Multi currency exchanges between participants

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8712913
  • Patent Number
    8,712,913
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 6, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 29, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for facilitating payment transactions in multiple currencies between participants is provided. In one embodiment, an option is provided to a user to select a currency in which to make a payment. An indication of the selected currency in which to make the payment is received. A determination is made as to whether the selected currency is a primary currency of an account of the user. Based on the selected currency being different from the primary currency of the account of the user, the payment is converted to the selected currency.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the field of e-commerce and, more specifically, to facilitating payment transactions in multiple currencies between participants.


BACKGROUND

Typically, an electronic payment system allows participants of a network-based transaction facility to collect payments online. For example, the payer may send money to the electronic payment system using a credit card or check, or funds in a payer account maintained by the electronic payment system. Recipients can store money in their accounts maintained by the electronic payment system, transfer the money to a separate bank account or have the electronic payment system cut them a check.


With the growth in international commerce, problems arise due to different monetary systems used in different countries. That is, money is generally expressed in different currencies in different countries and the value of the different currencies varies greatly.


Currency conversion is widely used to convert money from one currency into money of a different currency. However, currency conversion represents a significant economic risk to both buyers and sellers in international commerce. For example, when a buyer in the U.S. desires to buy a product in an online transaction facility from a seller in France, the buyer may use a credit card to pay the seller for the product. The credit card company may pay the seller in Euros, and then at an undetermined later date, it will bill an amount to the buyer in U.S. dollars. The amount billed to the buyer is determined by an exchange rate used at the time the credit card company settles the transaction. The time of this settlement is at the credit card company's discretion. The risk to the credit card company is minimal because the credit card company can settle the transaction when exchange rates are favorable. Thus, in this case, it is the buyer who bears the risk that the value of the buyer's currency wilt decline prior to this settlement.


In another example, a seller participating in an online transaction facility may decide to accept a different currency to be able to sell the product. In this case, the seller may later sell the currency to a currency trader, usually at a discount. The price the seller charges to the buyer who pays cash reflects both the cost of currency conversion and the risk that the rate used to establish the price of the product in a particular currency may have changed. This typically results in the buyer paying a higher price for the product and the seller incurring risk due to a possible change in currency exchange rates.


In yet another example, a buyer may convert from the native currency to a different second currency before the sale to be able to buy a product from a seller who only accepts payments in the second currency. In this case, the buyer can purchase goods at a price in the second currency, but cannot be certain of the value of the second currency relative to the buyer's native currency. Thus, the individual assumes the risk of devaluation of the second currency against the first currency. Further, the buyer bears the risk that the second currency may cease to be convertible into his native currency.


The above problems create inconvenience and uncertainty for participants in international commerce, thus discouraging the development of international commerce over electronic networks.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a system for processing online multi currency payment transactions between participants in a network-based transaction facility;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a multicurrency transfer module;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a send payment sub-module;



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method for processing submissions of online multi currency payments;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a receive payment sub-module;



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method for processing receipts of online multicurrency payments;



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a user account manager;



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method for managing multicurrency balances of a user;



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method for obtaining guaranteed exchange rates;



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method for facilitating multi currency payment transactions between participants of a network-based transaction facility;



FIGS. 10-20 are exemplary representations of various interfaces; and



FIG. 21 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a computer system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in multiple currencies between users over a communications network are described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.


System for Processing Online Payment Transactions



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a system for processing online payment transactions in multiple currencies between participants in a network-based transaction facility. In this embodiment, a client 100 is coupled to a transaction facility 130 via a communications network, including a wide area network 110 such as, for example, the Internet. Other examples of networks that the client may utilize to access the transaction facility 130 include a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network.


The client 100 represents a device that allows a user to participate in a transaction facility 130. The transaction facility 130 handles all transactions between various participants including the user of the client computer 100. In one embodiment, the transaction facility 130 may be an online auction facility represented by an auction web site visited by various participants including the user of the client computer 100. Alternatively, the transaction facility 130 may be an online retailer or wholesaler facility represented by a retailer or wholesaler web site visited by various buyers including the user of the client computer 100. In yet other embodiments, the transactions facility 130 may be any other online environment used by a participant to conduct business transactions.


The transaction facility 130 is coupled to an online payment service 120. In one embodiment, the transaction facility 130 is coupled to the online payment service 120 via a communications network such as, for example, an internal network, the wide area network 110, a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network. Alternatively, the online payment service 120 is integrated with the transaction facility 130 and it is a part of the transaction facility 130. The online payment service 120 is also coupled to the client 100 via any of the described above communications networks. The online payment service 120 is a service for enabling online payment transactions between participants of the transaction facility 130, including the user of the client computer 100.


In one embodiment, the online payment service 120 includes a multi-currency transfer module 150 that allows the participants to maintain account balances in different currencies and make online payments in different currencies in the course of business conducted in the transaction facility 130. The term “currency” as referred to herein may include, for example, denominations of script and coin that are issued by government authorities as a medium of exchange. In another example, a “currency” may also include a privately issued token that can be exchanged for another privately issued token or government script. For example, a company might create tokens in various denominations. This company issued “money” could be used by employees to purchase goods from sellers. In this case, an exchange rate might be provided to convert the company currency into currencies which are acceptable to merchants.


As will be discussed in more detail below, in one embodiment, the multi currency transfer module 150 allows the participants to make educated decisions as to which currency to choose for sending and receiving payments. In another embodiment, the multi currency module 150 provides the participants with a mechanism for managing their account balances in different currencies.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a multicurrency transfer module 200. The multicurrency transfer module 200 includes, in one embodiment, a send payment sub-module 202, a receive payment sub-module 204, a user account manager 206, and a rate controller 208.


In one embodiment, the send payment sub-module 202 is responsible for facilitating a sender selection of a currency in which a payment to a recipient is to be made, for funding the payment, for notifying a recipient about the payment, and for handling returned or denied payments. In one embodiment, if the sender does not hold an account balance in the currency that he or she selects for the payment, the send payment sub-module 202 is responsible for automatically converting funds from an existing sender balance in a different currency into the selected currency.


In one embodiment, the receive payment sub-module 204 is responsible for assisting a recipient in making a decision with respect to an acceptance of a sender payment in a specific currency, for converting the sender payment into a different currency if needed, and for notifying the sender about the recipient's decision.


In one embodiment, the user account manager 206 is responsible for allowing users to hold account balances in different currencies, for opening/removing currency balances within user accounts, and for performing transfers of funds between different currency balances within a user account.


In one embodiment, the rate controller 208 is responsible for periodically obtaining exchange rates from a third party system and using these rates to refresh rates stored in a database of the online payments service.


In one embodiment, the multi currency transfer module 200 also includes a request money sub-module that allows users to request money in any currency using a request money user interface with a list of currencies for user selection.


In one embodiment, the multicurrency transfer module 200 also includes a withdraw funds sub-module that allows users to withdraw money from any currency balance to a user bank account. If the withdrawal requires conversion, the relevant conversion data is presented to the user and the user is requested to confirm the final withdrawal.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a send payment sub-module 300. The send payment sub-module 300 includes, in one embodiment, a transaction information receiver 302, a conversion calculator 304, a sender funds analyzer 306, and a recipient communicator 308.


The transaction information receiver 302 is responsible for communicating to a sender a user interface that facilitates user input of transaction information such as a recipient identifier (e.g., a recipient email address), a payment amount, a currency to be used for the payment, etc. In one embodiment, the user interface presents to the sender a list of currencies supported by the online payment system (e.g., U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros, pounds sterling, yen, etc.) and the sender is asked to select a specific currency from the list. The transaction information receiver 302 is further responsible for receiving transaction information entered by the sender via the user interface.


In one embodiment, if the currency selected by the sender for the payment is not a sender primary currency, the conversion calculator 304 is invoked. In another embodiment, the conversion calculator 304 is invoked only if the sender does not hold an account balance in the selected currency. Once invoked, the conversion calculator 304 is responsible for providing a current exchange rate between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency and for calculating an equivalent value in the sender primary currency for the payment amount. The primary currency may be, for example, a currency used in the majority of payment transactions that involved the sender. In another example, the primary currency is a currency that was specifically identified by the sender as primary. In yet another example, the primary currency may be a currency of a country in which the sender resides or a default currency provided by the online payment service 120.


The transaction information receiver 302 displays to the sender the conversion information provided by the conversion calculator 304 and requests the sender to confirm the payment in the selected currency. Once the sender sees the conversion information, the sender may decide that the current exchange rate for the selected currency is not favorable and select another currency. Alternatively, the sender may consider the current exchange rate as favorable and confirm the payment in the selected currency. In one embodiment, the sender may request, prior to confirming the payment, to view the history of currency conversion calculations from the sender's previous payment transactions to decide whether the current exchange rate is favorable.


The recipient communicator 308 is responsible for informing the recipient about the sender's payment in the selected currency, receiving data indicating whether the recipient decides to accept the payment in this currency, and communicating the recipient's decision to the sender. In one embodiment, if the recipient decides to deny the payment, the recipient communicator 308 displays to the sender a message offering to select a different currency.


The sender funds analyzer 306 is responsible for analyzing the sender's funds and determining how to fund the payment in the sender-selected currency. In one embodiment, if the sender holds an account balance in the selected currency, the sender funds analyzer 306 uses this account balance to fund the payment. Alternatively, if the sender does not hold an account balance in the selected currency, the sender funds analyzer 306 may use an account balance in the sender's primary currency to fund the payment. If the funds in the sender's primary balance are not enough to cover the payment, the sender funds analyzer 306 may ask the sender to specify an additional source for funding. This additional source may be, for example, a sender credit card, a sender bank account, a sender balance other then the primary balance, etc. In one embodiment, the sender is presented with relevant conversion information before requesting the sender's confirmation of any conversion that is necessary to fund the payment.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method 400 for processing submissions of online multicurrency payments. The method 400 may be performed by processing logic, which may comprise hardware, software, or a combination of both. Processing logic may reside either in the online payment service 120, or partially or entirely in a separate device and/or system(s).


Referring to FIG. 4, the method 400 begins with processing logic communicating to a sender via a communications network a user interface that facilitates the sender input with respect to a desired currency in which a payment is to be made (processing block 402). In one embodiment, the user interface presents to the sender, for his or her selection, a list of currencies that are supported by the online payment service 120.


At processing block 404, processing logic receives data identifying the sender-selected currency from the sender via the communications network. In response, in one embodiment, processing logic determines whether the sender-selected currency is the sender's primary currency. If it is not, processing logic determines the current exchange rate for conversion between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency. In another embodiment, processing logic determines the current exchange rate only if the sender does not hold an account in the sender-selected currency.


Next, processing logic communicates to the sender via the communications network the current exchange rate for the conversion between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency (processing block 406). In one embodiment, processing logic also presents to the sender an equivalent value in the sender primary currency for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency. The presentation of the current conversion information (e.g., the exchange rate and the equivalent value) assist the sender in determining whether the terms for converting into the sender-selected currency are favorable at the present time. In addition, in one embodiment, the sender is provided with an opportunity to view the history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the sender to compare the current terms with prior terms.


Further, if processing logic receives from the sender a confirmation of the payment in the sender-selected currency (decision box 408), processing logic notifies the recipient about the payment in the sender selected currency (processing block 410).



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a receive payment sub-module 500. The receive payment sub-module 500 includes, in one embodiment, a transaction information receiver 502, a conversion calculator 504, a recipient decision determinator 506, and a sender notifier 508.


The transaction information receiver 302 is responsible for receiving information about a sender's payment and communicating it to the recipient. The information about the sender payment may include, for example, the identifier of the sender (e.g., sender's name or email address), the payment amount, the sender-selected currency of the payment, etc.


In one embodiment, the transaction information receiver 502 is also responsible for determining whether the recipient holds an account balance in the sender-selected currency. If so, the transaction information receiver 502 is responsible for requesting a transfer of the payment amount to this account balance. If the recipient does not hold an account balance in the sender-selected currency, the conversion calculator 504 is invoked to provide a current exchange rate between the sender-selected currency and the recipient primary currency, and then the recipient decision determinator 506 communicates the current exchange rate to the recipient and requests the recipient's input with respect to an acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency. If the recipient accepts the payment in the sender-selected currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 requests to open a balance in the sender-selected currency within the recipient account. Alternatively, if the recipient accepts the payment in the sender-selected currency but also asks to convert it into the primary currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 performs the conversion and requests the addition of the resulting amount to the recipient's primary account balance.


In another embodiment, the recipient decision determinator 506 is responsible for requesting the recipient's input for every payment received from any sender. If the recipient specifies that he accepts the payment and wants to convert it into a different currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 is responsible for invoking the conversion calculator 504, communicating information provided by the conversion calculator 504 to the recipient, and obtaining the recipient's final confirmation of the acceptance of the payment.


In one embodiment, the conversion calculator 504 also calculates an equivalent value in a recipient primary currency (or some other currency specified by the recipient) for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency. The equivalent value is also presented to the recipient. Hence, the recipient is provided with information that can assist him in determining whether the acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency and/or conversion of the sender-selected currency into a different currency would be beneficial for the recipient at the present time. In addition, in one embodiment, the recipient is provided with an opportunity to view the history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the recipient to compare the current terms with prior terms.


Once the recipient specifies his decision, the sender notifier 506 notifies the sender about the recipient's decision.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method 600 for processing receipts of online multi currency payments. The method 600 may be performed by processing logic, which may comprise hardware, software, or a combination of both. Processing logic may reside either in the online payment service 120, or partially or entirely in a separate device and/or system(s).


Referring to FIG. 6, the method 600 begins with processing logic communicating to a recipient via a communications network a notification of a sender payment in a sender-selected currency (processing block 602). At processing block 604, processing logic presents to the recipient via the communications network conversion data pertaining to a payment amount in the sender-selected currency. The conversion data may include an equivalent value in a recipient primary currency for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency. In one embodiment, the conversion data is communicated to the recipient if the recipient does not hold an account balance in the sender-selected currency. Alternatively, the conversion data is communicated to the recipient for every received payment.


In one embodiment, the notification about the sender payment and the conversion data is presented to the sender using a single user interface. In one embodiment, this user interface also allows the recipient to provide input for the recipient's decision with respect to an acceptance of the sender payment.


The presentation of the conversion data assists the recipient in determining which actions with respect to the payment in the sender-selected currency would be the most advantageous for the recipient at the present time. In one embodiment, the recipient may be also presented with a history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the recipient for comparison.


At processing block 606, processing logic receives from the recipient via the communications network data indicating the recipient's decision with respect to an acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency. In one embodiment, in which the recipient does not hold an account balance in the sender-selected currency, the recipient is provided with three decision options: (1) accept the payment and create a balance in the sender-selected currency within the recipient account, (2) accept the payment and convert it into the recipient's primary balance, and (3) deny the payment. If the recipient chooses the first option, processing logic requests a creation of a new balance within the recipient account and a transfer of the payment amount to this new balance. If the recipient chooses the second option, processing logic converts the payment amount into the recipient's primary balance and requests a transfer of the resulting amount to the recipient's primary balance.


In one embodiment, processing logic determines the recipient decision with respect to this payment based on payment receiving preferences previously provided by the recipient with respect to future payments in currencies for which the recipient does not hold a balance.


In one embodiment, processing logic assesses a receiving fee in the sender-selected currency if the recipient accepts the payment.


Afterwards, processing logic notifies the sender via the communications network of the recipient decision (processing block 608). In one embodiment, if the recipient denies the payment, processing logic presents to the sender a message offering the sender to select a different currency for the payment.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a user account manager 700. The user account manager 700 includes, in one embodiment, a currency balance manager 702, a conversion calculator 704, a transfer request processor 706, and a funds transferor 708.


The currency balance manager 702 is responsible for maintaining balances in different currencies within a user account, opening new balances when needed and closing existing balances when requested by a user.


The conversion calculator 704 is responsible for providing current exchange rates and calculating amounts of potential and actual transfers.


The transfer request processor 706 is responsible for transferring funds between different currency balances within a user account. Prior to performing a transfer, the transfer request processor 706 displays conversion data provided by the conversion calculator 704 and then requests the user to confirm the transfer.


The funds transferor 708 is responsible for performing the transfer.



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method 800 for managing multicurrency balances of a user. The method 800 may be performed by processing logic, which may comprise hardware, software, or a combination of both. Processing logic may reside either in the online payment service 120, or partially or entirely in a separate device and/or system(s).


Referring to FIG. 8, the method 800 begins with processing logic communicating to a recipient via a communications network information identifying a set of balances in different currencies within the user account (processing block 802). In one embodiment, the user is also presented with the combined total of all the balances in the user primary currency.


At processing block 804, processing logic receives from the user via the communications network data indicating a user desire to transfer funds between two currency balances. In response, processing logic presents to the user via the communications network data identifying a current exchange rate for conversion between currencies of the two balances (processing block 806).


Next, processing logic receives a user approval of the desired transfer (processing block 808) and performs the transfer (processing block 810).


As discussed above, a current exchange rate is periodically updated based on the rates obtained from a third party system. A third party may be a financial institution or any other organization that guarantees an exchange rate to the online payment service 120 during a predefined time interval. As a result, the online payment service 120 is not affected by any market fluctuations that may occur during this time interval and can provide its users with more up-to-date exchange rates.



FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method 900 for obtaining guaranteed exchange rates The method 900 may be performed by processing logic, which may comprise hardware, software, or a combination of both. Processing logic may reside either in the online payment service 120, or partially or entirely in a separate device and/or system(s).


Referring to FIG. 9, the method 900 begins with processing logic retrieving new exchange rates from a third party system (processing block 902). The new exchange rates have associated expiration dates and the online payment system is guaranteed the ability to trade against these rates within the specified window. In one embodiment, the new exchange rates are pulled via a client interface that interacts with a third party server. In one embodiment, the new exchange rates include a market exchange rate, a bid exchange rate and an ask exchange rate.


Next, processing logic applies a set of business rules to the new exchange rates (processing block 904). The set of business rules include a variety of checks (e.g., whether the new exchange rates have changed by more than 5% from the previous exchange rates) that are done to ensure that the rates are correct.


At decision box 906, processing logic determines whether the rates are correct. If not, processing logic generates an error message (processing block 908). If so, processing logic updates exchange rates currently stored in the live database of the online payment service with the new exchange rates (processing logic 910) and begins accumulating customer payment transactions in different currencies (processing block 912). When a predefined time period expires (decision box 914), processing logic requests the third party system to trade and settle the accumulated customer payment transactions (processing logic 916) and receives confirmation and summary reports once the trades are completed. In one embodiment, all transactions are funded and settled in a specific currency (e.g., U.S. dollars). In one embodiment, the trades are completed via a client interface that interacts with the third party server.



FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a method 1000 for facilitating multi currency payment transactions between participants of a network-based transaction facility. The method 900 may be performed by processing logic, which may comprise hardware, software, or a combination of both. Processing logic may reside either in the online payment service 120, or partially or entirely in a separate device and/or system(s).


Referring to FIG. 10, the method 1000 begins with processing logic presenting to a sender a user interface that facilitates sender input of a specific currency for a payment (processing block 1002). Next, processing logic determines whether the sender-selected currency is a sender primary currency (decision box 1004). If so, the method 1000 proceeds directly to decision box 1008. If not, processing logic displays a current exchange rate for conversion between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency and an equivalent value in the sender primary currency (processing block 1006) and requests the sender to confirm the payment.


If the sender confirms the payment (decision box 1008), processing logic notifies the recipient about the payment in the sender-selected currency and presents to the recipient an equivalent value in the recipients primary currency for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency (processing block 1010).


Utile recipient denies the payment (decision box 1012), processing logic presents to the sender a message offering the sender to select a different currency.


If the recipient accepts the payment, processing logic funds the payment using one or more payment instruments of the sender (processing block 1016). In one embodiment, if the sender has an account balance in the sender-selected currency, processing logic funds the payment using this account balance. If the sender does not have such account balance, processing logic funds the payment using the sender primary account balance. If the primary account balance does not cover the payment, processing logic may use a sender credit card, a sender bank account, or other account balances within the sender account to fund the payment.


Further, if the recipient accepts the payment, processing logic assesses a receiving fee in the sender-selected currency (processing block 1014) and determines whether the recipient holds an account balance in the sender-selected currency (decision box 1015). If so, processing logic adds the payment to this balance (processing block 1016). If not, processing logic determines whether the recipient requested conversion of the accepted payment into the recipient primary currency (decision box 1018). If so, processing logic performs the conversion (processing block 1020), shows transaction history for the conversion (processing block 1022), and transfers the payment amount to the primary balance.


If the recipient did not request conversion, processing logic creates a new currency balance (processing block 1024), transfers the payment amount to the new currency balance (processing block 1026), and presents a list of existing currency balances with the total amount value to the recipient (processing block 1028).


In one embodiment, if processing logic receives a request to return the payment to the sender, processing logic performs the return in the currency in which the payment was originated using an original exchange rate.


Functions of the online payment service 120 pertaining to multi currency payments will now be described within the context of user interfaces, according to one embodiment of the present invention. Exemplary representations of the various interfaces are shown in FIGS. 11-20. While the exemplary interfaces are described as comprising markup language documents displayed by a browser, it will be appreciated that the described interfaces could comprise user interfaces presented by any Windows® client application or stand-alone application, and need not necessarily comprise markup language documents.



FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary send money interface that enables a sender to specify which currency 1102 is to be used for a payment.



FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary check payment details interface that displays a current exchange rate 1204 for conversion between the sender-selected currency and a sender primary currency and an equivalent value 1202 in the sender primary currency. The user interface also includes a send money button 1206 requesting the sender to confirm the payment.



FIG. 13 is an exemplary receive money interface that notifies a recipient about the sender's payment and requests him to specify his decision with respect to the payment. The receive money interface presents to the recipient the payment amount 1304 in the sender-selected currency and an equivalent value 1302 in the recipient primary currency.



FIG. 14 is an exemplary account overview interface which is presented if the recipient chose to accept the payment in the sender-selected currency. Anew balance 1402 created in response to the recipient's acceptance is shown in the Balance box. The balance 1402 reflects an assessment of a receiving fee.



FIG. 15 is an exemplary transaction history interface that is presented in response to the recipient's request to accept the payment in the sender-selected currency and to convert it into the recipient primary currency. The transaction history includes 3 records: (1) the payment received in its original currency, (2) the conversion from the original currency, and (3) the conversion to the recipient's primary currency.



FIG. 16 is an exemplary payment receiving preferences interface that includes information 1602 specifying how the recipient wishes to handle payments that are sent in currencies that the recipient does not hold. As shown, the recipient can request that such payments be blocked, accepted and converted into a primary currency, or be asked about.



FIG. 17 is an exemplary account overview interface that identifies various currency balances within a user account and provides a total amount of all the balances in the primary currency.



FIG. 18 is an exemplary transfer funds interface that allows a user to transfer funds from one account balance to another. The transfer funds interface also presents a current exchange rate for the conversion, a resulting amount in the desired conversion, and a transfer button to confirm the transfer.



FIG. 19 is an exemplary manage currency interface that displays all the currency in which the user may maintain a balance, allows the user to open a new balance, remove an existing balance and make a certain balance primary.



FIG. 20 is an exemplary withdraw funds interface that allows a user to withdraw funds from any of his currency balances. Before completing the deposit, the funds are converted into the currency of the user bank account and the results are displayed to the user


In summary, it will be appreciated that the above described interfaces, and underlying technologies, provide a convenient vehicle for facilitating multicurrency payment transactions in a transaction facility.



FIG. 21 shows a diagrammatic representation of machine in the exemplary form of a computer system 2100 within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform anyone of the methodologies discussed above, may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine may comprise a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


The computer system 2100 includes a processor 2102, a main memory 2104 and a static memory 2106, which communicate with each other via a bus 2108. The computer system 2100 may further include a video display unit 2110 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 2100 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 2112 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 2114 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 2116, a signal generation device 2120 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 2122.


The disk drive unit 2116 includes a computer-readable medium 2124 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 2126 embodying anyone, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 2126 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 2104 and/or within the processor 2102. The software 2126 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 2122. For the purposes of this specification, the term “computer-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the computer and that cause the computer to perform anyone of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals.


Thus, a method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: providing options to a user to select a currency in which to make a payment from an account of the user, the options including a primary currency of the account of the user and a currency of a recipient, the primary currency of the account of the user and the currency of the recipient being different;receiving an indication of the selected currency in which to make the payment from the account of the user;determining, using a processor of a machine, whether the selected currency is the primary currency of the account of the user or the currency of the recipient;based on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient: causing conversion information to be presented to the user along with a request to confirm the payment in the currency of the recipient, andreceiving confirmation from the user to proceed with the payment in the currency of the recipient, andfunding the payment from the account of the user to the recipient in the selected currency, the funding comprising causing conversion of the payment to the selected currency using a current exchange rate, prior to an expiration time of the current exchange rate, based on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the conversion information to be presented comprises the currency exchange rate between the selected currency and the primary currency of the account.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating an equivalent value in the primary currency of the account, wherein the conversion information to be presented further comprises presenting the equivalent value in the primary currency of the account.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising causing a conversion of the primary currency within the account of the user to the currency of the recipient.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving an indication of acceptance or denial of the payment; andcommunicating the indication to the user.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising, in response to a denial of the payment, allowing the user to make the payment using a different payment method.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining if a balance of the account of the user is sufficient to cover the payment; andbased on the balance not being sufficient, requesting the user to provide an additional source of payment.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a user interface that facilitates input of the selected currency, the user interface including a list of available currencies.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the causing the conversion of the payment comprises: storing one or more payment transactions including the payment;determining that a determinable time period has expired, the determinable time period set to expire prior to the expiration time of the current exchange rate; andin response to the determining that the determinable time period has expired, sending instructions to a third party system to execute trades on the one or more payment transactions.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing a fee in the primary currency based on acceptance of the payment.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising, based on the selected currency being the primary currency, causing a conversion from the selected currency to the currency of the recipient after the payment is funded from the account of the user.
  • 12. A system comprising: at least one processor configured to provide options to a user to select a currency in which to make a payment from an account of the user, the options including a primary currency of the account of the user and a currency of a recipient, the primary currency of the account of the user and the currency of the recipient being different;receive an indication of the selected currency in which to make the payment from the account of the user;determine whether the selected currency is the primary currency of an account of the user or the currency of the recipient; andbased on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient: cause conversion information to be presented to the user along with a request to confirm the payment in the currency of the recipient, andreceive confirmation from the user to proceed with the payment in the currency of the recipient, andfund the payment from the account of the user to the recipient in the selected currency, the payment being funded by causing conversion of the payment to the selected currency using a current exchange rate, prior to an expiration time of the current exchange rate, based on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient.
  • 13. A tangible machine-readable storage medium in communication with at least one processor, the tangible machine-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor of a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising: providing options to a user to select a currency in which to make a payment from an account of the user, the options including a primary currency of the account of the user and a currency of a recipient, the primary currency of the account of the user and the currency of the recipient being different;receiving an indication of the selected currency in which to make the payment from the account of the user;determining whether the selected currency is the primary currency of the account of the user or the currency of the recipient; andbased on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient: causing conversion information to be presented to the user along with a request to confirm the payment in the currency of the recipient, andreceiving confirmation from the user to proceed with the payment in the currency of the recipient, andfunding the payment from the account of the user to the recipient in the selected currency, the funding comprising causing conversion of the payment to the selected currency using a current exchange rate, prior to an expiration time of the current exchange rate, based on the selected currency being the currency of the recipient.
  • 14. The tangible machine-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise calculating an equivalent value in the primary currency of the account, wherein the conversion information to be presented further comprises the equivalent value in the primary currency of the account.
  • 15. The tangible machine-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise: determining if a balance of the account of the user is sufficient to cover the payment; andbased on the balance not being sufficient, requesting the user to provide an additional source of payment.
  • 16. The tangible machine-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the causing the conversion of the payment comprises: storing one or more payment transactions including the payment;determining that a determinable time period has expired, the determinable time period set to expire prior to the expiration date of the current exchange rate; andin response to the determining that the determinable time period has expired, sending instructions to a third party system to execute trades on the one or more payment transactions.
  • 17. The tangible machine-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise assessing a fee in the primary currency based on acceptance of the payment.
  • 18. The tangible machine-readable storage medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise, based on the selected currency being the primary currency, causing a conversion from the selected currency to the currency of the recipient after the payment is funded from the account of the user.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/212,994, filed Aug. 18, 2011, entitled Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/818,935, filed Jun. 18, 2010, entitled “Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants of a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/608,525, filed Jun. 26, 2003, entitled “Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants of a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (278)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
3652795 Wolf et al. Mar 1972 A
4251867 Uchida et al. Feb 1981 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4766293 Boston Aug 1988 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4812628 Boston et al. Mar 1989 A
4823264 Deming Apr 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4833607 Dethloff May 1989 A
4837422 Dethloff et al. Jun 1989 A
4864516 Gaither et al. Sep 1989 A
4877947 Mori Oct 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
4949256 Humble Aug 1990 A
4968873 Dethloff et al. Nov 1990 A
4982346 Girouard et al. Jan 1991 A
5056019 Schultz et al. Oct 1991 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5076433 Howes Dec 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5128752 Von Kohorn Jul 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5202826 McCarthy Apr 1993 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5262942 Earle Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5287268 McCarthy Feb 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5369705 Bird et al. Nov 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5380991 Valencia Jan 1995 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5401946 Weinblatt Mar 1995 A
5418949 Suzuki May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5440634 Jones et al. Aug 1995 A
5442782 Malatesta et al. Aug 1995 A
5453601 Rosen Sep 1995 A
5455407 Rosen Oct 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5535276 Ganesan Jul 1996 A
5537314 Kanter Jul 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557518 Rosen Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
2301919 Sudia et al. Dec 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5638457 Deaton Jun 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5644721 Chung et al. Jul 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5659165 Jennings et al. Aug 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5671364 Turk Sep 1997 A
5687323 Hodroff Nov 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710886 Christensen et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715399 Bezos Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5724524 Hunt et al. Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5729594 Klingman Mar 1998 A
5734838 Robinson et al. Mar 1998 A
5740252 Minor et al. Apr 1998 A
5757917 Rose et al. May 1998 A
5761648 Golden et al. Jun 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5774553 Rosen Jun 1998 A
5774870 Storey Jun 1998 A
5778178 Arunachalam Jul 1998 A
5787402 Potter et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794210 Goldhaber et al. Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5806044 Powell Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5822737 Ogram Oct 1998 A
5826241 Stein et al. Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5855008 Goldhaber et al. Dec 1998 A
5857188 Douglas Jan 1999 A
5857201 Wright et al. Jan 1999 A
5857203 Kauffman et al. Jan 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5874412 Priebe et al. Feb 1999 A
5883620 Hobbs Mar 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5884277 Khosla Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5897621 Boesch et al. Apr 1999 A
5897622 Blinn et al. Apr 1999 A
5903874 Leonard et al. May 1999 A
5905974 Fraser et al. May 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5909544 Anderson et al. Jun 1999 A
5913203 Wong et al. Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5944790 Levy Aug 1999 A
5945652 Ohki Aug 1999 A
5953423 Rosen Sep 1999 A
5956694 Powell Sep 1999 A
5960409 Wexler Sep 1999 A
5963647 Downing et al. Oct 1999 A
5963917 Ogram Oct 1999 A
5963923 Garber Oct 1999 A
5969974 Vandenbelt et al. Oct 1999 A
5970469 Scroggie et al. Oct 1999 A
5971274 Milchman Oct 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5983196 Wendkos Nov 1999 A
5987500 Arunachalam Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
5999913 Goodwin, III Dec 1999 A
6009412 Storey Dec 1999 A
6014634 Scroggie et al. Jan 2000 A
6016955 De Rooij et al. Jan 2000 A
6018721 Aziz et al. Jan 2000 A
6029015 Ishiguro Feb 2000 A
6029141 Bezos et al. Feb 2000 A
6029150 Kravitz Feb 2000 A
6035280 Christensen Mar 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6039244 Finsterwald Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6047274 Johnson Apr 2000 A
6052670 Johnson Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6095410 Andersen et al. Aug 2000 A
6101485 Fortenberry et al. Aug 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6105001 Masi Aug 2000 A
6105008 Davis et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6119229 Martinez et al. Sep 2000 A
6122355 Strohl Sep 2000 A
6138107 Elgamal Oct 2000 A
6161082 Goldberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6173267 Cairns Jan 2001 B1
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199079 Gupta Mar 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6205433 Boesch et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212556 Arunachalam Apr 2001 B1
6237145 Narasimhan et al. May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246996 Stein et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266651 Woolston Jul 2001 B1
6266652 Godin et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269345 Riboud Jul 2001 B1
6278980 Wendkos Aug 2001 B1
6321208 Barnett et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321210 O'Brien et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330543 Kepecs Dec 2001 B1
6336009 Suzumi et al. Jan 2002 B1
6336099 Barnett et al. Jan 2002 B1
6386446 Himmel et al. May 2002 B1
6389427 Faulkner May 2002 B1
6401077 Godden et al. Jun 2002 B1
6460020 Pool et al. Oct 2002 B1
6490602 Kraemer et al. Dec 2002 B1
6523012 Glassman et al. Feb 2003 B1
6556975 Wittsche Apr 2003 B1
6571216 Garg et al. May 2003 B1
6574239 Dowling et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578012 Storey Jun 2003 B1
6594640 Postrel Jul 2003 B1
6598026 Ojha et al. Jul 2003 B1
6598028 Sullivan et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628307 Fair Sep 2003 B1
6643624 Philippe Nov 2003 B2
6721715 Nemzow Apr 2004 B2
6748367 Lee Jun 2004 B1
7206768 deGroeve et al. Apr 2007 B1
7398229 Budish Jul 2008 B2
7458507 Fillinger et al. Dec 2008 B2
7540408 Levine et al. Jun 2009 B2
7599857 Bishop et al. Oct 2009 B2
7644037 Ostrovsky Jan 2010 B1
7660740 Boone et al. Feb 2010 B2
7742985 Digrigoli et al. Jun 2010 B1
7801816 Alarcon-Luther et al. Sep 2010 B2
7856384 Kulasooriya et al. Dec 2010 B1
8055582 Digrigoli et al. Nov 2011 B2
8249990 Digrigoli et al. Aug 2012 B2
8266016 Boone et al. Sep 2012 B2
20010007099 Rau et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010009005 Godin et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010011241 Nemzow Aug 2001 A1
20010023407 Liyanearachchi et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010025265 Takayasu Sep 2001 A1
20010027436 Tenembaum Oct 2001 A1
20010029455 Chin et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032164 Kim Oct 2001 A1
20010032878 Tsiounis et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034694 Elias Oct 2001 A1
20010047308 Kaminsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049628 Icho Dec 2001 A1
20010049647 Sheehan et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002538 Ling Jan 2002 A1
20020013767 Katz Jan 2002 A1
20020013774 Morimoto Jan 2002 A1
20020026423 Maritzen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029339 Rowe Mar 2002 A1
20020038282 Montgomery Mar 2002 A1
20020040344 Preiser et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046157 Solomon Apr 2002 A1
20020049664 Hoffman et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020069134 Solomon Jun 2002 A1
20020069184 Tilly et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073015 Chan et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091580 Wang Jul 2002 A1
20020099656 Poh Wong Jul 2002 A1
20020111889 Buxton et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111907 Ling Aug 2002 A1
20020120548 Etkin Aug 2002 A1
20020120554 Vega Aug 2002 A1
20020147655 Say Oct 2002 A1
20020174031 Weiss Nov 2002 A1
20020174050 Eynard et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030014350 Duell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018885 Landsman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022719 Donald et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030050861 Martin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20040039692 Shields et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049423 Kawashima et al. Mar 2004 A1
20050021455 Webster Jan 2005 A1
20060015452 Kulasooriya et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060089897 Maas et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136301 Grovit Jun 2006 A1
20060294005 Drepak Dec 2006 A1
20070198391 Dreyer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070295903 Schwartz Dec 2007 A1
20080147479 Johnson Jun 2008 A1
20100131510 Boone et al. May 2010 A1
20100312695 Digrigoli et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110307384 Digrigoli et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120284304 Boone et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303529 Digrigoli et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130018738 Faires et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130117093 Oda et al. May 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
4308597 Aug 1993 DE
0251619 Jan 1988 EP
0254812 Feb 1988 EP
0542298 May 1993 EP
0590861 Apr 1994 EP
2658635 Aug 1991 FR
2261579 May 1993 GB
2296413 Jun 1996 GB
2001000469 Jan 2001 JP
2001319098 Nov 2001 JP
2001338179 Dec 2001 JP
2001357248 Dec 2001 JP
2002092390 Mar 2002 JP
2002109286 Apr 2002 JP
2002207898 Jul 2002 JP
9300266 Feb 1993 NL
WO-9116691 Oct 1991 WO
WO-9215174 Sep 1992 WO
WO-9512169 May 1995 WO
WO-9517711 Jun 1995 WO
WO-9633568 Oct 1996 WO
WO-9634356 Oct 1996 WO
WO-9636024 Nov 1996 WO
WO-9641315 Dec 1996 WO
WO-9704411 Feb 1997 WO
WO-9737315 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9743727 Nov 1997 WO
WO-9748078 Dec 1997 WO
WO-9809447 Mar 1998 WO
WO-9809447 Mar 1998 WO
WO-9960503 Nov 1999 WO
WO-9963461 Dec 1999 WO
WO-0058862 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0062231 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0079461 Dec 2000 WO
WO-0116815 Mar 2001 WO
WO-0129750 Apr 2001 WO
WO-0139059 May 2001 WO
WO-0152135 Jul 2001 WO
WO-0153929 Jul 2001 WO
WO-0171579 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0171580 Sep 2001 WO
WO-0173665 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0180111 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0182115 Nov 2001 WO
WO-0205179 Jan 2002 WO
WO-0231737 Apr 2002 WO
WO-0233618 Apr 2002 WO
WO-0248828 Jun 2002 WO
WO-02069101 Sep 2002 WO
WO-02097582 Dec 2002 WO
WO-03038560 May 2003 WO
WO-2004090666 Oct 2004 WO
WO-2004090666 Oct 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (204)
Entry
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 27, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 5, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 10, 2008 to Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 25, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Nov. 24, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 19, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 12, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 13, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 22, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Appeal Brief filed Jul. 27, 2010”, 27 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed May 27, 2010”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2009”, 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2010”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 15, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 3, 2003”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Reply Brief filed Dec. 28, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Mar. 6, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed May 7, 2009 to Advisory Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Sep. 26, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Nov. 6, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 2, 2008”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 9, 2009”, 27 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Decision on Appeals mailed Jan. 11, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Examiners Answer received Feb. 4, 2010 to Appeal Brief filed Dec. 9, 2009”, 29 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012”, 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 22 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2007”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2008”, 31 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Sep. 23, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Feb. 28, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2007”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Mar. 12, 2012 to Decision on Appeal mailed Jan. 11, 2012 and to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Mar. 19, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Jun. 19, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Aug. 15, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Aug. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Oct. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 8, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 29, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Sep. 12, 2008”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Nov. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2008”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 8, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Sep. 28, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Jul. 31, 2008”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Jan. 11, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2007”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Mar. 16, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Jul. 1, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Aug. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Oct. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 13, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Advisory Action mailed Oct. 21, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Oct. 3, 2012”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Dec. 6, 2010”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Final Office Action mailed May 23, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Nov. 5, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed Aug. 23, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Feb. 2, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2011”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Jun. 11, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Jul. 23, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2012”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Oct. 5, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275 , Response filed Mar. 19, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Non Final Office Action Mailed Dec. 30, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Notice of Allowance mailed May 8, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Notice of Allowance mailed May 5, 2011”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 5, 2011”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Response filed Feb. 17, 2010 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2011”, (Dec. 15, 2011), 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Notice of Allowance mailed May 7, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 4, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Response filed Mar. 8, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2011”, 7 pgs.
“BarterBee.com: Buy, Sell, Why Points?”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/xmain0003/?—hp=trade>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 1 pg.
“BarterBee.com: Help & FAQ”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/xmain0005/?—hp=faq—4—requesting>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs.
“BarterBee.com: Points Q & A”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/smain0003/?—hp=point>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 1 pg.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 19, 2011”, with English translation of claims, 14 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 18 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 12 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Response filed Jun. 28, 2010 to Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 16 pgs.
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Response filed Dec. 23, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 15 pgs.
“Ebay—Your Personal Trading Community”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991007062815/www.ebay.com>, (Oct. 1999), 23 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Office Action mailed May 15, 2007”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Response filed Nov. 23, 2007 to Office Action mailed May 15, 2007”, 23 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Jul. 13, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/23854, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Aug. 19, 2002”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/23854, International Search Report mailed Dec. 28, 2001”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US04/10084, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 17, 2005”, 18 pgs.
“New eBay-like auction software released”, Business Wire, Business Editors/High-Tech Writers; Business Wire; New York, (Mar. 17, 1999), 2 pgs.
“OED Online Main entry text Frame”, [Online]. <URL: http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry—main/50218727?query—type=word&queryword=select&first=1&max—to show+10&sort at Http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry—main/50218727?query—type=word&queryword=approve&first=1&max—to show+10&sort>, (Accessed Apr. 14, 2008), 8 pgs.
“Peerflix: How it Works”, Copyright © 2004-2006 Peerflix, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.peerflix.com/Default.aspx?tabid=64>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs.
“Peerflix: Netflix, Blockbuster and Peerflix: Compare Online DVD Rentals vs. Buying vs. Trading”, Copyright © 2004-2006 Peerflix, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.peerflix.com/Default.aspx?tabid=171>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs.
“PSINet Teams with WorldPay Ltd. to Launch the World's First Secure Multi-Currency Solution for International Electronic Commerce”, PR Newswire Association, (Oct. 6, 1997), 3 pgs.
“RSA signs deal with China”, Internet Week, 2(7), (Feb. 12, 1996), 2 pgs.
“Yahoo Homepage”, Internet Archive Wayback Machine, http://web.archive.org/web/19991003015603/http://www.yahoo.com/index.html, (Oct. 3, 1999), 1 p.
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Afghanistan”, Copyright © 1994-97 Yahoo! Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20060921181441/http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/countries/afghanistan>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 1 pg.
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Sweden”, Copyright © 1994-97 Yahoo! Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19970616194441/www.yahoo.com/Regional/Countries/Sweden/>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 2 pgs.
“Yahoo! Auctions Celebrates One-Year Anniversary; As Online Auction Usage Continues to Grow, Yahoo! Is Quickly Becoming the World Marketplace of the New Millennium”, Business Wire, (Sep. 14, 1999), 3 pages.
Akin, David, “Web retailing gains market muscle as concerns fade: Record season: Increasing number of sites catering for Canadian dollars”, Financial Post, p04, XP002905105, (Dec. 26, 1998), 3 pages.
Asbrand, Deborah, “Taking Stock in Trading Exchanges”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.reed-electronics.com/eb-mag/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA42124>, (Apr. 1, 2000), 5 pgs.
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Jan. 1995), 83-84.
Bers, Joanna Smith, “Cyberspace: The new promised land”, Bank Systems & Technology, 32(7), (Jul. 1995), 32-37.
Bidnbuy, “Going, going, virtually gone . . . ”, Business and Finance Dialog File 20#06012646, (Jun. 17,1999), 3 pgs.
Business Wire, “Subasta.com Enters Into Strategic Partnership with From2.com”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 43206061, (Jul. 16, 1999), 2 pages.
Business Wire, “Yahoo! Launches Three New European Auctions Services; Yahoo! Italy, Yahoo! Spain and Yahoo! Sweden Unveil New Local Auctions”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45061209, (Sep. 23, 1999), 3 pages.
Chan, H. C., et al., “Design and implementation of a mobile agent-based auction system”, Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2001. PACRIM. 2001 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference, vol. 2, (Aug. 26-28, 2001), 740-743.
Chapman, Robert L, et al., “Roget's International thesaurus fourth edition”, sec 637, Thomas Y Crowell, Publishers New York, (1977), 3 pgs.
Chen, Jian, “Bidder's strategy under group-buying auction on the Interne”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 32 Issue: 6, (Nov. 2002), 680-690.
Clemons, E., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-61.
Cohen, Jackie, “Citibank's Bid to Be the King of Cash (Citibank unveils Electronic Monetary System prototype, a digital currency system capable of replacing all current monetary systems)”, Bank Technology News, 9(9), (Sep. 1996), p. 9+.
Cooper, C., et al., “Playing Catch-Up: U.S. Web Firms Get Slow Start in Europe, Amid Crowded Field—Used to Being First and Best at Home, They Stumble in World's No. 2 Market—Pouncing on Amazon Delays”, Wall Street Journal Europe, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46338867, (Nov. 15, 1999), 5 pages.
Creed, Adam, “Haggling Online In The Philippines—Magtawaran Auction site—Company Business and Marketing—Brief Article”, Newsbytes News Network, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—m0NEW/is—2000—May—1/ai—61859593, (May 1, 2000), Web Page.
Dalton, Gary, “Going, Going, Gone!—E-commerce is leading to an anything-goes environment of online bidding and dynamic pricing”, Information Week, http://www.informationweek.com/755/auction.htm, (Oct. 4, 1999), 4 pages.
Davidow, Emily, “The dynamics of pricing”, Home Textiles Today, (Feb. 2000), p. 42.
Edwards, Mark, “Your Web Browser is Bugged”, Windows IT Pro, http://www.windowsitpro.com/WindowsSecurity/Article/ArticleID/9543/WindowsSecurity—9543.html, (Jul. 13, 2000), 3 pages.
Edwards, Morris, “New B2B player spreads benefits of e-commerce”, Communications News, (Jan. 2001), 4 pages.
Fisher, Dennis, “More Goods on the Block”, EWeek, (Dec. 2000), 4 pages.
Franse, Karen, “Distribution Briefs—Are Auctions in Vogue?”, VARBusiness, http://www.varbusiness.com/sections/strategy/strategy.jhtml?articleId=18828086, (Mar. 11, 2002), 2 pgs.
Goldsborough, Reid, “Internet Auctions Examined”, Link-Up, 17, (Nov./Dec. 2000), p. 24.
Goldstein, D E, “Medical E-procurement-navigating in a B2B Market”, Health Management Technology, 21(8), (Aug. 2000), 30-6.
Graham, Ian, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Electronic Markets. vol. 8, No. 2, (1998), 1-4.
Greengard, Samuel, “What Traffic Will Bear”, BusinessFinanceMag.com, http://www.businessfinancemag.com/magazine/archives/article.html?articleID=13725, (Mar. 2001), 4 pages.
Gupta, Pankaj, “Most Flexible FF?”, Google Groups, (Oct. 29, 1996), 2 pages.
Hess, C. M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-274.
Jaroneczyk, Jennifer, “Sold on an Old Idea”, Internet World Magazine, (Feb. 15, 2001), 3 pages.
Kalin, Sari, “Mar. 2001”, Darwin Magazine, http://www.darwinmag.com/read/040101/low.html, (Apr. 2001), 5 pages.
Klein, Stefan, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 1-4.
Kumar, Manoj, et al., “Sales Promotions on the Internet”, Proceedings of the Usenix Conference on E-commerce, (1998), 1-11.
Lassila, Ora, “Web metadata; A Matter of Semantics”, IEEE Internet Computing, v2i4pg30 Proquest #1424143061, (1998), 15 pgs.
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406.
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 24-28.
Lee, Pui-Mun, et al., “Considering exchange rate movements in economic evaluation of foreign direct investments”, Engineering Economist, 40(2), (Winter, 1995), 171-199.
Lindsay, Jeff, et al., “The Historic Use of Computerized Tools for Marketing and Market Research: A Brief Survey”, Published as Document 6359D at IP.com, (Dec. 27, 2001), 20 pages.
M2 Presswire, “HP completes online strategy with launch of e-commerce site”, Proquest#43225990, (Jun. 29, 1999), 3 pgs.
M2 Presswire, “United Technologies: UTC's Carrier Corp. teams with FreeMarkets to create largest Asian-based B2B online auction market to date; UTC Division identifies average annual savings of more than 16 percent on electric motors through FreeMarkets B2B eMarketpla”, M2 Presswire, (Mar. 22, 2000), 2 pages.
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, 14(25), (Jun. 1987), 484-497.
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps.
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50.
McClenahen, John, “Net Gains”, Industry Week, Cleveland. vol. 248, Iss. 10, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=O&did=41808971&SrchMode= l&sid=5&Fmt=4& V . . . >, (May 17, 1999), p. 51.
McDougall, Bruce, “Electronic evolution”, Canadian Banker, 102(5), (Sep.-Oct. 1995), p. 28(6).
McKendrick, Joseph, “Old Economy Players Step Up”, EC World, (Nov. 2000), 35-44.
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs.
Merlino, Laurel, “Auction Anxiety”, Upside Today, (Oct. 2000), 247-251.
Mitchell, Lori, “BayBuilder delivers easy, profitable reverse auctions”, Infoworld, http://www.infoworld.com/articles/eu/xml/00/06/05/000605eubaybuilder.html, (Jun. 2, 2000), 6 pages.
Mollison, Caitlin, “America West Airlines opt for reverse auctions”, Internet World, 8(4), (Apr. 1, 2002), 42(3).
Mollman, Steve, “Are you ready to bicker over the price of that sandwich? In the new economy you won't pay retail for anything.”, PC/Computing, (Jan. 1, 2000), 8-10.
Morgan, Lisa, “Pick Your Lot: Build consumer-oriented auctions with AuctionBuilder”, Internet Week, (Sep. 18, 2000), 4 pages.
Neo, B. S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288.
Ohlson, Kathleen, “Looking behind, beyond B2B marketplace woes”, Network World Fusion, http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2001/119669—06-11-2001.html, (Jun. 11, 2001), 4 pages.
Patel, Jeetu, et al., “New Platform Options Fuel E-Commerce”, Information Week,, http://www.informationweek.com/779/ecommerce.htm, (Mar. 27, 2000), 3 Pages.
Piccinelli, G, et al., “e-service composition: supporting dynamic definition of process-oriented negotiation parameters”, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2001. Proceedings., (Sep. 3-7 , 2001), 727-731.
Pollick, M., “Sold! on eBay: As antique and collectible dealers see their sales increase through online auctions such as eBay, more of them are deciding that the internet is not something to be afraid of”, Sarasota Herald Tribune, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45499060, (Oct. 11, 1999), 8 pages.
Post, D. L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584.
PR Newswire Europe Ltd., “Mitsubishi Venture, Wells Fargo Partner to Offer Multi-Currency E-Commerce Storefront”, PR Newswire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 39345965, (Mar. 1, 1999), 3 pages.
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1999), 11-18.
Pressler, Margaret, “Sells on eBay; Housewife finds herself head of multinational software firm”, Washington Post, Proquest # 44484325, (Sep. 5, 1999), 3 pgs.
Queree, Anne, “Bid it Out”, Global Finance, (Jan. 2000), 36-37.
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 17-23.
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48.
Rockoff, T. E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16.
Schmid, B. F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs.
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3.
Strassmann, Paul, “The Impact of B2B”, Computerworld, (Oct. 2, 2000), 3 pages.
Tapscott, D., “eBay endagners traditional papers auctioneer can pack far more punch in your sales pitch”, National Post, Proquest# 54945579, (Oct. 9, 1999), 3 pgs.
Tjostheim, Ingvar, et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.nr.no/˜ingvar/enter98.html>, (Accessed Feb. 21, 2005), 1-10.
Turban, Efraim, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, EM—Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 7-11.
Turek, Norbert, “Online Portals Offer Bandwidth and Voice Services”, Information Week, http://www.informationweek.com/784/bandwidth.htm, (May 1, 2000), 4 pages.
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, (1996), 6 pgs.
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-15.
Weiss, Scott, “Pan-Am FF Program”, Google Groups, (Oct. 16, 1996), 3 pages.
Wilson, D., “Going . . . Going . . . Gone!Bargain-hunters and collectors can scour auctions from home via the internet”, The Gazette, Proquest #4116732, (Apr. 27, 1999), 4 pgs.
Wilson, T., “Act Globally, Think Locally”, InternetWeek, Issue 789, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46352181, (Nov. 15, 1999), 4 p.
Wilson, Tim, “B2B Sellers Fight Back on Pricing”, InternetWeek.com, http://www.internetweek.com/lead/lead121200.htm, (Dec. 12, 2000), 3 pages.
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Sep. 6, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Appeal Decision mailed May 31, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 3, 2013”, 30 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Examiner's Answer mailed May 10, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Reply Brief filed Jul. 10, 2013 in response to Examiner's Answer mailed May 10, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Response filed Jun. 24, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606 , Response filed May 17, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013”, 10 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120303529 A1 Nov 2012 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13212994 Aug 2011 US
Child 13567902 US
Parent 12818935 Jun 2010 US
Child 13212994 US
Parent 10608525 Jun 2003 US
Child 12818935 US