1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention is directed to a balancing system for a gimbal assembly, and more particularly, to a center of mass balancing system for an optical gimbal assembly which is guided by active feedback derived from an inertial measurement unit associated with the gimbal.
2. Description of Related Art
Gimbals are often used for mounting optical instrumentation and sensors used in airborne surveillance applications including, for example, airborne law enforcement, pipe and power line inspection, mapping, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions. The optical instrumentation can include sensors for thermal imaging, as well as laser range finders and illuminators.
It is important for the gimbal to be perfectly balanced about its rotation axes in order to prevent drift, which may affect the accuracy of the system. This is particularly important when the gimbal is used for imaging or targeting on an airborne platform, where such an error can have a cumulative effect.
It is extremely difficult to machine gimbal components to obtain perfect balance due to limitations of the machine tools used in the manufacture of the components. Accordingly, gimbal balancing devices are often provided to remedy this inherent defect. In general, these balancing devices attempt to position a mass relative to the gimbal axes, which is adapted to rotate with the gimbal in order to shift the gimbal center of gravity.
Presently available gimbals equipped with these balancing devices have had limited success, since they typically require direct access to the balancing device and to the gimbal. Under these conditions, once a gimbal has been properly balanced and enclosed in a protective housing, direct access to correct any subsequent imbalance in the system can be difficult.
The subject invention is directed to a multi-axis balancing system for calibrating an optical gimbal assembly, such as, for example, an optical gimbal used on an aircraft for imaging and/or targeting.
The multi-axis balancing system includes a gimbal platform defining a pitch axis and a roll axis. The gimbal platform is adapted and configured to be mounted to the gimbal of the optical gimbal assembly. The system further includes an inertial measurement unit operatively associated with or otherwise located on the gimbal to calculate the center of mass of the gimbal.
An adjustable mass is operatively associated with the gimbal platform and is mounted for linear movement relative to the pitch axis and the roll axis of the gimbal platform to locate a balance point for the gimbal in response to feedback from the inertial measurement unit relating to a calculated center of mass of the gimbal.
A multi-axis drive assembly is provided for effectuating the linear movement of the mass relative to the pitch axis and the roll axis of the gimbal platform. The multi-axis drive assembly preferably includes a first linear actuator for moving the mass along the roll axis of the gimbal platform relative to the pitch axis of the gimbal platform, and a second linear actuator for moving the mass along the pitch axis of the gimbal platform relative to the roll axis of the gimbal platform.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the first and second linear actuators convert the rotary motion of a motor to linear motion through a screw driven mechanism. Alternatively, the linear actuators motion could be effectuated by a belt driven mechanism. In any event, a motor controller operatively associated with the gimbal platform for controlling the motors associated with the first and second linear actuators.
The first linear actuator moves a stage supporting the mass, and the second linear actuator moves the entire first linear actuator. The first linear actuator is supported on an elongated bracket and the elongated bracket is connected to a driven member that is operatively associated with the second linear actuator.
The first linear actuator includes a motor, a drive screw connected to the motor and a bearing supporting the drive screw, wherein the motor and bearing of the first linear actuator are mounted to the elongated bracket. The stage that supports the mass is operatively associated with the drive screw of the first linear actuator.
The second linear actuator includes a motor, a drive screw connected to the motor and a bearing supporting the drive screw, wherein the motor and bearing of the second linear actuator are mounted to the gimbal platform. The driven member of the second linear actuator is driven by the drive screw of the second linear actuator.
The subject invention is also directed to a multi-axis balancing system for calibrating an optical gimbal that includes a gimbal platform defining a pitch axis and a roll axis, an inertial measurement unit located on the gimbal adjacent an intersection of the pitch axis and the roll axis for calculating a center of mass of the gimbal, a weight adjustable mass moveable relative to the pitch axis and the roll axis of the gimbal platform to locate a balance point for the gimbal in response to active feedback from the inertial measurement unit relating to the calculated center of mass of the gimbal, and a multi-axis drive assembly for effectuating linear movement of the mass.
These and other features of the multi-axis balancing system of the subject invention and the manner in which it is manufactured and employed will become more readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art from the following enabling description of the preferred embodiments of the subject invention taken in conjunction with the several drawings described below.
So that those skilled in the art to which the multi-axis balancing system of the subject invention appertains will readily understand how to make and use the subject invention without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject invention, there is illustrated in
Referring now to
With continuing reference to
Referring now to
The gimbal platform 40 is mounted to one side of the gimbal 12, as best seen in
The multi-axis balancing system 25 further includes an adjustable mass assembly 44, which includes weights 44a and 44b. In general, the mass assembly 44 is mounted for linear movement relative to the pitch axis X2 and the roll axis Y2 of the gimbal platform 40, to locate a balance point for the gimbal 12 in response to feedback received from the inertial measurement unit 30 relating to a calculated center of mass of the gimbal 12. The process for determining the center of mass of the gimbal 12 is described in detail hereinbelow.
The multi-axis drive assembly 25 further includes a first linear actuation mechanism 48 for moving the adjustable mass assembly 44 in a linear direction along the roll axis Y2 of the gimbal platform 40 relative to the pitch axis X2 of the gimbal platform 40, and a second linear actuation mechanism 50 for moving the adjustable mass assembly 44 in a linear direction along the pitch axis X2 of the gimbal platform 40 relative to the roll axis Y2 of the gimbal platform 40.
The first linear actuation mechanism 48 includes an elongated drive screw 52 connected to a drive motor 54 and a support bearing 56. The drive motor 54 and support bearing 56 are mounted to or otherwise connected to one another by an elongated rectangular bracket 58, as best seen in
The weights 44a and 44b of the adjustable mass assembly 44 are secured or otherwise fastened by screws 45 to a stage 60. The weights 44a and 44b are preferably selected from a set of weights that can be provided with the balancing assembly 25. The stage 60 is threadably connected to or otherwise operatively associated with the drive screw 52.
A slide rod 55 extends between a first end cap 53 adjacent motor 54 and a second end cap 57 adjacent bearing 56. The slide rod 55 extends through stage 60 to maintain the angular orientation of the stage 60 relative to drive screw 52, when drive screw 52 is rotating. Consequently, rotation of the drive screw 52 in a clock-wise or counter-clockwise direction (negative or positive angular rotation) causes corresponding forward and rearward linear movement of the stage 60 along the axis of the drive screw 52, together with the mass assembly 44.
Linear drive screw mechanisms designed to produce linear motion by rotating a drive screw are well known in the art and include acme screw type actuators, ball screw type actuators and roller or planetary screw type actuators. Suitable commercially available linear actuators are manufactured and sold by NSK Corporation of Ann Arbor, Mich.
The second linear actuation mechanism 50 also includes an elongated drive screw 62 connected to drive motor 64 and a support bearing 66. The drive motor 64 and support 66 are mounted directly to the gimbal platform 40 by a plurality of threaded fasteners 70, as best seen in
More particularly,
The multi-axis drive assembly 25 further includes a motor controller 74 that is operatively associated with or otherwise mounted on the gimbal platform 40. The motor controller 74 controls the drive motors 54 and 56 associated with the first and second linear actuators 48 and 50. More particularly, the motor controller 74 is adapted to receive commands from an operator in order to step the motor drive motors in either a positive or negative rotational direction during the balancing gimbal process described below. The motor controller 74 can be configured to receive local commands or remote commands.
Turning now to the method of using the multi-axis balancing assembly 25 of the subject invention, there are processes that are performed to balance the gimbal 12 of assembly 10. The first process is a gross balancing process to determine where the balancing assembly should be positioned on the gimbal 12. The second process is a fine balancing process to determine the center of gravity of the gimbal 12.
The first process utilizes the 3-axis accelerometer of the IMU 30. Initially, the assembly 10 is placed on a flat surface, and the pitch motor 18 and roll motor 22 are set to a zero location, whereby the pitch and roll axes X1 and Y1 of the gimbal 12 are parallel to earth. The pitch and roll motors 18 and 22 are then turned off. Thereupon, the operator observes whether the gimbal 12 moves. If the gimbal 12 does not move, the system is in balance.
If the gimbal 12 moves, the operator obtains vector data from the 3-axis accelerometer of the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) 30, and determines the extent of deviation relative to the z-axis. This value identifies the side of the pitch axis X1 of the gimbal 12 that the center of mass balancing assembly 25 should be mounted on the gimbal 12. For example, in
The second part of the balancing process of the subject invention is the fine balancing process, which is illustrated in
By way of example, the roll motor 18 is commanded by an operator through roll resolver 26 with a step function in a positive direction at step 110. The gyro response to the commanded impulse is measured from the IMU 30 at step 112, yielding an angular rate in radians per second. This is done until the gyro reading is zero. That data is then stored at step 114. The total distance the gimbal 12 moves about the roll axis Y1 is then calculated at step 116 along with the frequency response at step 118, and a positive direction system model is created at step 120 for the roll axis.
This routine is then repeated in the negative direction on that same axis of interest beginning at step 122. That is, the gyro response is measured at step 124 until there is a zero reading, that data is stored at step 126, the distance moved in the negative direction and frequency response are calculated at steps 128 and 139, and a system model for the negative direction is created. The positive direction model created at step 120 is then compared to the negative direction model created at step 132 for the roll axis Y1 at step 134.
If the two models are different, a determination is made at step 136 as to whether the movement about the roll axis was more positive or more negative. If the answer to that inquiry is yes, then the mass 44 of the balancing assembly 25 is moved in a negative direction at step 138 relative along the roll axis Y2 of the balancing assembly 25. If the answer to the inquiry is no, then the mass 44 of the balancing assembly 25 is moved in a positive direction at step 140 along the roll axis Y2 of the balancing assembly 25. The test is then rerun at step 142 to confirm that the gimbal 12 has been balanced with respect to the axis of interest. If the models compared at step 134 are the same, the axis of interest is balanced and the process is deemed complete for that axis at step 144. Thereupon, the fine balancing process 100 may be repeated for the other axis.
It is also contemplated and well within the scope of the subject disclosure to provide a method of determining the mass of the system by calculating the frequency response of the system using the gyroscope data from the IMU 30. The frequency response can help to identify the mass of the system and the spring constant. Using multiple measurements and linear algebra all of the constants and variables can be determined and used by the multi-axis balancing assembly 25 to locate a balance point for the gimbal 12.
While the subject invention has been shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, it is envisioned that the linear actuators of the two drive assemblies could be belt driven mechanisms rather than screw driven mechanisms as shown.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2714311 | Dobson, III et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
3010326 | Koning | Nov 1961 | A |
3576133 | Krupick et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3638502 | Leavitt et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4520973 | Clark et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4971445 | Sato | Nov 1990 | A |
5184521 | Tyler | Feb 1993 | A |
5443247 | Polites et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5794081 | Itoh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
7625090 | Brown et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658555 | Moilanen | Feb 2010 | B1 |
8161832 | Naumov et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8564499 | Bateman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8614742 | Stowe et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020194939 | Cox | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040074720 | Thieltges | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070050139 | Sidman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086295 | McGlennen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20100070132 | Doi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110025831 | Bewersdorf | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120035786 | Yamauchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120182849 | Granger-Brown | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130125667 | Fitz-Coy | May 2013 | A1 |
20140270744 | Webb | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007271392 | Oct 2007 | JP |
WO-2014201447 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2015022433 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Extended Search Report issued by Examiner Maarten Bruinsma, of the European Patent Office, dated Oct. 17, 2016, in corresponding European Patent Application No. 16168469. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160330436 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |