The present disclosure relates to analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and, more particularly, to a way of reducing 1/f noise and direct current (DC) offset from a voltage reference source associated with the analog-to-digital converter.
Analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) are in widespread use today in electronic applications for consumer, medical, industrial, etc. Typically, ADCs include circuitry for receiving an analog input signal and outputting a digital value proportional to the analog input signal. This digital output value is typically in the form of either a parallel word or a serial digital bit string. There are many types of analog-to-digital conversion schemes such as voltage-to-frequency conversion, charge redistribution, delta modulation, as well as others. Typically, each of these conversion schemes has its advantages and disadvantages.
One type of analog-to-digital converter (ADC) that has seen increasing use is the switched capacitor sigma-delta ADC (sigma-delta and delta-sigma will be used interchangeably herein). The sigma-delta ADC utilizes delta-sigma modulation where an analog voltage is input to the delta-sigma modulator and the output thereof is filtered to remove noise. A delta-sigma modulator typically converts an analog input to a digital serial string of “ones” and “zeros” having an average amplitude over time proportional to the analog input. Delta-sigma modulation generally provides for high accuracy and wide dynamic range as compared to earlier delta modulation techniques. Delta-sigma modulation is often referred to as an oversampled converter architecture and is typically immune from some of the earlier undesirable second order effects of delta modulation.
The switched capacitor sigma-delta converter uses a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) in a feedback loop that applies a voltage(s) to an analog summing node located at the front end (analog portion) of the delta-sigma modulator. With any ADC there are a number of noise sources that are inherent in the ADC design. In a typical delta-sigma ADC, there are typically three types of noise: the quantization noise coming from the error introduced by the quantizer in the feedback loop, the thermal noise coming from the devices of the converter itself and the 1/f noise coming also from the devices. In addition, since the output code of the ADC is proportional to the ratio of the input voltage and the reference voltage, any additional noise coming from the reference voltage will be present at the output especially when the ratio of the input voltage over reference voltage is close to 1. Moreover, a deterministic error in the voltage reference coming from a DC offset will impact the ADC as a gain error.
The quantization noise at low frequencies is relatively low with the largest portion thereof existing at higher frequencies. This higher frequency portion noise can be filtered out by a digital domain filter, e.g., decimation and/or digital low-pass filter. Moreover, the quantization noise can be lowered by increasing either the order of the modulator or the resolution of the DAC. The thermal noise coming from both the reference voltage and the ADC can be averaged by increasing the oversampling ratio of the converter. However, averaging techniques do not filter DC offset and 1/f noise, especially when they come from the voltage reference, as they are typically passed through the converter with the signal information. For high-resolution ADCs, 1/f noise becomes the dominant one when both quantization and thermal noise have been reduced. It is very difficult to attenuate since it is not affected by increasing complexity of the ADC (higher order, multi-bit DAC) or the oversampling.
DC offset from the voltage reference may be substantially reduced by using a chopper stabilized voltage reference. A typical chopper stabilized bandgap voltage reference is more fully described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,462,612, entitled “Chopper Stabilized Bandgap Reference Circuit to Cancel Offset Variation” by Roh et al., and is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes. The chopper stabilized voltage reference substantially reduces direct current (DC) offset voltage error in the voltage reference. However, the typical chopper stabilized voltage reference requires an analog low-pass filter at the output of the reference to remove the components of the high-frequency modulation introduced by the chopper stabilization. Such a low pass filter isn't required when the chopped Bandgap voltage is directly applied to the reference input of a sigma-delta converter: the HF chopping noise can be filtered out by the decimation and/or digital low-pass filter. However, a modified chopper sequence is required when the decimation and/or digital low-pass filter is used for filtering out HF chopping noise.
A sigma-delta analog-to-digital converter (ADC) may use a multibit DAC in the modulator loop. This has advantages in terms of resolution, signal to noise ratio and brings improvements regarding stability at a reduced cost in terms of design complexity and power consumption. However, linearity is often degraded by a multi-bit DAC that is not inherently linear and often requires very accurate calibration and/or trimming.
On the other hand, the voltage references used by the ADC often contribute significantly to the noise figure of the system, especially on low bandwidth systems because of the 1/f noise that is not removed with oversampling technique. Moreover, the offset of the amplifier in the voltage reference circuit contributes to gain error of the ADC and often requires trimming or calibration.
What is needed is a multi-level, e.g., five-level, digital-to-analog converter (DAC) that provides inherent linearity and voltage reference offset cancellation, and 1/f noise reduction.
According to an embodiment, a multi-bit digital-to-analog converter may comprise a chopped reference voltage generator generating a reference voltage that comprises a chopped offset voltage; a switched capacitor stage for generating a plurality of output voltages; and a switching sequencer controlling the switched capacitor stage operable to generate switching patterns for each output voltages, wherein each pattern comprising a charge phase and a transfer phase, and wherein for at least one output voltage the switching sequencer provides two switching patterns wherein each switching pattern contributes an offset of opposite polarity.
According to a further embodiment, the switching sequencer may comprise memory means to store the sign of a generated offset and the switching sequencer selects a pattern depending on an input value and said stored sign. According to a further embodiment, the reference voltage generator can be chopped with each charge and transfer phase and the two switching patterns can be applied alternately to the switched capacitor stage. According to a further embodiment, the reference voltage generator can be chopped only between a charge and a transfer phase and either the first or second switching patterns is applied to the switched capacitor stage. According to a further embodiment, the switched capacitor stage may comprise two partial switching stages in parallel and the two switching patterns are applied to the first and second partial switching stages, respectively. According to a further embodiment, the two switching patterns can be applied alternately to the first and second partial switching stages. According to a further embodiment, the switched capacitor stage may comprise a plus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C; a minus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C; a first pair of switches adapted for switchably coupling the plus and minus reference voltage capacitors to plus and minus reference voltages, respectively; a second pair of switches adapted for switchably coupling the plus and minus reference voltage capacitors to the minus and the plus reference voltages, respectively; and a third switch adapted for switchably coupling the plus and minus reference voltage capacitors together. According to a further embodiment, the multi-bit digital-to-analog converter may be a 5-level (3-bit) digital-to-analog converter and wherein the first pair of switches, the second pair of switches, and the third switch are sequenced in a charge phase and a transfer phase to produce five equally distributed charge levels of 2C*V
According to another embodiment, a method for producing at least one output voltage of a plurality of output voltages in a switched capacitor digital-to-analog converter, may comprise the steps of: receiving an input signal for the at least one output voltage; providing a reference voltage using chopper control, thereby generating a positive or negative offset to said reference voltage, generating said at least one output voltage with a first switching pattern A having a first and second phase, thereby generating a positive offset; and generating said at least one output voltage with a second switching pattern B different from said first switching pattern for said first and second phase, thereby generating a negative offset.
According to a further embodiment, the method may further comprise the steps of storing the sign of a generated offset, and selecting a pattern depending on the input signal and said stored sign. According to a further embodiment, the chopper control may chop the reference voltage for each first and second phase. According to a further embodiment, the chopper control may chop the reference voltage only between said first and second phase and only pattern A or pattern B is used. According to a further embodiment, the first pattern and second pattern can be used alternately in for a sequence of the input signals with a control sequence of “ABABAB . . . ” or “BABABA . . . ”. According to a further embodiment, the first pattern and second pattern can be used alternately in for a sequence of the input signals including a control sequence of “AABBAABB . . . ” or “BBAABBAA . . . ”. According to a further embodiment, five reference voltage levels can be generated in a feed-back digital-to-analog converter, the method comprising the steps of: providing a plus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C; providing a minus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C; producing a charge level of C*V
According to yet another embodiment, a method for producing at least one output voltage of a plurality of output voltages in a switched capacitor digital-to-analog converter, may comprise the steps of: receiving an input signal for the at least one output voltage; providing a reference voltage using chopper control, thereby generating a positive or negative offset to said reference voltage, generating a first partial charge with a first switching pattern A using a first and second phase, thereby generating a positive offset; and in parallel generating a second partial charge with a second switching pattern B different from the first switching pattern using the first and second phase, thereby generating a negative offset; adding the first and second partial charges to form the output voltage.
According to a further embodiment, the method may further comprise the steps of storing the sign of a resulting offset, and selecting first and second patterns depending on the input signal and said stored sign. According to a further embodiment, the switching pattern for the first partial charge and the second partial charge can be alternated for a sequence of the input signals, wherein an alternating control sequence comprises the patterns “ABABAB . . . ” or “BABABA . . . ”. According to a further embodiment, the switching pattern for the first partial charge and the second partial charge can be alternated for a sequence of the input signals, wherein an alternating control sequence comprises the patterns “AABBAABB . . . ” or “BBAABBAA . . . ”. According to a further embodiment, five reference voltage levels can be generated in a feed-back digital-to-analog converter, the method comprising the steps of: providing a first plus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C/2; providing a first minus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C/2; providing a second plus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C/2; providing a second minus reference voltage capacitor having a capacitance of C/2; producing a charge level of C*V
a-e show different patterns generating output voltages of the five level digital-to-analog converter shown in
a-b show patterns for input values generating +Vref*C;
a-b show patterns for input values generating −Vref*C;
According to the teachings of this disclosure, combining an inherently linear multi-level, e.g., five-level, switched capacitor multi-bit DAC and a chopper stabilized voltage reference allows improvement of both signal to noise ratio and resolution, as well as 1/f noise cancellation, and gain error reduction with no calibration required. This new novel and non-obvious combination uses switching techniques that do not require any modification of the voltage reference technique to perform the chopper algorithm or any bitstream modulation. The same voltage reference can then be reused on other ADCs connected in parallel for multi-channel systems for better matching between channels.
A five-level feed-back DAC for a switched capacitor Sigma-Delta ADC is more fully described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,102,558 B2; entitled “Five-Level Feed-Back Digital-to-Analog Converter for a Switched Capacitor Sigma-Delta Analog-to-Digital Converter” by Philippe Deval, and is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
Referring to
The five equally distributed charge levels in this five level embodiment may be 2C*Vref, C*Vref, 0, −C*Vref and −2C*Vref. Other embodiments may have more or less levels and may use different values for the reference voltage. As mentioned above, each voltage is generated by a switching pattern which, for example, can be generated by a switching control unit 160. Switching control unit 160 receives the DAC digital input word or the multi-level input information which is used to decode or determine which pattern is applied to the switches.
The reference voltage (V
V
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Three more charge levels are added to the basic operation of the aforementioned two-level feed-back DAC in order to achieve a five-level DAC. These three additional charge levels are C*V
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The conventional different switching sequences as shown in
What is taught in this disclosure is usable for all multi-bit DACs, for example in all multi-bit Sigma-Delta ADC but is not limited to ADC. This improvement in resolution permits very low power consumption while achieving higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lower 1/f noise then current technology while keeping very good linearity performance. The added circuitry and power consumption is negligible, the chopper voltage reference does not need to be modified, thus enabling multi-channel systems to share the same voltage reference. The technique taught in this disclosure is also compatible with any modulator order.
According to various embodiments, it is possible to combine a conventional multi-bit DAC with a voltage reference that is using a Chopper algorithm and provide at the same time for a DAC that is inherently linear and for a removal of offset and 1/f noise induced by the reference circuit. Moreover as mentioned above, there is no need to modify the voltage reference circuit. This combination is more powerful than a bit stream controlled reference signal because it cancels the offset of the voltage reference at each stage as will be explained below.
Basically, the principle switching pattern to generate an output voltage of the 5-level DAC as shown in
(E1−E2)Vref*C
where E2=0, 1, −1 after the transfer phase P2,
and E1=0, 1, −1 after the precharge phase P1.
Thus, depending on the switching sequence there are 9 possibilities of charge-transfer with such a DAC, but only 5 levels are reached by the total charge transferred. Here are all the possibilities:
This table shows that the only possible total charge transferred levels are: +2Vref*C, +Vref*C, 0, −Vref*C and −2Vref*C. This table assumes that Vref is stable and this shows that there are two possibilities for transferring +Vref*C, or −Vref*C, 3 possibilities for transferring 0, and only one for +2Vref*C or −2Vref*C. Conventional DACs, thus, merely select 5 suitable patterns to produce five distinct output voltages and use only those for operating the DAC.
According to various embodiments, a different approach is used. An algorithm can be combined with a chopped reference voltage Vref, especially if the chopping algorithm is synchronous with phase P1 and P2 of a pattern, when toggling happens between P1 and P2. Phases P1 and P2 are the precharge phase and the transfer phase of a pattern, respectively. If the reference voltage is chopped, a real voltage reference is assumed to produce an effective voltage reference Vrefeff=Vref+Voffset during P1 and Vrefeff=Vref−Voffset during P2 (the chopper switching is done between P1 and P2). This modifies the table of charge transfers as follows:
As can be seen, in the chopping Vref case, the total output charge differs but not for all combinations. For combinations #4 and #6 each phase generates an offset which is not cancelled out. However, these sequences do not need to be used because combination #5 generates a 0 charge with no offset influence. Similarly, for all even number of Vref transferred (even DAC inputs: #1 and #9), the offset is not propagated through, so this pattern cancels the offset for these cases. For the single Vref transfers though, the offset is transferred (#2, #3, #7 and #8 of Table 2) along with the voltage reference (add DAC inputs).
According to various embodiments, two techniques can be applied to cancel out the transferred offset: rotating capacitors/switching table lines alternatively for single transfers, or splitting the caps and apply two different patterns at the same time, and try to cancel the offset transferred. Lines 2 and 3 and lines 7 and 8 in Table 2 are transferring the same Vref*C charge and an opposite offset, namely ±Voffset*C charge. By combining 2 and 3 for a positive transfer and 7 and 8 for a negative transfer, offset cancellation can be achieved after each pair of transfers while transferring the right amount of Vref*C charge.
a and 4b show the patterns which can be used to generate a transfer with +Vref/2 using the circuit as shown in
a uses the same pattern as shown in
a uses the same pattern as shown in
According to a first embodiment as for example shown in
In this particular embodiment, the DAC capacitors are chosen to have a value of C/2. In other embodiments, these capacitors may have other nominal values. The entire switching circuit for the reference voltage is shown with numeral 150 in
The switching patterns for the upper and lower reference switching circuits will follow lines 2 and 3 for a +Vref*C transfer and lines 7 and 8 for a −Vref*C transfer and are shown in
The following Table 3 can be written for these transfers:
As mentioned above, instead of a single capacitor C, the capacitor is split into two. When C1=C2=C/2, the total charge transferred is +Vref*C, so the offset cancellation is effective for this single Vref*C transfer. The same table can be written for a −Vref*C transfer:
Again, when
the total charge transferred is Vref*C, so the offset cancellation is also realized. Obtaining exactly
is not possible with analog components so in reality, the offset component on both +Vref*C and −Vref*C transfers is not completely cancelled by splitting caps and combining algorithms. However, the offset can be clearly reduced by this measure and, thus, the performance is improved.
The value of the remainder is equal to ±(C1−C2)Voffset=Serror. The charge transferred is SQ=±Vref*C± error where C=C1+C2. This error is however relatively small:
Typically, the matching of capacitors in an analog process can be evaluated to 0.1% so the ratio:
The Voffset is typically also about 0, 1% referred to Vref. So the ratio
is in the order of magnitude of
The other applicable technique, according to various embodiments can cancel the charge transferred proportional to the offset but needs an even number of transfers cycles to do so. This technique is not subject to a matching of capacitors as the same capacitor is used for two different patterns. By switching alternatively between the patterns of lines 2 and 3 for a +Vref*C transfer and 7 and 8 for a −Vref*C transfer we can rewrite the table as shown below in Table 4:
After two (or any even) number of samples, the Voffset contribution to the total charge transferred is cancelled in both cases. So if the total number of samples requiring a single Vref*C or Vref*C is even, a perfect offset cancellation is achieved. In case of an odd number, the total error induced by the offset contribution is ±Voffset*C, which is small if the total charge transferred is SQ=N*Vref*C, N being typically large if a large number of transfers is performed.
For example, if a DAC bitstream is: +1 +1 +1 −1 +1 +1 +1 −1 then a pattern sequence would look as follows: 2-3-2-8-2-3-2-8. The control system according to
Control system according to
Control system according to
in standard analog CMOS processes for caps matched.
Thus this may be a preferred algorithm because it induces less offset at each sample. When used in a sigma-delta modulator which order is greater than one, the rotating algorithm meets a slight modification to perform perfect offset induced charge cancellation after multiple integrations in the modulator loop (number of integrations=order of modulator). For higher orders cancellation, a fractal sequencing scheme may be required and can be implemented with the simple sequences:
for the +1 or −1 DAC inputs.
Combined with the serial switching technique, a second order sequence would result in a 2-3-3-2-2-3-3 . . . sequence as the switching sequence scheme. The graphical representation of this technique is shown in
The following section will explain the general differences between conventional systems and various embodiments. To this end, various scenarios are shown in
Now, sequence 2 generates a positive offset contribution and sequence 3 generates a negative contribution. All embodiments described so far use this concept. For example,
This concept can however be extended to a slower chopper algorithm frequency by modulating the chopper frequency with the switching algorithm. In other words, the reference chopper frequency is different from the charge-transfer frequency. This can be useful because it enables to operate with slow frequency chopping which consumes less power. However, according to an embodiment, the most efficient and preferable frequency is two times slower than each phase (same period as the bit stream period). Normally, the switching of the chopper would be
However, as shown in
Std chopper (toggles between each phase): 2-3-2-3 changed to 2-2-2-2
Note that the switching sequence 3 associated with chopping sequence
is equal to that of the switching sequence 2 associated with chopping sequence
Therefore using the 2 times slower chopper (toggles only between end of P1 and beginning of P2) changes the above 2-3-3-2 sequence to the: 2-2-3-3 sequence.
The graphs showed were for constant bit streams for purpose of the demonstration, if the bit stream differs, the graph is valid if the x-axis is considered to represent only the number of samples with the same DAC input. Then, each different input will have its own graph, even imports will show flat, equal to zero graphs and odd imports will show straight waveforms.
The above descriptions apply to a 2 phases architecture that has the advantage of being fast since the signal and reference are processed in parallel into 2 separated networks. However this architecture suffers of mismatch error between the signal and reference network. This mismatch error induces a gain error. As mentioned above, the matching between capacitors in an analog process is in the range of 0.1% leading to an accuracy of 0.1% on the ADC gain. In some applications, such gain error cannot be tolerated. Therefore a mismatch independent architecture is required.
There are mainly two approaches for achieving mismatch independent structures: Rotating capacitors and using the same capacitor set for the signal and reference path. When the rotating cap solution is chosen, one memory set per rotating capacitor configuration is required in the DAC. The cost is thus a more complex structure. When using the same capacitor set for the signal and reference path is chosen, the signal and reference are processed sequentially. This leads to a 4 (or more) phases architecture. The cost is a longer conversion time.
It is known that sigma-delta modulators having a gain of 1 between the input and reference path are not stable over the full Vref range. The stability range may reach 98 or 99% of the Vref range for 1st order modulators but decreases to 85% or less for 2nd order modulators, 70% or less for 3rd order modulators and further decreases when the modulator order is further increased. Therefore when a full Vref range is required for the input signal, it must be attenuated before being applied to the modulator.
Exact gain of ½ can easily be achieved with the proposed architecture of
While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted, described, and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/107,824 filed on Oct. 23, 2008 entitled “FIVE-LEVEL FEED-BACK DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER USING A CHOPPER VOLTAGE REFERENCE FOR A SWITCHED CAPACITOR SIGMA-DELTA ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER”, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6462612 | Roh et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6909388 | Quiquempoix et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7102558 | Deval | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040141562 | Plisch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20050117269 | Dec 2005 | WO |
20060023355 | Mar 2006 | WO |
20080014246 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008014246 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100103014 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61107824 | Oct 2008 | US |