Some inkjet printhead assemblies include several parts joined together with adhesives. Passages formed in the parts provide pathways for ink to flow from the ink reservoir to the printhead.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures.
Air defects in the adhesive joints surrounding ink flow passages in multi-part printhead assemblies can adversely affect the quality and performance of the printhead assembly. Air defects in this type of joint exist as shallow pockets, partial bubbles or voids in the adhesive at the interface between the adhesive and the surface of the parts. Air defects in adhesive joints along the ink flow path can cause persistent color mixing in cases where the defects create a pathway between neighboring ink passages, and failed printer start-ups and early printhead de-priming in cases where the defects form an air path from the ink passages to the atmosphere. Air defects may also reduce joint strength by decreasing the surface area between the adhesive and the parts, and shorten joint life by creating more and shorter paths for ink to move into and attack the adhesive.
A new multi-part ink flow structure has been developed for an inkjet printhead assembly to reduce air defects in the adhesive joint(s) between parts. In one example of the new flow structure, the opening to each flow conduit transitions along a curve from a smaller interior part of the opening to a larger exterior part of the opening that forms at least part of the bonding surface. The curved bonding surfaces on each part are symmetrical across the joint and substantially free of discontinuities that might impede or trap air in the flow of adhesive. As described in detail below, the new flow structure interrupts or eliminates the primary mechanisms that cause air defects in the adhesive joint, and thus reduces the presence of air defects and their adverse effects on the quality and performance of the printhead assembly.
Although examples of the new flow structure will be described with reference to an inkjet printhead assembly with detachable ink containers, examples are not limited to such printhead assemblies or to inkjet printers or even inkjet printing. Examples of the new flow structure might also be implemented in other types of printhead assemblies, in ink cartridges with an integral printhead, and in other types of fluid flow devices. The examples shown in the figures and described below, therefore, illustrate but do not limit the invention, which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
As used in this document, a “printhead” means that part of an inkjet printer or other inkjet type dispenser that dispenses liquid from one or more openings, for example as drops or streams.
In the example of a printhead assembly 10 shown in
Referring now also to the exploded views of ink flow structure 12 shown in
As best seen in
Referring to
One mechanism that creates air defects in the adhesive joint is entraining and trapping air in the flow of adhesive as the joint is assembled. Testing indicates that air can be entrained when adhesive is forced past a discontinuity in the surfaces of the joint or when air is trapped between two or more converging adhesive flow fronts. The risk of both scenarios increases with increases in the lateral flow of the adhesive. Curved bonding surfaces 96 are substantially free of corners, edges, voids or other discontinuities that might impede the outward flow of adhesive and trap air along surfaces 96. Also, in the example shown, the curvature and arc length of bonding surfaces 96 are constant all around openings 88 and symmetrical on each part across the joint. This constancy around the openings 88 and symmetry across the joint helps all regions of the adhesive bead flow laterally equal distances as the parts are assembled to avoid converging flow fronts and trapping air.
A second mechanism that causes air defects in the adhesive joint is movement of the parts away from one another as the adhesive cures. When the bonding surfaces move away from one another, the adhesive will resist de-wetting the bonding surfaces and will instead move with those surfaces, causing the normally bulged out convex profile 104 to retract toward a concave profile 106 shown in
A third mechanism that causes air defects in the adhesive joint is over compression of the joint during assembly, which can occur in automated assembly processes tuned to accommodate the range of variation in part and fixture dimensions. Over compression causes the adhesive to flow and wet additional surface areas along the inner and outer edges of the joint. When the joint relaxes the adhesive resists de-wetting these areas, similar to when the parts move during adhesive cure as described above. Opposed curved bonding surfaces 96 at the inside of joints 84, 86 provide a non-linear relationship between joint fill volume and inward displacement of adhesive. It has been discovered that, rather than the constant increase in inward displacement for every unit increase in adhesive fill volume seen in straight, parallel bonding surfaces, the inward displacement of the adhesive actually decreases as the volume of the adhesive in the joint increases. The unique shape of the opposed curved bonding surfaces creates a non-linear relationship between joint fill volume and the inward displacement of the adhesive. During over compression a larger volume of adhesive can bulge (convex profile 104 in
Finally, the inward displacement of adhesive actually decreases as the volume of the adhesive in the joint increases. This means that the reservoir 102 of later gelling adhesive can be used effectively to relieve stress caused by part movement, as described above, without occluding ink flow conduits 58, 66, 74.
Although the shape and size of transition curve 90 may vary depending on the particular flow structure, it is expected that a radius 90 of at least 0.5 mm will be suitable for the flow structure in an inkjet printhead assembly such as that shown in
As noted at the beginning of this Description, the examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the invention. Other examples are possible. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined in the following claims.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/648,071 filed May 28, 2015, which is itself a 35 U.S.C. 371 national stage filing of international application serial no. PCT/U.S. 2012/067539 filed Dec. 3, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6193362 | Nakata et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6290340 | Kitahara et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6751581 | Ondrus et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7311272 | Ito | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7401897 | Ito | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7442317 | Silverbrook | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7527347 | Mukai | May 2009 | B2 |
7798613 | Silverbrook | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7926916 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
9440441 | Donning | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20060221139 | Mukai | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060283974 | Eguchi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070279453 | DeKegelaer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100134561 | Sugahara | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1149535 | May 1997 | CN |
1324302 | Nov 2001 | CN |
1568259 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1623787 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1880079 | Dec 2006 | CN |
102673152 | Sep 2012 | CN |
0495663 | Jul 1992 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160332444 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14648071 | US | |
Child | 15217390 | US |