The present application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-165395 filed Jul. 14, 2009, the entire contents of this application being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a multi-band antenna having at least two radiating elements on a base for example, an antenna that is provided in a housing of a mobile radio communication terminal.
Antennas for use in a mobile radio communication terminal such as a cellular phone terminal are disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2009-33742 (Patent Document 1), Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (Translation of PCT Application) No. 2007-524310 (Patent Document 2), Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-67259 (Patent Document 3), and Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H9-153734 (Patent Document 4).
The antenna in Patent Document 1 is a dual-feed multi-band antenna.
The first antenna element (radiating element) 11 operates in a substantially λ/4 mode, and the second antenna element (radiating element) 12 operates in a substantially λ/2 mode. The radiating element of the substantially λ/2 mode has a folded shape and its ground point is located near its feed point.
The antennas in Patent Documents 2 and 3 are dual-feed multi-band antennas in which two radiating elements have a common ground point. The feeding manner for the both antennas is capacitance feeding.
The antenna in Patent Document 4 is a single-feed single-band antenna in which a ground point is located near a feed point. The feeding manner for the antenna is direct feeding.
Patent Document 1 describes that isolation is improved by locating the ground points of the two radiating elements between the feed points of the two radiating elements. However, when the antenna device is installed (mounted) on a circuit board, the total number of terminal electrodes is four (the two feed points and the two ground points), which leads to an increase of cost and a decrease of reliability. Further, Patent Document 1 does not describe antenna efficiency. However, in general, if an electrode pattern of a substantially λ/4 mode is formed so as to have a folded structure and a ground point is located near a feed point, the loop diameter becomes small, and the radiation resistance becomes low, resulting in deterioration of the antenna efficiency.
In Patent Documents 2 and 3, two radiating elements seem to operate in a substantially λ/4 mode due to the structure. Further, there is no description concerning an operation in a substantially λ/2 mode, and the effect caused by a combination with a substantially λ/2 mode is not described.
Further, if, in the structures of the antennas disclosed in Patent Documents 2 and 3, the feeding manner is changed into direct feeding as in Patent Document 4, it will be expected that sufficient isolation cannot be ensured between the two radiating elements.
The invention provides an antenna that has high antenna efficiency and a high isolation between two radiating elements.
In an embodiment consistent with the claimed invention, an antenna comprises a first radiating element and a second radiating element on a base. The first radiating element is open at a first end thereof, is connected to a ground point at a second end thereof, and resonates in a substantially ¼ wavelength mode in a first communication frequency band. A feed line that connects between a first feed point and a predetermined position between the first end and the second end of the first radiating element is provided. The second radiating element has a first end that is a second feed point, has a second end that is connected to the ground point, and resonates in a substantially ½ wavelength mode in a second communication frequency band. A distance from the ground point to the second feed point is longer than a distance from the ground point to the first feed point.
According to a more specific exemplary embodiment, a resonant frequency f1 of the first radiating element and a resonant frequency f2 of the second radiating element may satisfy the following relation:
0.37<f1/f2<0.96.
Other features, elements, characteristics and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments (with reference to the attached drawings).
An antenna 101 according to an exemplary embodiment will be described with reference to
The antenna 101 includes a dielectric base (dielectric block) 20 having a substantially rectangular parallelepiped shape, and a conductor having a predetermined pattern that is formed on an outer surface of the dielectric base 20. A first power supply terminal electrode FP1, a second power supply terminal electrode FP2, and a ground terminal electrode GP are formed on a lower surface (a mounted surface with respect to the circuit board 30) of the dielectric base 20. The first power supply terminal electrode FP1, the second power supply terminal electrode FP2, and the ground terminal electrode GP corresponds to “a first feed point”, “a second feed point”, and “a ground point”, respectively.
On a front surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R11 is formed so as to extend from the ground terminal electrode GP. On an upper surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R12 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R11. On a rear surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R13 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R12. These conductor patterns R11, R12, and R13 constitute a first radiating element.
On the front surface of the dielectric base 20, a feed line F1 is formed so as to extend from the first power supply terminal electrode FP1 to a part of the conductor pattern R11.
On the front surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R21 is formed so as to extend from the second power supply terminal electrode FP2. On the upper surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R22 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R21. On the front surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R23 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R22 to the ground terminal electrode GP. These conductor patterns R21, R22, and R23 constitute a second radiating element. The antenna 101 is mounted on an upper surface of a ground electrode forming region of the circuit board 30.
A voltage supplied from the first power supply circuit FC1 is applied to a predetermined position of the first radiating element via the feed line F1.
The first radiating element constituted of the conductor patterns R11, R12, and R13 is open at a first end thereof and grounded at a second end thereof. Due to this structure, the first radiating element resonates in a substantially ¼ wavelength mode in the first communication frequency band.
Further, a first end of the second radiating element constituted of the conductor patterns R21, R22, and R23 is connected to a matching circuit MC and the second power supply circuit FC2 via the second power supply terminal electrode FP2. A second end of the second radiating element is grounded via the ground terminal electrode GP. Thus, the second radiating element resonates in a substantially ½ wavelength mode in the second communication frequency band. The matching circuit MC matches the impedance between the second power supply circuit FC2 and the second radiating element constituted of the conductor patterns R21, R22, and R23.
According to the structure described above, the ground terminal electrode GP is shared by the first and second radiating elements, and thus the number of terminal electrodes can be reduced. Therefore, the cost can be reduced, and improvement of reliability such as corrosion resistance can be also expected.
Due to the ground plane image occurring with the ground electrode GND of the circuit board 30 as a mirror surface as described above, the second radiating element acts as a single-frequency radiating element with a large loop area. The second radiating element constituted of the conductor patterns R21, R22, and R23 does not have a folded structure. The first and second radiating elements are formed such that the distance from the ground terminal electrode GP to the second power supply terminal electrode FP2 is longer than the distance from the ground terminal electrode GP to the first power supply terminal electrode FP1. Thus, even when the dielectric base 20 with a limited size is used, the second radiating element with a large loop area can be formed. Therefore, the radiation resistance of the second radiating element becomes great and high antenna efficiency is obtained.
In general, in a loop antenna that operates in a substantially λ/2 mode, the radiation resistance Rr increases as the loop area increases as shown in the following formula. Here, where: the shape of a radiating element is a substantially circular loop; the outer diameter of the loop is R; a conductor width is r; and a current flowing through the loop is I, a magnetic moment m is represented by:
m=IπR2.
Where: the characteristic impedance of the space is denoted by Zo (120π [Π]); a wave number is denoted by ko (ko=2π/λ [rad/m]); a wavelength is denoted by λ, the radiation resistance Rr satisfies the following relation.
Rr=(Zoko4/6π)(m/2I)2
=(Zoko4/24)πR4
Therefore, the second radiating element does not have a folded structure, and the radiation resistance of the second radiating element increases as the loop area is increased by the position of the ground point being distant from the feed point. As a result, high antenna efficiency is obtained.
Here, the center frequency f1 of the first communication frequency band is set at 3600 MHz, the center frequency f2 of the second communication frequency band is set at 5500 MHz (f1/f2=0.65), and these distribution views are obtained by an electromagnetic field simulation.
As shown in
Similarly, as shown in
In the case where the center frequency f1 of the first communication frequency band and the center frequency f2 of the second communication frequency band satisfy the following relation:
0.37<f1/f2<0.96,
when the second radiating element resonates, for example, at 5 GHz, the first radiating element becomes an end-open line whose frequency is about from ¼ to ¾ of the frequency f2.
In the end-open radiating element, a connection point opposed to the open end has a high impedance with respect to about ½ wavelength. Thus, with the relation between the center frequency f1 of the first communication frequency band and the center frequency f2 of the second communication frequency band in the above range, the first radiating element becomes less likely to be excited at the frequency f2.
Further, when the first radiating element resonates at 2.5 GHz, the second radiating element becomes a both-ends short-circuited line whose frequency is equal to or lower than about ½ of the frequency f1.
In the ends short-circuited radiating element, a connection point opposed to the short-circuited end has a high impedance with respect to about ¼ wavelength. Thus, with the relation between the center frequency f1 of the first communication frequency band and the center frequency f2 of the second communication frequency band in the above range, the second radiating element becomes less likely to be excited at the frequency f1.
Therefore, with the relation between the center frequency f1 of the first communication frequency band and the center frequency f2 of the second communication frequency band in the above range, the isolation between the first radiating element and the second radiating element can be increased.
The vertical axis for the curves S11 (R1) and S22 (R2) has a scale of 5 dB, and the vertical axis for the curve S21 (R1 to R2) has a scale of 10 dB. The horizontal axis indicates the frequency range of from 2 GHz to 6 GHz. As shown in the result, the isolation between the first radiating element and the second radiating element is ensured to be 15 dB or higher. This value is sufficient as a characteristic of a multi-band antenna.
In general, it is desirable to ensure an isolation of at least 10 dB or higher. From
The antenna 102 includes a dielectric base (dielectric block) 20 having a substantially rectangular parallelepiped shape, and a conductor having a predetermined pattern is formed on an outer surface of the dielectric base 20. The antenna 102 is different from the exemplary embodiment of the antenna shown in
On a front surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R11 is formed so as to extend from a ground terminal electrode GP. On an upper surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R12 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R11. On a rear surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R13 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R12. On the upper surface of the dielectric base 20, a substantially crank-shaped conductor pattern R14 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R13. On the rear surface of the dielectric base 20, a conductor pattern R15 is formed so as to extend from the conductor pattern R14. These conductor patterns R11, R12, R13, R14, and R15 constitute a first radiating element. The other structure is the same as the antenna 101 shown in
As described above, in the exemplary embodiment shown in
Embodiments consistent with the claimed invention have a structure in the ground point shared by the first and second radiating elements. Thus, the number of terminal electrodes can be reduced, leading to a decrease in cost.
By using the second radiating element in a substantially λ/2 mode as an end short-circuited element and locating the ground point so as to be distant from the second feed point, the loop diameter can be increased and the radiation resistance can be increased. Thus, the antenna efficiency can be improved. Further, an isolation characteristic can be improved.
Additionally, the number of terminal electrodes to be conducted to electrodes on a circuit board on which the antenna is mounted is small, and thus the cost can be reduced.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described above, it is to be understood that variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The scope of the invention, therefore, is to be determined solely by the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-165395 | Jul 2009 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6597259 | Peters | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7196667 | Watada et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7463196 | Hilgers | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7701401 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7714795 | Wen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20060208950 | Tago | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290575 | Pelzer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09-153734 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2006-067259 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2007-524310 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-126724 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-033742 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2005083535 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action “Notification of Reason for Rejection” dated Aug. 23, 2011; Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-165395 with translation. |
Kyouhei Fujimoto et al.; Graphic Explanation of Mobile Communication Antenna System; Oct. 10, 1996; pp. 113-114; published by Sougou Denshi Publishing Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan; with English translation. |
The first Office Action issued by State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China dated Oct. 10, 2012, which corresponds to Chinese Patent Application No. 201010228916.4 and is related to U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,476, with translation. |
The Second Office Action issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China on Mar. 4, 2013, which corresponds to Chinese Patent Application No. 201010228916.4 and is related to U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,476 with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110102268 A1 | May 2011 | US |