This application generally relates to the structure of microfluidic devices.
In one of the methods for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and/or High Resolution Melt (HRM) sample analysis, reagents are introduced into micro-channels of a microfluidic device to test the samples, where the micro-channels are repeatedly refilled. Since the reagent needs to remain still in the micro-channel during testing, a capillary force is usually used to retain the reagent within the sample inlet.
In one technique, the micro-channel is initially filled with a first reagent. A pipette is then used to form a droplet of a second reagent, where the pipette dispenses the droplet via a sample inlet hole. The micro-channel is connected with a pump via an outlet hole, where the first and second reagents are vacuumed out in order to introduce a sample reagent. The droplet continues to be pulled into the micro-channel until the air-liquid interface of the second reagent is formed at the sample inlet hole. The air-liquid interface is retained because the vacuum pressure is under a Laplace pressure. Repeating the above-described process enables several test samples to be introduced into the micro-channel for analysis.
One issue with the above-described process is that the sample inlet hole size can be smaller than the droplet size, making it difficult to drop droplets via the smaller sized sample inlet hole. One solution to this issue is to align the tip of the pipette to the sample inlet using guide fixtures and/or pipette tips. This can result in a cost increase. Another solution is to enlarge the size of the sample inlet hole. However, in increasing the size, the smaller the Laplace pressure becomes, resulting in a decrease in the flow velocity of the reagent, which results in an increase in processing time. Also the smaller Laplace pressure becomes harder to control with a feedback loop and has an increased risk of breaking the air-liquid interface
What is needed is a microfluidic introduction system that addresses and overcomes the above described issues.
According to at least one aspect of the present disclosure, a microfluidic device includes at least one inlet hole located on an inlet side of the microfluidic device, the inlet hole consisting of a plurality of holes with diameters smaller in size than a diameter of the at least one inlet hole, at least one outlet hole located on an outlet side of the microfluidic device opposite the inlet side, and a micro-channel, wherein the plurality of holes are connected to the micro-channel.
The following paragraphs describe certain exemplary embodiments. Other embodiments can include alternatives, equivalents, and modifications. Additionally, the exemplary embodiments can include several novel features, and a particular feature may not be essential to some embodiments of the devices, systems, and methods that are described herein.
The following description is an example of applying an exemplary structure of the multi hole inlet structure 105 compared to a known single hole inlet structure, and the advantages provided by the multi hole inlet structure 105. In the following example, the described inlet structures are illustrated/discussed described as being tapered. In another exemplary embodiment, the inlet structures are not tapered. In additional exemplary embodiments, the concavity of the sample inlet hole area 104 can be varied to enable various degrees of capturing the contents of the droplet deposited by the pipette 110.
As previously described, the microfluidic device 100 is connected to an external pump 107 via an outlet hole 108 of the microfluidic device 100. The external pump 107 is used to vacuum out the reagent 106 currently occupying the micro-channel 102 from the micro-channel 102. In the process of vacuuming out reagent 106, reagent 111 is vacuumed into the micro-channel 102 from the sample inlet hole area 104 via the multi hole inlet structure 105. More specifically, the reagent 111 is vacuumed into the micro-channel 102 through each of the holes of the multi hole inlet structure 105.
The reagent 111 continues to be pulled into the micro-channel 102 until an air-liquid interface of the reagent 111 is formed at the multi hole inlet structure 105. In this situation, the Laplace pressure at the multi hole inlet structure 105 becomes larger compared to the Laplace pressure at the single hole inlet structure 405. The vacuum pressure required is determined by the largest hole diameter of the holes inside the sample inlet hole area 104, which becomes the smallest Laplace pressure.
The following is an example to evaluate the Laplace pressure of the single inlet hole structure 405 with the Laplace pressure of the multi hole inlet structure 105. To evaluate the Laplace pressure, the total surface area of the single hole inlet structure 405 and the multi hole inlet structure 105 are aligned to 0.16 mm2, which is the total surface area obtained based on the measurements described above with respect to
The following steps are applicable to both the microfluidic device of
As in the above-description associated with microfluidic device 100, in the present exemplary embodiment, microfluidic device 200 is connected to an external pump 107 via an outlet hole 207. The external pump 107 is used to vacuum out a reagent currently occupying the micro-channel 204 from the micro-channel 204. In the process of vacuuming out the reagent, another reagent deposited into the well 201 is vacuumed from the well into the micro-channel 204 via the single hole inlet 202. More specifically, the reagent is vacuumed into the micro-channel 204 through each channel of the multi-channel structure that makes up the partition 203. In this case, the reagent continues to be pulled into the micro-channel 204 until an air-liquid interface of the reagent is formed at the end of the multi-channel structure.
The above described exemplary embodiments have discussed and illustrated the holes in the multi hole inlet structure 105 as circular. These exemplary embodiments are not seen to be limiting with respect to the shape of the holes in the multi hole inlet structure 105 inlet hole area structure.
The scope of the following claims is not limited to the above-described embodiments and includes various modifications and equivalent arrangements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100159590 | Alley | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110104688 | Sundberg | May 2011 | A1 |
20130001145 | Yin | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130139895 | Vangbo | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130345096 | Wan | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140179021 | Parkinson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20190001237 | Collins | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200124508 | Mendoza | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2799139 | Apr 2001 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Chung, A hybrid microfluidic-vacuum device for direct interfacing with conventional cell culture methods. BMC Technology. (Year: 2007). |
FR_2799139_A1_l_tranlsation . Yves et al. (Year: 2001). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200030800 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |