


includes the tube


26


, an inlet wall


60


and an annular flange


62


. The tube


26


is centrally positional relative to the inlet wall


60


, with the inlet wall


60


extending in a generally radial fashion. The annular flange


62


extends from the inlet wall


60


opposite the tube


26


.




The tube


26


is preferably substantially cylindrical and defines a passage


64


extending from an inlet end


66


to an outlet end


68


. Further, the tube


26


is preferably configured for mounting to a pneumatic device exhaust port (not shown). Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the tube


26


forms exterior threads


70


adjacent the inlet end


66


. Alternatively, other mounting techniques and related designs may be incorporated. With the preferred exterior threads


70


, however, the inlet end


66


is sized in accordance with a “standard” exhaust port size. Thus, for example, the inlet end


66


has an outer diameter corresponding with a ⅛ inch National Pipe Taper (NPT) exhaust port. Alternatively, the inlet end


66


may be sized to correspond with a ¼ inch NPT, ⅜ inch NPT, ½ inch NPT, ¾ inch NPT or 1 inch NPT. Even further, where the exhaust port implements a mounting design other than National Pipe Taper (e.g., non-tapered), the inlet end


66


will preferably assume a corresponding configuration.




The relationship of the tube


26


relative to the inlet wall


60


and the housing


22


(

FIG. 2

) upon final assembly is described in greater detail below. In one preferred embodiment, however, the tube has a length (defined as a distance from the inlet end


66


to the outlet end


68


) in the range of approximately 0.6-1.0 inch (15.2-25.4 mm); more preferably about 0.7-0.9 inch (17.8-22.9 mm). For example, in one preferred embodiment, the tube


26


has a length of about 0.81 inch (20.6 mm).




The tube


26


, and in particular the passage


64


, is configured to direct airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port (not shown) to a point downstream of the inlet wall


60


. Thus, the tube


26


can be defined with respect to the inlet wall


60


as having an upstream portion


72


and a downstream portion


74


. The upstream portion


72


is located upstream of the inlet wall


60


; whereas the downstream portion


74


is downstream of the inlet wall


60


. As shown in

FIG. 3B

, the passage


64


at the downstream portion


74


is preferably cylindrical. Alternatively, other configurations may also be useful to effectuate a desired airflow distribution. For example, the passage


64


at the downstream portion


74


may be frusto-conical, increasing or tapering in diameter.




The inlet wall


60


extends in a generally radial fashion from the tube


26


and defines an exterior face


76


and an interior face


78


. As best shown in

FIG. 3A

, the inlet wall


60


forms a plurality of slots or airflow passages


80


, each extending from the interior face


78


to the exterior face


76


. In one preferred embodiment, each of the plurality of slots


80


are arcuate in shape, having a radial width in the range of approximately 0.02-0.06 inch (0.5-1.5 mm), most preferably about 0.04 inch (1 mm), and an arc length in the range of approximately 40°-60°, most preferably about 50°. Preferably, a first series


82


of the plurality of slots


80


are arranged at a first diameter of the inlet wall


60


, and a second series


84


at a second diameter. Alternatively, any other number, size, shape and location may be employed for the plurality of slots


80


. It will be understood, however, that at least one slot (or airflow passage) is preferably provided and that the final configuration promotes maximum airflow through the inlet wall


60


while maintaining sufficient structural integrity of the base


24


.




The annular flange


62


extends in a downstream fashion from the interior face


78


of the inlet wall


60


and is configured for mounting to the housing


22


(

FIG. 2

) as previously described. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, an inner surface


86


of the annular flange


62


forms a shoulder


88


positioned to receive the upstream end


34


(

FIG. 2

) of the housing


22


. Further, the inner surface


86


has a diameter approximating a diameter of the engagement surface


46


(

FIG. 2

) of the housing


22


to facilitate a frictional fit. Finally, an outer surface


90


of the annular flange


62


is preferably knurled as best shown in

FIG. 3A

to improve handling of the base


24


by a user. Alternatively, the outer surface


90


may be flat.




The various sections of the base


24


are preferably integrally formed from a relatively rigid material. For example, in one preferred embodiment, the base


24


is formed from a material identical to that of the housing


22


and thus is a molded polymer, such as polyamide (nylon


6


,


6


, 33% by weight glass reinforced). Alternatively, other polymers such as polypropylene may be useful. Essentially, the base


24


can be any moldable or machinable material such as, for example, a ceramic, steel or aluminum, and combinations or compositions thereof.




As set forth below, a downstream extension of the tube


26


relative to the inlet wall


60


is directly related to a desired position of the outlet end


68


within the housing


22


(

FIG. 2

) upon final assembly. However, certain dimensional characteristics of the tube


26


relative to the inlet wall


60


can be described with reference to FIG.


3


B. More particularly, the downstream portion


74


of the tube


26


(e.g., extension of the tube


26


from the inner surface


86


to the outlet end


68


) is preferably in the range of approximately 0.3-0.7 inch (7.6-17.8 mm); more preferably in the range of approximately 0.35-0.55 inch (8.9-14 mm). For example, in one preferred embodiment, the downstream portion


74


has a length of about 0.46 inch (11.7 mm).




The muffler


20


, and in particular the acoustic absorption insert


100


, is shown in greater detail in FIG.


4


. The acoustic absorption insert


100


is disposed within the housing


22


, and is positioned about the tube


26


. The acoustic absorption insert


100


preferably conforms generally with the tapered shape of the housing


22


, extending across the outlet end


68


of the tube


26


. That is to say, the acoustic absorption insert


100


encompasses a portion of an available volume, preferably all of the available volume, of the housing


22


downstream of the tube


26


. Thus, as described in greater detail below, airflow and sound waves from the tube


26


are directed from the outlet end


68


directly into the acoustic absorption insert


100


.




The acoustic absorption insert


100


is preferably a non-woven web constructed of fibers and a binding resin, and is commonly referred to as a “blown microfiber”. With this configuration, the acoustic absorption insert


100


serves to absorb sound waves.




The fibers usefull according to the invention can be synthetic and/or natural polymeric fibers. Examples of useful synthetic polymeric fibers include, but are not limited to, those selected from a group consisting of polyester resins, such as polyester, polyethylene (terephthalate) and polybutylene (terephthalate), polyamide resins such as nylon, and polyolefin resins such as polypropylene and polyethylene, and blends thereof. Examples of useful natural polymeric fibers include, but are not limited to, those selected from a group consisting of wool, silk, cotton and cellulose. The fibers should have a diameter in the range of approximately 30 micrometers to about 150 micrometers, and preferably, in the range of about 35-100 micrometers. The fibers can have diameters less than 30 micrometers if they are capable of being twisted or otherwise formed together to form a larger diameter fiber. Although fiber length is not particularly critical, suitable fibers typically range in length from about 30 mm to about 100 mm, and are preferably about 35-50 mm in length for ease in web formation. Blends of fibers of varying lengths and diameters can be used for the non-woven web. Finally, the fibers preferably have a fineness characteristic in the range of approximately 5-50 denier.




Useful fibers also include, but are not limited to, melt bondable fibers that can be of the sheath-core type wherein the core of the fiber is a polymer having a relatively high melting temperature compared to the surrounding sheath polymer, such that in forming the web, the melting of the sheath causes it to flow to and bond to surrounding web fibers. Typically, the difference in melting point between the sheath and the core is about 10° C.-40° C., more typically 20° C.-40° C. difference. Examples of useful melt bondable fibers include, but are not limited to, those selected from the group consisting of polyester/polyester co-polymer blends, polyester/polypropylene fibers, and the like. Sheath core fibers are commercially available from sources such as Hoescht-Celanese, DuPont Company, and Eastman Kodak.




The non-woven web useful according to the present invention is coated or saturated with a binder resin that when cured will impart significant additional resistance to oils and moisture to the web. The binder resins also serve to stiffen the non-woven web so that it resists compression and use. These resins are generally thermoset polymeric compositions, and are selected to be resistant to oils and water. In one preferred embodiment, the binder is latex (styrene butadiene). Alternatively, suitable binder resins include, but are not limited to, those selected from the group consisting of phenolaldehyde resins, butylated urea aldehyde resins, epoxide resins, polyester resins (such as the condensation product of maleic and phthalic anhydrides, and propylene glycol), acrylic resins, styrene-butadiene resins, plasticized vinyl, polyurethanes, and mixtures thereof. The binder resins can further include fillers such as talc, silica, calcium carbonate, and the like to enhance the stiffness of the web. The binder resins can be provided in a water emulsion or latex, or in an organic solvent.




Sufficient binder resin is added to hold the fibers in place without becoming overly stiff. The amount of binder resin useful in the practice of the invention is typically about 100-400 parts by weight of dry resin per 100 parts by weight of non-woven web. Preferably, the binder resin is used in an amount of 130-230 parts by weight per 100 parts of non-woven web for optimal compression and acoustic performance.




The non-woven web can optionally include a saturant coating of a viscoelastic composition to enhance sound attenuation properties. Useful viscoelastic materials include oil and water resistant viscoelastic damping polymers such as polyacrylates, styrene butadiene rubbers, silicone rubbers, urethane rubbers, nitrile rubbers, butyl rubbers, acrylic rubbers, and natural rubbers and acrylic-based viscoelastic material such as 3M Viscoelastic Damping Polymers ISD110, ISD112 and ISD113 (available from Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company of St. Paul, Minn.). The polymers may be dispersed into a suitable solvent and coated onto the non-woven structure. The polymer solution typically has 1%-7% polymer solids by weight and preferably is a 2%-5% solids solution. The polymer should be stable at the use temperature of the pneumatic device which typically ranges from about −40° C. to about 50° C., more typically about 5° C.-40° C. The polymer has a loss factor greater than about 0.2, preferably greater than 0.5, most preferably greater than 0.8 at the use temperature (21° C. for example).




Examples of acceptable web constructions for the acoustic absorption insert


100


are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,418,339, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.




To facilitate placement about the tube


26


, the acoustic composite insert


100


preferably forms a core passage


102


. The core passage


102


is sized to approximate an outer diameter of the tube


26


at the downstream portion


74


. To this end, in one preferred embodiment, the acoustic absorption insert


100


is slightly deformable. With this configuration, the core passage


102


may initially have a diameter slightly less than that of the tube


26


, but will deform to a slightly greater diameter upon insertion over the tube


26


.




With reference to

FIG. 4

, the muffler


20


is assembled substantially as follows. The acoustic absorption insert


100


is formed to correspond generally with the size and shape of the housing


22


. For example, the acoustic absorption insert


100


may be cut from a bulk supply of appropriate web material. The core passage


102


is then formed. In this regard, the acoustic composite insert


100


can be formed as a unitary body, whereby the core passage


102


extends partially through the singular body. Alternatively, the acoustic absorption insert


100


can be formed as two separate parts. The first or upstream part (shown generally at


104


in

FIG. 4

) has a height corresponding with the downstream portion


74


of the tube


26


. Thus, the core passage


102


will pass entirely through the upstream part


104


. Additionally, a second or downstream part


106


is provided. The downstream part


106


essentially is a frusto-conical shaped disc, with no central passage. Thus, the downstream member


106


extends across the outlet end


68


of the tube


26


. With this approach, the downstream part


106


may initially be placed on top of the upstream part


104


, over the tube


26


. Alternatively, the downstream part


106


may be inserted within the housing


22


, abutting the end wall


32


.




With either insertion approach, it is possible to optimize the amount of the acoustic absorption insert


100


within the housing


22


. More particularly, due to the acoustic absorption insert


100


preferably being deformable/compressible, the amount (e.g., mass) of material placed within the housing can be increased or decreased, yet the resulting acoustic absorption insert


100


will still fill an available volume within the housing


22


(exclusive of the volume occupied by the tube


26


). In this regard, the actual amount of material comprising the acoustic absorption insert


100


dictates muffler performance, as described in greater detail elsewhere. In general terms, however, decreasing the amount (or mass) of material comprising the acoustic absorption insert


100


may reduce the sound attenuation capabilities of the muffler


20


. Conversely, adding more material may produce prohibitive back pressure. Notably, the “optimal” amount of material comprising the acoustic absorption insert


100


is a function of the web composition and the available internal volume within the housing. For example, for a housing


22


having an available internal volume (i.e., internal volume of the housing


22


minus the volume of the tube


26


within the housing


22


) of about 0.5-2.0 inch


3


(8×10


3


-33×10


3


mm


3


), the acoustic absorption insert


100


preferably has a mass in the range of 0.25-1.0 gram, where 5-50 denier polyester fibers coated with styrene butadiene are used as the web material.




The housing


22


is then mounted to the base


24


as shown in FIG.


4


. More particularly, the annular flange


62


is directed into contact with the receiving area


42


formed by the housing


22


. The guide surface


44


facilitates placement of the housing


22


within the annular flange


62


. In the one preferred embodiment, the inner surface


86


of the annular flange


62


frictionally engages the engagement surface


46


of the housing


22


. The radial stop


48


contacts the annular flange


62


, whereas the shoulder


88


abuts the upstream end


34


of the housing


22


. Once properly positioned, the housing


22


and the base


24


are preferably sealed. For example, a sonic weld may be employed. Alternatively, other sealing techniques, such as an adhesive, may also be useful.




In the final assembled form, the tube


26


preferably extends centrally within the housing


22


. In a preferred embodiment, the tube


26


, and in particular the downstream portion


74


, is configured such that the outlet end


68


is approximately equidistant between the upstream end


34


and the downstream end


36


of the housing


22


. For example, in one preferred embodiment, the housing


22


has an internal height (defined as a distance from the upstream end


34


to an interior surface of the end wall


32


) of 0.8 inch (20.3 mm), and the outlet end


68


extends within the housing


22


to a height of 0.39 inch (9.9 mm). Notably, the outlet end


68


need not be precisely equidistant between the upstream end


34


and the downstream end


36


. Preferably, however, a relationship of the base


24


relative to the housing


22


is such that upon final assembly, the outlet end


68


of the tube


26


extends to a height in the range of approximately 25%-75% of a height of the housing


22


; more preferably 40%-60% a height of the housing


22


.




Upon final assembly, the housing


22


and the base


24


combine to define an overall length of the muffler


20


(or an overall height with reference to the orientation of FIG.


4


). In this regard, a portion of the base


24


, and in particular a portion of the tube


26


, is preferably configured for placement within an exhaust port (not shown), with the remainder of the muffler


20


extending away from the exhaust port. Thus, the housing


22


and the base


24


combine to define an extension length of the muffler


20


; in other words, a length of the muffler


20


extending outwardly from the exhaust port. With this definition in mind, the muffler


20


has an extension length that is preferably less than approximately 1.5 inches (38 mm); more preferably less than approximately 1 inch (25 mm).




Following assembly, the muffler


20


is used to attenuate noise produced by a pneumatic valve. For example,

FIG. 5

depicts a pneumatic valve bank


110


. The valve bank


110


may be formed as part of an auxiliary device (not shown), such as a manufacturing and/or processing device or pneumatic robotic application. Alternatively, the muffler


20


may be used with a single valve associated with a pump or other pneumatic device. With respect to the application shown in

FIG. 5

, the valve bank


110


is shown as including three pneumatic valves


112


(shown generally in FIG.


5


), each forming an exhaust port


114


. In general terms, operation of the pneumatic valves


112


generates pressurized air exiting through the respective exhaust ports


114


. If left open, the forced air exiting the exhaust port


114


would become highly turbulent, resulting in noise. This noise is attenuated by associating a muffler


20


in accordance with the present invention with each of the exhaust ports


114


, respectively.




Prior to use, each of the mufflers


20


are mounted to a respective one of the exhaust ports


114


. For example, with most pneumatic valve applications, each of the exhaust ports


114


are threaded. With reference to

FIG. 3B

, the tube


26


associated with each of the mufflers


20


includes the exterior thread


70


corresponding with the threads on the exhaust ports


104


. Alternatively, a variety of other mounting techniques may be employed. Importantly, the pneumatic valves


112


associated with the valve bank


110


are depicted as being closely spaced to one another. This arrangement arises quite frequently with commercial applications whereby the pneumatic valves


112


, and thus the exhaust ports


114


, have a center-to-center spacing of less than 1.5 inches (38 mm). Under these confined clearance conditions, it is impossible to use “standard” mufflers due to their oversized housings. The muffler


20


of the present invention, however, can be used with limited clearance pneumatic valves


112


, as the muffler


20


has a maximum width (preferably a maximum diameter) less than about 1.5 inches (38 mm). Further, because, as previously described, the muffler


20


preferably extends from the valve bank


110


to an extension length of less than approximately 1.5 inches (38 mm), the opportunity for inadvertent contact and damage is greatly reduced.




Once secured to the valve bank


110


, the mufflers


20


attenuate noise produced at the exhaust ports


114


, respectively. An individual one of the mufflers


20


and a respective one of the pneumatic valves


112


is shown in greater detail in FIG.


6


. The tube


26


is fluidly connected to the exhaust port


114


at the inlet end


66


. Thus, airflow and associated sound waves enter the muffler


20


via the tube


26


. The tube


26


serves as a sound barrier, thereby directing the airflow and sound waves (represented generally by arrows in FIG.


6


), via the passage


64


, into the housing


22


. The airflow and sound waves exit the tube


26


at the outlet end


68


, flowing into the acoustic absorption insert


100


. As previously described, the acoustic absorption insert


100


is configured to absorb at least a portion of the sound waves. It is likely, however, that not all of the sound waves will be immediately absorbed. Instead, as shown by arrows in

FIG. 6

, the airflow and remaining sound waves flow in a generally downstream fashion through the acoustic absorption insert


100


and into contact with the housing


22


, and in particular the side wall


30


and the end wall


32


. As previously described, the side wall


30


and the end wall


32


are configured to serve as sound barriers. Thus, the remaining sound waves are deflected away from the side wall


30


and/or end wall


32


, again into contact with the acoustic absorption insert


100


. Once again, interaction of the sound waves with the acoustic absorption insert


100


results in a reduction in, or absorption of, sound waves. Further, at least a portion of the deflected sound waves will interact with other sounds waves, resulting in phase cancellations and therefore further sound attenuation. Over time, remaining sound waves will eventually deflect to the base


24


, exiting the muffler


20


via the plurality of slots


80


in the inlet wall


60


. Prior to exiting the muffler


20


, however, a substantial portion of the sound waves will have been absorbed by the acoustic absorption insert


100


or have been eliminated via phase cancellation. Further sound attenuation (albeit minimal) may also be achieved via the acoustic absorption insert


100


presenting an airflow barrier, altering airflow to be less turbulent (i.e., more laminar).




In addition to achieving significant noise attenuation, the muffler


20


in accordance with the present invention generates minimal back pressure. First, the acoustic absorption insert


100


is highly porous, and therefore presents a marginal barrier to airflow. Additionally, the preferred tapered shape of the side wall


30


directs airflow toward the base


24


, and thus the plurality of slots


80


. In other words, the housing


22


is preferably configured to generally guide airflow directly to the plurality of slots


80


and thus out from the muffler


20


.




The muffler


20


of the present invention provides significant noise attenuation. For example, with a pneumatic valve having an open exhaust port noise level in the range of approximately 50-100 dB, the muffler


20


will reduce pneumatic valve exhaust port noise by at least 5 dB; more preferably by at least 10 dB; most preferably by at least 15 dB. Importantly, the muffler


20


provides this noise attenuation while minimizing back pressure. To this end, an appropriate parameter indicative of back pressure is a cylinder recovery time of the pneumatic valve. Cylinder recovery time is a measure of the time required for the cylinder associated with the pneumatic valve to complete a single stroke. It should be understood that even with no back pressure (i.e., an open exhaust port), a cylinder recovery time will exist (e.g., is greater than 0). However, a change (or increase) in cylinder recovery time is a function of change (or increase) in back pressure in the system. Thus, for example, where a muffler is connected to a pneumatic valve device, any back pressure caused by the muffler will increase cylinder recovery time. With this in mind, at airflows in the range of 0-40 cfm (0-1,130 liters/minute) and cylinder recovery times of about 0.33 second, the muffler


20


causes an increase in cylinder recovery time of less than approximately 0.01 second. In other words, the muffler


20


preferably causes a degradation (or increase) in cylinder recovery time of less than about 5%. Thus, the muffler


20


is particularly applicable for use with relatively continuous flow pneumatic valve devices for which cylinder recovery time is a major concern.




The pneumatic muffler of the present invention provides a marked improvement over previous designs. The muffler is capable of being uniquely sized for use with a pneumatic valve having limited muffler clearance space. Unlike generally available pneumatic mufflers having diameters in excess of 3 inches (75 mm) and lengths in excess of 5 inches (127 mm), the muffler of the present invention is specifically designed so that it is capable of having both a maximum width and extension length less than approximately 1.5 inches (38 mm). With this greatly reduced size, the muffler can be used with valve exhaust ports having highly limited center-to-center clearance. Further, the muffler of the present invention preferably minimizes the opportunity for inadvertent operator contact and subsequent damage. Finally, unlike the few other reduced-sized mufflers currently available, the muffler of the present invention provides noise attenuation with virtually no back pressure.




EXAMPLES




The invention has been described with reference to various specific and preferred embodiments and will be further described by reference to the following detailed examples. It is understood, however, that there are many extensions, variations and modifications on the basic themes of the present invention beyond that shown in the examples and detailed description, which are in the spirit and scope of the present invention.




A muffler was prepared in accordance with the present invention and secured to an exhaust port of a pneumatic valve. The muffler was prepared from polyamide (nylon


6


,


6


reinforced with 33% by weight of glass) and had the exterior dimensions of 1.33 inches (3.38 cm) height, and 1.00 inch (2.54 cm) base diameter. The inlet end of the muffler was ¼ inch NPT. The base and the housing were sonically welded together. The acoustical insert material used was 15 denier (nominal) latex coated polyester blown microfiber at different weights.




The pneumatic valve was then operated and various data measured. In particular, a Brüel & Kjaer Type 2144 Real Time Dual Channel frequency analyzer microphone was placed 24 inches (61 cm) and at a 45 degree angle from the muffler. Sound was measured as an impulse in a one second window. Additionally, the cylinder recovery time of the pneumatic valve was measured.




With the above parameters in mind, measurements were taken during operation of the pneumatic valve both with (Samples 1-15) and without (Comparative Sample 1, i.e., open exhaust port) a muffler of the present invention. The data represents an average of 3 readings, except for comparative Sample 1 which was an average of 12 readings. The following results were obtained:



















Wt. Of




Sound




Cylinder







Acoustical Insert




Pressure Level




Recovery Time






Sample




Material (g)




(decibels)




(seconds)











Comp. 1




N/A




96.4




 0.3375






1




0.26




85.9




0.337






2




0.26




85.1




0.337






3




0.27




85.3




0.340






4




0.27




85.3




0.337






5




0.30




85.2




0.337






6




0.48




82.7




0.339






7




0.53




84.3




0.341






8




0.54




82.7




0.339






9




0.58




82.8




0.339






10 




0.59




83.6




0.338






11 




0.70




82.5




0.342






12 




0.73




82.1




0.336






13 




0.73




81.7




0.343






14 




0.75




81.8




0.342






15 




0.76




82.4




0.345














Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, while the muffler has been described as incorporating a tapered housing, other configurations may be useful. For example, the housing may be a cylinder. Alternatively, the housing may have multiple diameter variations.



Claims
  • 1. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves; wherein airflow in the housing is directed toward the base.
  • 2. The muffler of claim 1, wherein the fibers comprise polyester.
  • 3. A pneumatic valve device comprising:a pneumatic valve forming an exhaust port; and a muffler in accordance with claim 1 fluidly connected to the exhaust port.
  • 4. The pneumatic valve device of claim 3, wherein the housing has a maximum exterior width of less than 38 mm.
  • 5. The pneumatic valve device of claim 3, wherein the housing and the base combine to define an extension length upon assembly to an exhaust port, the extension length being less than approximately 38 mm.
  • 6. The pneumatic valve device of claim 3, wherein the housing includes a side wall, at least a portion of the side wall having a thickness in the range of approximately 0.76-2.3 mm.
  • 7. The pneumatic valve device of claim 3, wherein the tube defines an inlet end and an outlet end, and further wherein upon final assembly, the outlet end is positioned within an interior of the housing.
  • 8. The pneumatic valve device of claim 7, wherein the tube is configured such that upon final assembly, the outlet end extends within the housing to a height approximately 40%-60% of a height of the housing.
  • 9. The pneumatic valve device of claim 3, wherein the fibers are polyester.
  • 10. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end and the housing has a maximum exterior width of less than 38 mm; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 11. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves; wherein the housing and the base combine to define an extension length upon assembly to an exhaust port, the extension length being less than approximately 38 mm.
  • 12. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein the housing includes a side wall extending between the upstream end and the downstream end, the side wall forming a continuous barrier to sound waves from an interior of the housing and at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 13. The muffler of claim 4, wherein the side wall defines a first section extending from the upstream end and a second section extending from the first section to the downstream end, and wherein the first section is configured to receive the base.
  • 14. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end and the housing includes a side wall extending between the upstream end and the downstream end, the side wall forming a continuous barrier to sound waves from an interior of the housing and wherein a portion of the side wall has a thickness in the range of approximately 0.76-2.3 mm; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 15. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end and the housing includes a side wall extending between the upstream end and the downstream end, the side wall forming a continuous barrier to sound waves from an interior of the housing and wherein the side wall defines a diameter of the housing, at least a portion of the side wall tapering in diameter from the upstream end to the downstream end, and further wherein the side wall taper forms an included angle in the range of approximately 30°-50°; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 16. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end and the housing includes a side wall extending between the upstream end and the downstream end, the side wall forming a continuous barrier to sound waves from an interior of the housing and wherein the side wall defines a first section extending from the upstream end and a second section extending from the first section to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves; and wherein the first section is substantially cylindrical and the second section is substantially frusto-conical, tapering in diameter to the downstream end and the first section is configured to receive the base.
  • 17. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing and wherein the base further includes an inlet wall extending in a generally radial fashion from the tube and an annular flange extending from the inlet wall opposite the tube; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 18. The muffler of claim 17, wherein the annular flange is sealed to the housing.
  • 19. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing and wherein the base forms at least one passage apart from the tube for allowing airflow outwardly from the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 20. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing and wherein the tube defines an inlet end and an outlet end, and further wherein upon final assembly, the outlet end is positioned within an interior of the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 21. The muffler of claim 20, wherein the tube is configured such that upon final assembly, the outlet end extends within the housing to height approximately 40%-60% of a height of the housing.
  • 22. The muffler of claim 20, wherein the acoustic absorption insert is continuous between the outlet end of the tube and the downstream end of the housing.
  • 23. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves, wherein the fibers have a fineness in the range of approximately 5-50 denier.
  • 24. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including an inlet tube for directing airflow and sound waves from the exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves, wherein the fibers comprise polyester and the acoustic absorption insert has a volume in the range of approximately 8×103-33×103 mm3 and a mass in the range of approximately 0.25-1.0 gram.
  • 25. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein the housing has a maximum exterior width less than approximately 38 mm; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including a tube for directing airflow and sound waves from an exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 26. A pneumatic valve device comprising:a pneumatic valve forming an exhaust port; and a muffler in accordance with claim 25 fluidly connected to the exhaust port.
  • 27. The pneumatic valve device of claim 26, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end.
  • 28. The pneumatic valve device of claim 26, wherein the housing and the base combine to define an extension length upon assembly to an exhaust port, the extension length being less than approximately 38 mm.
  • 29. The pneumatic valve device of claim 26, wherein the housing includes a side wall, at least a portion of the side wall having a thickness in the range of approximately 0.76-2.3 mm.
  • 30. The pneumatic valve device of claim 26, wherein the tube is configured such that upon final assembly, the outlet end extends within the housing to a height approximately 40%-60% of a height of the housing.
  • 31. The pneumatic valve device of claim 26, the acoustic absorption insert has a volume in the range of approximately 8.0×103-33×103 mm3 and a mass in the range of approximately 0.25-1.0 gram.
  • 32. The muffler of claim 25, wherein at least a portion of the housing tapers in width to the downstream end.
  • 33. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the housing and the base combine to define an extension length upon assembly to an exhaust port, the extension length being less than approximately 38 mm.
  • 34. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the housing includes a side wall, at least a portion of the side wall having a thickness in the range of approximately 0.76-2.3 mm.
  • 35. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the housing includes a side wall extending from the upstream end to the downstream end, at least a portion of the side wall tapering in diameter to the downstream end to form an included angle in the range of approximately 30°-50°.
  • 36. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the base further includes an inlet wall extending in a generally radial fashion from the tube, the inlet wall forming at least one passage for allowing airflow outwardly from the housing.
  • 37. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the tube defines an inlet end and an outlet end, and further wherein upon final assembly, the outlet end is positioned within an interior of the housing.
  • 38. The muffler of claim 37, wherein the tube is configured such that upon final assembly, the outlet end extends within the housing to a height approximately 40%-60% of a height of the housing.
  • 39. The muffler of claim 37, wherein the acoustic absorption insert is continuous between the outlet end of the tube and the downstream end of the housing.
  • 40. The muffler of claim 25, wherein the acoustic absorption insert has a volume in the range of approximately 8.0×103-33×103 mm3 and a mass in the range of approximately 0.25-1.0 gram.
  • 41. A muffler for attenuating noise produced at an exhaust port of a pneumatic device, the muffler comprising:a housing defining an upstream end and a downstream end, the downstream end being closed, wherein the housing tapers from a maximum exterior width of less than 38 mm at the upstream end to the downstream end; a base secured to the housing at the upstream end, the base including a tube for directing airflow and sound waves from an exhaust port into the housing; and an acoustic absorption insert disposed within the housing, the insert including a web of fibers configured to absorb sound waves.
  • 42. The muffler of claim 41, wherein the housing and the base combine to define an extension length upon assembly to an exhaust port, the extension length being less than approximately 38 mm.
  • 43. The muffler of claim 41, wherein the housing includes a side wall extending between the upstream end and the downstream end, the side wall forming a continuous barrier to sound waves.
  • 44. The muffler of claim 41, wherein the base further includes an inlet wall extending in a generally radial fashion from the tube, and further wherein the inlet wall forms at least one passage for allowing air flow outwardly from the housing.
  • 45. The muffler of claim 41, wherein the tube includes an inlet end and an outlet end and is configured such that upon final assembly, the outlet end is approximately equidistant between the upstream end and the downstream end of the housing.
  • 46. The muffler of claim 41, wherein the acoustic absorption insert has a volume in the range of approximately 8.0×103-33×103 mm3 and a mass in the range of approximately 0.25-1.0 gram.
US Referenced Citations (30)
Number Name Date Kind
3208551 Carls Sep 1965
3757892 Raudman, Jr. Sep 1973
3811845 Nakamura May 1974
3863733 Raudman, Jr. et al. Feb 1975
3884037 Barber et al. May 1975
3923120 Jatcko Dec 1975
3949828 Frochaux Apr 1976
4032310 Ignoffo Jun 1977
4082160 Schilling et al. Apr 1978
4228868 Raczuk Oct 1980
4324314 Beach et al. Apr 1982
4368799 Wagner Jan 1983
4424883 Musiani Jan 1984
4487290 Flaherty Dec 1984
4580657 Schmeichel et al. Apr 1986
4598790 Uesugi et al. Jul 1986
4749058 Trainor Jun 1988
5166479 Gras et al. Nov 1992
5198625 Borla Mar 1993
5246473 Harris Sep 1993
5350888 Sager, Jr. et al. Sep 1994
5418339 Bowen et al. May 1995
5504281 Whitney et al. Apr 1996
5602368 Kaneso Feb 1997
5658656 Whitney et al. Aug 1997
5661272 Iannetti Aug 1997
5767459 Sell Jun 1998
5777947 Ahuja Jul 1998
5783782 Sterrett et al. Jul 1998
5813180 Whitney et al. Sep 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1432048 Apr 1976 GB
WO 9014146 Nov 1990 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Catalog 105, McMaster-Carr Supply Company, pp. 220-221, Chicago, Illinois, ©1999.
Brochure entitled “Pneumatic Mufflers for many pumps, motors, other air-operated equipment”, by 3M, ©1997.
Brochure entitled “Pneumatic Muffler for many pumps, other air-operated equipment”, by 3M, ©1998.