Skiing injuries occur when excessive forces beyond human tolerance are transmitted to the skier from the ski. Due to the high-speed nature of the sport, substantial energy is developed by a skier in motion on a steep slope. Ski bindings prevent ski injuries by releasing the skier's leg from rigid communication with the ski when forces deemed to be injurious are applied to the ski, as in a ski fall. Skiers wear specially engageable boots that are adapted to engage a binding attached to the ski, and maintain the boot and thus, the skier's calf and foot, in tight coupling with the ski. Forces transmitted to the legs through the binding system can be injurious, particularly during tight turns, falls, and high-speed maneuvers. Ski bindings are therefore designed to selectively release a skier from the skis by decoupling a ski boot when a predetermined force is achieved. Conventional approaches employ a pivoting toe that pivots the boot from a parallel alignment to the ski to an outward position allowing the boot to freely disengage, such that harmful rotation of the leg relative to the ski is avoided.
A ski binding reduces a likelihood of injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the tibia is accomplished by absorption in the binding to limit the loads that are transmitted into the leg through the boot-binding interface. A ski binding device for engaging a ski boot heel or toe for release based on a control threshold includes a binding response tower attached to the ski and adapted for selective engagement with the ski, such that the binding response tower permits biased vertical and lateral horizontal displacement of the boot heel and toe with respect to the ski, prior to a release threshold. The binding response tower is in communication with the boot heel and toe and is adapted for slideable engagement in response to vertical and lateral forces exerted from the boot. The binding response tower is adapted to disengage, or release upon reaching at least one a predetermined lateral displacement or a predetermined vertical displacement, such as when the boot heel is forced sufficiently sideways or upwards due to skier movement that would tend to cause an ACL injury.
A containment housing has a biasing force counter to the force from the boot, such the response tower is operable to displace against the biasing counterforce relative to the force from the boot heel, for allowing substantially fixed coupling between the boot and the ski during normal skiing conditions. The biasing counterforce may result from any suitable mechanical or fluidic driven force using at least one of coil springs, pneumatics, hydraulics, cantilever beam springs and cam-spring systems for achieving force displacement behavior. In particular configurations, constant force springs provide a leveling of the force curve to enhance controlled boot displacement.
Configurations herein are based, in part, on the observation that ski bindings and attempt to strike a delicate balance between an inadvertent release and injurious binding retention when a skier's boot remains engaged despite a fall. Often, a threshold force is defined that attempts to differentiate between normal, or “performance” forces and injurious forces. The latter should trigger binding release; the former, retention. Unfortunately, conventional approaches suffer from the shortcoming of unintentional release and over-retention. An international standard purports to define a binding tension setting (din setting) for optimal release. However, high intensity ski competitions, such as the Olympics, demonstrate unfinished runs due to either unintended release or injuries from over-retention. Accordingly, configurations herein substantially overcome the shortcomings of inaccurate release thresholds by defining a multimodal binding that allows for independent vertical and lateral displacement-based force absorption within the performance threshold, i.e. before binding release. Spring biased horizontal and vertical displacement assemblies provide for constant force-biased displacement which permits a controlled level of either force or displacement to determine normal operation. Within this control threshold of force and displacement, the biased members permit skier correction. Control is regained by absorbing forces through displacement before transmitting them to the release mechanism. Only upon attaining a predetermined level of displacement against a constant force spring does binding release occur.
In particular, connected vertical and lateral displacement assemblies allow for forces in either dimension, or a combination, to trigger release. This is particularly effective against Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries. Unlike conventional release patterns, which typically target planar toe rotation and toe binding lateral rotation or pivoting, ACL injuries result from twisting forces to the knee region. In particular combined valgus inward rotation (CVIR) and boot induced anterior drawer (BIAD) involve heel movements and forces.
In further detail, the ski binding device, as disclosed herein includes a vertical displacement assembly coupled between a ski interface and a boot interface, and a lateral displacement assembly coupled between the vertical force assembly and the ski interface. The displacement assemblies operate concurrently and simultaneously for respective dimensions, such that opposed force biasing members disposed in the lateral displacement assembly exert counterforce against lateral forces, and opposed force biasing members disposed in the vertical displacement assembly exert counterforce against vertical forces. The boot interface is adapted to transmit force to the vertical and lateral assemblies for receiving the exerted counterforce based on ski movement transmitted via the ski interface.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Configurations below depict an example heel and toe binding including a displacement absorption approach as disclosed above. A displacement assembly as discussed below is operable in conjunction with a conventional binding exhibiting static release thresholds using conventional springs. While any suitable biasing member (e.g spring, hydraulic, resilient material) may be employed, a constant force spring allows greater displacement, and thus greater recovery potential, while the skier is operating within the control threshold, before injurious forces are attained.
The load limiting and absorptive ski binding approach disclosed herein further includes a release mechanism adapted to disengage the boot from the boot interface upon the vertical or lateral forces reaching a predetermined injury threshold. The release mechanism receives ski forces once the displacement assemblies 110, 120 are at the extreme travel (displacement) positions as in
A performance curve 310 shows binding retention and absorption during a high intensity, forceful ski run. A recovery curve 320 shows how forces might be handled in a near fall situation. A control threshold 305 defines the force required to begin displacement in the displacement assembly 110, 120. For forces below this threshold, the displacement assembly holds the boot in rigid, fixed engagement. A release threshold 307 defines force which will cause release. Between is a control range where the displacement assemblies permit biased movement of the boot relative to the binding. Similarly, displacement beyond the displacement threshold 330 will trigger release, 332 due to displacement, even if the load may be below the release threshold 307.
During displacement assembly operation, displacement is defined by work resulting from movement in the displacement assembly against the counter force. This may be a constant force spring or other force exertion in the displacement assembly, disclosed further below. In the performance curve 310 scenario, a skier is exerting continued force against the binding in segment 311, such as a tight turn on a steep slope. Upon crossing the control threshold 305, the displacement assemblies 110, 120 allow displacement, such as the heel sliding out or raising up. The spring in the displacement assembly exerts a constant counterforce, shown by the substantially horizontal segment 313, as displacement increases below the release threshold. Upon attaining the displacement threshold 330, the binding releases.
In recovery scenario 320, a moderate turn is executed at segment 321, and forces increase. Upon attaining the control threshold 305, the displacement assembly mitigates the force, as the slope in segment 323 is less steep. During this segment, relaxation of the force will allow the displacement to subside as the displacement assembly spring biases back. This represents force absorption via displacement, as when a skier is taking a sharp turn, but shortly resumes travel in a straight direction. If not, and displacement increases, release 332 occurs.
For resistance to snow, ice and mud that often accompany a ski environment, the moveable slide 152 and interface with force biasing members 150 is enclosed in a cavity 160 adapted from incursion of contamination. A cover 172 encloses the cavity 160. In the cavity 160, the moveable slide 152 includes a rest position defined by an unbiased position between equally displaced force biasing members 150, defining a rest position representing a stationary or static movement (i.e. no turns or acceleration/deceleration). Depending on the size of the cavity 160, the force biasing members 150 have a predetermined counterforce and a maximum displacement in the cavity, following which forces are directly transferred from the ski to the boot, as in an extreme turn or fall, possibly leading to release if the injury threshold is reached.
In
While the system and methods defined herein have been particularly shown and described with references to embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/485,151, filed Apr. 13, 2017, entitled “SKI BINDING RELEASE,” incorporated herein by reference in entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2706606 | Allen | Apr 1955 | A |
2912212 | Lowe | Nov 1959 | A |
2924419 | Wells | Feb 1960 | A |
3228708 | Miller | Jan 1966 | A |
3794338 | Smolka | Feb 1974 | A |
3897075 | Cutter | Jul 1975 | A |
3921994 | Locati | Nov 1975 | A |
4165887 | Bunn, Jr. | Aug 1979 | A |
4294460 | Kirsch | Oct 1981 | A |
4316618 | Sampson | Feb 1982 | A |
4401317 | Horiuchi | Aug 1983 | A |
4408744 | Thompson | Oct 1983 | A |
4565386 | Crainich | Jan 1986 | A |
4596373 | Omi | Jun 1986 | A |
4629208 | Gertsch | Dec 1986 | A |
4902031 | Bogner | Feb 1990 | A |
4974867 | Rullier | Dec 1990 | A |
5135250 | Abondance | Aug 1992 | A |
5207448 | Bonvallet | May 1993 | A |
5566968 | Challande | Oct 1996 | A |
5669594 | Platus | Sep 1997 | A |
5775716 | Harsanyi | Jul 1998 | A |
5775717 | Bobrowicz | Jul 1998 | A |
5820154 | Howe | Oct 1998 | A |
6065763 | Adams, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6158747 | Magnani | Dec 2000 | A |
6648362 | Bunter | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6789806 | Santa Cruz | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6863283 | Houston | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7134680 | Emig | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7296805 | Lindemann | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7494134 | Mann | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7758062 | Klubitschko | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8746729 | Convert | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9033359 | Favret | May 2015 | B2 |
9089763 | Brown | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9339719 | Brown | May 2016 | B2 |
9358447 | Brown | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9394967 | Tu | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9463370 | Howell | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9538809 | Park | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9829063 | Cho | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9950242 | Wilson | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9981178 | Huynh | May 2018 | B1 |
10232221 | Grayston | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10537156 | Thappeta | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10718399 | Martin Hernandez | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20150375087 | Howell | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20200222787 | Nichols | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20220023743 | Brown | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2538931 | Sep 2006 | CA |
2607881 | Sep 1977 | DE |
2747084 | Apr 1979 | DE |
9413207 | Dec 1994 | DE |
102005004267 | Aug 2006 | DE |
0178375 | Apr 1985 | EP |
2643275 | Aug 1990 | FR |
WO-2009033307 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2015089263 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Work By Integration”; https://www.rit.edu/studentaffairs/asc/sites/rit.edu.studentaffairs.asc/files/docs/Work%20by%20Itegration_Summer2017.pdf; 2017. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2018/027456, pp. 2, dated Aug. 23, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180296902 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62485151 | Apr 2017 | US |