Cross referenced and commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 12/034,197, filed Feb. 20, 2008 and entitled MULTI-JOB FEEDER APPARATUS AND METHOD by Joseph S. Vetromile and Kenneth P. Moore, now Publication No. 20090206153, and is included in its' entirety herein by reference.
This invention relates in general to an image forming apparatus, and more particularly, to an image forming apparatus employing a multi-job feeder tray.
Conventionally, a feeder module in a high-speed imaging apparatus includes two or more sheet capacity media supplies. One paper type in a tray at a time is intended to be loaded, therefore, requiring unloading and reloading with changing paper requirements as the job necessitates. This causes significant delays between jobs, especially for short job lengths. To minimize delay time, operators have been stacking multiple job stacks of different paper types on top of each other separated by a job divider of various types. This requires trays to be opened to have residual paper and dividers removed after each job, which reduces productivity. In some cases, paper is used up before job completion causing an operator induced shut down (misfeed) when there is an attempt to feed thick dividers.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,488,458 discloses a duplex printing integrity system for insuring that correctly matching pages are being printed by a duplex printer on the opposing first and second sides of sheets. The printer is operable to selectively print marks along the sheets and optical sensors on opposite sides of the sheets are used to detect the marks and send signals to a comparison circuit that continuously compares the sensor output signals to provide a duplex printing error signal when the sensors provide different output signals. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,457,651 B2 a dual level encryption method, and document, is provided for obtaining a substantially increased amount of optically readable information from an otherwise conventional and highly visible printed bar-code pattern area on a document without interfering with the conventional optical reading of the conventional information in the bar-code.
While disclosures of the above-mentioned patents are useful, they do not answer the operator intervention problem presented when feeding multiple types of paper and printing jobs from a paper feed tray.
Accordingly, a system is disclosed for stacking different types of same-sized sheets for multiple jobs in a paper feed tray and allowing job streaming without operator intervention and thereby improving productivity and reducing operator induced shut-downs that includes: manually programming each print job into the printer's controller to be run corresponding with the order of media loaded in the paper feed tray; providing a unique, printed or punched pattern on low cost, job divider sheets; loading the divider sheets into the sheet supply with their corresponding sheet stack; and providing a conventional digital sensor at the sheet supply that reads each divider sheet printed or punched pattern through holes in the divider sheets as they exit the paper feed tray. No divider sheet is needed for the first job. Once the first divider sheet is sensed (second job), it is then fed to a predetermined output tray before the job starts. When the job is complete, remaining paper for that job is fed (optionally, at high speed) to the predetermined output tray with the corresponding divider sheet for reuse later. If too few sheets were loaded for the job, the feeder will cause a soft cycle down when it sees the pattern on the next job divider sheet and flag the problem. Alternatively, an option could be included, such that, if a job is running and the next divider sheet pattern is seen before the job is completed (i.e., a misfeed and soft shut down occurs), the system will flag the operator on the user interface (not shown), and use the next patterned divider sheet to continue running the jobs.
The disclosed reprographic system that incorporates the disclosed improved system for stream feeding sheets for multiple jobs from a feed tray may be operated by and controlled by appropriate operation of conventional control systems. It is well-known and preferable to program and execute imaging, printing, paper handling, and other control functions and logic with software instructions for conventional or general purpose microprocessors, as taught by numerous prior patents and commercial products. Such programming or software may, of course, vary depending on the particular functions, software type, and microprocessor or other computer system utilized, but will be available to, or readily programmable without undue experimentation from, functional descriptions, such as, those provided herein, and/or prior knowledge of functions which are conventional, together with general knowledge in the software of computer arts. Alternatively, any disclosed control system or method may be implemented partially or fully in hardware, using standard logic circuits or single chip VLSI designs.
The term ‘sheet’ herein refers to any flimsy physical sheet of paper, plastic, or other useable physical substrate for printing images thereon, whether precut or initially web fed. A compiled collated set of printed output sheets may be alternatively referred to as a document, booklet, or the like. It is also known to use interposers or inserters to add covers or other inserts to the compiled sets.
As to specific components of the subject apparatus or methods, or alternatives therefor, it will be appreciated that, as normally the case, some such components are known per se' in other apparatus or applications, which may be additionally or alternatively used herein, including those from art cited herein. For example, it will be appreciated by respective engineers and others that many of the particular components mountings, component actuations, or component drive systems illustrated herein are merely exemplary, and that the same novel motions and functions can be provided by many other known or readily available alternatives. All cited references, and their references, are incorporated by reference herein where appropriate for teachings of additional or alternative details, features, and/or technical background. What is well known to those skilled in the art need not be described herein.
Various of the above-mentioned and further features and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the specific apparatus and its operation or methods described in the example(s) below, and the claims. Thus, they will be better understood from this description of these specific embodiment(s), including the drawing figures (which are approximately to scale) wherein:
While the disclosure will be described hereinafter in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that limiting the disclosure to that embodiment is not intended. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
The disclosure will now be described by reference to a preferred embodiment xerographic printing apparatus that includes a method of loading multiple types of same sized paper in a feed tray to allow printing of multiple jobs without operator intervention.
For a general understanding of the features of the disclosure, reference is made to the drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals have been used throughout to identify identical elements.
Referring now to printer 10 in
Subsequently, charger 22 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 24 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit Y, which deposits yellow toner on charged areas of the belt.
Subsequently, charger 26 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 28 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit C, which deposits cyan toner on charged areas of the belt.
Subsequently, charger 30 charges the area of belt 14 to a relatively high, substantially uniform potential. Next, the charged area of belt 14 passes laser 32 to expose selected areas of belt 14 to a pattern of light, to discharge selected areas to produce an electrostatic latent image. Next, the illuminated area of the belt passes developer unit K, which deposits black toner on charged areas of the belt.
As a result of the processing described above, a full color toner image is now moving on belt 14. In synchronism with the movement of the image on belt 14, a conventional registration system receives copy sheets from sheet feeder module 100 through interface module 50 and brings the copy sheets into contact with the image on belt 14. Sheet feeder module 100 includes high capacity feeders 102 and 104 that feed sheets from sheet stacks 106 and 108 positioned on media supply trays 107 and 109 into interface module 50 that directs them either to purge tray 118 through sheet feed path 52 or to imaging or marking module 12 through sheet feed path 54. Additional high capacity media trays could be added to feed sheets along sheet path 120, if desired.
A corotron 34 charges a sheet to tack the sheet to belt 14 and to move the toner from belt 14 to the sheet. Subsequently, detack corotron 36 charges the sheet to an opposite polarity to detack the sheet from belt 14. Prefuser transport 38 moves the sheet to fuser E, which permanently affixes the toner to the sheet with heat and pressure. The sheet then advances to stacker module F, or to duplex loop D.
Cleaner 40 removes toner that may remain on the image area of belt 14. In order to complete duplex copying, duplex loop D feeds sheets back for transfer of a toner powder image to the opposed sides of the sheets. Duplex inverter 90, in duplex loop D, inverts the sheet such that what was the top face of the sheet, on the previous pass through transfer, will be the bottom face on the sheet, on the next pass through transfer. Duplex inverter 90 inverts each sheet such that what was the leading edge of the sheet, on the previous pass through transfer, will be the trailing on the sheet, on the next pass through transfer.
With further reference to the
Alternatively, while a method and apparatus has been disclosed embedded within a printer for stacking different types of same-sized sheets for multiple jobs in a paper supply and allowing job streaming without operator intervention, it should be understood that this capability could be offered as an option. Also, it should be understood that any or all feeders could utilize the same purge tray 118 through media paths 120 and 52.
In recapitulation, a system for loading multiple types of same size paper in a feed tray to allow printing of multiple jobs without operator intervention is enabled by providing low cost, job divider sheets for multiple jobs that include holes or simple printed bars. The job divider sheets are loaded into the paper supply tray on top of appropriate sized sheets for each job. A conventional digital sensor is used for sensing the divider information. The operator is always instructed to include more paper than is required for each job. The first job does not need a divider sheet and the job is started. When the job is completed the remaining paper is fed to the specified output tray for later use. If there are too few sheets for the job, the divider sheet for the next job is detected and the job will stop and the system will declare a problem, and optionally, could alert the operator of the problem, for example, through a user interface, and continue feeding the remaining jobs. The operator could finish the first job at a later time. Alternatively, if paper is remaining after the first job is finished, the unused paper could be fed to the specified tray at a higher page per minute rate than normal if the feeder and paper path are enabled for higher speed. Thus, improving productivity by reducing delay time between jobs.
The claims, as originally presented and as they may be amended, encompass variations, alternatives, modifications, improvements, equivalents, and substantial equivalents of the embodiments and teachings disclosed herein, including those that are presently unforeseen or unappreciated, and that, for example, may arise from applicants/patentees and others. Unless specifically recited in a claim, steps or components of claims should not be implied or imported from the specification or any other claims as to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4757348 | Rourke et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5227816 | Forest | Jul 1993 | A |
5488458 | Benedict et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6457651 | Paul et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6985682 | Haines et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7102798 | Haines et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20050249535 | Johnson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/034,197, filed Feb. 20, 2008 and entitled Mulit-Job Feeder Apparatus and Method by Joseph S. Vetromile and Kenneth P. Moore. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090304430 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |