The technology described herein relates to vehicle suspension systems, specifically, to linkages within a vehicle suspension system.
Vehicle suspension terminology depends upon the reference frame considered. Consider a static vehicle that has two wheels, each of which are supported by the ground and a suspended body, which is operatively coupled to each wheel. In a two-wheel vehicle, such as a bicycle, electric bicycle or pedelec or motorcycle, etc. there is typically one rear wheel known as the driven wheel, which includes a driven cog. There is also one front wheel. A driving cog is operatively coupled to the suspended body. A driving chain or belt connects the driven cog and the driving cog. The driving cog, which is connected to the driven cog via the driving chain/belt, is rotated by a crank under human power, or by a motor, or by combined motor and human power. The reaction of the driven wheel and the ground causes the vehicle to accelerate forward, or in the general direction from the rear wheel to the front wheel. Rearward is then defined as the general direction from the front wheel to the rear wheel.
A linkage operatively couples the suspended body and the driven wheel. A linkage may be composed of multiple bodies (often referred to as links or members) that are operatively coupled to each other in a manner that allows the bodies to flex, cam, rotate or translate relative to one another. The linkage constrains the movement in which the driven wheel and brake may travel relative to the suspended body. A combination of damper(s) and/or spring(s) is/are typically arranged to react to relative motion between the suspended body and the driven wheel. The linkage is highly responsible for the vehicle's dynamic response to acceleration and deceleration as well as the mechanical advantage over the shock/damper.
With a typical 4-bar linkage rear suspension system, the acceleration response, the deceleration response, and the mechanical advantage over the shock/damper are significantly dependent upon one another. This makes it difficult to optimize all three, and as a result these designs result in compromise in the quality of the ride.
The information included in this Background section of the specification, including any references cited herein and any description or discussion thereof, is included for technical reference purposes and is not to be regarded subject matter by which the scope of the invention as defined in the claims is to be bound.
The technology disclosed herein relates to vehicle suspension linkages. In one embodiment, a two-wheel vehicle suspension linkage is provided. The suspension includes a suspended body-1, a swingarm body-2, a link body-3, a link body-4, a link body-5, and a link body-6 operatively coupled with one another. The link body-3 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining a IVC[1][3], and the link body-5 defining an IVC[3][5]. The link body-4 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining an IVC[1][4], and the link body-5 defining an IVC[4][5]. The link body-5 includes an additional jointed connection with swingarm body-2 defining an IVC[2][5]. The link body-6 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining an IVC[1][6], and the swingarm body-2 defining an IVC[2][6]. IVC[2][5] is not common with IVC[3][5] or IVC[4][5]. Suspended body-1, link body-3, link body-4 and link body-5 are arranged in a Watts 4-bar configuration. This arrangement defines seven “physical” IVCs known as PIVCs: PIVC[1][3], PIVC[1][4], PIVC[1][6], PIVC[3][5], PIVC[4][5], PIVC[2][5], PIVC[2][6]; which are further explained in the spec. The suspension includes a damper unit configured to resist movement between two or more of the suspended body-1, swingarm body-2, link body-3, link body-4, link body-5, or link body-6. The damper unit may include an extension body or bodies to increase its effective length.
In yet another embodiment, a two-wheel vehicle suspension linkage is provided. The suspension includes a suspended body-1, a swingarm body-2, a link body-3, a link body-4, a link body-5, and a link body-6 operatively coupled with one another. The link body-3 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining an IVC[1][3], and the link body-5 defining an IVC[3][5]. The link body-4 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining an IVC[1][4], and the link body-5 defining an IVC[4][5]. The link body-5 includes an additional jointed connection with swingarm body-2 defining an IVC[2][5]. The link body-6 includes jointed connections with the suspended body-1 defining an IVC[1][6], and the swingarm body-2 defining an IVC[2][6]. IVC[2][5] is not common with IVC[3][5] or IVC[4][5]. Suspended body-1, link body-3, link body-4 and link body-5 are arranged in a Chebushev 4-bar configuration. This arrangement defines seven PIVCs: PIVC[1][3], PIVC[1][4], PIVC[1][6], PIVC[3][5], PIVC[4][5], PIVC[2][5], PIVC[2][6]. The suspension includes a damper unit configured to resist movement between two or more of the suspended body-1, swingarm body-2, link body-3, link body-4, link body-5, or link body-6. The migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature that inflects. The suspension includes a damper unit configured to resist movement between two or more of the suspended body-1, swingarm body-2, link body-3, link body-4, link body-5, or link body-6. The damper unit may include an extension body or bodies to increase its effective length.
Various exemplary aspects of the embodiments described above are provided. Each of these aspects can be additionally or alternatively applied to each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In other configurations, each of these aspects can be absent from each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In one aspect, migration paths of PIVC[2][5], PIVC[3][5], and PIVC[4][5] reverse as the suspension moves from the extended state at least partially to the compressed state.
Various exemplary aspects of the embodiments described above are provided. Each of these aspects can be additionally or alternatively applied to each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In other configurations, each of these aspects can be absent from each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In one aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 1,000 mm. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 10,000 mm. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 100,000 mm. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 200,000 mm. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 300,000 mm. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has curvature greater than 0 and a minimum radius of curvature greater than 400,000 mm.
Various exemplary aspects of the embodiments described above are provided. Each of these aspects can be additionally or alternatively applied to each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In other configurations, each of these aspects can be absent from each of the embodiments discussed above in the summary. In one aspect, the curvature of migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state has an inflection point. In another aspect, the radius of curvature of the migration path of PIVC[2][5] increases and then decreases from one end of the path to the other. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state is located within the area of a circle with a diameter of 200 mm centered at the driving cog axis. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state is located within the area of a circle with a diameter of 300 mm centered at the driving cog axis. In another aspect, the migration path of PIVC[2][5] defined from a fully extended to fully compressed state is located within the area of a circle with a diameter of 400 mm centered at the driving cog axis.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. A more extensive presentation of features, details, utilities, and advantages of the present invention as defined in the claims is provided in the following written description of various embodiments and implementations and illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Disclosed herein is as a system or linkage that operatively couples a suspended body to a driven wheel. In accordance with the various embodiments provided herein, the suspension system linkage improves suspension performance based on the interrelationships of its linkage bodies and the related instantaneous velocity centers (IVCs). In one example, the linkage has 15 IVCs. In particular, the linkage may be a 6-bar linkage.
Various theories, methods, algorithms or analysis systems are provided herein. These systems are provided for better understanding of the structures and configurations described. Unless specifically claimed, the systems are not limiting regardless of current accuracy or subsequent clarifications or understandings of the structures and configurations that may be determined by persons of ordinary skill in the art.
Accordingly, provided herein are various methods or algorithms suitable for analyzing suspension systems. For example, various methods are provided for calculating unknown IVCs of a linkage for a suspension system. Such analytical methods are provided for fuller understanding of the various mechanisms discussed herein. For example, a triangular method may be used to determine an unknown IVC of interest. Additionally, or alternatively, plotting the positional relationships of IVCs in a linkage of a suspension can be utilized. Accordingly, the positions of IVCs may change depending on the configuration of the system. A particular IVC may be in a different position depending on whether the system is in a compressed or extended state. IVC migration paths can be determined and vectors running tangential to such migration paths can be analyzed. Thus, the interrelationships between IVCs can be analyzed, allowing for a mathematical analysis of the movement of the linkage subsystem. Finally, methods to calculate anti-squat, anti-rise, and leverage rate is detailed.
It is understood that throughout this disclosure the relationship of various linkages are described with respect to characteristics of those linkages. One analysis system useful for assessing these relationships is the Mobility Analysis of Mechanisms. The Mobility Analysis of Mechanisms (Kutzbach (or Grübler) mobility criterion) may be used to describe the mobility, or output degree of freedom of a linkage. This system may be used to describe the mobility m of a planar linkage composed of n links that are coupled with p flexible joints/pivots. In the various embodiments, discussed herein, the links can be connected via these flexible joints/pivots allowing some degree of freedom between one another. Additionally, the relationship of the links via the joints define various characteristics such as instantaneous velocity centers (IVCs). In various examples as applied to the various embodiments discussed herein, the flexible joints/pivots, or pivotal connections can include revolute, slider, cam joints, or any other suitable flexible joints or pivots that allow one degree of freedom movement between the two links they connect. Notably, flexible joints may include intermediary devices connecting the linkages. Depending on the types of joints, quality of joints, or the tolerances in the joints, characteristics (e.g. the IVCs or other characteristics discussed herein) may have small variances between joints due to real world engineering constraints and calculations. Terminology such as generally, substantially, or other similar terms may be used to account for the expected, calculated, or otherwise real-world accuracy of the characteristics discussed herein while allowing for real world variance in the characteristics. Note that if bodies are coupled as one and not considered completely rigid, a specific joint (e.g. a revolute joint) may be assumed theoretically for analysis near the point of flexure in the flexible joint. Also, note that although the linkage is considered planar kinematically, the assembly of the mechanism may be 3-dimensional.
The following equation is used for analysis of the various systems herein:
mobility=m=3(n−1−p)+p
As an example, this equation may be applied to a 4-bar linkage. The following solves the equation for a 4-bar linkage:
p=n=4
m=3(n−1−p)+p
m=3(4−1−4)+4
m=3(−1)+4
m=−3+4
m=1
As another example, this equation may be applied to a 6-bar linkage. The following solves the equation for a 6-bar linkage:
n=6
p=7
m=3(n−1−p)+p
m=3(6−1−7)+7
m=3(−2)+7
m=−6+7
m=1
In both noted 4-bar and 6-bar linkages, m=1, or there is one degree of freedom of motion. Therefore, the path of the axis of the driven wheel, known as the driven wheel axis path (DWAP) may be constrained to planar motion along a defined path or curve relative to the suspended body. This path or curve includes one end-point defined as the extended state, and another end-point as the compressed state. Any point on this curve or path between the extended and compressed points is known as an intermediate state. An intermediate state on an IVC migration curve or path correlates to an intermediate state of the linkage positions.
Additionally, methods of analyzing vehicle suspension linkages design for its dynamic response is also disclosed. In one example, this method of analysis includes a collection of the system instantaneous velocity centers (IVCs), which can be determined graphically. An IVC is a point common to two linkage bodies where there is zero relative velocity. These IVCs change location instantaneously as the suspension is cycled from its extended to compressed state. The path of each IVC migration may then be plotted graphically as a path, curve, or spline from the extended to the compressed state. These IVC curves depend upon the reference frame considered. In various embodiments, the suspended body is considered fixed as the driven wheel moves from the extended to the compressed state. Total suspension travel (VWT[T]) is then defined as the perpendicular distance relative to the ground line at the extended state as measured between the extended suspension state point and the compressed suspension state point on the driven wheel axis path.
It is possible for an IVC, known as a stationary IVC (SIVC), to have little to no migration from the extended to the compressed state. One example would be an IVC where a link body is operatively connected to the suspended body. This is a result of the front-triangle remaining fixed in the reference frame chosen for suspension analysis.
For reference herein, specific instantaneous velocity centers of a linkage are denoted as IVC[Body-A][Body-B], Body-A and Body-B being the relevant bodies in the relationship. For example, IVC[1][2] is the instantaneous velocity center relative to a body-1 and a body-2. Additionally, IVC[1][2] is equivalent to IVC[2][1].
The structure surrounding the suspension system may include several bodies. In various examples, the structure may include a suspended body. In various embodiments, the suspended body can be suitable to be supported by suspension and support a user over the suspension. In various examples, the structure may include a “wheel carrier” body, which is operatively coupled to the driven wheel, a “brake carrier” body, which is operatively coupled to the driven wheel brake, or a “dynamic body” (DB), which is any combination of a wheel carrier and a brake carrier body (e.g., DB=wheel carrier body, or DB=brake carrier body, or DB=wheel and brake carrier body).
Specific IVC migrations called dynamic IVCs (DIVCs) may be utilized to determine the vehicle's dynamic response. The DIVCs depend upon the specific linkage layout but also depend upon suspended body-1 since this is the body in which a passenger or rider will be included. Suspended body-1 is often called the front triangle of a bicycle.
As used herein DIVC[AD] can define both the acceleration and deceleration response of the vehicle.
As used herein DIVC[A] can define the acceleration response of the vehicle.
As used herein DIVC[D] can define the deceleration response of the vehicle.
As used herein DIVC[C] is defined as a DIVC that includes the acceleration component. DIVC[C] can be equal to DIVC[A] or DIVC[AD].
As used herein DIVC[E] is defined as a DIVC that includes the deceleration component. DIVC[E] can be equal to DIVC[D] or DIVC[AD].
As used herein DIVC is a general term and therefore a DIVC may be a DIVC[AD] or a DIVC[A] or a DIVC[D] or a DIVC[C] or a DIVC[E]. As used herein DIVC[L] is the length of the DIVC migration path, spline or curve.
In accordance with various embodiments, the body-X can be both a wheel carrier and a brake carrier body. In such an embodiment, there is a single DIVC[AD] migration, DIVC[AD][1][X].
In accordance with various embodiments, wheel carrier body-Y can be separate from the brake carrier body-Z. In such an embodiment, there are two DIVCs, DIVC[A][1][Y] and DIVC[D][1][Z].
Finally, in accordance with various embodiments, the wheel carrier body-Y is pivotally concentric to a brake carrier body-Z. In this case, again there are two DIVCs, DIVC[A][1][Y] and DIVC[D][1][Z]].
Each of these various embodiments can be variously applied to the embodiments and examples of the various systems discussed in more detail below.
For purposes of understanding, but not to be limiting, it can be noted that the point in which the force of gravity acts on the sum of the suspended vehicle mass (also known as the sprung mass) and any additional mass such as a passenger or cargo that is supported by the suspension is known as the center of gravity (COG). In the static case, with both wheels on the ground, the force due to the suspended mass through the COG is supported by the vehicles two wheels. Depending on the COG location and the wheelbase of the vehicle, the distribution of force between the two wheels may vary. When the vehicle accelerates, load transfer occurs and the force distribution between the two wheels changes. The rear wheel load is increased while the front wheel load is decreased. Thus, the rear suspension tends to compress or squat. Driving forces of the vehicle such as a chain or belt may be utilized to counteract the tendency to squat during acceleration. This is known in vehicle dynamics as anti-squat.
Anti-squat is typically described as a percentage value. 100% anti-squat is when the anti-squat force is equal and opposite to the load transfer force due to acceleration. As a result, the system is in equilibrium and no suspension squat occurs. Over 100% anti-squat is when the anti-squat force is both opposite and greater than the load transfer force and therefore the suspension extends during acceleration. Anti-squat of 0% is when there is zero anti-squat force to counteract the load transfer and therefore suspension squats during acceleration. Anti-squat between 0-100% is when the anti-squat force is both opposite and less than the load transfer force and therefore the suspension squats during acceleration but to a lesser degree than with 0% anti-squat. A negative anti-squat percentage is when the anti-squat force acts in the same direction on the rear wheel as the load transfer force and therefore the squat due to load transfer is magnified. Anti-squat is directly related to the DIVC[C] migration of the suspension linkage. Anti-squat around or slightly above 100% is ideal where pedaling occurs typically around the first half of travel to improve pedaling efficiency. After this point, an anti-squat below 100% is ideal so that the driving force is minimized, and the suspension can be utilized later in the travel where pedaling typically does not occur. This also minimizes feedback from the driving force to the rider. Too high of an anti-squat is less than ideal because it results in high feedback from the driving force to the rider and is detrimental to pedaling efficiency because the load transfer and anti-squat force are far from equilibrium.
When the vehicle decelerates, the force distribution changes and the front wheel load is increased while the rear wheel load is decreased. As a result, the rear suspension tends to extend or rise. This is known in vehicle dynamics as anti-rise. The magnitude of anti-rise is directly related to the DIVC[E] migration.
100% anti-rise is when the anti-rise force is equal and opposite to the load transfer force due to deceleration. As a result, the system is in equilibrium and no suspension rise occurs. Over 100% anti-rise is when the anti-rise force is both opposite and greater than the load transfer force and therefore the suspension squats during deceleration. Anti-rise of 0% is when there is zero anti-rise force to counteract the load transfer and therefore suspension rises during deceleration. Anti-rise between 0-100% is when the anti-rise force is both opposite and less than the load transfer force and therefore the suspension rises during deceleration but to a lesser degree than with 0% anti-rise. A negative anti-rise percentage is when the anti-rise force acts in the same direction on the rear wheel as the load transfer force and therefore the rise due to load transfer is magnified. Anti-rise less than 100% may help improve traction while anti-rise greater than 0% may help stabilize geometry during deceleration. Therefore, an anti-rise in the 50-100% can be a suitable range for an improved ride.
Based upon the number of bodies present in the structure, the total number of instantaneous velocity centers (IVCs) can be determined. The following equation can be used:
As an example, this equation may be applied to a 4-bar linkage. In this example, n=4. The following solves the equation for a 4-bar linkage:
This example shows that there are 6 total instantaneous velocity centers for a 4-bar linkage.
As another example, this equation may be applied to a 6-bar linkage. In this example, n=6. The following solves the equation for a 6-bar linkage:
This example shows that there are 15 total instantaneous velocity centers for a 6-bar linkage.
In accordance with various embodiments, the suspension system can include a suspension setup having more than four links. It may be noted that while some of the concepts discussed herein might be accomplished with four links, in some of the embodiments discuss herein, as shown herein by example, six links are used. As is suitable, more or fewer links can also be used to accomplish the various concepts as discussed herein.
As noted above, there are 15 IVCs in a 6-bar linkage.
A selection of the 15 total IVCs can be determined visually without being derived using other IVCs as further described below. As used herein, these IVCs are known as physical IVCs, or PIVCs. PIVCs are defined at the pivotal axes or virtual pivotal axes of jointed linkage body members. There are four PIVCs in a 4-bar linkage while there are seven PIVCs in a 6-bar linkage. As an example, and with further explanation detailed below, solid lines shown in
Turning now to the figures for embodiment 1, in accordance with various embodiments the suspension system can include a 6-bar linkage.
Note that in all figures, “-E” denotes the extended state, “-I” denotes the inflection state, “-C” denotes the compressed state, while “-M” denotes a migration path. It is possible that other embodiments do not have a state of inflection. For example, swingarm body 2 can refer to any position between the extended and compressed states, while swingarm body 2 is labeled as 2-E in
In
In accordance with various embodiments, the lower linkage 200 can include a link 3, a link 4 and a link 5. In various examples, the link body 3-E is operatively coupled to suspended body 1 defining PIVC[1][3] 40 and link body 5-E defining PIVC[3][5] 43-E. Link body 4-E is operatively coupled to suspended body 1 defining PIVC[1][4] 41 and link body 5-E defining PIVC[4][5] 44-E. Link body 6-E is operatively coupled to suspended body 1 defining PIVC[1][6] 42 and swingarm body 2-E defining PIVC[2][6] 46-E. Swingarm body 2-E is operatively coupled to link body 5-E defining PIVC[2][5] 45-E. PIVC[2][5] is not common with PIVC[3][5] or PIVC [4][5]. Suspended body-1, link body-3, link body-4 and link body-5 are arranged in a Watts 4-bar configuration. Effective shock/damper body 8-E is operatively coupled to suspended body 1 at 9 and link body 6-E at 47-E.
Seven of the total 15 IVCs in the embodiment 1 are PIVCs: PIVC[1][3] 40, PIVC[1][4] 41, PIVC[1][6] 42; PIVC[3][5] 43-E, PIVC[4][5] 44-E, PIVC[2][5] 45-E, and PIVC[2][6] 46-E. Considering the reference frames discussed, the front triangle is assumed to be stationary for suspension analysis. As a result, PIVCs located on the front triangle may be stationary, or SIVCs. Therefore, these PIVCs do not have the notation of “-E”, “-I” or “-C” discussed previously. Examples of these are: PIVC[1][3] 40, PIVC[1][4] 41, and PIVC[1][6] 42. Also, if the “-E”, “-I” or “-C” suffix is not present, it may be that an IVC at an instance other than these three discrete locations is being discussed.
The smaller envelope of the linkage design as disclosed herein can have several advantages structurally: For example, there is more clearance between the rear tire and the suspended body allowing for a shorter distance from the driving cog axis to the driven wheel axis. This can be a performance benefit allowing for quicker turning. The added tire clearance provides more room for dirt and mud that can build up when riding. This added clearance also allows room for a larger “bridge” tying together the drive and non-drive sides of swingarm body 2 which aids in torsional stiffness. The added clearance in front of the driving cog axis provides more room to fit a water bottle and other accessories within the frame of suspended body 1.
The smaller envelope of the linkage design as disclosed herein can have several advantages kinematically because there is more freedom to locate PIVC[2][5] 45 and therefore a greater ability to tune parameters such as anti-squat, anti-rise, and leverage rate which translates to greater performance. Also, PIVC[2][5] migration paths are able to have an extremely large minimum radius of curvature, or unique curvature profiles with inflection points within this small linkage envelope. This is not possible with traditional links and allows for increased tunability of suspension behavior.
As can be seen in
In embodiment 1, DIVC[AD][1][2] is not visually established, or in other words it is not a PIVC. DIVC[AD][1][2] can be ultimately solved for using both the known PIVCs (shown in solid lines) in
In several embodiments, IVC migration plots or curves can be plotted graphically by solving for the IVC at each position between the extended and compressed suspension states. A position of the linkage in between the extended and compressed states is known as an intermediate state. The IVC migration curves depend upon the reference frame considered. In most embodiments, the suspended body is considered fixed as the driven wheel moves from the extended to the compressed state. Note that “-M” refers to the migration of an IVC.
As shown in
In various embodiments, mathematical attributes of the IVC migration pathways may be analyzed.
As one example, the curvature of a straight line is defined to be zero since R=∞. Radius R is known as the radius of curvature (RC). Tangent vector (TV) 405 starts at point 400, is perpendicular to radius R 404, and points in the specified direction of curve 401. Point 403 is known as the center of curvature (CC) of curve 401 at point 400. The center of curvature (CC), the radius of curvature (RC), and the tangent vector (TV) may be found at every point along curve 401.
Linear algebra may be used to estimate RC, CC, and k at a point on a curve C. However, other methods of estimation are also contemplated. Using linear algebra, at least three points a, b, and c along a path may be used to define the CC. A circle may be defined that mathematically best fits through the points a, b, and c. It may be noted that this is an approximation since there is a discretization error. The closer together points a, b and c are, the more accurate the RC, CC, and k values will be using this method. It is preferable that points a, b, and c are within a 5% distance of the length of curve C for each increment.
As an example, three different points on curve C may be selected at locations a, b, and c, where a and c are on opposite sides of b. An x,y coordinate can then be determined for both the CC and RC at point b using linear algebra. In this example, the RC magnitude is calculated and the CC (x,y) coordinates are determined. The following equations are representative of this method:
In
Other methods can also be used for quantifying path curvature. For example, as an alternative, calculus may be used to determine curvature k should the equation of curve C be known; however, it is contemplated that the equation of curve C may not be known.
In another example, computer aided design (CAD) tools may be used to plot the DIVC migration curve with great resolution. The number of the divisions into which the suspension travel is divided (i.e., the total number of IVC points created to generate a curve) can be large resulting in more accurate results.
A tool in some CAD software is the ability to display “curvature combs”, curvature inflection points, and minimum radii of a curve or spline. Curvature combs visually display the curvature of a curve or spline, by showing a network of “combs” or lines along the RC direction at a specified density along path C that represent the curvature K. The greater the magnitude of the comb, the greater K. In addition, the side of which the combs reside designate the curvature sign. Therefore, if the combs switch sides, there is an inflection point where K=0 and the curvature comb magnitude is zero.
In
From extended state 48-E to the inflection state 48-I, the cylindrical structure about PIVC [1][4] 41 has rotated clockwise and angle 541-1-A has changed accordingly. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [4][5] 44-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom. From extended state 48-E to the inflection state 48-I, the cylindrical structure about PIVC [1][3] 40 has rotated counter-clockwise and angle 540-1-A has changed accordingly. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [3][5] 43-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom.
From inflection state 48-I to the compressed state 48-C, the cylindrical structure about PIVC [1][4] 41 has rotated counter-clockwise and angle 541-C-A has changed accordingly. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [4][5] 44-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom. From inflection state 48-I to the compressed state 48-C, the cylindrical structure about PIVC [1][3] 40 has rotated clockwise and angle 541-C-A has changed accordingly. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [3][5] 44-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom.
The force to deform the beam structures for virtual PIVC [4][5] 43 and PIVC [4][5] 44 may also be advantageous for suspension performance. Flexure body 3/4/5 may be designed so that the position of beam structures at virtual PIVC [3][5] 43 and PIVC [4][5] 44 are within any position of 43-M or 44-M respectively as shown in
Another advantage of the single flexural body 3/4/5 is that there may be very little flex due to the relatively short migration paths of 43-M and 44-M, and with the ability for the cylindrical structures about virtual PIVC [3][5] 43 and virtual PIVC [4][5] 44. As a result, the internal stresses when the beam structure flexes can be minimized as well as the force on the linkage system as described above. Therefore, the flexure system can closely mimic that of the mechanical linkage version, but with the added weight savings and manufacturability advantages.
Looking at
Separating the combined body into several assembled components has several advantages. First, the parts may be composed of varying materials with varying material properties, each of which may be chosen to optimize the properties such as weight, cost, stiffness, manufacturability, fatigue life, etc. For example, central body 5 may be made from aluminum, which is lightweight and easily machinable. This component does not see cyclic flexural loads as with flexural components 4 and 3. Flexural components 4 and 3 may be made from titanium or composite such as carbon fiber, which has a high or infinite fatigue life ideal for the cyclic bending loads that will occur with these components. Making the entire structure as shown in
Note that combined link body 3/4/5-E with flexural pivots shown in
The spring force due to the bending of flexure body 3/4/5 can be calculated as the resultant force that can move swingarm body 2 from the extended state to the compressed state. This force can vary and can be tuned dependent upon factors such as linkage geometry and material, or other factors. It can also be tuned based on the flexure body 3/4/5 free state position. As an example, consider the case where migration path PIVC[2][5] 45-M is 2.7 mm upwards from 45-E to 45-I, and is 2.7 mm downwards from 45-I to 45-C as shown in
The resultant spring force at rear wheel axis 14 can be calculated in the following way: First, a force that bends flexural body 3 about virtual PIVC [3][5] 43 and flexural body 4 about virtual PIVC [4][5] 44 versus PIVC[2][5] displacement is determined, as shown for example in
Next, the leverage rate of the rear wheel axis migration 14-M of swingarm body 2 versus the migration path PIVC[2][5] 45-M is determined. This leverage rate can be calculated as the ratio of the change in 14-M migration to the change in 45-M migration and can be seen for example in
Next, the force derived in
Tony Foale (Foale, Tony. Motorcycle Handling and Chassis Design the Art and Science. Second Edition. Spain: Tony Foale Designs by Tony Foale, 2002. PDF accessed 2011.) incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, details a simple graphical method to determine anti-squat and anti-rise percentages by using a side view of a belt or chain-driven two-wheel vehicle.
The method described in Tony Foale is used in the analysis shown in
Anti-Squat may be defined as:
Anti-Squat in this example is then equal to:
Anti-Rise may be defined as:
Anti-Rise in this example is then equal to:
Anti-squat and anti-rise may be calculated at all points from the extended state to the compressed state to generate anti-squat and anti-rise curves. These curves are typically plotted as a function of “vertical wheel travel” which is equivalent to the total driven wheel suspension travel distance 511 perpendicular to the ground line 507 in
When the suspended body is loaded with a rider, passenger or cargo the suspension will compress or sag to a desired vertical wheel travel at sag point 615 between the extended and compressed state shown in
The sag percentage is defined as the following:
Anti-squat curve 600 has a smaller driven cog than anti-squat curve 605. Anti-squat curve 600 has a generally stable anti squat value from the extended state 601 and the around sag point 612. Anti-squat curve 600 initially has a positive slope as shown by tangent line 602. Anti-squat curve 600 then has a negative slope at the compressed state 603 as shown by tangent line 604. Anti-squat curve 605 has a generally stable anti squat value from the extended state 606 and the around sag point 613. Anti-squat curve 605 has a negative slope at the extended state 606 as shown by tangent line 607. Anti-squat curve 605 then has a slope at intermediate state 608 that has a negative slope as shown by tangent line 609. Tangent line 609 is more negative than tangent line 607. Anti-squat curve 605 has a negative slope at the compressed state 610 shown by tangent line 611. Tangent line 611 is more negative than tangent line 609. Note that this is one embodiment and many other properties are possible due to the ability to greatly adjust and fine tune with the disclosed linkage layout.
Both anti-squat curve A 600 and anti-squat curve B 605 provide a force opposing the weight transfer force. This results in efficient power transfer during acceleration since energy is not being wasted to compress the shock/damper. There is then a quick drop off around the sag point 612 and 613 to the compressed state 603 and 610. This is beneficial because continuing a similar anti-squat percentage from 601 to 606 is detrimental in this portion of the travel since it would inhibit suspension compression from absorbing impacts.
The leverage rate (LR) is the ratio of the change in vertical wheel travel to the change in shock stroke. A plot can be generated to represent the instantaneous leverage rate from the fully extended to the fully compressed state. The motion ratio (MR) is the inverse of the LR. The higher the leverage rate the greater the mechanical advantage on the shock/damper and the lower the force that compresses the shock. The lower the leverage rate the lesser the mechanical advantage on the shock/damper and the higher the force that compresses the shock.
Note that anti-squat, anti-rise and leverage ratio are typically highly dependent variables in a typical 4-bar linkage or other suspension designs. As a result, the behavior of these three variables is limited with these designs. The disclosed 6-bar linkage allows for greater separation of these variables so that each can be adjusted or optimized as discussed above to improve the ride quality.
Turning now to the figures for embodiment 2, in accordance with various embodiments the suspension system can include a 6-bar linkage.
Note that in all figures, “-E” denotes the extended state, “-I” denotes the inflection state, and “-C” denotes the compressed state. It is possible that other embodiments do not have a state of inflection. For example, swingarm body 1002 can refer to any position between the extended and compressed states, while swingarm body 1002 is labeled as 1002-E in
In
Seven of the total 15 IVCs in the embodiment 2 are PIVCs: PIVC[1001][1003] 1040, PIVC[1001][1004] 1041, PIVC[1001][1006] 1042; PIVC[1003][1005] 1043-E, PIVC[1004][1005] 1044-E, PIVC[1002][1005] 1045-E, and PIVC[1002][1006] 1046-E. Considering the reference frames discussed, the front triangle is assumed to be stationary for suspension analysis. As a result, PIVCs located on the front triangle will be stationary, or SIVCs. Therefore, these PIVCs do not have the notation of “-E”, “-I” or “-C” discussed previously. Examples of these are: PIVC[1001][1003] 1040, PIVC[1001][1004] 1041, and PIVC[1001][1006] 1042.
The smaller envelope of the linkage design, as disclosed herein, has several advantages structurally: There is more clearance between the rear tire and the suspended body, allowing for a shorter distance from the driving cog axis to the driven wheel axis. This can be a performance benefit allowing for quicker turning. The added tire clearance provides more room for dirt and mud that can build up when riding. This added clearance also allows room for a larger “bridge,” tying together the drive and non-drive sides of swingarm body 1002 which aids in torsional stiffness. The added clearance in front of the driving cog axis provides more room to fit a water bottle and other accessories within the frame of suspended body 1001.
The smaller envelope of the linkage design, as disclosed herein, has several advantages kinematically because there is more freedom to locate PIVC[1002][1005] 1045 and therefore a greater ability to tune parameters such as anti-squat, anti-rise, and leverage rate which translates to greater performance. Also, PIVC[1002][1005] 1045 migration paths are able to have an extremely large minimum radius of curvature, or unique curvature profiles with inflection points within this small linkage envelope. This is not possible with traditional links and allows for increased tunability of suspension behavior.
As can be seen in
In embodiment 2, DIVC[AD][1001][1002] is not visually established, or in other words it is not a PIVC. DIVC[AD][1001][1002] can be ultimately solved for using both the known PIVCs (shown in solid lines) in
In several embodiments, IVC migration plots or curves can be plotted graphically by solving for the IVC at each position between the extended and compressed suspension states. A position of the linkage in between the extended and compressed states is known as an intermediate state. The IVC migration curves depend upon the reference frame considered. In most embodiments, the suspended body is considered fixed as the driven wheel moves from the extended to the compressed state. Note that “-M” refers to the migration of an IVC.
As shown in
In
Embodiment 2 has similar anti-squat, anti-rise, and leverage rate properties to that of embodiment 1 and therefore shares similar benefits regarding suspension performance described above.
Note that anti-squat, anti-rise, and leverage ratio are typically highly dependent variables in a typical 4-bar linkage or other suspension designs. As a result, the behavior of these three variables is limited with these designs. The disclosed 6-bar linkage allows for greater separation of these variables so that each can be adjusted or optimized as discussed above to improve the ride quality.
Turning now to the figures for embodiment 3, in accordance with various embodiments the suspension system can include a 6-bar linkage. Note that in all figures, “-E” denotes the extended state, “-I” denotes the inflection state, and “-C” denotes the compressed state. It is possible that other embodiments do not have a state of inflection.
Considering the reference frames discussed, the front triangle is assumed to be stationary for suspension analysis. However, in embodiment 3, PIVC [1][3] 3040-E and PIVC [1][4] 3041-E are now virtual and flex within beam member about PIVC [1][3] 3040-E/PIVC [3][5] 4043-E and PIVC [1][4] 3041-E/PIVC [4][5] 4044-E accordingly. Therefore only PIVC [1][6] 3042 and the structure of front triangle body 3001 will be stationary, or SIVCs. Therefore, these PIVCs do not have the notation of “-E,” “-I,” or “-C” discussed previously, or the PIVC is being discussed at a position other than “-E,” “-I,” or “-C.” An example is PIVC[3001][1006] 1042.
From the extended state to the inflection state, the beam structure representing virtual PIVC [3001][3004] 3041-E/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044-E flexes upwardly to [3001][3004] 3041-I/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044-I. The beam structure representing virtual PIVC [3001][3003] 3040-E/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043-E flexes upwardly to PIVC [3001][3003] 3040-I/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043-I. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [3][5] 44-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom.
From inflection state to the compressed state, the beam structure representing virtual PIVC [3001][3004] 3041-I/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044-I flexes downwardly to [3001][3004] 3041-C/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044-C. The beam structure representing virtual PIVC [3001][3003] 3040-I/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043-I flexes upwardly to PIVC [3001][3003] 3040C/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043-C. The beam structure that flexes as Virtual PIVC [3][5] 44-E has deformed accordingly to allow for a degree of freedom.
The force to deform the beam structures for virtual PIVC [3004][3005] 3043 and PIVC [3004][3005] 3044 may also be advantageous for suspension performance. The integration of suspended body 3001, link body 3003, link body 3004, and link body 3005 may be designed so that the position of beam structures at virtual PIVC [3003][3005] 3043, PIVC [3001][3003] 3040, PIVC [3004][3005] 3044, and PIVC [3001][3004] 3041 are within any position of 3043-M or 3044-M respectively before the body is pivotally mounted to suspended body 3001 at PIVC [3001][3003] 3040 and PIVC [3001][3004] 3041, or in its free state. As a result, the deformation of beam structures at virtual PIVC [3001][3003] 3040/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043 and PIVC [3001][3004] 3041/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044 may apply a force to PIVC [3002][3005] 3045 in either direction of migration path 3045-M depending on design intent. As an example, the free state of integration of suspended body 3001, link body 3003, link body 3004, and link body 3005 may be designed so that a downward force is applied relative to migration path 3045-M of PIVC [3002][3005] 3045 which would inhibit the motion of swingarm body 3002 as it moves from the state of extension to the state of inflection. This may aid in pedaling efficiency by working in tandem with anti-squat forces and the extension of the swingarm to prevent suspension bobbing. In another example the free state of integration of suspended body 3001, link body 3003, link body 3004, and link body 3005 may be designed at the sag position (described above). As a result, the equilibrium of beam flexure forces tends to position the swingarm at the sag position of travel. This may aid in pedaling efficiency by working in tandem with anti-squat forces and the extension of the swingarm, by working in tandem with anti-squat forces and the extension of the swingarm to prevent suspension bobbing. As a final example the integration of suspended body 3001, link body 3003, link body 3004, and link body 3005 may be designed at the mid-point of migration paths 3043-M and 3044-M. As a result, the amount of beam flexure deflection at virtual PIVC [3001][3003] 3040/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043 and PIVC [3001][3004] 3041/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044 would be equal minimizing the flexural force on the linkage system, so that it more similarly represents a non-flexural system, but with the weight savings and manufacturability advantages.
In accordance with various embodiments, the integration of suspended body 3001, link body 3003, link body 3004, and link body 3005 limits the flex required due to the relatively short migration paths of 3043-M and 3044-M, and with the ability for the cylindrical structures about virtual PIVC [3001][3003] 3040/PIVC [3003][3005] 3043 and PIVC [3001][3004] 3041/PIVC [3004][3005] 3044. As a result, the internal stresses when the beam structure flexes can be minimized as well as the force on the linkage system as described above. Therefore, the flexure system can closely mimic that of the mechanical linkage version, but with the added weight savings and manufacturability advantages.
Separating the combined body into separate assembled components has several advantages. First, the parts may be composed of varying materials with varying material properties, each of which may be chosen to optimize the properties such as weight, cost, stiffness, manufacturability, fatigue life, etc. For example, central body 3005 may be made from aluminum which is light weight and easily machinable. This component does not see cyclic flexural loads as with flexural components 553 and 557. Flexural components 3003 and 3004 are integrated into suspended body 3001 and may be made from composite such as carbon fiber which has a high or infinite fatigue life ideal for the cyclic bending loads that will occur with these components. Another advantage of dividing the structure into assembled components is manufacturability. The combined structure of 3001/3003/3004 simplified by omitting 3005. This allows manufacturing of a molded composite part to be greatly simplified.
Note that combined link body 3001/3003/3004-E with flexural pivots assembled to link body 3005-E shown in
Turning now to the figures for embodiment 4, in accordance with various embodiments the suspension system can include a 6-bar linkage.
In current electric bicycle or pedelec designs, PIVCs are not integrated into motor, battery or gearbox housings. Breaking up suspended body 4001 into modular components with PIVCs located on more than one such as gearbox housing 4099 and front triangle structure 4098 has several advantages. First, it allows for better packaging of suspension linkages. If PIVC [1][3] 4040 was required to be part of front triangle structure 4098 rather than gearbox housing 4099, it would be difficult to fit 4-bar linkage 4048-E shown in
Note that this is one possible embodiment and a person of ordinary skill in the art can and will understand other combinations possible in which PIVCs are located on modular bodies that form a rigid suspended body based on the disclosure herein. For example, a PIVC may be integrated into a motor and gearbox that is combined into one unit. These types of motor/gearbox assemblies are commonly used, but currently do not have integrated PIVCs. Another example could be a non-motorized two-wheel vehicle. Here the bottom bracket shell may be a separate modular component front the front triangle structure. In another non-motorized example, the gearbox may be a separate modular component front the front triangle structure but without motor assist. These types of gearbox assemblies are commonly used to replace traditional derailleur shifting systems, but currently do not have integrated PIVCs.
This application is a non-provisional application claiming priority to provisional applications including U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/800,181 titled “Multi-Body Vehicle Suspension Linkage” and filed on Feb. 1, 2019; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/815,675 titled “Multi-Body Vehicle Suspension Linkage” filed on Mar. 8, 2019; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/833,496 titled “Multi-Body Vehicle Suspension Linkage” filed on Apr. 12, 2019; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/867,169 titled, “Modular Multi-body Vehicle Suspension Linkage” filed on Jun. 26, 2019; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/894,469 titled, “Multi-body Vehicle Suspension Linkage” filed on Aug. 30, 2019; each of which are incorporated herein by reference in its respective entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
421748 | McErlain | Feb 1890 | A |
519855 | Whitaker | May 1894 | A |
591306 | Tolson | Oct 1897 | A |
630232 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1899 | A |
712784 | Ellis | Nov 1902 | A |
724871 | Hunter | Apr 1903 | A |
944795 | Leet et al. | Dec 1909 | A |
1043269 | Stephenson | Nov 1912 | A |
1068583 | Harley | Jul 1913 | A |
1168702 | Babis, Jr. | Jan 1916 | A |
1220606 | Chelstrom | Mar 1917 | A |
1261440 | Rigby | Apr 1918 | A |
1283030 | Ashton | Oct 1918 | A |
1369356 | Rigby | Feb 1921 | A |
2173520 | Klatt | Sep 1939 | A |
3803933 | Huret | Apr 1974 | A |
3813955 | Huret | Jun 1974 | A |
3847028 | Bergles | Nov 1974 | A |
3917313 | Smith | Nov 1975 | A |
3977697 | MacPike | Aug 1976 | A |
4058181 | Buell | Nov 1977 | A |
4076271 | Doncque | Feb 1978 | A |
4114918 | Lutz | Sep 1978 | A |
4241617 | Nagano | Dec 1980 | A |
4265329 | de Cortanze | May 1981 | A |
4279172 | Nagano | Jul 1981 | A |
4322088 | Miyakoshi | Mar 1982 | A |
4360214 | Isono | Nov 1982 | A |
4408674 | Boyesen | Oct 1983 | A |
4410196 | Ribi | Oct 1983 | A |
4415057 | Yamaguchi | Nov 1983 | A |
4429760 | Koizumi | Feb 1984 | A |
4433747 | Offenstadt | Feb 1984 | A |
4463824 | Boyesen | Aug 1984 | A |
4463964 | Takayanagi | Aug 1984 | A |
4485885 | Fukuchi | Dec 1984 | A |
4500302 | Crepin | Feb 1985 | A |
4506755 | Tsuchida et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4540193 | Noda et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4544044 | Boyesen | Oct 1985 | A |
RE32059 | Nagano | Dec 1985 | E |
4558761 | Boyesen | Dec 1985 | A |
4561519 | Omori | Dec 1985 | A |
4574909 | Ribi | Mar 1986 | A |
4582343 | Waugh | Apr 1986 | A |
4586913 | Nagano | May 1986 | A |
4596302 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4619633 | Nagano | Oct 1986 | A |
4621706 | Boyesen | Nov 1986 | A |
4671525 | Ribi | Jun 1987 | A |
4673053 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4679811 | Shuler | Jul 1987 | A |
4702338 | Trema | Oct 1987 | A |
4735277 | Prince | Apr 1988 | A |
4744434 | Miyakoshi et al. | May 1988 | A |
4789042 | Pitts | Dec 1988 | A |
4789174 | Lawwill | Dec 1988 | A |
RE32924 | Nagano | May 1989 | E |
4830391 | Silk | May 1989 | A |
4878884 | Romano | Nov 1989 | A |
4951791 | Belil Creixell | Aug 1990 | A |
5011459 | Van De Vel | Apr 1991 | A |
5121937 | Lawwill | Jun 1992 | A |
5205572 | Buell et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5226674 | Buell et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244224 | Busby | Sep 1993 | A |
5259637 | Busby | Nov 1993 | A |
5282517 | Prince | Feb 1994 | A |
5295702 | Buell | Mar 1994 | A |
5299820 | Lawwill | Apr 1994 | A |
5306036 | Busby | Apr 1994 | A |
5332246 | Buell | Jul 1994 | A |
5335929 | Takagaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354085 | Gally | Oct 1994 | A |
5356165 | Kulhawik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360078 | Rifenburg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370411 | Takamiya et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5409248 | Williams | Apr 1995 | A |
5409249 | Busby | Apr 1995 | A |
5417445 | Smart | May 1995 | A |
5429380 | Lawwill | Jul 1995 | A |
5435584 | Buell | Jul 1995 | A |
5441292 | Busby | Aug 1995 | A |
5452910 | Harris | Sep 1995 | A |
5474318 | Castellano | Dec 1995 | A |
5498013 | Hwang | Mar 1996 | A |
5509679 | Leitner | Apr 1996 | A |
5553881 | Klassen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570896 | Collins | Nov 1996 | A |
5597366 | Ozaki | Jan 1997 | A |
5607367 | Patterson | Mar 1997 | A |
5611557 | Farris et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628524 | Klassen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658001 | Blanchard | Aug 1997 | A |
5678837 | Leitner | Oct 1997 | A |
5688200 | White | Nov 1997 | A |
5772228 | Owyang | Jun 1998 | A |
5791674 | D'Aluisio et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816966 | Yang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826899 | Klein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5899480 | Leitner | May 1999 | A |
5957473 | Lawwill | Sep 1999 | A |
6012999 | Patterson | Jan 2000 | A |
6076845 | Lawwill et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086080 | Scheffer | Jul 2000 | A |
6102421 | Lawwill et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131934 | Sinclair | Oct 2000 | A |
6203042 | Wilcox | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206397 | Klassen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244610 | Kramer-Massow | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6406048 | Castellano | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6439593 | Tseng | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450520 | Girard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488301 | Klassen et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6543799 | Miyoshi | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6629903 | Kondo | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6712374 | Assier | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6793230 | Cheng | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6843494 | Lam | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845998 | Probst | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6871867 | Parigian | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877591 | Hso | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886846 | Carroll | May 2005 | B2 |
6902504 | Fukuda | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926298 | Ellsworth et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955373 | Chang | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969081 | Whyte | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7025698 | Wickliffe | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048292 | Weagle | May 2006 | B2 |
7066481 | Soucek | Jun 2006 | B1 |
RE39159 | Klassen | Jul 2006 | E |
7097190 | Matsumoto | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100930 | Saiki | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104908 | Nagano | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128329 | Weagle | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131511 | Arnold | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7210695 | Griffiths | May 2007 | B2 |
7216883 | Oconnor | May 2007 | B2 |
7296815 | Ellsworth | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7350797 | Carroll | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377535 | Chamberlain | May 2008 | B2 |
7392999 | Oconnor | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7395892 | Alonzo | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7413208 | Weng | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427077 | Lesage et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7467803 | Buckley | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7494146 | Tseng | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7556276 | Dunlap | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7581743 | Graney | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7635141 | Oconnor | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658394 | Huang | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7677347 | Brawn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703785 | Colegrove et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703788 | Tanouye et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712757 | Berthold | May 2010 | B2 |
7717212 | Weagle | May 2010 | B2 |
7722072 | Hoogendoorn | May 2010 | B2 |
7722488 | Kunisawa et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7766135 | Fox | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784810 | Graney | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806422 | I | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815207 | Currie | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828314 | Weagle | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837213 | Colegrove et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837214 | Tribotte | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7891688 | Chamberlain | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7909347 | Earle | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914407 | Fukushima et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7934739 | Domahidy | May 2011 | B2 |
7938424 | Arraiz | May 2011 | B2 |
7938425 | Chamberlain | May 2011 | B2 |
7954837 | Talavasek | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963541 | Chamberlain | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971892 | Sasnowski et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7980579 | Buckley | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002301 | Weagle | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006993 | Chamberlain | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8007383 | Watarai et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012052 | Shahana | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8033558 | Earle | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8066297 | Beale et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075009 | Cocalis | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8136829 | Kang et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8152191 | Huang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8201841 | Beale et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8272657 | Graney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272658 | Hoogendoorn | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286982 | Plantet et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303443 | Wickliffe et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8348295 | Beaulieu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376382 | Twers | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382136 | Beale et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8419573 | Yamaguchi | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430415 | Earle et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8434776 | Wuthrich | May 2013 | B2 |
8439383 | Talavasek | May 2013 | B2 |
8459680 | Chamberlain | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8585070 | Beale | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590914 | Domahidy | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8622411 | Chamberlain | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8641072 | Graney et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646797 | Buckley | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8678962 | Jordan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8696008 | Hoogendoorn | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8727057 | Park et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8733774 | Graney et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8770360 | Fox | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8833785 | Wagner | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8851498 | Alsop | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8882127 | Colegrove et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8919799 | Wimmer | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8931793 | Klieber | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8932162 | Emura et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8998235 | Beale | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9039026 | Hudec | May 2015 | B2 |
9056644 | Hudák | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9056647 | Hu | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9061729 | Canfield et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9102378 | Zawistowski | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9102379 | Capogna | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9127766 | Kuwayama et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145185 | Claro | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156521 | Lumpkin | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168977 | McLeay | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9216791 | Hudec | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9221513 | Hoogendoorn | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9242693 | Voss | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9302732 | Beale | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327792 | Johnson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9334011 | Chamberlain | May 2016 | B2 |
9376156 | Chamberlain | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9376162 | Colegrove et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9457871 | Kuwayama et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9469369 | Thoma | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9505462 | Pasqua et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9561834 | Zawistowski | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9598131 | Zusy et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9598140 | Berthold | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9637199 | Pasqua et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9676446 | Pasqua et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9758217 | Bortoli et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9821879 | Hoogendoorn et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9908583 | Matheson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9919765 | Wickliffe et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9988122 | Pedretti | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10011318 | Beale | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10099739 | Nishikawa | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10160512 | Beale | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10336398 | Hudec | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10343742 | Zawistowski | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10363988 | Buckley | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10640169 | Pedretti | May 2020 | B2 |
10703433 | Lauer | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10926830 | Zawistowski | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11052964 | Wallace | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20010024024 | Klassen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030038450 | Lam | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030090082 | Ellsworth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030160421 | Assier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193163 | Chamberlain | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193164 | Parigian | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040046355 | Carroll | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061305 | Christini | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040239071 | Chamberlain et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050057018 | Saiki | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067809 | Chamberlain | Mar 2005 | A2 |
20050067810 | Weagle | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050184483 | Buckley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050253357 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285367 | Chang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022428 | Whyte | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060061059 | Lesage et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071442 | Hoogendoorn | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060119070 | Weagle | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060181053 | Huang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197306 | Oconnor | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060225942 | Weagle | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231360 | Chen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024022 | Weagle | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070108725 | Graney | May 2007 | A1 |
20070194550 | Wadelton | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210555 | Oconnor | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080054595 | Lu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080067772 | Weagle | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080217882 | Beaulieu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238030 | Tseng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238031 | Tseng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252040 | Colegrove et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258427 | Buckley | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080303242 | Oconnor | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001685 | Talavasek et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026728 | Domahidy | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090072512 | Earle | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090250897 | Tanouye et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261556 | Beale et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261557 | Beale | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278331 | Graney | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283986 | Falke | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322055 | Arraiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100059965 | Earle | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102531 | Graney et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109282 | Weagle | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127473 | Cocalis et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156066 | Oconnor | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100327553 | Talavasek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327554 | Talavasek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327556 | Chamberlain | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025015 | Colegrove et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110115181 | Weagle | May 2011 | A1 |
20110140387 | Andal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175310 | Lewis | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187078 | Higgon | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110233892 | Domahidy | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110233893 | Buckley | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110275256 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285106 | Talavasek | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120223504 | Antonot | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120228850 | Tseng | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120280470 | Colegrove et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299268 | Chamberlain et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130001918 | Graney et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130001919 | Graney et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130093160 | Alsop | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096781 | Reichenbach et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130214503 | Chiuppani | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249181 | Becker et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130249188 | Beale | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130285346 | Wimmer | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140001729 | Hudec | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015220 | Talavasek | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042726 | Canfield | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140060950 | Beutner | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140109728 | Mcrorie, III | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140167385 | Gogo et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140217697 | Buckley | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140318306 | Tetsuka | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150001829 | Berthold | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035241 | McLeay | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150054250 | Hu | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150115569 | Matheson et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150175238 | Lumpkin | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150183487 | Tsai | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150191213 | Beale | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150251724 | Hudec | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150360743 | Oconnor | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160083042 | Voss | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160257371 | Droux | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160272273 | Colegrove et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160280317 | Hoogendoorn | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160311493 | Scheffer | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160375956 | Talavasek | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170101152 | Pedretti | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170151996 | Southall | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180037295 | Beale | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180072378 | Talavasek | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180072379 | Talavasek | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180072380 | Talavasek | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180140387 | Richard | May 2018 | A1 |
20180148123 | Neilson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180229798 | Hoogendoorn et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180265165 | Zawistowski | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180297661 | Beale | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190039682 | Zawistowski | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190144069 | Beale | May 2019 | A1 |
20190300096 | Chamberlain et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190300097 | Chamberlain | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200070930 | Buckley | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20210046996 | Beale | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210269117 | Zawistowski | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220153381 | Zawistowski | May 2022 | A1 |
20220306240 | Talavasek | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2293366 | Dec 1998 | CA |
2980086 | Jun 2005 | CA |
692011 | Jun 1940 | DE |
9405076 | May 1994 | DE |
9416803 | Dec 1994 | DE |
4435482 | Apr 1996 | DE |
102019002456 | Oct 2019 | DE |
102021104753 | Sep 2021 | DE |
0422324 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0723907 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0941917 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1026073 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1060979 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1238900 | Sep 2002 | EP |
2540609 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2706002 | Mar 2014 | EP |
1799534 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2812234 | Dec 2014 | EP |
541520 | Jul 1922 | FR |
933079 | Apr 1948 | FR |
2774966 | Aug 1999 | FR |
17336 | Oct 1913 | GB |
2086319 | May 1982 | GB |
2338216 | Dec 1999 | GB |
2522461 | Jul 2015 | GB |
2525870 | Jan 2017 | GB |
2590808 | Jul 2022 | GB |
2594780 | Jul 2022 | GB |
H0725378 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2027223 | Feb 2022 | NL |
9422710 | Oct 1994 | WO |
9803390 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9818671 | May 1998 | WO |
9856645 | Dec 1998 | WO |
199944880 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9965760 | Dec 1999 | WO |
9944880 | Jan 2000 | WO |
03010042 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03018392 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03021129 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2004045940 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005030564 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005030565 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005090149 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006005687 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006032052 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006061052 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2008025950 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008130336 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009121936 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010033174 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010103057 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010121267 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2012024697 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012027900 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012063098 | May 2012 | WO |
2012122634 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013028138 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013078436 | May 2013 | WO |
2013119616 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013142855 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013192622 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014009019 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014029759 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014202890 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015004490 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015196242 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016036237 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016097433 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016134471 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2018027192 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018170505 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2019010394 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2021133996 | Jul 2021 | WO |
2021174088 | Sep 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” mailed Jul. 22, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,165, 15 pages. |
Netherlands Intellectual Property Office, “Search Report and Opinion,” issued Nov. 15, 2021, for Dutch Application No. 2027668, in Dutch with some English translations, 24 pages. |
EPO, “Extended European Search Report for EP 18768549.0”, mailed Feb. 8, 2021. |
“Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, mailed by U.K. Intellectual Property Office on Aug. 25, 2021, for U.K. Application No. GB2102854.3, 8 pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion”, mailed on Jul. 16, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/020034, 16 pages. |
“Netherlands Patent Office, Written Opinion and Search Report mailed Sep. 24, 2021”, in Dutch and English, for Netherlands Application No. 2027223, 17 pages. |
“U.K. Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 an 18(3),””, mailed Apr. 21, 2021, for U.K. Application No. GB2020235.4, 6 pages. |
Worsey, “Forbidden Druid Review—Are high pivots just for downhill?”, Enduro, [online], Mar. 4, 2019 [retrieved on Jun. 16, 2021], From Internet: <url: https://enduro-mtb.com/en/fobidden-druid-review/>; 15 pages. |
“International Search Report mailed Jun. 19, 2020, in PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/016265, 18 pages”. |
Aston, Paul, “Canyon Sender—Review”, https://www.pinkbike.com/news/canyon-sender-review-2017.html, Mar. 13, 2017, 33 pages. |
Aston, Paul, “Robot Bike Co R160—First Look”, https://www.pinkbike.com/news/robot-bike-co-r160-first-look-2016.html (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), May 27, 2016, 39 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Sarrus Linkage”, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarrus_linkage, 1 page, at least as early as Aug. 20, 2010. |
Chen, “Design of Structural Mechanisms”, A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Engineering Science at the University of Oxford, St Hugh's College, 2003, 160 Pages. |
Cunningham, Richard , “First Look: Felt 2014”, https://www.pinkbike.com/news/First-Look-Felt-2014.html (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), Aug. 7, 2013, 20 pages. |
DB Bikes, “Felt Compulsion 50 Mountain Bike 2017”, https://downhillbikesforsale.com/products/Felt-Compulsion-50-Mountain-Bike-2017.html, (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), 9 pages. |
EP, “European Extended Search Report”, Application No. 12851566.5, May 28, 2015, 7 pages. |
EP, “Extended European Search Report”, Application No. 11818903.4, Sep. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
EP, “Supplementary Search Report”, Application No. 05798319.9, Dec. 11, 2009, 1 page. |
Foale, Tony, “Motorcycle Handling and Chassis Design: The Art and Science”, https://epdf.pub/motorcycle-handling-and-chassis-design-the-art-and-science.html, Mar. 2002, 498 pages. |
Giant Bicycles, “Anthem Advanced Pro 29 1”, https://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/anthem-advanced-pro-29-1-2021, (Accessed Sep. 14, 2020), 8 pages. |
Kavik Bicycles, “Kavik Regen Suspension”, (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), 2 pages. |
Li, “Movable Spatial 6R Linkages”, XP055249075, Retrieved from the Internet on Oct. 13, 2016: URL:http://people.ricam.oeaw.ac.at/z.li/pu blications/talks/6.pdf, Oct. 2, 2013, 48 Pages. |
Mountain Bike Action, “Bike Test: Felt Compulsion 1 27.5”, https://mbaction.com/oct-felt-compulsion-1-27-5/, (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), 10 pages. |
Overholt, Zach, Bikerumor, “IB17: Tantrum Cycles makes it to production, gets noticed by Adventure Capitalists”, https://bikerumor.com/2017/09/26/ib17-tantrum-cycles-makes-it-to-production-gets-noticed-by-adventure-capitalists/ (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), Sep. 26, 2017, 8 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2011/048696, Dec. 14, 2011, 10 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/065090, Feb. 12, 2016, 11 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2012/066427, Jan. 18, 2013, 12 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2018/041054, Sep. 28, 2018, 12 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2018/023124, Aug. 2, 2018, 14 pages. |
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2005/33410, Nov. 29, 2006, 5 pages. |
Ridemonkey, “how many links could a dw link if a dw could link links?”, https://ridemonkey.bikemag.com/threads/how-many-links-could-a-dw-link-if-a-dw-could-link-links.276645/ (Accessed Jun. 30, 2020), May 27, 2016, 8 pages. |
Roberts, Dan, “First Ride: 2021 Canyon Sender CFR”, https://www.pinkbike.com/news/first-ride-2021-canyon-sender-cfr.html, Aug. 11, 2020, 23 pages. |
Sarrut, “Note Sur La Transformation Des Mouvements Rectilignes Alternatifs”, Académie des Sciences, 36, 1036-1038, 1853, 5 Pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “U.S. Appl. No. 62/815,675”, filed Mar. 8, 2019, Mar. 8, 2019. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “U.S. Appl. No. 62/833,496”, filed Apr. 12, 2019, Apr. 12, 2019. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “U.S. Appl. No. 62/867,169”, filed Jun. 26, 2019, Jun. 26, 2019. |
Zawistowski, Think Turquoise, http://www.yeticycles.com/blog/?p=237 [Retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 27, 2011], Jul. 18, 2010,. |
Zawistowski, “Quantifying Wheel Path”, Think Turquoise, http://www.yeticycles.com/blog/?p=237 [Retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 27, 2011], Jul. 18, 2010, 4 Pages. |
GB IPO, “Combined Search and Exam Report”, App. No. 2020235.4, Apr. 21, 2021, 6 pages. |
MTBR: Mountain Bike Review Forum, “Jayem Discussion Starter #1—Knolly Suing Intense for Building Bikes with Seat-tubes in Front of the BB”, https://www.mtbr.com/threads/knolly-suing-intense-for-building-bikes-with-seat-tubes-in-front-of-the-bb.1173867/, Jan. 2021, 16 pages. |
European Patent Office, EP Extended Search Report, mailed Sep. 21, 2022, for European Application No. 20747607.8, 2 pages. |
Smurthwaite, Pinkbike Outside! publication, “Spotted: A New Commencal Supreme Breaks Cover at the Portugal Cup”, Article published on Mar. 7, 2022. |
Roberts, Pinkbike Outside! publication, “What's Going on With Commencal's Prototype DH Race Bike?”, Article published on Jun. 9, 2021. |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, mailed Jul. 8, 2022, for European Application No. 18768549.0, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, mailed Oct. 4, 2022, for European Application No. 20747607.8, 6 pages. |
German Patent Office, Examination Notice and Search Report, mailed Apr. 13, 2022, for German Application No. 10 2020 134 843.6, 7 pages. |
U.K. Intellectual Property Office, Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2022, for U.K. Application No. GB2208682.1, 3 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 16, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/705,049, 10 pages. |
Brown, “Preview: Nicolai Bikes Available in the U.S. the belt-drive, big-hit bikes will be distributed by Nicolai USA,” BIKE Mag, Jun. 3, 2014, 9 pages. |
Overholt, “SOC 14: Effigear Calls in the Cavalerie for new Gear Box Bikes in the US,” Bike Rumor, Apr. 23, 2014, 16 pages. |
Nicolai Maschinenbau, “History of Nicolai,” Gesellschaft für Zweirad und Maschinenbau mbh, at least as early as 1995, 3 pages. |
Nicolai, “Nicolai Trombone Frame,” at least as early as 1995, 6 pages. |
Netherlands Patent Office, “Written Opinion and Search Report,” mailed Feb. 22, 2023, for Dutch Application No. 2029897, Dutch with partial English translation, 12 pages. |
Aston, “Robot Bike Co R160 Custom—Review,” Outside Magazine, Oct. 17, 2016, 46 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200247500 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62894469 | Aug 2019 | US | |
62867169 | Jun 2019 | US | |
62833496 | Apr 2019 | US | |
62815675 | Mar 2019 | US | |
62800181 | Feb 2019 | US |