Not applicable.
The invention relates generally to earth-boring bits used to drill a borehole for the ultimate recovery of oil, gas or minerals. More particularly, the invention relates to rolling cone rock bits and to an improved cutting structure for such bits. Still more particularly, the invention relates to enhancements in inner row cutter elements.
An earth-boring drill bit is typically mounted on the lower end of a drill string and is rotated by revolving the drill string at the surface or by actuation of downhole motors or turbines, or by both methods. With weight applied to the drill string, the rotating drill bit engages the earthen formation and proceeds to form a borehole along a predetermined path toward a target zone. The borehole formed in the drilling process will have a diameter generally equal to the diameter or “gage” of the drill bit.
A typical earth-boring bit includes one or more rotatable cone cutters that perform their cutting function due to the rolling movement of the cone cutters acting against the formation material. The cone cutters roll and slide upon the bottom of the borehole as the bit is rotated, the cone cutters thereby engaging and disintegrating the formation material in its path. The rotatable cone cutters may be described as generally conical in shape and are therefore referred to as rolling cones.
Rolling cone bits typically include a bit body with a plurality of journal segment legs. The rolling cones are mounted on bearing pin shafts that extend downwardly and inwardly from the journal segment legs. The borehole is formed as the gouging and scraping or crushing and chipping action of the rotary cones remove chips of formation material which are carried upward and out of the borehole by drilling fluid which is pumped downwardly through the drill pipe and out of the bit.
The earth disintegrating action of the rolling cone cutters is enhanced by providing the cone cutters with a plurality of cutter elements. Cutter elements are generally of two types: inserts formed of a very hard material, such as tungsten carbide, that are press fit into undersized apertures in the cone surface; or teeth that are milled, cast or otherwise integrally formed from the material of the rolling cone. Bits having tungsten carbide inserts are typically referred to as “TCI” bits, while those having teeth formed from the cone material are commonly known as “steel tooth bits.” In each instance, the cutter elements on the rotating cone cutters breakup the formation to form new borehole by a combination of gouging and scraping or chipping and crushing.
In oil and gas drilling, the cost of drilling a borehole is proportional to the length of time it takes to drill to the desired depth and location. The time required to drill the well, in turn, is greatly affected by the number of times the drill bit must be changed in order to reach the targeted formation. This is the case because each time the bit is changed, the entire string of drill pipes, which may be miles long, must be retrieved from the borehole, section by section. Once the drill string has been retrieved and the new bit installed, the bit must be lowered to the bottom of the borehole on the drill string, which again must be constructed section by section. As is thus obvious, this process, known as a “trip” of the drill string, requires considerable time, effort and expense. Accordingly, it is always desirable to employ drill bits which will drill faster and longer and which are usable over a wider range of formation hardness.
The length of time that a drill bit may be employed before it must be changed depends upon its ability to “hold gage” (meaning its ability to maintain a full gage borehole diameter), its rate of penetration (“ROP”), as well as its durability or ability to maintain an acceptable ROP. The form and positioning of the cutter elements (both steel teeth and tungsten carbide inserts) upon the cone cutters greatly impact bit durability and ROP and thus, are critical to the success of a particular bit design.
The inserts in TCI bits are typically inserted in circumferential rows on the rolling cone cutters. Most such bits include a row of inserts in the heel surface of the rolling cone cutters. The heel surface is a generally frustoconical surface and is configured and positioned so as to align generally with and ream the sidewall of the borehole as the bit rotates. The heel inserts function primarily to maintain a constant gage and secondarily to prevent the erosion and abrasion of the heel surface of the rolling cone.
In addition to the heel row inserts, conventional bits typically include a circumferential gage row of cutter elements mounted adjacent to the heel surface but oriented and sized in such a manner so as to cut the corner of the borehole. Conventional bits also include a number of additional rows of cutter elements that are located on the cones in circumferential rows disposed radially inward or in board from the gage row. These cutter elements are sized and configured for cutting the bottom of the borehole, and are typically described as inner row cutter elements.
Typically positioned on or near the apex of one or more of the rolling cone cutters, are cutter elements commonly referred to as a nose cutter or nose row cutters. Such cutters are generally responsible for cutting the central portion (or core) of the hole bottom. They may be positioned as a single cutter at or very near the apex of the cone cutter, or may be disposed in a circumferential row of several cutter element near to the cone apex.
In conventional TCI bits, conventional nose row cutters are typically of the chisel-shaped or conical designs. A chisel-shaped insert possesses a crest forming an elongated cutting edge that impacts the core portion of the hole bottom. By contrast, as compared to a standard chisel-shaped cutter, a conical insert is considered less aggressive as it has a relatively blunt cutting surface, and does not include the relatively sharp cutting edge of the chisel's crest. With only one cutting edge, a chisel-shaped insert employed as a nose row cutter will only contact the core approximately 1.25 times per bit revolution. At the same time, due to their greater numbers, a row of cutter elements in other locations on each cone contact the hole bottom with much greater frequency and thereby remove formation material faster than at the borehole center. In certain formations, this may result in a core of material that remains uncut and builds up in the center of the borehole, causing the drilling of the borehole to be slower and more costly. Furthermore, the cutting crest of a conventional chisel shaped cutter element is relatively thin relative to the overall diameter of the cutter element. For example, the standard chisel shaped cutter element has relatively little supporting material to oppose a side force that is imposed on the opposite side of the chisel face. In part for this reason, chisel shaped inserts, particularly in hard formations, will tend to chip, and may break, more readily than a more blunt surface conical shaped insert, for example.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a nose row insert with a more aggressive cutting surface, so as to remove more material from the hole bottom with fewer revolutions of the bit. Such an enhanced design would result in a higher ROP and an increase in the footage drilled. At the same time, however, the cutter element should be able to withstand drilling in formations typically encountered when drilling with TCI bits. Thus, the desire for a more aggressive nose row cutter must be tempered by the need for providing a durable and relatively long-lasting cutter, one that will resist breakage even in formations harder than those typically drilled with steel tooth bits.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed which provide an earth boring bit having enhancements in cutter element design that provide the potential for increased ROP, as compared with bits employing cutter elements of conventional shape. The embodiments disclosed include cutter elements having aggressive cutting surfaces that have particular application in the nose region of a rolling cone cutter.
The cutter elements of the present invention are preferably disposed on the nose portion of a cone cutter of a rolling cone bit, but may be employed elsewhere on the cone cutter. The cutter elements include a base, a cutting portion extending from the base, and a plurality of cutting lobes extending radially from the cutting portion. In certain embodiments, each lobe preferably includes a generally forward-facing cutting face, and a non-planar trailing surface, with the two surfaces meeting to form a nonlinear cutting edge. The trailing surface recedes away from the cutting edge, and may have a partial dome shape, a frustoconical surface, or other shapes. In certain preferred designs, the forward facing surface is substantially planar and extends generally parallel to the axis of the cutter element. The forward facing surface may be coplanar with, or offset from, a plane containing the axis. In other embodiments, the forward facing surface may be canted so as to form an angle relative to the central axis. The forward facing surface may likewise be curved, rather than substantially planar as may be advantageous for use in certain formations. The number of lobes on the cutting surface may vary depending upon the type of formation and the size of the bit and cutter element. The extending lobes may be recessed so as not to extend radially beyond the profile of the cutter element base, or may extend beyond the base profile so as to create relatively large lobes and large forward facing cutting surfaces and cutting edges as particularly advantageous when drilling in soft formation.
The cutter elements and drill bits described herein provide an aggressive cutting structure and cutter element having multiple cutting edges offering enhancements in ROP given that the cutter's multiple cutting edges will engage and cut the borehole bottom more times per bit revolution than conventional cutter elements having only a single cutting edge (chisel shaped) or the conventional conical cutter having only a relatively blunt cutting surface. Providing a trailing portion behind the forward facing cutting surface and a trailing surface on the trailing position that extends to the cutting edge provides substantial strength to the cutting lobes by buttressing the forward facing cutting surface and lessening the likelihood of the lobe chipping and breaking. Thus, it is believed that the inserts described herein provide a robust and durable cutter element particularly well suited for use in the nose row of a cone cutter on a rolling cone bit.
It will be understood that the number, size and spacing of the lobes may vary according to the application. The bits, rolling cone cutters, and cutter elements described herein provide opportunities for greater improvement in ROP. These and various other characteristics and advantages will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
For an introduction to the detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring first to
Referring now to
Referring still to
Referring back to
Referring again to
In the embodiment shown in
Nose insert 60, best shown in
Partial dome shaped trailing surface 65 includes leading end 86 and trailing end 87, leading end 86 being coextensive with cutting edge 66 and trailing end 87 being angularly spaced therefrom. Leading end 86 extends radially nearly to the outer profile of base 61, while trailing end 87 is further recessed from the outer profile 80 of the base, such recess at end 87 being designated by reference numeral 88 shown in
Referring to
As best shown in
Referring to
Likewise, lobes 63 and their position on cutting portion 62 may be described in terms of their angular length. More particularly, and is best shown in
The insert of
The multiple lobes and cutting faces, as explained above, provide more impacts or scraps on the hole bottom per revolution of the bit. This increased number of impacts helps to prevent core buildup in the borehole bottom as was prevalent with conventional nose row cutter elements that do not possess multiple cutting edges on the nose row cutter. The relatively sharp cutting edges of the multiple lobe cutter aggressively cut the formation material; however, at the same time, the cutting edge 66 and forward facing surface 64 is well supported by the partial dome shaped portion 65 that trails the cutting edge so as to provide substantial support and back up to prevent the cutting edge from chipping or breaking prematurely. Accordingly, the cutter element 60 described herein promotes enhanced cutting of the core bottom, particularly the central core, while providing durability that would surpass that of a paddle-like cutting blade that did not have the dome shaped portion backing up the blade.
Another embodiment of the preferred cutter element is shown in
Referring now to
A cutter element 260 such as that shown in
While the preferred embodiments described above are shown having four lobes per insert, it should be understood that the number of lobes may vary depending upon the application. Thus, for example, inserts 60, 160, 260 may instead be formed having two, three or even five or more lobes. Further, although the lobe's forward facing cutting surfaces previously discussed have been shown and described as being generally planar, and parallel to the central axis of the insert, that cutting surface may instead be angled relative to the insert's axis, and may be entirely curved or have non-planar regions for use in the softer formations.
For example, referring to
Another preferred cutter element 660 is shown in
Referring momentarily to
As described previously, to provide the desired enhanced cutting action, the multilobed cutter elements described above include lobes having forward facing cutting surfaces and trailing portions with curved trailing surfaces to buttress or support the forward facing surface. This structure is to be distinguished from a blade or paddle-like appendage extending from a cutter element where the forward facing and trailing surfaces are each generally planar. Without a lobe having a buttressing portion with a trailing surface tapering away from the outer extension of the forward facing cutting face towards the axis of the cutter element, the strength and durability necessary for cutting in hard formations will not be present. In the embodiments described herein, the buttressing portion that trails the forward facing cutting surface may be partially dome shaped, as previously described, or may have other non-planar surfaces shaped to curve or taper away from the outermost extension of the lobe towards the axis of the cutter element. For example, referring to
While various preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. The embodiments herein are exemplary only, and are not limiting. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above, but is only limited by the claims which follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/355,493 filed Jan. 31, 2003, entitled “Multi-Lobed Cutter Element for Drill Bit”, incorporated herein by references, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,624.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2578593 | Phipps | Dec 1951 | A |
3388757 | Fittinger | Jun 1968 | A |
3442352 | McElya et al. | May 1969 | A |
3946820 | Knapp | Mar 1976 | A |
4056153 | Miglierini | Nov 1977 | A |
4058177 | Langford, Jr. et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4086973 | Keller et al. | May 1978 | A |
4108260 | Bozarth | Aug 1978 | A |
4334586 | Schumacher | Jun 1982 | A |
4352400 | Grappendorf et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4511006 | Grainger | Apr 1985 | A |
4586574 | Grappendorf | May 1986 | A |
4716977 | Huffstutler | Jan 1988 | A |
4722405 | Langford, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4832139 | Minikus et al. | May 1989 | A |
4951762 | Lundell | Aug 1990 | A |
D324527 | Slutz | Mar 1992 | S |
5131478 | Brett et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5172777 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172779 | Siracki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197555 | Estes | Mar 1993 | A |
5201376 | Williams | Apr 1993 | A |
5303787 | Brady | Apr 1994 | A |
5322138 | Siracki | Jun 1994 | A |
5323865 | Isbell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341890 | Cawthorne et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351768 | Scott et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372210 | Harrell | Dec 1994 | A |
5407022 | Scott et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415244 | Portwood | May 1995 | A |
5421423 | Huffstutler | Jun 1995 | A |
5421424 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429199 | Sheirer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5429200 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5452771 | Blackman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5479997 | Scott et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5518077 | Blackman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535839 | Brady | Jul 1996 | A |
5542485 | Pessier et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560440 | Tibbits | Oct 1996 | A |
5592995 | Scott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5636700 | Shamburger, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644956 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697462 | Grimes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709278 | Crawford | Jan 1998 | A |
5746280 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752573 | Scott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755301 | Love et al. | May 1998 | A |
5813485 | Portwood | Sep 1998 | A |
5819861 | Scott et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833020 | Portwood et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839526 | Cisneros et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5871060 | Jensen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874060 | Armour et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881828 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887655 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887668 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890550 | Swadi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915486 | Portwood et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5950745 | Ingmarsson | Sep 1999 | A |
5967245 | Garcia et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6029759 | Sue et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053263 | Meiners | Apr 2000 | A |
6059054 | Portwood et al. | May 2000 | A |
6105693 | Ingmarsson | Aug 2000 | A |
D430578 | Brady | Sep 2000 | S |
6119798 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6176332 | Massa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176333 | Doster | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196340 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202752 | Kuck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241034 | Steinke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6595305 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601662 | Matthias et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6883623 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883624 | McDonough | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20020108789 | Schautt | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040149493 | McDonough | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163851 | McDonough et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173384 | Yong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 391 683 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 446 765 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 527 506 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 902 159 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2 361 497 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2 369 841 | Jun 2002 | GB |
2 393 982 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2105124 | Feb 1998 | RU |
2153569 | Jul 2000 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050189149 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10335493 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11113747 | US |