Multi-element directional acoustic arrays

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8265310
  • Patent Number
    8,265,310
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 3, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 11, 2012
    11 years ago
Abstract
An audio system that may be implemented in a television, that includes a plurality of directional arrays. The arrays may include a common acoustic driver and may be spaces non-uniformly.
Description
BACKGROUND

This specification describes an audio system that may be implemented in a television, that includes a plurality of directional arrays. The arrays may include a common acoustic driver and may be spaced non-uniformly.


SUMMARY

In one aspect an audio system includes at least three acoustic drivers, arranged substantially in a line, and separated by a non-uniform distance; a first interference directional array, includes a first subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating one of a left channel audio signal and a right channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the first subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; and a second interference directional array, includes a second subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating the other of a left channel audio and a right channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the second subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; the first subset and the second subset includes at least one common acoustic driver. The distance between the two leftmost acoustic drivers of the first directional array may be less than the distance between any other two of the acoustic drivers of the first directional array and the distance between the two rightmost acoustic drivers of the second directional array may be less than the distance between any other two acoustic drivers of the second directional array. The radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers may face upwardly. The acoustic drivers may face upwardly and backwardly. The radiating surface of the leftmost acoustic driver may face outwardly. The audio system may further include an acoustically opaque barrier in front of the acoustic drivers. The audio system may be implemented in a television. The audio system may further include a first interference directional array that includes a third subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating a center channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the third subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in one direction is less than radiation in other directions.


In another aspect, a television that includes an audio device, includes at least three acoustic drivers, arranged substantially in a line, and separated by a non-uniform distance; a first interference directional array, includes a first subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating one of a left channel audio signal and a right channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the first subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; and a second interference directional array, includes a second subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating the other of a left channel audio and a right channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the second subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; the first subset and the second subset including at least one common acoustic driver. The distance between the two leftmost acoustic drivers of the first directional array may be less than the distance between any other two of the acoustic drivers of the first directional array and the distance between the two rightmost acoustic drivers of the second directional array may be less than the distance between any other two acoustic drivers of the second directional array. The radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers may face upwardly. The radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers may face upwardly and backwardly. The radiating surface of the leftmost acoustic driver may face outwardly. The television system may further include an acoustically opaque barrier in front of the acoustic drivers. A television system may further include a first interference directional array, includes a third subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating a center channel audio signal; and signal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the third subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in one direction is less than radiation in other directions.


Other features, objects, and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description, when read in connection with the following drawing, in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a top diagrammatic view and a front diagrammatic view of an audio module;



FIG. 2 is a top diagrammatic view, a front diagrammatic view, and a side diagrammatic view of a television including the audio module of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 3A and 3B are side diagrammatic views showing one or more of the acoustic drivers of the audio module;



FIG. 3C-3E are front diagrammatic views of an end acoustic driver of the audio module; and



FIGS. 4A-4D are each diagrammatic views of the audio module, showing the configuration of one of the directional arrays.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Though the elements of several views of the drawing may be shown and described as discrete elements in a block diagram and may be referred to as “circuitry”, unless otherwise indicated, the elements may be implemented as one of, or a combination of, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, or one or more microprocessors executing software instructions. The software instructions may include digital signal processing (DSP) instructions. Operations may be performed by analog circuitry or by a microprocessor executing software that performs the mathematical or logical equivalent to the analog operation. Unless otherwise indicated, signal lines may be implemented as discrete analog or digital signal lines, as a single discrete digital signal line with appropriate signal processing to process separate streams of audio signals, or as elements of a wireless communication system. Some of the processes may be described in block diagrams. The activities that are performed in each block may be performed by one element or by a plurality of elements, and may be separated in time. The elements that perform the activities of a block may be physically separated. Unless otherwise indicated, audio signals or video signals or both may be encoded and transmitted in either digital or analog form; conventional digital-to-analog or analog-to-digital converters may not be shown in the figures. For simplicity of wording “radiating acoustic energy corresponding to the audio signals in channel x” will be referred to as “radiating channel x.”



FIG. 1 shows a top view and a front view of an audio module 12 including a plurality, in this embodiment seven, of acoustic drivers 18-1-18-7. One of the acoustic drivers 18-4 is positioned near the lateral center of the module, near the top of the audio module. Three acoustic drivers 18-1-18-3 are positioned near the left extremity 20 of the audio module and are closely and non-uniformly spaced, so that distance l1≠l2, l2≠l3, l1≠3. Additionally, the spacing may be arranged so that 11<12<13. Similarly, distance l6≠l5, l5≠l4, l6≠4. Additionally, the spacing may be arranged so that l6<l5<l4. In one implementation, l1=l6=55 mm, l2=l5=110 mm, and l3=l4=255 mm. The device of FIG. 1 may be a standalone audio device, or may be implemented in a television set, as is shown below. Direction indicator 16 shows the intended orientation of the audio module 12 in use.


The audio module 12 of FIG. 1 is particularly beneficial when used with, or integrated in, a television or similar media device. FIG. 2 shows a top view, a side view, and a front view of a television 10 with an audio module 12 of FIG. 1 included in the television console. The audio module is substantially linear and extends horizontally across the television, above the screen. In other implementations, the audio module may be positioned below the screen. More detail of the audio module is shown in subsequent figures. A listener 14 is shown in the top view, which along with direction indicator 16 shows the orientation of the television.



FIGS. 3A-3E show some variations of the orientations of one or more of the acoustic drivers 18-1-18-7. In the side view of FIG. 3A, the acoustic driver 18-n (where n=1-7), is upward firing, that is, the radiating surface faces upwards. In the side view of FIG. 3B, the acoustic driver 18-n is oriented so that the radiating surface faces upward and backward at an angle θ, greater than 0 degrees and less than 90 degrees, relative to vertical. In the front view of FIG. 3C, the acoustic driver 18-1 closest to the left extremity of the acoustic module 12 is oriented substantially directly upward. In the front view of FIG. 3D, the acoustic driver 18-1 closest to the left extremity of the acoustic module 12 is oriented upward and outward at an angle relative to vertical. In FIG. 3E, the acoustic driver 18-1, angle λ is 90 degrees, so that the acoustic driver is side-firing, that is facing sidewards. The mirror image of FIGS. 3D and 3E can be used with acoustic driver 18-7. The orientation of FIG. 3D can be implemented with acoustic driver 18-2 or 18-3 or both. The mirror image of FIG. 3D can be implemented with acoustic driver 18-5 or 18-6 or both. One or more of the acoustic drivers may be in an orientation that is a combination of the orientations of FIGS. 3A-3E; for example, an acoustic driver may be tilted backward and outward relative to vertical. In one implementation, acoustic drivers 18-2-18-6 are tilted backward so that angle θ is 27±5% degrees and acoustic drivers 18-1 and 18-7 are replaced by a directional speaker such as is described in U.S. Pat. Published Pat. App. 2009/0274329A1, configured so that the radiation is substantially sideward.


Orienting the acoustic drivers according to FIGS. 3A-3E, together with signal processing as described below, causes more or the total acoustic radiation arriving at the listener to be indirect radiation than is the case with conventional audio systems. A greater proportion of the acoustic radiation being indirect radiation results in a desirable spacious acoustic image.


Causing as much as possible of the acoustic radiation experienced by the listener to be indirect radiation is accomplished by forming interference type directional arrays consisting of subsets of the acoustic drivers 18-1-18-7. Interference type directional arrays are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,870,484 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,153. At frequencies at which the individual acoustic drivers radiate substantially omnidirectionally (for example frequencies with corresponding wavelengths that are more than twice the diameter of the radiating surface of the acoustic drivers), radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively or non-destructively with radiation from each of the other acoustic drivers. The combined effect of the destructive and non-destructive interference is that the radiation is some directions is significantly less, for example, −14 dB, relative to the maximum radiation in any direction. The directions at which the radiation is significantly less than the maximum radiation in any direction will be referred to as “null directions”. Causing more radiation experienced by a listener to be indirect radiation is accomplished by causing the direction between the audio module and the listener to be a null direction.


At frequencies with corresponding wavelengths that are less than twice the diameter of the radiating surface of an acoustic driver, the radiation pattern becomes less omnidirectional and more directional, until at frequencies with corresponding wavelengths that are equal to or less than the diameter of the radiating surface of an acoustic driver, the radiation patterns of the individual driver becomes inherently directional. At these frequencies, there is less destructive and nondestructive interference between the acoustic drivers of the array, and the acoustic image tends to collapse to the individual acoustic drivers. However, if the acoustic drivers are oriented according to FIGS. 3A-3E, even at frequencies with corresponding wavelengths that are equal to or less than the diameter of the radiating surface, the listener experiences indirect radiation. A result is that the perceived source is diffuse and somewhere other than at the acoustic driver. In addition, the barrier 21 deflects radiation so that it reaches the listener indirectly. The barrier has the additional advantage that it hides the acoustic drivers and protects them from damage from the front of the television.



FIG. 4A shows a diagrammatic view of audio module 12, showing the configuration of directional arrays of the audio module. The audio module is used to radiate the channels of a multi-channel audio signal source 22. Typically, a multi-channel audio signal source for use with a television has at least a left (L), right (R), and Center (C) channel. In FIG. 4A, the left channel array 32 includes acoustic drivers 18-1, 18-2, 18-3, 18-4, and 18-5. The acoustic drivers 18-1-18-5 are coupled to the left channel signal source 38 by signal processing circuitry 24-1-24-5, respectively that apply signal processing represented by transfer function H1L(z)-H5L(z), respectively. The effect of the transfer functions H1L(z)-H5L(z) on the left channel audio signal may include one or more of phase shift, time delay, polarity inversion, and others. Transfer functions H1L(z)-H5L(z) are typically implemented as digital filters, but may be implemented with equivalent analog devices.


In operation, the left channel signal L, as modified by the transfer functions H1L(z)-H5L(z) is transduced to acoustic energy by the acoustic drivers 18-1-18-5. The radiation from the acoustic drivers interferes destructively and non-destructively to result in a desired directional radiation pattern. To achieve a spacious stereo image, the left array 32 directs radiation toward the left boundary of the room as indicated by arrow 13 and cancels radiation toward the listener. The use of digital filters to apply transfer functions to create directional interference arrays is described, for example, in Boone, et al., Design of a Highly Directional Endfire Loudspeaker Array, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol 57. The concept is also discussed with regard to microphones van der Wal et al., Design of Logarithmically Spaced Constant Directivity-Directivity Transducer Arrays, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 44, No. 6, June 1996 (also discussed with regard to loudspeakers), and in Ward, et al., Theory and design of broadband sensor arrays with frequency invariant far-field beam patterns, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (2), February 1995. Mathematically, directional microphone array concepts may generally be applied to loudspeakers.


Similarly, in FIG. 4B, the right channel array 34 includes acoustic drivers 18-3, 18-4, 18-5, 18-6, and 18-7. The acoustic drivers 18-3-18-7 are coupled to the right channel signal source 40 but signal processing circuitry 24-3-24-7, respectively that apply signal processing represented by transfer function H3R(z)-H7R(z), respectively. The effect of the transfer functions H3R(z)-H7R(z) may include one or more of phase shift, time delay, polarity inversion, and others. Transfer functions H3R(z)-H7R(z) are typically implemented as digital filters, but may be implemented with equivalent analog devices.


In operation, the left channel signal L, as modified by the transfer functions H3R(z)-H7R(z) is transduced to acoustic energy by the acoustic drivers 18-3-18-7. The radiation from the acoustic drivers interferes destructively and non-destructively to result in a desired directional radiation pattern. To achieve a spacious stereo image, the right array 34 directs radiation toward the right boundary of the room as indicated by arrow 15 and cancels radiation toward the listener.


In FIG. 4C, the center channel array 36 includes acoustic drivers 18-2, 18-3, 18-4, 18-5, and 18-6. The acoustic drivers 18-2-18-6 are coupled to the center channel signal source 42 by signal processing circuitry 24-2-24-6, respectively that apply signal processing represented by transfer function H2C(z)-H6C(z), respectively. The effect of the transfer functions H2C(z)-H6C(z) may include one or more of phase shift, time delay, polarity inversion, and others. Transfer functions H2C(z)-H6C(z) are typically implemented as digital filters, but may be implemented with equivalent analog devices.


In operation, the center channel signal C, as modified by the transfer functions H2C(z)-H2C(z) is transduced to acoustic energy by the acoustic drivers 18-2-18-6. The radiation from the acoustic drivers interferes destructively and non-destructively to result in a desired directional radiation pattern.


An alternative configuration for the center channel array is shown in FIG. 4D, in which the center channel array 36 includes acoustic drivers 18-1, 18-3, 18-4, 18-5, and 18-7. The acoustic drivers 18-1, 18-3-18-5, and 18-7 are coupled to the center channel signal source 42 by signal processing circuitry 24-1, 24-3-24-5, and 24-7, respectively that apply signal processing represented by transfer function H1C(z), H3C(z)-H5C(z), and H7C(z), respectively. The effect of the transfer functions H1C(z), H3C(z)-H5C(z)), and H7C(z), may include one or more of phase shift, time delay, polarity inversion, and others. Transfer functions H1C(z), H3C(z)-H5C-(z)), and H7C(z) are typically implemented as digital filters, but may be implemented with equivalent analog devices.


In operation, the left channel signal C, as modified by the transfer functions H1C(z), H3C(z)-H5C(z)), and H7C(z) is transduced to acoustic energy by the acoustic drivers 18-1, 18-3-18-5, and 18-7. The radiation from the acoustic drivers interferes destructively and non-destructively to result in a desired directional radiation pattern.


The center channel array 38 of FIGS. 4C and 4D directs radiation upward, as indicated by arrow 17 and backward and cancels radiation toward the listener.


At high frequencies (for example, at frequencies with corresponding wavelengths less than three times the distance between the array elements), the stereo image may tend to “collapse” toward the more closely spaced acoustic drivers of the arrays. If the directional array has array elements in the center of the array are more closely spaced than the elements at the extremities (as in, for example, “nested harmonic” directional arrays or in logarithmically spaced arrays, for example as described in the van der Wal paper mentioned above), the stereo image will collapse toward the center of the array.


One way of preventing the collapse toward the center of the array is to form three arrays, one array of closely spaced elements adjacent the left end of the acoustic module, one at the center of the acoustic module, and one at the right end of the acoustic module. However, this solution requires many acoustic drivers, and is therefore expensive. For example, forming a five element left, center, and right channel arrays would require fifteen acoustic drivers.


An acoustic module according to FIGS. 4A-4D allows for left, center, and right arrays and greatly reduces the amount of collapse of the acoustic image toward the center of the array, with fewer acoustic drivers. Since the collapse tends to be toward the more closely spaced elements, if there is any collapse of the left channel is to the left end of the acoustic module 12 and if there is any collapse of the right channel, it is to the right end of the acoustic module 12 as opposed toward the middle of the acoustic image, which would be the case if the more closely spaced acoustic drivers were near the lateral middle of the acoustic module. Additionally, an audio system according to FIGS. 4A-4D provides a wider portion of the listening area that receives indirect radiation, and therefore has a more diffuse, pleasing stereo image, than an audio system with a directional array at the lateral middle of the television screen.


Numerous uses of and departures from the specific apparatus and techniques disclosed herein may be made without departing from the inventive concepts. Consequently, the invention is to be construed as embracing each and every novel feature and novel combination of features disclosed herein and limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An audio system, comprising: at least three acoustic drivers, arranged substantially in a line in a single enclosure, and separated by a non-uniform distance;a first interference directional array, comprisinga first subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating one of a left channel audio signal and a right channel audio signal; andsignal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the first subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; anda second interference directional array, comprising a second subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating the other of a left channel audio and a right channel audio signal; andsignal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the second subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions;the first subset and the second subset comprising at least one common acoustic driver, and the first subset including an acoustic driver not included by the second subset, and the second subset including an acoustic driver not included by the first subset.
  • 2. An audio system according to claim 1, wherein the distance between the two outside leftmost acoustic drivers of the first directional array is less than the distance between any other two of the acoustic drivers of the first directional array and wherein the distance between the two rightmost acoustic drivers of the second directional array is less than the distance between any other two acoustic drivers of the second directional array.
  • 3. An audio system according to claim 1, wherein the radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers face upwardly.
  • 4. An audio system according to claim 3, wherein the radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers face upwardly and backwardly.
  • 5. An audio system according to claim 1, wherein the radiating surface of the leftmost acoustic driver faces outwardly.
  • 6. An audio system according to claim 1, further comprising an acoustically opaque barrier in front of the acoustic drivers.
  • 7. An audio system according to claim 1, implemented in a television.
  • 8. An audio system according to claim 1, further comprising: a third interference directional array, comprisinga third subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers in the single enclosure, for directionally radiating a center channel audio signal, the third subset including at least one acoustic driver not included by the first subset, at least one acoustic driver not included by the second subset, at least one acoustic driver in common with the first subset and at least one acoustic driver in common with the second subset; and
  • 9. A television, comprising an audio device, comprising: at least three acoustic drivers, arranged substantially in a line in a common enclosure, and separated by a non-uniform distance;a first interference directional array, comprisinga first subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating one of a left channel audio signal and a right channel audio signal; andsignal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the first subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions; anda second interference directional array, comprising a second subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating the other of a left channel audio and a right channel audio signal; andsignal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the second subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in a direction toward a listening location is less than radiation in other directions;the first subset and the second subset comprising at least one common acoustic driver, and the first subset including at least one acoustic driver not included by the first subset and the second subset including at least on acoustic driver not included by the first subset.
  • 10. A television according to claim 9, wherein the distance between the two leftmost acoustic drivers of the first directional array is less than the distance between any other two of the acoustic drivers of the first directional array and wherein the distance between the two rightmost acoustic drivers of the second directional array is less than the distance between any other two acoustic drivers of the second directional array.
  • 11. A television system according to claim 9, wherein the radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers face upwardly.
  • 12. A television system according to claim 11, wherein the radiating surfaces of the acoustic drivers face upwardly and backwardly.
  • 13. A television system according to claim 9, wherein the radiating surface of the leftmost acoustic driver faces outwardly.
  • 14. A television system according to claim 9, further comprising an acoustically opaque barrier in front of the acoustic drivers.
  • 15. A television system according to claim 9, further comprising: a first interference directional array, comprisinga third subset of the plurality of acoustic drivers, for directionally radiating a center channel audio signal; andsignal processing circuitry to process audio signals to the third subset of acoustic drivers so that radiation from each of the acoustic drivers interferes destructively so that radiation in one direction is less than radiation in other directions.
US Referenced Citations (118)
Number Name Date Kind
1755636 Dubilier Apr 1930 A
2293181 Terman Aug 1942 A
2789651 Daniels Apr 1957 A
3378814 Butler Apr 1968 A
3486578 Albariono Dec 1969 A
3768589 Nilsson Oct 1973 A
3940576 Schultz Feb 1976 A
4340778 Cowans et al. Jul 1982 A
4616731 Robinson Oct 1986 A
4628528 Bose et al. Dec 1986 A
4747142 Tofte May 1988 A
4930596 Saiki et al. Jun 1990 A
4942939 Harrison Jul 1990 A
4965776 Mueller Oct 1990 A
5012890 Nagi et al. May 1991 A
5105905 Rice Apr 1992 A
5197100 Shiraki Mar 1993 A
5197103 Hayakawa Mar 1993 A
5261006 Nieuwendijk et al. Nov 1993 A
5280229 Faude et al. Jan 1994 A
5373564 Spear et al. Dec 1994 A
5375564 Gail Dec 1994 A
5426702 Aarts Jun 1995 A
5528694 Van De Kerkhof et al. Jun 1996 A
5610992 Hickman Mar 1997 A
5673329 Wiener Sep 1997 A
5732145 Tsao Mar 1998 A
5740259 Dunn Apr 1998 A
5802194 Yamagishi et al. Sep 1998 A
5809153 Aylward et al. Sep 1998 A
5815589 Wainwright et al. Sep 1998 A
5821471 McCuller Oct 1998 A
5828759 Everingham Oct 1998 A
5832099 Wiener Nov 1998 A
5864100 Newman Jan 1999 A
5870484 Greenberger Feb 1999 A
5881989 O'Brien et al. Mar 1999 A
5940347 Raida et al. Aug 1999 A
6002781 Takayama et al. Dec 1999 A
6067362 Lemanski et al. May 2000 A
6075868 Goldfarb et al. Jun 2000 A
6144751 Velandia Nov 2000 A
6173064 Anagnos Jan 2001 B1
6223853 Huon et al. May 2001 B1
6255800 Bork Jul 2001 B1
6275595 Lundgren et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278789 Potter Aug 2001 B1
6356643 Yamagishi et al. Mar 2002 B2
6359994 Markow et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374120 Krauss Apr 2002 B1
6415036 Ritter et al. Jul 2002 B1
6431309 Coffin Aug 2002 B1
6477042 Allgeyer et al. Nov 2002 B1
6597794 Cole et al. Jul 2003 B2
6694200 Naim Feb 2004 B1
6704425 Plummer Mar 2004 B1
6741717 Dedieu et al. May 2004 B2
6744903 Jeon et al. Jun 2004 B1
6771787 Hoefler et al. Aug 2004 B1
6820431 McManus et al. Nov 2004 B2
6870933 Roovers Mar 2005 B2
6928169 Aylward Aug 2005 B1
6963647 Krueger et al. Nov 2005 B1
7016501 Aylward et al. Mar 2006 B1
7155214 Struthers et al. Dec 2006 B2
7212467 Dobbins May 2007 B2
7283634 Smith Oct 2007 B2
7490044 Kulkarni Feb 2009 B2
7542815 Berchin Jun 2009 B1
8175311 Aylward May 2012 B2
20010001319 Beckert et al. May 2001 A1
20010031059 Borgonovo Oct 2001 A1
20010039200 Azima et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020073252 Arbiter et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085730 Holland Jul 2002 A1
20020085731 Aylward Jul 2002 A1
20020115480 Huang Aug 2002 A1
20020150261 Moeller et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020171567 Altare et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194897 Arnott et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030063767 Dedieu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20040173175 Kostun et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040204056 Phelps Oct 2004 A1
20040234085 Lennox Nov 2004 A1
20050018839 Weiser Jan 2005 A1
20050078831 Irwan et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050205348 Parker et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050239434 Marlowe Oct 2005 A1
20050255895 Lee et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060013411 Lin Jan 2006 A1
20060046778 Hembree Mar 2006 A1
20060046780 Subramaniam et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060065479 Okawa et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060134959 Ellenbogen Jun 2006 A1
20060181840 Cvetko Aug 2006 A1
20060250764 Howarth et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253879 Lin Nov 2006 A1
20070002533 Kogan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014426 Sung et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070015486 Marlowe Jan 2007 A1
20070035917 Hotelling et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036384 Struthers et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070086606 Goodwin Apr 2007 A1
20070217633 Copeland et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226384 Robbin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239849 Robbin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247794 Jaffe et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070269071 Hooley Nov 2007 A1
20070286427 Jung et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080232197 Kojima et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090016555 Lynnworth Jan 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090225992 Konagai Sep 2009 A1
20090304189 Vinton Dec 2009 A1
20100092019 Hoefler et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100290630 Berardi et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110096950 Rougas et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120121118 Fregoso et al. May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
0608937 Aug 1994 EP
0624045 Nov 1994 EP
1185094 Mar 2002 EP
1527801 May 2005 EP
1577880 Sep 2005 EP
2099238 Sep 2009 EP
2099238 Sep 2009 EP
2104375 Sep 2009 EP
1359616 Apr 1964 FR
2653630 Apr 1991 FR
631799 Nov 1949 GB
2432213 May 2007 GB
2007037058 Feb 2007 JP
9611558 Apr 1996 WO
9820659 May 1998 WO
9851122 Nov 1998 WO
2004075601 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004075601 Sep 2004 WO
2005104655 Nov 2005 WO
2006130115 Dec 2006 WO
2007007083 Jan 2007 WO
2007031703 Mar 2007 WO
2007049075 May 2007 WO
2007052185 May 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110216924 A1 Sep 2011 US