The present invention relates generally to optical networks, and more particularly to multi-wavelength laser technology.
Multi-wavelength lasers (MWLs) are useful in providing multiple-channel light sources for optical networks, especially for dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) systems. The desirable features of MWLs used for DWDM systems include compact design, high stability in output wavelengths and wavelength spacing, reasonable output power, wide wavelength range and narrow linewidth for a large channel capacity, convenience of modulating individual wavelength at a high rate, and easiness of manufacture. In addition, the wavelength-locking mechanisms of MWLs should be as simple as possible. No existing MWL provides all those features largely because of the limitations in current laser technologies.
A number of MWL technologies have been investigated, and they can be generally classified into two types: MWL array and shared-gain MWLs. An MWL array consists of a row of single-wavelength lasers such as distributed feedback (DFB) lasers and distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) lasers. Each DFB or DBR laser in the laser array can be tuned and locked in a channel, and modulated individually.
One of unsolved problems with DFB or DBR MWLs is uneven wavelength drifting that can cause cross-talks. The output wavelength of a channel depends upon the combined effects of junction temperature and injection currents (diode pumping current, wavelength tuning current, and phase shifting current). The channel tuning mechanisms of current MWL arrays are very complex. Since the output wavelength of an individual laser in the array is a function of its junction temperature, any fluctuation in the temperature of the diode will cause its output wavelength to drift. To keep output wavelengths locked in their channels, it is essential to maintain the junction temperature constant. Heat sinks capable of precisely controlling temperature are ordinarily used to keep output wavelengths stable. Also, the costs for making such laser arrays are very high.
In shared-gain MWLs, laser channels share one gain region by integrating multi-resonance feedback elements with one gain media, thereby yielding a number of output wavelengths. One of the advantages of this design is stable output wavelength spacing even when all output wavelengths drift simultaneously. It is more difficult to modulate individual channels for most of the existing shared-gain MWLs than for MWL arrays. U.S. Pat. No. 6,289,032 discloses a self-collimating MWL laser, which simultaneously permits broad-beam collimation and monomode operation, with simultaneous emission of multiple wavelengths from a single aperture. While this design results in stable wavelength spacing, it does not allow direct or internal modulation of each individual wavelength. This design may have a limited channel capability.
The objective of this invention is to provide a multi-group multi-wavelengths laser source for optical networks especially for DWDM optical fiber communication systems. The laser system disclosed in this invention has several advantages over conventional DFB and DBR lasers. In one aspect, it has a large channel capacity. In another aspect, it is thermally and electrically stable in output wavelengths and channel spacing. In addition, the laser system can have a selectable bandwidth as broad as the full gain spectrum of the active medium. Finally, it is cost-effective in production.
The basic elements of the invented laser system include a group of active waveguides arranged in a matrix form for providing optical gain, a wavelength selectable optical device that is able to selectively feed back lights with different wavelengths, and an optical pumping mechanism or module for causing electron-population inversion in the active waveguides. The active waveguides used in the exemplary embodiments include optically active fibers and glass-based or crystal-based active waveguides. A fiber can be made optically active by doping it with rare earth elements such as erbium and erbium/ytterbium (Er/Yb).
In one of the embodiments, the active waveguides are erbium-doped fibers.
An optical cavity is formed in a piece of erbium-doped fiber by making the facets at both ends highly reflective. This can be done by traditional methods such as thin-film coating and distributed Bragg grating. If the gain of light in a round trip in the optical cavity is bigger than optical loss, a fiber laser is formed. Since the technique of fabricating erbium/ytterbium (Er/Yb) doped fibers is well developed, they are used in the embodiment.
In contrast to the shared-gain MWL designs, this invention uses a wavelength selectable optical device (
The principle upon which the wavelength selectable optical device works as a wavelength selectable feedback mirror is guided-mode resonance. Guided-mode resonance occurs in waveguide gratings where guided modes that would be supported by the waveguide without refractive index modulation are possible. However, since there is a periodic modulation or perturbance of the refractive index in or around the waveguide layer, the propagation constant βi (See following Equation 2) becomes a complex number and the imaginary part of βi cannot be neglected. Thus, the waveguide modes cannot propagate without loss in the waveguide. This structure is called a “leaky” structure because the energy from the guided modes does not propagate within the waveguide but leaks out of the structure. In this “leaky” structure, the energy of the incident optical wave is “fed” by the diffractive element into the periodically modulated or perturbed waveguide, then the “leaky” mode is coupled into certain space-harmonic waves, which are propagating waves. However, due to the phase-matching conditions, the “feeding” is strongly selective with respect to the incident wavelength, the angle of incidence, and the polarization state of the incident wave. Only the energy from the incident wave that strictly satisfies the resonance conditions can be fed into the structure. For the visible and near infrared range, the grating period Λ is in most cases in the sub-micron scale to allow only zero diffraction orders to propagate in reflection and transmission while all higher order waves are cut off. In this case, 100% reflection can be obtained at a desired narrow wavelength range. The bandwidth is typically less than a few nanometers while side bands have low reflectivity. Thus, the optical device can be used as a wavelength selectable mirror.
The guided-mode resonance phenomenon is well described by the rigorous coupled-wave theory (S. S. Wang, R. Magnusson, J. S. Bagby, and M. G. Moharam, “Guided-mode resonances in planar dielectric-layer diffraction gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 8, pp. 1470–1475, August 1990; S. S. Wang and R. Magnusson, “Multilayer waveguide-grating filters,” Appl. Opt., Vol. 34, pp. 2414–2420, May 1995; and T. K. Gaylord and M. G. Moharam, “Analysis and applications of optical diffraction by gratings,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 73, pp. 894–937, May 1985). The coupled-wave equations governing wave propagation in the waveguide can be expressed as
where Ŝi(z) is the amplitude of the inhomogeneous plane wave of the i-th space harmonic, k=2π/λ is the free space wave number, Δε=(εH−εL)/2 is the permittivity modulation, εg={overscore (εg)}(X)=(εH+εL)/2 is the average permittivity of th waveguide layer, Λ is the grating period, and λ is the free-space wavelength. As Δε→0 (weak modulation), allowing
βi=k(εg1/2 sin θ−iλ/Λ), (2)
equation (1) becomes
Equation (3) has the same appearance as the wave equation associated with an unmodulated slab waveguide. Similar to the eigenvalue of the unmodulated slab waveguide, the corresponding eigenvalue equation of the modulated waveguide is, in this limit,
for TE polarization, and is
for TM polarization, where κi=√{square root over (εgk2−βi2)}, γi=√{square root over (, βi2−ε1k2)}, and δi=√{square root over (βi2−ε3k2)}. Equations (4) and (5) can be used to predict approximately the wavelength and incident angle location of the resonance for a given structure. The propagation constant, βi, of the waveguide grating in the limit of Δε→0 is thus determined explicitly by the basic waveguide grating parameters, grating period Λ, average permittivity of the waveguide layer, εg, the thickness of the waveguide layer, incident angle, θ, the free space wavelength, λ, and mode index i.
The spectral response of a guided-mode resonant reflective filter predicted by this theory is very close to the ones obtained experimentally (See “High-efficiency guided-mode resonance filter”, Z. S. Liu, S. Tibuleac, D. Shin, P. P. Young, and R. Magnusson, Optics Letters, Vol. 23, No. 19, Oct. 1, 1998). The peak reflection wavelength of a wavelength selectable optical device is determined by parameters such as grating periods, grating fill factors, refractive indices (the square of permittivity) of the substrate, waveguide, and grating layers, input medium, and the thickness of the waveguide layer at the position where the resonant modes occur. Any changes in these parameters will cause a shift in the wavelength of the peak reflection. Thus, when those parameters are non-uniform, the wavelength selectable optical device is able to reflect different wavelengths at different positions along the non-uniform direction. The most convenient parameters for achieving various peak reflection wavelengths are the thickness of the waveguide layer and the grating period of the grating. Making a waveguide layer with non-uniform refractive indices is more complicated, but existing techniques can be modified for this purpose. Equations (4) and (5) can also be used to estimate the peak reflection wavelength for any point on a wavelength selectable optical device with multiple non-uniform device parameters.
a illustrates a qualitative relationship between the peak reflection wavelengths of the optical device and the positions on the optical device.
Theoretical reflection spectra of an optical device with non-uniform grating periods are shown in
While the two computations are conducted for cases involving only one varying device parameter, it is obvious to predict reflection wavelengths for an optical device with more than one varying parameter in any direction along the optical device.
The number of output wavelengths is determined by the number of active waveguides and their layout in the matrix. The active waveguides are identical to each other except they are located in different locations so that the lights from them are able to strike the different part of area on the optical device. Of course, the output wavelength range of the laser matrix must fall within the gain spectrum of the active waveguides.
The output wavelength spacing between two adjacent lasers depends upon the degree of the non-uniformity of relevant parameters of the optical device and the distance between two adjacent active waveguides at a point near the optical device. The wavelength spacing can be arbitrarily small because the difference in the parameters between two adjacent active waveguides can be arbitrarily small.
All layers of the wavelength selectable optical device can be made of dielectric materials such as SiO2, Si3N4, HfO2, Al2O3, and TiO2 or semiconductor materials such as Si, InP, GaAs, AlGaAs, and InGaAsP. To improve the line shapes of its reflection spectra, the wavelength selectable optical device may further include any or all of the following three components: a thin-film layer on top of the grading surface, a thin-film layer between the grating layer and the waveguide layer, and a thin-film layer between the waveguide layer and the substrate.
The wavelength selectable optical device can be externally mounted to the body containing an active waveguide matrix to form external optical cavities. An optical device can be assembled with one of its surfaces facing one of the light-emitting facets of the active waveguides, with a micro-lens matrix placed between the optical device and the active waveguides.
The wavelength selectable optical device used in the present invention is a passive element. No injection current flows through it. Thus, the refractive indices of all layers of materials of the device are stable. Since the output wavelengths depend only upon the positions on the device, the output wavelengths of the laser matrix will be stable even when the powers of pumping lights are varied. Furthermore, the device can be fabricated using materials with high thermal stability, thus the output wavelengths of the laser matrix are thermally stable as well.
In summary, a multi-group multi-wavelength laser matrix is achieved by using a wavelength selectable optical device as a shared feedback mirror in one of the end facets of a laser matrix consisting of identical active waveguides. The laser system can provide multiple signal channels for multiple optical fibers. The outputs from the laser matrix feature single-mode, narrow-linewidths, highly polarized beams, arbitrary wavelength spacing, high thermal and electrical stability, and low divergence. Those features make this invented laser system a good laser source for optical networks, especially for DWDM systems.
a illustrates qualitative reflection spectra of a wavelength selectable optical device.
b illustrates a schematic view of a wavelength selectable optical device.
a illustrates reflection spectra predicted for a wavelength selectable optical device containing a waveguide layer of non-uniform thickness.
b illustrates the thickness profile of the wavelength selectable optical device used in
a illustrates reflection spectra predicted for a wavelength selectable optical device containing a grating layer with non-uniform grating periods in one direction.
b illustrates the grating period profile of the wavelength selectable optical device used in
a illustrates the wavelength output map of a fiber laser matrix where the end facets are arranged in a square form.
b illustrates the wavelength output map of a fiber laser matrix where the end facets are arranged in a triangle form.
In one of the embodiments, active waveguides used in a laser matrix are erbium-doped optical fibers. The optical cavities of the fiber laser matrix are formed by attaching one end of an erbium-doped fiber bundle to a wavelength selectable device and by coating the other end of the fiber bundle with a thin-film stack of high reflectivity. The thin-film layer has a reflection peak centered at wavelength of 1.55 μm.
The optical device has different peak reflection wavelengths at different positions on the optical device, and each fiber laser has an output wavelength corresponding to the peak reflection wavelength of the optical device at the corresponding position. When such a system is pumped by 0.98 μm or 1.48 μm pumping light, it can generate laser outputs with multi-group multi-wavelengths. Each fiber laser in the laser matrix can be designed to possess a single-mode, highly polarized, and narrow-linewidth output. Of course, all the output wavelengths are within the gain spectrum of the erbium-doped fibers.
The detailed structure of the fiber laser matrix is shown in
The wavelength output map for this specific embodiment is illustrated in
The end-facet layout in the end-facet matrix can also be arranged with the maximum fill factor (to occupy the least volume) as shown in
In the third example of the embodiments, the concept of this invention is extended to diode-pumped crystal laser. Shown in
A laser matrix using a wavelength selectable optical device may serve as a laser source for DWDM systems. The disclosed MWL matrix in this invention features compact size, high stability in output wavelengths and wavelength spacing, broad wavelength selectivity, convenience of use, and low costs for mass production. When a fixed manufacturing process is developed for mass production, individual units are expected to achieve uniform performance characteristics. By designing the profile of non-uniform parameters for a wavelength selectable optical device, each reflection wavelength for a corresponding laser unit can be locked into a particular wavelength channel. For a wavelength selectable optical device that is designed to have a linear relation between its peak reflection wavelength and its position in one direction, the output wavelengths may be shifted by changing the position of the optical device along the row direction of the laser matrix. This method may be useful in some situations to correct errors in designing and fabricating the optical device.
The wavelength selectable optical device can be fabricated using existing techniques. Methods of fabricating grating on a surface are art known by those skilled in the art. Typical techniques include holographic interference, phase mask, electron beam writing, and laser-beam writing. Electron beam writing and laser-beam writing can be used to fabricate gratings with varying grating periods. Thin-film deposition, a well-known technique, can be used for fabrication of the waveguide layer. Taped or stepped waveguide layer can be fabricated by using thin-film deposition technique in combination with a precisely controlled moving mask on the deposited surface. Perhaps, selective etching process may be used to create non-uniform structures (U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,975 to Wu, et al.). Layers with non-uniform refractive indices may be made by thin-film deposition using two or more material sources. Other components such as active waveguides and light-pumping modules are commercially available.
In the exemplary embodiments of the invention, specific components, arrangements, and assemble processes are used to describe the invention. Obvious changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made by those skilled in the art to achieve the same objectives of this invention. The exemplary embodiments are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The present invention is intended to cover all other embodiments that are within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/253,004, filed Nov. 27, 2000.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US01/44004 | 11/21/2001 | WO | 00 | 4/21/2003 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO02/43202 | 5/30/2002 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4645293 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4873691 | Uomi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4885753 | Okai et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 5216680 | Magnusson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5598300 | Magnusson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 6154480 | Magnusson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6289032 | Fay et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050100060 A1 | May 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60253004 | Nov 2000 | US |