Multi-operand floating point operations in a programmable integrated circuit device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8412756
  • Patent Number
    8,412,756
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 11, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A programmable logic device is programmed to add a plurality N of unnormalized numbers at once. Because the inputs are not normalized, they could all have different exponents. The largest exponent of the N exponents is found, and for each of the inputs, its mantissa is right-shifted at by the difference between the largest exponent and the exponent of that particular input. The N shifted mantissas are combined, optionally with sign data, in an (N+1):2 compressor to provide carry and save vectors which may be combined in a carry-propagate adder. Numbers may converted back to normalized form at the end of the operation. If necessary to avoid data loss, a number may be normalized after an intermediate step.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to performing floating point arithmetic operations in programmable integrated circuit devices, such as programmable logic devices (PLDs).


As applications for which programmable devices are used increase in complexity, it has become more common to design programmable devices to include specialized processing blocks in addition to blocks of generic programmable logic resources. Such specialized processing blocks may include a concentration of circuitry on a programmable device that has been partly or fully hardwired to perform one or more specific tasks, such as a logical or a mathematical operation. A specialized processing block may also contain one or more specialized structures, such as an array of configurable memory elements. Examples of structures that are commonly implemented in such specialized processing blocks include: multipliers, arithmetic logic units (ALUs), barrel-shifters, various memory elements (such as FIFO/LIFO/SIPO/RAM/ROM/CAM blocks and register files), AND/NAND/OR/NOR arrays, etc., or combinations thereof.


One particularly useful type of specialized processing block that has been provided on programmable devices is a digital signal processing (DSP) block, which may be used to process, e.g., audio signals. Such blocks are frequently also referred to as multiply-accumulate (“MAC”) blocks, because they include structures to perform multiplication operations, and sums and/or accumulations of multiplication operations.


For example, PLDs sold by Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif., under the family name STRATIX® include DSP blocks, each of which includes a plurality of multipliers (e.g., 18-by-18 multipliers). Each of those DSP blocks also includes adders and registers, as well as programmable connectors (e.g., multiplexers) that allow the various components to be configured in different ways. In each such block, the multipliers can be configured not only as individual multipliers, but also as smaller multipliers (by leaving some inputs unused or zeroed), or as one larger multiplier. In addition, complex multiplication (which decomposes into two multiplication operations for each of the real and imaginary parts) can be performed.


The arithmetic operations to be performed by a PLD frequently are floating point operations. The IEEE754-1985 standard requires that in floating point operations, values be normalized at all times because it implies a leading “1”.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to circuitry that carries out floating point operations on multiple operands without normalization, although the results may be normalized if IEEE754-1985 compliance is required. In addition, normalization may be performed in intermediate steps if loss of data might otherwise result. The circuitry can be provided in a fixed logic device, or can be configured into a programmable integrated circuit device such as a programmable logic device (PLD).


In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device to perform floating point addition operations on a plurality of numbers, where each of the numbers is represented by a respective mantissa and a respective exponent. The method includes configuring logic of the programmable integrated circuit device to determine a largest exponent of the respective exponent of the plurality of numbers, and to subtract each respective exponent from the largest exponent to determine a respective shifting amount, and to select the largest exponent as a resultant exponent. Logic of the programmable integrated circuit device also is configured to shift each respective mantissa of the plurality of numbers by the respective shifting amount. A compressor is configured in the programmable integrated circuit device to simultaneously combine the plurality of shifted mantissas into a carry vector and a save vector. A carry-propagate adder is configured in the programmable integrated circuit device to combine the carry vector and the save vector.


A programmable logic device so configured, a machine-readable data storage medium encoded with software for performing the method, and logic circuitry to perform floating point addition operations on a plurality of numbers, are also provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows logical architecture for an embodiment of a multi-input floating point adder according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a portion of binary sort logic used in an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of normalization as performed in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an alternate arrangement of a portion of the normalization operation represented by FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a magnetic data storage medium encoded with a set of machine-executable instructions for performing the method according to the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an optically readable data storage medium encoded with a set of machine-executable instructions for performing the method according to the present invention; and



FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of an illustrative system employing a programmable logic device incorporating the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Floating point numbers are commonplace for representing real numbers in scientific notation in computing systems. Examples of real numbers in scientific notation are:

    • 3.1415926510×10° (π)
    • 2.71828182810×10° (e)
    • 0.00000000110 or 1.010×10−9 (seconds in a nanosecond)
    • 315576000010 or 3.1557610×109 (seconds in a century)


The first two examples are real numbers in the range of the lower integers, the third example represents a very small fraction, and the fourth example represents a very large integer. Floating point numbers in computing systems are designed to cover the large numeric range and diverse precision requirements shown in these examples. Fixed point number systems have a very limited window of representation which prevents them from representing very large or very small numbers simultaneously. The position of the notional binary-point in fixed point numbers addresses this numeric range problem to a certain extent but does so at the expense of precision. With a floating point number the window of representation can move, which allows the appropriate amount of precision for the scale of the number.


Floating point representation is generally preferred over fixed point representation in computing systems because it permits an ideal balance of numeric range and precision. However, floating point representation requires more complex implementation compared to fixed point representation.


The IEEE754-1985 standard is commonly used for floating point numbers. A floating point number includes three different parts: the sign of the number, its mantissa and its exponent. Each of these parts may be represented by a binary number and, in the IEEE754-1985 format, have the following bit sizes:

















Sign
Exponent
Bias
Mantissa







Single
1 bit
 8 bits
 −127
23 bits


Precision
[31]
[30 . . . 23]

[22 . . . 00]


32-Bit






Double
1 bit
11 bits
−1023
52 bits


Precision
[63]
[62 . . . 52]

[51 . . . 0] 


64-Bit









The exponent preferably is an unsigned binary number which, for the single precision format, ranges from 0 to 255. In order to represent a very small number, it is necessary to use negative exponents. To achieve this the exponent preferably has a negative bias associated with it. For single-precision numbers, the bias preferably is −127. For example a value of 140 for the exponent actually represents (140−127)=13, and a value of 100 represents (100−127)=−27. For double precision numbers, the exponent bias preferably is −1023.


As discussed above, according to the standard, the mantissa is a normalized number—i.e., it has no leading zeroes and represents the precision component of a floating point number. Because the mantissa is stored in binary format, the leading bit can either be a 0 or a 1, but for a normalized number it will always be a 1. Therefore, in a system where numbers are always normalized, the leading bit need not be stored and can be implied, effectively giving the mantissa one extra bit of precision. Therefore, in single precision format, the mantissa typically includes 24 bits of precision.


However, the IEEE754-1985 standard requires continuous normalization—i.e., normalization after every step of a multistep computation—to maintain the leading “1” to preserve accuracy. This is expensive in terms of programmable resources, as each normalization operation requires two steps—(1) finding the position of the “1”, and (2) shifting the fractional part to get a leading “1” (which is then eliminated, because it is implied).


In accordance with copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/625,655, filed Jan. 22, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, there is no implied leading “1”, so that normalization is not required. Although this requires that one bit of precision be given up, because all bits must be kept, rather than implied, this greatly reduces the required logic, particularly shifting logic, and therefore the latency of the floating point operations. Moreover, in a programmable device that already has dedicated arithmetic circuits, such as multipliers and/or adders, that are capable of handling the extra bits, there is no additional cost in terms of logic resources to handle those extra bits.


Specifically, according to above-incorporated application Ser. No. 11/625,655, to configure a programmable device to perform floating point operations, the programmable device preferably is configured so that floating point values in accordance with a first format, such as the IEEE754-1985 standard format, preferably are converted to an internal format for calculation purposes, and are reconverted to the standard format upon completion of the operations.


Whereas the IEEE754-1985 standard format includes a 24-bit unsigned mantissa (23 bits plus the implied “1”) and an 8-bit exponent, the internal format preferably includes a 32-bit signed mantissa and a 10-bit exponent. When converting from the standard 24-bit format to the 32-bit format of the invention, the implied leading “1” of the mantissa is made explicit and preferably is initially positioned at the 28th bit location. This leaves the four most significant bits of the 32-bit number available for overflows as operations progress. For example, 16 additions could be performed before any overflow would consume all four bits. Similarly, because the original standard representation is only 24 bits wide, the four least significant bits also are available for any underflows that may occur.


As stated above, preferably, and ordinarily, during floating point operations the operands remain in the internal format, and are converted back to their original format only upon completion of operations. Because of the initial presence of the leading and trailing bits, as well as the larger exponent size, during operations it is possible to continue beyond conditions that might have led to overflows or underflows in the original format, because of the possibility that the accumulation of further results may reverse the overflow or underflow condition.


However, if during operation the accumulation of underflows or overflows reaches the point that information may be lost—e.g., there would be an overflow if the data were converted back to the standard format, or an underflow would be approached such that fewer than three significant bits beyond the required mantissa precision (i.e., in this example, fewer than 1+23+3=27 bits) would remain—it may be desirable to normalize the data at an intermediate step to prevent lost of precision. In such a case, subsequent operations preferably would not include further normalization until the final result is achieved (unless a condition again arises in which data may be lost).


Although the arrangement described in above-incorporated application Ser. No. 11/625,655 achieves savings in device area, as well as number of operations performed, it nevertheless operates on only two operands at a time. For example, to add four numbers a, b, c, d, together, a and b might be added in one operation, with c and d being added in a separate operation, and then the two intermediate sums are added. To add eight numbers, the tree would have a third level, with four individual additions of two addends each in the first level, two additions of two addends each in the second level, and a final addition of two addends in the third level. This is expensive in terms of both resources and latency.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, a plurality N of unnormalized numbers can be added at once, as shown in FIG. 1. Because the inputs are not normalized, they could all have different exponents. The largest exponent of the N exponents 101 is found by module 200 as described in connection with FIG. 2, and for each of the inputs, its mantissa 102 is right-shifted by one of shifters 103 by the difference 104 between the largest exponent 105 and the exponent 101 of that particular input (note that this holds even for the input with the largest exponent, except that the shift will be zero bits). The N shifted mantissas are combined, optionally with sign data, in an (N+1):2 compressor 106 to provide carry and save vectors 107, 108 which may be added in a carry-propagate adder 109 to provide output mantissa 110.


The (N+1)th input 111 to compressor 106 represents the sign. If the addends are being represented in IEEE754-1985 format (except for not being normalized), then each will have a separate sign bit. In that case, the (N+1)th input 111 is a number representing how many of the inputs have a sign bit indicating a negative number. This may be thought of as a unary (1°) to binary (2°) conversion, but also may be considered to be a “count-leading-ones” module. In addition, each of the mantissas would be XORed at 112 with its sign bit to create a one's-complement equivalent representation. If any subtractions are involved, then the sign bit associated with any minuend is inverted before the unary-to-binary conversion and before the one's-complement conversion.


If signed numbers (where the most significant bit indicates the sign) are used instead of unsigned numbers with separate sign bits, and all of the operations are additions, then the mantissas are used directly, and the (N+1)th input 111, as well as XOR-gates 112, can be omitted. If some of the operations may be subtractions, the signed number inputs 111, 112 would be used but would be determined by the subtraction controls. But if the presence of subtractions is fixed for a particular user logic design, then the necessary inversions can be fixed when the user logic design is compiled, and inputs 111, 112 again could be omitted.


One embodiment of exponent sorting module 200 may use a binary sorting tree to find the largest exponent. The exponents 101 may be paired off arbitrarily. For each pair, the larger of the two exponents 201, 202 may be found as shown in FIG. 2. As seen there, exponents 201, 202 are input as signed numbers to subtractor 203, as well as to the 0th and 1th inputs, respectively, of multiplexer 204. Exponent 202 is subtracted from exponent 201. The most significant bit (MSB) of the difference 205 controls multiplexer 204. Thus, if exponent 201 is larger, difference 205 is positive, so its MSB is a 0 and multiplexer 204 selects exponent 201. If exponent 202 is larger, difference 205 is negative, so its MSB is a 1 and multiplexer 204 selects exponent 202. The results are passed to the next level of tree 200. If any level has an odd number of inputs, one input simply gets a bye to the following level. The number of levels required to sort N exponents 101 is ceil(log 2(N)).


As compared to a tree of carry-propagate adders, the structure 100 of FIG. 1 is about the same size, in terms of device area. Although compressor 106 may be larger than the equivalent number of adders, the absence of pipeline registers between adder levels makes the difference negligible. However, even though it does not present an advantage in device area, structure 100 presents a latency advantage. For example, in the case of eight inputs, the latency would be about one-half of the latency using the technique of above-incorporated application Ser. No. 11/625,655.


Normalization may be required at the end of a calculation, if an IEEE754-1985-compliant output is required. In addition, if data will be lost because an overflow or underflow will occur, then intermediate normalization may take place. Whether at the end of the calculation, or at an intermediate step, normalization may be performed, for example, by circuitry 300 such as that shown in FIG. 3.


The absolute value of denormalized mantissa 301 is determined at 302. A count-leading-zeroes module 303 may determine, by counting leading zeroes, how many bits of shifting are required to renormalize output 301. The number so determined may be used in left shifter 305 to adjust pipelined mantissa 301 and at subtractor 306 to adjust pipelined exponent 304. The normalized mantissa 310 and exponent 311 are adjusted as necessary by rounding stage 307 as is well known (e.g., from the IEEE754-1985 specification), to provide a resultant mantissa 320 and a resultant exponent 321.


If signed numbers are being used, then for normalization, arrangement 400 of FIG. 4 may be substituted in FIG. 3 for count-leading-zeroes module 303. Arrangement 400 includes a count-leading-zeroes module 403, as well as a count-leading-ones module 401. If a number is positive, then it will have some number of leading zeroes, the first of which is the sign bit. Count-leading-zeroes module 403 will determine how many leading zeroes there are, and that number, output at 405, will be used in left shifter 305 to normalize the number. If a number is negative, then it will have some number of leading ones, the first of which is the sign bit. Count-leading-ones module 401 will determine how many leading ones there are, and that number, output at 405, will be used in left shifter 305 to normalize the number. Whether the output of count-leading-ones module 401 or count-leading-zeroes module 403 is used is determined by a multiplexer 402 whose control input is the most significant bit of the input number 404. Whichever of count-leading-ones module 401 or count-leading-zeroes module 403 is not selected by multiplexer 402 may have a completely erroneous output, but it will be ignored.


One potential use for the present invention may be in programmable integrated circuit devices such as programmable logic devices, where programming software can be provided to allow users to configure a programmable device to perform multi-input floating point addition and subtraction (subtraction is the same as addition, with an adjustment the sign of the minuend). The result would be that fewer logic resources of the programmable device would be consumed. And where the programmable device is provided with a certain number of dedicated blocks for arithmetic functions (to spare the user from having to configure arithmetic functions from general-purpose logic), the number of dedicated blocks needed to be provided (which may be provided at the expense of additional general-purpose logic) can be reduced (or sufficient dedicated blocks for more operations, without further reducing the amount of general-purpose logic, can be provided).


Instructions for carrying out the method according to this invention may be encoded on a machine-readable medium, to be executed by a suitable computer or similar device to implement the method of the invention for programming or configuring PLDs to perform arithmetic operations in accordance with the format describe above. For example, a personal computer may be equipped with an interface to which a PLD can be connected, and the personal computer can be used by a user to program the PLD using a suitable software tool, such as the QUARTUS® II software available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif.



FIG. 5 presents a cross section of a magnetic data storage medium 600 which can be encoded with a machine-executable program that can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 600 can be a floppy diskette or hard disk, or magnetic tape, having a suitable substrate 601, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 602, which may be conventional, on one or both sides, containing magnetic domains (not visible) whose polarity or orientation can be altered magnetically. Except in the case where it is magnetic tape, medium 600 may also have an opening (not shown) for receiving the spindle of a disk drive or other data storage device.


The magnetic domains of coating 602 of medium 600 are polarized or oriented so as to encode, in manner which may be conventional, a machine-executable program, for execution by a programming system such as a personal computer or other computer or similar system, having a socket or peripheral attachment into which the PLD to be programmed may be inserted, to configure appropriate portions of the PLD, including its specialized processing blocks, if any, in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 6 shows a cross section of an optically-readable data storage medium 700 which also can be encoded with such a machine-executable program, which can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 700 can be a conventional compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM) or digital video disk read only memory (DVD-ROM) or a rewriteable medium such as a CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, or DVD-RAM or a magneto-optical disk which is optically readable and magneto-optically rewriteable. Medium 700 preferably has a suitable substrate 701, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 702, which may be conventional, usually on one or both sides of substrate 701.


In the case of a CD-based or DVD-based medium, as is well known, coating 702 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 703, arranged on one or more layers, to encode the machine-executable program. The arrangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 702. A protective coating 704, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 702.


In the case of magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 702 has no pits 703, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 702. The arrangement of the domains encodes the program as described above.


Thus it is seen that a method for carrying out floating point operations, a PLD programmed to perform the method, and software for carrying out the programming, have been provided.


A PLD 90 programmed according to the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in a data processing system 900 shown in FIG. 7. Data processing system 900 may include one or more of the following components: a processor 901; memory 902; I/O circuitry 903; and peripheral devices 904. These components are coupled together by a system bus 905 and are populated on a circuit board 906 which is contained in an end-user system 907.


System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 90 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 90 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.


Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 90 as described above and incorporating this invention.


It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device to perform floating point addition operations on more than two numbers, each of said numbers being represented by a respective mantissa and a respective exponent, said method comprising: configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine a largest exponent of said respective exponent of said more than two numbers, and to subtract each respective said exponent from said largest exponent to determine a respective shifting amount, and to select said largest exponent as a resultant exponent;configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to shift each respective mantissa of said more than two numbers by said respective shifting amount;configuring a compressor in said programmable integrated circuit device to simultaneously combine said more than two shifted mantissas into a carry vector and a save vector; andconfiguring a carry-propagate adder in said programmable integrated circuit device to combine said carry vector and said save vector.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein: said configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine a largest exponent comprises configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to perform a binary sort.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein: configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount comprises configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine said left-shift amount by counting leading zeroes in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents an unsigned number or a positive signed number, and by counting leading ones in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents a negative signed number.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 further comprising configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to round said normalized resultant mantissa and said reduced resultant exponent to produce a final mantissa and a final exponent.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are unsigned numbers having mantissas and separate sign bits; said method further comprising:configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to count each of said numbers having a sign bit equal to 1, representing a negative addend or a subtraction, for input to said compressor;configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to invert said mantissas of any negative addend, and any minuend in any subtraction operation, for input to said compressor.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are signed numbers having sign bits as part of their mantissas; said method further comprising:configuring logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to count subtraction control bits associated with said numbers for input to said compressor.
  • 8. A programmable integrated circuit device configurable to perform floating point addition operations on more than two numbers, each of said numbers being represented by a respective mantissa and a respective exponent, said programmable integrated circuit device comprising: programmable logic configurable to determine a largest exponent of said respective exponent of said more than two numbers, and to subtract each respective said exponent from said largest exponent to determine a respective shifting amount, and to select said largest exponent as a resultant exponent;programmable logic configurable to shift each respective mantissa of said plurality of numbers by said respective shifting amount;programmable logic configurable as a compressor to simultaneously combine said plurality of shifted mantissas into a carry vector and a save vector; andprogrammable logic configurable to combine said carry vector and said save vector.
  • 9. The device of claim 8 wherein said programmable logic configurable to combine said carry vector and said save vector comprises a fixed carry-propagate adder.
  • 10. The device of claim 8 wherein said programmable logic configurable to combine said carry vector and said save vector comprises logic configurable as a carry-propagate adder.
  • 11. The device of claim 8 wherein said programmable logic configurable to determine a largest exponent comprises programmable logic configurable to perform a binary sort.
  • 12. The device of claim 8 further comprising programmable logic configurable to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount.
  • 13. The device of claim 12 wherein said logic configurable to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount comprises logic configurable to determine said left-shift amount by counting leading zeroes in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents an unsigned number or a positive signed number, and by counting leading ones in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents a negative signed number.
  • 14. The device of claim 12 further comprising logic configurable to round said normalized resultant mantissa and said reduced resultant exponent to produce a final mantissa and a final exponent.
  • 15. The device of claim 8 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are unsigned numbers having mantissas and separate sign bits; said device further comprising:logic configured to count each of said numbers having a sign bit equal to 1, representing a negative addend or a subtraction, for input to said compressor;logic configured to invert said mantissas of any negative addend, and any minuend in any subtraction operation, for input to said compressor.
  • 16. The device of claim 8 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are signed numbers having sign bits as part of their mantissas; said device further comprising:logic configured to count subtraction control bits associated with said numbers for input to said compressor.
  • 17. A non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium encoded with machine-executable instructions for configuring a programmable integrated circuit device to perform floating point addition operations on a more than two numbers, each of said numbers being represented by a respective mantissa and a respective exponent, said instructions comprising: instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine a largest exponent of said respective exponent of said more than two numbers, and to subtract each respective said exponent from said largest exponent to determine a respective shifting amount, and to select said largest exponent as a resultant exponent;instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to shift each respective mantissa of said more than two numbers by said respective shifting amount;instructions to configure a compressor in said programmable integrated circuit device to simultaneously combine said more than two shifted mantissas into a carry vector and a save vector; andinstructions to configure a carry-propagate adder in said programmable integrated circuit device to combine said carry vector and said save vector.
  • 18. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 17 wherein said instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine a largest exponent comprise instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to perform a binary sort.
  • 19. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 17 wherein said instructions further comprise instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount.
  • 20. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 19 wherein said instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount comprise instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to determine said left-shift amount by counting leading zeroes in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents an unsigned number or a positive signed number, and by counting leading ones in said resultant mantissa when said resultant mantissa represents a negative signed number.
  • 21. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 19 wherein said instructions further comprise instructions to configure logic of said programmable integrated circuit device to round said normalized resultant mantissa and said reduced resultant exponent to produce a final mantissa and a final exponent.
  • 22. Circuitry for performing floating point addition operations on more than two numbers, each of said numbers being represented by a respective mantissa and a respective exponent, said circuitry comprising: logic to determine a largest exponent of said respective exponent of said more than two numbers, and to subtract each respective said exponent from said largest exponent to determine a respective shifting amount, and to select said largest exponent as a resultant exponent;logic to shift each respective mantissa of said more than two numbers by said respective shifting amount;a compressor to simultaneously combine said more than two shifted mantissas into a carry vector and a save vector; andlogic to combine said carry vector and said save vector.
  • 23. The circuitry of claim 22 wherein said logic to combine said carry vector and said save vector comprises a carry-propagate adder.
  • 24. The circuitry of claim 22 wherein said logic to determine a largest exponent comprises binary sort logic.
  • 25. The circuitry of claim 22 further comprising logic to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount.
  • 26. The circuitry of claim 25 wherein said logic to normalize said resultant mantissa by a left-shift amount and to reduce said resultant exponent by said left-shift amount comprises count-leading-zeroes logic to count leading zeroes in said resultant mantissa to determine said left-shift amount when said resultant mantissa represents an unsigned number or a positive signed number, and count-leading-ones logic to count leading ones in said resultant mantissa to determine said left-shift amount when said resultant mantissa represents a negative signed number.
  • 27. The circuitry of claim 25 further comprising logic to round said normalized resultant mantissa and said reduced resultant exponent to produce a final mantissa and a final exponent.
  • 28. The circuitry of claim 22 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are unsigned numbers having mantissas and separate sign bits; said circuitry further comprising:logic to count each of said numbers having a sign bit equal to 1, representing a negative addend or a subtraction, for input to said compressor; andlogic to invert said mantissas of any negative addend, and any minuend in any subtraction operation, for input to said compressor.
  • 29. The circuitry of claim 22 wherein: said floating-point addition operations include one or both of negative addends and subtraction operations; andsaid numbers are signed numbers having sign bits as part of their mantissas; said circuitry further comprising:logic to count subtraction control bits associated with said numbers for input to said compressor.
US Referenced Citations (351)
Number Name Date Kind
3473160 Wahlstrom Oct 1969 A
3800130 Martinson et al. Mar 1974 A
4156927 McElroy et al. May 1979 A
4179746 Tubbs Dec 1979 A
4212076 Conners Jul 1980 A
4215406 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4215407 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4422155 Amir et al. Dec 1983 A
4484259 Palmer et al. Nov 1984 A
4521907 Amir et al. Jun 1985 A
4575812 Kloker et al. Mar 1986 A
4597053 Chamberlin Jun 1986 A
4616330 Betz Oct 1986 A
4623961 Mackiewicz Nov 1986 A
4682302 Williams Jul 1987 A
4718057 Venkitakrishnan et al. Jan 1988 A
4727508 Williams Feb 1988 A
4736335 Barkan Apr 1988 A
4791590 Ku et al. Dec 1988 A
4799004 Mori Jan 1989 A
4823295 Mader Apr 1989 A
4839847 Laprade Jun 1989 A
4871930 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4908788 Fujiyama Mar 1990 A
4912345 Steele et al. Mar 1990 A
4918637 Morton Apr 1990 A
4967160 Quievy et al. Oct 1990 A
4982354 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1991 A
4991010 Hailey et al. Feb 1991 A
4994997 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
4999803 Turrini et al. Mar 1991 A
5073863 Zhang Dec 1991 A
5081604 Tanaka Jan 1992 A
5122685 Chan et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5175702 Beraud et al. Dec 1992 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5267187 Hsieh et al. Nov 1993 A
5296759 Sutherland et al. Mar 1994 A
5338983 Agarwala Aug 1994 A
5339263 White Aug 1994 A
5349250 New Sep 1994 A
5357152 Jennings, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5371422 Patel et al. Dec 1994 A
5373461 Bearden et al. Dec 1994 A
5375079 Uramoto et al. Dec 1994 A
5381357 Wedgwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5404324 Colon-Bonet Apr 1995 A
5424589 Dobbelaere et al. Jun 1995 A
5446651 Moyse et al. Aug 1995 A
5451948 Jekel Sep 1995 A
5452231 Butts et al. Sep 1995 A
5452375 Rousseau et al. Sep 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465226 Goto Nov 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5483178 Costello et al. Jan 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5500812 Saishi et al. Mar 1996 A
5500828 Doddington et al. Mar 1996 A
5523963 Hsieh et al. Jun 1996 A
5528550 Pawate et al. Jun 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5541864 Van Bavel et al. Jul 1996 A
5546018 New et al. Aug 1996 A
5550993 Ehlig et al. Aug 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5563526 Hastings et al. Oct 1996 A
5563819 Nelson Oct 1996 A
5570039 Oswald et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5572148 Lytle et al. Nov 1996 A
5581501 Sansbury et al. Dec 1996 A
5590350 Guttag et al. Dec 1996 A
5594366 Khong et al. Jan 1997 A
5594912 Brueckmann et al. Jan 1997 A
5596763 Guttag et al. Jan 1997 A
5606266 Pedersen Feb 1997 A
5617058 Adrian et al. Apr 1997 A
5631848 Laczko et al. May 1997 A
5633601 Nagaraj May 1997 A
5636150 Okamoto Jun 1997 A
5636368 Harrison et al. Jun 1997 A
5640578 Balmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5644519 Yatim Jul 1997 A
5644522 Moyse et al. Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5646875 Taborn et al. Jul 1997 A
5648732 Duncan Jul 1997 A
5652903 Weng et al. Jul 1997 A
5655069 Ogawara et al. Aug 1997 A
5664192 Lloyd et al. Sep 1997 A
5689195 Cliff et al. Nov 1997 A
5696708 Leung Dec 1997 A
5729495 Madurawe Mar 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5744980 McGowan et al. Apr 1998 A
5744991 Jefferson et al. Apr 1998 A
5754459 Telikepalli May 1998 A
5761483 Trimberger Jun 1998 A
5764555 McPherson et al. Jun 1998 A
5768613 Asghar Jun 1998 A
5771186 Kodali et al. Jun 1998 A
5777912 Leung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5790446 Yu et al. Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5801546 Pierce et al. Sep 1998 A
5805477 Perner Sep 1998 A
5805913 Guttag et al. Sep 1998 A
5808926 Gorshtein et al. Sep 1998 A
5812479 Cliff et al. Sep 1998 A
5812562 Baeg Sep 1998 A
5815422 Dockser Sep 1998 A
5821776 McGowan Oct 1998 A
5825202 Tavana et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5841684 Dockser Nov 1998 A
5847579 Trimberger Dec 1998 A
5847978 Ogura et al. Dec 1998 A
5847981 Kelley et al. Dec 1998 A
5859878 Phillips et al. Jan 1999 A
5869979 Bocchino Feb 1999 A
5872380 Rostoker et al. Feb 1999 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5878250 LeBlanc Mar 1999 A
5880981 Kojima et al. Mar 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894228 Reddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5898602 Rothman et al. Apr 1999 A
5931898 Khoury Aug 1999 A
5942914 Reddy et al. Aug 1999 A
5944774 Dent Aug 1999 A
5949710 Pass et al. Sep 1999 A
5951673 Miyata Sep 1999 A
5956265 Lewis Sep 1999 A
5959871 Pierzchala et al. Sep 1999 A
5960193 Guttag et al. Sep 1999 A
5961635 Guttag et al. Oct 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5963050 Young et al. Oct 1999 A
5968196 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5978260 Trimberger et al. Nov 1999 A
5982195 Cliff et al. Nov 1999 A
5986465 Mendel Nov 1999 A
5991788 Mintzer Nov 1999 A
5991898 Rajski et al. Nov 1999 A
5995748 Guttag et al. Nov 1999 A
5999015 Cliff et al. Dec 1999 A
5999990 Sharrit et al. Dec 1999 A
6005806 Madurawe et al. Dec 1999 A
6006321 Abbott Dec 1999 A
6009451 Burns Dec 1999 A
6018755 Gonikberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6020759 Heile Feb 2000 A
6021423 Nag et al. Feb 2000 A
6029187 Verbauwhede Feb 2000 A
6031763 Sansbury Feb 2000 A
6041339 Yu et al. Mar 2000 A
6041340 Mintzer Mar 2000 A
6052327 Reddy et al. Apr 2000 A
6052755 Terrill et al. Apr 2000 A
6052773 DeHon et al. Apr 2000 A
6055555 Boswell et al. Apr 2000 A
6064614 Khoury May 2000 A
6065131 Andrews et al. May 2000 A
6066960 Pedersen May 2000 A
6069487 Lane et al. May 2000 A
6072994 Phillips et al. Jun 2000 A
6073154 Dick Jun 2000 A
6075381 LaBerge Jun 2000 A
6084429 Trimberger Jul 2000 A
6085317 Smith Jul 2000 A
6091261 DeLange Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6097988 Tobias Aug 2000 A
6098163 Guttag et al. Aug 2000 A
6107820 Jefferson et al. Aug 2000 A
6107821 Kelem et al. Aug 2000 A
6107824 Reddy et al. Aug 2000 A
6130554 Kolze et al. Oct 2000 A
6140839 Kaviani et al. Oct 2000 A
6144980 Oberman Nov 2000 A
6154049 New Nov 2000 A
6157210 Zaveri et al. Dec 2000 A
6163788 Chen et al. Dec 2000 A
6167415 Fischer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175849 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226735 Mirsky May 2001 B1
6242947 Trimberger Jun 2001 B1
6243729 Staszewski Jun 2001 B1
6246258 Lesea Jun 2001 B1
6260053 Maulik et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279021 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286024 Yano et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314442 Suzuki Nov 2001 B1
6314551 Borland Nov 2001 B1
6321246 Page et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323680 Pedersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327605 Arakawa et al. Dec 2001 B2
6346824 New Feb 2002 B1
6351142 Abbott Feb 2002 B1
6353843 Chehrazi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359468 Park et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360240 Takano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362650 New et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366944 Hossain et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367003 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6369610 Cheung et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377970 Abdallah et al. Apr 2002 B1
6407576 Ngai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407694 Cox et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427157 Webb Jul 2002 B1
6434587 Liao et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438569 Abbott Aug 2002 B1
6438570 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6446107 Knowles Sep 2002 B1
6453382 Heile Sep 2002 B1
6467017 Ngai et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480980 Koe Nov 2002 B2
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487575 Oberman Nov 2002 B1
6523055 Yu et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523057 Savo et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531888 Abbott Mar 2003 B2
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542000 Black et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557092 Callen Apr 2003 B1
6571268 Giacalone et al. May 2003 B1
6573749 New et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574762 Karimi et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578060 Chen et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591283 Conway et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591357 Mirsky Jul 2003 B2
6600495 Boland et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600788 Dick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628140 Langhammer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6687722 Larsson et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692534 Wang et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700581 Baldwin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6725441 Keller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728901 Rajski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731133 Feng et al. May 2004 B1
6732134 Rosenberg et al. May 2004 B1
6744278 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745254 Boggs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763367 Kwon et al. Jul 2004 B2
6771094 Langhammer et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774669 Liu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781408 Langhammer Aug 2004 B1
6781410 Pani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788104 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801924 Green et al. Oct 2004 B1
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874079 Hogenauer Mar 2005 B2
6889238 Johnson May 2005 B2
6904471 Boggs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924663 Masui et al. Aug 2005 B2
6963890 Dutta et al. Nov 2005 B2
6971083 Farrugia et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978287 Langhammer Dec 2005 B1
6983300 Ferroussat Jan 2006 B2
7020673 Ozawa Mar 2006 B2
7024446 Langhammer et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047272 Giacalone et al. May 2006 B2
7062526 Hoyle Jun 2006 B1
7093204 Oktem et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107305 Deng et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113969 Green et al. Sep 2006 B1
7181484 Stribaek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7230451 Langhammer Jun 2007 B1
7313585 Winterrowd Dec 2007 B2
7343388 Burney et al. Mar 2008 B1
7395298 Debes et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401109 Koc et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409417 Lou Aug 2008 B2
7415542 Hennedy et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421465 Rarick et al. Sep 2008 B1
7428565 Fujimori Sep 2008 B2
7428566 Siu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430578 Debes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430656 Sperber et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447310 Koc et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472155 Simkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7508936 Eberle et al. Mar 2009 B2
7536430 Guevokian et al. May 2009 B2
7567997 Simkins et al. Jul 2009 B2
7590676 Langhammer Sep 2009 B1
7646430 Brown Elliott et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668896 Lutz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7719446 Rosenthal et al. May 2010 B2
7720898 Driker et al. May 2010 B2
7769797 Cho et al. Aug 2010 B2
7917567 Mason et al. Mar 2011 B1
7930335 Gura Apr 2011 B2
7930336 Langhammer Apr 2011 B2
8090758 Shimanek et al. Jan 2012 B1
8112456 Van Hoff et al. Feb 2012 B1
20010023425 Oberman et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20010037352 Hong Nov 2001 A1
20020002573 Landers et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032713 Jou et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038324 Page et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020049798 Wang et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078114 Wang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20020116434 Nancekievill Aug 2002 A1
20030088757 Lindner et al. May 2003 A1
20040064770 Xin Apr 2004 A1
20040083412 Corbin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103133 Gurney May 2004 A1
20040122882 Zakharov et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148321 Guevorkian et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172439 Lin Sep 2004 A1
20040178818 Crotty et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193981 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040267857 Abel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267863 Bhushan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038842 Stoye Feb 2005 A1
20050144212 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144215 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144216 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187997 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187999 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050262175 Iino et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060020655 Lin Jan 2006 A1
20060112160 Ishii et al. May 2006 A1
20070083585 St. Denis et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070185951 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185952 Langhammer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070241773 Hutchings et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080133627 Langhammer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159441 Liao et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183783 Tubbs Jul 2008 A1
20090083358 Allen Mar 2009 A1
20090113186 Kato et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090172052 DeLaquil et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187615 Abe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228689 Muff et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090300088 Michaels et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100098189 Oketani Apr 2010 A1
20100146022 Swartzlander et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191939 Muff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20120166512 Wong et al. Jun 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
0 158 430 Oct 1985 EP
0 380 456 Aug 1990 EP
0 411 491 Feb 1991 EP
0 419 105 Mar 1991 EP
0 461 798 Dec 1991 EP
0 498 066 Aug 1992 EP
0 555 092 Aug 1993 EP
0 606 653 Jul 1994 EP
0 657 803 Jun 1995 EP
0 660 227 Jun 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 721 159 Jul 1996 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
0 909 028 Apr 1999 EP
0 927 393 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 885 Apr 2000 EP
1 031 934 Aug 2000 EP
1 058 185 Dec 2000 EP
1 220 108 Jul 2002 EP
2 283 602 May 1995 GB
2 286 737 Aug 1995 GB
2 318 198 Apr 1998 GB
61-237133 Oct 1986 JP
63-216131 Aug 1988 JP
4-332036 Nov 1992 JP
5-134851 Jun 1993 JP
06-187129 Jul 1994 JP
7-135447 May 1995 JP
11-296345 Oct 1999 JP
2000-259394 Sep 2000 JP
2002-108606 Apr 2002 JP
2002-251281 Sep 2002 JP
WO95-27243 Oct 1995 WO
WO96-28774 Sep 1996 WO
WO97-08606 Mar 1997 WO
WO98-12629 Mar 1998 WO
WO98-32071 Jul 1998 WO
WO98-38741 Sep 1998 WO
WO99-22292 May 1999 WO
WO99-31574 Jun 1999 WO
WO99-56394 Nov 1999 WO
WO00-51239 Aug 2000 WO
WO00-52824 Sep 2000 WO
WO01-13562 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2005066832 Jul 2005 WO
WO2005-101190 Oct 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (82)
Entry
Altera Corporation, “Stratix II Device Handbook, Chapter 6—DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,” v1.1, Jul. 2004.
Xilinx Inc., “Complex Multiplier v2.0”, DS291 Product Specification/Datasheet, Nov. 2004.
Martinson, L. et al., “Digital Matched Filtering with Pipelined Floating Point Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT's),” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-23, No. 2, pp. 222-234, Apr. 1975.
Altera Corporation, “FIR Compiler: MegaCore® Function User Guide,” version 3.3.0, rev. 1, pp. 3 11 through 3 15 (Oct. 2005).
Haynes, S.D., et al., “Configurable multiplier blocks for embedding in FPGAs,” Electronics Letters, vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 638-639 (Apr. 2, 1998).
Kim, Y., et al., “Fast GPU Implementation for the Solution of Tridiagonal Matrix Systems,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 692-704, Dec. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “A Library of Parameterizable Floating-Point Cores for FPGAs and Their Application to Scientific Computing,” Proc Int'l Conf. Eng. Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA'05), Jun. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “Analysis of High-performance Floating-point Arithmetic on FPGAs,” Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (PDPS'04), pp. 149-156, Apr. 2004.
Nakasato, N., et al., “Acceleration of Hydrosynamical Simulations using a FPGA board”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-47, vol. 105, No. 515, Jan. 17, 2006.
Osana, Y., et al., “Hardware-resource Utilization Analysis on an FPGA-Based Biochemical Simulator ReCSiP”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-63, vol. 105, No. 516, Jan. 18, 2006.
Vladimirova, T. et al., “Floating-Point Mathematical Co-Processor for a Single-Chip On-Board Computer,” MAPLD'03 Conference, D5, Sep. 2003.
Altera Corporation, “Digital Signal Processing (DSP),” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, v1.1 (Sep. 2004).
Altera Corporation, “DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6, v4.0 (Oct. 2005).
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32.
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192).
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461.
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics , 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698.
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal, vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168.
Berg, B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001.
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASIC SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002.
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10.
Colet, p., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18.
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384.
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286.
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111.
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445.
Gaffer, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002.
Guccione, S.A.,“Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873.
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http:--www.ee.washington.edu-people-faculty-hauck-publications-ReconfigFuture.PDF.
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411.
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001.
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, ORCA® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: ispLEVER® Version 3.0, 2002.
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997.
“Implementing Multipliers in FLEX 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996.
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in FLEX 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1.
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA,” 1996 2nd International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 96TH8140) Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279.
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38.
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software-FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. MICRO '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93.
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No. 99TH8465), vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525.
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic,” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115.
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http:--www.eetimes.com-editorial-1998-coverstory9805.html.
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11.
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310.
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloquium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2-1-2-4.
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84.
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997. Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CA, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106.
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (Cat. No. 91CH2976-9) vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018.
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No. 00EX404), Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138.
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93.
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B.
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B.
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition), vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114, 116.
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302.
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303), Jul. 26-28, 1999, pp. 147-150.
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Literature No. SPRU131F, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29.
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673), Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273.
Tralka, C., “Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96.
Underwood, K. “FPGAs vs. CPUs: Trends in Peak Floating-Point Performance,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM-SIGDA 12th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, pp. 171-180, Feb. 22-24, 2004.
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4.
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998.
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication,” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http:--mathworld.wolfram.com-KaratsubaMultiplication.html.
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik , vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86.
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000.
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000.
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39.
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257.
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http:--www.iro.umontreal.ca-˜aboulham-F6221-Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http:--www.xilinx.com-prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm.
Xilinx Inc., “XtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide,” v 1.2, Feb. 4, 2005.
Altera Corporation, “Advanced Synthesis Cookbook: A Design Guide for Stratix II, Stratix III and Stratix IV Devices,” Document Version 3.0, 112 pgs., May 2008.
deDinechin, F. et al., “Large multipliers with less DSP blocks,” retrieved from http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00356421/en/, 9 pgs., available online Jan. 2009.
Wajih, E.-H.Y. et al., “Efficient Hardware Architecture of Recursive Karatsuba-Ofman Multiplier,” 3rd International Conference on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 6 pgs, Mar. 2008.
Zhou, G. et al., “Efficient and High-Throughput Implementations of AES-GCM on FPGAs,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 8 pgs., Dec. 2007.
Altera Corp., “DSP Blocks in Stratix III Devices,” Stratix III Device Handbook, vol. 1, Chapter 5, pp. 1-42, Mar. 2010.
Karlström, P., et al., “High Performance, Low Latency FPGA based Floating Point Adder and Multiplier Units in a Virtex 4,” Norchip Conf., pp. 31-34, 2006.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Floating Point Multiplication Architecture (CIFM) for FPGSs and Its Reversible Logic Implementation”, Proceedings MWSCAS 2006, Puerto Rico, 5 pages, Aug. 2006.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Variable Precision (CIVP) Floating Point Multiplication Architecture for FPGAs”, Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA'07), Las Vegas, US, vol. 1, pp. 449-450, Jun. 2007.
Xilinx, Inc., Virtex-5 ExtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide UG193, v2.6, 114 pages, Oct. 2007.
Xilinx, Inc., “Implementing Barrel Shifters Using Multipliers,” p. 1-4, Aug. 17, 2004.