Multi-beam antenna communication system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6781555
  • Patent Number
    6,781,555
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 5, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A communication system and method for reconfigurably transmitting and receiving signals via a multi-beam reflector antenna array are disclosed. The multi-beam antenna system comprises a plurality of rings of single beam reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the plurality of rings are substantially concentric or nested and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved. The method, in one embodiment, comprises generating beams from a first, second and third ring of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from the first, second and third ring of single beam feeds on a separate reflector to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to systems and methods for transmitting communication signals, and in particular to systems and methods for transmitting communication signals across high scan angles.




2. Description of the Related Art




Communications satellites are in widespread use and communication systems based upon high-altitude platforms are under development. Such wireless communications systems are used to deliver television and other communications signals to end users.




The primary design constraints for communications satellites and platforms are antenna beam coverage and radiated Radio Frequency (RF) power. These two design constraints are generally paramount in the payload design because they determine which locations on the ground will be able to receive communications service. In addition, the system weight becomes a factor, because launch vehicles and platforms are limited as to how much payload weight can be placed on station.




Further, in high-altitude platform and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite applications it is often necessary to form multiple antenna beams illuminating the ground. Such communication systems require antennas with on-station beam coverage systems capable of altering the beam scan on the ground as well as the beam shape.




Since it is desirable for ground coverage to be evenly distributed among a wide pattern of cells, producing an even pattern on the ground requires a versatile antenna system capable of high scan angles. This presents a difficult problem to antenna system designers.




Three alternative antenna configurations that are generally known in the art are a multi-feed reflector, a single beam phased array and a multibeam phased array. However, each of these configurations has limitations in high-altitude platform and LEO applications.




One configuration known in the art uses a single parabolic reflector with multiple feeds. In order to generate different beam shapes, multiple feeds are combined using a complex beam forming network. Hence a very large number of feeds and multiple Beam Forming Networks (BFNs) are required. In addition, a very large number of parabolic reflectors, requiring an enormous physical envelope, would be needed to apply this configuration in near Earth applications. Due to the wide angular coverage required, each reflector could be used to produce a spot beam over only a very small portion of the overall coverage area.




Another configuration is described by K. K. Chan, et al.,


A Circularly Polarized Waveguide Array for LEO Satellite Communications


, IEEE AP-S International Symposium, June 1999 which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. The proposed system requires a single beam phased array for each beam. While this approach can be used to form different beam shapes, such a system is costly to produce. Furthermore, due to the inherent nature of a phased array, wide-band operation, necessary for simultaneous transmit-receive applications, can be almost impossible to achieve.




A third configuration known in the art uses a multiple-beam phased array. Antenna configurations using multiple-beam phased arrays are inherently more complex and expensive than other configurations. Furthermore, the wide-angle scanning requirement of near Earth applications necessitates the use of very small elements resulting in a large number of elements in the array, thereby increasing the cost and complexity. Alternatively, a plurality of separate phased arrays may be employed, each one operating over a narrow region, however the complexity and expense would be undiminished.




There is therefore a need in the art for a compact, less costly, antenna system capable of simultaneous transmit-receive applications, without the attendant complexity and/or size of prior art systems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




To address the requirements described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses an apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving signals with a multi-beam reflector antenna assembly.




The present invention teaches a multi-beam antenna assembly, comprising a plurality of rings of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the plurality of rings are substantially nested or concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above. In one embodiment, each feed is diplexed to provide both transmit and receive functionality. In one embodiment, the rings are substantially circular in a concentric configuration. Alternate configurations may employ rings of other shapes in a nested configuration.




The present invention also teaches a method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising generating a plurality of beams from a plurality of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from a separate reflector of a plurality of single beam reflector rings to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the reflector rings are substantially nested/concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a communication system having at least one above-ground platform having a multi-beam antenna including a plurality of rings, each ring having a plurality of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the rings are substantially nested or concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention produces a uniform coverage pattern of cells defined as hexagons on the ground from a near Earth station, orbital or otherwise.




The present invention provides an antenna configuration used to generate multiple beams, with the capability of optimizing each of the beams independently for mainlobe and sidelobe performance.




Each cell is covered by a separate feed and reflector combination. Each feed and reflector can also be optimized to provide uniform cell illumination for both transmit and receive functions.




The present invention can be used to optimize wide-band performance in a simple and effective manner. Further, the number of rings can be extended to generate more beams and thus a greater number of ground cells.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:





FIGS. 1A-1B

illustrate a ground pattern of identical fixed cells with a cell separation of 8 Kms and the corresponding beam pattern as seen from a platform altitude of 20 kilometers;





FIGS. 2A-2C

illustrate a reflector antenna embodiment producing a coverage pattern from 20 km;





FIG. 2D

is a diagram illustrating the payload deployed on an above-ground platform;





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a single offset reflector geometry with a reflector diameter of 8 inches; and





FIGS. 4A-4C

depict examples of central, middle and outer reflector ring beams with suppressed sidelobes.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which is shown, by way of illustration, several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.





FIG. 1A

illustrates a ground pattern


100


in km of sixty-one identical fixed cells


102


with a cell separation of 8 km. The uniform cells


102


are defined as hexagons on the ground.

FIG. 1B

illustrates the corresponding cells


102


in degrees generated from an altitude of 20 km, in the on-station pattern


104


. Due to the inherent geometry, the required antenna scan angle can be very large, requiring an angular sweep greater than ±50° for antennas at or near the nadir. Further, the on-station pattern


104


is distorted when compared to the ground pattern


100


of cells


102


. Such an on-station pattern


104


can be generated by an antenna configuration of the invention.




The exact number of cells


102


used in the ground pattern


100


, as well as the shape of the overall ground pattern


100


can be varied depending upon the specific application. In particular, coverage of one or more of the cells


102


may be omitted if the region is located in an unpopulated or inaccessible area. Likewise, additional cells


102


may be included to cover appended geography. The overall ground pattern


100


may have the shape of any geography within the scan range of the on-station pattern


104


. In addition, individual cells


102


may have different shapes; uniform ground cell shapes are not required.





FIGS. 2A-2C

depicts one embodiment of a multi-beam satellite system


250


comprising three sets of twenty reflectors


202


arranged in substantially concentric circular reflector rings


200


A-


200


C (hereinafter alternatively collectively referred to as reflector ring(s)


200


) to cover any


60


of the


61


cells in the ground pattern


100


. Each reflector


202


is used to produce coverage of one cell


102


in the overall coverage pattern


100


,


104


. Each reflector


202


has its own feed


204


. As shown in

FIG. 2C

, the first, second and third reflector rings


200


are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors


202


of adjacent rings


200


are substantially interleaved as viewed from above. This configuration allows for a compact arrangement of a large number of reflectors


202


having optimized fields of view.




In the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, the reflector rings


200


are substantially circular. Alternate configurations may employ rings


200


of other shapes which are nested and disposed on separate planes and similarly present reflectors


202


of adjacent rings


200


substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




Also in the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, inner reflector rings


200


A of smaller diametric extent (e.g. diameter, for circular reflector rings) are disposed at higher planes, nearer to ground. Alternate configurations may arrange the rings


200


such that the outer reflector rings


200


are disposed at higher planes or employ a mixture of higher and lower planes of rings


200


as necessary to achieve optimal coverage for a given application.




As previously discussed, one cell


106


in the example coverage pattern


100


,


104


of

FIGS. 1A and 1B

is not covered and therefore does not receive a beam from one of the reflectors


202


. The antenna of

FIGS. 2A-2C

covers sixty of the sixty-one cells of FIG.


1


A. Coverage of any cell


102


may be omitted depending upon the particular geography and application of the antenna. In addition, cells may also overlap to achieve better performance or expanded service.




The correspondence between cells


102


and reflectors


202


is determined in part according to field of view considerations. Although the invention produces a versatile antenna whereby most reflectors


202


have potential fields of view including many, if not all, cells


102


in the coverage pattern


100


,


104


, some reflectors


202


may not have a potential field of view including some cells


102


due to obstruction by the structure. For example, in the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, a reflector


202


of the outermost ring


200


may not have a view of a cell


102


located on the opposite side of the coverage pattern


100


,


104


, depending upon the platform


252


or satellite orientation and the required scan angle. However, an optimal field of view design using the invention for a specified application is easily developed with the reflector rings


200


arranged at different planes. In the embodiment of

FIGS. 2A-2C

, reflectors


202


of the outer reflector rings


200


generally cover outer cells


102


of the coverage pattern


100


,


104


nearest to the particular reflector


202


.




In addition, the present invention can optionally incorporate an efficient structure as shown in

FIGS. 2A-2C

. The feed horns


204


for the third reflector rings


200


C are affixed to support structure


208


of the second reflector ring


200


B between the reflectors


202


. The feed horns


204


for the first reflector ring


200


A are attached to a feed horn ring structure


206


disposed from the first reflector ring


200


. This particular structure of the feed horns


204


is not essential for operation of the present invention, however.





FIG. 2D

is a diagram showing the implementation of the multibeam antenna system


250


on an above-ground or high altitude platform


252


.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a single offset reflector geometry


300


used in one embodiment of the present invention. All the sixty beams of the example embodiment are individually produced by reflectors


302


of a substantially identical diameter of 8 inches. Each reflector


302


is separately fed by a high performance feed horn


304


operating at two or more operating frequencies or frequency bands, 20 and 30 GHz for example. One or more of the feeds may be corrugated horns.




Alternatively, individual reflectors


302


may be individually shaped and/or sized (e.g. of different diametric extent) to optimize the performance at the two frequency bands, taking into account the sidelobe suppression required in some of the cells


102


. The use of shaped reflectors


302


allows for a much more efficient and compact antenna configuration. Also, although uniformity of the reflectors


302


is desirable to facilitate manufacturing, individual reflectors


302


may be customized for custom applications or services.





FIGS. 4A-4C

illustrate radiation patterns


400


,


402


, and


404


at 20 GHz for three example cells


102


respectively from the central, middle and outer rings. In order to use the similar reflector geometry for all the beams


102


, each reflector


302


position is appropriately rotated to point at its respective beam center. The inherent characteristic of this approach allows all of the reflectors


302


to be arranged in a few rings


200


. One embodiment of the invention is an antenna configuration which generates each of the beams from an individual reflector


302


, with each beam independently optimized for mainlobe and sidelobe performance.




The antenna configuration can be used in any high frequency application, and particularly the Ku, Ka and higher bands, generating clusters of beams over a wide angular range. However, the invention can also be applied to lower frequency bands when larger antenna assembly can be accommodated.




Although each of the reflectors


302


presented in the foregoing example are nominally eight inches in diameter, the size (i.e. diametric extent in any direction) and/or shape of the reflectors


302


can be altered to optimize the design to account for different operating frequencies, platform altitudes, and the size/shape of the cells in the ground pattern


100


or the on-station pattern


104


, and/or platform to cell geometry. Similarly, the feeds


304


for each reflector can also be optimized with respect to the same parameters. For example, cells in the on-station pattern


104


located below the platform near the center of the on-station pattern


104


are typically larger than those at the periphery. To account for this difference, the reflectors used to service such cells can be smaller than those used to service the peripheral cells.




Many modifications may be made to this invention without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, any combination of the above components, or any number of different components, and other devices, may be used with the present invention.




Conclusion




This concludes the description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. In summary, the present invention teaches a multi-beam antenna system, comprising, in an exemplary embodiment, a first, second and third ring of single beam reflectors, each reflector having its own feed, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising, in an exemplary embodiment, generating beams from a first, second and third ring of single beam feeds, respectively reflecting each beam from the first, second and third ring of single beam feeds on a separate reflector to a substantially separate coverage area, wherein the first, second and third rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The present invention also teaches a communication system comprising at least one platform having a multi-beam antenna including a plurality of rings, each ring having a plurality of single beam shaped reflectors, each reflector having its own feed; wherein the rings are substantially concentric and disposed on separate planes such that the shaped reflectors of adjacent rings are substantially interleaved as viewed from above.




The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing disclosure relates only to preferred embodiments of the invention and that numerous modifications or alterations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A multi-beam antenna system for generating multiple beams, comprisinga plurality of single beam reflectors, each having its own feed, the plurality of single beam reflectors producing a plurality of beams, each beam serving a substantially separate cell of an on-station pattern; and wherein at least one of the plurality of beams is optimized for an operational characteristic.
  • 2. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes mainlobe performance.
  • 3. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes sidelobe performance.
  • 4. The multibeam antenna of claim 3, wherein the sidelobe performance includes sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector.
  • 5. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes a size of the cell served by the beam.
  • 6. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes a shape of the cell served by the beam.
  • 7. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein the plurality of reflectors are disposed on a platform and the operational characteristic includes platform to cell geometry.
  • 8. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes an altitude of the single beam reflectors.
  • 9. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes an operating frequency.
  • 10. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes a beam field of view.
  • 11. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the operational characteristic includes uniform illumination of the cell.
  • 12. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein a reflector associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is shaped to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 13. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein a feed associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is optimized to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 14. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein each reflector is pointed at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 15. The multi-beam antenna system of claim 1, wherein each reflector is rotated to point at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 16. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein a shape of at least one of the cells of the on-station pattern is different than a shape of another one of the cells of the on-station pattern.
  • 17. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein coverage of one or more cells of the on-station pattern is omitted.
  • 18. The multi-beam antenna of claim 1, wherein one or more cells of the on-station pattern overlap.
  • 19. A method of producing multiple antenna beams, comprising:generating a plurality of beams from a plurality of single beam feeds; and reflecting each beam from a separate reflector of a plurality of single beam reflector rings to a substantially separate coverage area; wherein at least one of the single beam reflectors or respective feeds servicing the cells includes design parameters that are optimized for an operational characteristic.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes mainlobe performance.
  • 21. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes sidelobe performance.
  • 22. Thc method of claim 21, wherein the sidelobe performance includes sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector.
  • 23. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes a size of the cell served by the beam.
  • 24. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes a shape of the cell served by the beam.
  • 25. The method of claim 19, wherein the plurality of reflectors are disposed on a platform and the operational characteristic includes platform to cell geometry.
  • 26. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes an altitude of the single beam reflectors.
  • 27. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes an operating frequency.
  • 28. The method of claim 19, wherein the operational characteristic includes a beam field of view.
  • 29. The method of claim 19, wherein a reflector associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is shaped to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 30. The method of claim 19, wherein a feed associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is optimized to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 31. The method of claim 19, wherein each reflector is pointed at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 32. The method of claim 19, wherein each reflector is rotated to point at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 33. The method of claim 19, wherein a shape of at least one of the cells of the on-station pattern is different than a shape of another one of the cells of the on-station pattern.
  • 34. The method of claim 19, wherein the on-station pattern omits one or more cells.
  • 35. The method of claim 19, wherein one or more cells of the on-station pattern overlap.
  • 36. The multibeam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the single beam reflectors are disposed at a high altitude.
  • 37. The multibeam antenna system of claim 8, wherein the altitude of the single beam reflectors is a high altitude.
  • 38. The multibeam antenna system of claim 1, wherein the single beam reflectors are disposed above ground.
  • 39. The method of claim 19, wherein the single beam reflectors are disposed at a high altitude.
  • 40. The method of claim 26, wherein the altitude of the single beam reflectors is a high altitude.
  • 41. The method of claim 19, wherein the single beam reflectors are disposed above ground.
  • 42. A high altitude platform, comprising:a multi-beam antenna system for generating multiple beams, including a plurality of single beam reflectors, each having its own feed, the plurality of single beam reflectors producing a plurality of beams, each beam serving a substantially separate cell of an on-station pattern; and wherein at least one of the plurality of beams are optimized for an operational characteristic.
  • 43. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes mainlobe performance.
  • 44. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes sidelobe performance.
  • 45. The high altitude platform of claim 44, wherein the sidelobe performance includes sidelobe suppression over an associated cell of each reflector.
  • 46. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes a size of the cell served by the beam.
  • 47. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes a shape of the cell served by the beam.
  • 48. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the plurality of reflectors are disposed on a platform and the operational characteristic includes platform to cell geometry.
  • 49. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes an altitude of the single beam reflectors.
  • 50. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes an operating frequency.
  • 51. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes a beam field of view.
  • 52. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the operational characteristic includes uniform illumination of the cell.
  • 53. Thc high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein a reflector associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is shaped to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 54. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein feed associated with the at least one of the plurality of beams is optimized to provide the optimized operational characteristic.
  • 55. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein each reflector is pointed at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 56. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein each reflector is rotated to point at a center of the beam produced by the reflector.
  • 57. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein a shape of at least one of the cells of the on-station pattern is different than a shape of another one of the cells of the on-station pattern.
  • 58. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein the on-station pattern omits one or more cells.
  • 59. The high altitude platform of claim 42, wherein one or more cells of the on-station pattern overlap.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/703,605, filed on Oct. 31, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,634, entitled “Multi-Beam Antenna Communication System and Method”, inventors Parthasarathy Ramanujam, Harold A. Rosen, Mark T. Austin and William D. Beightol, now pending, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (82)
Number Name Date Kind
3541553 Gubin Nov 1970 A
3720953 Ajioka Mar 1973 A
4236161 Ohm Nov 1980 A
4343005 Han et al. Aug 1982 A
4635063 Chang et al. Jan 1987 A
4799065 Thompson Jan 1989 A
4819227 Rosen Apr 1989 A
4823341 Rosen Apr 1989 A
5017927 Agrawal et al. May 1991 A
5081464 Renshaw Jan 1992 A
5151706 Roederer et al. Sep 1992 A
5257030 Aoki et al. Oct 1993 A
5339330 Mallinckrodt Aug 1994 A
5365239 Stilwell, Jr. Nov 1994 A
5552798 Dietrich et al. Sep 1996 A
5584047 Tuck Dec 1996 A
5594941 Dent Jan 1997 A
5652597 Caille Jul 1997 A
5754139 Turcotte et al. May 1998 A
5764187 Rudish et al. Jun 1998 A
5790070 Natarajan et al. Aug 1998 A
5818395 Wolcott et al. Oct 1998 A
5856804 Turcotte et al. Jan 1999 A
5903549 Von der Embse et al. May 1999 A
5907816 Newman et al. May 1999 A
5909460 Dent Jun 1999 A
5917447 Wang et al. Jun 1999 A
5946625 Hassan et al. Aug 1999 A
5963175 Burr Oct 1999 A
5966371 Sherman Oct 1999 A
5973647 Barrett et al. Oct 1999 A
5974317 Djuknic et al. Oct 1999 A
5974324 Henson Oct 1999 A
5982337 Newman et al. Nov 1999 A
5990839 Schefte et al. Nov 1999 A
6002935 Wang Dec 1999 A
6014372 Kent et al. Jan 2000 A
6016124 Lo et al. Jan 2000 A
6018316 Rudish et al. Jan 2000 A
6034634 Karlsson et al. Mar 2000 A
6061562 Martin et al. May 2000 A
6088341 Hinedi et al. Jul 2000 A
6111542 Day et al. Aug 2000 A
6147658 Higashi et al. Nov 2000 A
6150977 Wilcoxson et al. Nov 2000 A
6151308 Ibanez-Meier et al. Nov 2000 A
6157621 Brown et al. Dec 2000 A
6169910 Tamil et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173178 Hammill et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188896 Perahia et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195037 Gross et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204822 Cardiasmenos et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204823 Spano et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208858 Antonio et al. Mar 2001 B1
6240072 Lo et al. May 2001 B1
6259415 Kumpfbeck et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266528 Farzaneh Jul 2001 B1
6289004 Mesecher et al. Sep 2001 B1
6317412 Natali et al. Nov 2001 B1
6339708 Wang Jan 2002 B1
6366256 Ramanujam et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377802 McKenna et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380893 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6388615 Chang et al. May 2002 B1
6392611 Smith et al. May 2002 B1
6414646 Luh Jul 2002 B2
6429823 Bains et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434384 Norin et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452962 Linsky et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456846 Norin et al. Sep 2002 B2
6463282 Norin et al. Oct 2002 B2
6463294 Holma et al. Oct 2002 B1
6507314 Chang et al. Jan 2003 B2
6556845 Ide et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559797 Chang May 2003 B1
6567052 Wang et al. May 2003 B1
20010048389 Nakagawa Dec 2001 A1
20020006795 Norin Jan 2002 A1
20020050946 Chang et al. May 2002 A1
20020126042 Chang et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140602 Chang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030076258 Chang et al. Apr 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
0 549 220 Jun 1993 EP
0 776 099 May 1997 EP
0 860 952 Aug 1998 EP
0 961 416 Dec 1999 EP
1 122 813 Aug 2001 EP
1 161 001 Dec 2001 EP
2 349 045 Oct 2000 GB
2001345747 Dec 2001 JP
WO 9707609 Feb 1997 WO
WO 0195520 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0195523 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197388 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197406 Dec 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/661,986, Rosen et al., filed Sep. 14, 2000.
K. K. Chan, F. Marcoux, M. Forest, L. Martins-Camelo, “A Circularly Polarized Waveguide Array for Leo Satellite Communications”, pp. 154-157, 1999 IEEE AP-S International Symposium, Jun. 1999.
M. Oodo, R. Miura, Y. Hase, “Onboard DBF Antenna for Stratospheric Platform”, pp. 125-128, IEEE Conference on Phased Array Systems and Technology, California, May 21-25, 2000.
Yokosuka Research Park, “The First Stratospheric Platform Systems Workshop”, pp 1-216, May 12-13, 1999.
Suzuki, R. et. al, :Mobile TDM/TDMA System With Active Array Antenna, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1991; Globecom '91, vol. 3, Dec. 2-5, 1991, pp. 1569-1573.
Miura, Ryu et. al, “A DBF Self-Beam Steering Array Antenna for Mobile Satellite Applications Using Beam-Space Maximal-Ratio Combination”, IEEE Trans. On Vehicular Technology, vol. 48, No. 3, May 1999, pp. 665-675.
Sato, Kazuo et al., “Development And Field Experiments of Phased Array Antenna For Land Vehicle Satellite Communications”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1992, Jul. 1992, pp. 1073-1076.
Sakakibara, Kunio et. al, “A Two-Beam Slotted Leaky Waveguide Array for Mobile Reception of Dual-Polarization DBS”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 48, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 1-7.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/703605 Oct 2000 US
Child 10/093117 US