Multi-beam antenna communication system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6388634
  • Patent Number
    6,388,634
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 31, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 14, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A communication system and method for reconfigurably transmitting and receiving signals via a multi-beam reflector antenna array are disclosed. The multi-beam antenna system comprises a plurality of rings of single beam reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the plurality of rings are substantially concentric or nested and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved. The method, in one embodiment, comprises generating beams from a first, second and third ring of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from the first, second and third ring of single beam feeds on a separate reflector to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to systems and methods for transmitting communication signals, and in particular to systems and methods for transmitting communication signals across high scan angles.




2. Description of the Related Art




Communications satellites are in widespread use and communication systems based upon high-altitude platforms are under development. Such wireless communications systems are used to deliver television and other communications signals to end users.




The primary design constraints for communications satellites and platforms are antenna beam coverage and radiated Radio Frequency (RF) power. These two design constraints are generally paramount in the payload design because they determine which locations on the ground will be able to receive communications service. In addition, the system weight becomes a factor, because launch vehicles and platforms are limited as to how much payload weight can be placed on station.




Further, in high-altitude platform and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite applications it is often necessary to form multiple antenna beams illuminating the ground. Such communication systems require antennas with on-station beam coverage systems capable of altering the beam scan on the ground as well as the beam shape.




Since it is desirable for ground coverage to be evenly distributed among a wide pattern of cells, producing an even pattern on the ground requires a versatile antenna system capable of high scan angles. This presents a difficult problem to antenna system designers.




Three alternative antenna configurations that are generally known in the art are a multi-feed reflector, a single beam phased array and a multibeam phased array. However, each of these configurations has limitations in high-altitude platform and LEO applications.




One configuration known in the art uses a single parabolic reflector with multiple feeds. In order to generate different beam shapes, multiple feeds are combined using a complex beam forming network. Hence a very large number of feeds and multiple Beam Forming Networks (BFNs) are required. In addition, a very large number of parabolic reflectors, requiring an enormous physical envelope, would be needed to apply this configuration in near Earth applications. Due to the wide angular coverage required, each reflector could be used to produce a spot beam over only a very small portion of the overall coverage area.




Another configuration is described by K. K. Chan, et al.,


A Circularly Polarized Waveguide Array for LEO Satellite Communications


, IEEE AP-S International Symposium, June 1999 which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. The proposed system requires a single beam phased array for each beam. While this approach can be used to form different beam shapes, such a system is costly to produce. Furthermore, due to the inherent nature of a phased array, wide-band operation, necessary for simultaneous transmit-receive applications, can be almost impossible to achieve.




A third configuration known in the art uses a multiple-beam phased array. Antenna configurations using multiple-beam phased arrays are inherently more complex and expensive than other configurations. Furthermore, the wide-angle scanning requirement of near Earth applications necessitates the use of very small elements resulting in a large number of elements in the array, thereby increasing the cost and complexity. Alternatively, a plurality of separate phased arrays may be employed, each one operating over a narrow region, however the complexity and expense would be undiminished.




There is therefore a need in the art for a compact, less costly, antenna system capable of simultaneous transmit-receive applications, without the attendant complexity and/or size of prior art systems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To address the requirements described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses an apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving signals with a multi-beam reflector antenna assembly.




The present invention teaches a multi-beam antenna assembly, comprising a plurality of rings of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the plurality of rings are substantially nested or concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above. In one embodiment, each feed is diplexed to provide both transmit and receive functionality. In one embodiment, the rings are substantially circular in a concentric configuration. Alternate configurations may employ rings of other shapes in a nested configuration.




The present invention also teaches a method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising generating a plurality of beams from a plurality of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from a separate reflector of a plurality of single beam reflector rings to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the reflector rings are substantially nested/concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a communication system having at least one above-ground platform having a multi-beam antenna including a plurality of rings, each ring having a plurality of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the rings are substantially nested or concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention produces a uniform coverage pattern of cells defined as hexagons on the ground from a near Earth station, orbital or otherwise.




The present invention provides an antenna configuration used to generate multiple beams, with the capability of optimizing each of the beams independently for mainlobe and sidelobe performance.




Each cell is covered by a separate feed and reflector combination. Each feed and reflector can also be optimized to provide uniform cell illumination for both transmit and receive functions.




The present invention can be used to optimize wide-band performance in a simple and effective manner. Further, the number of rings can be extended to generate more beams and thus a greater number of ground cells.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:





FIGS. 1A-1B

illustrate a ground pattern of identical fixed cells with a cell separation of 8 Kms and the corresponding beam pattern as seen from a platform altitude of 20 kilometers;





FIGS. 2A-2C

illustrate a reflector antenna embodiment producing a coverage pattern from 20 km;





FIG. 2D

is a diagram illustrating the payload deployed on an above-ground platform;





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a single offset reflector geometry with a reflector diameter of 8 inches; and





FIGS. 4A-4C

depict examples of central, middle and outer reflector ring beams with suppressed sidelobes.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which is shown, by way of illustration, several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.





FIG. 1A

illustrates a ground pattern


100


in km of sixty-one identical fixed cells


102


with a cell separation of 8 km. The uniform cells


102


are defined as hexagons on the ground.

FIG. 1B

illustrates the corresponding cells


102


in degrees generated from an altitude of 20 km, the on-station pattern


104


. Due to the inherent geometry, the required antenna scan angle can be very large, requiring an angular sweep greater than ±50° for antennas at or near the nadir. Further, the on-station pattern


104


is distorted when compared to the ground pattern


100


of cells


102


. Such an on-station pattern


104


can be generated by an antenna configuration of the invention.




The exact number of cells


102


used in the ground pattern


100


, as well as the shape of the overall ground pattern


100


can be varied depending upon the specific application. In particular, coverage of one or more of the cells


102


may be omitted if the region is located in an unpopulated or inaccessible area. Likewise, additional cells


102


may be included to cover appended geography. The overall ground pattern


100


may have the shape of any geography within the scan range of the on-station pattern


104


. In addition, individual cells


102


may have different shapes; uniform ground cell shapes are not required.





FIGS. 2A-2C

depicts one embodiment of the a multi-beam satellite system


250


comprising three sets of twenty reflectors


202


arranged in substantially concentric circular reflector rings


200


A-


200


C (hereinafter alternatively collectively referred to as reflector ring(s)


200


) to cover any 60 of the 61 cells in the ground pattern


100


. Each reflector


202


is used to produce coverage of one cell


102


in the overall coverage pattern


100


,


104


. Each reflector


202


has its own feed


204


. As shown in

FIG. 2C

, the first, second and third reflector rings


200


are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors


202


of adjacent rings


200


are substantially interleaved as viewed from above. This configuration allows for a compact arrangement of a large number of reflectors


202


having optimized fields of view.




In the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, the reflector rings


200


are substantially circular. Alternate configurations may employ rings


200


of other shapes which are nested and disposed on separate planes and similarly present reflectors


202


of adjacent rings


200


substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




Also in the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, inner reflector rings


200


A of smaller diametric extent (e.g. diameter, for circular reflector rings) are disposed at higher planes, nearer to ground. Alternate configurations may arrange the rings


200


such that the outer reflector rings


200


are disposed at higher planes or employ a mixture of higher and lower planes of rings


200


as necessary to achieve optimal coverage for a given application.




As previously discussed, one cell


106


in the example coverage pattern


100


,


104


of

FIGS. 1A and 1B

is not covered and therefore does not receive a beam from one of the reflectors


202


. The antenna of

FIGS. 2A-2C

covers sixty of the sixty-one cells of FIG.


1


A. Coverage of any cell


102


may be omitted depending upon the particular geography and application of the antenna. In addition, cells may also overlap to achieve better performance or expanded service.




The correspondence between cells


102


and reflectors


202


is determined in part according to field of view considerations. Although the invention produces a versatile antenna whereby most reflectors


202


have potential fields of view including many, if not all, cells


102


in the coverage pattern


100


,


104


, some reflectors


202


may not have a potential field of view including some cells


102


due to obstruction by the structure. For example, in the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, a reflector


202


of the outermost ring


200


may not have a view of a cell


102


located on the opposite side of the coverage pattern


100


,


104


, depending upon the platform


252


or satellite orientation and the required scan angle. However, an optimal field of view design using the invention for a specified application is easily developed with the reflector rings


200


arranged at different planes. In the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, reflectors


202


of the outer reflector rings


200


generally cover outer cells


102


of the coverage pattern


100


,


104


nearest to the particular reflector


202


.




In addition, the present invention can optionally incorporate an efficient structure as shown in

FIGS. 2A-2C

. The feed horns


204


for the third reflector rings


200


C are affixed to support structure


208


of the second reflector ring


200


B between the reflectors


202


. The feed horns


204


for the first reflector ring


200


A are attached to a feed horn ring structure


206


disposed from the first reflector ring


200


. This particular structure of the feed horns


204


is not essential for operation of the present invention, however.





FIG. 2D

is a diagram showing the implementation of the multibeam antenna system


250


on an above-ground or high altitude platform


252


.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a single offset reflector geometry


300


used in one embodiment of present invention. All the sixty beams of the example embodiment are individually produced by reflectors


302


of a substantially identical diameter of 8 inches. Each reflector


302


is separately fed by a high performance feed horn


304


operating at two or more operating frequencies or frequency bands, 20 and 30 GHz for example. One or more of the feeds may be corrugated horns.




Alternatively, individual reflectors


302


may be individually shaped and/or sized (e.g., of different diametric extent) to optimize the performance at the two frequency bands, taking into account the sidelobe suppression required in some of the cells


102


. The use of shaped reflectors allows for a much more efficient and compact antenna configuration. Also, although uniformity of the reflectors


302


is desirable to facilitate manufacturing, individual reflectors


302


may be customized for custom applications or services.





FIGS. 4A-4C

illustrate radiation patterns


400


,


402


and


404


at 20 GHz for three example cells


102


respectively from the central, middle and outer rings. In order to use the similar reflector geometry for all the beams


102


, each reflector


204


position is appropriately rotated to point at its respective beam center. The inherent characteristic of this approach allows all of the reflectors


204


to be arranged in a few rings


200


. One embodiment of the invention is an antenna configuration which generates each of the beams from an individual reflector


204


, with each beam independently optimized for mainlobe and sidelobe performance.




The antenna configuration can be used in any high frequency application, and particularly the Ku, Ka and higher bands, generating clusters of beams over a wide angular range. However, the invention can also be applied to lower frequency bands when larger antenna assembly can be accommodated.




Although each of the reflectors


204


presented in the foregoing example are nominally eight inches in diameter, the size (i.e. diametric extent in any direction) and/or shape of the reflectors


204


can be can be altered to optimize the design to account for different operating frequencies, platform altitudes, and the size/shape of the cells in the ground pattern


100


or the on-station pattern


104


, and or platform to cell geometry. Similarly, the feeds


204


for each reflector can also be optimized with respect to the same parameters. For example, cells in the on-station pattern


104


located below the platform near the center of the on-station pattern


104


are typically larger than those at the periphery. To account for this difference, the reflectors used to service such cells can be smaller than those used to service the peripheral cells.




Many modifications may be made to this invention without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, any combination of the above components, or any number of different components, and other devices, may be used with the present invention.




CONCLUSION




This concludes the description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. In summary, the present invention teaches a multi-beam antenna system, comprising, in an exemplary embodiment, a first, second and third ring of single beam reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising, in an exemplary embodiment, generating beams from a first, second and third ring of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from the first, second and third ring of single beam feeds on a separate reflector to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a communication system comprising at least one platform having a multi-beam antenna including a plurality of rings, each ring having of plurality of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed; wherein the rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing disclosure relates only to preferred embodiments of the invention and that numerous modifications or alterations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A multi-beam antenna system, comprising:a plurality of rings, each ring having a plurality of single beam reflectors, each reflector having its own feed; wherein the rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.
  • 2. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of rings comprises a first, second and third ring.
  • 3. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 2, wherein the first ring has a smaller diametric extent than the second ring and the second ring has a smaller diametric extent than the third ring.
  • 4. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 2, wherein the first ring is disposed on a higher plane than the second ring and the second ring is disposed on a higher plane than the third ring.
  • 5. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 4, wherein:the single beam reflectors on the third ring are of a different diametric extent than the single beam reflectors of the second ring.
  • 6. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 5, wherein:the single beam reflectors of the third ring are of a larger diametric extent than the single beam reflectors of the second ring.
  • 7. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 2, wherein the feeds for the third ring are positioned between the reflectors of the second ring, the feeds for the second ring are positioned between the reflectors of the first ring, and the feeds for the first ring are disposed on a separate plane above the plane of the first ring.
  • 8. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein all of the single beam reflectors are substantially the same diametric extent.
  • 9. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the single beam reflectors are of different diametric extent.
  • 10. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 9, wherein:each of the single beam reflectors services one of a contiguous group of cells forming an on-station pattern, the cells including cells in a periphery of the on-station pattern and cells in a center of the on-station pattern; and the single beam reflectors servicing the cells in the periphery of the on-station pattern is of a different diametric extent than the single beam reflectors servicing a center of the on-station pattern.
  • 11. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein:at least one of the single beam reflectors and respective feeds servicing the cells include design parameters that are optimized for operational characteristics selected from the group comprising: an altitude of the single beam reflectors; an operating frequency; and on-station cell size.
  • 12. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein all of the single beam reflector are substantially 8 inches in diameter.
  • 13. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the system operates at approximately 20 and 30 GHz.
  • 14. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 13, wherein each of the reflectors are shaped to optimize their performance taking into account sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector at 20 GHz and 30 GHz.
  • 15. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the feeds is a corrugated horn.
  • 16. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein all of the reflectors and their respective feeds have a single offset reflector geometry.
  • 17. A method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising:generating a plurality of beams from a plurality of single beam feeds; reflecting each beam from a separate reflector of a plurality of single beam reflector rings to a substantially separate coverage area; wherein the reflector rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved when viewed from above.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the plurality of single beam reflector rings comprises a first ring, a second ring and a third ring.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the first ring has a smaller diametric extent than the second ring and the second ring has a smaller diametric extent than the third ring.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the first ring is disposed on a higher plane than the second ring and the second ring is disposed on a higher plane than the third ring.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein:the single beam reflectors on the third ring are of a different diametric extent than the single beam reflectors of the second ring.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein:the single beam reflectors of the third ring are of a larger diametric extent than the single beam reflectors of the second ring.
  • 23. The method of claim 18, wherein the feeds for the third ring are positioned between the reflectors of the second ring, the feeds for the second ring are positioned between the reflectors of the first ring, and the feeds for the first ring are disposed on a separate plane higher than the plane of the first ring.
  • 24. The method of claim 17, wherein all of the single beam shaped reflectors are substantially the same diametric extent.
  • 25. The method of claim 17, wherein at least a portion of the single beam reflectors are of different diametric extent.
  • 26. The method of claim 17, wherein:each of the single beam reflectors services one of a contiguous group of cells forming an on-station pattern, the cells including cells in a periphery of the on-station pattern and cells in a center of the on-station pattern; and the single beam reflectors servicing the cells in the periphery of the on-station pattern is of a different diametric extent than the single beam reflectors servicing a center of the on-station pattern.
  • 27. The method of claim 17, wherein:at least one of the single beam reflectors and respective feeds servicing the cells include design parameters that are optimized for operational characteristics selected from the group comprising: an altitude of the single beam reflectors; an operating frequency; and on-station cell size.
  • 28. The method of claim 17, wherein all of the single beam reflector are substantially 8 inches in diameter.
  • 29. The method of claim 17, wherein each of the plurality of beams comprises a 20 and 30 GHz signal.
  • 30. The method of claims 29, wherein all of the reflectors are shaped to optimize the performance at 20 GHz and 30 GHz, taking into account sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector.
  • 31. The method of claim 17, wherein the feeds are corrugated horns.
  • 32. The method of claim 17, wherein all of the reflectors and their respective feeds have a single offset reflector geometry.
  • 33. A communication system, comprising:at least one platform, the platform having a multi-beam antenna including: a plurality of rings, each ring having a plurality single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed; wherein the rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.
  • 34. The communication system of claim 33, wherein the plurality of rings comprises a first, second and third ring.
  • 35. The communication system of claim 34, wherein the first ring has a smaller diametric extent than the second ring and the second ring has a smaller diametric extent than the third ring.
  • 36. The communication system of claim 35, wherein the first ring is disposed on a higher plane than the second ring and the second ring is disposed on a higher plane than the third ring.
  • 37. The communication system of claim 36, wherein the feeds for the third ring are positioned between the reflectors of the second ring, the feeds for the second ring are positioned between the reflectors of the first ring, and the feeds for the first ring are disposed on a separate plane above the plane of the first ring.
  • 38. The communication system of claim 37, wherein all of the single beam reflectors are substantially the same diametric extent.
  • 39. The communication system of claim 38, wherein at least a portion of the single beam reflectors are of different diametric extent.
  • 40. The communication system of claim 33, wherein:each of the single beam reflectors services one of a contiguous group of cells forming an on-station pattern, the cells including cells in a periphery of the on-station pattern and cells in a center of the on-station pattern; and the single beam reflectors servicing the cells in the periphery of the on-station pattern is of a different diametric extent than the single beam reflectors servicing a center of the on-station pattern.
  • 41. The communication system of claim 33, wherein:at least one of the single beam reflectors and respective feeds servicing the cells include design parameters that are optimized for operational characteristics selected from the group comprising: an altitude of the single beam reflectors; an operating frequency; and on-station cell size.
  • 42. The communication system of claim 33, wherein all of the single beam reflector are substantially 8 inches in diameter.
  • 43. The communication system of claim 33, wherein the system operates at 20 and 30 GHz.
  • 44. The communication system of claim 33, wherein each of the reflectors are shaped to optimize their performance taking into account sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector at 20 GHz and 30 GHz.
  • 45. The communication system of claim 33, wherein at least one of the feeds is a corrugated horn.
  • 46. The communication system of claim 33, wherein all of the reflectors and their respective feeds have a single offset reflector geometry.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4823341 Rosen Apr 1989 A
5081464 Renshaw Jan 1992 A
5907816 Newman et al. May 1999 A
5963175 Burr Oct 1999 A
6204822 Cardiasmenos et al. Mar 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
U.S. application No. 09/661,986, Rosen et al., filed Sep. 14, 2000.
K.K. Chan, F. Marcoux, M. Forest, L. Martins-Camelo, “A Circularly Polarized Waveguide Array For Leo Satellite Communications”, pp. 154-157, 1999 IEEE AP-S International Symposium, Jun. 1999.
M. Oodo, R. Miura, Y. Hase, “Onboard DBF Antenna For Stratospheric Platform”, pp. 125-128; IEEE Conference on Phased Array Systems and Technology, California, May 21-25, 2000.
Yokosuka Research Park, “The First Stratospheric Platform Systems Workshop”, pp. 1-216, May 12-13, 1999.