This application is a National Phase Application of PCT International Application No. PCT/GB2007/050727, International Filing Date 29 Nov. 2007; claiming priority of: GB Patent Application, 0625564.0, filed 21 Dec. 2006; GB Patent Application 0625557.4, filed 21 Dec. 2006; and EP Patent Application 06256461.2, filed 21 Dec. 2006, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to a multi-element antenna and in particular, but not exclusively, to a multi-element antenna and associated switching arrangement designed for use in a monopulse radar collision avoidance system.
The Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) is an implementation of the Airborne Collision Avoidance System which is fitted to all aircraft over a certain weight and/or passenger carrying capacity, as mandated by the International Civil Aviation Organisation. A recent implementation of TCAS employs an eight element circular antenna array which is fed through a conventional Butler matrix to generate circular phase modes in the array. The circular modes are phase shifted and combined in a sum/difference hybrid to provide a monopulse radar system with claimed resolution of 2° or better. However, TCAS relies upon the relative phase of two circular modes to detect a potential hazard and as such is sensitive, in certain mounting arrangements, to multipath reflections from parts of a host airframe leading to reduced resolution and potential false alarms.
From a first aspect the present invention resides in antenna, comprising a plurality of top-loaded monopole antenna elements mounted above a ground plane for providing coverage over a predetermined range of angles in azimuth using a plurality of beams, each antenna element having a base section and a top section, wherein a feed conductor extends from an entry point provided in the base section to connect to a top element positioned at the top section, and the feed conductor is surrounded by and insulated from a hollow cylindrical electrically conducting stem section that extends from the base section, where the stem section connects to the ground plane, to a level proximate to but separated from the top element, in combination with a switch array, wherein at least some of said plurality of antenna elements are connected to switches in said switch array and wherein said switch array is operable to connect selected pairs of said antenna elements to a signal path to thereby generate each of said plurality of beams and to establish a virtual short circuit in respect of unselected antenna elements.
Amongst the design constraints for a collision warning/avoidance system suitable for use with military jet aircraft in particular, are good directionality of the beams emitted by the antenna. This is to avoid unwanted emissions, for example in the backward direction relative to the direction of motion of the aircraft, which might interfere with other systems on board or give away the aircraft's presence or position. The antenna and associated switch array according to this first aspect of the present invention, particularly when used to generate sum and difference beams in a monopulse radar based system, offers particularly good directionality in comparison with prior art arrangements.
The use of top-loaded monopole antenna elements make for a particularly low-profile antenna. Moreover, the design of the antenna feed, in which a feed conductor is surrounded by a hollow cylindrical stem section, enables the input impedance of the antenna element to be set (e.g. to 50 Ohms) by appropriate dimensioning of the inner diameter of the stem section relative to the diameter of the feed conductor, thus forming a quarter-wave transformer. This has the advantage that an external matching transformer for each antenna element is avoided. Furthermore, the inventor in this case has noted that with this antenna element design, in which the top element is effectively fed at the top section of the “stem”, there is a slight improvement in the operational bandwidth of the antenna element in comparison with prior art designs.
Preferably, the match to 50 ohms input impedance is achieved when the antenna is driven in a “sum” mode, that is, when two adjacent antenna elements are driven in phase with equal amplitude.
Preferably, at least one of the plurality of antenna elements is a passive reflector element connected permanently to ground and positioned so as to increase the directionality of the antenna within the predetermined range of angles.
In a preferred embodiment, the top element is in the shape of a substantially flat-topped cone.
Preferably, in the switch array, each of the plurality of switches has a first pole connected to a first antenna element and a second pole connected to a second antenna element and the switch is operable to connect alternately the first or second pole to a signal path and the unconnected pole to ground.
In a further preferred embodiment, each switch in the switch array is implemented using PIN diodes. In particular, each switch in the switch array is a band-limited shunt multi-throw switch.
In a further preferred embodiment, the antenna comprises a pentagonal array of five antenna elements clustered around a central sixth element and at least the central sixth element is permanently connected to ground. In order to increase the directionality of the antenna yet further, a further one of the six antenna elements is permanently connected to ground and the remaining four ungrounded antenna elements are connected to the switch array.
In a yet further preferred embodiment, the antenna comprises a square array of four antenna elements for use with the same switch array.
The present invention also extends to a collision warning or avoidance system having an antenna, in combination with a switch array, according to preferred embodiments of the present invention outlined above.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide an antenna for use in a monopulse radar collision warning/avoidance system and an associated switching arrangement. The antennae and associated switching arrangements are designed for use in a frequency range of interest, preferably 1020-1100 MHz (the IFF band). The antennae and switching arrangements are designed for use in particular as part of a collision warning/avoidance system for aircraft, although preferred embodiments of the present invention may also be applied to other types of craft with a requirement for collision warning/avoidance, e.g. road vehicles or ships.
An antenna according to a first embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to
Referring to
Each of the antenna elements 100-125 is a top-loaded monopole (TLM) antenna, selected in particular to minimise the overall height of the antenna. Preferably, the antenna elements 100-125 are spaced 72 mm apart, which is of the order of one quarter-wavelength in the IFF band. Wider element spacing would be desirable, where mounting constraints permit, to help to avoid problems in a feed network arising from the high inter-element coupling. However, space constraints may impose a closer antenna element spacing, of less than one quarter wavelength. In particular, in one application of the present invention, the antenna elements 100-120 are located at points on a radius of 55 mm from the central element 125. Further preferred and advantageous features of the antenna elements 100-125 will be described below.
In order to operate the antenna of this first preferred embodiment of the present invention in a collision warning system, a preferred switching arrangement and method of operation of the switches will now be described with reference to
Referring to
The switch outputs are linked to four of the antenna elements 100-125 of the antenna so that only those four antenna elements are used actively to transmit or receive signals, the remaining two elements being short-circuited permanently to the ground plane so that they act as passive reflector elements. This has the advantage that the level of back-facing coverage of the antenna is reduced in comparison with the level of generally forward-facing coverage, with respect to the direction of flight of the aircraft carrying the antenna. In practice, a front-to-back ratio of up to 13 dB has been achieved in the coverage with this design.
Preferably the switch output A is connected to the antenna element 100; the switch output B is connected to the antenna element 105; the switch output C is connected to the antenna element 110; and the switch output D is connected to the antenna element 115. Within the switching arrangement, switch 205 (S1) is operable to connect either antenna element 105 (output B) or antenna element 115 (output D) to the input signal path 215, while switch 210 is operable to connect either antenna element 100 (output A) or antenna element 110 (output C) to input signal path 220. Thus, antenna elements 100-115 may be selected in pairs, each pair providing substantially identically-shaped sum and difference beam patterns in three different predetermined directions in azimuth—beam direction being defined in this case as the azimuth of the null in the difference pattern generated by the selected pair of antenna elements—with an appropriate choice of switch positions for switches S1 and S2, as summarised in the following table. In this table, “X” indicates that the switch output and hence the respective antenna element is connected to a signal path, while “-” indicates that the switch output and hence the respective antenna element is shorted to Ground.
Each unselected pair of switch outputs are preferably shorted to ground in the switch and the signal path lengths between the switch output and the respective antenna elements are carefully chosen—a multiple of half-wavelengths of the operational signals—to ensure that there is a virtual short circuit present at the unselected antenna elements at each switch combination. The unselected elements therefore act as passive reflectors, so improving the directionality of the beams produced by the corresponding selected pair of antenna elements. In this table, it is assumed that a beam direction of 0° represents a directly forward-facing beam with respect to the host aircraft. In practice, the antenna according to the first embodiment of the present invention provides a total angular coverage in azimuth of at least ±120°.
Preferably, antenna elements 100 and 115 would not be activated together, corresponding to switches S1 and S2 both being in position 0, as the grounded antenna elements 110 and 115 would tend to distort the beam in the forward direction.
As mentioned above, in order to provide the correct reactive load to the antenna elements not selected in a particular switch combination, the lengths of transmission line which connect the antenna elements to the switches must be of the correct length. In particular, where the transmission line stubs 240 within the switching arrangement shown in
A preferred design for an antenna element 100-125 will now be described with reference to
Referring to
A coaxial connector 335 extends through the base section 310 of the antenna element 300 to provide an electrical connection to the feed 315 by means of a conventional coaxial socket 337. The base section 310 of the antenna element 300 is inserted into a hole through the saddle plate 130 from below and secured.
Preferably, the top element 325 comprises a central flat section 340 surrounded by a conical skirt section 345 inclined at approximately 30° below the plane of the flat section 340. This has the advantage over use of an entirely flat top element that the outer antenna elements 100-120 enable a closer-fitting and hence smaller radome to be provided, minimising the overall height and width of the antenna structure.
Preferably the radius of the top element 325 is selected to tune the antenna to substantially the centre frequency in the frequency band of interest, e.g. the IFF band. Preferably, for the IFF band, the radius of the top element 325 is approximately 20 mm. Furthermore, the dimensions of the stem section 305, in particular the radius of the inner and outer conductors of the coaxial transformer formed inside the stem section 325, are selected to ensure that the input impedance of the antenna element 300 of 50 ohms when two adjacent antenna elements 300 are driven in phase with equal amplitude. i.e. in the “sum” mode. However, while a good impedance match is achieved in the “sum” mode, a compromise may be required as regards impedance matching in the “difference” mode, i.e. when two adjacent antenna elements 300 are driven in antiphase. Preferably, the mismatch in the “difference” mode is compensated for by adding matching elements 245, e.g. a matching transformer and matching stubs, in the difference path following the hybrid coupler 225. If preferred, the air gap 320, which is typically only 1 or 2 mm wide, may be filled with a dielectric material of an appropriate dielectric constant, preferably of ∈r=2.
Whereas the switching arrangement described functionally above with reference to
Referring to
When the switch is in one of its two possible states, the diodes 430 are forward biased in one branch of the switch and reverse biased in the other. The biasing is applied by means of respective bias inputs 435 and 440. Those diodes 430 that are forward biased connect the respective transmission line sections 425 to ground, so forming a quarter wavelength stub with a high impedance. Those diodes 430 that are reverse biased appear effectively as small (unwanted) capacitances. An input (405) RF signal is able to travel along that branch of the switch having the reversed biased diodes 430 to the respective RF output 415 or 420.
Each of the first and second RF outputs 415, 420 is connected to a different antenna element, for example in the configuration described above with reference to
In a second preferred embodiment of the present invention, a simpler four element antenna is provided, using the same switching arrangement as used in the first embodiment and as described with reference to
Referring to
The antenna according to this second embodiment of the present invention has the advantage of being a simpler design. However, the ratio of front-to-back coverage is reduced in comparison to the six element design of
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2007/050727 | 11/29/2007 | WO | 00 | 3/17/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/075093 | 6/26/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3334348 | Alfano, Jr. | Aug 1967 | A |
3380061 | Larson et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3384896 | Kriz | May 1968 | A |
3419873 | Harris et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3484787 | Vallese | Dec 1969 | A |
4313121 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4466003 | Royce | Aug 1984 | A |
4700197 | Milne | Oct 1987 | A |
4897664 | Killackey et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4939525 | Brunner | Jul 1990 | A |
5191349 | Dinsmore et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5479176 | Zavrel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5767807 | Pritchett | Jun 1998 | A |
6859181 | Colburn et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6917341 | Ishihara et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956533 | Lindenmeier | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6987493 | Chen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7265727 | Connor | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20020036586 | Gothard et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 989 629 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 989 629 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1355377 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2 355 855 | May 2001 | GB |
2001345633 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003258533 | Sep 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100060513 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |