This application is a national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/045720, filed Aug. 8, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to filters, and more particularly, to a multi-mode bandpass filter with increased bandwidth capabilities.
Physical filters generally consist of a number of energy storing resonant structures with paths for energy to flow between these resonators and input/output ports. The physical implementation of the resonators and their respective interconnection will vary but the aforementioned principle applies equally such that these filters can be mathematically described in terms of a network of resonators coupled together.
In accordance with various embodiments, an improved multi-mode bandpass filter is provided having a through hole in each of the end slabs, and two triangular apertures at opposite corners of the slab-cube interface thereby providing for increased bandwidth capabilities.
In accordance with an embodiment, a multi-mode filter comprises resonator having a plurality of resonator bodies which are rectangular prisms (i.e., cuboids). The filter is configured with a through hole that electrically connects an input and an output to the center of a so-called “bullseye” coupling structure between a respective pair of slabs. Further, the multi-mode filter also has a plurality of coupling aperture segments which are coupling structures between each pair of resonator bodies or slabs. In accordance with the embodiment, two triangular apertures at opposite corners of at least two different slab-cube interfaces with such triangular apertures being diagonally opposed to one another across the respective interface. This facilitates a structure having an end-tapped dumbbell-shaped half-wavelength low-Q resonator, thereby considerably increasing the amount of external coupling available.
These and other advantages will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Some single-mode filters are typically formed from dielectric resonators having high-Q (low loss) characteristics which enable highly selective filters having a reduced size compared to cavity filters. Such single-mode filters tend to be constructed as a cascade of separated physical dielectric resonators with various couplings between them and their respective ports. Also, such single-mode filters may include a network of discrete resonators formed from ceramic material in a so-called “puck” shape, where each resonator has a single dominant resonance frequency or mode. These resonators are coupled together by providing openings between cavities in which the resonators are located. Typically, transmission poles or “zeros” are provided which can be tuned at particular frequencies to provide the desired filter response. A number of resonators will usually be required to achieve suitable filtering characteristics in commercial applications thereby resulting in relatively large size
Multi-mode filters typically implement several resonators in a single physical body such that filter size reduction can be achieved and the resulting filter can resonate in many different modes. As an example, a silvered dielectric body can resonate in many different modes such that each of these modes can act as one of the resonator in the filter. In order to provide for a practical multi-mode filter it is necessary to couple the energy between the modes within the single body. A typical manner in which such multi-mode filters are implemented is to selectively couple the energy from an input port to a first one of the modes. The energy stored in the first mode is then coupled to different modes within the resonator by introducing specific defects into the shape of the body. In this way, a multi-mode filter can be implemented as an effective cascade of resonators, in a similar fashion to conventional single mode filters. This multi-mode filter design further results in transmission poles which can be tuned to provide a desired filter response.
One compact radio-frequency (RF) filter, as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2015/0380799 A1, includes an a multi-mode filter made from silver plated resonator pieces (i.e., single mode slabs and triple-mode cubes) that are coupled together via apertures at the interfaces. This design differs from the aforementioned multi-mode filter designs in that the modes of the multi-mode structure are assumed to be coupled in parallel from input to output, with no coupling between the modes. In this way, defects are not needed in the shape of the body and allow this filter-type to use a perfect cuboid. Transmission zeros are formed by the amplitude and phase ratios of the parallel couplings into the modes, rather than by non-adjacent cross couplings across the resonators. Further, this filter solution provides for reducing the cooling demands on active antennas, supports space efficiency, power handling and efficiency, throughput and multi-band implementations. In this way, radio equipment vendors can deploy this filter design in efforts to deal with heat, output and multi-band capability challenges faced by the vendor's base station deployments in the field. Further, this filter design employs a blind depth hole to couple externally into a first and last slab of several slabs of the filter, while three square apertures couple a slab to a cube. The deeper the blind depth hole, the more the external coupling (while the larger the apertures) and the more the slab-to-cube coupling. However, the finite limit on the hole depth and the aperture size limits the maximum bandwidth achievable to approximately 5% fractional bandwidth (i.e., 90 MHz bandwidth at 1800 MHz center frequency, or 180 MHz bandwidth at 3600 MHz).
Therefore, an improved multi-mode bandpass filter with increased bandwidth capabilities is desirable.
In accordance with various embodiments, an improved multi-mode bandpass filter is provided having a through hole in respective end slabs, and two triangular apertures at opposite corners of the slab-cube interface thereby providing for increased bandwidth capabilities.
Resonator bodies 105-1, 105-2, 105-3, 105-4, and 105-5 are alternatively referred to herein as “slabs” and are respectively shown in
As will be appreciated, the number of modes which can be supported by multi-mode filter 100 is largely a function of the shape of each resonator body. Cuboid structures are particularly advantageous given they can be manufactured easily and relatively inexpensively and such structures can be easily fitted together by arranging, for example, multiple resonator bodies in contact, as further detailed below. Further, cuboid structures typically have clearly defined resonance modes thereby making configuration of the coupling aperture arrangement easier. Additionally, the use of a cuboid structure provides a planar surface, or a face, so that the apertures can be arranged in a plane parallel to such planar surface, with the apertures optionally being formed from an absence of metallization thereon. Thus, although cubic/cuboidal resonators are the primary focus herein thereby supporting up to three (i.e., simple, non-degenerate) modes in the case of a cube or cuboid, other shapes and numbers of modes are also possible in accordance with the principles disclosed herein.
As shown, multi-mode filter 100 also has a plurality of coupling aperture segments (i.e., aperture coupling segments 110-1, 110-2, 110-3, 110-4, 110-5 and 110-6, respectively) which are coupling structures between each pair of resonator bodies or slabs. The respective apertures are constituted by an absence of metallization (each resonator body is encapsulated in a metalized layer, not shown for clarity) with the remainder of the resonator body being substantially encapsulated in its metalized layer. For example, the coupling aperture segments 110-1 through 110-6 may be formed by etching, either chemically or mechanically, the metallization surrounding the respective resonator body to remove metallization and thereby form the coupling aperture segment(s). Alternatively, the coupling aperture segments could also be formed by other mechanisms, such as producing a mask in the shape of the respective aperture and temporarily attaching the mask to the specific location on the surface on the resonator body, spraying or otherwise depositing a conductive layer (i.e., a metallized layer) across substantially all of the surface area of the resonator body and then removing the mask from the resonator thereby leaving the desired aperture in the metallization.
As shown multi-mode filter 100 has through hole 125-1 which connects input 150 to the center of aperture segment 110-1 (also referred to herein as a “bullseye” coupling structure) between the pair of slabs S1 and S2. Similarly, through hole 125-2 connects output 140 to the center of aperture segment 110-6 (also referred to herein as a “bullseye” coupling structure) between the pair of slabs S5 and S4. In this configuration, the structure of resonator 120 can be described as a so-called end-tapped dumbbell-shaped half-wavelength low-Q resonator with a considerable increase in the amount of external coupling available.
As will be appreciated, in certain scenarios, a single resonator body cannot provide adequate performance (for example, in the attenuation of out-of-band signals). As such, the filter's overall performance can be improved by providing two or more resonator bodies arranged in series to facilitate increased filter performance such as the configuration in multi-mode filter 100. Consider, for example, a general case of arbitrary formed electric field (E-field) and magnetic field (H-field) that are typically present immediately outside a resonator body employing a single-mode resonator (e.g., resonator body 105-1/Slab S1, as described above) used on the input side as an illuminator to contain the fields to be coupled into a multi-mode resonator body (e.g., resonator body 105-3/Slab S3, as described above). As used herein, the term “illuminator” refers to any object, element, or the like which can contain or emit E-fields, H-fields or both types of such fields. That is, in the general case, consider the E-fields and H-fields existing in the single-mode resonator (e.g., resonator body 105-1/Slab S1, as described above) where such fields are to be coupled into the multi-mode resonator body (e.g., resonator body 105-3/Slab S3, as described above) via one or more arbitrarily-shaped coupling apertures. The shape of the multi-mode resonator will result in arbitrarily-shaped field orientations being required within the multi-mode resonator to excite the resonator modes (e.g., X, Y, and Z modes). As such, the field orientations of both the multi-mode resonator and the illuminator are important in determining the degree of coupling achieved together with the shape, size and orientation of the coupling apertures.
The illuminator contains one or more modes, each with its own field pattern as with the multi-mode resonator and the set of coupling apertures which also have a series of modes with their own field patterns. The coupling apertures from a given illuminator mode to a given aperture mode will be determined by the degree of overlay between the illuminator and aperture field patterns. Likewise, the coupling from a given coupling aperture mode to a given multi-mode resonator mode will be given by the overlap between the aperture and the multi-mode resonator field patterns. The coupling from a given illuminator mode to a given multi-mode resonator mode will therefore be the phasor sum of the couplings through all the aperture modes. The result of which is that the vector component of the H-field aligning with the aperture and then with the vector component of the resonator mode, along with the aperture size, determines the strength of the coupling. If all of the vectors align then strong coupling will generally occur, and likewise if there is misalignment then the degree of coupling is reduced. Further, in the case of the E-field, it is mainly the cross-sectional area of the aperture and its location on the face of the resonator which is important in determining the coupling strength. Thus, it is possible to control the degree of coupling to the various modes within the multi-mode resonator and, consequently, the pass-band and stop-band characteristics of the resulting filter.
That is, the aforementioned control of the degree of coupling may be obtained in each filter mode by controlling at least the length, width, position of the aperture arrangement and the angle thereof relative to the edges of the cuboid. In this way, in accordance with the embodiment shown in
Mathematically speaking, these pairs of triangular apertures are determined by subtracting a rotated rectangle from a larger rectangle that fills the interface, for example, interface 130 and/or interface 135.
As noted above, kp 220 and kn 225 collectively define the width of rectangle 205 from center 230 of the slab/cube interface (i.e., interface 130). As shown in the
In accordance with the embodiment, as shown in
Advantageously, in accordance with the embodiment, the modes of the multi-mode structure are assumed to be coupled in parallel from input to output, with no coupling between the modes. In this way, defects are not needed in the shape of the body and allow this filter-type to use a perfect cuboid. Transmission zeros are formed by the amplitude and phase ratios of the parallel couplings into the modes, rather than by non-adjacent cross couplings across the resonators.
As shown in
In accordance with the embodiment, the layout 400 minimizes insertion loss while maximizing isolation in the given footprint. That is, low pass filter 420 allows for minimizing insertion loss while maximizing isolation by having a high degree of pole zero flexibility. These “poles”, in accordance with the embodiment, are associated with and derived from the four in-band transmission resonators 425-1, 425-2, 425-3 and 425-4. In turn, the “zeros” are associated with and derived from the five reflection resonators 430-1, 430-2, 430-3, 430-3, 430-4 and 430-5. As will be appreciated, this configuration provides for a parameterized degrees of freedom (i.e., track widths and lengths) such that, using optimization, the four poles can be positioned to maximize the bandwidth of low pass filter 420 (i.e., minimize insertion loss) while the zeros can be positioned to maximize attenuation only, as needed.
Multi-mode filter 405 also comprises a plurality of coupling aperture segments (i.e., aperture coupling segments 535-1, 535-2, 535-3, 535-4, and 535-5, respectively) which are coupling structures between each pair of resonator bodies or slabs, as detail above. In the configuration shown in
The foregoing Detailed Description is to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the disclosure herein is not to be determined from the Detailed Description, but rather from the claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. It is to be understood that the embodiments shown and described herein are only illustrative of the principles of the present disclosure and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit thereof. Those skilled in the art could implement various other feature combinations without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/045720 | 8/8/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/032939 | 2/13/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9406988 | Hendry et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437910 | Hendry et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9614264 | Hendry et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9698455 | Hendry et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20090146761 | Nummerdor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20150380799 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380800 | Cooper | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006104 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160094265 | Yuan | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202601816 | Dec 2012 | CN |
104752794 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104995786 | Oct 2015 | CN |
2017000259 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2021, in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 2018800964621.4, 17 pgs (including translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 16, 2019, in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/045720, filed Aug. 8, 2018, 17 pgs. |
Hendry et al., “Triple-Mode Ceramic Cavity Filters with Wide Spurious-Free Performance,” 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 65, No. 10, pp. 3780-3788. |
Kelleci et al., “An Analytical Approach to the Design of Multiple Mode Rectangular Cavity Waveguide Filters,” 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 2857-2865. |
Yahia et al., “Complex Rectangular Filter Design using Hybrid Finite Element Method and Modified Multimodal Variational Formulation,” 2013, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 44, pp. 55-66. |
Liu et al., “Ultra-Compact Highly Selective Quasi-Elliptic Filters Based on Combining Dual-Mode SIW and Coplanar Waveguides in a Single Cavity,” 2018, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 360-366. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210194108 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |