Acoustic micro electromechanical system (MEMS) transducers, such as ultrasonic transducers, are typically more efficient than traditional transducers. However, due to their small size, MEMS transducers have lower effective output power, lower sensitivity and/or broader (less focused) radiation patterns.
Radiation patterns of acoustic MEMS transducers and other miniature ultrasonic transducers may be manipulated by grouping the transducers into arrays, separated by predetermined distances, in order to provide a desired pattern. By controlling the separation and size of the array elements, as well as the phase among them, the acoustic radiation pattern may be focused or collimated, and also steered. However, the spacing among multiple transducers is limited by the physical size of each transducer. Further, the use of multiple transducers, possibly having different sizes, increases costs and raises potential compatibility and synchronization issues.
In a representative embodiment, a device for transmitting or receiving ultrasonic signals includes a transducer and an acoustic horn coupled to the transducer. The transducer is configured to convert between electrical energy and the ultrasonic signals. The acoustic horn includes multiple apertures through which the ultrasonic signals are transmitted or received in order to manipulate at least one of a radiation pattern, frequency response or magnitude of the ultrasonic signals. The apertures have corresponding different aperture sizes.
In another representative embodiment, a device for transmitting ultrasonic signals includes a micro electromechanical system (MEMS) transducer configured to convert electrical energy into acoustic signals, and an acoustic horn coupled to the transducer for amplifying the ultrasonic signals. The acoustic horn includes multiple horn structures having a common throat opening for receiving the ultrasonic signals from the transducer. The multiple horn structures include a center horn structure and multiple peripheral horn structures. Dimensions of at least two of the horn structures are different.
In another representative embodiment, a device for transmitting ultrasonic signals includes a MEMS transducer configured to convert electrical energy to the ultrasonic signals, and an acoustic horn coupled to the transducer for amplifying the ultrasonic signals. The acoustic horn includes a throat portion adjacent to the MEMS transducer for receiving the ultrasonic signals and mouth portion larger in area than the throat portion. The device also includes an acoustic lens structure attached to the mouth portion of the acoustic horn, the lens structure defining a predetermined pattern of openings, through which the ultrasonic signals are transmitted, for manipulating a radiation pattern of the signals.
The example embodiments are best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawing figures. It is emphasized that the various features are not necessarily drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions may be arbitrarily increased or decreased for clarity of discussion. Wherever applicable and practical, like reference numerals refer to like elements.
In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, representative embodiments disclosing specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present teachings. However, it will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art having had the benefit of the present disclosure that other embodiments according to the present teachings that depart from the specific details disclosed herein remain within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, descriptions of well-known apparatuses and methods may be omitted so as to not obscure the description of the representative embodiments. Such methods and apparatuses are clearly within the scope of the present teachings.
Generally, horns may be used to amplify acoustic waves, as indicated by the incorporation of horns in various musical instruments and early hearing aids, for example. Horns may also be used to manipulate radiation patterns of acoustic emitters, including ultrasonic transducers.
r(x)=mx+r1
A cylinder is a special case of the conical acoustic horn 220 in which m=0, such that the radius r at any location x along the cylindrical acoustic horn 220 is equal to r1 of the end opening.
S(x)=S1emx
It is understood that other implementations may include an acoustic horn having end openings that are not circular, such as rectangular, square, polygonal and elliptical openings, as well as other functional dependencies of the radius of the horn. Of course, the size and/or shape of the acoustic horn may vary to provide unique benefits for any particular situation or to meet application specific design requirements of various implementations, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
Due to its small size, an ultrasonic acoustic transmitter, e.g., with a MEMS transducer, has a broad radiation pattern. In many applications, a focused acoustic beam is desired because the acoustic wave is detected within a confined area. Therefore, manipulating the radiation pattern to direct or focus transmitted energy improves energy efficiency. A conventional technique to achieve this improvement uses arrays of transducers, but this approach increases cost and complexity of the transducers. By using diffraction effects, manipulating aperture shapes and acoustic delays, for example, it is possible to shape an acoustic beam from a single transducer at will, as discussed below.
In various embodiments, the transducer 310 may be any type of miniature acoustic transducer for emitting ultrasonic waves. For purposes of explanation, it is assumed that the acoustic device 300 is a MEMS transmitter and the transducer 310 is operating in a transmit mode. That is, the transducer 310 receives electrical energy from a signaling source (not shown), and emits ultrasonic waves via the multi-aperture acoustic horn 320 corresponding to vibrations induced by the electrical input. It is understood that the configuration depicted in
The multi-aperture acoustic horn 320 may be formed from any material capable of being formed into predetermined shapes to provide the desired radiation pattern characteristics, which may be referred to as beam conditioning or beam forming. For example, the acoustic horn structures 321 and 322 of the multi-aperture acoustic horn 320 may be formed from a lightweight plastic or metal. Also, the acoustic horn structures 321 and 322 are relatively small. For example, the throat aperture 330 may be approximately 0.5 to 1.0 mm in diameter and each of the mouth apertures 331 and 332 may be approximately 2.0 to 5.0 mm in diameter. The length of each acoustic horn structure 321 and 322 may be approximately 5.0 to 10 mm in length, as measured from the center of the common throat aperture 330 to the center of each corresponding mouth apertures 331 or 332. It is understood that, in various embodiments, the mouth aperture 331 may have a different diameter than the mouth aperture 332 for various effects on the radiation pattern.
The multi-aperture acoustic horn 320 is acoustically coupled to the transducer 310, either directly or through a pressure chamber (not shown), as discussed above with respect to
The radiation pattern emitted by the transducer 310 may be manipulated by altering the distance d between the mouth apertures 331 and 332 of the array 300, as well as by altering the size and/or shape of the acoustic horn structures 321 and 322. For example, the distance d may range from one half (½) to approximately one (1) wavelength λ of ultrasonic waves emitted by the transducer 310. Also, as shown in the embodiment depicted in
The acoustic device 400 differs from the acoustic device 300 of
Although
More particularly, as shown in
The resulting radiation pattern of ultrasound signals may be manipulated in shape and directivity, for example, by changing the sizes, shapes and spacing (i.e., distances d and d′) of the mouth apertures 531-534, as well as changing the sizes and/or shapes of the acoustic horn structures 521-524, in order to provide unique benefits for any particular situation or to meet application specific design requirements of various implementations, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, although the acoustic horn structures 521-524 are shown as having generally curved cross-sectional shapes, as shown in
More particularly, as shown in
For example, in the depicted embodiment, the center mouth aperture 632 of the array 600 is smaller in diameter than the adjacent outer or peripheral mouth apertures 631 and 633. The center acoustic horn structure 622 is shorter in length than each of the peripheral acoustic horn structures 621 and 623. Also, the center acoustic horn structure 622 is tubular with substantially parallel sides, while each of the peripheral acoustic horn structures 621 and 623 includes a tubular inner portion having substantially parallel sides and a conical outer portion having diverging linear sides (e.g., as discussed above with respect to
Illustrative applications of ultrasonic transducers include, for example, gas flow and wind measurement, for which multiple transducer paths are needed to determine speed and direction of the gas. Conventionally, this requires use of multiple transducers. However, the same results may be obtained using single transducer 610 and multi-aperture acoustic horn 620, enabling efficient transmission to multiple receivers at different placements with significant directionality, thus reducing the number of transducer needed.
For purposes of illustration, an example of a specific radiation pattern from transducer 610 is set forth below, with reference to
Assuming that an acoustic MEMS transducer is circular and has a diameter of 1.0 mm, the calculated radiation pattern (e.g., at 100 KHz) is shown in
However, using the three-aperture linear array 635 of the multi-aperture horn structure 620, as shown in
Although a similar radiation pattern may be obtained using multiple transducers (as opposed to a single transducer 610) arranged to form a transducer array, the use of the single transducer 610 reduces material costs. Further, the design of transducers with different diameters on the same wafer with the same frequency adds complexity to the manufacturing process. Also, manipulation of the required phase differences among three separate transducers arranged in an array requires external circuitry, which adds further cost to the system and implementation difficulties. Moreover, the manipulation of the geometry of each aperture allows acoustic amplification in the desired apertures.
In particular,
The boundaries of the alternating zones are approximately provided in accordance with the following known formula (or similar Fresnel zone formulas), in which Rn is the radius of the boundary n, λ is the wavelength of the ultrasonic signal, and z1, z2 are distances of the lens 840 to the source (transducer 810) and a focal point (not shown) of the lens 840, respectively:
The radiation pattern is manipulated by the multiple apertures in the acoustic diffraction lens 841 mounted on the acoustic horn 820. The lens 841 may thus manipulate the acoustic wave front to focus or collimate acoustic energy. In alternative embodiments, this can likewise be achieved by shaping materials having different acoustic indexes of refraction.
The various representative embodiments have been primarily discussed from the perspective of a transducer acting in the capacity of an ultrasonic signal transmitter. However, as mentioned above, due to the acoustic reciprocity principle, the various embodiments (e.g.,
The various components, materials, structures and parameters are included by way of illustration and example only and not in any limiting sense. In view of this disclosure, those skilled in the art can implement the present teachings in determining their own applications and needed components, materials, structures and equipment to implement these applications, while remaining within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2381174 | Massa | Aug 1945 | A |
4157741 | Goldwater | Jun 1979 | A |
4524846 | Whitby | Jun 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabush et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4686332 | Greanias | Aug 1987 | A |
4836327 | Andrews et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5025886 | Jung | Jun 1991 | A |
5117462 | Bie | May 1992 | A |
5138118 | Russell | Aug 1992 | A |
5206465 | Jung | Apr 1993 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5526456 | Heinz | Jun 1996 | A |
5543588 | Bissett et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543589 | Buchana et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5670755 | Kwon | Sep 1997 | A |
5844506 | Binstead | Dec 1998 | A |
5861875 | Gerpheide | Jan 1999 | A |
5898788 | Kim | Apr 1999 | A |
5920309 | Bisset et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6002389 | Kasser | Dec 1999 | A |
6028947 | Faraone et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6097991 | Hamel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6377249 | Mumford | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389144 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
6528741 | Walker | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6628796 | Adamson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658127 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6784876 | Nagai | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6879930 | Sinclair | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6981570 | Dalbec | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014099 | Crisan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7158117 | Sato et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177437 | Adams | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7202859 | Speck | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7436393 | Hong | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466837 | Nakamura | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7538760 | Hotelling et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7650006 | Isotalo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20030025679 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040264690 | Coates | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050057534 | Charlier | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050171714 | Ely | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060062420 | Araki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070139359 | Voelckers | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195069 | Kable | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229464 | Hotelling et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257890 | Hotelling et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273673 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080042985 | Katsuhito | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055279 | Osada et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080158178 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080246496 | Hristov | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090135918 | Mak-Fan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090231305 | Hotelling et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090255737 | Chang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267920 | Faubert et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100006350 | Elias | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-03063005 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03063006 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100109481 A1 | May 2010 | US |