The present invention relates generally to the field of wireless communications, and particularly to the design of an antenna.
An antenna is an electrical conductor or array of conductors that radiates (transmits and/or receives) electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves are often referred to as radio waves. Most antennas are resonant devices, which operate efficiently over a relatively narrow frequency band. An antenna must be tuned to the same frequency band that the radio system operates in, otherwise reception and/or transmission will be impaired. Small antennas are required for portable wireless communications. With classical antenna structures, a certain physical volume is required to produce a resonant antenna structure at a particular radio frequency and with a particular bandwidth. Thus, traditionally bandwidth and frequency requirements dictated the volume of an antenna.
The bandwidth of an antenna refers to the range of frequencies over which the antenna can operate satisfactorily. It is usually defined by impedance mismatch but it can also be defined by pattern features such as gain, beamwidth, etc. Antenna designers quickly assess the feasibility of an antenna requirement by expressing the required bandwidth as a percentage of the center frequency of the band. Different types of antennas have different bandwidth limitations. Normally, a fairly large volume is required if a large bandwidth is desired. Accordingly, the present invention addresses the needs of small compact antenna with wide bandwidth. The present invention provides a versatile antenna design that resonates at more than one frequency, that is it is multiresonant, and that may be adapted to a variety of packaging configurations.
A magnetic dipole antenna is a loop antenna that radiates electromagnetic waves in response to current circulating through the loop. The antenna contains one or more elements. Elements are the conductive parts of an antenna system that determine the antenna's electromagnetic characteristics. The element of an magnetic dipole antenna is designed so that it resonates at a predetermined frequency as required by the application for which it is being used. The antenna's resonant frequency is dependant on the capactive and inductive properties of the antenna elements. The capacitive and inductive properties of the antenna elements are dictated by the dimensions of the antenna elements and their interelations.
The radiated electromagnetic wave from an antenna is characterized by the complex vector E×H in which E is the electric field and H is the magnetic field. Polarization describes the orientation of the radiated wave's electric field. For maximum performance, polarization must be matched to the orientation of the radiated field to receive the maximum field intensity of the electromagnetic wave. If it is not oriented properly, a portion of the signal is lost, known as polarization loss. Dependent on the antenna type, it is possible to radiate linear, elliptical, and circular signals. In linear polarization the electric field vector lies on a straight line that is either vertical (vertical polarization), horizontal (horizontal polarization) or on a 45 degree angle (slant polarization). If the radiating elements are dipoles, the polarization simply refers to how the elements are oriented or positioned. If the radiating elements are vertical, then the antenna has vertical polarization and if horizontal, it has horizontal polarization. In circular polarization two orthogonal linearly polarized waves of equal amplitude and 90 degrees out of phase are radiated simultaneously.
Magnetic dipole antennas can be designed with more than one antenna element. It is often desirable for an antenna to resonate at more than one frequency. For each desired frequency, an antenna element will be required. Different successive resonances occur at the frequencies f1, f2, fi . . . fn. These peaks correspond to the different electromagnetic modes excited inside the structure. The antenna can be designed so that the frequencies provide the antenna with a wide bandwidth of coverage by utilizing overlapping or nearly overlapping frequencies. However, antennas that have an wider bandwidth than a monoresonant antenna often have a correspondingly increased size. Thus, there is a need in the art for a multiresonant antenna; wherein the individual antenna elements share volume within the antenna structure.
The present invention relates to antennas having small volumes in comparison to prior art antennas of a similar bandwidth and type. In the present invention, the antenna elements include both capacitive and inductive parts. Each element provides a frequency or band of frequencies to the antenna.
In a preferred embodiment, the basic antenna element comprises a substantially planar structure with a planar conductor and a pair of parallel elongated conductors, each having a first end electrically connected to the planar conductor. Additional elements may be coupled to the basic element in an array. In this way, individual antenna structures share common elements and volumes, thereby increasing the ratio of relative bandwidth to volume.
The volume to bandwidth ratio is one of the most important constraints in modern antenna design. The physical volume of an antenna can place severe constraints on the design of small electronic devices. One approach to increasing this ratio is to re-use the volume for different modes. Some designs already use this approach, even though the designs do not optimize the volume to bandwidth ratio. In these designs, two modes are generated using the same physical structure, although the modes do not use exactly the same volume. The current repartition of the two modes is different, but both modes nevertheless use a common portion of the total available volume of the antenna. This concept of utilizing the physical volume of the antenna for a plurality of antenna modes is illustrated generally by the Venn Diagram of
The concept of volume reuse and its frequency dependence are expressed with reference to “K law”. The general K law is defined by the following:
Δf/f=K·V/λ3
wherein Δf/f is the normalized frequency bandwidth, λ is the wavelength, and the term V represents the physical volume that will enclose the antenna. This volume so far has not been optimized and no discussion has been made on the real definition of this volume and the relation to the K factor.
In order to have a better understanding of the K law, different K factors are defined:
Kphysical or Kobserved is the most important K factor since it takes into account the real physical parameters and the usable bandwidth. Kphysical is also referred to as Kobserved since it is the only K factor that can be calculated experimentally. In order to have the modes confined within the physical volume of the antenna, Kphysical must be lower than Keffective. However these K factors are often nearly equal. The best and ideal case is obtained when Kphysical is approximately equal to Keffective and is also approximately equal to the smallest Kmodal. It should be noted that confining the modes inside the antenna is important in order to have a well-isolated antenna.
One of the conclusions from the above calculations is that it is important to have the modes share as much volume as possible in order to have the different modes enclosed in the smallest volume possible. As previously discussed, the concept is illustrated in the Venn Diagram shown in
For a plurality of radiating modes i,
For a particular radiating mode with a resonant frequency at f1, we can consider the equivalent simplified circuit L1C1 shown in
As discussed above, in order to optimize the K factor, the antenna volume is reused for the different resonant modes. One embodiment of the present invention utilizes a capacitively loaded microstrip type of antenna as the basic radiating structure. Modifications of this basic structure will be subsequently described. In a highly preferred embodiment, the elements of the multimode antenna structures have closely spaced resonance frequencies.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to an antenna with the radiating elements and the conductor lying in substantially the same plane. The radiating elements and the planar element have a thickness that is much less then either their length or width; thus they are essentially two dimensional in nature. Preferably the antenna structure is affixed to a substrate.
In an alternative embodiment, shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of the antenna structure previously described having an essentially two-dimensional structure, in combination with another planar conductor. The second planar conductor may be located on a opposite face of the substrate. Preferably, the two planar conductors are substantially parallel to eachother.
In another embodiment, the antenna structure may utilize more than one radiating element. The radiating elements may be arranged side-by-side as showing in
Alternatively, the radiating structures may be placed in a nested configuration as shown in
In an another embodiment, the antenna structure may comprise conductors on any of the faces of the substrate. The conductors may be located in parallel and opposite arrangements or asymmetrically.
In yet another embodiment, more than one substrate may be used. As shown in
In addition, in accordance with the principles of the present invention more than one secondary substrate may be utilized.
Furthermore, the secondary substrate may be arranged in any configuration, not only in perpendicular positions.
An antenna structure in accordance with the principles of the present invention may be integrated into an electronic device. The previously discussed benefits of the present invention make such an antenna structure well suited to use in small electronic devices, for example, but not limited to mobile telephones.
In yet another alternative embodiment, the antenna structure may comprise grooves. The grooves may be partially or completely through the substrate in various locations, such as between the radiating elements.
Accordingly, while embodiments and implementations of the invention have been shown and described, it should be apparent that many more embodiments and implementations are within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the invention is not to be restricted, except in light of the claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/253,016 filed Sep. 23, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,568, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/892,928 filed Jun. 26, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,456,243, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This application relates to U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,810, titled “Multimode Grounded Finger Patch Antenna” by Gregory Poilasne et al., owned by the assignee of this application and incorporated herein by reference. This application also relates to application Ser. No. 09/781,779, is now abandoned titled “Spiral Sheet Antenna Structure and Method” by Eli Yablonovitch et al., owned by the assignee of this application and incorporated herein by reference. This application also relates to application Ser. No. 10/076,922 filed Feb. 14, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,906, 667 titled “Multifrequency Magnetic Dipole Antenna Structures for Very Low Profile Antenna Applications” by Gregory Poilasne et al., owned by the assignee of this application and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4367475 | Schiavone | Jan 1983 | A |
5184144 | Thombs | Feb 1993 | A |
5337065 | Bonnet et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5626666 | Briat et al. | May 1997 | A |
5677698 | Snowdon | Oct 1997 | A |
5754143 | Warnagiris et al. | May 1998 | A |
5790080 | Apostolos | Aug 1998 | A |
5903240 | Kawahata et al. | May 1999 | A |
5936590 | Funder | Aug 1999 | A |
5943020 | Liebendoerfer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6011519 | Sadler et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034638 | Thiel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6307520 | Liu | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339400 | Flint et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6456243 | Poilasne et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6774850 | Chen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7081854 | Ying et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20020190905 | Flint et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1296649 | May 2001 | CN |
0604338 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0757405 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0942488 | Sep 1999 | EP |
5601202 | Feb 1981 | JP |
2000 68736 | Mar 2000 | JP |
WO 1999043045 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 2001020714 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 03092118 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040233111 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09892928 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10253016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10253016 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10756884 | US |