Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to the field of magnetically released security devices. More specifically, the invention relates to magnetic decouplers that are usable with more than one type of magnetically releasable security device.
2. Background Art
There are various magnetically releasable security (antitheft) devices known in the art that are lockably coupled to an article to affix a surveillance tag to the article. The antitheft device is typically released from the article at the point of sale by using a magnetic decoupler. The most commonly used antitheft device is called a “hard tag.” See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,339,853 issued to Lipschitz. More recently, a double-pin or “double clutch” hard tag has been developed that requires a magnetic field with a greater longitudinal span than the single clutch or single pin hard tag. Examples of magnetic decouplers that can operate single clutch devices are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,959,520 and 6,084,498 issued to Stelter et al. and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Another widely used antitheft device is the “keeper box” used for CD/DVD, software and games. The keeper box requires a much wider magnetic field region to unlock. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,832,498 issued to Belden, Jr. et al. The field direction is horizontal, unlike the field for a typical hard tag, which is in the vertical direction with respect to the pin that locks the device to the article. Another example of a security device requiring a transverse magnetic field to decouple is shown in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0067971 filed by Nguyen et al.
Typically, each type of antitheft device requires a specific type of magnetic field profile to release the device from the article. The point of sale operator would therefore require various types of magnetic decouplers for use with the various antitheft devices.
There is a need for a multifunction magnetic decoupler that is operable with various antitheft devices.
A magnet assembly according to one aspect of the invention for decoupling a plurality of different types of magnetically operated security devices includes a center pole magnet having a magnetic orientation along a first direction. A plurality of magnets adjacent to and surrounding the center pole magnet define an opening above the center pole magnet. Each adjacent magnet has a magnetic orientation orthogonal to the first direction. An end pole magnet is disposed adjacent to one of the magnets adjacent to the center pole magnet. The end pole magnet has magnetic orientation opposed to the first direction.
A magnet assembly for decoupling a plurality of types of magnetically operable security devices according to another aspect of the invention includes a center pole magnet having a substantially rectangular cross section and a magnetic orientation in a selected direction. A magnet is placed in contact with opposed sides of the center pole magnet. Endmost magnets are in contact with the opposed side magnets and the center pole magnet. The opposed side magnets and the endmost magnets each have magnetic orientation orthogonal to any other magnet in contact therewith.
The magnetic orientations of the magnets in the foregoing are selected to enable operation of at least two of a single clutch hard tag, a double clutch hard tag and a keeper box magnetically operated security device.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
The present invention relates to an improved magnetic decoupler for use with a plurality of different types of magnetically releasable antitheft devices. The magnetic decoupler of the invention includes a plurality of magnets arranged with their magnetic orientations orthogonal to each other to increase the axial magnetic field gradient (axial magnetic field and its gradient) within a cavity formed by the magnetic decoupler. The gradient (the magnetic field and its gradient) is increased by superposition of the magnetic fields of each magnet.
1. Quadrature Magnets
Magnets arranged in quadrature (referred to for convenience herein as “quadrature magnets” or a “quadrature magnet assembly”) are configured so that the magnetic orientation of each magnet is orthogonal to that of adjacent magnets. Such magnet configuration can provide an important performance improvement for applications using magnet assemblies, depending on the required magnetic flux density. Quadrature magnets result in greater force to weight ratio in Lorenz force applications and even greater improvements in force applications depending on magnetic attraction or repulsion, i.e., where force is proportional to flux density squared. Quadrature magnets also provide improved magnetic field shapes in applications where, as in the present invention, optimal flux density gradients are desired. Quadrature magnet assemblies have been made possible by the development of “square” magnet materials. Square magnet materials have essentially a straight line in the second quadrant of the hysteresis curve, where the intrinsic coercivity value (as measured in Oersteds) exceeds the value of residual induction (as measured in Gauss). Magnets made of ferrite, samarium cobalt, and neodymium iron boron are currently the most widely used magnet materials of this type. Prior to the development of the foregoing “square” magnet materials it was impractical to use a quadrature magnet assembly because each magnet in an assembly not using such materials would demagnetize adjacent magnets to some extent when the magnet's induction exceeded the intrinsic coercivity of the adjacent magnets.
Individual magnet geometry is a major factor in selecting an application in which a quadrature magnet assembly is used because the individual magnet geometry establishes the operating point of the magnet. Individual magnet geometry establishes the self-demagnetizing factor of the magnet. Intrinsic coercivity less the value of the self-demagnetizing field determines the value of the external demagnetizing field the magnet can withstand without permanent loss of field strength. Magnetic circuit geometry determines the effectiveness of a group of magnets and ferrous components arranged to work together.
2. Specific Examples
According to the present invention, a powerful magnetic structure having a strong axial field as well as a long range transverse field (i.e., orthogonal to the axial field) is provided. With reference to
In the present example, another quadrature magnet 16A is located adjacent to one of the adjacent magnets, 16B in the present example, to the center pole magnet 16E. The endmost quadrature magnet 16A is oriented so that its magnetic field direction is opposite to the center pole magnet 16E. The assembly of quadrature magnets shown at 16A and 16B induces a transverse magnetic field that can be used to decouple, for example, a keeper box.
The magnets, 16A through 16F, may be assembled in a non-magnetic enclosure 20 formed from, for example, non-magnetic stainless steel, plastic or other non-ferromagnetic material. In some examples, the magnets may be underlain by a baseplate 18 formed from non-ferromagnetic material. In some examples, the baseplate 18 material can be magnetic to assist shielding of magnetic flux on the back side of the magnet assembly. The magnets and the insert 12 may be enclosed at the upper end of the decoupler 10 by a cover plate 14 formed form non-ferromagnetic material. The magnets, as explained above, may be made from a “square” magnet material such as ferrite, samarium cobalt or neodymium iron boron.
In a typical “double clutch” hard tag security device, two clutch pins are separated by a selected distance, typically 0.75 inch to one inch. With reference to
Regions with respect to the cover plate (14 in
With reference to
In another example shown in exploded view in
In another example shown in
A similar example is shown in
A magnet assembly as explained herein can operate a plurality of different types of magnetically operated security devices.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Priority is claimed from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/143,890 filed on Jan. 12, 2009.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61143890 | Jan 2009 | US |