This disclosure is generally directed to medical tubing and, more specifically, to multi-layered tubing having odor barrier properties suitable for use as catheter tubing for fecal drainage systems, and a combination odor barrier tube and odor barrier collection bag.
Catheter tubes for fecal drainage systems are designed to facilitate flow of fecal matter, with the fecal matter typically draining into a collection bag. A catheter tube can include a lubricious coating on an interior to facilitate movement of fecal matter. While various materials have been used to form the walls of a catheter tube, no catheter tubes for fecal drainage systems are known that include integral odor barrier properties. One reason for the lack of catheter tubes having odor barrier properties is that odor barrier materials are understood to be too stiff and not suitable for catheter tubing applications. By providing a multi-layer catheter tube with at least one odor barrier layer, the catheter tube can reduce or eliminate exposure of the patient, caregivers, and other persons in the vicinity of the patient to unpleasant odors.
Fecal drainage systems are frequently employed in combination with enema, lavage, or other irrigation techniques to loosen stool in the rectum of a patient. As a result, water or other liquid is likely to travel through the catheter tube with fecal matter.
In preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, the catheter tubing for a fecal drainage system is made of at least two layers of different materials. The layers are preferably co-extruded, or one layer may be extruded and one or more subsequent layers may subsequently be applied by extrusion over the first layer, but alternately, the layers may be formed as a generally flat laminate sheet that is rolled into a tubular shape, then sealed along a seam, for example using sealing technology, such as heat sealing or RF sealing, using adhesive sealing, or ultrasonic welding. In order to increase durability, at least one of the layers of the flat laminate sheet that is then rolled into a cylinder can be a semi-rigid mesh or scrim material.
Another desirable feature of a catheter tube for a fecal drainage system is minimal wall thickness. The multi-layer odor barrier catheter tube of the present disclosure can be manufactured with a total wall thickness in the range of about 10 mil to about 60 mil.
The odor barrier layer may be a resin, preferably a polyamide, and most preferably nylon 666. The odor barrier layer may include an additive in the form of a modifier for reduced modulus, preferably ethylene-ethylacrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer (commercially available as Lotader® 4720, from Arkema, Inc. of Philadelphia, Pa.). The odor barrier layer is preferably the outermost layer, or outer skin, of the catheter tube.
The odor barrier layer of the catheter tube preferably has a thickness of 3 mil or less, and the thickness of the odor barrier is preferably less than 30% of the total tube wall thickness. The odor barrier layer preferably has a kinetic coefficient of friction less than 0.5.
A second layer of the catheter tube may be a resin or resin blend, preferably having a modulus of elasticity less than 100,000 psi (2% secant) when measured according to ASTM D882.
A third layer forming the innermost layer or inner skin of the catheter tube may also be employed. The third or innermost layer preferably has a low kinetic coefficient of friction, preferably less than 0.5. The low kinetic coefficient of friction may be an inherent property of a dry material of which the third layer is formed. Lubricity is a beneficial feature of the innermost layer of the catheter tube to promote or facilitate flow of fecal matter through the catheter tube. In order to achieve the desired lubricity of the innermost surface of the catheter tube, the inner layer of the multi-layer odor barrier tube of the present disclosure may be made of a copolymer of ethylene, preferably an ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) with an added slip agent concentrate, such as 10090 Slip PE MB, having a concentration of 5% Erucamide, available from Ampacet of Tarrytown, N.Y., to lower the coefficient of friction. Preferably, the slip agent concentrate is only about 2% of the overall composition of the innermost layer of the catheter tube, so the effective concentration of the Erucamide is about 0.1%.
In light of the likely presence of water or other liquid traveling through the catheter tube with the fecal matter, as an alternative to an EVA copolymer, a hydrophilic polymer that becomes lubricious in contact with water, preferably polyethyleneoxide or polyvinylalcohol, may be used as the inner layer of the multi-layer odor barrier catheter tube.
If the collection bag into which the catheter tube drains lacks odor barrier properties, unpleasant odors can escape the collection bag, thereby negating the odor barrier benefits achieved by the odor barrier catheter tube. It is therefore desirable for the odor barrier tube to drain into a collection bag that itself has odor barrier walls.
With reference to the drawings, in a first embodiment of a multi-layer odor barrier catheter tube 10 of the present disclosure connectable at a first end to a patient-proximal internal section, and/or a trans-anal section of a rectal catheter (not shown), and at a second end, connectable to a waste collection bag or to a disposal receptacle (e.g., a bedpan or toilet (not shown)) is provided. At least one of the layers of the multi-layer catheter tube 10 is constructed of materials resistant to transmission of fecal and flatus gasses.
A first layer 12 of the catheter tube 10 defines the external surface 14 of the catheter tube 10. The first layer 12 is preferably comprised of one or more materials that possess a relatively low coefficient of friction, most preferably less than 0.5, so as to reduce drag of the catheter tube 10 against a patient's skin, and against items surrounding the patient, including a hospital gown, bed sheets, chair or other objects in the patient's immediate vicinity. The low coefficient of friction of the external surface 14 of the catheter tube 10 also facilitates “milking” the fecal matter down the length of the catheter tube 10. The material or materials defining the first layer 12 of the catheter tube 10 include an odor barrier resin. In other embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure, the odor barrier resin may be employed as a layer of the catheter tube 10 other than the first layer 12 defining the outside surface 14.
A suitable material for the first layer 12 of the catheter tube 10 of the present disclosure is a polyamide, most preferably nylon 666. A modifier may be added to achieve a reduced modulus, preferably ethylene-ethylacrylate-maleic anhydride terpolymer, commercially available as Lotader® 4720 from Arkema, Inc. The external surface 14 of the first layer 12 is preferably a surface that will receive inks such as permanent or semi-permanent markers, and retain such markings thereon without smudging or wiping off, to facilitate receiving instructions, patient data, collection bag change data, dates of indwell or intended removal of the catheter tube, and the like.
An intermediate layer 16 of the multi-layer catheter tube 10 preferably comprises a resin or resin blend having a modulus of elasticity less than 100,000 psi (2% secant) when measured according to ASTM D882. The resin used as the material forming the intermediate layer 16 is preferably a thermoplastic elastomer, most preferably polyurethane or a polyurethane blended with another thermoplastic elastomer, having a preferred modulus less than 40,000 psi (2% secant). As described in more detail below, more than one layer of material may be provided intermediate the first layer 12 defining the external surface 14 of the catheter tube 10 and a third layer 18 defining an internal surface 20 of the catheter tube 10. If only a first layer 12 and a low modulus layer are provided, the layer referenced herein as the intermediate layer 16 may instead be the inner-most layer of the catheter tube 10, as shown in
Depending on the compatibility of the materials of adjacent layers of the multi-layered catheter tube 10, as shown in
Another layer 18 of the multi-layer catheter tube 10, defining the internal surface 20 of the catheter tube 10, is preferably made of one or more materials that possess a relatively low coefficient of friction, preferably less than 0.5, to allow stool and bowel discharge to flow easily along the internal length of the catheter tube 10 for collection and/or disposal. A suitable material for the layer 18 is a copolymer of ethylene, most preferably an ethylene-vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) with an added slip agent (such as 10090 Slip PE MB, having a concentration of 5% Erucamide, available from Ampacet of Tarrytown, N.Y.), wax, PTFE, or other friction-reducing additive to achieve a low coefficient of friction. Such additives may also be used to lower the coefficient of friction of the first layer 12 defining the external surface 14 of the catheter tube 10. As an alternate to the material or materials defining the layer 18 of the catheter tube 10 inherently possessing a low coefficient of friction, a hydrophilic polymer that becomes lubricious in contact with water, preferably polyethyleneoxide or polyvinylalcohol, may be used as the innermost layer of the multi-layer odor barrier catheter tube 10. This may be accomplished by the layer 18 having a capability of anchoring hydrophilic materials thereto, and then supplying an additional hydrophilic layer, such as by co-extrusion, internally of the layer 18. As a further alternate, the layer 18 may itself be formed entirely of a hydrophilic polymer, and anchored directly to intermediate layer 16, provided that there is adequate adhesion between the hydrophilic layer 18 and the intermediate layer 16.
The multi-layer catheter tube 10 of the first embodiment of the present disclosure may be manufactured by co-extrusion. In order to maximize tube softness and flexibility, it is desirable for the odor barrier layer of the catheter tube 10 to be thin, preferably in a range of less than about 2 to about 3 mils.
As an alternative to co-extrusion, as shown in
The total cumulative wall thickness of the multi-layer catheter tube 10 is preferably in the range of about 10 mil to about 40 mil, and more preferably in a range of about 25 mil to about 35 mil, with the thickness of the odor barrier layer (e.g., the first layer 12) making up less than about 30% of the total wall thickness of the catheter tube 10.
Adjustments may be made to process conditions under which the layers of the multi-layer catheter tube of the present disclosure are co-extruded or heat laminated to reduce the coefficient of friction of one or more of the layers.
In another embodiment, shown in
The material(s) forming the internal and/or external surfaces of the multi-layer catheter tube of the present disclosure preferably facilitate attachment and assembly of the catheter tube to peripheral components of fecal drainage and management systems, such as the Bowel Management System available from Hollister Incorporated of Libertyville, Ill., the assignee of the present disclosure. As such systems are intended for long-duration use, on the order of about twenty-nine days, it is advantageous to employ materials that will easily form a reliable bond, by adhesive and/or heat, between the catheter tube and the peripheral components, such as internal or external silicone balloons, catheter connections, such as to a collection bag or to a catheter tube extension, or plastic or metal ports, such as ports for providing endoscope access or for sampling fecal matter directly from the catheter tube, for the entire duration of use of the catheter.
As noted above, the advantages achieved by the odor barrier properties of the catheter tubes of the present disclosure would be negated, or significantly diminished, if fecal or flatus gasses could be transmitted through one or more walls of a collection bag 44 (see
The odor barrier collection bag may be a drainable collection bag 44, having a drainage tube 46 with a drainage tube stopper 48 and a cap 50 for capping a catheter tube connection port 52, as shown in
While certain embodiments of multi-layer odor barrier catheter tubes, combinations of multi-layer odor barrier catheter tubes and odor barrier collection bags, and methods of manufacturing multi-layer odor barrier catheter tubes are disclosed herein, the appended claims are not intended to be limited thereto. Variations can be made to the disclosed embodiments that are still within the scope of the appended claims, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/976,214, filed Sep. 28, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2800145 | Peierls et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
3561493 | Maillard | Feb 1971 | A |
4312693 | Salensky et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4376799 | Tusim | Mar 1983 | A |
4445898 | Jensen | May 1984 | A |
4627844 | Schmitt | Dec 1986 | A |
4650817 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4687711 | Vietto et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4721508 | Burton | Jan 1988 | A |
4778553 | Wood et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4906495 | Martini et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5084315 | Karimi et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5171305 | Schickling et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5261898 | Polin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277753 | Kelley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5290613 | Shuetz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5356400 | Temple | Oct 1994 | A |
5356709 | Woo et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364662 | Domenico et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5386817 | Jones | Feb 1995 | A |
5407713 | Wilfong et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5439454 | Lo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439545 | Nakanishi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5466424 | Kusano et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468526 | Allen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470624 | Oreglia et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480377 | Cartmell et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488975 | Chiles et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496295 | Wilfong et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5529820 | Nomi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5567488 | Allen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567489 | Allen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569216 | Kim | Oct 1996 | A |
5643375 | Wilfong et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681627 | Mueller | Oct 1997 | A |
5686173 | Fujii et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5730919 | Wilfong et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738923 | Ko et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759173 | Preissman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5908656 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928744 | Heilmann et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932307 | Ryan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983604 | Wilfong et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986003 | Lee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6050982 | Wheeler | Apr 2000 | A |
6057414 | Razavi | May 2000 | A |
6136394 | Karsten | Oct 2000 | A |
6143383 | Giori | Nov 2000 | A |
6165166 | Samuelson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6217547 | Lee | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258423 | Giori | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286555 | Pauker et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299596 | Ding | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6406767 | Mueller | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6431219 | Redler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447835 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455161 | Regnier et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6620474 | Regnier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6663614 | Carter | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6770342 | Buongiorno | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776195 | Blasko et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6869653 | Ling et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6945970 | Pepin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964816 | Schell et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977105 | Fujieda et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7015284 | Ajbani et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7090664 | Holter | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100767 | Chomik et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112298 | Kampa et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7147627 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7270860 | Giori | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7361170 | Williams et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7396582 | Claude et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7481804 | Devens, Jr. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7550185 | Ling et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7628784 | Diaz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647949 | Donohue et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7722583 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8323254 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8399077 | Bekele | Mar 2013 | B1 |
20020016607 | Bonadio et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030064182 | Giori | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030131569 | Chomik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030218022 | Chomik et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040134555 | Powell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175525 | Willard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228992 | Giori | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050038374 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054996 | Gregory | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075616 | Holter | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050182387 | Webler | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050273064 | Dircks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060147698 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060249418 | Chomik et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253102 | Nance et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070043333 | Kampa et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051418 | Rowles et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080032110 | Wood et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080103463 | Tsai et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080262447 | Martino et al. | Oct 2008 | A2 |
20090048537 | Lydon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088711 | Shelley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090169788 | Pandey et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090202759 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240235 | Murata | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100055357 | Ciccarello | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055367 | Ohigawa | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063477 | Ohigawa | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100174252 | Tanghoej et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100274201 | Feeley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 366 802 | May 1990 | EP |
0 469 926 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 575 798 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 615 832 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0 913 165 | May 1999 | EP |
1 514 572 | Mar 2005 | EP |
54-074514 | Jun 1979 | JP |
3-041176 | Feb 1991 | JP |
3-050262 | Mar 1991 | JP |
4-100857 | Apr 1992 | JP |
2001-227682 | Aug 2001 | JP |
WO-9923158 | May 1999 | WO |
WO-0183017 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2008052018 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EXACT plastomers, http://www.exxonmobilchemical.com/, printed Sep. 18, 2013. |
Polyolefin Elastomers, http://www.iisrp.com/WebPolymers/05ModPolyolefineElast—v1-2.pdf, Mar. 11, 2006. |
PolyOne GLS Thermoplastic Elastomers Frequently Asked TPE Questions, http://www.glstpes.com/resources—faqs.php, printed Sep. 18, 2013. |
International Search Report of PCT/US2008/077796, mailed Dec. 23, 2008 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion of PCT/US2008/077796, mailed Dec. 23, 2008 (8 pages). |
Lai et al., “Surface Modification of Silicone Rubber by Gas Plasma Treatment,” J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 10(3):231-242 (1996). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090088711 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60976214 | Sep 2007 | US |