The present invention relates to high-speed data communications cables using at least two twisted pairs of insulated conductors. More particularly, the invention relates to high-speed data communications cables having a light-weight, configurable core-refilling isolation pair separator that provides geometrical separation between the twisted pairs of insulated conductors.
High-speed data communications media in current usage include pairs of insulated conductors twisted together to form a balanced transmission line. Such pairs of insulated conductors are referred to herein as “twisted pairs.” When twisted pairs are closely placed, such as in a cable, electrical energy may be transferred from one twisted pair of a cable to another twisted pair. Such energy transferred between twisted pairs is referred to as crosstalk. As operating frequencies increase, improved crosstalk isolation between the twisted pairs becomes more critical.
The Telecommunications Industry Association and the Electronics Industry Association (TIA/EIA) have developed standards which specify specific categories of performance for cable impedance, attenuation, skew and particularly crosstalk isolation. One standard for crosstalk or, in particular, crosstalk isolation, is TIA/EIA-568-A, wherein a category 5 cable is required to have 38 dB of isolation between the twisted pairs at 100 MHz and a category 6 cable is required to have 42 dB of isolation between the twisted pairs at 100 MHz. Various cable design techniques have been used to date in order to try to reduce crosstalk and to attempt to meet the industry standards.
For example, one cable implementation known in the industry that has been manufactured and sold as a high-speed data communications cable, includes the twisted pairs formed with relatively tight twists, and the cable is formed into a round construction. In this conventional cable, each twisted pair has a specified distance between twists along a longitudinal direction of the twisted pair, that distance being referred to as the “twist lay.” When adjacent twisted pairs have the same twist lay and/or twist direction, they tend to lie within a cable more closely spaced than when the twisted pairs have different twist lays and/or a different twist direction. Such close spacing increases the amount of undesirable crosstalk which occurs between the twisted pairs. In some conventional cables, each twisted pair within the cable has a unique twist lay in order to increase the spacing between pairs and thereby to reduce the crosstalk between twisted pairs of the cable. In addition, the twist direction of the twisted pairs may also be varied. However, this industry standard configuration can only achieve limited crosstalk isolation.
Another cable implementation 100 disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,777,325, is illustrated in
Another cable implementation which addresses the problem of twisted pairs lying too closely together within the cable is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,711 and is illustrated in FIG. 2. In particular, the cable includes, for example, four twisted pairs 124 disposed about a central pre-shaped support 126, wherein the support positions a twisted pair within grooves or channels 128 formed by the support. In particular, the support provides the grooves or channels which keep the twisted pairs at fixed positions with respect to each other. The support can have any of a number of shapes, including, for example, a standard “X”, a “+”, or the separator as is illustrated in FIG. 2. The prongs or protrusions 130 of the support preserve the geometry of the pairs relative to each other, which helps reduce and stabilize crosstalk between the twisted pairs. However, some problems with the support is that the support adds cost to the cable, may limit the flexibility of the cable and increases the size; e.g., the diameter, of the cable. Another problem may be that the material which forms the support may result in the overall cable being a potential fire and/or smoke hazard.
Still another known industry cable implementation 132 is illustrated in FIG. 3. The cable utilizes a jacket 134 with inward protrusions 136 that form channels 138 within the cable. A twisted pair 140 of conductors 142, 144 is disposed within each channel. The protrusions are used to provide adequate pair separation. However, one problem with these protrusions is that they can be difficult to manufacture. In addition, the protrusions may not provide adequate separation between the twisted pairs where the stability of the protrusions is difficult to provide, and thus performance repeatability of the cable is an issue. Further, another problem is that the jacket is not easily strippable. When the cable is to be stripped by removing the outer jacket, which is often done with a sharp device such as, for example, a razor, the protrusions will not be cut by the incision around the circumference of the jacket and will have to be broken off separately in order to remove the jacket.
Accordingly, some of the problems with the above known configurations are that they are expensive, difficult to use, are generally undesirably large, and have decreased flexibility of the cables and workability of the twisted pairs of wires.
Therefore, a need exists for a high-speed data cable having multiple twisted pair wires with desired crosstalk performance, improved handling and termination capabilities, that is inexpensive, flexible and has a desired size. This invention provides an improved data cable.
According to the invention, a data communications cable has been developed so as to better facilitate the cable for its the intended use of high speed data transmission, yet maintain a form factor that has desired flexibility and workability, and that is compatible with industry standard hardware, such as plugs and jacks. The data communications cable of the invention has the additional benefit of a reduced cabled size relative to other known cables within its performance class.
In particular, the present invention provides these advantages by utilizing a substantially flat configurable, highly flexible, core-filling, dielectric separator to provide twisted pair separation for the cable.
One embodiment of a data communications cable of the invention includes a first twisted pair of insulated conductors, a second twisted pair of insulated conductors, and the substantially flat dielectric pair separator. The substantially flat configurable dielectric pair separator is disposed between the first twisted pair of insulated conductors and the second twisted pair of insulated conductors The data communications cable also includes a jacket assembly enclosing the first twisted pair of insulated conductors, the second twisted pair of insulated conductors, and the substantially flat dielectric pair separator.
With this arrangement, the data communications cable can be made with desired crosstalk isolation between the twisted pairs of insulated conductors. In addition, due to the conforming nature and the desired thickness of the substantially flat configurable dielectric pair separator, the cable has desired flexibility, workability and size. Moreover, these advantages do not come at the expense of other properties of the cable such as, for example, size or reduced impedance stability. The substantially flat configurable dielectric pair separator also facilitates termination of the data communications cable to known industry standard hardware.
The objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in view of the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the figures, in which:
A number of embodiments of a data communications cable according to the invention will now be described in which the cable is constructed with a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors and a core made from a configurable, dielectric pair separator. However, it is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited to any number of twisted pairs or any profile for the configurable, dielectric pair separator illustrated in any of these embodiments. The inventive principles can be applied to cables including greater or fewer numbers of twisted pairs and having different core profiles of the configurable dielectric pair separator. In addition, although these embodiments of the invention are described and illustrated in connection with twisted pair data communication media, it is to be appreciated that other high-speed data communication media can be used instead of twisted pairs of conductors in the constructions of the cable according to the invention, such as, for example, fiber optic media.
The above-described embodiment of the data communications cable can be constructed using a number of different materials as the pair separator 14. While the invention is not limited to the materials described herein, the invention is advantageously practiced using these materials. In particular, the configurable pair separator is preferably a flame-retardant, low-dielectric constant, low-dissipation factor, foamed polymer tape, such as, for example, a foamed flame retardant, cellular polyolefin or fluoropolymer like NEPTC PP500 “SuperBulk”, a foamed fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) or a foamed polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The above-described pair separators are preferably used in a non-plenum rated application where the cable is not required to pass industry standard flame and smoke tests such as the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 910 test. Another preferable configurable pair separator is a woven fiberglass tape normally used as a binder for cables, such as, for example, Allied Fluoroglass CTX3X50. This woven fiberglass binder is preferably used in a plenum rated application where the cable must satisfy the UL 910 test.
Still another pair separator material that may be used in the cable of the invention is a bulk filling material such as a polyolefin or glass fiber filler that is flame-retardant and is typically shredded or fibrulated, but may also be solid, such as, for example, Chadwick AFT 033 Fiberglass. Such a bulk filling material is typically twisted up and used as a filling material in a core of the cable, with no other purpose. In particular, referring to
In the embodiment of the cable of
Referring again to
The embodiment of
It is preferable in the embodiments described herein that the protrusions 17 of the configurable pair separator extend at least beyond a center axis of each twisted pair, known in the art as a pitch radius. The pitch radius is illustrated in
As discussed above, it is to be appreciated that the twisted pairs of insulated conductors and configurable pair separator of the communications data cable of the invention, can be configured in a variety of ways.
Referring now to
Accordingly, some of the advantages of the various embodiments of the data communications cable of the invention are crosstalk performance and isolation enhancement can be configured and provided as customized cable solutions for hardware manufactures who request special requirements. For example, specific twisted pair combinations can receive a dedicated amount of isolation tape folds, thereby enhancing separation of selected twisted pairs and enhancing crosstalk isolation between the selected twisted pairs where an end user, for example, needs more crosstalk isolation. The data communications cable can also be made with a desired crosstalk isolation between the opposing twisted pairs of insulated conductors. In addition, due to the conforming nature and the thickness of the pair separator material, this advantage does not come at the expense of, for example, the size of the data communications cable, and does not result in a reduced impedance stability of the data communications cable. Another advantage is that the amorphous nature of the pair separator yields a desired cable that better facilitates termination of the data communications cable to known industry hardware, than larger diameter cables of the related art.
The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a Continuation of under 35 U.S.C. §120 to, commonly-owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/853,512, filed May 11, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,570,095, entitled Multi-Pair Data Cable with Configurable Core Filling and Pair Separation which is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §120 of commonly-owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/257,844, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,954 B1, entitled, Multi-Pair Data Cable with Configurable Core Filling and Pair Separation, filed Feb. 25, 1999, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
1883269 | Yonkers | Oct 1932 | A |
1976847 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1934 | A |
2538019 | Lee | Jan 1951 | A |
3622683 | Roberts et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3649744 | Coleman | Mar 1972 | A |
3819443 | Simons et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3881052 | Britz et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4034148 | Lang | Jul 1977 | A |
4319940 | Arrovo et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4406914 | Kincaid | Sep 1983 | A |
4487992 | Tomita | Dec 1984 | A |
4500748 | Klein | Feb 1985 | A |
4595793 | Arrovo et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605818 | Arrovo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4647714 | Goto | Mar 1987 | A |
4697051 | Beggs et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4767891 | Biegon et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777325 | Siwinski | Oct 1988 | A |
4788088 | Kohl | Nov 1988 | A |
4800236 | Lemke | Jan 1989 | A |
4912283 | O'Connor | Mar 1990 | A |
5037999 | VanDeusen | Aug 1991 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5173961 | Chiasson | Dec 1992 | A |
5253317 | Allen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5298680 | Kenny | Mar 1994 | A |
5393933 | Goertz | Feb 1995 | A |
5399813 | McNeill et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5424491 | Walling | Jun 1995 | A |
5493071 | Newmover | Feb 1996 | A |
5514837 | Kenny et al. | May 1996 | A |
5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5900588 | Springer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6037546 | Mottine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6194663 | Friesen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255593 | Reede | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288340 | Arnould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6462268 | Hazy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6570095 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
20020096358 | Kazuhiro et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030106704 | Isley et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040050578 | Martin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118593 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
697378 | Dec 1940 | DE |
90 11 484 | Oct 1990 | DE |
1 085 530 | Mar 2001 | EP |
694100 | Nov 1930 | FR |
WO 200051142 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 200154142 | Jul 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030217863 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09853512 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10336535 | US | |
Parent | 09257844 | Feb 1999 | US |
Child | 09853512 | US |