Patent Grant
9352527
The present invention relates to the field of sheets of absorbent paper made of fibrous material such as tissue, comprising at least three plies, preferably five or more.
The preferred application of the invention is that of paper for sanitary or domestic or even cosmetic use, such as bathroom tissue, but also kitchen towel, paper handkerchiefs or alternatively the “formats” that can be used for cleansing the skin and/or removing makeup.
In general, this type of product needs to display a certain number of characteristics such as softness, flexibility, dry and/or wet strength, absorption, thickness, and also disintegratability, etc.
One or more others of these parameters will take precedence depending on the anticipated application, and known products thus display either good softness or excellent absorption, or perfect strength, etc.
Furthermore, the visual appearance is also a parameter that needs to be taken into consideration: the esthetic look of known absorbent products can be achieved by embossing the sheet or alternatively by printing patterns using ink, these patterns varying in their visibility and harmonious, or alternatively by combining both techniques.
Where toilet paper is concerned, the objective will be to obtain good strength, a certain thickness and great softness. The strength and softness may seem difficult to reconcile but by combining certain fibers and or certain basis weights with a treatment such as calendering, good results can be obtained.
However, the known products do not exhibit all the desired characteristics listed above; a choice is therefore generally made, leading to a product that displays one or two of the above listed technical characteristics.
It is an object of the present invention simultaneously to achieve good performance across all of the characteristics.
One approach which may appear simple and obvious is to associate a great number of plies to form a very thick absorbent sheet. This approach has hitherto remained a theoretical one because technical problems occur when attempts to associate four or more plies are made: either it is necessary to provide several adhesive application stations, or it is necessary to provide mechanical association means that entail a strong pressure on each of the plies of which the sheet is formed.
The adhesive application stations each lead to problems of soiling, maintenance, floor space on the manufacturing line, etc., leading to additional costs and/or complications in the manufacture.
On the other hand, excessively high pressures lead to premature wear of the manufacturing rollers or cylinders, crush the embossed patterns and/or lead to vibrations which prove to be detrimental not only to the cylinders themselves but which also have a negative effect on the quality and reliability of the sheets produced.
Patent application WO 97/20107 describes a sheet of multi-ply absorbent paper in which the plies are associated in the converting phase using a method known as “dry marking” which consists in deforming the sheet through its thickness under stress by passing it between an engraved roller with a rigid external surface and a smooth roller, the external surface of which is less hard than that of the engraved roller.
This then yields a multi-ply product where the plies are associated purely mechanically, and which is marked in certain regions.
Furthermore, sheets of absorbent paper which are very thick and/or used simultaneously in excessive quantity may lead to blocked pipes.
However, there is a need, particularly although not exclusively as far as bathroom tissue is concerned, for a paper that is at once thicker, strong, soft, flexible, absorbent and disintegrates readily.
Indeed, with a paper that displays all of these characteristics, the user can use just one format (or sheet) at a time, that is to say for each wipe, hence making not insignificant savings when it is borne in mind that with known bathroom tissue, several (four or five) sheets are commonly employed by the consumers on each use.
Thus, by using fewer sheets each time, the risk of blockages in the pipes is greatly reduced.
The present invention proposes a solution which is unobvious, simple, reliable and can be adapted to suit several types of production.
Bathroom tissue is a preferred application of the invention but the invention can also be used for other products such as formats for cleaning, removing makeup or other skincare applications, and as kitchen towel, paper handkerchiefs, etc.
A subject of the present invention is a substantially rectangular multi-ply disintegrable absorbent sheet based on tissue and comprising at least three plies.
Furthermore, the sheet has a coefficient KNOVE=RSM×RST×A×G×e(12×(E+Ep))×(1/e(Sp))>75 000 where
RST=strength in the cross direction of the sheet, in N/m
RSM=strength in the machine direction of the sheet, in N/m
G=basis weight of the sheet in kg/m2
E=thickness of the sheet in mm
Sp=flexibility of the sheet in N
A=absorption of the sheet in kg/m2
EP=mean thickness of one ply of the sheet in mm, EP being greater than 0.115 mm.
According to another feature, the absorbent sheet also has a coefficient KD=KNOVE×e(D)>100 000, D being a softness value ranging between −3 and +3.0.
Notable softness is thus obtained according to the invention for a sheet which is also both thick and flexible.
According to the invention, the absorbent sheet has a tensile strength in the machine direction greater than about 400 N/m, preferably ranging between 400 and 1000 N/m, preferentially higher than 700 N/m.
Preferentially, the sheet has a tensile strength in the cross direction ranging between about 200 N/m and about 500 N/m, preferentially higher than 300 N/m.
Thus, such an absorbent sheet simultaneously displays properties of softness, thickness and exceptional tensile strength both in the machine and in the cross directions.
Particularly, the sheet may comprise between 3 and 12 plies, preferentially between 3 and 9 plies; it being possible for each ply itself to comprise a group of plies.
Advantageously, the sheet may have a thickness greater than about 0.75 mm and less than about 1.5 mm.
This thickness encourages the user to use a small number of sheets, preferably just one, each time.
Particularly, the basis weight of the sheets according to the invention is greater than or equal to about 70 g/m2 and preferentially less than 150 g/m2.
The sheets may have a length of about 140 mm and a width of about 110 mm, particularly for uses as bathroom tissue.
A format such as this is somewhat larger than the format of known sheets, hence yet again discouraging the use of several sheets at a time.
Furthermore, in the context of its use as bathroom tissue, the rolls according to the invention may comprise between 60 and 120 sheets, which is markedly fewer than conventional rolls of toilet paper. Of course, given the intrinsic characteristics of each sheet, this does not cause the user to bear an additional cost because one of the significant advantages of the invention lies in the use of just one sheet instead of three, four or even more each time.
This then yields a significant financial saving, which is very much liked and appreciated by consumers.
Furthermore, in spite of the great thickness of the sheets, rolls can be formed without any problems. This is made possible by the intrinsic characteristics of the sheets according to the invention which simultaneously display remarkable elasticity and remarkable flexibility which are both entirely compatible with rolling, even at the center of the roll where the radii of curvature are the smallest.
Furthermore, another subject of the invention is a process for manufacturing disintegratable absorbent sheets which consists in embossing at least three of the plies that form said sheet separately and differently, in chemically associating said sheets using a single adhesive-coating unit then in mechanically associating the collection of plies using a press cylinder.
Without departing from the scope of the invention, the manufacturing process may consist, in the wet phase, in throwing a suspension of papermaking fibers onto a fabric in order to form a web, in transferring this web to the surface of a porous drying cylinder, in making jets of air from said cylinder to pass through the web, then in transferring the dry web thus formed onto a creping cylinder. Several plies are thus formed independently of one another and then, later, in the so-called dry phase, said plies are associated with one another by mechanical deformation.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, at least one of the external surfaces of the sheet is obtained using this process.
With these processes, the minimum specific pressure for associating the plies is of the order of 3 kg/mm2.
The invention is also aimed at a multi-ply disintegratable absorbent sheet comprising plies obtained by one of the processes described above and/or plies obtained by the other of the aforementioned processes.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter, which is regarded as the invention, is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the invention, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
According to
According to one of the embodiments of the invention, each ply or group of plies is embossed independently (as will be explained in greater detail in relation to
By way of illustration, the first ply (or group of plies) 1 may be an outer ply, embossed with a so-called decorative pattern; the second ply 2 (or group of plies) is positioned on the inside of the sheet and comprises coarse microembossing; the expression “coarse microembossing” must be understood for example to mean microembossing comprising approximately 25 protrusions per cm2. This ply confers and gives the sheet thickness and a certain stiffness and good mechanical integrity.
The third ply 3 (or group of plies) forms the second external surface of the sheet and may advantageously have microembossing, that is to say embossing comprising at least 30 protrusions per cm2.
The third ply thus makes it possible to limit the two sided effect, that is to say the visible trace of the embossing of the first ply on the third ply, and above all avoids there being a sensation that is unpleasant to the touch.
Each ply may or may not have the same nature.
The expression “group of plies” means that each of said first, second and/or third aforementioned plies may in fact consist of one or several plies.
Furthermore, the plies 1, 2, 3 are glued together at dots and/or lines of glue 4. The nature of the glue and its dilution ratio are known per se and can be readily determined by the person skilled in the art as part of his everyday know how.
Advantageously, the glue is deposited on one of the internal surfaces of the sheet as can be seen in
Thus, each of the plies 1, 2, 3 is embossed in a way known per se between an engraved steel cylinder 51, 61, 71 and a rubber cylinder 52, 62, 72.
Each of the plies was wet laid beforehand using the technology well known to those skilled in the art of the CWP (conventional wet press) type.
By way of illustration, the first ply 1 is embossed in a nip 5 between the first engraved cylinder 51 and the first smooth cylinder 52, the engraving of the first cylinder 51 being such that a somewhat decorative embossing pattern (patterns) is produced on the first ply 1 (or group of plies) which will constitute one of the external surfaces of the sheet.
The other external surface of the sheet consists of the third ply 3 (or group of plies) which is embossed in a nip 7 between the third engraved cylinder 71 and the third smooth cylinder 72. The engraving of the third engraved cylinder 71 is such that microembossing is for example formed on the third ply (or group of plies) 3. In the conventional way, microembossing is defined by a protrusion density greater than or equal to 30 per cm2.
Furthermore, the second ply 2 (or group of plies) is inserted between the first and third ply.
The second ply is embossed between the second embossing cylinder 61 and the second smooth cylinder 62 at a second nip 6.
Preferentially, the embossing obtained is coarse microembossing as already mentioned hereinabove.
Once embossed, the second ply 2 is directed towards an adhesive-coating unit 8 known per se which essentially comprises a doctor cylinder 82 and an applicator cylinder 81.
The adhesive-coating unit 8 is preferentially positioned under the first engraved cylinder 51 so that the applicator cylinder 81 collaborates with the first engraved cylinder 51 at a nip 10.
More specifically, the applicator cylinder 81 bears against the engraved cylinder 51 via the second ply 2 and the first ply 1 superposed. The plunger cylinder 82 transfers the adhesive from the glue reserve of the unit 8 to the applicator cylinder 81. The applicator cylinder 81 exerts a certain pressure on the engraved cylinder 51 at the distal surface of the protrusions of the first embossed ply 1. With sufficient pressure, the glue passes through the second ply 2 and the association of plies 1 and 2 is thereby improved.
In an embodiment variant, the glue applicator cylinder 81 may have an engraved surface with a view to applying glue only to part of the tops of the engravings. By reducing the area coated with glue it is thus possible to improve the flexibility of the end product.
The adhesive 4 used may be a standard glue of the PVA type or of the hot melt type. By way of example, use was made of a glue marketed by the company Swift. This glue was diluted in water in optimum proportions to obtain appropriate transfer to the plies.
In another embodiment, appropriate means are used to spray a hot melt adhesive to each of the faces of the second ply. In this case, the adhesive needs to be applied before the ply 2 comes into contact with the other two plies.
According to yet another embodiment, an aqueous adhesive is applied by spraying onto the central ply 2.
Having passed through the nip 10, that is to say once they have been associated with one another, the plies 1 and 2 are associated with the third embossed ply 3.
The plies pass first of all (in the direction of the arrow 11) between the first engraved cylinder 51 and the third engraved cylinder 71 and then are associated at a nip 12 via spots of glue 4 by virtue of a marrying cylinder 9 which collaborates with the first engraved cylinder 51.
This association is performed between the marrying cylinder 9, which is less hard than the first embossing cylinder 51, at a specific pressure of the order of 10 kg/mm2.
It should be pointed out that, according to the invention embodiment just described, the at least three plies (or group of plies) that form the sheet have each undergone a different deformation during the transformation or converting phase.
This characteristic introduces both body, gentleness and an harmonious look to each sheet.
Without departing from the scope of the invention, the plies may be associated by knurling them between (hard) engraved knurling wheels and smooth cylinders which are less hard. Deformation by knurling is of a mechanical type but then affects only strips of greater or lesser width on the plies.
In general, association by knurling is not as good as association by embossing and/or adhesive and the impression of relief defined by a knurling operation is not as visible as it is when the association is done by embossing and/or adhesive.
By way of illustration, U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,224 discloses a conventional knurling process.
In accordance with the invention, association of the plies may be performed by a so-called “dry marking” technique for example according to the teachings of patent EP 864 014 B1: in this known method, the plies that are to be associated are passed in turn between a substantially elastic receiving first cylinder and an engraved cylinder and then between this same cylinder and a substantially elastic fixed second cylinder; since the receiving first cylinder and the engraved cylinder are able to move and the elastic second cylinder is fixed, the association of plies obtained is such that the sheet exhibits a smooth face and a face of reduced thickness bearing impressed patterns.
The particular feature of the process according to the invention is the ability to associate at least three plies or groups of plies. More specifically, the total number of plies may be N=n+m+p; n, m, p each being an integer number, preferentially and nonlimitingly ranging between 1 and 3. Favorable results have been achieved with rolls produced using sheets comprising between 3 and 12 plies.
According to the invention, the plies are advantageously associated using a single deposition of glue, when each of the plies is obtained by a wet lay technique of the CWP type.
Another advantageous feature of the invention lies in the fact that the absorbent sheet can disintegrate, that is to say readily breaks up in water, in spite of the high number of plies of which it is formed. The distintegratability (disintegration) within the meaning of the invention is, in particular, that defined by French standard NF Q 34-020. This standard applies to items for sanitary and domestic use, particularly bathroom tissue and relates to how readily such products disintegrate.
According to a notable feature of the invention, the absorbent sheets have a coefficient KNOVE=RSM×RST×A×G×e(12×(E+Ep))×(1/e(Sp))>75 000 where
RST=tensile strength of the sheet in the cross direction of the sheet, in N/m
RSM=tensile strength of the sheet in the machine direction of the sheet, in N/m
G=basis weight of the sheet in kg/m2
E=thickness of the sheet in mm
Sp=flexibility of the sheet in N
A=absorption of the sheet in kg/m2
EP=mean thickness of one ply of the sheet in mm, EP being greater than 0.115 mm.
All the sheets the characteristics of which meet this technical definition simultaneously display thickness, softness and good strength. It is entirely unexpected for these characteristics to be found simultaneously in an absorbent sheet that disintegrates readily.
This is why the conceivable applications of the invention are numerous and varied: bathroom tissue, kitchen towel, cleaning product, makeup remover.
The “tensile strength” or, more specifically, the “resistance to break by tensile” defined in the standard NF EN 12625-4 part 4 is the maximum tensile force withstood per unit width by a specimen of tissue paper or tissue product until it breaks, in a tensile test. The principle of this test is that a specimen 50 mm wide and at least 150 mm long is stretched to breaking point at a constant rate of elongation of 50 mm/min.
To do this, the specimens to be evaluated are placed in turn between two jaws of a tester (as defined precisely in the standard EN 12625-4): at least 20 specimens are subjected to the test.
The jaws of the tester separate from one another at a constant rate of about 50 mm/min and all the significant values of the forces upon breakage of the specimens are recorded.
Next, the mean of said breaking forces: F (expressed in N) is calculated in order to determine the mean tensile strength Fm expressed in N/m such that:
where wi=the initial width of the specimen (normally 50 mm).
As far as the flexibility Sp of the sheet is concerned, this being expressed in N, this is determined by a so-called “ring and rod” method which consists in passing the sheet of surface area S through a hole of a diameter slightly greater than the large diameter of a cone frustum that the sheet will wrap around. The tensile force on the sheet before and during its passage through the hole is measured and plotted on a graph on which the movement of the test cage is plotted on the abscissa axis (in mm) and the tensile force is plotted on the ordinate axis (in N). As the sheet passes through the hole, the gradient of the curve changes and the magnitude of the force at the point of inflection is noted. This value is representative of the flexibility Sp (in N) of said sheet because it is inversely proportional to said force.
The Sp flexibility of a test sample is measured using a test cage, cone (frustum) and rod as illustrated in
E is the measured thickness of the sheet obtained in accordance with European standard EN 12625-3 while Ep is the mean thickness of a ply of said sheet. More specifically, Ep is the total thickness of the sheet divided by the number of plies of which the sheet is formed; here considered to be greater than 0.115 mm.
A is the absorption of the sheet, in kg per m2, that is to say the mass of liquid absorbed per unit area of the sheet. This parameter is determined on the basis of the conditions set out in the standard EN 12625-8 in that the absorption is thus measured in grams of liquid per gram of paper and if the basis weight of the paper is also known (as a weight per unit area), then multiplying these values together leads to an absorption in weight per unit area, as given in the table which follows.
Furthermore, as far as its softness is concerned, the absorbent product according to the invention can be characterized by a coefficient KD=KNOVE×c(D)>100 000, D being a number ranging between −3 and +3 and obtained according to the following test:
The individual testing the product chooses an adjective to describe the softness on a verbal scale. The method consists in allocating marks on this verbal scale according to the following look-up table, comparing each of the test sheets against the same control 0:
Verbal Scale/Score
Far less soft: −3
Less soft: −2
Probably less soft: −1
Not different: 0
Probably softer: +1
Softer: +2
Much softer: +3
The number of individuals who have chosen a given softness adjective is then multiplied by the score corresponding to that adjective. Then the points obtained are summed and divided by the total number of individuals in order to obtain an average score. This average score D, which lies between −3 and +3, gives the result of the test for a given product.
The table which follows gives values for various types of sheet obtained according to the invention, and for various known products.
This table clearly reveals that the invention, particularly through the predefined coefficients KNOVE and KD, differs from the prior art. The invention makes it possible simultaneously to improve the strength of the product, its thickness and its softness.
Furthermore, the sheets according to the invention are rectangular or substantially rectangular and have a tensile strength greater than about 700 N/m in their machine direction and at the same time greater than about 300 N/m in their cross direction.
These values can be considered to be high by comparison with known values: the 4-ply bathroom tissue marketed in Germany under the trade name “Servus” by Kimberly-Clark and which has a machine direction strength of 605 N/m is, for example, known. This is one of the highest values for bathroom tissue currently on the market, as demonstrated in the above table.
The tensile strength of this same paper in the cross direction lies at around 208 N/m.
In terms of tensile strength of each sheet in the cross direction, the product marketed in Germany under the trade name “Hakle Ultra Care” by Kimberly-Clark has a cross direction strength of about 283 N/m, which value is considered to be very high. By contrast, this paper has a machine direction strength of about 593 N/m.
Thus, the present invention displays exceptional tensile strength both machine and cross directions, together with other characteristics particularly the characteristic relating to the coefficient KNOVE.
The characteristic relating to the tensile strength obtained according to the invention, which may or may not be combined with other characteristics, is favorable to allowing just one sheet to be used at a time, rather than several as has been the case hitherto.
Surprisingly and unexpectedly, the aforementioned strengths do not in any way diminish the softness of the product obtained, or its flexibility. The above table shows the improvement that the inventor has made in this area.
The preferred thickness exceeds 0.75 mm and is preferentially less than 1.5 mm while the basis weight is higher than about 70 g/m2 and preferably lower than 150 g/m2.
These values, which are high by comparison with most known products, heighten the “use one” nature of how the product is consumed.
In order to encourage sheet by sheet use still further, in the case of bathroom tissue, a size of 140 mm×110 mm is preferred. This dimension is somewhat larger than the usual size.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the absorbent sheets are joined together by precuts and together form a roll.
Given the intrinsic characteristics of the sheets as explained hereinabove in particular, the precut ratio may be chosen at about 0.15 per mm. This ratio allows each sheet to be separated easily and reliably.
In the case of an application to bathroom tissue, since the invention advantageously makes it possible to use just one sheet at a time, rolls comprising a lower number of sheets, that is to say between 60 and 120 rather than the customary 150, are formed; this reduction not in any way being penalizing to the user.
Furthermore, surprisingly and unexpectedly, the plies that form the sheets according to the invention do not separate from one another while the rolls are being formed. This seems in particular to be due to their good association and their good flexibility and elasticity.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the sheets may be stacked, then possibly wrapped to form packets.
Advantageously, according to the embodiment illustrated in
More specifically, the specific pressure needs to be constant over the entire developed surface area of the first cylinder 51 in order in particular to reduce cylinder vibration and therefore wear.
Depending on the final characteristics and nature of the sheet obtained, the specific pressure may vary from 3 to 16 kg/mm2.
By way of illustration, sheets comprising 9 plies have been manufactured in accordance with the invention. Their basis weight is about 150 g/m2 and their thickness is about 1 mm. The specific pressure at the marrying device was therefore about 11 kg/mm2. The corresponding manufacturing process was carried out using an installation as depicted schematically in
The multi-ply absorbent sheet according to the invention may comprise only plies formed in this way, which are ultimately associated with one another in accordance with
Without departing from the scope of the invention, the plies may be wet laid using a TAD (through air drying) technique known per se and which consists, in general, in throwing a suspension of papermaking fibers onto a fabric in order to form a web, in transferring this web onto the surface of a porous drying cylinder, in forcing jets of air from said cylinder through the web and then in transferring the dry web thus formed onto a so-called creping cylinder. One or more plies are formed in this way.
Wet laid plies according to the teachings of application EP 1 353 010 may also form part of a sheet according to the invention.
The plies may be associated using an installation according to
The invention is also aimed at sheets comprising both plies obtained according to a conventional (CWP) technique and plies produced using the TAD technique.
The plies of the TAD type may constitute the two outer faces of such sheets. A very soft feel is therefore obtained. The inside plies may be produced using a CWP or some other technique.
Without departing from the scope of the invention, the outer plies may be wet laid using a conventional technique (CWP) and form the two outer faces of the sheet. In this configuration, the inner plies may be produced using a TAD type of technique.
Of course, a combination of plies aimed at producing a sheet that has one face formed of a conventional ply and one face formed using a TAD type technique may also be produced without departing from the scope of the invention.
One of the possible combinations will be chosen according to the particular circumstance, that is to say according to the feel, the absorption, the flexibility mainly desired, or alternatively according to constraints of an economic nature.
Furthermore, it is perfectly conceivable to produce a sheet according to the invention without using adhesive to associate the plies, whatever the nature of each of the plies (or group of plies) of which said sheet is made.
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06290613 | Apr 2006 | EP | regional |
This Application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/297,121, which was entitled “Multi-Ply Disintegratable Absorbent Sheet, Associated Roll and Associated Manufacturing Process” and has been allowed as of Feb. 24, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/297,121 was a National Stage entry of International Application No. PCT/FR2007/000625, filed Apr. 13, 2007, which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 06290613.6, filed on Apr. 14, 2006, the priorities of which are hereby claimed. The disclosures of all prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 901723 | Morse | Oct 1908 | A |
| D40046 | Stone | Jun 1909 | S |
| D40322 | Gair | Oct 1909 | S |
| D40916 | Gair | Sep 1910 | S |
| D63341 | Vandergaw et al. | Nov 1923 | S |
| D66158 | Vandergaw et al. | Dec 1924 | S |
| D66341 | Vandergaw et al. | Dec 1924 | S |
| D78011 | Currier et al. | Mar 1929 | S |
| D78641 | Manus | May 1929 | S |
| 1983813 | Rosen | Dec 1934 | A |
| D104006 | Goodstein | Apr 1937 | S |
| D113598 | Lawson | Feb 1939 | S |
| D118716 | Zito | Jan 1940 | S |
| D127228 | Erhard | May 1941 | S |
| D130965 | Fitch | Dec 1941 | S |
| D154344 | Stapler | Jun 1949 | S |
| D159479 | Feder | Aug 1950 | S |
| 2956564 | Ohara | Oct 1960 | A |
| 3377224 | Gresham et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3581744 | Voss et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3654629 | Crisman et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3738905 | Thomas | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3791082 | Bowling | Feb 1974 | A |
| D243471 | Schroeder | Feb 1977 | S |
| 4009313 | Crawford et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4307141 | Walbrun | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4445693 | Angwin | May 1984 | A |
| 4521166 | Phillips | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4601938 | Deacon et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4759967 | Bauernfeing | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4978565 | Pigneul et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4986329 | Kupchunos | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5114787 | Chaplin et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5173351 | Ruppel et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5289748 | Kuchta et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5325555 | Whitley | Jul 1994 | A |
| D367764 | Makoui et al. | Mar 1996 | S |
| 5795632 | Buchalter | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5809805 | Palmer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5934995 | Morris et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| D414345 | Barnholtz et al. | Sep 1999 | S |
| 5947817 | Morris et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5972456 | Esquivel | Oct 1999 | A |
| D421528 | Shakora | Mar 2000 | S |
| 6036181 | Workman | Mar 2000 | A |
| D425354 | Rogers et al. | May 2000 | S |
| 6106928 | Laurent et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| D436737 | Presutti | Jan 2001 | S |
| 6294036 | Loubinoux et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| D450934 | Duritsch et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
| 6348131 | Kershaw et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6461705 | Eichhorn | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6599614 | Roussel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6727004 | Goulet et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| D494766 | Boerschinger et al. | Aug 2004 | S |
| 6805766 | Roussel et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| D502004 | Olson et al. | Feb 2005 | S |
| 6884492 | Basler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6913530 | Morris et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| D508613 | Knobloch et al. | Aug 2005 | S |
| D510434 | Carlucci et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
| 6979485 | Price et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6991844 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| D518647 | Kressner et al. | Apr 2006 | S |
| D518965 | Enderby | Apr 2006 | S |
| D521250 | Knobloch et al. | May 2006 | S |
| D521251 | Enderby | May 2006 | S |
| 7052234 | Wells et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| D523644 | Knobloch et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
| 7056569 | Price et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7078088 | Price et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| D530520 | Leclere et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
| D535107 | Knobloch et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
| 7208216 | Ackerman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7244064 | Sullivan, Jr. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7247360 | Besner et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7285504 | Jones et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7348067 | Hoffman | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7545971 | Shakespeare | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7662257 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| D612156 | Barredo et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
| D612157 | Barredo et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
| 7846296 | Luu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7914866 | Shannon et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918964 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 20020028230 | Eichhorn et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000665 | Takai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021954 | Graff | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203164 | Healy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215605 | Muller | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040018369 | Goulet et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077471 | Verbruggen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103591 | Chornenky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20060062972 | Lefebvre Du Grosriez et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113049 | Knobloch et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233468 | Jacoby et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233469 | Jacoby et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233470 | Jacoby et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237154 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269706 | Shannon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070122595 | Basler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080044644 | Luu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090120598 | Edwards et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090162597 | Barredo et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100035011 | Graff | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051219 | Barredo | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112264 | Barredo | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170647 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100224338 | Harper et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2238005 | Feb 1974 | DE |
| 0264676 | Apr 1988 | EP |
| 0864014 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1353010 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1400199 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1428654 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1845193 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 2653793 | May 1991 | FR |
| 2775698 | Sep 1999 | FR |
| 9720107 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| 9852745 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 2006027810 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Serach Report and Written Opinion for PCT/FR2007/000625, dated Aug. 21, 2007, pp. 1-14. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2007/000625, dated Dec. 3, 2008, pp. 1-7. |
| United States Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/297,121, dated Dec. 21, 2011, pp. 1-28. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120164426 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12297121 | US | |
| Child | 13408927 | US |
