Patent Grant
8616997
The present invention relates to golf clubs, and more specifically to multi-metal golf clubs.
Perimeter weighting in a golf club distributes the mass of the club toward the perimeter, minimizing the effects of off-center hits on the face of the golf club away from the sweet spot and producing more accurate and consistent golf ball trajectories. Perimeter weighting is achieved by creating a cavity in the back of the golf club opposite the face or hitting surface. The material weight saved by creating this cavity is redistributed around the perimeter of the golf club head. In general, larger cavity volumes correspond to increased amounts of mass distributed around the perimeter. Additionally, more of the perimeter weight is moved to the sole of the club to move the center of gravity downward and rearward.
Alternative approaches for moving the center of gravity of a golf club head rearward and downward in the club head utilize composite structures. These composite structures utilize two, three, or more materials that have different physical properties including different densities. By positioning materials that provide the desired strength characteristics with less weight near the crown or top line of a golf club head, a larger percentage of the overall weight of the golf club head is shifted towards the sole of the club head. This results in the center of gravity being moved downward and rearward. This approach is advantageously applicable to muscle back iron clubs or fairway woods, as this will help to generate loft and power behind and below the ball. However, composite materials must be bonded together, for example by welding, swaging, or using bonding agents such as epoxy, and may be subject to delamination or corrosion over time. This component delamination or corrosion results in decreased performance in the golf club head and can lead to club head failure.
Therefore, there remains a need for a composite golf club head that utilizes components having different densities designed in such a way as to minimize the problems associated with delamination, corrosion, or separation of the components.
The present invention is directed to golf club heads constructed from composite materials. The golf club head includes a body portion, for example a cast or forged body portion, made from a first metal to which is attached a face insert made from a second metal. The first and second metals are selected so that the first metal has a higher density than the second metal. An example of suitable metals includes titanium or steel for the first metal and aluminum for the second metal. The face insert is positioned on the front of the body portion adjacent the top line (or crown) and forms at least a portion of the hitting surface of the club head. In order to minimize delamination or separation between the body and the face insert, an interlocking structure is preferably formed in the body portion and arranged to interlock with the face insert when the face insert is fitted onto the body portion. This interlocking structure includes one or more channels running through the top section of the body portion to which the face insert is attached. Upon attachment, the face insert is interlocked with the channels, providing sufficient and stable attachment between the face insert and the body portion. The channel is shaped to further enhance the connection between the two components. These shapes include, but are not limited to, rectangular cross sections and cross sections having overhangs such as dove tail cross-sections. The present invention is also directed at anodizing at least one part of the golf club head, preferably the face insert. In an alternative embodiment, all the components of the club head are anodized. The face insert, the body of the club head or both can be anodized. For example, the face insert can be made from an anodized aluminum, or the body portion can be made from anodized titanium, or both. A polymer such as PTFE, polyurethane or polyurea can be added to the anodized layer to enhance the performance of the clubs.
An embodiment of the present invention teaches a golf club head having a body portion and a face insert. The front of the body portion further comprises a cutout designed to receive the face insert. The body portion is preferably comprised of a high-strength metal such as stainless steel, titanium or titanium alloy. The face insert is preferably comprised of a metal having a lower density than that of the body portion. More preferably, the face insert comprises an aluminum metal matrix composite (MMC). The face insert preferably has a plurality of feet to be cold worked into a pocket in the cutout. The feet may have notches or angled surfaces to facilitate their bending into the pocket.
The golf club head of the present invention may also include an insert disposed to the top line, said insert comprising a lightweight material. Additionally, the golf club head may include at least one weight member disposed to the back, located behind and below the center of gravity of the club head.
Referring now to the accompanying
Improvement in the location of the center of gravity of golf club heads in accordance with the present invention is achieved through the use of a composite construction that utilizes various materials having varying weights or densities. In particular, golf club head 10 utilizes two materials. Body portion 24 is constructed of a first material, for example a first metal, having a first weight or density. Suitable materials for the body portion 24 include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, carbon steel, beryllium copper, titanium and metal matrix composites (MMC). Preferably, body portion 24 is made from a higher density metal such as stainless steel or titanium. Club head 10 also includes face insert 12 attached to front 32 of body portion 24. Face insert 12 is constructed of a second material, i.e., a second metal having a second density. Suitable materials for face insert 12 include titanium, aluminum and alloys thereof. In one embodiment, the first weight or the first density is greater than the second weight or second density.
In order to move the center of gravity of club head 10 downward and to the rear, lightweight face insert 12 is attached to body portion 24 so that face insert 12 is disposed on front 32 of body portion 24 adjacent crown or top line 14. Therefore, face insert 12 forms a part of the club face or hitting surface of club head 10. To minimize delamination of face insert 12 from body portion 24, body portion 24 includes interlocking structure 25 formed on at least a portion of front 32 of body portion 24 adjacent top line 14. When face insert 12 is attached to or press fit on front 32 of body portion 24, face insert 12 is secured and anchored in interlocking structure 25. Optionally, adhesives, welds or other bonding agents can be used to help secure face insert 12 into interlocking structure 25. The interaction and meshing of face insert 12 with interlocking structure 25 is sufficient to fixedly secure face insert 12 to body portion 24.
In one embodiment, interlocking structure 25 contains at least one channel 26 running through a top of front 32 of body portion 24. Alternatively, a plurality of parallel channels 26 are formed in front 32 of body portion 24, further defining a plurality of associated ridges or raised portions 28. In one embodiment, the plurality of parallel channels 26 are arranged substantially parallel to top line 14 or sole 20 of body portion 24. In one embodiment, face insert 12 is pressed onto body portion 24, such that the second metal of face insert 12 substantially fills each channel 26 when face insert 12 is attached to body portion 24. Although channel 26 can be arranged as any shape including curves and annular shapes, preferably, channel 26 is a generally rectilinear line arranged parallel to sole 20.
By embedding face insert 12 in interlocking member 25 having channel 26, a stronger more resilient bond is formed between face insert 12 and body portion 24. Depending on the shape, and in particular the profile in cross section, of the channel, both increased surface area contact and increased mechanical binding is achieved between body portion 24 and face insert 12 when press fit together. In one embodiment as illustrated in
In another embodiment, interlocking member 25 comprises a plurality of upstanding posts 27 formed by intersecting channels 26, e.g., one set of horizontal channels 26 and another set of vertical channels 26 as shown in
In one embodiment, in order to form the interlocking structure on the front of the body portion, at least one channel is formed that runs through the portion of the front of the case body. Alternatively, a plurality of parallel channels is formed in the front of the body such that each channel is parallel to at least one of the top lines or the sole of the body portion. The channel can be formed to have a generally rectangular cross section. Alternatively, the channel is formed to have a dove tail shaped cross section. Having formed the interlocking structure in the front of the body, the face insert is pressed onto the front of the cast body to secure a portion of the face insert in the interlocking structure.
Exemplary embodiments in accordance with the present invention include a method for making a golf club head by forming an interlocking structure on at least a portion of the front of the body portion of golf club head adjacent a top line thereof. As was described above, the body includes the top line, sole, toe, heel, front and back opposite the front opposite, and the body is made from a first metal. A face insert is attached to the front of the cast body by securing a portion of the face insert in the interlocking structure of the body. The face insert is constructed of a second metal. The first and second metals are selected such that the first metal has a greater density or weight than the second metal. For example, the first metal is selected to be titanium or a titanium alloy, and the second metal is selected to be aluminum or an aluminum alloy. The face insert 12 can occupy between 10% and 40% of the volume of the club head.
Low-density, high-strength alloys such as those made from aluminum are particularly suitable for the present invention. The following table illustrates the masses and thickness of corresponding typical face inserts for iron-type golf clubs:
The differences in the thickness of the face inserts for the different materials are necessary due to the varying material strengths; these face inserts have substantially similar strengths. Of the three materials, steel is the strongest, and thus can have the thinnest face, but it has a higher density than both aluminum and titanium. Consequently, even a thinner steel face has a mass greater than either of the titanium or high-strength aluminum faces. Furthermore, the high-strength aluminum face insert's low density allows more mass to be redistributed for an improved center of gravity location and size of the sweet spot.
When a low-density metal such as a high-strength aluminum alloy is used for a face insert, it should be an alloy with suitable material strength and mechanical properties such as yield strength, tensile strength, hardness, elongation, etc., to avoid club failure or performance deterioration. Preferably, a high-strength aluminum alloy such as an alloy containing Scandium and 7-series high strength aluminum alloy (“Sc-7”) or an aluminum alloy containing a percentage of ceramic (“M5C”) is used. Material properties for these alloys, as well as suitable alloys MMC-7 and 13A, are listed in the table below.
However, aluminum alloys, including high-strength aluminum alloys such as Sc-7 and M5C, can be susceptible to corrosion, and in some cases more than traditional stainless steel or titanium materials. When aluminum alloys are in contact with steel alloys, galvanic corrosion can also adversely affect the aluminum.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the metals of the inventive golf club are oxidized, more preferably anodized, to improve its strength and corrosion resistance. Oxidation of many untreated metals such as aluminum occurs naturally as the metal undergoes prolonged contact with air. Anodization is a process used to modify the surface of a metal, and it produces a much more uniform, more dense, and harder oxidation layer than what is formed by natural oxidation. It can be used to protect the metal from abrasion or corrosion, create a different surface topography, alter the crystal structure, or even color the metal surface. During anodization, a chemical reaction occurs, producing an oxide layer bonded to the surface of the metal. For example, to anodize an aluminum or aluminum alloy object, the object is first pre-treated by an ordinary degreasing. Then the surface is freed of scratches or existing oxides, preferably by an etching process. The object is submerged in a chromic acid or more preferably a sulfuric acid solution. Next, an aluminum oxide layer is made on the object by passing a DC current through the chromic acid or sulfuric acid solution, with the aluminum object serving as the anode. The current releases hydrogen at the cathode and oxygen at the surface of the aluminum anode, creating a buildup of aluminum oxide. Anodizing at 12 volts DC, a piece of aluminum with an area of about 15.5 square inches can consume roughly 1 ampere of current. In commercial applications the voltage used is usually in the range of about 15 to 21 volts. Conditions such as acid concentration, solution temperature and current are controlled to allow the formation of a consistent oxide layer, which can be many times thicker than would otherwise be formed. This oxide layer increases both the hardness and the corrosion resistance of the aluminum surface. The oxide forms as microscopic hexagonal “pipe” crystals of corundum, each having a central hexagonal pore, which is also the reason that an anodized part can take on color in the dyeing process. Following the formation of a satisfactory oxide coating, the anodized object is often sealed to maximize the degree of abrasion resistance. Sealing can be accomplished by immersing the object in a sealing medium, such as a 5% aqueous solution of sodium or potassium chromate (pH 5.0 to 6.0) for 15 minutes at a temperature from about 90° C. to 100° C., boiling de-ionized water, cobalt or nickel acetate, or other suitable chemical solutions.
Different types of anodizing, Type I, II, and III, are explained in MIL-Spec MIL-A-8625F (Anodic Coatings for Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Most preferably, the face insert is hard-anodized with a Type III coating according to MIL-A-8625F. This hard anodic coating is thicker than standard Type I or Type II anodic coatings by up to 0.0035 inches, and penetrates deeper within the coated metal than standard Type I or Type II anodic coatings. The following table from MIL-A-8625F shows the common thickness ranges among the types of anodic coatings.
Commercial examples of Type III-compliant anodizing processes include the Sanford Hardcoat® process by Duralectra of Natick, Mass. and hardcoat anodizing done by Alpha Metal Finishing Co. of Dexter, Mich., both of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The Type III hard-anodizing process is similar to Type I and II processes, but Type III uses a sulfuric acid bath at a lower temperature, approaching 0° C., as well higher currents. In accordance with MIL-A-8625F, Type III coatings are generally not applied to aluminum alloys having a nominal copper content in excess of 5% or nominal silicon content in excess of 8%. Alloys which have a porosity of greater than about 5% less preferred for Type III coatings. In addition, Because Type III coatings have increased abrasion resistance, sealing or infusing the coating with a polymer in the same manner as Type I and II, as discussed in more detail below, is not required, and the coating can remain somewhat porous. Furthermore, having a porous unsealed structure allows the hard-anodic coating to be infused with a colored dye to change the appearance of the object, or a polymer such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTEE) or a polyepoxide (epoxy) or polyurethane-based resin to adjust the frictional characteristics of the object.
A method for infusing a hard-anodic coating with a polymer is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,439,712 to Hattori et al. entitled “Method for Making a Composite Aluminum Article,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Once the hard-anodization process is complete, the anodized object is immersed in an infusion solution. This infusion solution contains positively-charged polymer particles dispersed into the solution using a nonionic active agent. The solution and the aluminum object are heated to a temperature ranging from 40° C. to 80° C., and a voltage of 2 to 10 volts is applied. The aluminum object acts as an anode, and the positively-charged polymer particles become absorbed into the hard anodic coating to form a uniform monomolecular layer. As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, any positively-charged polymer particles can be used, and depending upon the type of alloy or polymer that is used, the temperature and voltage may vary.
Although hard-anodic coatings are often uncolored, gray, or clear, the face insert may be hard-anodized with a colored or dyed coating to create an improved aesthetic effect. The Sanford Hardcoat® process by Duralectra mentioned above has the capability of applying a hard-anodic coat with color to aluminum. Coloring can also be accomplished through a two-step electrolytic method, an integral coloring process which combines anodizing and coloring, organic or inorganic dyeing through polymer infusion as mentioned above, interference coloring, etc. Such a colored coating could be used to effectively outline or shade a hitting area or “sweet spot” on the club head. Sweet spot 114 in
The present invention is not limited to examples wherein only the face insert is hard-anodized. Although face insert 102 is preferably constructed from a lighter, less dense material than club head body 104, it is possible to attach the face insert to club head body 104 prior to the anodization process. As shown in
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
An optional sole plate 108 may be hard-anodized with regular hard-anodic coating 110 or with a low-friction coating 130 impregnated by a polymer such as PTFE, the latter of which provides a further benefit in fairway woods in that the club will have more protection and encounter less friction when sole plate 108 makes contact with the ground, increasing swing speed and club longevity. The hard-anodic sole plate 108 is also advantageous as applicable to drivers, especially when hitting off a standard plastic driving range mat, due to the reduced friction and extra protection provided by the PTFE-infused coating. This is further applicable to iron-type club heads (as shown in
As shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
In accordance with this embodiment, face insert 212 is attached to front 232 at cutout 230 so that the top surface of face insert 212 is flush with the surface of front 232. Preferably, the thickness of face insert 212 is substantially the same as the thickness of front 232. To retain face insert 212 to front 232, upper ledge 213 and feet 228 of face insert 212 rest on lower ledge 235 of stepped edge 234 and feet 228 are inserted into pocket 226. As shown in
To further secure face insert 212 to front 232, an adhesive or glue, such as 3M® Scotch-Weld® Epoxy Adhesive DP420, may be used to adhere upper ledge 213 of face insert 212 to lower ledge 235 of front 232. The addition of glue to the face insert-body portion subassembly not only enhances the attachment of said components, but also improves the sound and feel of the impact between club head and ball. Furthermore, the sound at impact can be controlled (hard vs. soft) by controlling the amount of glue used. It should be noted that during testing, a model club head made according to the present invention without the use of glue or adhesive was subjected to 3000 hits and produced no adverse feel or sound (rattling, looseness, etc.).
Golf club head 200 may further comprise top line insert 244, as shown in
In addition to top line insert 244, golf club head 200 may also include any one of or any combination of high density weight members 248A-C, disposed to back 246, as shown in
As in previous embodiments of the present invention, the club head comprises multiple metals to optimize its performance. Body portion 224 comprises a first metal having a first density, while face insert 212 comprises a second metal having a second density. According to this aspect of the present invention, the first metal preferably has a greater density than the second metal to keep the center of gravity downward and aftward. Body portion 224 preferably comprises a high-strength metal or metal alloy, such as stainless steel, titanium or titanium alloy. More preferably, body portion 224 comprises stainless steel 17-4. Face insert 212 preferably comprises a metal or metal alloy exhibiting both high-strength and low density, such as aluminum, aluminum alloys or aluminum metal matrix composites (MMCs), such as those described above. More preferably, face insert 212 comprises an aluminum metal matrix composite or MMC, known as the M9 MMC.
The use of M9 in face insert 212 provides for a strong and lightweight hitting surface. M9 is a member of the 7000 series aluminum alloys, and typically includes certain amounts of magnesium, zinc and copper, with a small percentage of scandium precipitated into the metal matrix. More specifically, M9 contains approximately 0.4 percent scandium, the addition of which improves characteristics such as the tensile strength, yield strength and hardness of the alloy. The scandium can be present in the range of about 0.2% to about 0.8%, preferably from about 0.3% to about 0.6%, and more preferably about 0.4%. An amount of zirconium less than but comparable to the amount of scandium is also precipitated into the M9 metal matrix composite. Approximate attributes of M9 are shown in the table below.
Compared to other aluminum alloys and MMCs, M9 has better strength and hardness. Moreover, M9 has a low density of about 2.85 g/cm3, making it much lighter than stainless steel, titanium and titanium alloys, and other high-strength metals. M9 reaches its peak strength after rolling and heat-treating. The following table illustrates a number of characteristics of M9 as compared to other aluminum alloys and MMCs.
In contrast to more dense metals typically used for body construction, face insert 212 comprising M9 is very light, allowing more weight to be apportioned to the back and side perimeters of body portion 224, a preferred method of weight distribution to optimize moment of inertia and center of gravity. The strength of the M9 material is similar to that of 431 stainless steel, but with much lower density. The M9 material also has better vibration absorption than forged iron. The table below shows strength and density characteristics of M9 as compared to other high-strength metals.
As discussed above, M9 is rolled and subjected to heat-treating to increase its strength and hardness. After the hardening process, the average grain size of the M9 MMC is decreased from about ten micrometers to between three and five micrometers. To further enhance strength and durability, face insert 212 may be anodized. Preferably, face insert 212 is anodized using the Type I process discussed in previous embodiments, as the chromic acid bath of the Type I process is able to produce an oxidization layer on the surface of parts with complex geometries, such as face insert 212. Body portion 224 may also be anodized, particularly if body portion 224 is composed of titanium or titanium alloy.
While it is apparent that the illustrative embodiments of the invention disclosed herein fulfill the objectives of the present invention, it is appreciated that numerous modifications and other embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. Additionally, feature(s) and/or element(s) from any embodiment may be used singly or in combination with other embodiment(s) and steps or elements from methods in accordance with the present invention can be executed or performed in any suitable order. Therefore, it will be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and embodiments, which would come within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/960,809, filed on Dec. 20, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/534,724, filed on Sep. 25, 2006, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 819900 | Martin | May 1906 | A |
| 3836153 | Dance, Jr. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3983014 | Newman et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4573685 | Young, IV et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4792140 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4884812 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 5303922 | Lo | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5358249 | Mendralla | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5405136 | Hardman | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5425535 | Gee | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5439712 | Hattori et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5489094 | Pritchett | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5509660 | Elmer | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5616088 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5669829 | Lin | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5713800 | Su | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720673 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5788584 | Parente et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807189 | Martin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5833551 | Vincent et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6030293 | Takeda | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6183381 | Grant et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200228 | Takeda | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6238302 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6410197 | Bellino et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6443853 | Bouquet | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6443854 | Calboreanu | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6488595 | Grace | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6648773 | Evans | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6679786 | McCabe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6739983 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6769998 | Clausen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6863625 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6893358 | Dewanjee et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6966846 | Bloom, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6971960 | Dewanjee et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986715 | Mahaffey | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7048648 | Breier et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7060176 | Rasmussen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7160204 | Huang | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7232380 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7261644 | Burrows | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7338387 | Nycum et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7364513 | Krumme | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7722479 | Soracco | May 2010 | B2 |
| D618743 | Roach | Jun 2010 | S |
| D618750 | Roberts | Jun 2010 | S |
| D618752 | Morris | Jun 2010 | S |
| 7803064 | Roach | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7803068 | Clausen | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| D624979 | Morris | Oct 2010 | S |
| 7811179 | Roach et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7811180 | Roach et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7819757 | Soracco | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20030207726 | Lee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20050164800 | Wood et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239576 | Stites et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025235 | Nakahara et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052184 | Soracco | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199661 | Deng et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070042836 | Best | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20080051220 | Soracco | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318705 | Clausen | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090118037 | Roach | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221382 | Soracco | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100041493 | Clausen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048318 | Clausen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100056297 | Roach | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069172 | Roach | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100151964 | Soracco | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261540 | Roach | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285899 | Soracco | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298065 | Soracco | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| AAC Web Forum: “Anodizing, What is it?”, www.anodizing.org/defintions.html. (downloaded Jun. 26, 2006). 11 pages. |
| Alpha Metal Finishing Co.: “About Anodizing”, www.alphametal.com/anodizing.htm. Copyright 2000-2002. Downloaded Sep. 30, 2006. 8 pages. |
| Danford, M.D.: “The Corrosion Protection of 6061-T6 Aluminum by a Polyurethane-Sealed Anodized Coat”, NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA TM—100394. Apr. 1990. |
| Duralectra: “Sanford Hardlube”, www.duralectra.com/af/sh.asp. Downloaded Jun. 30, 2006. |
| Engineers Edge: “Hard Anodizing Finish Specification”, www.engineersedge.com/mil—a—8625.htm Copyright 2000-2006. 1 page. |
| Furukawa-Sky Aluminum Corp.: “Coating and Surface Treatment”, www.furukawasky.co.jp/english/produce/en—coating.htm. Downloaded Jun. 26, 2006. 2 pages. |
| Tiodize Company: “Tiodize Process”, http://www.tiodize.com/tiodizeborchurepdf#search=%22titanium%20design%20consideration%20tiodize%20processes%22. Undated 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,608, filed Sep. 10, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/570,725, filed Sep. 30, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/643,154, filed Dec. 21, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/644,051, filed Dec. 22, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,955, filed Jan. 27, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/709,679, filed Feb. 22, 2010. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,377, filed Apr. 15, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110118057 A1 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11960809 | Dec 2007 | US |
| Child | 12902053 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11534724 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 11960809 | US |
