The present disclosure relates generally to cables for use in the telecommunications industry, and various methods associated with such cables. More particularly, this disclosure relates to a telecommunications cable having twisted conductor pairs.
Twisted pairs cables include at least one pair of insulated conductors twisted about one another to form a two conductor pair. A number of two conductor pairs can be twisted about each other to define a twisted pair core. A plastic jacket is typically extruded over a twisted pair core to maintain the configuration of the core, and to function as a protective layer. Such cables are commonly referred to as multi-pair cables.
The telecommunications industry is continuously striving to increase the speed and/or volume of signal transmissions through multi-pair cables. One problem that concerns the telecommunications industry is the increased occurrence of alien crosstalk associated with high-speed signal transmissions. In some applications, alien crosstalk problems are addressed by providing multi-pair cables having a layer of electrical shielding between the core of twisted pairs and the cable jacket. Such shielding however is expensive to manufacture; accordingly, unshielded twisted pair cables are more often used.
Without electrical shielding, and with the increase in signal frequencies associated with high-speed transmissions, alien crosstalk can be problematic. Undesired
Without electrical shielding, and with the increase in signal frequencies associated with high-speed transmissions, alien crosstalk can be problematic. Undesired crosstalk in a cable is primarily a function of cable capacitance. As a cable produces more capacitance, the amount of crosstalk increases. Capacitance of a cable is dependent on two factors: 1) the center-to-center distance between the twisted pairs of adjacent cables, and 2) the overall dielectric constant of the cables.
One aspect of the present disclosure relates to a multi-pair cable having a double jacket. The double jacket is arranged and configured to reduce the occurrence of alien crosstalk with an adjacent cable, while still accommodating attachment of existing conventional cable connectors. The double jacket includes two separate inner and outer jackets; the outer jacket increases the center-to-center distance between adjacent cables, yet the outer jacket can be stripped away for attachment of an existing cable connector to the inner jacket. The inner and outer jackets can further include channels that also lessen the occurrence of alien crosstalk by reducing the overall dielectric constant of the multi-pair cable.
A variety of examples of desirable product features or methods are set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practicing various aspects of the disclosure. The aspects of the disclosure may relate to individual features as well as combinations of features. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory only, and are not restrictive of the claimed invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to various features of the present disclosure that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Referring to
The conductors 14 may be made of copper, aluminum, copper-clad steel and plated copper, for example. It has been found that copper is an optimal conductor material. In addition, the conductor may be made of glass or plastic fiber such that a fiber optic cable is produced in accordance with the principles disclosed. The insulating layer 16 can be made of known materials, such as fluoropolymers or other electrical insulating materials, for example.
The plurality of twisted pairs 12 defines a cable core 20. The cable core 20 can include a separator, such as a flexible tape strip 22, to separate the twisted pairs 12. Other types of separators, including fillers defining pockets that separate and/or retain each of the twisted pairs, can also be used. Further details of example fillers that can be used are described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/746,800 and 11/318,350; which applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Each of the conductors 14 of the individual twisted pairs 12 can be twisted about one another at a continuously changing twist rate, an incremental twist rate, or a constant twist rate. Each of the twist rates of the twisted pairs 12 can further be the same as the twist rates of some or all of the other twisted pairs, or different from each of the other twisted pairs. The core 20 of twisted pairs 12 can also be twisted about a central core axis. The core 20 can be similarly twisted at any of a continuously changing, incremental, or constant twist rate.
Referring still to
In particular, the addition of the outer jacket 26 reduces the capacitance of the cable 10 by increasing the center-to-center distance between the cable 10 and an adjacent cable. Reducing the capacitance by increasing the center-to-center distance between two adjacent cables reduces the occurrence of alien crosstalk between the cables. Accordingly, the outer jacket 26 has an outer diameter OD1 that distances the core 20 of twisted pairs 12 further from adjacent cables than conventional arrangements. Ideally, the cores 20 of twisted pairs 12 of adjacent cables are as far apart as possible to minimize the capacitance between adjacent cables.
There are, however, limits to how far apart the double jacket can place one cable from an adjacent cable. Practical, as well as economical constraints, are imposed on the size of the resulting double jacket cable. A cable cannot be so large that it is impractical to use in an intended environment, and cannot be so large as to preclude use with existing standard connectors. In the illustrated embodiment, the outer diameter OD1 (
The disclosed double jacket is provided as two separate inner and outer jackets 24, 26, as opposed to a single, extra thick jacket layer. This double jacket feature reduces alien crosstalk by distancing the cores of adjacent cables, while at the same time accommodating the design limitations of conventional cable connectors. That is, conventional cable connectors are typically designed to fit a standard size cable jacket. The inner jacket 24 of the present cable 10 is preferably manufactured with an outer diameter OD2 (
The diameters of each of the inner jacket 24 and the outer jacket 26 accommodate the practical aspects of standardized telecommunications components, while at the same time address the first factor associated with the capacitance of a cable to reduce the problem of alien crosstalk between adjacent cables. In addition, the present cable 10 further lessens the occurrence of alien crosstalk by addressing the second factor associated with the capacitance of a cable. That is, the inner and outer jackets 24, 26 are designed to reduce an overall dielectric constant of the cable 10 to reduce alien crosstalk. What is meant by “overall” dielectric constant is the combined effective dielectric constant of the cable produced by the combination of the dielectric constants of the cable components.
Referring now to
In the illustrated embodiment, the channels 34 have a generally square or splined cross-sectional shape. That is, each channel 34 is defined by three surfaces: a bottom surface 36 (
As shown in
Preferably, the number of channels 34 of the inner jacket 24 is such that a balance of structural stability and reduced overall dielectric constant is achieved. That is, the inner jacket 24 preferably has enough channels to reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable, as will be described in greater detail hereinafter; yet still has enough structure to adequately support and retain the core 20 of twisted pairs 12.
The inner jacket 24 has an associated dielectric constant dictated by the type of material used to manufacture the jacket. Common materials used for jackets include plastic materials, such as fluoropolymers (e.g. ethylenechlorotrifluorothylene (ECTF) and Flurothylenepropylene (FEP)), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethelene, or other electrically insulating materials, for example. Such materials commonly have a dielectric constant of approximately 2.0. Although a dielectric constant of 2.0 is not ideal, these materials are used because of their cost effectiveness and/or flame retardancy. Flame retardancy of the jacket material is important. Preferably, the material does not propagate flames or generate a significant amount of smoke.
The inner jacket 24 is configured to reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. Referring now to
As shown in
The cross-sectional area A2 of the inner jacket 24 and the cross-sectional area A1 of the channels 34 both contribute to the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. For example, the dielectric properties of the particular inner jacket 24 material (taken as a solid) in combination with the dielectric properties of the material/medium contained within the channels 34 contribute to the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10.
The actual dielectric constants of the preferred jacket material and the preferred medium contained within the channels is described in greater detail hereinafter. The inner jacket 24 is configured such that a ratio of the cross-sectional area A2 of the inner jacket 24 and the cross-sectional area A1 of the channels 34 provides a sufficient reduction in the overall dielectric properties of the cable 10 to reduce the occurrence of alien crosstalk.
In general, preferably, the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10 is no greater than about 1.8 and as close as possible to 1.0. The closer the dielectric constant is to 1.0, the higher the frequencies at which the cable can be used without problematic alien crosstalk. As previously described, common jacket materials have a dielectric constant close to 2.0. Air has a dielectric constant of 1.0. To reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10, the cross-sectional areas A1 of the channels 34 of the inner jacket 24 preferably introduce as much air as possible. Yet, the inner jacket 24 must also have enough structure to protect and support the core 20 of twisted pairs 12. Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional areas A2/A1 is no greater than 20:1. In the illustrated embodiment, the ratio A2/A 1 is approximately 16:1.
The ratio defined by the medium within the channels 34 (e.g., air having a dielectric constant of 1.0) and the structure of the inner jacket 24 reduces the dielectric constant contributed by the jacket 24. That is, the inclusion of channels 34 containing air having a lower dielectric constant than that of the jacket material lowers the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. The reduction of the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10 in turn reduces the occurrence of alien crosstalk and improves the quality of high-speed signal transmission through the cable 10.
The channels 34 of the inner jacket 24 can include medium or materials other than air, such as other gases or polymers. Preferably, the material contained within the channels 34 has a different dielectric constant from that of the material of the jacket 24 (i.e., a lesser dielectric constant) to reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10.
Referring now to
As shown in
The outer jacket 26 has an associated dielectric constant dictated by the type of material used to manufacture the jacket. Materials that can be used for the outer jacket include plastic materials, such as fluoropolymers (e.g. ethylenechlorotrifluorothylene (ECTF) and Flurothylenepropylene (FEP)), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethelene, or other electrically insulating materials, for example. As previously described, such materials commonly have a dielectric constant of approximately 2.0. Preferably, the material is flame retardant and does not propagate flames or generate a significant amount of smoke.
Similar to the inner jacket 24, the outer jacket 26 is configured to reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. Referring now to
As shown in
As previously described, the cross-sectional area A4 of the outer jacket 26 and the cross-sectional area A3 of the channels 44 both contribute to the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. The outer jacket 26 is configured such that a ratio of the cross-sectional area A4 of the outer jacket 26 and the cross-sectional area A3 of the channels 44 produces a sufficient reduction in the overall dielectric properties of the cable 10 to reduce the occurrence of alien crosstalk. Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional areas A4/A3 of the outer jacket 26 is no greater than 20:1. In the illustrated embodiment, the ratio of A4/A3 is approximately 18:1.
Similar to the ratio of the inner jacket 24, the ratio defined by the medium within the channels 44 (e.g., air having a dielectric constant of 1.0) and the structure of the outer jacket 26 reduces the dielectric constant contributed by the jacket 26. That is, the inclusion of channels 44 containing air having a lower dielectric constant than that of the jacket material lowers the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10. The reduction of the overall dielectric constant of the cable 10 in turn reduces the occurrence of alien crosstalk and improves the quality of high-speed signal transmission through the cable 10.
The channels 44 of the outer jacket 26 can also include medium or materials other than air, such as other gases or polymers. The channels 34 and 44 of each of the jackets 24, 26 can further contain materials that are the same or different from one another.
Referring now to
The cable 100 includes a double jacket that surrounds the core 120 of twisted pairs 112. In particular, the cable 100 preferably includes both a first inner jacket 124 and a second outer jacket 126. The inner jacket 124 surrounds the core 120 of twisted pairs 112. The outer jacket 126 surrounds the inner jacket 124.
The inner and outer jackets 124, 126 are similar in construction, material, and use, as described with respect to the inner and outer jackets 24, 26 of the first cable embodiment 10; with the exception of the shape of the jacket channels (i.e. 134, 144). For example, the outer jacket 126 has an outer diameter OD3 (
Referring now to
As shown in
Preferably, the number of channels 134 of the inner jacket 124 is such that a balance of structural stability and reduced overall dielectric constant is achieved. That is, the inner jacket 124 preferably has enough channels to reduce the overall dielectric constant of the cable; yet still has enough structure to adequately support and retain the core 120 of twisted pairs 112.
Still referring to
As shown in
The cross-sectional area A6 of the inner jacket 124 and the cross-sectional area A5 of the channels 134 both contribute to the overall dielectric constant of the cable 100. In general, the overall dielectric constant of the cable 100 is preferably no greater than about 1.8 and as close as possible to 1.0. The inner jacket 124 is configured such that a ratio of the cross-sectional area A6 of the inner jacket 124 and the cross-sectional area A5 of the channels 134 provides a sufficient reduction in the overall dielectric properties of the cable 100 to reduce the occurrence of alien crosstalk. Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional areas A6/A5 is no greater than 20:1. In the illustrated embodiment, the ratio A6/A5 is approximately 9:1.
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring to
As shown in
As previously described, the cross-sectional area A8 of the outer jacket 126 and the cross-sectional area A7 of the channels 144 both contribute to the overall dielectric constant of the cable 100. The outer jacket 126 is configured such that a ratio of the cross-sectional area A8 of the inner jacket 126 and the cross-sectional area A7 of the channels 144 produces a sufficient reduction in the overall dielectric properties of the cable 100 to reduce the occurrence of alien crosstalk. Preferably, the ratio of the cross-sectional areas A8/A7 is no greater than 20:1. In the illustrated embodiment, the ratio A8/A7 is approximately 9:1.
The channels 34, 44, 134, 144 formed in the jackets of the presently disclose cables 10, 100 are distinguished from other jacket or insulation layers that may contain air due to the porous property of the jacket or layer. For example, the presently described jackets having channels differ from foam insulation, which has closed-cell air pockets within the insulation. Foam insulation is difficult to work with and requires specialized, expensive equipment. Foam insulation also tends to be unstable because foaming does not produce uniform pockets throughout the insulation thereby producing unpredictable performance characteristics. The present cable overcomes these problems.
Referring now to
The inner and outer jackets 224, 226 are similar in construction, material, and use, as described with respect to the inner and outer jackets of the first and second cable embodiments 10, 100; with the exception of the channels. In particular, the double jacket of the cable 200 can include channels in only one of the inner and outer jackets 224, 226. In
In yet another alternative embodiment, both of the inner and outer jackets 224, 226 can be manufactured without channels. In an embodiment having a double jacket without any channels, capacitance of the cable 200 is reduced simply by the increase in the center-to-center distance from an adjacent cable, to thereby reduce alien crosstalk between the adjacent cables.
The above specification provides a complete description of the present invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, certain aspects of the invention reside in the claims hereinafter appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/373,819, filed Mar. 9, 2006; which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
326021 | Cruickshank | Sep 1885 | A |
504397 | Marsh | Sep 1893 | A |
1008370 | Robillot | Nov 1911 | A |
2386818 | Seavey | Oct 1945 | A |
2556244 | Weston | Jun 1951 | A |
2583026 | Swift | Jan 1952 | A |
2690592 | Schanz | Oct 1954 | A |
2708176 | Rhodes | May 1955 | A |
2766481 | Henning | Oct 1956 | A |
2804494 | Fenton | Aug 1957 | A |
3035115 | Heckel et al. | May 1962 | A |
3064073 | Downing et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3086557 | Peterson | Apr 1963 | A |
3315025 | Tomlinson | Apr 1967 | A |
3422648 | Lemelson | Jan 1969 | A |
3459877 | Bullock et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3473986 | Hureau | Oct 1969 | A |
3644659 | Campbell | Feb 1972 | A |
3650862 | Burr | Mar 1972 | A |
3678177 | Lawrenson | Jul 1972 | A |
3771934 | Delves-Broughton | Nov 1973 | A |
3812282 | Johansson | May 1974 | A |
3892912 | Hauck | Jul 1975 | A |
3905853 | Stent | Sep 1975 | A |
3911070 | Lundsager | Oct 1975 | A |
3972970 | Taylor | Aug 1976 | A |
3983313 | Ney et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4050867 | Ferrentino et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4132756 | Ferrentino et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4138457 | Rudd et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4181486 | Saito | Jan 1980 | A |
4321228 | de Kok | Mar 1982 | A |
4370076 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4394705 | Blachman | Jul 1983 | A |
4731505 | Crenshaw et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4745238 | Kotthaus et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755629 | Beggs et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4777325 | Siwinski | Oct 1988 | A |
5042904 | Story et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5162120 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5162609 | Adriaenssens et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5216204 | Dudek et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220130 | Walters | Jun 1993 | A |
5286923 | Prudhon et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5448669 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5486654 | Hanak et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493071 | Newmoyer | Feb 1996 | A |
5514837 | Kenny et al. | May 1996 | A |
5541361 | Friesen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5563377 | Arpin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5742002 | Arredondo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796044 | Cobian et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796046 | Newmoyer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814768 | Wessels et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821467 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841072 | Gagnon | Nov 1998 | A |
5922155 | Clouet et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5956445 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5990419 | Bogese, II | Nov 1999 | A |
6150612 | Grandy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162992 | Clark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6218621 | Kuczynski | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222130 | Gareis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254924 | Brorein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271472 | Mattos et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288340 | Arnould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297454 | Gareis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303867 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310295 | Despard | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355876 | Morimoto | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365836 | Blouin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441308 | Gagnon | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452105 | Badii et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465737 | Bonato et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476323 | Beebe et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6476326 | Fuzier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506976 | Neveux, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534715 | Maunder et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566605 | Prudhon | May 2003 | B1 |
6570095 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573456 | Spruell et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6596944 | Clark et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6639152 | Glew et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6686537 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717058 | Booth et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743983 | Wiekhorst et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770819 | Patel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787697 | Stipes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800811 | Boucino | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815617 | Gebs et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818832 | Hopkinson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6844500 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855889 | Gareis | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875928 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6998537 | Clark et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7049519 | Wiekhorst et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7145080 | Boisvert et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154043 | Clark | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7214884 | Kenny et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7271342 | Stutzman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271344 | Stutzman et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
20010001426 | Gareis et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010040042 | Stipes | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030106704 | Isley et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111241 | Bahlmann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030168228 | Eichelberger et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030230427 | Gareis | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040035603 | Clark et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040736 | Nishimura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040045731 | Garland | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055777 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055779 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055781 | Cornibert et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040149483 | Glew | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040149484 | Clark | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216913 | Wiekhorst et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050006132 | Clark | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050061536 | Proulx | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077066 | Stipes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050167146 | Wiekhorst et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050199415 | Glew | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050269125 | Clark | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060118322 | Wiekhorst et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
539772 | Jul 1959 | BE |
524452 | May 1956 | CA |
2133453 | Jan 1973 | DE |
1 081 720 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 548 754 | Jun 2005 | EP |
725624 | Mar 1955 | GB |
811703 | Apr 1959 | GB |
WO 2004029993 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080115959 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11373819 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11891664 | US |