The disclosure relates generally to electrical cables, particularly multi-phase cables.
Wire current rating typically takes into account several factors including: free air rating, altitude derating and bundle derating. Wires or conductors carrying alternating current may also take into account skin and proximity effects derating.
Free air rating of a wire may be related to the surface area of the wire and not necessarily the cross-sectional area. Thus, several wires having the an equivalent cross-sectional area as a larger wire may together have a higher combined free air rating than the larger wire, because their total surface is larger. However, as the number of wires in a bundle (e.g., in a multi-wire cable) increases, the cable rating may decrease. This may be because convection with free air may be only accomplished by the wires on the outer perimeter of the bundle. Thus, a cable may exhibit bundle derating, as the number of conductors in a bundle increases. Cable rating may also decrease with increasing altitude, as free air density decreases and convection cooling decreases.
For wires carrying alternating current, skin depth is inversely related to square root of current frequency. Skin depth refers to the tendency of alternating electric current to distribute itself with greater current density near the surface of the conductor and decreasing in density with increasing depth. As the frequency increases, the skin depth decreases. This phenomenon is known as the “skin effect”. At high enough frequencies, the interior of the conductor does not carry much current, which may result in relatively high ohmic losses.
Alternating currents of the same phase and frequency in adjacent insulated conductors arranged in a bundle also have an electromagnetic effect on each other. This effect, referred to as the “proximity effect”, tends to force the currents to flow on the surfaces of the outside conductors.
The combination of skin and proximity effects may reduce the usefulness of a cable to carry high-frequency currents at high amperage.
In some example aspects, the present disclosure provides a multi-phase cable, the cable comprising: a plurality of conductors for conducting currents of two or more different phases, each phase being associated with one or more conductors and each conductor being associated with one respective phase; each conductor having a cross-section with at least one dimension that is sized to decrease a skin effect of the conductor at a maximum or nominal operation frequency of the conductor; wherein the conductors are arranged to permit free air cooling of the cable on at least two sides of each conductor, and such that each conductor of a given phase has, as immediate neighbors, only conductors of one or more different phases.
Further details of these and other aspects of the subject matter of this application will be apparent from the detailed description and drawings included below.
Reference is now made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aspects of various example embodiments are described through reference to the drawings.
The present disclosure may help to increase the cable rating of multi-phase current-carrying cables. The present disclosure may also help to decrease undesirable effects caused by bundling wires together and/or by skin and/or proximity effects.
Reference is made to
The number of conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be unevenly distributed among different phases. For example, there may be a greater number of conductors 105a, 105b, 105c of one given phase than another phase.
The use of more than one conductor 105a, 105b, 105c for a given phase may be useful where the diameter of each conductor 105a, 105b, 105c is inversely related to the frequency of the conducted current, resulting in smaller conductors for higher frequencies. In such a case, the current of a given phase may be divided among multiple conductors 105a, 105b, 105c to carry the full load. Such an arrangement may be useful where the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may extend for a significant length parallel to each other in the cable 100 and where the skin effect and proximity effect may otherwise be significant.
Each conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be configured to have a cross-section with at least one dimension that is sized to decrease the skin effect at the maximum or nominal operation frequency of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c. Such a configuration may help to reduce ohmic losses arising from the skin effect by helping to ensure that current flows relatively uniformly throughout substantially the entire cross-section of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c.
For example, at least one dimension may be sized to be equal to or less than six times the skin depth of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c at the maximum or nominal operation frequency, which may be sufficient to achieve an ohmic loss ratio that is less than or equal to two. This may substantially decrease the skin effect in the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c, sufficient to cause a substantially performance improvement.
In the example of
For example, where the cross-section of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c is substantially circular, the diameter of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be selected to be less than or equal to twice the skin depth at the maximum frequency of operation. In another example, where the cross-section of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c is substantially rectangular, the smaller dimension (i.e., width) of the rectangular cross-section may be selected to be less than or equal to twice the skin depth at the maximum frequency of operation.
In some examples, all dimensions of the cross-section of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be sized to decrease the skin effect. For example, all dimensions of the cross-section of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be sized to be less than or equal to two times the skin depth of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c at the maximum or nominal operation frequency, such as a cross-section that is substantially square, with height and widths both being less than or equal to two times the skin depth of the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c at the maximum or nominal operation frequency.
In some examples, the cable 100 may be rated to operate at frequencies in the range of 60 Hz and lower to 1 MHz and possibly higher. For example, the cable 100 may be rated to operate at frequencies for which Litz wire may be used (e.g., at least up to 500 kHz).
In some examples, the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be rated for currents up to about 3.6 kHz which typically results in a skin depth of about 0.056 in. Thus, a conductor 105a, 105b, 105c having a substantially circular cross-section may be configured to have a cross-sectional diameter of about 0.112 in or less. For example, the conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be a 14 gauge wire, having a diameter of about 0.076 in. Similarly, a conductor 105a, 105b, 105c having a substantially rectangular cross-section may be configure to have a cross-sectional width of 0.112 in or less.
The cable 100 may be sized according to the application and to accommodate the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c. For example, where the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c are spaced farther apart from each other (e.g., to allow for better convection and cooling), the cable 100 may be wider.
Other cross-section geometries may be suitable for the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c including, for example, square, hexagonal, or any suitable regular or irregular geometries.
The size and/or shapes of the cross-section of individual conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be modified as appropriate to accommodate higher or lower frequency current (e.g., at lower frequencies, skin depth increases and the dimensions of the cross-section of individual conductors may be modified accordingly). Individual conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may have similar or dissimilar cross-sectional shapes and/or sizes, as appropriate.
The conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be arranged in a single layer in the cable 100. That is, the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be arranged side-by-side but not overlapping, such that the cable 100 may be substantially planar. This may be similar to a single-row ribbon cable, which have not been conventionally used for power transmission, in particular for high-frequency multi-phase current.
Such a configuration may help to increase convection, since each conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may be cooled by free air from at least two directions. This may help to improve the bundle derating factor. This substantially planar arrangement of conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may improve the current rating relative to if the same conductors 105a, 105b, 105c were arranged in a bundle.
For example, a single conductor in free air would be cooled all about its perimeter (equal to about 2 πrl, where r is the radius of a the circular cross-section of the conductor and l is the length of the conductor). A single conductor located away from the perimeter of a bundle, which is the case for most conductors in a bundle cable, would experience no free air cooling (equal to about 0). A single conductor 105a, 105b, 105c in the cable 100 would have free air cooling from at least two sides of the cable (equal to about 4rl). The ratio of cooling, compared to free air cooling of a single conductor, is thus about 0 for a conductor in a bundle cable, and about 4r/2 πr=0.6366 in the arrangement of the disclosed cable 100.
Where one current phase is conducted by two or more conductors 105a, 105b, 105c the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be arranged such that each conductor 105a, 105b, 105c of a given phase has, as immediate neighbors, only conductors 105a, 105b, 105c of one or more different phases. For example, a conductor 105a, conducting current at phase A may have as immediate neighbors only conductors 105b, 105c conducting currents at phase B and C. By having no two conductors 105a, 105b, 105c of the same phase directly adjacent to one another, this may help to reduce the proximity effect. This may help to further reduce ohmic losses, which may allow the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c (and thus the cable 100) to operate at higher currents. Because the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c are arranged in a single layer side-by-side arrangement, each conductor 105a, 105b, 105c may have at most two immediate neighbors. This lower number of immediate neighbors may help to reduce skin and/or proximity effects.
The cable 100 may be made of any suitable materials. For example, the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c may be made of any suitable conductive material including, for example, copper. The cable and conductor insulators 110, 115 may be made of any suitable insulating material including. The material for the conductors 105a, 105b, 105c and the cable and conductor insulators 110, 115 may be selected to accommodate high frequency (e.g., 400 Hz or higher) and/or high temperature (e.g., up to 200° C. or higher) use. The thickness of the cable and conductor insulators 110, 115 may also be selected to suit the application. For example, for high temperature (e.g., up to 200° C. or higher) and/or high voltage use, the conductor insulators 115 may be about 0.010 in thick.
The combination of the disclosed conductor geometries and arrangements may help to increase the rating of a multiphase cable with less conductive material. This improvement in rating may translate into size, weight (e.g., up to 50% reduction or more) and/or cost reduction of multi-phase cables and connectors.
For example, a “derating factor” for a cable may be defined as the direct current (DC) ohmic loss of the cable divided by the alternating current (AC) ohmic loss of the cable at its highest rated frequency. A higher derating factor may indicate better rating for a cable. For example, a bundle of 54 conductors is expected to have a derating factor of about 0.26. Example calculations and simulations have shown that a bundle cable of 54 conductors as arranged in U.S. patent application publication no. 2008/0179969, for example, may be expected to have a derating factor of about 0.564. In comparison, calculations and simulations have shown that the example cable of
The present disclosure may allow for reduction in alternating current ohmic losses while keeping the weight and/or size of the cable relatively low. In weight sensitive applications, such airborne equipment, this may be useful. Lower weight cables may also allow for more packaging and/or transportation options.
The present disclosure may also provide a multi-phase cable that is relatively simple to design and/or manufacturing. The disclosed cable may be manufactured using suitable wire and ribbon manufacturing techniques (e.g., by a ribbon cable manufacturer) that may not need expensive weaving machines. This may translate into reduced cost of the cables.
A high-frequency multi-phase ribbon cable, in an example of the present disclosure, may be rated to more than 90% of the direct current rating of a ribbon cable having similar dimensions and configuration.
A multi-phase cable incorporating this arrangement of conductors may be useful in various applications to conduct high frequency multi-phase currents. For example, such a cable may be used in engines, high speed motors and high speed generators. The present disclosure may be useful in any application where multi-phase current, including high-frequency current, is conducted, or any application where skin depth may be a concern. For example, the present disclosure may be useful for high-frequency transmission. The present disclosure may also be useful in low-frequency (e.g., 60 Hz or lower) applications.
The present disclosure may differ from other multi-phase cables in various ways. For example, typical non-insulated stranded cables may ignore the skin and proximity effects and may deal with the excess heat generated by either cooling the conductors or letting the cables run hot. In both cases, there may be significant wasted energy, and in the second case, the life of the insulation of the cable may be reduced by the heat.
In some other multi-phase cables, the skin and proximity effects may be dealt with by making the conductors larger and hollow, with the conducting material only as thick as the skin depth. However, the conductors tend to have much larger diameters and are much bulkier, which may limit the types of application for the cable.
Another multi-phase cable is a Litz wire. Litz wire may aim to reduce the impact of the skin and proximity effects by weaving precise patterns with the insulated conductive strands in such a way that each strand resides for small intervals on the outside of the bundle and for small intervals on the inside of the bundle. This may allow the interior of the bundle to contribute to the conduction, such that each strand may have the same average resistance as all the others. Disadvantages of Litz wire include the high cost, the complexity of the weaving procedure, and the added weight and length of conductors due to the weaving pattern.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, the conductors may have any suitable dimensions and/or cross-sectional geometries, and may be arranged in any suitable configuration. Any suitable conductive material may be used for the conductors, and any suitable insulating material may be used for the insulators. The cable may be configured to accommodate any number of phases. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/685,847 filed on Nov. 27, 2012, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977787 | Wodtke | Oct 1934 | A |
3448204 | Perrone | Jun 1969 | A |
3621118 | Bunish | Nov 1971 | A |
3720778 | Woertz | Mar 1973 | A |
3828120 | Hansen | Aug 1974 | A |
4023887 | Speers | May 1977 | A |
4095042 | Ross | Jun 1978 | A |
4281212 | Bogese, II | Jul 1981 | A |
4652772 | Shephard | Mar 1987 | A |
4783579 | Brandolf | Nov 1988 | A |
4835650 | Epstein | May 1989 | A |
4857675 | Marancik | Aug 1989 | A |
5053583 | Miller | Oct 1991 | A |
7554780 | Wada | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7807927 | Yeh | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8987599 | Reuss | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9391380 | Little | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20030214196 | Cai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20080173464 | Nair | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179969 | Dooley et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20110006055 | Diehl | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20130225005 | Fornage | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140144671 | Shenouda | May 2014 | A1 |
20150300534 | Leininger | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Response to Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Advisory Action dated Mar. 25, 2015 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Response to Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Further Response to Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 filed on Apr. 2, 2015 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2015 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2015 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Apr. 18, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Response to Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Supplementary Response to Office Action and Summary of Interview filed on Apr. 26, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Response to Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2016 re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,847. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180261357 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13685847 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 15978666 | US |