The present invention relates generally to the field of e-commerce and, more specifically, to facilitating payment transactions in multiple currencies between participants.
Typically, an electronic payment system allows participants of a network-based transaction facility to collect payments online. For example, the payer may send money to the electronic payment system using a credit card or check, or funds in a payer account maintained by the electronic payment system. Recipients can store money in their accounts maintained by the electronic payment system, transfer the money to a separate bank account or have the electronic payment system cut them a check.
With the growth in international commerce, problems arise due to different monetary systems used in different countries. That is, money is generally expressed in different currencies in different countries and the value of the different currencies varies greatly.
Currency conversion is widely used to convert money from one currency into money of a different currency. However, currency conversion represents a significant economic risk to both buyers and sellers in international commerce. For example, when a buyer in the U.S. desires to buy a product in an online transaction facility from a seller in France, the buyer may use a credit card to pay the seller for the product. The credit card company may pay the seller in Euros, and then at an undetermined later date, it will bill an amount to the buyer in U.S. dollars. The amount billed to the buyer is determined by an exchange rate used at the time the credit card company settles the transaction. The time of this settlement is at the credit card company's discretion. The risk to the credit card company is minimal because the credit card company can settle the transaction when exchange rates are favorable. Thus, in this case, it is the buyer who bears the risk that the value of the buyer's currency wilt decline prior to this settlement.
In another example, a seller participating in an online transaction facility may decide to accept a different currency to be able to sell the product. In this case, the seller may later sell the currency to a currency trader, usually at a discount. The price the seller charges to the buyer who pays cash reflects both the cost of currency conversion and the risk that the rate used to establish the price of the product in a particular currency may have changed. This typically results in the buyer paying a higher price for the product and the seller incurring risk due to a possible change in currency exchange rates.
In yet another example, a buyer may convert from the native currency to a different second currency before the sale to be able to buy a product from a seller who only accepts payments in the second currency. In this case, the buyer can purchase goods at a price in the second currency, but cannot be certain of the value of the second currency relative to the buyer's native currency. Thus, the individual assumes the risk of devaluation of the second currency against the first currency. Further, the buyer bears the risk that the second currency may cease to be convertible into his native currency.
The above problems create inconvenience and uncertainty for participants in international commerce, thus discouraging the development of international commerce over electronic networks.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
A method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in multiple currencies between users over a communications network are described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
System for Processing Online Payment Transactions
The client 100 represents a device that allows a user to participate in a transaction facility 130. The transaction facility 130 handles all transactions between various participants including the user of the client computer 100. In one embodiment, the transaction facility 130 may be an online auction facility represented by an auction web site visited by various participants including the user of the client computer 100. Alternatively, the transaction facility 130 may be an online retailer or wholesaler facility represented by a retailer or wholesaler web site visited by various buyers including the user of the client computer 100. In yet other embodiments, the transactions facility 130 may be any other online environment used by a participant to conduct business transactions.
The transaction facility 130 is coupled to an online payment service 120. In one embodiment, the transaction facility 130 is coupled to the online payment service 120 via a communications network such as, for example, an internal network, the wide area network 110, a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network. Alternatively, the online payment service 120 is integrated with the transaction facility 130 and it is a part of the transaction facility 130. The online payment service 120 is also coupled to the client 100 via any of the described above communications networks. The online payment service 120 is a service for enabling online payment transactions between participants of the transaction facility 130, including the user of the client computer 100.
In one embodiment, the online payment service 120 includes a multi-currency transfer module 150 that allows the participants to maintain account balances in different currencies and make online payments in different currencies in the course of business conducted in the transaction facility 130. The term “currency” as referred to herein may include, for example, denominations of script and coin that are issued by government authorities as a medium of exchange. In another example, a “currency” may also include a privately issued token that can be exchanged for another privately issued token or government script. For example, a company might create tokens in various denominations. This company issued “money” could be used by employees to purchase goods from sellers. In this case, an exchange rate might be provided to convert the company currency into currencies which are acceptable to merchants.
As will be discussed in more detail below, in one embodiment, the multi currency transfer module 150 allows the participants to make educated decisions as to which currency to choose for sending and receiving payments. In another embodiment, the multi currency module 150 provides the participants with a mechanism for managing their account balances in different currencies.
In one embodiment, the send payment sub-module 202 is responsible for facilitating a sender selection of a currency in which a payment to a recipient is to be made, for funding the payment, for notifying a recipient about the payment, and for handling returned or denied payments. In one embodiment, if the sender does not hold an account balance in the currency that he or she selects for the payment, the send payment sub-module 202 is responsible for automatically converting funds from an existing sender balance in a different currency into the selected currency.
In one embodiment, the receive payment sub-module 204 is responsible for assisting a recipient in making a decision with respect to an acceptance of a sender payment in a specific currency, for converting the sender payment into a different currency if needed, and for notifying the sender about the recipient's decision.
In one embodiment, the user account manager 206 is responsible for allowing users to hold account balances in different currencies, for opening/removing currency balances within user accounts, and for performing transfers of funds between different currency balances within a user account.
In one embodiment, the rate controller 208 is responsible for periodically obtaining exchange rates from a third party system and using these rates to refresh rates stored in a database of the online payments service.
In one embodiment, the multi currency transfer module 200 also includes a request money sub-module that allows users to request money in any currency using a request money user interface with a list of currencies for user selection.
In one embodiment, the multicurrency transfer module 200 also includes a withdraw funds sub-module that allows users to withdraw money from any currency balance to a user bank account. If the withdrawal requires conversion, the relevant conversion data is presented to the user and the user is requested to confirm the final withdrawal.
The transaction information receiver 302 is responsible for communicating to a sender a user interface that facilitates user input of transaction information such as a recipient identifier (e.g., a recipient email address), a payment amount, a currency to be used for the payment, etc. In one embodiment, the user interface presents to the sender a list of currencies supported by the online payment system (e.g., U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros, pounds sterling, yen, etc.) and the sender is asked to select a specific currency from the list. The transaction information receiver 302 is further responsible for receiving transaction information entered by the sender via the user interface.
In one embodiment, if the currency selected by the sender for the payment is not a sender primary currency, the conversion calculator 304 is invoked. In another embodiment, the conversion calculator 304 is invoked only if the sender does not hold an account balance in the selected currency. Once invoked, the conversion calculator 304 is responsible for providing a current exchange rate between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency and for calculating an equivalent value in the sender primary currency for the payment amount. The primary currency may be, for example, a currency used in the majority of payment transactions that involved the sender. In another example, the primary currency is a currency that was specifically identified by the sender as primary. In yet another example, the primary currency may be a currency of a country in which the sender resides or a default currency provided by the online payment service 120.
The transaction information receiver 302 displays to the sender the conversion information provided by the conversion calculator 304 and requests the sender to confirm the payment in the selected currency. Once the sender sees the conversion information, the sender may decide that the current exchange rate for the selected currency is not favorable and select another currency. Alternatively, the sender may consider the current exchange rate as favorable and confirm the payment in the selected currency. In one embodiment, the sender may request, prior to confirming the payment, to view the history of currency conversion calculations from the sender's previous payment transactions to decide whether the current exchange rate is favorable.
The recipient communicator 308 is responsible for informing the recipient about the sender's payment in the selected currency, receiving data indicating whether the recipient decides to accept the payment in this currency, and communicating the recipient's decision to the sender. In one embodiment, if the recipient decides to deny the payment, the recipient communicator 308 displays to the sender a message offering to select a different currency.
The sender funds analyzer 306 is responsible for analyzing the sender's funds and determining how to fund the payment in the sender-selected currency. In one embodiment, if the sender holds an account balance in the selected currency, the sender funds analyzer 306 uses this account balance to fund the payment. Alternatively, if the sender does not hold an account balance in the selected currency, the sender funds analyzer 306 may use an account balance in the sender's primary currency to fund the payment. If the funds in the sender's primary balance are not enough to cover the payment, the sender funds analyzer 306 may ask the sender to specify an additional source for funding. This additional source may be, for example, a sender credit card, a sender bank account, a sender balance other then the primary balance, etc. In one embodiment, the sender is presented with relevant conversion information before requesting the sender's confirmation of any conversion that is necessary to fund the payment.
Referring to
At processing block 404, processing logic receives data identifying the sender-selected currency from the sender via the communications network. In response, in one embodiment, processing logic determines whether the sender-selected currency is the sender's primary currency. If it is not, processing logic determines the current exchange rate for conversion between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency. In another embodiment, processing logic determines the current exchange rate only if the sender does not hold an account in the sender-selected currency.
Next, processing logic communicates to the sender via the communications network the current exchange rate for the conversion between the sender-selected currency and the sender primary currency (processing block 406). In one embodiment, processing logic also presents to the sender an equivalent value in the sender primary currency for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency. The presentation of the current conversion information (e.g., the exchange rate and the equivalent value) assist the sender in determining whether the terms for converting into the sender-selected currency are favorable at the present time. In addition, in one embodiment, the sender is provided with an opportunity to view the history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the sender to compare the current terms with prior terms.
Further, if processing logic receives from the sender a confirmation of the payment in the sender-selected currency (decision box 408), processing logic notifies the recipient about the payment in the sender selected currency (processing block 410).
The transaction information receiver 302 is responsible for receiving information about a sender's payment and communicating it to the recipient. The information about the sender payment may include, for example, the identifier of the sender (e.g., sender's name or email address), the payment amount, the sender-selected currency of the payment, etc.
In one embodiment, the transaction information receiver 502 is also responsible for determining whether the recipient holds an account balance in the sender-selected currency. If so, the transaction information receiver 502 is responsible for requesting a transfer of the payment amount to this account balance. If the recipient does not hold an account balance in the sender-selected currency, the conversion calculator 504 is invoked to provide a current exchange rate between the sender-selected currency and the recipient primary currency, and then the recipient decision determinator 506 communicates the current exchange rate to the recipient and requests the recipient's input with respect to an acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency. If the recipient accepts the payment in the sender-selected currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 requests to open a balance in the sender-selected currency within the recipient account. Alternatively, if the recipient accepts the payment in the sender-selected currency but also asks to convert it into the primary currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 performs the conversion and requests the addition of the resulting amount to the recipient's primary account balance.
In another embodiment, the recipient decision determinator 506 is responsible for requesting the recipient's input for every payment received from any sender. If the recipient specifies that he accepts the payment and wants to convert it into a different currency, the recipient decision determinator 506 is responsible for invoking the conversion calculator 504, communicating information provided by the conversion calculator 504 to the recipient, and obtaining the recipient's final confirmation of the acceptance of the payment.
In one embodiment, the conversion calculator 504 also calculates an equivalent value in a recipient primary currency (or some other currency specified by the recipient) for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency. The equivalent value is also presented to the recipient. Hence, the recipient is provided with information that can assist him in determining whether the acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency and/or conversion of the sender-selected currency into a different currency would be beneficial for the recipient at the present time. In addition, in one embodiment, the recipient is provided with an opportunity to view the history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the recipient to compare the current terms with prior terms.
Once the recipient specifies his decision, the sender notifier 506 notifies the sender about the recipient's decision.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the notification about the sender payment and the conversion data is presented to the sender using a single user interface. In one embodiment, this user interface also allows the recipient to provide input for the recipient's decision with respect to an acceptance of the sender payment.
The presentation of the conversion data assists the recipient in determining which actions with respect to the payment in the sender-selected currency would be the most advantageous for the recipient at the present time. In one embodiment, the recipient may be also presented with a history of currency conversion calculations from previous transactions involving the recipient for comparison.
At processing block 606, processing logic receives from the recipient via the communications network data indicating the recipient's decision with respect to an acceptance of the payment in the sender-selected currency. In one embodiment, in which the recipient does not hold an account balance in the sender-selected currency, the recipient is provided with three decision options: (1) accept the payment and create a balance in the sender-selected currency within the recipient account, (2) accept the payment and convert it into the recipient's primary balance, and (3) deny the payment. If the recipient chooses the first option, processing logic requests a creation of a new balance within the recipient account and a transfer of the payment amount to this new balance. If the recipient chooses the second option, processing logic converts the payment amount into the recipient's primary balance and requests a transfer of the resulting amount to the recipient's primary balance.
In one embodiment, processing logic determines the recipient decision with respect to this payment based on payment receiving preferences previously provided by the recipient with respect to future payments in currencies for which the recipient does not hold a balance.
In one embodiment, processing logic assesses a receiving fee in the sender-selected currency if the recipient accepts the payment.
Afterwards, processing logic notifies the sender via the communications network of the recipient decision (processing block 608). In one embodiment, if the recipient denies the payment, processing logic presents to the sender a message offering the sender to select a different currency for the payment.
The currency balance manager 702 is responsible for maintaining balances in different currencies within a user account, opening new balances when needed and closing existing balances when requested by a user.
The conversion calculator 704 is responsible for providing current exchange rates and calculating amounts of potential and actual transfers.
The transfer request processor 706 is responsible for transferring funds between different currency balances within a user account. Prior to performing a transfer, the transfer request processor 706 displays conversion data provided by the conversion calculator 704 and then requests the user to confirm the transfer.
The funds transferor 708 is responsible for performing the transfer.
Referring to
At processing block 804, processing logic receives from the user via the communications network data indicating a user desire to transfer funds between two currency balances. In response, processing logic presents to the user via the communications network data identifying a current exchange rate for conversion between currencies of the two balances (processing block 806).
Next, processing logic receives a user approval of the desired transfer (processing block 808) and performs the transfer (processing block 810).
As discussed above, a current exchange rate is periodically updated based on the rates obtained from a third party system. A third party may be a financial institution or any other organization that guarantees an exchange rate to the online payment service 120 during a predefined time interval. As a result, the online payment service 120 is not affected by any market fluctuations that may occur during this time interval and can provide its users with more up-to-date exchange rates.
Referring to
Next, processing logic applies a set of business rules to the new exchange rates (processing block 904). The set of business rules include a variety of checks (e.g., whether the new exchange rates have changed by more than 5% from the previous exchange rates) that are done to ensure that the rates are correct.
At decision box 906, processing logic determines whether the rates are correct. If not, processing logic generates an error message (processing block 908). If so, processing logic updates exchange rates currently stored in the live database of the online payment service with the new exchange rates (processing logic 910) and begins accumulating customer payment transactions in different currencies (processing block 912). When a predefined time period expires (decision box 914), processing logic requests the third party system to trade and settle the accumulated customer payment transactions (processing logic 916) and receives confirmation and summary reports once the trades are completed. In one embodiment, all transactions are funded and settled in a specific currency (e.g., U.S. dollars). In one embodiment, the trades are completed via a client interface that interacts with the third party server.
Referring to
If the sender confirms the payment (decision box 1008), processing logic notifies the recipient about the payment in the sender-selected currency and presents to the recipient an equivalent value in the recipients primary currency for the payment amount in the sender-selected currency (processing block 1010).
Utile recipient denies the payment (decision box 1012), processing logic presents to the sender a message offering the sender to select a different currency.
If the recipient accepts the payment, processing logic funds the payment using one or more payment instruments of the sender (processing block 1016). In one embodiment, if the sender has an account balance in the sender-selected currency, processing logic funds the payment using this account balance. If the sender does not have such account balance, processing logic funds the payment using the sender primary account balance. If the primary account balance does not cover the payment, processing logic may use a sender credit card, a sender bank account, or other account balances within the sender account to fund the payment.
Further, if the recipient accepts the payment, processing logic assesses a receiving fee in the sender-selected currency (processing block 1014) and determines whether the recipient holds an account balance in the sender-selected currency (decision box 1015). If so, processing logic adds the payment to this balance (processing block 1016). If not, processing logic determines whether the recipient requested conversion of the accepted payment into the recipient primary currency (decision box 1018). If so, processing logic performs the conversion (processing block 1020), shows transaction history for the conversion (processing block 1022), and transfers the payment amount to the primary balance.
If the recipient did not request conversion, processing logic creates a new currency balance (processing block 1024), transfers the payment amount to the new currency balance (processing block 1026), and presents a list of existing currency balances with the total amount value to the recipient (processing block 1028).
In one embodiment, if processing logic receives a request to return the payment to the sender, processing logic performs the return in the currency in which the payment was originated using an original exchange rate.
Functions of the online payment service 120 pertaining to multi currency payments will now be described within the context of user interfaces, according to one embodiment of the present invention. Exemplary representations of the various interfaces are shown in
In summary, it will be appreciated that the above described interfaces, and underlying technologies, provide a convenient vehicle for facilitating multicurrency payment transactions in a transaction facility.
The computer system 2100 includes a processor 2102, a main memory 2104 and a static memory 2106, which communicate with each other via a bus 2108. The computer system 2100 may further include a video display unit 2110 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 2100 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 2112 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 2114 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 2116, a signal generation device 2120 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 2122.
The disk drive unit 2116 includes a computer-readable medium 2124 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 2126 embodying anyone, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 2126 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 2104 and/or within the processor 2102. The software 2126 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 2122. For the purposes of this specification, the term “computer-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the computer and that cause the computer to perform anyone of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals.
Thus, a method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/212,994, filed Aug. 18, 2011, entitled Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/818,935, filed Jun. 18, 2010, entitled “Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants of a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/608,525, filed Jun. 26, 2003, entitled “Multi Currency Exchanges Between Participants of a Network-Based Transaction Facility,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
3652795 | Wolf et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
4251867 | Uchida et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4766293 | Boston | Aug 1988 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812628 | Boston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4823264 | Deming | Apr 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4833607 | Dethloff | May 1989 | A |
4837422 | Dethloff et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4864516 | Gaither et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4877947 | Mori | Oct 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
4949256 | Humble | Aug 1990 | A |
4968873 | Dethloff et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4982346 | Girouard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5056019 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076433 | Howes | Dec 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5202826 | McCarthy | Apr 1993 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262942 | Earle | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287268 | McCarthy | Feb 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5369705 | Bird et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380991 | Valencia | Jan 1995 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5401946 | Weinblatt | Mar 1995 | A |
5418949 | Suzuki | May 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5440634 | Jones et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442782 | Malatesta et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453601 | Rosen | Sep 1995 | A |
5455407 | Rosen | Oct 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5535276 | Ganesan | Jul 1996 | A |
5537314 | Kanter | Jul 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557518 | Rosen | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
2301919 | Sudia et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638457 | Deaton | Jun 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644721 | Chung et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5659165 | Jennings et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5671364 | Turk | Sep 1997 | A |
5687323 | Hodroff | Nov 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710886 | Christensen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715399 | Bezos | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5724524 | Hunt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729594 | Klingman | Mar 1998 | A |
5734838 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740252 | Minor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757917 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761648 | Golden et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774553 | Rosen | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5778178 | Arunachalam | Jul 1998 | A |
5787402 | Potter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794210 | Goldhaber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5806044 | Powell | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5822737 | Ogram | Oct 1998 | A |
5826241 | Stein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5855008 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857188 | Douglas | Jan 1999 | A |
5857201 | Wright et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5857203 | Kauffman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874412 | Priebe et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883620 | Hobbs | Mar 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897621 | Boesch et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897622 | Blinn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903874 | Leonard et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5909544 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913203 | Wong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5944790 | Levy | Aug 1999 | A |
5945652 | Ohki | Aug 1999 | A |
5953423 | Rosen | Sep 1999 | A |
5956694 | Powell | Sep 1999 | A |
5960409 | Wexler | Sep 1999 | A |
5963647 | Downing et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963917 | Ogram | Oct 1999 | A |
5963923 | Garber | Oct 1999 | A |
5969974 | Vandenbelt et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970469 | Scroggie et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971274 | Milchman | Oct 1999 | A |
5974412 | Hazlehurst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983196 | Wendkos | Nov 1999 | A |
5987500 | Arunachalam | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999913 | Goodwin, III | Dec 1999 | A |
6009412 | Storey | Dec 1999 | A |
6014634 | Scroggie et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016955 | De Rooij et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018721 | Aziz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029015 | Ishiguro | Feb 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029150 | Kravitz | Feb 2000 | A |
6035280 | Christensen | Mar 2000 | A |
6035288 | Solomon | Mar 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039244 | Finsterwald | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Mori et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047274 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6095410 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101485 | Fortenberry et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105001 | Masi | Aug 2000 | A |
6105008 | Davis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119229 | Martinez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122355 | Strohl | Sep 2000 | A |
6138107 | Elgamal | Oct 2000 | A |
6161082 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173267 | Cairns | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199079 | Gupta | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205433 | Boesch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212556 | Arunachalam | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237145 | Narasimhan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246996 | Stein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266652 | Godin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269345 | Riboud | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278980 | Wendkos | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321208 | Barnett et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321210 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330543 | Kepecs | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336009 | Suzumi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336099 | Barnett et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6386446 | Himmel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389427 | Faulkner | May 2002 | B1 |
6401077 | Godden et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6460020 | Pool et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490602 | Kraemer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523012 | Glassman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6556975 | Wittsche | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571216 | Garg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574239 | Dowling et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578012 | Storey | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594640 | Postrel | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598028 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628307 | Fair | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643624 | Philippe | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6721715 | Nemzow | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748367 | Lee | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7206768 | deGroeve et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7398229 | Budish | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7458507 | Fillinger et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7540408 | Levine et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7599857 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644037 | Ostrovsky | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7660740 | Boone et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7742985 | Digrigoli et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7801816 | Alarcon-Luther et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7856384 | Kulasooriya et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
8055582 | Digrigoli et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8249990 | Digrigoli et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266016 | Boone et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20010007099 | Rau et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010009005 | Godin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011241 | Nemzow | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023407 | Liyanearachchi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025265 | Takayasu | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027436 | Tenembaum | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010029455 | Chin et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032164 | Kim | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032878 | Tsiounis et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034694 | Elias | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047308 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049628 | Icho | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049647 | Sheehan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002538 | Ling | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013767 | Katz | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013774 | Morimoto | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026423 | Maritzen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029339 | Rowe | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038282 | Montgomery | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040344 | Preiser et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046157 | Solomon | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049664 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069134 | Solomon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069184 | Tilly et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073015 | Chan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099656 | Poh Wong | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111889 | Buxton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111907 | Ling | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120548 | Etkin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120554 | Vega | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147655 | Say | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174031 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174050 | Eynard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030014350 | Duell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018885 | Landsman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022719 | Donald et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050861 | Martin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040039692 | Shields et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049423 | Kawashima et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050021455 | Webster | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060015452 | Kulasooriya et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060089897 | Maas et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136301 | Grovit | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060294005 | Drepak | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070198391 | Dreyer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070295903 | Schwartz | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080147479 | Johnson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100131510 | Boone et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100312695 | Digrigoli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110307384 | Digrigoli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120284304 | Boone et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303529 | Digrigoli et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130018738 | Faires et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130117093 | Oda et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Mar 1997 | CA |
4308597 | Aug 1993 | DE |
0251619 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0254812 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0542298 | May 1993 | EP |
0590861 | Apr 1994 | EP |
2658635 | Aug 1991 | FR |
2261579 | May 1993 | GB |
2296413 | Jun 1996 | GB |
2001000469 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001319098 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001338179 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001357248 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002092390 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002109286 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002207898 | Jul 2002 | JP |
9300266 | Feb 1993 | NL |
WO-9116691 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO-9215174 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO-9512169 | May 1995 | WO |
WO-9517711 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9633568 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9634356 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9636024 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO-9641315 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9704411 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9737315 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9743727 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9748078 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9809447 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9809447 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-9960503 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO-9963461 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0058862 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0062231 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0079461 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0116815 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0129750 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0139059 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0152135 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0153929 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0171579 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0171580 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0173665 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0180111 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0182115 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0205179 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0231737 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-0233618 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-0248828 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-02069101 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-02097582 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03038560 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-2004090666 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004090666 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009”, 25 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 27, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 5, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 10, 2008 to Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 25, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Nov. 24, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 19, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 12, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 13, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 22, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Appeal Brief filed Jul. 27, 2010”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed May 27, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2009”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 15, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 3, 2003”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Reply Brief filed Dec. 28, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Mar. 6, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed May 7, 2009 to Advisory Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Sep. 26, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Nov. 6, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 2, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 9, 2009”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Decision on Appeals mailed Jan. 11, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Examiners Answer received Feb. 4, 2010 to Appeal Brief filed Dec. 9, 2009”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2007”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2008”, 31 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Sep. 23, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Feb. 28, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Mar. 12, 2012 to Decision on Appeal mailed Jan. 11, 2012 and to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Mar. 19, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2008”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Jun. 19, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Aug. 15, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Aug. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/607,587, Response filed Oct. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 8, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 29, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Sep. 12, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Nov. 17, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2007”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2008”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 8, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Sep. 28, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Jul. 31, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Jan. 11, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Mar. 16, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Jul. 1, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Aug. 21, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,525, Response filed Oct. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 13, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Advisory Action mailed Oct. 21, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Oct. 3, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Dec. 6, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Final Office Action mailed May 23, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Nov. 5, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed Aug. 23, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Feb. 2, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2011”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Jun. 11, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Jul. 23, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2012”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Response filed Oct. 5, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275 , Response filed Mar. 19, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Non Final Office Action Mailed Dec. 30, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Notice of Allowance mailed May 8, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Notice of Allowance mailed May 5, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 5, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/818,935, Response filed Feb. 17, 2010 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2011”, (Dec. 15, 2011), 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Notice of Allowance mailed May 7, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 4, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,994, Response filed Mar. 8, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“BarterBee.com: Buy, Sell, Why Points?”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/xmain0003/?—hp=trade>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 1 pg. |
“BarterBee.com: Help & FAQ”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/xmain0005/?—hp=faq—4—requesting>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs. |
“BarterBee.com: Points Q & A”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.barterbee.com/smain0003/?—hp=point>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 1 pg. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 19, 2011”, with English translation of claims, 14 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Response filed Jun. 28, 2010 to Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 200480015567.0, Response filed Dec. 23, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2010”, with English translation of claims, 15 pgs. |
“Ebay—Your Personal Trading Community”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991007062815/www.ebay.com>, (Oct. 1999), 23 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Office Action mailed May 15, 2007”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Response filed Nov. 23, 2007 to Office Action mailed May 15, 2007”, 23 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Jul. 13, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/23854, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Aug. 19, 2002”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/23854, International Search Report mailed Dec. 28, 2001”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US04/10084, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 17, 2005”, 18 pgs. |
“New eBay-like auction software released”, Business Wire, Business Editors/High-Tech Writers; Business Wire; New York, (Mar. 17, 1999), 2 pgs. |
“OED Online Main entry text Frame”, [Online]. <URL: http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry—main/50218727?query—type=word&queryword=select&first=1&max—to show+10&sort at Http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry—main/50218727?query—type=word&queryword=approve&first=1&max—to show+10&sort>, (Accessed Apr. 14, 2008), 8 pgs. |
“Peerflix: How it Works”, Copyright © 2004-2006 Peerflix, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.peerflix.com/Default.aspx?tabid=64>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs. |
“Peerflix: Netflix, Blockbuster and Peerflix: Compare Online DVD Rentals vs. Buying vs. Trading”, Copyright © 2004-2006 Peerflix, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.peerflix.com/Default.aspx?tabid=171>, (Accessed Aug. 14, 2006), 2 pgs. |
“PSINet Teams with WorldPay Ltd. to Launch the World's First Secure Multi-Currency Solution for International Electronic Commerce”, PR Newswire Association, (Oct. 6, 1997), 3 pgs. |
“RSA signs deal with China”, Internet Week, 2(7), (Feb. 12, 1996), 2 pgs. |
“Yahoo Homepage”, Internet Archive Wayback Machine, http://web.archive.org/web/19991003015603/http://www.yahoo.com/index.html, (Oct. 3, 1999), 1 p. |
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Afghanistan”, Copyright © 1994-97 Yahoo! Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20060921181441/http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/countries/afghanistan>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 1 pg. |
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Sweden”, Copyright © 1994-97 Yahoo! Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19970616194441/www.yahoo.com/Regional/Countries/Sweden/>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 2 pgs. |
“Yahoo! Auctions Celebrates One-Year Anniversary; As Online Auction Usage Continues to Grow, Yahoo! Is Quickly Becoming the World Marketplace of the New Millennium”, Business Wire, (Sep. 14, 1999), 3 pages. |
Akin, David, “Web retailing gains market muscle as concerns fade: Record season: Increasing number of sites catering for Canadian dollars”, Financial Post, p04, XP002905105, (Dec. 26, 1998), 3 pages. |
Asbrand, Deborah, “Taking Stock in Trading Exchanges”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.reed-electronics.com/eb-mag/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA42124>, (Apr. 1, 2000), 5 pgs. |
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Jan. 1995), 83-84. |
Bers, Joanna Smith, “Cyberspace: The new promised land”, Bank Systems & Technology, 32(7), (Jul. 1995), 32-37. |
Bidnbuy, “Going, going, virtually gone . . . ”, Business and Finance Dialog File 20#06012646, (Jun. 17,1999), 3 pgs. |
Business Wire, “Subasta.com Enters Into Strategic Partnership with From2.com”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 43206061, (Jul. 16, 1999), 2 pages. |
Business Wire, “Yahoo! Launches Three New European Auctions Services; Yahoo! Italy, Yahoo! Spain and Yahoo! Sweden Unveil New Local Auctions”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45061209, (Sep. 23, 1999), 3 pages. |
Chan, H. C., et al., “Design and implementation of a mobile agent-based auction system”, Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2001. PACRIM. 2001 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference, vol. 2, (Aug. 26-28, 2001), 740-743. |
Chapman, Robert L, et al., “Roget's International thesaurus fourth edition”, sec 637, Thomas Y Crowell, Publishers New York, (1977), 3 pgs. |
Chen, Jian, “Bidder's strategy under group-buying auction on the Interne”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 32 Issue: 6, (Nov. 2002), 680-690. |
Clemons, E., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-61. |
Cohen, Jackie, “Citibank's Bid to Be the King of Cash (Citibank unveils Electronic Monetary System prototype, a digital currency system capable of replacing all current monetary systems)”, Bank Technology News, 9(9), (Sep. 1996), p. 9+. |
Cooper, C., et al., “Playing Catch-Up: U.S. Web Firms Get Slow Start in Europe, Amid Crowded Field—Used to Being First and Best at Home, They Stumble in World's No. 2 Market—Pouncing on Amazon Delays”, Wall Street Journal Europe, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46338867, (Nov. 15, 1999), 5 pages. |
Creed, Adam, “Haggling Online In The Philippines—Magtawaran Auction site—Company Business and Marketing—Brief Article”, Newsbytes News Network, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—m0NEW/is—2000—May—1/ai—61859593, (May 1, 2000), Web Page. |
Dalton, Gary, “Going, Going, Gone!—E-commerce is leading to an anything-goes environment of online bidding and dynamic pricing”, Information Week, http://www.informationweek.com/755/auction.htm, (Oct. 4, 1999), 4 pages. |
Davidow, Emily, “The dynamics of pricing”, Home Textiles Today, (Feb. 2000), p. 42. |
Edwards, Mark, “Your Web Browser is Bugged”, Windows IT Pro, http://www.windowsitpro.com/WindowsSecurity/Article/ArticleID/9543/WindowsSecurity—9543.html, (Jul. 13, 2000), 3 pages. |
Edwards, Morris, “New B2B player spreads benefits of e-commerce”, Communications News, (Jan. 2001), 4 pages. |
Fisher, Dennis, “More Goods on the Block”, EWeek, (Dec. 2000), 4 pages. |
Franse, Karen, “Distribution Briefs—Are Auctions in Vogue?”, VARBusiness, http://www.varbusiness.com/sections/strategy/strategy.jhtml?articleId=18828086, (Mar. 11, 2002), 2 pgs. |
Goldsborough, Reid, “Internet Auctions Examined”, Link-Up, 17, (Nov./Dec. 2000), p. 24. |
Goldstein, D E, “Medical E-procurement-navigating in a B2B Market”, Health Management Technology, 21(8), (Aug. 2000), 30-6. |
Graham, Ian, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Electronic Markets. vol. 8, No. 2, (1998), 1-4. |
Greengard, Samuel, “What Traffic Will Bear”, BusinessFinanceMag.com, http://www.businessfinancemag.com/magazine/archives/article.html?articleID=13725, (Mar. 2001), 4 pages. |
Gupta, Pankaj, “Most Flexible FF?”, Google Groups, (Oct. 29, 1996), 2 pages. |
Hess, C. M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-274. |
Jaroneczyk, Jennifer, “Sold on an Old Idea”, Internet World Magazine, (Feb. 15, 2001), 3 pages. |
Kalin, Sari, “Mar. 2001”, Darwin Magazine, http://www.darwinmag.com/read/040101/low.html, (Apr. 2001), 5 pages. |
Klein, Stefan, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 1-4. |
Kumar, Manoj, et al., “Sales Promotions on the Internet”, Proceedings of the Usenix Conference on E-commerce, (1998), 1-11. |
Lassila, Ora, “Web metadata; A Matter of Semantics”, IEEE Internet Computing, v2i4pg30 Proquest #1424143061, (1998), 15 pgs. |
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406. |
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 24-28. |
Lee, Pui-Mun, et al., “Considering exchange rate movements in economic evaluation of foreign direct investments”, Engineering Economist, 40(2), (Winter, 1995), 171-199. |
Lindsay, Jeff, et al., “The Historic Use of Computerized Tools for Marketing and Market Research: A Brief Survey”, Published as Document 6359D at IP.com, (Dec. 27, 2001), 20 pages. |
M2 Presswire, “HP completes online strategy with launch of e-commerce site”, Proquest#43225990, (Jun. 29, 1999), 3 pgs. |
M2 Presswire, “United Technologies: UTC's Carrier Corp. teams with FreeMarkets to create largest Asian-based B2B online auction market to date; UTC Division identifies average annual savings of more than 16 percent on electric motors through FreeMarkets B2B eMarketpla”, M2 Presswire, (Mar. 22, 2000), 2 pages. |
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, 14(25), (Jun. 1987), 484-497. |
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps. |
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50. |
McClenahen, John, “Net Gains”, Industry Week, Cleveland. vol. 248, Iss. 10, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=O&did=41808971&SrchMode= l&sid=5&Fmt=4& V . . . >, (May 17, 1999), p. 51. |
McDougall, Bruce, “Electronic evolution”, Canadian Banker, 102(5), (Sep.-Oct. 1995), p. 28(6). |
McKendrick, Joseph, “Old Economy Players Step Up”, EC World, (Nov. 2000), 35-44. |
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs. |
Merlino, Laurel, “Auction Anxiety”, Upside Today, (Oct. 2000), 247-251. |
Mitchell, Lori, “BayBuilder delivers easy, profitable reverse auctions”, Infoworld, http://www.infoworld.com/articles/eu/xml/00/06/05/000605eubaybuilder.html, (Jun. 2, 2000), 6 pages. |
Mollison, Caitlin, “America West Airlines opt for reverse auctions”, Internet World, 8(4), (Apr. 1, 2002), 42(3). |
Mollman, Steve, “Are you ready to bicker over the price of that sandwich? In the new economy you won't pay retail for anything.”, PC/Computing, (Jan. 1, 2000), 8-10. |
Morgan, Lisa, “Pick Your Lot: Build consumer-oriented auctions with AuctionBuilder”, Internet Week, (Sep. 18, 2000), 4 pages. |
Neo, B. S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288. |
Ohlson, Kathleen, “Looking behind, beyond B2B marketplace woes”, Network World Fusion, http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2001/119669—06-11-2001.html, (Jun. 11, 2001), 4 pages. |
Patel, Jeetu, et al., “New Platform Options Fuel E-Commerce”, Information Week,, http://www.informationweek.com/779/ecommerce.htm, (Mar. 27, 2000), 3 Pages. |
Piccinelli, G, et al., “e-service composition: supporting dynamic definition of process-oriented negotiation parameters”, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2001. Proceedings., (Sep. 3-7 , 2001), 727-731. |
Pollick, M., “Sold! on eBay: As antique and collectible dealers see their sales increase through online auctions such as eBay, more of them are deciding that the internet is not something to be afraid of”, Sarasota Herald Tribune, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45499060, (Oct. 11, 1999), 8 pages. |
Post, D. L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584. |
PR Newswire Europe Ltd., “Mitsubishi Venture, Wells Fargo Partner to Offer Multi-Currency E-Commerce Storefront”, PR Newswire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 39345965, (Mar. 1, 1999), 3 pages. |
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1999), 11-18. |
Pressler, Margaret, “Sells on eBay; Housewife finds herself head of multinational software firm”, Washington Post, Proquest # 44484325, (Sep. 5, 1999), 3 pgs. |
Queree, Anne, “Bid it Out”, Global Finance, (Jan. 2000), 36-37. |
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 17-23. |
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48. |
Rockoff, T. E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16. |
Schmid, B. F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs. |
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3. |
Strassmann, Paul, “The Impact of B2B”, Computerworld, (Oct. 2, 2000), 3 pages. |
Tapscott, D., “eBay endagners traditional papers auctioneer can pack far more punch in your sales pitch”, National Post, Proquest# 54945579, (Oct. 9, 1999), 3 pgs. |
Tjostheim, Ingvar, et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.nr.no/˜ingvar/enter98.html>, (Accessed Feb. 21, 2005), 1-10. |
Turban, Efraim, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, EM—Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 7-11. |
Turek, Norbert, “Online Portals Offer Bandwidth and Voice Services”, Information Week, http://www.informationweek.com/784/bandwidth.htm, (May 1, 2000), 4 pages. |
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, (1996), 6 pgs. |
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-15. |
Weiss, Scott, “Pan-Am FF Program”, Google Groups, (Oct. 16, 1996), 3 pages. |
Wilson, D., “Going . . . Going . . . Gone!Bargain-hunters and collectors can scour auctions from home via the internet”, The Gazette, Proquest #4116732, (Apr. 27, 1999), 4 pgs. |
Wilson, T., “Act Globally, Think Locally”, InternetWeek, Issue 789, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46352181, (Nov. 15, 1999), 4 p. |
Wilson, Tim, “B2B Sellers Fight Back on Pricing”, InternetWeek.com, http://www.internetweek.com/lead/lead121200.htm, (Dec. 12, 2000), 3 pages. |
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Sep. 6, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Appeal Decision mailed May 31, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 3, 2013”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Examiner's Answer mailed May 10, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,262, Reply Brief filed Jul. 10, 2013 in response to Examiner's Answer mailed May 10, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Response filed Jun. 24, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606 , Response filed May 17, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120303529 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13212994 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13567902 | US | |
Parent | 12818935 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13212994 | US | |
Parent | 10608525 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 12818935 | US |