The present disclosure relates in general to signal processing systems, and more particularly, to multiple path signal processing systems.
The use of multipath analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and analog front ends (AFEs) (e.g., two or more path ADCs/AFEs) in electrical circuits is known. Example multipath ADCs and AFEs and use of them in multiple electrical circuit paths are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,956 entitled “Process and System for the Analog-to-Digital Conversion of Signals” to Jahne et al. (“Jahne patent”), U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,317 entitled “Apparatus for the Conversion of Analog Audio Signals to a Digital Data Stream” to Knoth et al. (“Knoth patent”) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,780 entitled “Gain Ranging Analog-to-Digital Converter with Error Correction” to Gong et al. (“Gong patent”). The use of multipath circuits may reduce noise as one path may be optimized for processing small amplitude signals (e.g., for processing low noise signals) while another circuit path with another set of ADC and AFE is optimized for large amplitude signals (e.g., allowing for higher dynamic range).
An example application for multipath ADCs/AFEs is use of it in a circuit for an audio system application, such as an audio mixing board or in a digital microphone system. Such an example application is disclosed in the Jahne patent. In designing a circuit with multipath ADCs/AFEs that are used in respective multiple circuit paths, a tradeoff may exist between allowing larger signal swing (e.g., to allow swing of a signal between larger scale amplitudes) and low noise. Furthermore, the multipath ADCs/AFEs may provide high dynamic range signal digitization, with higher dynamic range for a given input power, and lower overall area than would be possible with conventional means. In other words, by allowing a separate optimization for each type of signal (e.g., large and small signals) that is provided each respective path, multipath ADCs/AFEs allow the overall circuit to burn less power, consume less area, and save on other such design costs.
Despite their advantages, existing multipath ADC/AFE approaches have disadvantages and problems. For example, many existing approaches have disadvantages related to transitioning and switching between the multiple paths, as such switching may not be smooth, leading to undesirable signal artifacts, especially in audio applications in which such artifacts may be perceptible to a listener of an audio device. As another example, a trend in electric circuits is to scale circuitry to the integrated circuit level. However, existing approaches to multipath AFEs/ADCs do not scale well to the integrated circuit level.
In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure, certain disadvantages and problems associated with implementation of multiple AFE/ADC paths may be reduced or eliminated.
In accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure, a processing system comprising may include a plurality of processing paths and a filter. The plurality of processing paths may include a first processing path and a second processing path, wherein the first processing path is configured to generate a first digital signal based on an analog input signal and the second processing path is configured to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal. The filter may have a corner frequency and may be configured to generate a filtered digital output signal combining spectral components of the first digital signal lower than the corner frequency and spectral components of the second digital signal higher than the corner frequency to generate a filtered digital signal.
In accordance with these and other embodiments of the present disclosure, a method may include processing an analog input signal with a first processing path to generate a first digital signal based on the analog input signal, processing the analog input signal with a second processing path to generate a second digital signal based on the analog input signal, and generating, with a filter having a corner frequency, a filtered digital output signal combining spectral components of the first digital signal lower than the corner frequency and spectral components of the second digital signal higher than the corner frequency to generate a filtered digital signal.
Technical advantages of the present disclosure may be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the figures, description and claims included herein. The objects and advantages of the embodiments will be realized and achieved at least by the elements, features, and combinations particularly pointed out in the claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory examples and are not restrictive of the claims set forth in this disclosure.
A more complete understanding of the present embodiments and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
Integrated circuit 105 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to process analog input signal ANALOG_IN to generate a digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT and condition digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT for transmission over a bus to digital processor 109. Once converted to digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, the signal may be transmitted over significantly longer distances without being susceptible to noise as compared to an analog transmission over the same distance. In some embodiments, integrated circuit 105 may be disposed in close proximity with analog signal source 101 to ensure that the length of the analog line between analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 is relatively short to minimize the amount of noise that can be picked up on an analog output line carrying analog input signal ANALOG_IN. For example, in some embodiments, analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 may be formed on the same substrate. In other embodiments, analog signal source 101 and integrated circuit 105 may be formed on different substrates packaged within the same integrated circuit package.
Digital processor 109 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to process a digital output signal for use in a digital system. For example, digital processor 109 may comprise a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor (DSP), application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or any other device configured to interpret and/or execute program instructions and/or process data, such as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
Signal processing system 100 may be used in any application in which it is desired to process an analog signal to generate a digital signal. Thus, in some embodiments, signal processing system 100 may be integral to an audio device that converts analog signals (e.g., from a microphone) to digital signals representing the sound incident on a microphone. As another example, signal processing system 100 may be integral to a radio-frequency device (e.g., a mobile telephone) to convert radio-frequency analog signals into digital signals.
An ADC 215 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to convert an analog signal received at its input, to a digital signal representative of analog input signal ANALOG_IN. ADC 215 may itself include one or more components (e.g., delta-sigma modulator, decimator, etc.) for carrying out the functionality of ADC 215. Selected components for the example embodiments of ADCs 215a and 215b are discussed in greater detail below with respect to
Filter 230 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to, based on a corner frequency of filter 230 control the relative contributions of the digital signals output by processing paths 201a and 201b to a digital output signal FILTER_OUT generated by filter 230. For example, as such corner frequency increases, the contribution of the digital signal output by processing path 201a may become less dominant in digital output signal FILTER_OUT while the contribution of the digital signal output by processing path 201b may become more dominant in digital output signal FILTER_OUT. Conversely, as such corner frequency decreases, the contribution of the digital signal output by processing path 201a may become more dominant in digital output signal FILTER_OUT while the contribution of the digital signal output by processing path 201b may become less dominant in digital output signal FILTER_OUT. Thus, filter 230 may effectively serve as a combined filter which low-pass filters the digital signal output by processing path 201b and high-pass filters the digital signal output by processing path 201a and combines the filtered digital signals to generate digital output signal FILTER_OUT such that digital output signal FILTER_OUT includes the spectral components of digital signal output by processing path 201b lower than the corner frequency and includes the spectral components of digital signal output by processing path 201a higher than the corner frequency. Example embodiments of filter 230 are described in greater detail below with respect to
Controller 220 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus for controlling a corner frequency of filter 230. In some embodiments, controller 220 may perform such control based on a magnitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a signal derivative thereof. For example, controller 220 may include an overload detector 221 that may determine whether or not a signal derivative of analog input signal ANALOG_IN (e.g., a signal generated within ADC 215a) is likely to cause clipping or other distortion of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT if a particular processing path (e.g., processing path 201a) is the dominant component of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. If clipping or other distortion of digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT is likely if the particular processing path (e.g., processing path 201a) is dominant, state machine 225 of controller 220 may generate a control signal to increase a corner frequency of filter 230 such that such processing path 201a becomes less dominant. To further illustrate, in some embodiments, processing path 201a may be a path adapted for low amplitudes of analog input signal ANALOG_IN and may thus have a high signal gain, while processing path 201b may be a path adapted for higher amplitudes of analog input signal ANALOG_IN and may thus have a lower signal gain. Thus, if analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a derivative thereof is greater than a threshold value indicative of a condition whereby digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT may experience clipping or other distortion if processing path 201a is dominant, overload detector 221 may detect such condition, and cause state machine 225 to generate a control signal to increase the corner frequency of filter 230 in order to make processing path 201a less dominant in digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
As another example, controller 220 may include a level detector 223 that may detect an amplitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a signal derivative thereof (e.g., a signal generated within ADC 215b) and communicate a signal indicative of such amplitude to state machine 225. Responsive to the signal received from level detector 223, state machine 225 may generate a control signal communicated to filter 230. To illustrate, as analog input signal ANALOG_IN decreases from a relatively high amplitude to a lower amplitude, it may cross a threshold amplitude level whereby controller 220 may decrease the corner frequency of filter 230, in order to make the output of processing path 201a more dominant in digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT and the output of processing path 201b less dominant in digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. In some embodiments, state machine 225 may wait for passage of a predetermined time after crossing of the threshold level before beginning to decrease the corner frequency. When decreasing the corner frequency, state machine 225 may do so continuously or in steps as the magnitude of the analog input signal decreases. Similarly, when below the threshold amplitude level, state machine 225 may cause the corner frequency to increase in response to increasing magnitude of the analog input signal.
Driver 219 may receive the filtered digital output signal FILTER_OUT generated by filter 230. Driver 219 may comprise any suitable system, device, or apparatus configured to condition such digital signal (e.g., encoding into Audio Engineering Society/European Broadcasting Union (AES/EBU), Sony/Philips Digital Interface Format (S/PDIF)), in the process generating conditioned digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT for transmission over a bus to digital processor 109. In
Also as shown in
Although AFEs 203a and 203b are described above having a non-inverting gain and an inverting gain, respectively, each of processing paths 201 may have approximately the same cumulative gain. Those of skill in the art may appreciate that simply applying a digital gain with a negative sign in either of ADC 215a or ADC 215b will negate the opposite polarities of the gains of AFEs 203.
As depicted in
In addition, ADC 215a may comprise a latency matching element 314 to match any signal latencies between processing path 201a and processing path 201b, while ADC 215b may comprise a phase matching element 320 to account for any phase offset between processing path 201a and processing path 201b. For example, phase matching element 320 may dynamically compensate for any phase mismatch between processing paths 201a and 201b by varying a delay of at least one of processing path 201a and processing path 201b. In some embodiments, phase matching element 320 may comprise a high-pass filter.
In some embodiments, a magnitude of a gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 may be substantially larger than (e.g., significantly more than manufacturing tolerances, one or more orders of magnitude) a magnitude of a gain of inverting amplifier 306. In addition, in these and other embodiments, a magnitude of digital gain element 310b may be substantially larger than (e.g., significantly more than manufacturing tolerances, one or more orders of magnitude) a magnitude of a gain of digital gain element 310a. Consequently, in such embodiments, a first path gain equal to the product of the magnitude of the gain of inverting amplifier 306 and the magnitude of a gain of digital gain element 310b may be substantially equal (e.g., within manufacturing tolerances) to a second path gain equal to the product of the magnitude of gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 and the gain of digital gain element 310a. As a specific example, in some embodiments, the inverting gain of inverting amplifier 306 may be approximately −6 decibels, the non-inverting gain of non-inverting amplifier 304 may be approximately 20 decibels, the gain of digital gain element 310a may be approximately −26 decibels, and the gain of digital gain element 310b may be approximately 0 decibels.
Accordingly, each processing path 201 may be adapted to process a particular amplitude of analog input signal ANALOG_IN. For example, AFE 203a may be suited to process lower signal amplitudes, as non-inverting amplifier 304 may have a practically infinite input resistance, may have a relatively low level of input-referred noise as compared to inverting amplifier 306, and its larger gain may permit effective processing of smaller signals, but characteristics of AFE 203a may not be amenable to higher amplitudes. The high input resistance of non-inverting amplifier 304 may facilitate the use of a smaller capacitor area for high-pass filter 302 (as compared to traditional approaches for implementing high-pass filters) and thus may permit integration of circuitry of high-pass filter 302 into the same integrated circuit as non-inverting amplifier 304, inverting amplifier 306, ADC 215a, and/or ADC 215b. In addition, the ability to integrate circuitry into a single integrated circuit may allow for centralized control of the stimuli for switching between processing paths 201 by controller 220, and may allow for more direct timing control of the actual switching and transitioning between processing paths 201. For example, because circuitry is integrated into a single integrated circuitry, level detector 223 may receive an output of delta-sigma modulator 308b as an input signal, rather than receiving an output of ADC 215b.
On the other hand, AFE 203b may be suited to process higher signal amplitudes, as its lower gain will reduce the likelihood of signal clipping, and may provide for greater dynamic range for analog input signal ANALOG_IN as compared to traditional approaches.
As described above with respect to
Despite a designer's best efforts to match the first path gain and the second path gain, process variations, temperature variations, manufacturing tolerances, and/or other variations may lead to the first path gain and the second path gain being unequal. If switching between paths occurs when such path gains are unequal, signal artifacts may occur due to an instantaneous, discontinuous change in magnitude of the digital output signal between two gain levels. For example, in audio signals, such artifacts may include human-perceptible “pops” or “clicks” in acoustic sounds generated from audio signals.
In some embodiments, in order to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of such artifacts when switching selection between the digital output signal of ADC 215a and the digital output signal of ADC 215b, and vice versa, controller 220 may program an additional gain into one or both of processing paths 201 to compensate for differences in the first path gain and second path gain. This additional gain factor may equalize the first path gain and the second path gain To illustrate, controller 220 may determine a scale factor indicative of the magnitude of difference (e.g., whether an intentional difference or unintentional mismatch) between the first path gain of processing path 201a and the second path gain of processing path 201b. The controller may determine the first path gain and the second path gain by comparing the digital output signals of each processing path to analog input signal ANALOG_IN or a derivative thereof. If such digital output signals have been filtered by a high-pass filter (e.g., high-pass filters 312), a direct-current offset between the signals may be effectively filtered out, which may be necessary to accurately compute the relative path gains. Controller 220 may determine the scale factor by calculating one of a root mean square average of the first path gain and the second path gain and a least mean squares estimate of the difference between the first path gain and the second path gain. Prior to switching selection between the first digital signal generated by ADC 215a and the second digital signal generated by ADC 215b (or vice versa), controller 220 may program an additional gain into one of processing paths 201 to compensate for the gain difference indicated by the scale factor. For example, controller 220 may calibrate one or both of the first path gain and the second path gain by applying a gain equal to the scale factor or the reciprocal of the gain factor (e.g., 1/gain factor), as appropriate. Such scaling may be performed by modifying one or both of digital gains 310. In some embodiments, controller 220 may apply the additional gain to the processing path 201 of the digital signal not selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT. For example, controller 220 may apply the additional gain to processing path 201a when the digital signal of ADC 215b is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT and apply the additional gain to processing path 201b when the digital signal of ADC 215a is selected as digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT.
In some embodiments, the additional gain, once applied to a path gain of a processing path 201, may be allowed over a period of time to approach or “leak” to a factor of 1, in order to constrain the additional gain and compensate for any cumulative (e.g., over multiple switching events between digital signals of ADCs 215) bias in the calculation of the additional gain. Without undertaking this step to allow the additional gain to leak to unity, multiple switching events between paths may cause the gain factor to increase or decrease in an unconstrained manner as such additional gain, if different than unity, affects the outputs of the multiple paths and thus affects the calculation of the scaling factor.
As shown in
A crossfader 327 may receive the digital output signal received from combiner 335 and the digital signal output by one of the processing paths (e.g., processing path 201b) and output filtered digital output signal FILTER_OUT comprising a weighted average of the digital output signal and the digital signal output by processing path 201b based on a control signal generated by and communicated from a controller 220. In some embodiments, crossfader 327 may not be present, in which case the digital output signal generated by combiner 335 may be communicated to driver 219 as filtered digital output signal FILTER_OUT.
In some embodiments, to reduce or eliminate artifacts from occurring when varying a corner frequency to adjust the relative dominance of processing paths 201 in digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT, controller 220 and crossfader 327 may be configured to transition, continuously or in steps, filtered digital output signal FILTER_OUT from a first digital signal (e.g., output of processing path 201b) to the digital output signal generated by combiner 335, or vice versa, such that during such transition, digital output signal DIGITAL_OUT is a weighted average of the first digital signal and the digital output signal. For example, for decreases in the magnitude of the analog input signal, crossfader 327 may transition from the first digital signal to the digital output signal generated by combiner 335 such that a weight of the digital output signal relative to the weight of the first digital signal increases during the transition. Similarly, for increases in the magnitude of the analog input signal, crossfader 327 may transition from the digital output signal generated by combiner 335 to the first digital signal such that a weight of the first digital signal relative to the weight of the digital output signal increases during the transition.
The presence of filter 230 (or 230A) may be advantageous so as to decrease a minimum time needed to switch between selection of processing paths 201 as the dominant processing path contributing to filtered digital output signal FILTER_OUT. For example, high-pass filters in each of processing paths 201 (e.g., high-pass filter 302 and phase matching element 320) may contribute to differences between processing paths 201, particularly in response to impulsive sound events in analog input signal ANALOG_IN. Due to such differences, and in the absence of filter 230 to frequency modulate between the paths, switching between processing paths 201 may lead to audio artifacts unless switching between paths is delayed. By including filter 230 in integrated circuit 105, such delay may be decreased over embodiments not having filter 230.
This disclosure encompasses all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Similarly, where appropriate, the appended claims encompass all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Moreover, reference in the appended claims to an apparatus or system or a component of an apparatus or system being adapted to, arranged to, capable of, configured to, enabled to, operable to, or operative to perform a particular function encompasses that apparatus, system, or component, whether or not it or that particular function is activated, turned on, or unlocked, as long as that apparatus, system, or component is so adapted, arranged, capable, configured, enabled, operable, or operative.
All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical objects to aid the reader in understanding the disclosure and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4446440 | Bell | May 1984 | A |
4972436 | Halim et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4999628 | Kakaubo et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4999830 | Agazzi | Mar 1991 | A |
5148167 | Ribner | Sep 1992 | A |
5321758 | Charpentier et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323159 | Imamura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5550923 | Hotvet | Aug 1996 | A |
5600317 | Knoth et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5714956 | Jahne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
2810477 | Abraham et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808575 | Himeno et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6088461 | Lin | Jul 2000 | A |
6201490 | Kawano et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6271780 | Gong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6353404 | Kuroiwa | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6745355 | Tamura | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768443 | Willis | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6822595 | Robinson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6853242 | Melanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888888 | Tu | May 2005 | B1 |
7020892 | Levesque et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023268 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7061312 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7167112 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216249 | Fujiwara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7403010 | Hertz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7440891 | Shozakai et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7522677 | Liang | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7583215 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7679538 | Tsang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7893856 | Ek et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8060663 | Murray et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8289425 | Kanbe | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8330631 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8362936 | Ledzius et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8717211 | Miao et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8873182 | Liao et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8952837 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9071267 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9071268 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9148164 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9306588 | Das et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9337795 | Das et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9391576 | Satoskar et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
20010009565 | Singvall | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20040184621 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050258989 | Li | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276359 | Xiong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060056491 | Lim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098827 | Paddock et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060284675 | Krochmal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070057720 | Hand et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092089 | Seefeldt et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103355 | Yamada | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120721 | Caduff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123184 | Nesimoglu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080030577 | Cleary et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080159444 | Terada | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090021643 | Hsueh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090058531 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084586 | Nielsen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090220110 | Bazarjani et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100183163 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110013733 | Martens et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025540 | Katsis | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063148 | Kolze et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110096370 | Okamoto | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110136455 | Sundstrom et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150240 | Akiyama | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170709 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110242614 | Okada | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120001786 | Hisch | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047535 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120133411 | Miao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120177201 | Ayling et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120177226 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188111 | Ledzius et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120207315 | Kimura | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242521 | Kinyua | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250893 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263090 | Porat et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280726 | Colombo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130106635 | Doi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130188808 | Pereira et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140105256 | Hanevich | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140184332 | Shi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140269118 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150214974 | Currivan | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150214975 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150295584 | Das et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150381130 | Das et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160072465 | Das et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080862 | He et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080865 | He et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160173112 | Das et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0966105 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1575164 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1753130 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1798852 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2207264 | Jul 2010 | EP |
1599401 | Sep 1981 | GB |
2119189 | Nov 1983 | GB |
2307121 | Jun 1997 | GB |
2507096 | Apr 2014 | GB |
2527637 | Dec 2015 | GB |
2008294803 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO0054403 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0237686 | May 2002 | WO |
2008067260 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2014113471 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2015160655 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016040165 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040171 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016040177 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thaden, Rainer et al., A Loudspeaker Management System with FIR/IRR Filtering; AES 32nd International Conference, Hillerod, Denmark, Sep. 21-23, 2007; pp. 1-12. |
Thaden, Rainer et al., A Loudspeaker Management System with FIR/IRR Filtering; Slides from a presentation given at the 32nd AES conference “DSP for Loudspeakers” in Hillerod, Denmark in Sep. 2007; http://www.four-audio.com/data/AES32/AES32FourAudio.pdf; 23 pages. |
GB Patent Application No. 1419651.3, Improved Analogue-to-Digital Convertor, filed Nov. 4, 2014, 65 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1506258.1, Oct. 21, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/025329, mailed Aug. 11, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/048633, mailed Dec. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/048591, mailed Dec. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1510578.6, Aug. 3, 2015, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2015/056357, mailed Jan. 29, 2015, 13 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1514512.1, Feb. 11, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2015/048609, mailed Mar. 23, 2016, 23 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/022578, mailed Jun. 22, 2016, 12 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB16005282, Jul. 7, 2016, 8 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1602288.1, Aug. 9, 2016, 6 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report, GB Application No. GB1603628.7, Aug. 24, 2016, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/EP2016/062862, mailed Aug. 26, 2016, 14 pages. |