Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The invention relates to solar cell design and more particularly to multi junction solar cells employing dilute nitrides.
The highest solar cell efficiencies are known to be produced by multi junction (MJ) solar cells comprising III-V semiconductor alloys. Their relatively higher efficiencies make these devices attractive for both terrestrial concentrating photovoltaic systems and for celestial systems designed to operate in outer space. Multi junction solar cells have reached efficiencies up to 41.6% under concentrations equivalent to several hundred suns. Currently, the highest efficiency devices have three junctions and are either lattice matched to their substrate or contain metamorphic layers that are not lattice matched. Other factors equal, lattice-matched systems are preferable because they have proven reliability and require less semiconductor material than metamorphic solar cells, which require thick buffer layers to accommodate the differing lattice constants of adjacent materials.
Dilute nitrides are a class of III-V alloy materials (alloys having one or more elements from Group III on the periodic table along with one or more elements from Group V on the periodic table) with small fractions (e.g., <5 atomic percent) of nitrogen. These alloys are of interest for multi junction solar cells because they can be lattice matched to substrates of interest, including GaAs and Ge. Additionally, one can achieve a bandgap of 1 eV for the dilute nitride material, which is ideal for integration into a multi junction solar cell with substantial efficiency improvements.
GaInNAs, GaNAsSb and GaInNAsSb are some of the dilute nitride materials that have been studied as potentially useful for multi-junction solar cells (see, e.g., A. J. Ptak et al., Journal of Applied Physics 98 (2005) 094501 and Yoon et al., Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2009 34th IEEE, pp 76-80, 7-12, June 2009; doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2009.5411736). Furthermore, the use of four junction GaInP/GaAs/dilute-nitride/Ge solar cell structure holds the promise of efficiencies exceeding those of the standard metamorphic and lattice matched three-junction cell, which at present are the benchmark for high-efficiency multi-junction cell performance. (Friedman et al. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 10 (2002), 331). To make that promise a reality, what is needed is a material that is lattice matched to GaAs and Ge with a band gap of near 1 eV and that produces open circuit voltage greater than 0.3 V with sufficient current to match the (Al)InGaP and (In)GaAs sub-cells in a multi-junction solar cell. It should be noted that a multi-junction solar cell for terrestrial use is integrated into a concentrated photovoltaic system. Such a system employs concentrating optics consisting of dish reflectors or Fresnel lenses that concentrate sunlight onto the solar cell. It is possible that a concentrator's optics may attenuate light in a particular wavelength region which may be detrimental to the dilute nitride sub-cell. It is therefore of utmost importance that higher current be generated in the dilute nitride sub-cell so any loss due to the concentrator optics does not inhibit the performance of the multi-junction solar cell.
In a multi-junction solar cell, each of the sub-cells is attached in series to other sub-cells, typically using tunnel junction diodes to connect the individual sub-cells to one another. Since the total current generated by the full stack of sub-cells must pass through all the sub-cells, the sub-cell passing the least amount of current will be the current-limiting cell for the entire stack, and by the same virtue, the efficiency-limiting cell. It is therefore of greatest importance that each sub-cell be current matched to the other sub-cells in the stack for best efficiency. This is particularly important if dilute nitride sub-cells are to be used because dilute nitride semiconductor materials historically have been plagued with poor minority carrier transport properties that prove detrimental when incorporated into a larger solar cell.
Although dilute nitride alloys have other properties that make them desirable for use in multi-junction structures, particularly the flexibility with which their bandgaps and lattice constants can be fine-tuned as part of their design, the minority carrier lifetime and diffusion lengths for these sub-cells are typically worse than with conventional solar cell semiconductors such as GaAs and InGaP used in conventional multi-junction solar cells, thus resulting in a loss of short circuit current, open circuit voltage or both. Moreover, the interface between the back surface field and the base of the dilute nitride sub-cell may have high surface recombination velocity, which could further reduce the short circuit current and open circuit voltage of the sub-cell. As a result of these problems, photocurrents generated in dilute nitride sub-cells are typically lower than with more traditional materials. (D. B. Jackrel et al., Journal of Applied Physics 101 (114916) 2007).
Dopant variation in solar cells is known. See M. A. Green, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 17 (2009). U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,795 is an example of a solar cell design using exponential doping in parts of a solar cell structure, evidently for multi-junction solar cells grown in an inverted metamorphic and lattice mismatched structure. The application to dilute nitride sub-cells is not suggested and is not obvious, due to the anomalous characteristics of dilute nitrides. Dilute nitrides are a novel class of materials, which frequently exhibit different behavior than seen in traditional semiconductor alloys. For example, bandgap bowing as a function of alloy composition is very different in dilute nitrides as compared to traditional semiconductors (e.g., Wu et al., Semicondutor Science and Technology 17, 860 (2002)). Likewise, the standard dopants and doping profiles used for traditional semiconductors such as GaAs and InGaP do not result in comparable characteristics in dilute nitride semiconductors. For example, dopant incorporation in dilute nitrides has anomalous behavior. A Yu et. al. paper reported that when dilute nitride thin films are doped heavily with Si, the Si and N mutually passivate each other's electronic activity (Yu et. al. App. Phys. Lett. 83, 2844 (2003)). Similarly, Janotti et. al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 045505 (2008)) suggested that while the physics of n-type and p-type doping in the parent compounds GaAs and GaN is well established, doping in GaAs1-xNx is much less explored and the interaction between extrinsic dopants and N in GaAs1-xNx alloys can lead to entirely new phenomena. They also pointed that rapid thermal annealing of Si-doped dilute (In)GaAsN alloys at temperatures above 800° C. leads to a drastic increase in the electrical resistivity. Due to the uncertainties associated with doping profiles and outcomes, and due to the unique properties of dilute nitrides, it is not apparent to one of ordinary skill how the concepts taught therein could be incorporated into a solar cell employing dilute nitride elements having portions subjected to controlled doping. Moreover, due to difficulties in doping the dilute nitride alloys, the literature teaches that dilute nitride alloys should not be doped (i.e., should be intrinsic) when incorporated into solar cell structures, for enhancement of the current collection (e.g., Ptak et al. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 094501 (2005); Volz et al. J. Crys. Growth 310, 2222 (2008)). Rather, the literature teaches that the use of doping in the base of the dilute nitride solar cell leads to decreased performance.
Known as well, as previously discussed, dilute nitride cells were thought to have significant drawbacks such that their incorporation into multi-junction solar cells would have led to substantial loss in the efficiency of such a solar cell, thus making dilute nitride cells less attractive commercially than other types of materials. It is desirable to improve current collection in dilute nitride based sub-cells without an accompanying loss of short circuit current, open circuit voltage or both.
According to the invention, a lattice-matched solar cell having a dilute nitride-based sub-cell has a graded doping profile in all or part of the dilute nitride layer, a graded doping profile being defined as a doping profile wherein the concentration of dopant increases or decreases from the top to bottom of the layer, where top and bottom are defined relative to the orientation of the solar cell in operation, the top being closest to the radiation source. Specifically a solar cell with at least one dilute nitride sub-cell that has a base or emitter with graded doping is disclosed. In one embodiment, a lattice matched multi-junction solar cell has an upper sub-cell, a middle sub-cell and a lower dilute nitride sub-cell, the lower dilute nitride sub-cell having graded doping in the base and/or the emitter so as to improve its solar cell performance characteristics. In construction, the dilute nitride sub-cell may have the lowest bandgap and be lattice matched to a substrate; the middle cell typically has a higher bandgap than the dilute nitride sub-cell and is lattice matched to the dilute nitride sub-cell. The upper sub-cell typically has the highest bandgap and is lattice matched to the adjacent sub-cell. In further embodiments, a multi-junction solar cell according to the invention may comprise four, five or more sub-cells in which the one or more sub-cells may each contain dilute nitride alloys with a graded doping profile.
Common to all of these embodiments is a significant functional relationship between overall performance and the vertical distribution of doping in the base and/or emitter of the dilute nitride sub-cells. The doping concentration may be selected so as to have positional dependence, in which dependence varies as a function of vertical position in the base or the emitter. By way of an example, the doping could be designed to increase linearly or exponentially from the top to bottom in the base. Stated in mathematical terms, the doping concentration “d” has a functional dependence such that d=F(x) (i.e., doping is a function of position) where the x is the vertical position in the base and or emitter such that x is zero at the emitter/base junction and increases with distance from this junction. The manner and distribution of the doping (i.e., the function F) is selected to improve and ultimately to optimize the short circuit current and the open circuit voltage that would otherwise exist in the dilute nitride layer. The invention thus provides a lattice matched multi-junction solar cell containing one or more dilute nitride sub-cells and having enhanced efficiency compared to that of a multi-junction solar cell without such distribution of doping.
In one embodiment of the invention, the doping profile is changed in the base of the solar cell such that it is the least at the emitter base junction and increases away from it. The precise distribution function for the increase is chosen to gain maximum current and voltage enhancement for the dilute nitride sub-cell.
In another embodiment, the doping profile is chosen to have two sub-regions in the base, wherein no doping or uniform doping is used for the sub-region closer to the emitter-base junction and graded doping is used in the other sub-region.
The invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings.
According to the invention, a multi-junction solar cell includes at least a dilute nitride solar sub-cell with tailored and more specifically graded doping and/or impurity concentration, as herein described. Without limiting the generality of the invention, a multi-junction solar cell having one or more dilute nitride sub-cells takes advantage of the functional dependence of sub-cell performance on the vertical distribution of doping within the base and/or emitter of the sub-cell. Graded doping indicates a functional dependence on the position in the base and/or emitter.
In other embodiments of the invention, a dilute nitride sub-cell with positional dependence of doping and/or impurity incorporation is integrated as one or more sub-cells of a four-, five- or six-junction solar cell, each sensitive to a different part of the spectrum.
In one embodiment, the dilute nitride sub-cell is a solar cell with its base and/or emitter comprising a dilute nitride material. The cross section for an exemplary dilute nitride sub-cell is shown in
Referring to
An example of such a doping profile is illustrated by the graph of
Doping=A·eBx;
where A=1×1015/cm3 to 2×1017/cm3, B=0.1/μm to 10/μm and x is depth.
Using this range would yield doping between 1×1015/cm3 and 1×1019/cm3 depending on the base thickness. In each case, the dopant flux is minimum at the emitter/base junction. The value of the flux is preset to attain a desired value of the dopant concentration in the epitaxial layer.
Referring to
Doping=A;
where A is a constant and ranges from 0 to 2×1017/cm3,
The remainder of the base has a doping profile that varies as a function of position in a manner similar to that explained for the previously described embodiment and as illustrated by the dotted line in sub-region 4 of this figure. Using this would yield doping between 1×1015/cm3 and 1×1019/cm3 in the base for a thickness of 0 μm to 3 μm of the base.
The thickness of each sub-region can be varied in order to optimize the current and voltage output of the sub-cell. In particular, the optimal thicknesses will be different for different dilute nitride materials, and as the composition of the dilute nitride material changes. An example of such a doping profile is shown in
In the embodiment of the invention discussed above, the variations in doping profile are achieved during epitaxial growth of the semiconductor layers. In addition to the creation of the preferred doping profile during epitaxial growth, the profile may also be manipulated by post growth steps on the semiconductor epilayer. Such post growth steps include but are not limited to annealing the semiconductor material in an atmosphere comprising one or more of the following: As, P, H2, N2, forming gas, and/or O2. Such a process step has multiple variables that must be optimized to achieve a desired doping profile. This includes but is not limited to changing the anneal time, anneal temperature, anneal cycle in addition to anneal environment mentioned above. For example, the anneal temperature may be between 400° C. and 1000° C., while the duration of the annealing process may lie between 10 sec and 1000 sec, and the ambient condition can be a constant pressure atmosphere of primarily phosphorus, arsenic, hydrogen, oxygen and/or nitrogen. The final objective, irrespective of the process step used to achieve it, is a desirable doping profile for a certain composition of the dilute nitride material.
In still another embodiment of this invention, graded doping is introduced in the emitter of the dilute nitride solar cell. In this embodiment, the base may or may not have a graded doping profile according to the embodiments described above. The doping concentration of the emitter (layer 2 in
It should be noted that the embodiments specified above have specific profiles for doping that result in the creation of specific electric fields within the base and/or emitter of a dilute nitride solar cell. These examples are specified for illustration purposes and one skilled in the art can vary the doping profile in many other ways and configurations to achieve particular results. Recitation of these specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention, which is set forth fully in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4404421 | Fraas | Sep 1983 | A |
4881979 | Lewis | Nov 1989 | A |
4935384 | Wanlass | Jun 1990 | A |
5009719 | Yoshida | Apr 1991 | A |
5016562 | Madan et al. | May 1991 | A |
5166761 | Olson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5223043 | Olson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5316593 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5342453 | Olson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5376185 | Wanlass | Dec 1994 | A |
5405453 | Ho et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5689123 | Major et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5800630 | Vilela et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5911839 | Tsai et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5935345 | Kuznicki | Aug 1999 | A |
5944913 | Hou et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6150603 | Karam et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6252287 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281426 | Olson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6340788 | King et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6504091 | Hisamatsu et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6617618 | Sato | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6660928 | Patton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756325 | Bour et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764926 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765238 | Chang et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6787385 | Barber et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6815736 | Mascarenhas | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6951819 | Iles et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7071407 | Faterni et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7119271 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122733 | Narayanan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122734 | Fetzer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123638 | Leary et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126052 | Fetzer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7255746 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279732 | Meng et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7709287 | Fatemi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727795 | Stan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7807921 | Fetzer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7842881 | Comfeld et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8067687 | Wanlass | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8575473 | Jones et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020000546 | Sato | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020195137 | King et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030070707 | King et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030145884 | King et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040045598 | Narayanan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040130002 | Weeks et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040200523 | King et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050155641 | Fafard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050274409 | Fetzer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060144435 | Wanlass | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162768 | Wanlass et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070034853 | Robbins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070131275 | Kinsley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070227588 | Gossard et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080035939 | Puetz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080149173 | Sharps | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245400 | Li | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257405 | Sharps | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090001412 | Nagai et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014061 | Harris et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057721 | Miura et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078310 | Stan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090145476 | Fetzer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155952 | Stan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090229659 | Wanlass et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090255575 | Tischler | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255576 | Tischler | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272438 | Cornfeld | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288703 | Stan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100087028 | Porthouse et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096001 | Sivananthan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100180936 | Kim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100218819 | Farmer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100282305 | Sharps et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282306 | Sharps et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319764 | Wiemer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110023958 | Masson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110114163 | Wiemer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210313 | Fuji et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232730 | Jones et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110303268 | Tan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031478 | Boisvert et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120103403 | Misra et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120211071 | Newman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216858 | Jones-Albertus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216862 | Abou-Kandil et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227797 | Stan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120285526 | Jones-Albertus et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130014815 | Jones et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130118546 | Jones-Albertus et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130118566 | Jones-Albertus et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130220409 | Jones-Albertus et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63100781 | May 1988 | JP |
06061513 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06061516 | Mar 1994 | JP |
10012905 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2010151553 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011062886 | May 2011 | WO |
2011123164 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012057874 | May 2012 | WO |
2012115838 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012154455 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bank, et al., “Molecular-beam epitaxy growth of low-threshold cw GainNAsSb lasers at 1.5 μm,” pp. 1337-1340, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23(3), May/Jun. 2005. |
Bertness et al., “29.5%-Efficient GaInP/GaAs Tandem Solar Cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 65, Aug. 22, 1994, pp. 989-991. |
Cotal et al., “III-V multijunction solar cells for concentrating photovoltaics” pp. 174-192, www.rsc.org/ees, Energy and Environmental Science 2, (2009). |
Ferguson et al., Nonradiative Recombination in 1.56 μm GaInNAsSb/GaNAs Quantum-Well Lasers, pp. 1-3, published online Dec. 8, 2009, Applied Physics Letters 95, 231104 (2009). |
Fewster P.F., “X-Ray Scattering From Semiconductors” Second Edition, Imperial College Press, London, 2003, Ch. 1, pp. 1-22. |
Friedman et al., “Analysis of the GaInP/GaAs/1-eV/Ge Cell and Related Structures for Terrestrial Concentration Application,” pp. 856-859, Conference Record of the Twenty-ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, New Orleans, LA., May 19-24, 2002. |
Friedman et al., “Analysis of Depletion-Region Collection in GaInNAs Solar Cells,” pp. 691-694, Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, Jan. 3-7, 2005. |
Geisz et al., “Inverted GaInP / (In)GaAs / InGaAs triple-junction solar cells with low-stress metamorphic bottom junctions,” Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE PVSC Photovoltaics Specialists Conference, (2008). |
Green et al., Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 19 (2011) pp. 565-572. |
Green et al., Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 20 (2012) pp. 12-20. |
Green, “Third Generation Photovoltaics: Advanced Solar Energy Conversion,” pp. 95-109, Springer Publishing, Berlin, Germany (2003). |
Gu et al., “Gas Source Growth and Doping Characteristics of A1InP on GaAs” Materials Science and Engineering B 131 (2006), pp. 49-53. |
Harris Jr. et al., “Development of GainNAsSballoys: Growth, band structure, optical properties and applications,” 2007, Physics Status Solidi(b), vol. 244, Issue 8, pp. 2707-2729, Jul. 6, 2007. |
Hovel H.J., “Semiconductors and Semimetals”, Academic Press, New York, 1975, Ch. 2, pp. 8-47. |
Jackrel et al., “GaInNAsSb Solar Cells Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy,” pp. 1-16, IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Waikoloa, HI, 2006. |
Jackrel et al., “GaInNAsSb Solar Cells Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy,” 2006. Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference, vol. 1, p. 783-786, May 2006. |
King et al., “High-Voltage, Low-Current GaInP/GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs/Ge Solar Cells” Spectrolab Inc., 2002, pp. 852-855. |
King et al., “40% Efficient Metamorphic GaInP/GaInAs/Ge Multijunction Solar Cells,” J. of Applied Physics Letters, May 4, 2007, 3 pages. |
Kudrawiec, “Contactless electroreflectance of GaInNAsSb/GaAs single quantum wells with indium content of 8%-32%”, Jan. 2007, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, pp. 013504-1-013504-9. |
Kurtz et al., “Projected Performance of Three and Four-Junction Devices Using GaAs and GaInP,” pp. 875-878, 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference, (1997). |
Merrill et al., Directions and Materials Challenges in High Performance Photovoltaics, Dec. 2007, JOM Energetic Thin Films, 59, 12, 26-30. |
Miyashita et al., Effect of Indium Composition on GaInNAsSb Solar Cells Grown by Atomic Hydrogen-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy, pp. 000632-000635, 978-1-4244-2950@ 2009 IEEE. |
Miyashita et al., “Improvement of GaInNAsSb films fabricated by atomic hydrogen-assisted molecular beam epitaxy”, pp. 3249-3251, Journal of Crystal Growth 311, 2009. |
Olson J.M. et al., “High-Efficiency III-V Multijunction Solar Cells” Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 1st ed.; Luque, A., Hegedus, S., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Chapter 9, pp. 359-411. |
Ptak et al., “Effects of Temperature, Nitrogen Ions and Antimony on Wide Depletion Width GaInNAs,” pp. 955-959.J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B25(3), May/Jun. 2007 (published May 31, 2007). |
Ptak et al., “Defects in GaInNAs: What We've Learned so Far” National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/CP-520-33555, May 2003, 7 pages. |
Sabnis et al., A new roadmap for space solar cells, Industry Photovoltaics, www.compoundsemiconductor.net/csc/features-details/19735471, Aug./Sep. 2012, 5 pages. |
Solar Junction Inc, “Sharp Develops Solar Cell with Word's Highest Conversion Efficiency of 35.8%” Press Release, dated Oct. 22, 2009, 3 pages. |
Volz et al., MOVPE growth of dilute nitride III/V semiconductors using all liquid metalorganic precursors, Journal of Crystal Growth 311 (2009), pp. 2418-2526. |
Wiemer et al., “43.5% Efficient Lattice Matched Solar Cells” Proc. SPIE 810804 (2011), 5 pages. |
Wistey et al., Nitrogen Plasma Optimization for High-Quality Dilute Nitrides, pp. 229-233, Journal of Crystal Growth, available online on Feb. 1, 2005 at http://www.sciencedirect.com. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion PCT/US2008/008495 mailed Apr. 6, 2009, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability PCT/US2008/008495 dated Jan. 12, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to the PCT application No. PCT/US10/39534, date of mailing Sep. 8, 2010, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to the PCT application No. PCT/US2010/061635, date of mailing Mar. 1, 2011, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/056800, mailed on May 31, 2012, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US12/36020, mailed on Aug. 14, 2012, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US12/25307, mailed on Aug. 16, 2012, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Jun. 10, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,818, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action of Jan. 1, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/217,818, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Oct. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/944,439, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action of Oct. 24, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/749,076, 17 pages. |
Friedman et al., Breakeven Criteria for the GaInNAs Junction in GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs/Ge Four-junction Solar Cells, pp. 331-344, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. (2002). |
Garcia et al., Analysis of Tellurium as N-Type Dopant in GaInP: Doping, Diffusion, Memory Effect and Surfactant Properties, pp. 794-799, Journal of Crystal Growth 298 (2007), www.sciencedirect.com Available online Dec. 4, 2006. |
Geelen et al., Epitaxial Lift-Off GaAs Solar Cell From a Reusable GaAs Substrate, pp. 162-171, Materials Science and Engineering B45 (1997). |
Green, Do Built-in Fields Improve Solar Cell Performance? pp. 57-66, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (2009), Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) on Oct. 1, 2008. |
Jackrel et al., Dilute nitride GainNAs and GainNAsSb solar cells by molecular beam epitaxy, pp. 1-8, Journal of Applied Physics 101, 114916, (2007). |
Janotti et. al., Mutual Passivation of Electrically Active and Isovalent Impurities in Dilute Nitrides, Physical Review Letters 100, 045505 (2008). |
Ng et al., 1EV GANxAS1-x-γSBγ Material for Lattice-Matched III-V Solar Cell Implementation on GAAS and GE, pp. 76-80, (2009). |
Ptak et al., Low-acceptor-Concentration GInNAs grown by Molecular-beam Epitaxy for High-current p-i-n solar cell applications, Journal of Applied Physics 98, 094501 (2005). |
Volz et al., Optimization of Annealing Conditions of (GaIn)(NAs) for Solar Cell Applications, pp. 2222-2228, Journal of Crystal Growth 310 (2008) www.sciencedirect.com Available online Dec. 4, 2007. |
Wu et al., Band Anticrossing in Highly Mismatched III-V Semiconductor Alloys, pp. 860-869, Semiconductor Science and Technology 17 (2002). |
Yu et. al., Mutual Passivation of Group IV Donors and Nitrogen in Diluted GaNxAs1-xAlloys, pp. 2844-2846, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, No. 14 (Oct. 6, 2003). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to the PCT application No. PCT/US10/56800, date of mailing Jan. 26, 2011, 8 pages total. |
Yamaguchi et al., “Multi-junction III-V solar cells: current status and future potential”, in: Solar Energy, vol. 79, issue 1, Jul. 2005, Abstract [online]. [Retrieved on Jan. 12, 2011 from the Internet] at URL: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?—ob=ArticleURL&—udi=B6V50-4DNW4BV-3&—user=10&—coverDate=07%2F31%2F2005&—rdoc=1&—fmt=high&—orig=search&—origin=search&—sort=d&—docanchor=&view=c&—search Strld=1605061367&—rerunOrigin=scholar.google&—acct=C000050221&—version=1&—urlVersion=0&—userid=10&md5=d794dede36e6c73a9dc0c9b7e27d43a2&searchtype=a>. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to the PCT application No. PCT/US11/36486, date of mailing Aug. 25, 2011, 12 pages total. |
Cornfeld et al., “Evolution of a 2.05 eV AlGaInP top Sub-cell for 5 and 6J-IMM Applications”, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 38th IEEE, Jun. 3, 2012, p. 2788-2791. |
Patton et al., “Development of a High Efficiency Metamorphic Triple-junction 2.1 eV/1.6 eV/1.2 eV AlGaInP/InGaAsP/InGaAs Space Solar Cell”, Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., May 19, 2002, vol. 29, p. 1027-1030. |
Denton et al., Vegard's Law, Physical Review, A, The American Physical Society, vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 3161-3164 (1991). |
Law et al., “Future technology pathways of terrestrial III-V multijunction solar cells for concentrator photovoltaic systems,” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 94 (2010) pp. 1314-1318. |
Friedman et al., “1-eV Solar cells with GaInNAs active layer”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 195, 1998, p. 409-415. |
Kurtz et al., “Understanding the potential and limitations of dilute nitride alloys for solar cells”, Paper No. NREL/CP-520-38998, DOE Solar Energy Technologies Conference, Denver, CO, Nov. 7-10, 2005, 5 pages. |
E. Wesoff, “Update: Solar Junction breaking CPV efficiency records, raising $30M”, Greentech Media, Apr. 15, 2011, 4 pages. |
E. Wesoff, “CPV Roundup: SolFocus funding, 5MW order for Solar Junction, GreenVolts, Amonix”, Greentech Media, May 22, 2012, 3 pages. |
E. Wesoff, “Record 44 percent CPV efficiency from startup Solar Junction”, Greentech Media, Oct. 15, 2012, 3 pages. |
Weyers et al., “Red shift of photoluminescence and absorption in dilute GaAsN alloy layers”, Japan Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 31, Issue 7A, 1992, p. L853-L855. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/033567, mailed on Mar. 4, 2014, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,913, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,496, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,496, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/819,534, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,496, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/708,763, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,791, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,989, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action of May 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/944,439, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/819,534, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action of May 29, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/944,439, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,913, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,791, 15 pages. |
Amendment, Affidavits under 37 C.F.R. §132, and Information Disclosure Statement filed Nov. 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,989, 51 pages. |
Final Office Action maield Feb. 26, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,989, 16 pages. |
Non-Fnial Office Action mailed on Dec. 31, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,500, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 21, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,913, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/678,389, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 20, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,763, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 21, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/442,146, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/819,534, Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 9, 2013, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/944,439, Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 13, 2014, 11 pages. |
Japanese Application No. 2012-517662, Office Action mailed on Apr. 30, 2013, 5 pages (English translation). |
Japanese Application No. 2013-502560, Office Action mailed on May 7, 2014, 5 pages (English translation). |
Japanese Application No. 2013-536607, Office Action mailed on Mar. 18, 2014, 6 pages (English translation). |
Bhuiyan et al., InGaN Solar Cells: Present State of the Art and Important Challenges, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 2012, pp. 246-293. |
Miller et al., GaAs—AlGaAs tunnel junctions for multigap cascade solar cells, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 53, No. 1, Jan. 1982, pp. 744-748. |
Yuen, “The role of antimony on properties of widely varying GaInNAsSb compositions”, Journal of Applied Physics, May 2006, vol. 99, p. 093504-1 to 093804-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120103403 A1 | May 2012 | US |