The application relates to multi-engine systems for aircraft and methods of controlling such systems.
Multi-engine helicopters are often provided with two or more gas turbine turboshaft engines connected to a main rotor via a common gearbox, and each of the engines is sized to provide power greater than what is required for cruising using both/all engines. During normal cruise operating regimes, both engines typically operate at similar power output levels (e.g. each engine provides 50% of the total power output). Attempts have however been made to operate the engines asymmetrically, that is, operating one engine at a higher power than the other. Doing so can provide overall better fuel efficiency, owing to the fact that gas turbine engines are typically optimized to run most efficiently at high power. However, the engine operating at lower power needs to be able to rapidly speed back up, when called upon. While such systems are known, improvements are desirable.
In one aspect, there is provided a multi-engine system comprising: a first turboshaft engine and a second turboshaft engine driving a common reduction gearbox that is configured to drive a common load, the second turboshaft engine configured to operate in a standby mode, at least the second turboshaft engine comprising: at least two spools independently rotatable relative to each other, a low pressure spool of the at least two spools including a low pressure shaft interconnecting a low pressure compressor section to a low pressure turbine section, and a high pressure spool of the at least two spools including a high pressure shaft interconnecting a high pressure compressor section to a high pressure turbine section; a first set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of the low pressure compressor section, the first set of variable guide vanes controlling an operating condition of the low pressure spool; and a second set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of the high pressure compressor section, the second set of variable guide vanes controlling an operating condition of the high pressure spool.
In another aspect, there is provided a turboshaft engine for a multi-engine system configured to drive a common load, the turboshaft comprising: at least two spools independently rotatable relative to each other, a low pressure spool of the at least two spools including a low pressure shaft interconnecting a low pressure compressor section to a low pressure turbine section, and a high pressure spool of the at least two spools including a high pressure shaft interconnecting a high pressure compressor section to a high pressure turbine section; a set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of each one of the at least two spools, the set of variable guide vanes configured to control an operating condition of a corresponding spool of the at least two spools; and an output shaft drivingly engaged to the low pressure shaft and configured to drivingly engage a common output shaft, the common output shaft driving the common load and being drivingly engaged by another turboshaft engine.
In a further aspect, there is provided a method of operating a multi-engine system drivingly coupled to a load, the method comprising: operating a first turboshaft engine of the multi-engine system to drive the load while a second turboshaft engine of the multi-engine system is operating in a reduced power mode; increasing an output power level of the second turboshaft engine to drive the load by: directing an airflow through a first set of variable guide vanes of the second turboshaft engine; compressing the airflow through a low pressure compressor section; directing the airflow through a second set of variable guide vanes; and compressing the airflow through a high pressure compressor section, the low pressure compressor section and the high pressure compressor section independently rotate relative to each other.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of operating a multi-engine helicopter, comprising: using full authority digital control (FADEC), controlling a first engine of the multi-engine helicopter to operate in an active mode that includes satisfying a power or rotor speed demand of the multi-engine helicopter to execute a cruise flight segment by the multi-engine helicopter; and using the FADEC, controlling a second engine of the multi-engine helicopter to maintain a fuel flow rate difference between the first and second engines to be in a range of 70% to 99.5%.
In some embodiments, the controlling the second engine is performed to maintain the fuel flow rate difference a range of 70% to 90%.
In some embodiments, the controlling the second engine is performed to maintain the fuel flow rate difference a range of 80% to 90%.
In some embodiments, the controlling the second engine is performed by using a rate of fuel flow through the second engine as a control input variable to the second engine, and the controlling the first engine is performed by using the power or rotor speed demand as a control input variable to the first engine.
In some embodiments, the controlling the first engine to operate in the active mode includes controlling the first engine to drive a rotor of the multi-engine helicopter via a gearbox of the multi-engine helicopter and controlling the second engine includes decoupling the second engine from the gearbox.
In some embodiments, the controlling the first engine to operate in the active mode includes controlling the first engine to drive a rotor of the multi-engine helicopter via a gearbox of the multi-engine helicopter and controlling the fuel flow rate difference so as to drive the gearbox with the second engine at a power in a range of 0% to 1% of a rated full-power of the second engine.
In some embodiments, method comprises modulating a first set of VGVs upstream of a low pressure compressor section of the first engine between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position independently of a position of a second set of VGVs upstream of a high pressure compressor section of the first engine.
In some embodiments, method comprises performing at least one of: a) controlling the low pressure compressor section of the second engine to maintain a pressure ratio associated with the low pressure compressor section of the second engine between 0.9 to 1.4, and b) controlling a fuel flow through the second engine to be in a range of about 20% to 10% of a simultaneous fuel flow through the first engine.
In another aspect, there is provided a multi-engine system comprising: a first turboshaft engine and a second turboshaft engine driving a common gearbox that is configured to drive a load, at least the second turboshaft engine comprising: at least two spools independently rotatable relative to each other, a low pressure spool of the at least two spools including a low pressure shaft interconnecting a low pressure compressor section to a low pressure turbine section, and a high pressure spool of the at least two spools including a high pressure shaft interconnecting a high pressure compressor section to a high pressure turbine section; a first set of variable guide vanes disposed upstream of the low pressure compressor section; and a second set of variable guide vanes disposed upstream of the high pressure compressor section, the first set of variable guide vanes being decoupled from the second set of variable guide vanes, and the low pressure compressor section including a mixed flow rotor.
In some such embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position and the second set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position.
In some such embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between the 80 degree position and the −25 degree position associated with the first set of variable guide vanes while the second set of variable guide vanes is maintained in a given position.
In some such embodiments, the multi-engine system comprises an intermediate pressure spool of the at least two spools including an intermediate pressure shaft interconnecting an intermediate pressure compressor section to an intermediate pressure turbine section, and a third set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of the intermediate pressure compressor section, the third set of variable guide vanes controlling an operating condition of the intermediate pressure spool.
In another aspect, there is provided a turboshaft engine for a multi-engine system configured to drive a common load, the turboshaft comprising: at least two spools independently rotatable relative to each other, a low pressure spool of the at least two spools including a low pressure shaft interconnecting a low pressure compressor section to a low pressure turbine section, and a high pressure spool of the at least two spools including a high pressure shaft interconnecting a high pressure compressor section to a high pressure turbine section, the low pressure compressor section being defined by a single mixed flow rotor; and a plurality of sets of variable guide vanes comprising a set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of each one of the at least two spools, a first set of the plurality of sets being mechanically decoupled from a second set of the plurality of sets.
In some such embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position associated with the first set of variable guide vanes.
In some such embodiments, the second set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position associated with the second set of variable guide vanes.
In some such embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between the 80 degree position and the −25 degree position associated with the first set of variable guide vanes while the second set of variable guide vanes is maintained in a given position.
In some such embodiments, the high pressure turbine section includes only a single turbine stage.
In some such embodiments, the turboshaft engine comprises an intermediate pressure spool of the at least two spools including an intermediate pressure shaft interconnecting an intermediate pressure compressor section to an intermediate pressure turbine section.
In some such embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is disposed upstream of the low pressure compressor section.
In some such embodiments, the second set of variable guide vanes is disposed upstream of the high pressure compressor section.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of operating a multi-engine system of a rotorcraft, comprising: during a cruise flight segment of the rotorcraft, controlling a first engine to provide sufficient power and/or rotor speed demands of the cruise flight segment; and controlling a second engine to provide a fuel flow to the second engine that is between 70% and 99.5% less than a fuel flow provided to the first engine.
In some embodiments, the fuel flow to the second engine is between 70% to 90% less than a fuel flow provided to the first engine.
In some embodiments, the fuel flow to the second engine is between 80% to 90% less than a fuel flow provided to the first engine.
In some embodiments, the step of controlling the second engine includes using the fuel flow rate to the second engine as a control input variable to a controller of the multi-engine system.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises a step of decoupling the second engine from the gearbox.
In some embodiments, the step of controlling the first engine is performed by using the power or rotor speed demand as a control input variable to the first engine and includes driving a rotor of the multi-engine rotorcraft via a common gearbox, and the step of controlling the second engine includes controlling the fuel flow rate to the second engine so that a power output of the second engine to the common gearbox remains between 0% to 1% of a rated full-power of the second engine.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises modulating a set of variable guide vanes (VGVs) upstream of a low pressure compressor of the second engine.
In some embodiments, the modulating the set of VGVs upstream of the low pressure compressor of the second engine is between a +80 degree position and a −25 degree position, and further comprising modulating a second set of VGVs upstream of a high pressure compressor of the second engine.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises controlling the low pressure compressor of the second engine to maintain a pressure ratio associated with the low pressure compressor of the second engine between 0.9 to 2.5.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises controlling a fuel flow to the second engine between 20% and 10% of a reference fuel flow to the second engine.
In another aspect, there is provided a multi-engine system for a rotorcraft comprising: a first turboshaft engine and a second turboshaft engine driving a common gearbox configured to drive a load, at least the second turboshaft engine having: a low pressure spool having a low pressure compressor and a low pressure turbine section, the low pressure compressor section including a mixed flow rotor, a high pressure spool having a high pressure compressor and a high pressure turbine section, the spools independently rotatable relative to one another, a set of variable guide vanes (VGVs) upstream of each of the low pressure and high pressure compressors, the VGVs configured to be independently operable relative to one another, and a controller configured to control fuel flow to the engines, including controlling the fuel flow to the second engine in a selected mode to be between 70% and 99.5% less than a fuel flow to the first engine.
In some embodiments, at least one set of the variable guide vanes is operable between an +80 degree position and a −25 degree position.
In some embodiments, the LP compressor variable guide vanes are operable between the +80 degree position and the −25 degree position.
In some embodiments, the multi-engine system further comprises an intermediate spool including an intermediate pressure compressor and an intermediate pressure turbine, and a third set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of the intermediate pressure compressor, the third set of variable guide vanes operable independently of the other two set of variable guide vanes.
In another aspect, there is provided a turboshaft engine for a multi-engine system configured to drive a common load, the turboshaft comprising: at least two spools independently rotatable relative to each other, a low pressure spool of the at least two spools including a low pressure shaft interconnecting a low pressure compressor section to a low pressure turbine section, and a high pressure spool of the at least two spools including a high pressure shaft interconnecting a high pressure compressor section to a high pressure turbine section, the low pressure compressor section being defined by a single mixed flow rotor; a plurality of sets of variable guide vanes comprising a set of variable guide vanes disposed at an inlet of each one of the at least two spools, a first set of the plurality of sets being mechanically decoupled from a second set of the plurality of sets, and an engine controller configured to control fuel flow to the engine to operate the engine at a rotational speed lower than an idle speed of the engine.
In some embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position associated with the first set of variable guide vanes.
In some embodiments, the second set of variable guide vanes is operable between an 80 degree position and a −25 degree position associated with the second set of variable guide vanes.
In some embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is operable between the 80 degree position and the −25 degree position associated with the first set of variable guide vanes while the second set of variable guide vanes is maintained in a given position.
In some embodiments, the high pressure turbine section includes only a single turbine stage.
In some embodiments, the turboshaft engine comprises an intermediate pressure spool of the at least two spools including an intermediate pressure shaft interconnecting an intermediate pressure compressor section to an intermediate pressure turbine section.
In some embodiments, the first set of variable guide vanes is disposed upstream of the low pressure compressor section.
In some embodiments, the second set of variable guide vanes is disposed upstream of the high pressure compressor section.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
To maintain clarity of this description, some of the same reference numerals have been used in different embodiments to show features that may be common to the different embodiments.
The turboshaft engine 10 may include a transmission 38 driven by the low pressure shaft 32 and driving a rotatable output shaft 40. The transmission 38 may optionally be provided to vary a ratio between rotational speeds of the low pressure shaft 32 and the output shaft 40. (The transmission 38, being optional, is not depicted in the examples shown in
The low pressure compressor section 12 is configured to independently rotate from the high pressure compressor section 14 by virtues of their mounting on different engine spools. The low pressure compressor section 12 may include one or more compression stages, and the high pressure compressor section 14 may include one or more compression stages. In the embodiment shown in
The LP compressor 12 and the HP compressor 14 are configured to deliver desired respective pressure ratios in use, as will be described further below. The LP compressor 12 may have a bleed valve 13 (shown schematically) which may be configured to selectively bleed air from the LP compressor 12 according to a desired control regime of the engine 10, for example to assist in control of compressor stability. The design of such valve 13 is well known and not described herein in further detail. Any suitable bleed valve arrangement may be used.
As mentioned, the HP compressor section 14 is configured to independently rotate from the LP compressor section 12 by virtue of their mounting on different engine spools. The HP compressor section 14 may include one or more compression stages, such as a single stage, or two or more stages 14A as shown in more detail in
The turboshaft engine 10 has two or more compression stages 12, 14 to pressurize the air received through an air inlet 22, and corresponding turbine stages 18, 20 which extract energy from the combustion gases before they exit via an exhaust outlet 24. In the illustrated embodiment, the turboshaft engine 10 includes a low pressure spool 26 and a high pressure spool 28 mounted for rotation about an engine axis 30. The low pressure and high pressure spools 26, 28 are independently rotatable relative to each other about the axis 30. The term “spool” is herein intended to broadly refer to drivingly connected turbine and compressor rotors, and need not mean the simple shaft arrangements depicted.
The low pressure spool 26 may include a low pressure shaft 32 interconnecting the low pressure turbine section 20 with the low pressure compressor section 12 to drive rotors of the low pressure compressor section 12. The low pressure compressor section 12 may include at least one low pressure compressor rotor directly drivingly engaged to the low pressure shaft 32, and the low pressure turbine section 20 may include at least one low pressure turbine rotor directly drivingly engaged to the low pressure shaft 32 so as to rotate the low pressure compressor section 12 at a same speed as the low pressure turbine section 20. In other embodiments (not depicted), the low pressure compressor section 12 may be connected via a suitable transmission (not depicted) to run faster or slower (as desired) than the low pressure turbine section 20.
The high pressure spool 28 includes a high pressure shaft 34 interconnecting the high pressure turbine section 18 with the high pressure compressor section 14 to drive rotor(s) of the high pressure compressor section 14. The high pressure compressor section 14 may include at least one high pressure compressor rotor (in this example, two rotors are provided, a MFR compressor 14A and a centrifugal compressor 14B) directly drivingly engaged to the high pressure shaft 34. The high pressure turbine section 18 may include at least one high pressure turbine rotor (in this example there is one HP turbine 18A) directly drivingly engaged to the high pressure shaft 34 so as to drive the high pressure compressor section 14 at a same speed as the high pressure turbine section 18. In some embodiments, the high pressure shaft 34 and the low pressure shaft 32 are concentric, though any suitable shaft and spool arrangement may be employed.
The turboshaft engine 10 may include a set of variable guide vanes (VGVs) 36 upstream of the LP compressor section 12, and may include a set of variable guide vanes (VGVs) 36 upstream of the HP compressor section 14. The first set of variable guide vanes 36A may be provided upstream of the low pressure compressor section 12. A set of variable guide vanes 36B may be provided upstream of the high pressure compressor section 14. The variable guide vanes 36A, 36B may be independently controlled by suitable one or more controllers 29, as described above. The variable guide vanes 36A, 36B may direct inlet air to the corresponding stage of compressor sections 12, 14. The set of variable guide vanes 36A, 36B may be operated to modulate the inlet airflow to the compressors in a manner which allows for improved control of the output power of the turboshaft engines 10, as described in more detail below. The VGVs may be provided with any suitable operating range. In some embodiments, VGV vanes 36B may be configured to be positioned and/or modulated between about +80 degrees and about −25 degrees, with 0 degrees being defined as aligned with the inlet airflow, as depicted schematically in
In some embodiments, the set of variable guide vanes 36A upstream of the low pressure compressor section 12 may be mechanically decoupled from the set of variable guide vanes 36B upstream of the high pressure compressor section 14, having no mechanical link between variable guide vanes 36A, 36B to permit independent operation of the respective stages. The VGV vanes 36A, 36B may be operatively controlled by the controller(s) 29 described above, to be operated independently of each other. Indeed, the engines 10A, 10B are also controlled using controller(s) 29 described above, to carry out the methods described in this document. For the purposes of this document, the term “independently” in respects of the VGVs 36 means that the position of one set of the VGV vanes (e.g. 36A) may be set without effecting any change to a position of the other set of the VGV vanes (e.g. 36B), and vice versa.
Independent control of the VGVs 36A, 36B may allow the spools 26, 28 to be operated to reduce or eliminate or reduce aerodynamic coupling between the spools 26, 28. This may permit the spools 26, 28 to be operated at a wider range of speeds than may otherwise be possible. The independent control of the VGV vanes 36A, 36B may allow the spools 26, 28 to be operated at constant speed over a wider operating range, such as from a “standby” speed to a “cruise” power speed, or a higher speed. In some embodiments, independent control of the VGVs 36A, 36B may allow the spools 26, 28 to run at speeds close to maximum power. In some embodiments, independent control of the VGVs 36A, 36B may also allow one of the spools 26, 28 to run at high speed while the other one run at low speed.
In use, the engine 10 is operated by the controller(s) 29 described above to introduce a fuel flow via nozzles 17 to the combustor 16. Combustion gases turn turbine sections 18, 20 which in turn drive the compressor sections 12, 14. The controller(s) 29 control(s) the angular position of VGVs 36A, 36B in accordance with a desired control regime, as will be described further below. The speed of the engine 10 is controlled, at least in part, by the delivery of a desired fuel flow rate to the engine, with a lower fuel flow rate causing the engine 10 to operate at a lower output speed than a higher fuel flow rate.
Such control strategies may allow for a faster “power recovery” of the engine 10 (when an engine is accelerated from a low output speed to a high output speed), possibly because the spools 26, 28 can be affected relatively less by their inherent inertia through the described use of spool 26,28 speed control using VGVs 26, as will be further described below. In some embodiments, using the vanes VGV 36A, 36B as described herein, in combination with the use of MFR-based low pressure compressor section 12 and/or MFR-based high pressure compressor section 14 may provide relatively more air and/or flow control authority and range through the core of the engine 10, and/or quicker power recovery.
Where MFR compressors 12 and/or 14 of the engines 10A, 10B are provided as described herein, the control of the VGVs 36A and/or VGV 36B provides for improved stability of engine operation. This may be so even where the VGV is operated at an extreme end of its range, such as in the “closed down” position (e.g. at a position of +80 degrees in one embodiment described herein). This control of the VGVs facilitates the ability of the engine to operate at a very low power setting, such as may be associated with a “standby” mode as described further below herein, wherein the compressor of an engine operating in standby mode is operating in a very low flow and/or low pressure ratio regime.
Turning now to
Referring still to
The gearbox 46 may have a plurality of transmission shafts 48 to receive mechanical energy from respective output shafts 40A, 40B of respective turboshaft engines 10A, 10B to direct at least some of the combined mechanical energy from the plurality of the turboshaft engines 10A, 10B to a common output shaft 50 for driving the common load 44 at a suitable operating (e.g., rotational) speed. The multi-engine system 42 may include a transmission 52 driven by the output shaft 40B and driving the rotatable transmission shaft 48. The transmission 52 may be controlled to vary a ratio between the rotational speeds of the respective output shaft 40A/40B and transmission shaft 48.
The multi-engine system 42 may be configured, for example, to drive accessories of an associated aircraft in addition to the main rotor. The gearbox 46 may be configured to permit the common load 44 to be driven by either the first turboshaft engine 10A or the second turboshaft engine 10B, or, by a combination of both the first turboshaft engine 10A and the second turboshaft engine together 10B. A clutch 53 may be provided to permit each engine 10A, 10B to be engaged and disengaged with the transmission X, as desired. For example, an engine 10A, 10B running at low- or no-power conditions may be declutched from the transmission if desired. In some embodiments, a conventional clutch may be used.
In normal operation, the engines 10A and 10B are controlled by the controller(s) 29 to introduce a fuel flow via nozzles (not shown in
According to the present description, the multi-engine system 42 driving a helicopter (H) may be operated in an asymmetric mode, in a first of the turboshaft engines (say, 10A) may be operated at high power in an active mode and the second of the turboshaft engine (10B in this example) may be operated in a low-power standby mode. For example, the first turboshaft engine 10A may be operated by the FADEC to run at full (or near-full) power conditions in the active mode, to supply substantially all or all of a required power and/or speed demand of the common load 44. The second turboshaft engine 10B may be operated by the controller(s) 29 to run at low-power or no-output-power conditions to supply substantially none or none of a required power and/or speed demand of the common load 44. The selection of which engine is active standby modes, respectively, may be as desired, and may be fixed for a given aircraft or a given flight, or may alternate between engines 10A, 10B during a flight or in successive flights.
As discussed above, asymmetric operation regime of the engines in ICR mode may be achieved through differential control of fuel flow to the engines, and corresponding control of their VGVs 36.
As a non-limiting example, and referring to
As another non-limiting example, the method 60 for controlling a multi-engine system 42 may include steps of: operating a first engine in a low power (or no power) “standby” mode in which the low pressure compressor section 12 within a pressure ratio range of 1.0 to 1.7 at constant speed, while modulating the vanes 36A upstream thereof according to an appropriate schedule. One such schedule may include a modulation range of −25 to +80 degrees, including a high closure angle (e.g. +50 to +80 degree position) for VGVs 36A, and in some such embodiments a similar range for VGVs 36B, during operation in the low pressure ratio regime of 1.0 to 1.7. In some such embodiments, the VGVs 36B may be suitably modulated between a −25 degree position and a +70 degree position. In some such embodiments, the VGVs 36B may be suitably modulated between a −20 degree position and a +50 degree position.
VGV vane scheduling may be any suitable scheduling across the operating range. In some embodiments, the VGV vane 36 position may be linearly mapped over the pressure range.
In some embodiments, the multi-engine system 42 may allow a standby engine 10 (10A or 10B) to be operated in a sustained (i.e. continuous, steady-state) reduced power mode at fuel flows in a range of about 30% down to about 12% of a “reference fuel flow” through the engine 10. The reference fuel flow may, for example, be a take-off fuel flow of the engine, or a cruise fuel flow of the engine.
In some embodiments, the airflow control authority and/or control using the VGV(s) 36 according to the described examples may allow the engine 10 to operate in a sustained (i.e. continuous, steady-state) reduced power (or in some examples materially no output power) mode at fuel flows in a range of about 20% down to about 10% of a reference fuel flow to the engine 10.
In some embodiments, the airflow control authority and/or control using the VGV(s) 36 according to the described examples may allow a reduction in the size of the bleed valve(s), for example bleed valve(s) 13, 15 (
In some embodiments, the airflow control authority and/or control using the VGV(s) 36 according to the described examples may allow a given engine 10 to be operated to with a higher HP compressor 14 speed than would otherwise be available, because a decrease in the pressure ratio and mass flow at a given speed through the HP VGV 36B and LP compressor stage 12. The control regimes described herein may allow for a more rapid increase in output engine power, and a higher acceleration rate of the HP compressor 14 from a lower speed, such as may be used in an ICR mode when the engine is in the standby mode, and may do so without assistance from an external power source such as an engine starter or other device for imparting power to the engine for HP spool acceleration.
In some embodiments, the airflow control authority and/or control using the VGV(s) 36 according to the described examples may allow a 2 stage high pressure compressor section 14 to operate at about 17-25% of its pressure ratio at design point during some standby modes, and at 40-60% corrected speed of its design point during some standby modes, through use of the described VGV 36 control.
It is understood that a single engine system such as shown in
The standby condition may be affected by operating the engine (via the controller(s) 29) at lower power conditions and/or at low fuel flow conditions. An engine run at high power and the other operated at lower power may operate more efficiently than two engines operated at 50% power for a given desired power output. Potentially the present asymmetric operation method may reduce an overall fuel consumption of the system 42, as compared to operating a conventional twin engine wherein each engine is operating at 50% power.
In use, the first turboshaft engine (say 10A) may operate in the active mode while the other turboshaft engine (say 10B) may operate in the standby mode, as described above. During this asymmetric operation, if the helicopter (H) needs a power increase (expected or otherwise), the second turboshaft engine 10B may be required to provide more power relative to the low power conditions of the standby mode, and possibly return immediately to a high- or full-power condition. This may occur, for example, in an emergency condition of the multi-engine system 42 powering the helicopter, wherein the “active” engine loses power the power recovery from the lower power to the high power may take some time. Even absent an emergency, it will be desirable to repower the standby engine to exit the asymmetric mode.
In general, a response time for power recovery from the standby mode to a higher-power normal operational mode may be reduced with the current engine design, because the use of MFR compressor(s) in comparison to typical prior art axial rotors, and/or because the use of a “split compression” arrangement with compression stages split between the LP and HP spools, results in a lower mass and inertia on each spool of the turboshaft engine 10 relative to a conventional turboshaft engine. As a result, the response time engine 10/10A/10B may be reduced relative to a typical prior art engine configuration (axial compression staged driven only by the HP spool). For example, in comparison with a baseline turboshaft engine having a compressor on the HP spool and delivering a same power as the turboshaft engine 10/10A/10B, the mass/inertia of each spool 26, 28 of the turboshaft engine 10/10A/10B may be lower than the corresponding mass/inertia of the baseline turboshaft engine.
The lower relative mass/inertia may make the turboshaft engine 10 more reactive to power or rotor speed demands in comparison to said baseline engine. The turboshaft engine 10/10A/10B may have faster acceleration to full power, which may be useful when operating the engine to recover from the standby mode to a higher-power mode, such as normal engine operating mode. Although the described and depicted embodiments of the multi-engine system 42 have identical engines 10/10A/10B, any suitable engine arrangement or combination may be employed and may include, in an example embodiment (not shown), one said baseline turboshaft engine and one turboshaft engine 10/10A/10B according to the present invention.
For example, in comparison with a baseline turboshaft engine having a single compressor spool and delivering a same power as the turboshaft engine 10, the mass of inertia of each spool 26, 28 of the turboshaft engine 10 implemented according to the architecture of the present technology may be lower than the mass of inertia of the single compressor spool of the baseline turboshaft engine. A lower mass of inertia may make the turboshaft engine 10 more reactive to power or rotor speed demands. The turboshaft engine 10 may have faster acceleration to full power from the standby mode relative to the baseline turboshaft engine. In some embodiments, the multi-engine system 42 may include the baseline turboshaft instead of the first turboshaft engine 10A.
Referring to
The low pressure compressor section 12 may include one or more compression stages driven by one or more turbine stages of the low pressure turbine section 20. For example, in the embodiment shown in
The high pressure compressor section 14 may include one or more compression stages, or a single centrifugal stage, driven by one or more turbine stages of the high pressure turbine section 18. For example, in the embodiment shown in
Referring to
Referring now to
The method 70 may include a step 72, using an engine controller 29, such as a full authority digital control (FADEC) 29 to control the engines 10A, 10B to operate asymmetrically. At step 72, the FADEC 29 may determine that the helicopter (H) is in a suitable condition for entering asymmetric mode. In step 74, the FADEC 29 may accelerate one engine (say 10A) of the multiengine system 42 from a cruise power level into an active engine mode, in which the first engine may provide a higher cruise power level and sufficient power to satisfy substantially all or all (90% or higher) of a helicopter power or rotor speed demand. At step 76, the FADEC 29 may decelerate another engine (say 10B) of the multiengine system 42 to operate in a standby mode at a power substantially lower than cruise power level, and in some embodiments at zero output power and in other embodiments less than 10% output power relative to a reference power (provided at a reference fuel flow).
To effect such control, the FADEC 29 may correspondingly control fuel flow rate to each engine 10A, 10B accordingly. In the case of the standby engine, a fuel flow (and/or a fuel flow rate) provided to the standby engine is controlled to be between 70% and 99.5% less than the fuel flow (and/or the fuel flow rate) provided to the active engine. In the asymmetric mode, the standby engine may be maintained between 70% and 99.5% less than the fuel flow to the active engine. In some embodiments of the method 60, the fuel flow rate difference between the active and standby engines may be controlled to be in a range of 70% and 90% of each other, with fuel flow to the standby engine being 70% to 90% less than the active engine. In some embodiments of the method 60, the fuel flow rate difference may be controlled to be in a range of 80% and 90%, with fuel flow to the standby engine being 80% to 90% less than the active engine.
According to Step 78 in
Alternately, in some embodiments, the step of controlling the active engine(s) may include controlling the standby engine at a power in a range of 0% to 1% of a rated full-power of the standby engine. In such an embodiment, the standby engine (say 10B) may be controlled (closed loop) by using the target output power of the engine.
In some embodiments of the method, the step 78 of controlling the active engine may include the step 80 (as shown in
In some embodiments, the controlling the active engine(s) may include controlling the active engine(s) to drive the rotor/load 44 via the gearbox 46 and controlling the fuel flow rate difference so as to drive the gearbox 46 with the standby engine(s) at a power in a range of 0% to 1% of a rated full-power of the standby engine(s).
In some embodiments, maintaining the fuel flows as described in an engine having the described combination of the MFR(s) 12, 14 and of independently modulated VGV sets 36A, 36B, or combination thereof as described above, may provide further improvements over prior art multi-engine operating regimes.
Referring again to
Referring still to
In some embodiments, the method 70 may include modulating the VGVs 36A and/or 36B of the active engine(s) and/or fuel flow to the active engine(s) to suit the particular embodiment(s) and operating conditions of the active engine(s) which may operate simultaneously with the standby engine(s).
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, the compressor rotor may comprise any suitable design, and need not include MFR rotors but rather may employ axial compressor stage(s) and/or centrifugal impeller stages also or instead. The multi-engine system may have more than two turboshaft engines, in which case any suitable number of the engines may operate in the active and standby modes, respectively.
While the description focuses on a helicopter (H), it may be applied to other types of multi-engine aircraft or power systems, such as marine and industrial power systems. The number, nature and configuration of VGV vane may be any suitable. The engine controller may be any suitable, and the methods of effecting engine control also do not form any part of this description other than as expressly provided. Although described with regard to a helicopter, the description applies to any suitable rotorcraft. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure.
The present application claims priority on the U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/715,917 filed Aug. 8, 2018, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2548975 | Hawthorne | Apr 1951 | A |
2747367 | Savin | May 1956 | A |
2929207 | Peterson | Mar 1960 | A |
2955424 | Hryniszak | Oct 1960 | A |
2984977 | Embree | May 1961 | A |
3152443 | Newland | Oct 1964 | A |
3170292 | Howes | Feb 1965 | A |
3204406 | Howes | Sep 1965 | A |
3209536 | Howes | Oct 1965 | A |
3255825 | Mouille et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3488947 | Miller | Jan 1970 | A |
3529419 | Reed | Sep 1970 | A |
3762161 | Pennig | Oct 1973 | A |
3869862 | Dickey | Mar 1975 | A |
3874811 | Dennison | Apr 1975 | A |
4055949 | Boudigues | Nov 1977 | A |
4141212 | Koschier | Feb 1979 | A |
4251987 | Adamson | Feb 1981 | A |
4252498 | Radcliffe et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4498291 | Jefferey | Feb 1985 | A |
4531694 | Soloy | Jul 1985 | A |
4611464 | Hetzer et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4678398 | Dodge et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685286 | Hetzer et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4817382 | Rudolph et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4864812 | Rodgers | Sep 1989 | A |
5159808 | Kast | Nov 1992 | A |
5161364 | Bruun et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5309708 | Stewart | May 1994 | A |
6041589 | Giffin, III et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082967 | Loisy | Jul 2000 | A |
6247668 | Reysa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6488469 | Youssef | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6855089 | Poulin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865891 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895741 | Rago et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7055303 | Macfarlane et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7168913 | Lardellier | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7500365 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7552591 | Bart et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7690185 | Linet et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707909 | Linet et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7762084 | Martis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8176725 | Norris et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8209952 | Ress, Jr. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8210800 | Suciu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220245 | Papandreas | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8231341 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8459038 | Lickfold et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8516789 | Kupratis | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568089 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621871 | McCune et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8794922 | Bart et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8853878 | White | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9062611 | Sheridan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9126691 | Cloft | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145834 | Frost et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9239004 | Kupratis et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9322341 | Belleville | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9328667 | MacFarlane | May 2016 | B2 |
9341121 | Kupratis | May 2016 | B2 |
9353848 | Blewett et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9366260 | Bradbrook et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9500138 | Cai | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9512784 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9719465 | Suciu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9745860 | Haskin | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9752500 | Ullyott et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9784182 | Dhanuka | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9819292 | Thatcher | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9828911 | Burghardt | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9890704 | Speak et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9926849 | Frost et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9932858 | Miller | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10054001 | Beutin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10072570 | Kupratis | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10094295 | Ullyott et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10125722 | Kupratis et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20020061249 | Caubet | May 2002 | A1 |
20030066294 | Mannarino | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050060983 | Lardellier | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060010152 | Catalano | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060137355 | Welch et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070240427 | Ullyott | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080081733 | Hattenbach | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080138195 | Kern | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148881 | Moniz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090015011 | Colin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090188334 | Merry | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090288421 | Zeiner | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322088 | Dooley | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100164234 | Bowman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180568 | Sachs | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212285 | Negulescu | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100281875 | Price | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287907 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110056208 | Norris | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110171030 | Swift | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185738 | Bastnagel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110284328 | Brandt | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130031912 | Finney | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056982 | Gozdawa | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130098066 | Gallet et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130139518 | Morgan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145769 | Norris et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130018605 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186058 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130255224 | Kupratis | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140069107 | Macfarlane | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140130352 | Buldtmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150401 | Venter | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140250862 | Suciu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140252160 | Suciu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140255147 | Root | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140256494 | Lewis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260295 | Ullyott et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260573 | Spanos | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140290265 | Ullyott et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297155 | Chen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150013307 | Burghardt | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150081193 | Gordon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150113996 | Cai et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150150401 | Bennett | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150167549 | Ribarov et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150176488 | Borchers | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150233302 | Levasseur | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150337738 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150369123 | Hanrahan | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377125 | Kupratis et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160040601 | Frost et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160090871 | Olsen | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160169118 | Duong | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160201490 | Scott | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160201684 | Schwarz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160208690 | Zimmitti | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215694 | Brostmeyer | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160230843 | Duong et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160245185 | Lamarre et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160290226 | Roberge | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160305261 | Orosa | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160319845 | Molnar | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160333782 | Morgan | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160333791 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160341214 | O'Toole | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170016399 | Bedrine et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170108084 | Chmylkowski | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170122122 | Lepretre | May 2017 | A1 |
20170152055 | Mercier-Calvairac et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170211477 | Menheere | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211484 | Sheridan | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170191413 | Haskin | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170247114 | Moulon et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170305541 | Vallart et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170306841 | Skertic | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170314469 | Roever | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170314474 | Wotzak | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170327241 | Mitrovic | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170356347 | Scothern et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170356452 | Mastro | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370284 | Harvey et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180016989 | Abe et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023480 | Lefebvre | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023481 | Lefebvre | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023482 | Lefebvre | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180045068 | Brinson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180058330 | Munevar | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073428 | Morgan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073429 | Dubreuil | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073438 | Durocher et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180080378 | Alecu | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180135522 | Mitrovic et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180149091 | Howell et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180163640 | Dubreuil et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180171815 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180172012 | Plante et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180187604 | Poumarede | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180202310 | Suciu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180202368 | Suciu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180208322 | Tantot | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216525 | Plante et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180223739 | Dubreuil et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180283281 | Veilleux, Jr. et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180291817 | Suciu et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313274 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180347471 | Wotzak | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190383218 | Kupratis | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2562290 | Oct 2013 | CA |
2970386 | Jan 2018 | CA |
2970389 | Jan 2018 | CA |
2975558 | Jun 2018 | CA |
0103370 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0860593 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1908938 | Apr 2004 | EP |
2226487 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2295763 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2320067 | May 2011 | EP |
1959114 | May 2012 | EP |
2602458 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2728140 | May 2014 | EP |
3043056 | Jul 2016 | EP |
3273031 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3273034 | Jan 2018 | EP |
3283369 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3273032 | Apr 2018 | EP |
3309371 | Apr 2018 | EP |
991975 | Oct 1951 | FR |
1262452 | May 1961 | FR |
1594317 | Jun 1970 | FR |
3001525 | Aug 2014 | FR |
713839 | Aug 1954 | GB |
794198 | Apr 1958 | GB |
1102591 | Feb 1968 | GB |
9502120 | Jan 1995 | WO |
2005061873 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2008045068 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2015033336 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015122948 | Aug 2015 | WO |
20150122948 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2017198999 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Veres, Joseph. A Model to Assess the Risk of Ice Accretion due to Ice Crystal Ingestion in a Turbofan Engine and its Effects on Performance, Jun. 2012, 4th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, AIAA 2012-3038. (Year: 2012). |
A New Approach to Turboshaft Engine Growth, M. A. Compagnon, General Electric Company, Lynn, Massachusetts pp. 80-41-1 to 80-41-6, May 13, 1980. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2020 for Application No. 19190869.8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200049025 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62715917 | Aug 2018 | US |