FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to a new and improved golf club having a secondary barrier behind a striking face portion via a panel member. The panel member allows the golf club head to incorporate exotic materials at the rear aft portion of the golf club head without sacrificing performance. More specifically the secondary barrier preserves the acoustic characteristics of a metallic golf club head while allowing the rear aft portion of the golf club head to be made out of exotic materials that may generally degrade the acoustic characteristics of a golf club head.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The utilization of lightweight materials in a golf club head is generally known. The utilization of lightweight materials in a golf club head removes mass from specific portions of the golf club head and allows it to be redistributed to more optimized areas. U.S. Pat. No. 6,612,938 to Murphy et al. illustrates one of the earlier attempts to use exotic materials in a golf club head such as plies of pre-preg material.
However, despite the potential gains in the discretionary mass gained by the utilization of such lightweight material, the utilization of such material usually comes with some drawbacks. More specifically, the utilization of such lightweight material may generally come with an undesirable acoustic characteristic, making the golf club undesirable to a golfer irrespective of performance.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,064,197 to Eddy back in 1991 provides one of the earlier attempts to adjust the acoustic characteristics of a golf club by providing a first forward chamber in the head opening to the club head face, wherein the forward chamber vibrates at a given primary frequency.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,651,975 to Soracco provided another example of an attempt to address the acoustic characteristics associated with golf clubs that utilizes exotic material. More specifically, Soracco provided a golf club head with sound tuning composite members forming at least a portion of the surface of the golf club head.
Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 8,849,635 to Hayase et al. went above and beyond the mere basic design of a golf club head for acoustic characteristics and even made an attempt to predict modal damping ratio of composite golf club heads.
Despite the above, none of the references provide a method to improve the performance of a golf club head by providing a way to improve the performance of a golf club head utilizing advanced materials all while providing a clean way to address the degradation of the acoustic characteristics of the golf club head. Hence, it can be seen from the above that a golf club design that is capable of achieving both of the goal of incorporating exotic lightweight materials in order to increase discretionary mass as well as achieving a desirable acoustic characteristic while minimizing the undesirable sound and feel of the golf club head.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One aspect of the present invention is a golf club head comprising of a frontal acoustic chamber located at a front side of the golf club head and made out of a first material having a first volume, and a rear weight saving chamber located rearward of the frontal acoustic chamber at least partially made out of a second material having a second volume, wherein the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber are separated by a panel member that bifurcates the golf club head by connecting to a crown portion and a sole portion, and wherein said second material has a lower density than said first material, and wherein the golf club head has a Front to Rear Volume Ratio of less than about 0.35, the Front to Rear Volume Ratio defined as the first volume of the frontal acoustic chamber divided by a second volume of the rear weight saving chamber.
In another aspect of the present invention is a golf club head comprising of a frontal acoustic chamber located at a front side of the golf club head and made out of a first material having a first volume, and a rear weight saving chamber located rearward of the frontal acoustic chamber at least partially made out of a second material having a second volume, wherein the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber are separated by a panel member that bifurcates the golf club head by connecting to a crown portion and a sole portion, and wherein said second material has a lower density than said first material, and wherein the panel member is further comprised of an upper sub-panel member, a middle sub-panel member, and a lower sub-panel member, and all three panel members are all placed at different angles relative to a striking face.
In another aspect of the present invention is a golf club head comprising of a frontal acoustic chamber located at a front side of the golf club head and made out of a first material having a first volume, and a rear weight saving chamber located rearward of the frontal acoustic chamber at least partially made out of a second material having a second volume, wherein the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber are separated by a panel member that bifurcates the golf club head by connecting to a crown portion and a sole portion, and wherein said second material has a lower density than said first material, wherein the panel member is curved away from the front side of the golf club head such that a center of the panel member is placed further away from a striking face than at a crown and a sole portion of the panel member.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings shows a frontal perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 of the accompanying drawings shows a rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with the present invention wherein the crown is removed to illustrate internal components;
FIG. 4 of the accompanying drawings shows an exploded perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 5 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 6 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 9 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with a further alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 10 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 11 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 12 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 13 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 14 of the accompanying drawings shows a partial rear perspective view of a golf club head in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 15 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 16 of the accompanying drawings shows an exploded perspective of a golf club head in accordance with an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 17 of the accompanying drawings shows a cross-sectional view of a golf club head in accordance with an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 18 of the accompanying drawings shows a time sequence diagram representing the amplitude of the sound of a golf club head in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 19 of the accompanying drawings shows a time sequence diagram representing the amplitude of the sound of an exemplary prior art golf club head;
FIG. 20 of the accompanying drawings shows a spectrogram of the frequency and power of the sound of a golf club head in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 21 of the accompanying drawings shows a spectrogram of the frequency and power of the sound of a golf club head in accordance with a prior art golf club head.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The following detailed description describes the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
Various inventive features are described below and each can be used independently of one another or in combination with other features. However, any single inventive feature may not address any or all of the problems discussed above or may only address one of the problems discussed above. Further, one or more of the problems discussed above may not be fully addressed by any of the features described below.
FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings shows a perspective view of a golf club head 100 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The golf club head 100 shown in FIG. 1 provides only a rough sketch of the externals components of the golf club head 100 without illustrating the internal workings of the golf club head 100. More specifically, golf club head 100 will generally have a striking face 102 placed at a frontal portion of a chassis 101 the golf club head 100, a sole portion 106 located at the bottom of an aft portion of the chassis 101, and a crown portion 104 located at the top of an aft portion of the chassis 101. The striking face 102, together with the chassis 101, which includes the frontal portion and the skirt portion, may generally be made out of a first material having a density of between about 4.0 g/cc and about 4.7 g/cc, more preferably between about 4.1 g/cc and about 4.6 g/cc, and most preferably about 4.4 g/cc. The first material in most cases may generally be a titanium metallic material such Titanium 8-1-1, ATI 425 Titanium, SP 700 Titanium, KS 120 Titanium, KS 100 Titanium, Ti 6-4, or any other type of titanium material having the density recited above without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. However, in alternative embodiments of the present invention, the first material may be steel in a fairway type of construction without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. The crown portion 104 and the sole portion 106 in accordance with this embodiment of the present invention may be made out of a second lightweight material having a lower density than the remainder of the golf club head in order to achieve the weight savings desired without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. The lightweight second material could be made out of aluminum type material with a density of between about 2.5 g/cc and about 2.9 g/cc, a magnesium material with a density of about 1.738 g/cc, a wooden material that may have a density as low as 0.6 g/cc, but most commonly a fiber reinforced plastic composite type material may be used having a density of between about 1.2 g/cc to about 1.8 g/cc. More information regarding composite materials with a low fiber areal mass in a golf club head may be found in U.S. Patent Publication 2015/0360094 to Deshmukh, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Although not visible from FIG. 1, the golf club head 100 in accordance with this embodiment of the present invention may be internally separated into a frontal acoustic chamber and a rear weight saving member, creating a dual chambered golf club head 100 that is capable of achieving improved performance characteristics by increasing the discretionary weight of the golf club all while preserving the acoustic signature of the golf club head 100.
FIG. 2 of the accompanying drawings shows a rear perspective view of a golf club head 200 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention. Golf club head 200 may generally be comprised out of very similar components illustrated in FIG. 1, comprising of a metallic chassis 201, a striking face 202, a crown 204, and a sole 206. However, in this angle shown in FIG. 2, the internal components of the golf club head 200 can be shown more clearly if the crown 204 cover is removed for illustration purposes.
FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings shows a perspective view of a golf club head 300 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the crowns cover is removed. The removal of the crown cover allows the internal components of the golf club head 300 to be shown more clearly. More specifically, FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings shows the rear weight saving chamber component of the golf club head 300. The rear weight saving chamber shown here is created by a panel member 310 that separates the frontal acoustic chamber from the rear weight saving chamber. The panel member 310 in accordance with this embodiment of the present invention may generally be multi-facetted. More specifically, the panel member 310 shown in FIG. 3 contains at least one facet or bend that separates the panel member 310 into different sub-components to further improve the acoustic signature of the golf club head 300. The faceting of the panel member 310 shown in FIG. 3 may create three different sub-panel members 310a, 310b, and 310c. The upper sub-panel member 310a may generally be connected to the crown portion of the golf club head 300; the middle sub-panel member 310b may generally be connected to the bottom of the upper sub-panel member 310a; and the bottom sub-panel member 310c may generally be connected to the bottom of the middle sub-panel member 310b and also connected to the sole portion of the golf club head 300.
In addition to illustrating the panel member 310, FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawing providing a cut open view of golf club head 300 also illustrates a plurality of circular pressure release holes 312a and 312b located in the middle sub-panel member 310b of the panel member 310. The plurality of two or more pressure release holes 312a and 312b allows pressure built up in the frontal acoustic chamber during impact with a golf ball to travel towards the rear weight saving chamber to minimize any undesirable acoustic effects whenever the design of the golf club head 300 necessitates their utilization. In this exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the plurality of pressure release holes 312a and 312b may have an opening area of between about 15 mm to about 25 mm, more preferably between about 17 mm and about 23 mm, and most preferably about 20 mm. It should be noted here that although the present embodiment shows a plurality of two pressure release holes 312a and 312b, the present invention can incorporate only one pressure release hole 312, or more than two pressure release hole 312 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. Moreover, although the present embodiment of the present invention shows that the pressure release holes 312a and 312b are located in the middle sub-panel member 310b, they can be located at other portions of the panel member 310 to achieve similar goals without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. In fact, in alternative embodiments of the present invention, the golf club head 300 could be constructed without any pressure release holes 312a and 312b without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. (See FIG. 7)
Finally FIG. 3 of the accompanying drawings also shows a plurality of ribs 314a and 314b, that connect to the bottom sub-panel member 310c and the sole to provide structural rigidity to the panel member 310 to further tune the acoustic signature of the golf club head 300 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. It should be noted that although FIG. 3 shows two ribs 314a and 314b, the present invention only incorporates the ribs 314a and 314b when the acoustic signature of the golf club head 300 needs further tuning. In fact, in alternative embodiments of the present invention, one rib, three ribs, or any multiple ribs may be used as necessary without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. In fact, in extreme situations, the current design may not incorporate any ribs at all. (See FIG. 6)
FIG. 4 of the accompanying drawings shows an exploded view of a golf club head 400 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The exploded view of the golf club head 400 shown here in FIG. 4 allows the relationship between the various components to be shown more clearly. More specifically, FIG. 4 introduces the ability of the sole 406 of the golf club head to be detachable from the chassis 401 of the golf club head 400. The sole 406 works in conjunction with the crown 404 to create the rear weight saving chamber previously discussed, which once again, is separated from the frontal acoustic chamber via a panel member 410. This exploded frontal view with the striking face 402 removed, allows the frontal acoustic chamber to be shown more clearly, and the frontal view of the panel member 410 to be shown as well. Similar to the discussion above, the panel member 410 may be further divided into an upper sub-panel member (not shown in FIG. 4), a middle sub-panel member 410b, and a lower sub-panel member 410c, all while incorporating the same pressure release hole 412a and 412b (not shown in FIG. 4).
In order for the relationship between the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber to be shown more clearly, a cross-sectional view of the golf club head 400 may be more helpful. FIG. 5 of the accompanying drawings does exactly this by providing a cross-sectional view of a golf club head 500 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Although previous discussion has hinted at the existence of a frontal acoustic chamber 520 and a rear weight saving chamber 522 within the internals of the golf club head 500, the cross sectional view of the golf club head 500 identifies the here as frontal acoustic chamber 520 and rear weight saving chamber 522, which are separated and bifurcates the golf club via a panel member 510. The frontal acoustic chamber 520 shown here is comprised out of a frontal portion of a chassis of the golf club head 500 as well as the striking face 502 insert. The rear weight saving chamber 522 may generally be comprised of at least one composite panel that helps achieve the weight saving goals of the golf club head 500. The word “composite” as used in this application may refer to the general term of any material that has two or more different materials combined together, however, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, fiber reinforced plastic is the general material. In this specific embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the golf club head 500 incorporates two composite panels by incorporating a lightweight composite crown 504 and a lightweight composite sole 506 to maximize the weight savings; however, in alternative embodiments either one of the pieces may be used exclusively without the other component without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
The cross-sectional view of the golf club head 500 shown in FIG. 5, in addition to showing the relationship between the frontal acoustic chamber 520 and the rear weight saving chamber 522, also provides a perspective on their relative volumes to one another to create a very critical volume ratio. First and foremost, this cross-sectional view, is taken along a plane that runs front and back through the golf club head, taken down the center through the center of the face. The golf club head 500 may generally have a Front to Rear Volume Ratio of less than about 0.50, more preferably less than about 0.40, and most preferably less than about 0.35; wherein the Front to Rear Volume Ratio is defined by Equation (1) below:
More specifically, the frontal acoustic chamber 520 may generally have a volume of less than about 230 cc, more preferably less than about 150 cc, and most preferably less than about 100 cc; while the rear weight saving chamber 522 may have a volume of greater than about 230 cc, more preferably greater than about 310 cc, and most preferably greater than about 360 cc.
In order to create the Front to Rear Volume Ratio identified above, the panel member 510 shown in this embodiment may generally have a thickness d1 of between about 0.1 mm to about 2.0 mm, more preferably between about 0.25 mm to about 1.0 mm, and most preferably about 0.5 mm. The thickness of the panel member 510 is important and critical to the proper functioning of the golf club head 500, as it creates the necessary barrier between the frontal acoustic chamber 520 and the rear weight saving chamber 522. If the thickness d1 of the panel member 510 is too thick, then the correlation between the vibration of the frontal acoustic chamber 520 and the rear weight saving chamber 522 might no longer be synchronized, eliminating the efficiency of the frontal acoustic chamber 520. Alternatively, if the thickness d1 is too thin, then the correlation between the two chambers might be too high, allowing the acoustic signature to be over damped by the composite material used by the rear weight saving chamber 522. It should be noted here that although the thickness d1 is shown here as constant throughout the panel member 510, the thickness could be variable depending on the needs of the golf club head 500 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
FIG. 5 of the accompanying drawings also shows the placement of the panel member 510 relative to the frontal striking surface of the golf club head 500. In this exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the top of the panel member 510 may generally be placed at a distance d2 of between about 8 mm to about 36 mm, more preferably between about 9 mm to about 24 mm, and most preferably about 10 mm. The bottom of the panel member 510 may be placed at a distance d3 of between about 13 mm to about 51 mm, more preferably between about 14 mm to about 45 mm, and most preferably about 15 mm. It should be noted here that distance d3 here is intentionally greater than the distance d2 in order to create the acoustic characteristics desired in the frontal acoustic chamber 520. In order to achieve the acoustic signature, a specific ratio between the distance d2 of the top and the distance d3 of the bottom is maintained between about 0.45 and 0.70, more preferably between about 0.50 and about 0.60, and most preferably about 0.55; which is referred to as the Panel Offset Ratio. The Panel Offset Ratio is defined here by Equation (2) below:
FIG. 5 of the accompanying drawings also shows a specific geometry used to create the panel member 510 wherein the tri-facetted panel member 510 create a unique geometry wherein the center of the panel member 510 is further away from the striking face 502 to increase the volume of the frontal acoustic chamber 520. Alternatively speaking, it can be said that the panel member has a unique geometry wherein the center of the panel member 510 being placed further away from the striking face 502 than at the crown 504 and sole 506 portion of the panel member 510.
FIG. 5 of the accompanying drawings also shows more detail regarding the different facets created by the panel member 510 in creating the upper sub-panel member, the middle sub-panel member, and a lower sub-panel member. More specifically, a closer look at the panel member 510 in FIG. 5 shows that the upper sub-panel member may form an angle θ with the middle sub-panel member of between about 10 degree to about 15 degrees, more preferably between about 12 degrees to about 14 degrees, and most preferably about 13 degrees. The lower sub-panel member and the middle sub-panel member form an angle β of between about 16 degrees to about 20 degrees, more preferably between about 17 degrees to about 19 degrees, and most preferably about 18 degrees. It should be noted here that similar to the intentional difference between distances d2 and d3, the difference in the angle of the upper sub-panel member and the lower sub-panel member is intentional and critical in achieving the desired acoustic signature of the golf club head 500 as it alters the angle of the panel.
Finally, FIG. 5 shows a different attachment methodology for the crown 504 composite panel and the sole 506 composite panel, as it relates to the chassis of the golf club head 500. In this embodiment of the present invention, the crown 504 composite panel may generally be attached externally to the golf club head 500 via recesses created in the club head 500, wherein the sole 506 composite panel is attached internally to the golf club head 500 via the opening created in the crown 504 section. This combination of different attachment mechanisms is beneficial to the current invention because it allows different unique constructions that would previously be difficult to achieve. In one example, the internal attachment of the sole 506 composite piece would allow an internal rib to be added wherein such an internal rib would not be physically possible if the attachment was external. Although the present invention shows the crown 504 composite piece being external and the sole 506 composite piece being internal, the two attachment methodologies could be reversed with the crown piece 504 being installed internally without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
FIG. 6 of the accompanying drawings shows a golf club head 600 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the panel member 610 does not need any ribs. This alternative embodiment still incorporates a facetted panel member 610 that separates the panel member 610 in to three separate sub-components, and still utilizes pressure release holes 612a and 612b to achieve the acoustic properties desired. It should be noted that the necessity and placement of the ribs and pressure releases holes 612a and 612b may generally depend on the shape, contour, and choice of materials of the golf club head 600 and the acoustic signatures that it generates, and either of these components may exist independent of one another without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. In this current embodiment shown in FIG. 6, the golf club head 600 may exhibit sufficient structural stiffness in the panel member 610 in the bottom, but the acoustic attenuation within the frontal acoustic chamber builds up too much pressure and requires a relief via the pressure release holes 612a and 612b.
In fact, FIG. 7 of the accompanying drawings shows exactly one of the alternative embodiments of the present invention wherein the golf club head 700 incorporates a plurality of ribs 714a and 714b without the need for pressure release holes. This embodiment may be preferred when the acoustic signature of the golf club head is undesirable due to the lack of stiffness in the bottom portion of the panel member 710.
FIG. 8 of the accompanying drawings shows a golf club head 800 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the panel member 810 that separates the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber may be comprised out of one oversized pressure release hole 812 to help achieve differing acoustic frequencies that may be required for the golf club head 800. In this embodiment of the present invention, the area of the oversized pressure release hole 812 may generally be greater than about 2,000 mm2, more preferably greater than about 2,200 mm2, and most preferably greater than about 2,400 mm2. The oversized pressure release hole 812 may be desired in situations wherein the acoustic properties of the golf club head 800 require such a design.
In order to illustrate the relationship between the frontal acoustic chamber and the rear weight saving chamber in this alternative embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 9 is provided here showing a cross-sectional view of a golf club head 800 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention. In this cross-sectional view, it can be seen that the oversized pressure release hole 812 provides a large connection between the frontal acoustic chamber 820 and the rear weight saving chamber 822 not only for the acoustic properties as previously mentioned, but can also provide additional weight savings from the panel member 810 as well.
FIGS. 10 and 11 provide a rear opened view and a cross-sectional view of golf club heads 1000 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the oversized pressure release hole 1012 that is created on the panel member 1010 can be covered up by a lightweight panel 1016 to regain some of the acoustic characteristic and provide more separation between the frontal acoustic chamber 1020 and the rear weight saving chamber 1022. The lightweight panel 1016 may be attached using different means of attachment such as gluing, screwing, swaging, just to name a few. One thing to recognize is that because the placement of the lightweight panel 1016 is away from the frontal contact region, the stresses of impact are smaller, allowing more simplistic attachment means to be used.
FIGS. 12 and 13 provide a rear opened view and a cross-sectional view of a golf club head 1200 in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the panel member 1210 may take on a slightly different shape than previous embodiments. More specifically, FIGS. 12 and 13 show a golf club head 1200 wherein the panel member 1210 is curved away from the frontal portion of the golf club head 1200 instead of being facetted into three different zones as shown in previous embodiments. Alternatively it can be said that the shape of the panel member 1210 is continuously curved with the center of the panel member 1210 being placed further away from the striking face 1202 than at the crown 1204 and sole 1206 portion of the panel member 1210. Having a panel member 1210 that contains a continuous curvature is beneficial in certain embodiments wherein the acoustic signature of the frontal acoustic chamber 1220 requires more vibration, wherein the convergence points of the previous design would disrupts this vibration. In addition, the rear weight savings chamber 1222 may also benefit by minimizing the volume within that chamber. It should be noted although this embodiment of the present invention shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 does not incorporate any ribs or pressure release holes, they can be incorporated into this design depending on the acoustic needs of the golf club head 1200 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
FIGS. 14 and 15 provides a rear opened view and a cross-sectional view of a golf club head 1400 in accordance with an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the panel member 1410 is a complete vertical wall. Having the panel member in the shape of a completely vertical wall is generally less desirable in creating the appropriate acoustic signature in the frontal acoustic chamber 1420, as a completely vertical panel member 1410 can hinder the ability of the golf club head 1400 to generate the vibration needed to achieve a desirable sound. Conversely, the rear weight saving chamber 1422 is adjusted accordingly. However, in extreme situations wherein the profile of the golf club head 1400 requires such a design, this alternative embodiment of the present invention will provide a golf club head 1400 that can achieve the acoustic signature required.
FIGS. 16 and 17 provide an exploded perspective view and a cross-sectional view of a golf club head 1600 in accordance with an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention. In this alternative embodiment of the present invention, the golf club head 1600 is separated into two separate components, a forward metallic portion 1630 and an aft composite portion 1632. It should be noted that the forward metallic portion 1630 and the aft composite portion 1632 refer to the external physical components that make up the golf club head 1600, while the frontal acoustic chamber 1620 and the rear weight saving chamber 1622 refer to internal components within the golf club head 1600. In this embodiment of the present invention, the external physical components of the golf club head 1600 are a striking face 1602, a forward metallic portion 1630 having a frontal opening and forming a panel member 1610, and an aft composite portion 1632. The exploded view of the golf club head 1600 shown in FIG. 16, especially when compared to the exploded view of the golf club head 400 (shown in FIG. 4) demonstrate the difference between the two embodiments of the present invention. More specifically, it can be seen here that the present embodiment shown in FIG. 16 completely removes any metallic components from the rear portion of the golf club head 1600, utilizing a completely composite material at the back half of the golf club head 1600 to further achieve weight savings.
In order to illustrate the relationship between the external physical components and the internal components, FIG. 17 is provided with a cross-sectional view of the golf club head 1600. In this cross-sectional view of the golf club head 1600, it can be seen that the frontal acoustic chamber 1620, similar to all previous embodiments, is completely formed by the forward metallic portion 1630. However, the aft composite portion 1632 shown in this cross-sectional view illustrates that the entirety of the back of the golf club head 1600 is made out of a composite material, making the frontal acoustic chamber 1620 even more important in creating the proper acoustic signature. In this embodiment of the present invention, the aft composite portion 1632 is joined to the forward metallic portion 1630 via a lap joint wherein the aft composite portion 1632 is underneath the forward metallic portion 1630. This type of unique construction of putting the composite material underneath the metallic material can be beneficial to the performance of the golf club head 1600, as it lends itself well to the utilization of internal ribs to provide structural rigidity to a composite material that tends to need such a support. However, it should be noted here that although the golf club head shown in this embodiment of the present invention shows a lap joint, numerous other types of joints may be used as long as it is capable of connecting the forward metallic portion 1630 and the aft composite portion 1632 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
A lot of the aforementioned discussion relates to the utilization of the frontal acoustic chamber to create a desirable acoustic signature for a golf club head using different designs and embodiments. Hence, this invention would be remiss if it did not provide more information regarding what acoustic signature it achieves.
FIG. 18 of the accompanying drawing shows a time sequence diagram of the amplitude of the sound produced by the current inventive golf club head in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As the discussion previously indicated, the sound of the golf club head in accordance with the current inventive golf club head is one of the key factors in determining the performance of the golf club head. Before the discussion dives into the actual data, it is worthwhile to set forth the parameters of measurement of the present invention that will yield the results shown in FIG. 18. The time sequence diagram is created by gathering the audio profile using an audio recorder such as the TASCAM® DH-P2 Portable High Definition Stereo Audio recorder in conjunction with an A-weighting microphone. The recording is recorded at a distance of 39 inches away from the impact between the golf club head and the golf ball, which is determined as the distance that most closely simulates the distance to a golfer's ear as if he or she were hitting the golf club himself or herself. Data is sampled at 44.1 Hz to resolve the appropriate frequencies.
Moving onto the actual data shown in FIG. 18, we can see that on the x-axis, the time of the sound recording is shown in increments of 0.01 seconds; while on the other hand, on the y-axis shows the amplitude of the sound in millivolts. In the current sound recording shown in FIG. 18, it can be seen that the sound recording begins at a time 1844 right before impact with a golf ball and goes into a sinusoidal wave that reaches the peak amplitude Amax at a time point 1840. Once the sound reaches the peak amplitude Amax at time point 1840, the amplitude begins to resonate and begins decreasing until it dissipates completely. However, before it dissipates, it is worthwhile to note the point where the amplitude drops to beneath 10% of the peak amplitude Amax it is of particular interest, as it defines a time point 1842 where the sound amplitude becomes borderline negligible to the naked ear. Due to the inherent oscillating tendencies of sound shown here in FIG. 18, the determination of when the sound oscillation actually reaches down to 10% of the peak amplitude Amax can be difficult to discern visually. Hence, in order to help ease the determination, and in order to help pinpoint the oscillation variance inherent in these sound diagrams, the time where the amplitude is determined using a running average of the 5 most recent data points. In order to label this location of the 10% of the peak amplitude Amax it is said to occur at time point 1842 shown in FIG. 18. In the current exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the peak amplitude Amax is generally about 0.50 millivolts, occurring at a time point 1840 of about 0.007 seconds; while the diminished 10% peak amplitude Amax occurs at a time point 1842 of about 0.025 seconds. The time that occurs between these the time points 1840 and 1842 is critical to recognize because it helps define a Critical Time Tcritical. Critical Time Tcritical provides a way to quantify the quality and desirability of the sound of the golf club head as it impacts a golf ball. In the present embodiment of the present invention, the Critical Time Tcritical may be about 0.018 seconds.
A golf club head in accordance with the present invention may generally have a Critical Time Tcritical of greater than about 0.01 seconds and less than about 0.02 second, more preferably greater than about 0.015 seconds and less than about 0.02 seconds, and most preferably greater than about 0.0175 and less than about 0.02 seconds without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. Alternatively speaking, it can be said that the time it takes for the sound amplitude to go from the peak amplitude Amax to an amplitude that is 10% of peak amplitude Amax is defined as the Critical Time Tcritical, and is generally greater than about 0.01 seconds and less than about 0.02 seconds, more preferably greater than about 0.015 seconds and less than about 0.02 seconds, and most preferably greater than about 0.0175 seconds and less than about 0.02 seconds.
FIG. 19 of the accompanying drawings provides an illustration of a time sequence diagram of a prior art golf club head that incorporates a composite crown technology that fails to recognize the importance of the sound component of a golf club head. As it can be seen from FIG. 19, not only the is peak amplitude Amax significantly lower than the current inventive golf club head by being close to about 0.25 millivolts, it loses amplitude really quickly yielding a Critical Time Tcritical of less than about 0.01. In this exemplary prior art golf club head, the peak amplitude Amax occurs at a time of about 0.008 second, while the diminished 10% of peak amplitude Amax occurs at a time of about 0.015 second, yielding a Critical Time Tcritical of about 0.007 seconds, which is significantly less than the inventive golf club head Tcritical range of between about 0.01 seconds and 0.02 seconds. This prior art time sequence shown in FIG. 19 generally yields an undesirable sound, which the present invention avoids by adjusting the thickness ranges of the different materials and their respective layers.
FIG. 20 provides more information regarding the acoustic signature of a golf club head that yields a desirable sound in accordance with the current inventive golf club head. Although the amplitude and duration of the sound is an important factor, it does not paint the entire picture about capturing the sound of a golf club head. More specifically, the third component in accurately capturing the sound of a golf club head is the frequency of the sound emitted by the golf club head during impact with a golf ball. FIG. 20 provides exactly this information by presenting a spectrogram that provides a visual representation of the spectrum of frequency of sound as it varies over time. Although the spectrogram provided in FIG. 20 contains a lot of information, the key feature to focus on is the dominant acoustic frequency 2046 occurring at a frequency that is above 3500 kHz. The dominant frequency is determined by the shading decided in the power/frequency chart 2048 on the right of the spectrogram itself shown in FIG. 20.
Similar to the discussion above regarding the amplitude of the current inventive golf club head, to truly appreciate the difference in the spectrogram of the acoustic signature of the current golf club head, a prior art golf club head that contains an undesirable acoustic signature is presented here in FIG. 21. FIG. 21 of the accompanying drawings provides a spectrogram of a prior art golf club head that has composite material that produces an undesirable acoustic signature. Even a cursory examination of the spectrogram shown in FIG. 21 shows a clear difference from the current inventive golf club head spectrogram shown in FIG. 20. More specifically, a closer examination of FIG. 21 one can see that the dominant acoustic frequency 2146 occurs at a frequency that is significantly less than 3500 kHz, at a frequency of about 2100 kHz. This deficiency of frequency of 1100 kHz between this prior art golf club head and the current inventive golf club head, combined with the fast over damping of the amplitude of the golf club head explains the difference in a desirable acoustic signature and an undesirable acoustic signature previously discussed.
Finally, it is worth noting here that the panel member here may generally have its own resonate frequency of greater than 3300 kHz, which when combined with the other structures of the golf club head may yield the golf club head resonate frequency articulated above.
Other than in the operating example, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values and percentages such as those for amounts of materials, moment of inertias, center of gravity locations, loft, draft angles, various performance ratios, and others in the aforementioned portions of the specification may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear in the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the above specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Furthermore, when numerical ranges of varying scope are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values inclusive of the recited values may be used.
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the present invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Patent Application
20200023246
