Multi-camera system using folded optics

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9398264
  • Patent Number
    9,398,264
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 15, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Described herein are methods and devices that employ a plurality of image sensors to capture a target image of a scene. As described, positioning at least one reflective or refractive surface near the plurality of image sensors enables the sensors to capture together an image of wider field of view and longer focal length than any sensor could capture individually by using the reflective or refractive surface to guide a portion of the image scene to each sensor. The different portions of the scene captured by the sensors may overlap, and may be aligned and cropped to generate the target image.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to imaging systems and methods that include a multi-camera array. In particular, the disclosure relates to systems and methods that enable low-profile imaging systems and mobile devices while maintaining or improving image quality.


BACKGROUND

Many mobile devices, such as mobile phones and tablet computing devices, include cameras that may be operated by a user to capture still and/or video images. Because the mobile devices are typically designed to be relatively small, it can be important to design the cameras or imaging systems to be as thin as possible in order to maintain a low-profile mobile device. In various conventional devices, the thickness of the mobile device is maintained as small as possible by turning the imaging sensor on its side and using reflective devices to bend the rays to the sensor. However, this particular solution is not very robust because the width of the imaging sensor and the pixel pitch may determine the highest resolution of the camera.


In other conventional devices, the thickness of the mobile device is maintained as small as possible by shortening the focal length of the imaging system. However, various problems can arise when the focal length of the system is designed to be as short as possible. For example, because the focal length and the field of view of the system are inversely related, shortening the focal length may increase the field of view to such an extent that the image may cross over from a natural image to an unnatural wide field of view image, e.g., at fields of view of about 60 degrees or greater. Furthermore, lens roll-off, e.g., the loss of light or brightness near the edges of an image as compared with the center of an image, may increase as focal length decreases. Thus, as the focal length of imaging systems in mobile devices is reduced, image quality may degrade due to undesirable lens roll-off.


In addition, the modulation transfer function (MTF) of imaging systems in various mobile devices may produce lower resolution near the edges of the image as compared to the center of the image, which may be referred to as MTF roll-off. Because MTF roll-off may also be inversely related to focal length, a reduced focal length in mobile devices may reduce the resolution at the edges of the image. Moreover, shorter focal lengths may increase the angle of incidence of the lens' chief ray, which can also generate undesirable artifacts, including increased light and electrical crosstalk between pixels and a lower sensor MTF performance. Accordingly, it can be advantageous to reduce the thickness of imaging systems in mobile devices, while maintaining or improving image quality.


SUMMARY

The folded optic sensor arrays and image capture techniques described herein allow for the creation of low-profile image capture devices without shortening the focal length or decreasing the resolution of the image across the sensor array's field of view. By redirecting light toward each sensor in the array using a primary and secondary surface, and by positioning the lens assemblies used to focus the incoming light between the primary and secondary surfaces, the sensor array may be positioned on a flat substrate perpendicular to the lens assemblies. The longer focal length makes it possible to implement features such as optical zoom and to incorporate more complicated optics that require more space than commonly afforded by the traditional mobile camera, such as adding more optical elements. Camera acuity, which refers to the camera's angular resolution and it defines how well the camera resolves far away objects, is proportional to focal length and thus directly benefits from longer cameras.


Some of the embodiments may employ a central mirror, for example with multiple surfaces, to split incoming light comprising the target image into multiple portions for capture by the sensors in the array. Other embodiments may employ a prism with multiple facets, wherein each facet directs a portion of the light comprising the target image toward a sensor in the array. Each portion of the split light may be passed through a lens assembly and reflected off of a surface positioned directly above or below a sensor, such that each sensor captures a portion of the image. In some circumstances, each sensor in the array may capture a portion of the image which overlaps slightly with the portions captured by neighboring sensors in the array, and these portions may be assembled into the target image, for example by image stitching techniques.


According to one embodiment, an image capture system comprises a plurality of image sensors, each of the plurality of image sensors having one of a plurality of fields of view, each of the plurality of fields of view comprising a substantially different portion of the scene; a plurality of lens assemblies, each lens assembly corresponding to one of the plurality of image sensors; a primary surface positioned so as to direct light comprising at least a portion of the scene through at least one of the plurality of lens assemblies; a plurality of secondary surfaces, wherein each of the secondary surfaces directs at least a portion of the light from one of the plurality of lens assemblies into one of the plurality of image sensors, and wherein each of the plurality of image sensors captures one of a plurality of partial images, each of the plurality of partial images corresponding to one of the plurality of fields of view; and a processing module configured to assemble the plurality of partial images into the target image.


The image capture system may further comprise a substantially flat substrate. The plurality of image sensors, plurality of lens assemblies, primary surface and secondary surfaces may be mounted on the substrate in a variety of suitable configurations. The primary surface may comprise one or more reflective surface, and in some embodiments may be a prism comprising one or more facets configured to redirect incoming light comprising the target image scene.


According to another embodiment, a method is provided for capturing a target image scene, the method comprising the steps of providing plurality of image sensors, each of the plurality of image sensors having one of a plurality of fields of view, each of the plurality of fields of view comprising a substantially different portion of the scene; providing a plurality of lens assemblies, each lens assembly corresponding to one of the plurality of image sensors; directing light comprising at least a portion of the scene toward each of the plurality of lens assemblies using at least one primary surface; directing the light from each of the plurality of lens assemblies toward a corresponding one of the plurality of image sensors using a plurality of secondary surfaces; capturing a plurality of partial images, wherein each of the plurality of partial images is captured by one of the plurality of image sensors and corresponds to one of the plurality of fields of view; and assembling the plurality of partial images into the target image.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various aspects of image capture are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1A illustrates a cross-sectional side view of an embodiment of a folded optic sensor assembly;



FIG. 1B illustrates an top view of an embodiment of projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor assembly of FIG. 1A;



FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of an image capture device;



FIG. 3A illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a folded optic sensor array;



FIG. 3B illustrates perspective view of an embodiment of the folded optic sensor array of FIG. 3A;



FIG. 3C illustrates an schematic diagram of one embodiment of projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor array of FIGS. 3A-B;



FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional side view of one embodiment of a folded optic sensor assembly showing the angular relationship of its components;



FIG. 5A illustrates a perspective view of another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array;



FIG. 5B illustrates a perspective view of yet another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array;



FIG. 5C illustrates a schematic diagram of an embodiment of projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor arrays of FIGS. 5A-B;



FIG. 6A illustrates a perspective view of another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array;



FIG. 6B illustrates a schematic diagram of an embodiment of projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor array of FIG. 6A;



FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a cascaded folded optic sensor array;



FIG. 8 illustrates a cross-sectional side view of another embodiment of a folded optic sensor assembly; and



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a folded optic image capture process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Implementations disclosed herein provide systems, methods and apparatus for mobile imaging applications. For example, as explained herein, it can be desirable to reduce the form factor of mobile devices while maintaining or improving image quality. The implementations disclosed herein can be used in mobile devices to reduce the thickness of imaging systems by employing multiple imaging sensors and/or multiple lenses across the field of view of the imaging system. In various implementations, an array of cameras and/or imaging sensors may be provided adjacent one or more reflective surfaces. The array of sensors can capture multiple, overlapping images, which can be stitched together to form a single image while maintaining high image quality and resolution. By spacing multiple sensors laterally on a substrate, or otherwise adjacent one another in the system, the overall height or thickness of the imaging system can be reduced. In various implementations, the disclosed systems may be so-called folded optical systems that include relatively long optical path lengths. By not reducing the focal length in a substantial way, the reductions in image quality described above can be avoided, while still maintaining an imaging system with a reduced height.


It should be appreciated that many other implementations of the disclosed concepts are possible. Various advantages can be achieved with the disclosed implementations. For example, the overall thickness of the mobile device, including the imaging system, can be reduced compared with conventional imaging systems used in mobile devices. Further, the resolution of the image across the sensor array's field of view can be improved and can avoid the roll-off in resolution found in traditional cameras (e.g., where resolution may decrease at the edges). Further, the use of multiple lenses across the field of view of the system can increase the total effective resolution across the entire field of view. In addition, the use of multiple lenses may increase the focal length of the camera and thus increase the camera's acuity.


In various arrangements, the field of view of each camera may overlap to achieve specific purposes, such as enabling the ability to adjust the focus after post-processing. Furthermore, high dynamic range cameras can be implemented to capture two simultaneous images and then merge them together. In addition, an autofocus application can be implemented by changing the focal length between the lens and the sensor of each camera in the array. As explained herein, various other advantages and implementations can be achieved.


One skilled in the art will recognize that these embodiments may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.


In the following description, specific details are given to provide a thorough understanding of the examples. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the examples may be practiced without these specific details. For example, electrical components/devices may be shown in block diagrams in order not to obscure the examples in unnecessary detail. In other instances, such components, other structures and techniques may be shown in detail to further explain the examples.


It is also noted that the examples may be described as a process, which is depicted as a flowchart, a flow diagram, a finite state diagram, a structure diagram, or a block diagram. Although a flowchart may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel, or concurrently, and the process can be repeated. In addition, the order of the operations may be re-arranged. A process is terminated when its operations are completed. A process may correspond to a method, a function, a procedure, a subroutine, a subprogram, etc. When a process corresponds to a software function, its termination corresponds to a return of the function to the calling function or the main function.


Referring now to FIGS. 1A-B, an exemplary folded optics multi-sensor assembly 100 will now be described in greater detail. As show in FIG. 1A, a sensor assembly 100 may include image sensors 105, 125, reflective surfaces 110, 135, lens assemblies 115, 130, a central reflective surface 120 all mounted to a substrate 150.


The image sensors 105, 125 may comprise, in certain embodiments, a charge-coupled device (CCD), complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor (CMOS), or any other image sensing device that receives light and generates image data in response to the received image. Image sensors 105, 125 may be able to obtain image data of still photographs and may also provide information regarding motion in a captured video stream. Sensors 105 and 125 may be individual sensors or may represent arrays of sensors, such as a 3×1 array. However, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, any suitable array of sensors may be used in the disclosed implementations.


The sensors 105, 125 may be mounted on the substrate 150 as shown in FIG. 1A. In some embodiments, all sensors may be on one plane by being mounted to the flat substrate 150. Substrate 150 may be any suitable substantially flat material. The central reflective surface 120 and lens assemblies 115, 130 may be mounted on the substrate 150 as well. Multiple configurations are possible for mounting a sensor array or arrays, a plurality of lens assemblies, and a plurality of primary and secondary reflective or refractive surfaces.


In some embodiments, a central reflective surface 120 may be used to redirect light from a target image scene toward the sensors 105, 125. Central reflective surface 120 may be a mirror or a plurality of mirrors, and may be flat or shaped as needed to properly redirect incoming light to the image sensors 105, 125. For example, in some embodiments, central reflective surface 120 may be a mirror sized and shaped to reflect incoming light rays through the lens assemblies 115, 130 to sensors 105, 125. The central reflective surface 120 may split light comprising the target image into multiple portions and direct each portion at a different sensor. For example, a first side 122 of the central reflective surface 120 may send a portion of the light corresponding to a first field of view 140 toward the left sensor 105 while a second side 124 sends a second portion of the light corresponding to a second field of view 145 toward the right sensor 125. It should be appreciated that together the fields of view 140, 145 of the image sensors cover at least the target image.


In some embodiments in which the receiving sensors are each an array of a plurality of sensors, the central reflective surface may be made of multiple reflective surfaces angled relative to one another in order to send a different portion of the target image scene toward each of the sensors. Each sensor in the array may have a substantially different field of view, and in some embodiments the fields of view may overlap. Certain embodiments of the central reflective surface may have complicated non-planar surfaces to increase the degrees of freedom when designing the lens system. Further, although the central surface is discussed as being a reflective surface, in other embodiments central surface may be refractive. For example, central surface may be a prism configured with a plurality of facets, where each facet directs a portion of the light comprising the scene toward one of the sensors.


After being reflected off the central reflective surface 120, the light may be passed through lens assemblies 115, 130. One or more lens assemblies 115, 130 may be provided between the central reflective surface 120 and the sensors 105, 125 and reflective surfaces 110, 135. The lens assemblies 115, 130 may be used to focus the portion of the target image which is directed toward each sensor.


In some embodiments, each lens assembly may comprise one or more lenses and an actuator for moving the lens among a plurality of different lens positions through a housing. The actuator may be a voice coil motor (VCM), micro-electronic mechanical system (MEMS), or a shape memory alloy (SMA). The lens assembly may further comprise a lens driver for controlling the actuator.


Traditional auto focus techniques may be implemented by changing the focal length between the lens 115, 130 and corresponding sensor 105, 125 of each sensor assembly. In some embodiments, this may be accomplished by moving a lens barrel. Other embodiments may adjust the focus by moving the central mirror up or down or by adjusting the angle of the mirror relative to the lens assembly. Certain embodiments may adjust the focus by moving the side mirrors over each sensor. Such embodiments may allow the assembly to adjust the focus of each sensor individually. Further, it is possible for some embodiments to change the focus of the entire assembly at once, for example by placing a lens like a liquid lens over the entire assembly. In certain implementations, computational photography may be used to change the focal point of the camera array.


Multiple side reflective surfaces, such as reflective surfaces 110 and 135, can be provided around the central mirror 120 opposite the sensors. After passing through the lens assemblies, the side reflective surfaces 110, 135 can reflect the light downward onto the flat sensors 105, 125. As depicted, sensor 105 may be positioned beneath reflective surface 110 and sensor 125 may be positioned beneath reflective surface 135. However, in other embodiments, the sensors may be above the side reflected surfaces, and the side reflective surfaces may be configured to reflect light upward. Other suitable configurations of the side reflective surfaces and the sensors are possible in which the light from each lens assembly is redirected toward the sensors. Certain embodiments may enable movement of the side reflective surfaces 110, 135 to change the focus or field of view of the associated sensor.


As shown in FIG. 1B, each sensor's field of view 140, 145 may be steered into the object space by the surface of the central mirror 120 associated with that sensor. Mechanical methods may be employed to tilt the mirrors and/or move the prisms in the array so that the field of view of each camera can be steered to different locations on the object field. This may be used, for example, to implement a high dynamic range camera, to increase the resolution of the camera system, or to implement a plenoptics camera system. Each sensor's (or each 3×1 array's) field of view may be projected into the object space, and each sensor may capture a partial image comprising a portion of the target scene according to that sensor's field of view. In some embodiments, the fields of view 140, 145 for the opposing sensor arrays 105, 125 may overlap by a certain amount 150. To reduce the overlap 150 and form a single image, a stitching process as described below may be used to combine the images from the two opposing sensor arrays 105, 125. Certain embodiments of the stitching process may employ the overlap 150 for identifying common features in stitching the partial images together. After stitching the overlapping images together, the stitched image may be cropped to a desired aspect ratio, for example 4:3 or 1:1, to form the final image.



FIG. 2 depicts a high-level block diagram of a device 200 having a set of components including an image processor 220 linked to one or more image sensor assemblies 215a-n. The image processor 220 is also in communication with a working memory 205, memory 230, and device processor 250, which in turn is in communication with storage 210 and electronic display 225.


Device 200 may be a cell phone, digital camera, tablet computer, personal digital assistant, or the like. There are many portable computing devices in which a reduced thickness imaging system such as is described herein would provide advantages. Device 200 may also be a stationary computing device or any device in which a thin imaging system would be advantageous. A plurality of applications may be available to the user on device 200. These applications may include traditional photographic and video applications, high dynamic range imaging, panoramic photo and video, or stereoscopic imaging such as 3D images or 3D video.


The image capture device 200 includes the image sensor assemblies 215a-n for capturing external images. The image sensor assemblies 215a-n may each comprise a sensor, lens assembly, and a primary and secondary reflective or refractive surface for redirecting a portion of a target image to each sensor, as discussed above with respect to FIG. 1A. In general, N image sensor assemblies 215a-n may be used, where N≧2. Thus, the target image may be split into N portions in which each sensor of the N sensor assemblies captures one portion of the target image according to that sensor's field of view. However, some embodiments may employ only one image sensor assembly, and it will be understood that image sensor assemblies 215a-n may comprise any number of image sensor assemblies suitable for an implementation of the folded optic imaging device described herein. The number of sensors may be increased to achieve lower z-heights of the system, as discussed in more detail below with respect to FIG. 4, or to meet the needs of other purposes, such as having overlapping fields of view similar to that of a plenoptics camera, which may enable the ability to adjust the focus of the image after post-processing. Other embodiments may have a field of view overlap configuration suitable for high dynamic range cameras enabling the ability to capture two simultaneous images and then merge them together. The image sensor assemblies 215a-n may be coupled to the camera processor 220 to transmit captured image to the image processor 220.


The image processor 220 may be configured to perform various processing operations on received image data comprising N portions of the target image in order to output a high quality stitched image, as will be described in more detail below. Processor 220 may be a general purpose processing unit or a processor specially designed for imaging applications. Examples of image processing operations include cropping, scaling (e.g., to a different resolution), image stitching, image format conversion, color interpolation, color processing, image filtering (e.g., spatial image filtering), lens artifact or defect correction, etc. Processor 220 may, in some embodiments, comprise a plurality of processors. Certain embodiments may have a processor dedicated to each image sensor. Processor 220 may be one or more dedicated image signal processors (ISPs) or a software implementation of a processor.


As shown, the image processor 220 is connected to a memory 230 and a working memory 205. In the illustrated embodiment, the memory 230 stores capture control module 235, image stitching module 240, and operating system 245. These modules include instructions that configure the image processor 220 of device processor 250 to perform various image processing and device management tasks. Working memory 205 may be used by image processor 220 to store a working set of processor instructions contained in the modules of memory 230. Alternatively, working memory 205 may also be used by image processor 220 to store dynamic data created during the operation of device 200.


As mentioned above, the image processor 220 is configured by several modules stored in the memories. The capture control module 235 may include instructions that configure the image processor 220 to adjust the focus position of imaging sensor assemblies 215a-n. Capture control module 235 may further include instructions that control the overall image capture functions of the device 200. For example, capture control module 235 may include instructions that call subroutines to configure the image processor 220 to capture raw image data of a target image scene using the imaging sensor assemblies 215a-n. Capture control module 235 may then call the image stitching module 240 to perform a stitching technique on the N partial images captured by the sensor assemblies 215a-n and output a stitched and cropped target image to imaging processor 220. Capture control module 235 may also call the image stitching module 240 to perform a stitching operation on raw image data in order to output a preview image of a scene to be captured, and to update the preview image at certain time intervals or when the scene in the raw image data changes.


Image stitching module 240 may comprise instructions that configure the image processor 220 to perform stitching and cropping techniques on captured image data. For example, each of the N sensors 215a-n may capture a partial image comprising a portion of the target image according to each sensor's field of view. The fields of view may share areas of overlap, as described above with respect to FIG. 1B and below with respect to FIGS. 3C, 4C, 5B and 6B. In order to output a single target image, image stitching module 240 may configure the image processor 220 to combine the multiple N partial images to produce a high-resolution target image. Target image generation may occur through known image stitching techniques. Examples of image stitching can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/623,050 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


For instance, image stitching module 240 may include instructions to compare the areas of overlap along the edges of the N partial images for matching features in order to determine rotation and alignment of the N partial images relative to one another. Due to rotation of partial images and/or the shape of the field of view of each sensor, the combined image may form an irregular shape. Therefore, after aligning and combining the N partial images, the image stitching module 240 may call subroutines which configure image processor 220 to crop the combined image to a desired shape and aspect ratio, for example a 4:3 rectangle or 1:1 square. The cropped image may be sent to the device processor 250 for display on the display 225 or for saving in the storage 210.


Operating system module 245 configures the image processor 220 to manage the working memory 205 and the processing resources of device 200. For example, operating system module 245 may include device drivers to manage hardware resources such as the imaging sensor assemblies 215a-n. Therefore, in some embodiments, instructions contained in the image processing modules discussed above may not interact with these hardware resources directly, but instead interact through standard subroutines or APIs located in operating system component 270. Instructions within operating system 245 may then interact directly with these hardware components. Operating system module 245 may further configure the image processor 220 to share information with device processor 250.


Device processor 250 may be configured to control the display 225 to display the captured image, or a preview of the captured image, to a user. The display 225 may be external to the imaging device 200 or may be part of the imaging device 200. The display 225 may also be configured to provide a view finder displaying a preview image for a use prior to capturing an image, or may be configured to display a captured image stored in memory or recently captured by the user. The display 225 may comprise an LCD or LED screen, and may implement touch sensitive technologies.


Device processor 250 may write data to storage module 210, for example data representing captured images. While storage module 210 is represented graphically as a traditional disk device, those with skill in the art would understand that the storage module 210 may be configured as any storage media device. For example, the storage module 210 may include a disk drive, such as a floppy disk drive, hard disk drive, optical disk drive or magneto-optical disk drive, or a solid state memory such as a FLASH memory, RAM, ROM, and/or EEPROM. The storage module 210 can also include multiple memory units, and any one of the memory units may be configured to be within the image capture device 200, or may be external to the image capture device 200. For example, the storage module 210 may include a ROM memory containing system program instructions stored within the image capture device 200. The storage module 210 may also include memory cards or high speed memories configured to store captured images which may be removable from the camera.


Although FIG. 2 depicts a device having separate components to include a processor, imaging sensor, and memory, one skilled in the art would recognize that these separate components may be combined in a variety of ways to achieve particular design objectives. For example, in an alternative embodiment, the memory components may be combined with processor components to save cost and improve performance.


Additionally, although FIG. 2 illustrates two memory components, including memory component 230 comprising several modules and a separate memory 205 comprising a working memory, one with skill in the art would recognize several embodiments utilizing different memory architectures. For example, a design may utilize ROM or static RAM memory for the storage of processor instructions implementing the modules contained in memory 230. The processor instructions may be loaded into RAM to facilitate execution by the image processor 220. For example, working memory 205 may comprise RAM memory, with instructions loaded into working memory 205 before execution by the processor 220.


Turning to FIGS. 3A-C, one embodiment of a folded optic sensor array 300 will be described in more detail. The array 300 comprises two 3×1 rows of sensor assemblies and a central light redirection surface 335, for example a mirror. As shown in FIG. 1A, sensor assemblies A-F may each include an image sensor, a lens assembly, and a secondary reflective surface. Some embodiments of the sensor array 300 configuration may have a field of view of 82 degrees.


As illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, sensor assembly A 305, sensor assembly B 310, and sensor assembly C 315 are aligned parallel to one another adjacent along a first axis 301 on one side 337 of the central mirror 335. Sensor assembly D 320, sensor assembly E 325, and sensor assembly F 330 are aligned parallel to one another adjacent along a second axis 302 on the opposite side 338 of central mirror 335. The first and second axis are aligned parallel to a central line of symmetry 336 of central mirror 335. Although as depicted there is a uniform gap between each sensor assembly on an axis, the amount of this gap is variable, and some embodiments may arrange the sensors with no gap between them, for example by cutting the sensors as a group from a silicon wafer.



FIG. 3B illustrates a perspective view of the central mirror 335 displaying three distinct mirrored surfaces 337, 338 and 339. Mirrored surface 337 redirects light comprising a portion of the target image toward sensor assembly 320. This portion of the target image corresponds to the field of view of sensor 320. Mirrored surface 338 redirects another portion of the target image toward sensor assembly 325, and mirrored surface 339 redirects a third portion of the target image toward sensor assembly 330. Although not shown in the view illustrated by FIG. 3B, the opposite side of the central mirror comprises three similar surfaces reflecting light toward sensor assemblies 305, 310, and 315.


The fields of view of each of the sensors in the array 300 are illustrated in FIG. 3C. Field of view 360 corresponds to sensor 320, field of view 365 corresponds to sensor 325, and field of view 370 corresponds to sensor 330. Due in part to the relative angle of central mirror surfaces 337 and 338, fields of view 360 and 365 share a triangular overlap. Fields of view 365 and 370 may also share a triangular overlap of the same specifications. As the central mirror 335 is symmetrical about line of symmetry 336, fields of view 345, 350, and 355 may bear a similar relationship to one another as fields of view 360, 365 and 370. Further, the two rows of the sensor array may share overlapping fields of view. Fields of view 365 and 350 share a rectangular overlap. In some embodiments, the sensors in the array may capture a plurality of images according to the illustrated fields of view, and the plurality of images may be stitched together and cropped to the rectangular boundary 340 in order to produce the target image.



FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a folded optic sensor assembly 400 comprising a sensor 405, a lens system 495, a first reflective surface 480 and a second reflective surface 401.


In the folded optic sensor assembly 400, the first reflective surface 480 may be positioned at an angle τo relative to the plane on which sensor 405 is mounted. The second reflective surface 401 may be positioned at an angle τi relative to the plane on which sensor 405 is mounted. The sensor 405 may have a diagonal field of view γ and a field of view of the height of the sensor γH determined at least in part by sensor height 410. The lens system 495 may be positioned a distance 445 from first reflective surface 480, measured along a central axis from point do on the receiving edge of lens system 495 to point Qo on reflective surface 480. The lens system may be positioned a distance 430 from second reflective surface 401, measured along a central axis from point di on the light transmitting edge of lens system 495 to point Qi on reflective surface 401.


Incident light 475 comprising the target image scene travels toward first reflective surface 480. The incident beam 475 hits the surface 480 at point Po and then is reflected off of the surface 480 and travels as reflected beam 470 toward the lens system 495. Incident beam 475 forms an angle αo relative to the receiving edge of lens system 495, and reflected beam 470 forms an angle βo relative to the receiving edge of lens system 495. The angle of reflection between incident beam 475 and reflected beam 470 is denoted by variable δo.


The reflected beam 470 then enters lens system 495 and passes through at least one lens of diameter 465. The lens system 495 has a length 435 and diameter 425. Within the lens system, the target image is of height 460. A distance 440 marks the position of the lens diaphragm from the edge of the lens system 495. In embodiments which employ a converging lens, the light may converge at a focal point R then travel out the other side of the lens system 495.


After leaving lens system 495, a beam of the light 455 is incident upon the secondary reflective surface 401. The incident beam 455 hits the surface 480 at point Pi and then is reflected off of the surface 401 and travels as reflected beam 450 toward the sensor 405. Reflected beam 450 forms an angle αi relative to the light transmitting edge of lens system 495, and incident beam 455 forms an angle βi relative to the light transmitting edge of lens system 495. The angle of reflection between incident beam 455 and reflected beam 450 is denoted by variable δi.


The relationship between the aforementioned variables defined, in some 2D embodiments, by the following equations:

α=π−β−δ
β=(π−γH)/2
δ=π−γH−2τ


The minimum Z-height 490 of the system 400 with folded optics is determined by the minimum back focal length. The minimum back focal length may be used to calculate a maximum value for the diameter 425 of the lens system. The diameter 425 of the lens system determines the value of the Z-distance to the sensor 420 and the value of the Z-distance to top of mirror 485. Adding together the values of the Z-distance to the sensor 420 and the Z-distance to top of mirror 485 provides the minimum Z-height for the system 480.


In an embodiment, both the Z-distance to the sensor 420 and the distance to the secondary reflective surface 430 are minimal, and thus the assembly 400 has the minimum back focal length that is required to use folded optics. This may occur when the diameter of the lens system 425 is increased to the point at which the reflected beam 450 just does not intersect with the lens system 495 and the sensor 405 just does not intersect with the lens system 495 and second reflective surface 401. At this point, the diameter of the lens system 425 also may have reached its maximum value.


The minimum Z-height of the system 490 with folded optics is related to the minimum back focal length, and from the minimum back focal length the maximum value for the diameter of lens system 425 may be calculated. The back focal length of the lens system 495 with folded optics may be calculated by adding the distance to the second reflective surface 401 and the distance to sensor 415. In one embodiment, the field of view γH may be fixed at 40 degrees, the height of the sensor 405 may be 1.6 mm, and the sensor 405 may be a 1 Mpx sensor. The back focal length may be 2 mm when the lens diameter 465 is 0.5 mm. In some embodiments, the number of sensors in a folded optic sensor array may be increased to achieve lower Z-heights.


In one embodiment, the sensor 405 may be a 5 MP sensor with 1.4 μm pixel pitch and the field of view γH may be 65 degrees. The effective focal length of this embodiment may be 3.57 mm when focused at infinity. Similarly, the effective focal length of an embodiment with an 8 MP sensor with a 1.12 μm pixel pitch may also be 3.57 mm, as the sensor can be the same physical size as the 5 MP sensor. It is possible for the Z-height of the system 490 of theses embodiments to be around 3.9 mm.



FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate two embodiments of six sensor folded optic arrays with corresponding fields of view. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 4, the sensor assemblies of these embodiments may each comprise a sensor, lens system, and a reflective surface positioned to guide light onto the sensor. The central mirrors discussed in these embodiments may be manufactured as an assembly of separate reflective surfaces or may be manufactured as a singular prism with multiple reflective surfaces.



FIG. 5A illustrates another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array 500 with a first row of sensor assemblies 510, 520, and 530 and a second row of sensor assemblies 540, 550, and 560 around a central mirror 505. The sensor assemblies in each row may be rotated or tilted relative to one another, such that the sensors are not mounted in the same plane. For example, the outer sensor assemblies 510, 530 and 540, 560 may be rotated plus or minus approximately 21 degrees with respect to the center sensors 520, 550. The central axes of the assemblies may be in one plane which is parallel to an image plane. Certain embodiments of the sensor assembly 500 may measure 11 mm×12 mm−4.5 mm (W×L−Z-height). Of course, embodiments are not limited to these rotations, and other degrees of rotation are contemplated.


Central mirror 505 may comprise six surfaces, each surface configured to redirect light comprising a portion of a target image scene toward one of the sensor assemblies. For example, surface 570 may direct light at sensor assembly 540, surface 580 may direct light at sensor assembly 550, and surface 590 may direct light at sensor assembly 560. In one embodiment, surfaces 570 and 590 may be angled at 76×31.3 degrees (top×bottom) and surface 580 may be angled at 76.4 degrees×0 degrees (top×bottom). Although not visible in the perspective view of FIG. 5A, the side of central mirror 505 may comprise three additional surfaces corresponding to sensor assemblies 510, 520, and 530. One embodiment may comprise a complex mirror with ten facets, six of which may be reflective surfaces. Some embodiments of the central mirror may comprise a complex mirror with six facets, and other embodiments may comprise three separate wedge shaped mirrors. In other embodiments with N sensors, the central mirror may comprise N surfaces, wherein each of the N surfaces is configured to direct light comprising a portion of a target image scene toward one of the N sensors.



FIG. 5B illustrates another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array 501 in which six sensor assemblies 511, 521, 531, 541, 551, and 561 are mounted around in a generally circular pattern around a cluster of three central mirrors 571, 581, and 591. In some embodiments, there may be approximately a 76 degree angle between sensor assemblies 511 and 541 and sensor assemblies 531 and 561. The sensor assemblies may be mounted in the same plane, for example on a substantially flat substrate. In some embodiments, the sensors in the sensor assemblies may be arranged perpendicular to the mounting surface. Each sensor may view a different part of the total field.


Central mirrors 571, 581, and 591 may also be mounted on the substrate. Central mirrors 571, 581, and 591 may each be a separate wedge-shaped mirror. Surface 571 may direct light at both sensor assemblies 511 and 541. Surface 581 may comprise two separate reflective surfaces, a first surface which may direct light at sensor assembly 551 and a second surface which may direct light at sensor assembly 521. Surface 591 may direct light at both sensor assemblies 531 and 561. Certain embodiments of the sensor array 501 may measure 15 mm×17 mm−3.6 mm (W×L−Z-height).


In an embodiment, the sensors in the array 501 may be 5 megapixels with a 1.4 μm pixel size and 4:3 ratio, and having dimensions of 3.61×2.71 mm (W×H). In another embodiment, the sensors may be 8 megapixels with a 1.12 μm pixel size and 4:3 ratio, and having dimensions of 3.66×2.74 mm (W×H). The field of view of each sensor may be 40 degrees. The overall size of the array 501 in certain embodiments may be no larger than 18×18−2.5 mm (W×L−Z-height). There may be a 5% to 10% overlap between the fields of view of the various sensors at object distances greater than or equal to 20 cm. Angular overlap may be constant as function of object distance, or at least constant asymptotically.


Certain embodiments of the arrays 500, 501 may employ a similar lens assembly to the lens system 495 depicted in FIG. 4. All lens systems in certain embodiments of the array may have the same focal length, lens diameter and length, which may yield desirable results with respect to maximizing the usable sensor area. Maximizing usable sensor area may also be achieved by using different designs for the lens systems of the inner and outer sensors. In some embodiments, the lens diameter may be approximately 1.3 mm, and the focal distance may be approximately 2.7 mm. The maximum possible length of the lens system may be approximately 2.3 mm, and the diameter (height) of the lens system may be approximately 1.6 mm. The total field of view of the array 501 may be 83 degrees.



FIG. 5C illustrates an embodiment of the projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor array embodiments of FIGS. 5A-B. Although the sensor and central mirror configurations are different between the two array embodiments 500, 501, they share the same field of view configuration. Field of view 515 corresponds to sensors 510, 511; field of view 525 corresponds to sensors 520, 521; field of view 535 corresponds to sensors 530, 531; field of view 545 corresponds to sensors 540, 541; field of view 555 corresponds to sensors 550, 551; and field of view 565 corresponds to sensors 560, 561.


Fields of view 515 and 525 may share a triangular overlap where the angular overlap varies between 1-4 degrees in the X and Y-directions. In some embodiments the overlap may be more than 4 degrees. For example in some embodiments the overlap may be 10 degrees or more in cases where it may be appropriate as a design, based at least in part on the efficiency of usage of sensor area and related loss. In some embodiments where the angular overlap is 3 degrees, at 1 meter fields of view 515 and 525 may have an overlap comprising 3.3% of the total captured area of the two overlapping fields of view. Fields of view 525 and 535, fields of view 545 and 555, and field of view 555 and 565 may also share a triangular overlap of the same specifications. Further, fields of view 515 and 545 may share a triangular overlap of 5.1% at 4 degrees. Fields of view 535 and 565 share a similar overlap. Fields of view 525 and 555 overlap over the sensor array 500, 501 and may share 3.3% at 3 degrees. The field of view of the entire array 500, 501 may be 82 degrees. Some embodiments of the overlapping fields of view may be cropped to a rectangular 4:3 aspect ratio 596, resulting in an 18.8% loss. Other embodiments may be cropped to a 1:1 square aspect ratio 595, resulting in a loss of 11.3%.


In other embodiments, fields of view 515 and 525 may have an overlap of 5.2 degrees comprising 6.7% of the total captured area of the two overlapping fields of view. Fields of view 525 and 535, fields of view 545 and 555, and field of view 555 and 565 may also share a triangular overlap of the same specifications. Further, fields of view 515 and 545 may share a triangular overlap of 8.5% at 4.9 degrees. As sown, fields of view 535 and 565 share a similar overlap. Fields of view 525 and 555 overlap over the sensor array 500, 501 and may share 7.5% at 5.3 degrees. Other embodiments may share larger or smaller percentages of captured area at a variety of angles. Some embodiments of the overlapping fields of view may be cropped to a rectangular 4:3 aspect ratio 596, resulting in a 24.2% loss. Other embodiments may be cropped to a largest rectangle, resulting in a loss of 6.6%. The total field of view may be 76 degrees. However, these numbers are based on visual optimization of overlap areas, and vary dependent upon factors such as allowable loss area and object distance.


In one embodiment of sensor array 500, the center-center overlap (525, 555) may be 5% at 3.7 degrees, the side-side overlap may be 5.1% at 4 degrees, and the center-side overlap may be 3.3% at 3.3 degrees. Cropping at a 4:3 rectangular aspect ratio may result in an 18.8% loss, while cropping at the largest rectangle possible may result in an 11.3% loss. In one embodiment of sensor array 501, the center-center overlap (525, 555) may be 5% at 4.7 degrees, the side-side overlap may be 5% at 4 degrees, and the center-side overlap may be 3.6% at 2.2 degrees. Cropping at a 4:3 rectangular aspect ratio may result in a 19.4% loss, while cropping at the largest rectangle possible may result in an 11.2% loss. In another embodiment of sensor array 501, the center-center overlap (525, 555) may be 2.4% at 1.6 degrees, the side-side overlap may be 8% at 6.2 degrees, and the center-side overlap may be 6.9% at 4.3 degrees. Cropping at a 4:3 rectangular aspect ratio may result in a 14.2% loss, while cropping at the largest rectangle possible may result in a 14.2% loss. The total field of view may be 83 degrees. In one embodiment, the final image may be around 19 megapixels after 4:3 cropping.


Limiting the total Z-height of the system may result in a portion of each sensor in the array becoming unusable due to the limited height of each secondary mirror. For example, in one embodiment of array 501 employing sensor assemblies such as are described in FIG. 4, and in which the Z-height of the system is constrained to 2.5 mm, sensors 551 and 521 may have a usable area of 54.2% and sensors 511, 531,541 and 561 may have a usable area of 52.1%. The height of the usable sensor may be around 2 mm under the height constraint for the system.



FIG. 6A illustrates another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array 600. The sensor array 6600 with a first row of sensor assemblies 610, 620, and 630 and a second row of sensor assemblies 640, 650, and 660 around a central mirror 505. The sensor assemblies in each row may be rotated or tilted relative to one another, such that the sensors are not mounted in the same plane. In some embodiments, such a sensor configuration provides a plurality of rectangular images, as the image plane and focal plane may be parallel. Certain embodiments of the sensor array 600 may measure 12 mm×15 mm−4.6 mm (W×L−Z-height).


Central mirror 670 may comprise six surfaces, each surface configured to redirect light comprising a portion of a target image scene toward one of the sensor assemblies. Some embodiments of the central mirror may comprise a complex mirror with six facets, and other embodiments may comprise three separate wedge shaped mirrors. For example, surface 673 may direct light at sensor assembly 640, surface 672 may direct light at sensor assembly 650, surface 671 may direct light at sensor assembly 560, and surface 674 may direct light at sensor 630. Although not visible in the perspective view of FIG. 6A, the opposite side of central mirror 505 may comprise two additional surfaces corresponding to sensor assemblies 510 and 520. In other embodiments with N sensors, the central mirror may comprise N surfaces, wherein each of the N surfaces is configured to direct light comprising a portion of a target image scene toward one of the N sensors.



FIG. 6B illustrates an embodiment of projected fields of view of the folded optic sensor array 600 of FIG. 6A. Field of view 615 corresponds to sensor 610, field of view 625 corresponds to sensor 620, field of view 635 corresponds to sensor 630, field of view 645 corresponds to sensor 640, field of view 655 corresponds to sensor 650, and field of view 665 corresponds to sensor 660.


Fields of view 615 and 625 may share a rectangular overlap that is constant in the X- and Y-direction and constant asymptotically in the Z-direction. In some embodiments where the angular overlap is 1.8 degrees, at 1 meter fields of view 615 and 625 may have an overlap comprising 3.3% of the total captured area of the two overlapping fields of view. Fields of view 625 and 635, fields of view 645 and 655, and fields of view 655 and 665 may also share a rectangular overlap of the same specifications. Center fields of view 625 and 655 may share a rectangular overlap of 5.1% at 3.4 degrees. Side fields of view 615 and 645, as well as 635 and 665, may share a rectangular overlap of 5% at 3.6 degrees. Cropping to a rectangular 4:3 aspect ratio 680 may result in a 15.6% loss, and cropping to a 1:1 square aspect ratio 690 may result in a 4% loss.


In another embodiment, the angular overlap between fields of view 615 and 625 may be 3-5 degrees, and 1 meter fields of view 615 and 625 may have an overlap comprising 4%-6% of the total captured area of the two overlapping fields of view. Fields of view 625 and 635, fields of view 645 and 655, and fields of view 655 and 665 may also share a rectangular overlap of the same specifications. Center fields of view 625 and 655 may share a rectangular overlap of 6%-8% at 4-8 degrees. Side fields of view 615 and 645, as well as 635 and 665, may share a rectangular overlap of 6%-9% at 4-10 degrees. Cropping to a rectangular 4:3 aspect ratio 680 may result in a 17.8% loss, and cropping to a largest rectangle may result in a 4.5% loss. The total field of view may be between 70 and 120 degrees. However, these numbers are based on visual optimization of overlap areas, and vary dependent upon factors such as allowable loss area and object distance.



FIG. 7 illustrates another embodiment of a folded optic sensor array 700 with a plurality of sensor assemblies 705 and a plurality of central mirrors 710. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 4, each sensor assembly may comprise a sensor, a lens system, and a reflective surface configured to redirect light from the lens system onto the sensor. In this embodiment, a sensor array comprising two 3×1 arrays on either side of a central mirror 710 has been repeated, such that there is a 2×2 cascading array of the sensor arrays. Other embodiments may employ any suitable cascaded array configuration



FIG. 8 illustrates another embodiment of a folded optic sensor assembly 800. Essentially the mirrors are reversed in position as compared to the embodiments described above. For example, light comprising the target image is incident on two primary reflective surfaces 820, 821 which surround the sensor 810, 811. The light is redirected inward through two lens assemblies 840, 841 and then reflected off central secondary reflective surfaces 830, 831 and down onto sensors 810, 811. Sensors 810, 811 may represent individual sensors or an array of sensors.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a folded optic image capture process 900. The process 900 begins at step 905, in which a plurality of imaging sensor assemblies. This step includes any of the sensor array configurations discussed above with respect to the previous images. The sensor assemblies may include, as discussed above with respect to FIG. 4, a sensor, lens system, and a reflective surface positioned to redirect light from the lens system onto the sensor. The process 900 then moves to step 910, in which at least one reflective surface is mounted proximate to the plurality of image sensors. For example, this step could comprise mounting a central mirror between two rows of sensor arrays, wherein the central mirror comprises a surface associated with each sensor in the arrays.


The process 900 then transitions to step 915, in which light comprising a target image of a scene is reflected off of the at least one reflective surface toward the imaging sensors. For example, a portion of the light may be reflected off of each of a plurality of surfaces toward each of the plurality of sensors. This step may further comprise passing the light through a lens assembly associated with each sensor, and may also include reflecting the light off of a second surface onto a sensor. Step 915 may further comprise focusing the light using the lens assembly or through movement of any of the reflective surfaces.


The process 900 may then move to step 920, in which the sensors capture a plurality of images of the target image scene. For example, each sensor may capture an image of a portion of the scene corresponding to that sensor's field of view. Together, the fields of view of the plurality of sensors cover at least the target image in the object space.


The process 900 then may transition to step 925 in which an image stitching method is performed to generate a single image from the plurality of images. In some embodiments, the image stitching module 240 of FIG. 2 may perform this step. This may include known image stitching techniques. Further, any areas of overlap in the fields of view may generate overlap in the plurality of images, which may be used in aligning the images in the stitching process. For example, step 925 may further include identifying common features in the overlapping area of adjacent images and using the common features to align the images.


Next, the process 900 transitions to step 930 in which the stitched image is cropped to a specified aspect ratio, for example 4:3 or 1:1. Finally, the process ends after storing the cropped image at step 935. For example, the image may be stored in storage 210 of FIG. 2, or may be stored in working memory 205 of FIG. 2 for display as a preview image of the target scene.


Clarifications Regarding Terminology


Those having skill in the art will further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and process steps described in connection with the implementations disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention. One skilled in the art will recognize that a portion, or a part, may comprise something less than, or equal to, a whole. For example, a portion of a collection of pixels may refer to a sub-collection of those pixels.


The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the implementations disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.


The steps of a method or process described in connection with the implementations disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of non-transitory storage medium known in the art. An exemplary computer-readable storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the computer-readable storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal, camera, or other device. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal, camera, or other device.


Headings are included herein for reference and to aid in locating various sections. These headings are not intended to limit the scope of the concepts described with respect thereto. Such concepts may have applicability throughout the entire specification.


The previous description of the disclosed implementations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these implementations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. An image capture system for capturing a target image of a scene, the system comprising: a plurality of image sensors, each of the plurality of image sensors having one of a plurality of fields of view, each of the plurality of fields of view comprising a substantially different portion of the scene;a plurality of lens assemblies, each lens assembly corresponding to one of the plurality of image sensors;at least one primary surface positioned so as to reflect light comprising at least a portion of the scene through the plurality of lens assemblies;a plurality of reflective secondary surfaces, each of the plurality of lens assemblies positioned between the at least one primary surface and a corresponding one of the plurality of secondary surfaces such that each of the plurality of secondary surfaces receives at least a portion of the light from one of the plurality of lens assemblies and reflects the received light toward a corresponding one of the plurality of image sensors, and wherein each of the plurality of image sensors captures one of a plurality of partial images, each of the plurality of partial images corresponding to one of the plurality of fields of view; anda processing module configured to assemble the plurality of partial images into the target image.
  • 2. The image capture system of claim 1, further comprising a substantially flat substrate, wherein the plurality of image sensors are positioned on the substantially flat substrate.
  • 3. The image capture system of claim 2, wherein the plurality of sensors are positioned laterally adjacent to one another on the substrate.
  • 4. The image capture system of claim 2, wherein the plurality of sensors are arranged in two rows on the substrate, and wherein the at least one primary surface is positioned between the two rows.
  • 5. The image capture system of claim 2, wherein the plurality of sensors are arranged in a circular manner around the primary surface on the substrate.
  • 6. The image capture system of claim 1, wherein the at least one primary surface comprises a prism having at least one surface configured to reflect the light.
  • 7. The image capture system of claim 6, wherein the prism comprises a plurality of facets, and wherein each of the plurality of facets reflects a portion of the light comprising one of the plurality of fields of view toward one of the plurality of lens assemblies.
  • 8. The image capture system of claim 1, wherein the at least one primary surface comprises a plurality of primary reflective surfaces, and wherein each of the plurality of primary reflective surfaces reflects a portion of the light comprising one of the plurality of fields of view toward one of the plurality of lens assemblies.
  • 9. A method of capturing a target image of a scene, the method comprising: providing plurality of image sensors, each of the plurality of image sensors having one of a plurality of fields of view, each of the plurality of fields of view comprising a substantially different portion of the scene;providing a plurality of lens assemblies, each lens assembly corresponding to one of the plurality of image sensors;reflecting light comprising at least a portion of the scene toward each of the plurality of lens assemblies using at least one primary surface;reflecting the light from each of the plurality of lens assemblies toward a corresponding one of the plurality of image sensors using a plurality of reflective secondary surfaces, the plurality of secondary surfaces each positioned between a corresponding one of the plurality of lens assemblies and the corresponding one of the plurality of image sensors;capturing a plurality of partial images, wherein each of the plurality of partial images is captured by one of the plurality of image sensors and corresponds to one of the plurality of fields of view; andassembling the plurality of partial images into the target image.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein assembling the plurality of partial images comprises: combining the plurality of partial images into a combination image; andcropping the combination image according to a desired aspect ratio to produce the target image.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein assembling the plurality of partial images comprises: determining at least one area of overlap in the plurality of partial images; andaligning the plurality of partial images based at least in part on the at least one area of overlap, thereby generating an aligned image comprising the scene.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising cropping the aligned image according to a desired aspect ratio to produce the target image.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, further comprising focusing the plurality of partial images using the plurality of lens assemblies.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein directing light comprising at least a portion of the scene toward each of the plurality of lens assemblies comprises reflecting the light using at least one primary reflective surface.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein reflecting the light using at least one primary reflective surface comprises reflecting a portion of the light comprising one of the plurality of fields of view toward each of the plurality of lens assemblies using a plurality of primary reflective surfaces.
  • 16. The method of claim 9, wherein directing light comprising at least a portion of the scene toward each of the plurality of lens assemblies comprises refracting the light using at least one prism.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein refracting the light using at least one prism comprises refracting the light through a plurality of facets of the prism, wherein a portion of the light comprising each one of the plurality of fields of view is refracted through one of the plurality of facets toward one of the plurality of lens assemblies.
  • 18. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that when executed by a processor perform a method comprising: capturing image data of a plurality of portions of a target image scene using a plurality of image sensors, each of the plurality of image sensors having one of a plurality of substantially different fields of view determined by reflecting light comprising at least a portion of the scene from at least one primary surface through one of a plurality of lens assemblies and then reflecting said light off of one of a plurality of reflective secondary surfaces, and wherein each of the plurality of portions of the target image corresponds to one of the plurality of fields of view;wherein the first field of view and the second field of view are determined at least in part based on at least one surface configured to reflect or refract light comprising the scene toward the first and second image sensors; andcombining the plurality of portions of the target image into the target image.
  • 19. An image capture system for capturing a target image of a scene, the system comprising: a central reflective component positioned to receive light representing the scene and reflect the light toward a plurality of cameras; andthe plurality of cameras, each of the plurality of cameras comprising: an image sensor configured to capture a portion of the light representing the scene,a lens assembly positioned to receive the portion of the light from the central reflective component, andan additional reflective surface positioned between the lens assembly and the image sensor such that the additional reflective surface receives the portion of the light from the lens assembly and reflects the portion of the light onto the image sensor.
  • 20. The image capture system of claim 19, wherein, for each of the plurality of cameras, the lens assembly is positioned between the central reflective component and the additional reflective surface.
  • 21. The image capture system of claim 19, wherein the central reflective component comprises a plurality of reflective surfaces, each of the plurality of reflective surfaces positioned to redirect a portion of the light toward a corresponding one of the plurality of cameras.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/716,339 filed Oct. 19, 2012, entitled “MULTI-CAMERA SYSTEM USING FOLDED OPTICS” and assigned to the assignee hereof. The disclosure of this prior application is considered part of, and is incorporated by reference in, this disclosure.

US Referenced Citations (200)
Number Name Date Kind
4114171 Altman Sep 1978 A
4437745 Hajnal Mar 1984 A
4639586 Fender et al. Jan 1987 A
4740780 Brown et al. Apr 1988 A
4751570 Robinson Jun 1988 A
5012273 Nakamura et al. Apr 1991 A
5016109 Gaylord May 1991 A
5063441 Lipton et al. Nov 1991 A
5142357 Lipton et al. Aug 1992 A
5194959 Kaneko et al. Mar 1993 A
5207000 Chang et al. May 1993 A
5231461 Silvergate et al. Jul 1993 A
5243413 Gitlin et al. Sep 1993 A
5313542 Castonguay May 1994 A
5475617 Castonguay Dec 1995 A
5539483 Nalwa Jul 1996 A
5606627 Kuo Feb 1997 A
5614941 Hines Mar 1997 A
5640222 Paul Jun 1997 A
5642299 Hardin et al. Jun 1997 A
5686960 Sussman et al. Nov 1997 A
5721585 Keast et al. Feb 1998 A
5734507 Harvey Mar 1998 A
5745305 Nalwa Apr 1998 A
5793527 Nalwa Aug 1998 A
5903306 Heckendorn et al. May 1999 A
5926411 Russell Jul 1999 A
5990934 Nalwa Nov 1999 A
6111702 Nalwa Aug 2000 A
6115176 Nalwa Sep 2000 A
6128143 Nalwa Oct 2000 A
6141145 Nalwa Oct 2000 A
6144501 Nalwa Nov 2000 A
6195204 Nalwa Feb 2001 B1
6219090 Nalwa Apr 2001 B1
6285365 Nalwa Sep 2001 B1
6356397 Nalwa Mar 2002 B1
6611289 Yu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6628897 Suzuki Sep 2003 B2
6650774 Szeliski Nov 2003 B1
6700711 Nalwa Mar 2004 B2
6701081 Dwyer et al. Mar 2004 B1
6768509 Bradski et al. Jul 2004 B1
6775437 Kazarinov et al. Aug 2004 B2
6798406 Jones et al. Sep 2004 B1
6809887 Gao et al. Oct 2004 B1
6850279 Scherling Feb 2005 B1
6855111 Yokoi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861633 Osborn Mar 2005 B2
7006123 Yoshikawa et al. Feb 2006 B2
7039292 Breiholz May 2006 B1
7084904 Liu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7116351 Yoshikawa Oct 2006 B2
7215479 Bakin May 2007 B1
7253394 Kang Aug 2007 B2
7271803 Ejiri et al. Sep 2007 B2
7336299 Kostrzewski et al. Feb 2008 B2
7612953 Nagai et al. Nov 2009 B2
7710463 Foote May 2010 B2
7805071 Mitani Sep 2010 B2
7817354 Wilson Oct 2010 B2
7893957 Peters et al. Feb 2011 B2
7961398 Tocci Jun 2011 B2
8004557 Pan Aug 2011 B2
8098276 Chang et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115813 Tang Feb 2012 B2
8139125 Scherling Mar 2012 B2
8228417 Georgiev et al. Jul 2012 B1
8267601 Campbell et al. Sep 2012 B2
8284263 Oohara et al. Oct 2012 B2
8294073 Vance et al. Oct 2012 B1
8356035 Baluja et al. Jan 2013 B1
8400555 Georgiev et al. Mar 2013 B1
8482813 Kawano et al. Jul 2013 B2
8791984 Jones et al. Jul 2014 B2
8988564 Webster et al. Mar 2015 B2
20010028482 Nishioka Oct 2001 A1
20020070365 Karellas Jun 2002 A1
20020136150 Mihara et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030024987 Zhu Feb 2003 A1
20030038814 Blume Feb 2003 A1
20030214575 Yoshikawa Nov 2003 A1
20040021767 Endo et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040066449 Givon Apr 2004 A1
20040105025 Scherling Jun 2004 A1
20040183907 Hovanky et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040246333 Steuart et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263611 Cutler Dec 2004 A1
20050053274 Mayer et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057659 Hasegawa Mar 2005 A1
20050081629 Hoshal Apr 2005 A1
20050111106 Matsumoto et al. May 2005 A1
20050185711 Pfister et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050218297 Suda et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060023074 Cutler Feb 2006 A1
20060023106 Yee et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060023278 Nishioka Feb 2006 A1
20060140446 Luo et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060193509 Criminisi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060215054 Liang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060215903 Nishiyama Sep 2006 A1
20060238441 Benjamin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070024739 Konno Feb 2007 A1
20070058961 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070064142 Misawa et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070085903 Zhang Apr 2007 A1
20070164202 Wurz et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070216796 Lenel et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070242152 Chen Oct 2007 A1
20070263115 Horidan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070268983 Elam Nov 2007 A1
20080088702 Linsenmaier et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080117289 Schowengerdt et al. May 2008 A1
20080218612 Border et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080259172 Tamaru Oct 2008 A1
20080266404 Sato Oct 2008 A1
20080290435 Oliver et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080291543 Nomura et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297612 Yoshikawa Dec 2008 A1
20080316301 Givon Dec 2008 A1
20090003646 Au et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090005112 Sorek et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090015812 Schultz et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090051804 Nomura et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090085846 Cho et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090096994 Smits Apr 2009 A1
20090153726 Lim Jun 2009 A1
20090160931 Pockett et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090268983 Stone et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296984 Nijim et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090315808 Ishii Dec 2009 A1
20100044555 Ohara et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100045774 Len et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100066812 Kajihara et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100165155 Chang Jul 2010 A1
20100202766 Takizawa et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100215249 Heitz et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232681 Fujieda et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100259655 Takayama Oct 2010 A1
20100265363 Kim Oct 2010 A1
20100278423 Itoh et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100289878 Sato et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100302396 Golub et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100309286 Chen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100309333 Smith et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001789 Wilson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110007135 Okada et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009163 Fletcher et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110012998 Pan Jan 2011 A1
20110043623 Fukuta et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110090575 Mori Apr 2011 A1
20110096089 Shenhav et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110096988 Suen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110128412 Milnes et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110213664 Osterhout et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110235899 Tanaka Sep 2011 A1
20110249341 Difrancesco et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110304764 Shigemitsu et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120008148 Pryce et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120033051 Atanassov et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120044368 Lin et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056987 Fedoroff Mar 2012 A1
20120075168 Osterhout et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120249750 Izzat et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120249815 Bohn et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269400 Heyward Oct 2012 A1
20120281072 Georgiev et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120293607 Bhogal et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120293632 Yukich Nov 2012 A1
20120327195 Cheng Dec 2012 A1
20130003140 Keniston et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130010084 Hatano Jan 2013 A1
20130070055 Atanassov et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130141802 Yang Jun 2013 A1
20130222556 Shimada Aug 2013 A1
20130229529 Lablans Sep 2013 A1
20130260823 Shukla et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130278785 Nomura et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130286451 Verhaegh Oct 2013 A1
20130335598 Gustavsson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130335600 Gustavsson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140104378 Kauff et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140111650 Georgiev et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140139623 McCain et al. May 2014 A1
20140152852 Ito et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140184749 Hilliges et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192253 Laroia Jul 2014 A1
20150049172 Ramachandra et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150177524 Webster et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150244934 Duparre et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150286033 Osborne Oct 2015 A1
20150288865 Osborne Oct 2015 A1
20150370040 Georgiev Dec 2015 A1
20150371387 Atanassov Dec 2015 A1
20150373252 Georgiev Dec 2015 A1
20150373262 Georgiev Dec 2015 A1
20150373263 Georgiev Dec 2015 A1
20150373268 Osborne Dec 2015 A1
20150373269 Osborne Dec 2015 A1
20150373279 Osborne Dec 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
101201459 Jun 2008 CN
101581828 Nov 2009 CN
0610605 Aug 1994 EP
0751416 Jan 1997 EP
1176812 Jan 2002 EP
1383342 Jan 2004 EP
1816514 Aug 2007 EP
1832912 Sep 2007 EP
2242252 Oct 2010 EP
2354390 Mar 2001 GB
2354391 Mar 2001 GB
H089424 Jan 1996 JP
H0847001 Feb 1996 JP
H08125835 May 1996 JP
8194274 Jul 1996 JP
H08242453 Sep 1996 JP
2001194114 Jul 2001 JP
2003304561 Oct 2003 JP
3791847 Jun 2006 JP
2006279538 Oct 2006 JP
2007147457 Jun 2007 JP
2007323615 Dec 2007 JP
2008009424 Jan 2008 JP
2010041381 Feb 2010 JP
2010067014 Mar 2010 JP
2010128820 Jun 2010 JP
2010524279 Jul 2010 JP
WO-9321560 Oct 1993 WO
WO-9847291 Oct 1998 WO
WO-2006075528 Jul 2006 WO
WO-2007129147 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2008112054 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2009047681 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009086330 Jul 2009 WO
WO-2010019757 Feb 2010 WO
WO-2012136388 Oct 2012 WO
WO-2012164339 Dec 2012 WO
WO-2013154433 Oct 2013 WO
WO-2014012603 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014025588 Feb 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2013/064381—ISA/EPO—Mar. 21, 2014 (130200WO).
Arican, et al., “Intermediate View Generation for Perceived Depth Adjustment of Sterio Video”, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, http://www.merl.com, TR2009-052, Sep. 2009; 12 pages.
Hoff, et al., “Surfaces from Stereo: Integrating Feature Matching, Disparity Estimation, and Contour Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 121-136, Feb. 1989.
Murphy M., et al., “Lens Drivers Focus on Performance in High-Resolution Camera Modules,” Analog Dialogue, Nov. 2006, vol. 40, pp. 1-3.
Narkhede, et al., “Stereoscopic Imaging: A Real-Time, In Depth Look,” IEEE Potentials, Feb./Mar. 2004, vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 38-42.
Sun W.S., et al., “Single-Lens Camera Based on a Pyramid Prism Array to Capture Four Images,” Optical Review, 2013, vol. 20 (2), pp. 145-152.
Krotkov E., et al., “Active vision for reliable ranging: Cooperating focus, stereo, and vergence”, International Journal of Computer Vision. vol. 11, No. 2, Oct. 1, 1993, pp. 187-203, XP055149875, ISSN: 0920-5691. DOI: 10.1007/BF01469228.
Ricoh Imagine Change: “New RICOH THETA Model, Capturing 360-degree Images in One Shot, is on Sale Soon—Spherical Video Function, API and SDK (Beta Version)”, News Release, Oct. 28, 2014, 3 pages.
Han Y., et al., “Removing Illumination from Image Pair for Stereo Matching”, Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), 2012 International Conference on, IEEE, Jul. 16, 2012, XP032278010, pp. 508-512.
Shuchun Y., et al., “Preprocessing for stereo vision based on LOG filter”, Proceedings of 2011 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology, Aug. 2011, XP055211077, pp. 1074-1077.
Hao M., et al., “Object Location Technique for Binocular Stereo Vision Based on Scale Invariant Feature Transform Feature Points”, SIFT, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, Jun. 2009, vol. 30, No. 6 pp. 649-653.
Kawanishi T., et al., “Generation of High-Resolution Stereo Panoramic Images by Omnidirectional Imaging Sensor Using Hexagonal Pyramidal Mirrors”, Patiern Recognition, 1998, Proceedings, Fourteenth International Conference on Brisbane, QLD., Australia Aug. 16-20, 1998, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc, US, Jan. 1, 1998, pp. 485-489, vol. 1, XP031098377, ISBN: 978-0-8186-8512-5.
Tan K-H., et al., “Multiview Panoramic Cameras Using a Pyramid”, Omnidirectional Vision, 2002, Proceedings, Third Workshop on Jun. 2, 2002, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 87-93, XP010611080, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1629-5.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140111650 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61716339 Oct 2012 US