The present invention relates to the field of lighting devices, and more particularly to a LED lighting system with a distribution of LED controllers.
Luminaires based on red, green, and blue (RGB) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) generate various colors of light, which produce white or colored light when properly combined. RGB LED luminaires are used, for example, in LCD back-lighting, commercial-freezer lighting, and white light illumination.
Usually, for these multi-color LED-based luminaires, the controller of the light engine receives from a user or a higher level system, e.g. a building management system, the desired or targeted color point and light level. These setting values can be specified with tristimulus values in CIE x, y, L representing a certain position in the CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram created by the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE), and thus need to be transformed into duty cycles or power levels for each connected LED color. Then, the transformation can be individually performed by a distribution of LED controllers through a calibration matrix (inverted C-matrix) shared between all of them.
However, illumination by means of such LED-based luminaires presents difficulties because the optical and electrical properties of individual LEDs vary with temperature, forward current, aging and manufacturing process. In particular, change in temperature of the LED p-n junction leads to changes in light flux output and peak wavelength of the LED, such that the calculations through the calibration matrix are also temperature dependent.
Additionally, it can be possible that no entity inside the light engine has a gamut knowledge. Under these circumstances, these variations can hence lead to abnormal situations for which the light engine cannot render the targeted color point and light level externally input by the user or the higher level system. Examples of such abnormal situations can be non-existing color points, e.g. (0,1), (1,0), (0.05,0.1), or color points outside the color gamut of the light engine due for example to multiple luminaires connected to the same communication databus controlled by the light engine, requiring thereby negative power levels for some LED colors, or light levels at a color point beyond the capabilities of the light engine, requiring thereby power levels beyond the capabilities of the corresponding LED colors.
In normal situations, each LED controller can perform the aforementioned calculations independently of the other since a single row of the calibration matrix is needed. However, in abnormal situations such as described herein, the LED controllers are required to communicate between them through the parameters of the calibration matrix to achieve a logical behavior. But this is not always possible according to the architecture of the light engine.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide for a multi-core LED lighting system architecture enabling logical behavior for invalid or out-of-range target settings.
This object is achieved by a lighting system as claimed in claim 1, a method of adjusting internally a out-of-gamut targeted value as claimed in claim 19, a method of adjusting internally a out-of-range targeted value as claimed in claim 9, a method of adjusting externally, e.g. through an external user or a higher level system, a out-of-gamut and/or out-of-range targeted value as claimed in claim 16, and a method of adjusting internally and externally a out-of-gamut and/or out-of-range targeted value as claimed in claim 14.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a lighting system comprising: at least one light emitting diode (LED); a communication databus; a controller for controlling the communication databus in broadcast mode; a plurality of control units for individually controlling each of the at least one LED, each control unit being in data communication with the controller via the databus; wherein, the controller is input by at least one targeted value from a user and broadcasts, via the databus, the at least one targeted value towards the plurality of control units; at least one amongst the plurality of control units has an incapacity to comply with the at least one targeted value, and each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units transmits a signal for notifying upon the incapacity; the controller broadcasts, via the databus, an adjusted value with respect to the at least one targeted value towards the plurality of control units.
Thereby, the solution as an adjusted value can be communicated to all the control units thanks to the databus in broadcast mode, such that the lighting system can ensure a logical behavior when handling target values it cannot render.
In the following, advantageous embodiments will be described, which are also defined in the dependent claims. The embodiments can be combined with each other, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
The adjusted value may be a value adjusted by the controller in response to the signal transmitted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units towards the controller. Thereby, the controller is notified upon the incapacity of at least one control unit to comply with the at least one targeted value.
The adjusted value may be a value desaturated with respect to the at least one targeted value, and in particular a desaturated color point, such that the at least one targeted value may be considered by the lighting system as a out-of-gamut color point.
The adjusted value may be a value selected by the controller amongst the values adjusted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units, the signal being transmitted towards the controller and further comprising the values adjusted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units. Thereby, the controller is notified upon the incapacity of at least one control unit to comply with the at least one targeted value, and also upon the solutions as adjusted values proposed by each of the at least one control unit to comply with the at least one targeted value. Through the selection, a single adjusted value is selected, and the desaturated value is prioritized over the selected value.
Each of the values adjusted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units may be a value reduced with respect to the at least one targeted value. Thereby, the selected adjusted value will be a value reduced with respect to the at least one targeted value.
The adjusted value selected by the controller may be the lowest value amongst the values adjusted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units. Thereby, all the control units will comply with the adjusted value broadcast to all of them by the controller over the databus.
In particular, the adjusted value may be a reduced light level at the color point with respect to the at least one targeted value, such that the at least one targeted value may be considered by the lighting system as a out-of-range light level at the color point.
The adjusted value broadcast by the controller may be originated from the user. In a first aspect, the value may be adjusted by the user in response to the signal transmitted by each of the at least one amongst the plurality of control units towards the user. Thereby, the at least one targeted value may be externally adjusted, in response to the notification upon the incapacity of at least one control unit to comply with the at least one targeted value, received by the user. In a second aspect, the value may already be adjusted. For example, it may be the value selected by the controller, the value directly adjusted by the controller, the value adjusted by the control unit if alone to be not in compliance with the at least one targeted value, or a combination between them. The user is thus not only notified upon the incapacity of at least one control unit to comply with the at least one targeted value, but also notified upon the solution.
The signal transmitted by the at least one control unit unable to comply with the at least one targeted value towards the controller may be carried out via the bus, namely internally.
The signal transmitted by the at least one control unit unable to comply with the at least one targeted value towards the user is carried out via a feedback link, namely externally.
The at least one targeted value may be transformed through a calibration matrix into a duty cycle for each color emitted by the at least LED. Thereby, the calibration matrix is shared by all of the control units, such that a communication between them is required in the case that the targeted value cannot be rendered by the lighting system.
In accordance with the present invention and derived from which precedes, there are also provided a method of adjusting internally a out-of-gamut targeted value, a method of adjusting internally a out-of-range targeted value, a method of adjusting externally, e.g. through an external user or a higher level system, a out-of-gamut and/or out-of-range targeted value, and a method of adjusting internally and externally a out-of-gamut and/or out-of-range targeted value.
The steps of the previous methods can be carried out by a computer program including program code means, when the computer program is carried out on a computer.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the figures as fully explained in the detailed description of embodiments of the invention.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiment(s) described hereinafter. In the following drawings:
The LED lighting system 100, e.g. a light engine, is a multi-core architecture comprising a light bar of at least one light emitting diode (LED) 10R, 10G, 10B, typically three LEDs of different primary colors: red R, green G and blue B. Each LED 10R, 10G, 10B is connected to a respective driver 20R, 20G, 20B for allowing current to flow through each of them. The drivers 20R, 20G, 20B are individually controlled by a distribution of respective LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, i.e. control units.
The LED lighting system 100 further comprises a central controller 40 and a communication databus 50. The targeted setting values, e.g. a color point and/or a light level, are externally input by a user 60 or a higher level system, e.g. a building management system, to the central controller 40, which then broadcasts the targeted setting values over the databus 50 to all the LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B.
The targeted setting values are specified with tristimulus values in CIE x, y, L representing a certain position in the CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram. The LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B individually carry out some calculations for allowing the targeted setting values to be transformed, through a shared calibration matrix (inverted C-matrix), into a duty cycle or power level for each LED color R, G, B.
Furthermore, if several LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B are unable to comply with the targeted setting values, the central controller 40, in response to the signals sent by each of these LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30Bs, selects the lowest light level at the color point amongst the light levels sent by these signals, and broadcasts over the databus 50 the color point with the newly adjusted light level to all the LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B. Again, the process repeats until the targeted setting values can be rendered by the LED lighting system 100.
Thus, through this selection, it is to be noted that the targeted color point is prioritized over the targeted light level, and this matches with the eye sensitivity to color point differences higher than the eye sensitivity to the light level differences. It is furthermore to be noted that every entity in the LED lighting system 100 still deals with the color point information of a single color.
Furthermore, if several LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B are unable to comply with the targeted setting values, the central controller 40 communicates after selection the solution, i.e. the lowest light level at the color point amongst the light levels sent by each of these LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, towards the external user 60 or the higher level system. The user 60 or the higher level system can then decide either to submit these new targeted setting values back to the central controller 40, which then broadcasts them over the databus 50 to all the LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, or to submit other values. The process repeats until the targeted setting values can be rendered by the LED lighting system 100.
Thus, despite the fact that the central controller 40 can be considered as a “dumb” controller, which just controls the databus 50 in broadcast mode, and the fact that no entity (central controller 40, databus 50, LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, etc.) inside the LED lighting system 100 has a gamut knowledge, the present invention shows that it is possible of handling the targeted setting values wherein the color point and/or light level is invalid or out-of-range. This can be achieved by using “internal intelligence” of the LED lighting system 100 provided by the LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, and/or “external intelligence” provided by the user 60 or a higher level system, as well as the databus 50 in broadcast mode for enabling the communication with all the LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B, and thus obtaining a logical behavior of the LED lighting system 100 under these circumstances.
In summary, a LED lighting system 100, comprising at least a central controller 40 for just controlling a communication databus 50 in broadcast mode, and a distribution of LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B for individually controlling each LED 10R, 10G, 10B through a respective driver 20R, 20G, 20B, has been described. The central controller 40 broadcasts targeted setting values from an external user 60 to all the distributed LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B through the databus 50. The LED controllers 30R, 30G, 30B convert the values using a shared calibration matrix into transformed values for each LED color R, G, B. In the case that some of these transformed values cannot be rendered by the LED lighting system 100, the targeted setting values can be properly adjusted either externally through a feedback signal sent over a link 70 back to the user 60, or internally through a notification signal broadcast over the databus 50 back to the central controller 40.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive; the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Thus, it is noted that the invention applies to any LED controllers, taken singly or combined between them, which are unable to comply with the targeted setting values.
Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.
In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single . . . or other unit may fulfill the functions of several items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measured cannot be used to advantage.
A computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems.
Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08101378 | Feb 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/050415 | 2/2/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/5/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/098633 | 8/13/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6495964 | Muthu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6608453 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7315139 | Selvan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
20060176528 | Dalrymple et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070040512 | Jungwirth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070273290 | Ashdown et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080203945 | Deurenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090189530 | Ashdown et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090236994 | Deurenberg | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100315007 | Schulz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327755 | Meijer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1229733 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 622 427 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2007033667 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007052195 | May 2007 | WO |
2007072321 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007141748 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100320941 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |