The present invention relates, in various embodiments, to adhesive systems that include multiple complementary adhesion structures.
Various types of adhesives have been fabricated for different, often specialized, applications. While many adhesives are liquids, e.g., glues or epoxies, such adhesives are often not suitable for all applications, for example those in which cleanliness or only a temporary bond are important. Numerous modern adhesives are solids and form reversible bonds. However, many such adhesives are very specialized, i.e., they may resist a delamination force in shear or tension, but not both. Furthermore, many individual adhesives adhere only to specific surface types, e.g., smooth, rough, hard, soft, etc. Certain types of adhesives also require a preload force (i.e., a force applied in a direction normal to a surface) in order to bond to a surface. Moreover, many mechanical “adhesives” such as electromagnets, electrostatic clamps, and suction cups require applied power or vacuum to maintain their bond.
Thus, while most adhesives function quite well for specific applications and limited surface types, there is a wide range of applications that potentially involve the need for bonding and delamination on multiple surface types in several configurations for which such adhesives may not work well. There exists a need, therefore, for adhesive systems that are more widely applicable and that compensate for deficiencies in individual adhesives.
The foregoing limitations of conventional adhesives are herein addressed by embodiments of adhesive systems that incorporate multiple adhesion structures. As utilized herein, the term “adhesion structure” includes many types of materials and/or structures that adhere to a surface, with or without applied power or vacuum. Adhesion structures include, but are not limited to, pressure-sensitive adhesives such as tapes, nanostructured dry adhesives such as “gecko adhesives,” suction cups, claws that engage (i.e., adhere to, grip by friction, and/or slightly penetrate) a surface, electrostatic clamps, microspines, permanent magnets, and electromagnets. In general, a “solid adhesion structure” has a solid physical form and mechanical integrity, as distinguished, for example, from liquid and even highly viscous curable chemical adhesives, although it should be understood that a solid adhesion structure, such as a strip of tape, may include a chemical adhesive component.
In one embodiment, the adhesion structures in the system complement each other, compensating for their individual deficiencies. Moreover, the adhesion structures may be solid and may form reversible bonds to allow repositioning upon a variety of surfaces. In this manner, specialized applications such as improved wall-climbing apparatuses and grappling hooks are enabled.
In one aspect, embodiments of the invention feature an adhesive system that includes (i) a first solid adhesion structure that requires an applied normal preload force to achieve adhesion to a surface, and (ii) a second solid adhesion structure separate from but joined to the first adhesion structure. Both adhesion structures are jointly adherable to the surface upon application of the normal preload force. The second adhesion structure may be separately adherable to the surface without the normal preload force. The adhesion structures may be structurally complementary and/or functionally complementary such that, when the adhesive system is adhered to a surface, each adhesion structure overcomes an adhesion limitation exhibited by the other adhesion structure.
Embodiments of the invention may include one or more of the following. The first adhesion structure may be a pressure-sensitive adhesive, a nanostructured dry adhesive, a claw, or a microspine. The second adhesion structure may be a microspine, a suction cup, an electrostatic clamp, a permanent magnet, or an electromagnet. The first and second adhesion structures may be joined by a pivot. The adhesive system may include a human- and/or robot-manipulable interface for adhering the first and second adhesion structures to a surface. The adhesion structures may be connected to the end of a rope and/or disposed on a sheet. The adhesion structures may be non-curable and/or may be disposed proximate the concave surface of a suction cup. The adhesive system may additionally include one or more mechanical grippers such as claws. The first adhesion structure may include at least one microspine and the second adhesion structure may include a nanopatterned dry adhesive. The normal preload force may be supplied by the second solid adhesion structure to the first solid adhesion structure.
In another aspect, embodiments of the invention feature a method of adhering to a surface an adhesive system that includes first and second joined adhesion structures. At least one of the adhesion structures requires an applied normal preload force to achieve adhesion to the surface. The method includes applying the normal preload force to the adhesive system, whereby both adhesion structures are jointly adhered to the surface. The first adhesion structure may be a pressure-sensitive adhesive, a nanostructured dry adhesive, a claw, or a microspine. The second adhesion structure may be a microspine, a suction cup, an electrostatic clamp, a permanent magnet, or an electromagnet. The method may include disengaging the adhesive system from the surface and applying the normal preload force to the adhesive system to adhere it to the surface in another location. Applying the normal preload force to the adhesive system may include applying a force, approximately parallel to the surface, to a pivot connected to the first and second adhesion structures. The first and second adhesion structures may be non-curable. The first and second adhesion systems may be disposed proximate the concave surface of a suction cup, and applying the normal preload force may include affixing the suction cup to the surface. The second adhesion structure may apply the normal preload force to the first adhesion structure.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become more apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and may exist in various combinations and permutations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
Referring to
In various embodiments, adhesion structures 110, 120 are generally solid, man-made materials which are capable of forming a reversible bond with a variety of possible surfaces. Many types of structures are contemplated as suitable adhesion structures 110, 120, including, but not limited to:
In another embodiment, adhesion structure 120 includes or consists essentially of a suction cup, and adhesion structure 110 includes or consists essentially of a pressure-sensitive adhesive that is coated over at least a portion of the concave surface of adhesion structure 120. Vacuum is applied to adhesion structure 120 to adhere it to surface 130, thereby also providing the requisite normal preload force to adhere adhesion structure 110 to surface 130. Even in the absence of further vacuum to maintain the “seal” of adhesion structure 120, adhesion of adhesive system 100 is maintained at least by adhesion structure 110.
As described above, an advantage of adhesive system 100 is that its individual components, i.e., adhesion structures 110, 120, may be structurally complementary (i.e., easily joined together to form a unified manipulable whole) as well as functionally complementary. That is, when adhesive system 100 is adhered to surface 130, each of adhesion structures 110, 120 overcomes an adhesion limitation exhibited by the other. For example, adhesion structure 110 may exhibit better adhesion (in the shear or normal directions) than adhesion structure 120, but may require a normal preload force to achieve adhesion. Adhesion structure 120, on the other hand, may adhere simply due to attractive force but may require at least periodic application of voltage (e.g., for an electromagnet or electrostatic clamp) or vacuum (e.g., for a suction cup), or may exhibit poor shear adhesion (e.g., a magnet). When adhesion structures 110, 120 are combined, each compensates for the limitations of the other, and adhesive system 100 exhibits superior adhesive properties over a wide range of surfaces 130.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
With reference still to
The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms and expressions of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof. In addition, having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2451194 | Braun | Oct 1948 | A |
3236715 | Gunderson | Feb 1966 | A |
3476257 | O'Connell | Nov 1969 | A |
3857560 | Gundlach | Dec 1974 | A |
4120304 | Moor | Oct 1978 | A |
5162138 | Caflisch et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5342665 | Krawitz | Aug 1994 | A |
5513456 | Gleason | May 1996 | A |
5776289 | Steidinger | Jul 1998 | A |
5903869 | Jacobson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6084010 | Baetzold et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6127002 | Callahan, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6293038 | Chang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6431513 | Rosen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6572945 | Bries et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6660352 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6722026 | Lent | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737160 | Full et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6773780 | Hutter, III | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800168 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6858110 | Himmelsbach et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6872439 | Fearing et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7011723 | Full et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7186878 | Beaudry | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7695811 | Northen et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20020090480 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120332 | Law et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185222 | Wigdorski et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030070998 | Bulka | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124312 | Autumn | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040005454 | Full et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020883 | Brokaw | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040071870 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076822 | Jagota et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050072509 | Full et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092414 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119640 | Sverduk et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148984 | Lindsay et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151385 | Autumn et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181629 | Jagota et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224975 | Basavanhally et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050271869 | Jackson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271870 | Jackson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274454 | Extrand | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060029697 | Robbins et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060261109 | Browne et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080280085 | Livne | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 942 054 | Sep 1999 | EP |
2 249 148 | May 1975 | FR |
2 393 097 | Dec 1978 | FR |
WO-02-34855 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-2008-018747 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Creton, C., Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course. MRS Bulletin, 2003. 28(6): p. 434-439. |
Daltorio, K.A. et al., A Robot that Climbs Walls using Micro-structured Polymer Feet.. in International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR), 2005. London, p. 131-138. |
Autumn, K., How Gecko Toes Stick, in American Scientist vol. 94, 2006, p. 124-132. |
Geim, A.K. et al., Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nature Materials, 2003, 2: p, 461-463. |
Sitti, M. and R. Fearing, Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2003. 17(8): p. 1055-1073. |
Northen, M.T. and K.L. Turner, A batch fabricated biomimetic dry adhesive. Nanotechnology, 2005. 16: p. 1159-1166. |
Yurdumakan, B. et al., Synthetic gecko foot-hairs from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Communications, 2005: p. 3799-3801. |
Olson, K.A. et al., Characterization, modeling, and design on an electrostatic check with improved wafer temperature uniformity. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1995, 66(2): p. 1108-1114. |
Peichel, D. et al., Silicon Fabricated Submicrometer Stepper motor for Microsurgical Procedures. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2002. 11(2): p. 154-160. |
Enikov, E.T. and K.V. Lazarov, Optically transparent gripper for microassembly, in Microrobotics and Microassembly III. 2001: Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4568, pp. 40-49. |
Provancher, W.R. et al., Towards Penetration-based Clawed Climbing, in International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR), 2004. Madrid, Spain, pp. 1-9. |
Asbeck, A.T. et al., Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2006. 15(12): p. 1165-1180. |
Asbeck, A.T. et al., Climbing Walls with Microspines. in 2006 Conference on International Robotics and Automation. 2006. Orlando, FL: IEEE. |
Kim, S. et al., Spinybot II: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines. in International Conference on Advanced Robotics. 2005. Seattle, WA: IEEE, p. 601-606. |
Autumn, K., et al., Robots in Scansorial Environments in Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Proceedings of SPIE, 2005. vol. 5804: p. 291-302. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/041912, mailed Jul. 16, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090269536 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |