A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.
A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a pass-band or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.
RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.
RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.
Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.
High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies and bandwidths proposed for future communications networks.
The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. Radio access technology for mobile telephone networks has been standardized by the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). Radio access technology for 5th generation mobile networks is defined in the 5G NR (new radio) standard. The 5G NR standard defines several new communications bands. Two of these new communications bands are n77, which uses the frequency range from 3300 MHz to 4200 MHz, and n79, which uses the frequency range from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz. Both band n77 and band n79 use time-division duplexing (TDD), such that a communications device operating in band n77 and/or band n79 use the same frequencies for both uplink and downlink transmissions. Bandpass filters for bands n77 and n79 must be capable of handling the transmit power of the communications device. WiFi bands at 5 GHz and 6 GHz also require high frequency and wide bandwidth. The 5G NR standard also defines millimeter wave communication bands with frequencies between 24.25 GHz and 40 GHz.
Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.
Description of Apparatus
The XBAR 100 is made up of a thin film conductor pattern formed on a surface of a piezoelectric plate 110 having parallel front and back surfaces 112, 114, respectively. The piezoelectric plate is a thin single-crystal layer of a piezoelectric material such as lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, lanthanum gallium silicate, gallium nitride, or aluminum nitride. The piezoelectric plate is cut such that the orientation of the X, Y, and Z crystalline axes with respect to the front and back surfaces is known and consistent. In the examples presented in this patent, the piezoelectric plates are Z-cut, which is to say the Z axis is normal to the surfaces. However, XBARs may be fabricated on piezoelectric plates with other crystallographic orientations.
The back surface 114 of the piezoelectric plate 110 is attached to a substrate 120 that provides mechanical support to the piezoelectric plate 110. The substrate 120 may be, for example, silicon, sapphire, quartz, or some other material. The piezoelectric plate 110 may be bonded to the substrate 120 using a wafer bonding process, or grown on the substrate 120, or attached to the substrate in some other manner. The piezoelectric plate may be attached directly to the substrate, or may be attached to the substrate via one or more intermediate material layers.
The conductor pattern of the XBAR 100 includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) 130. The IDT 130 includes a first plurality of parallel fingers, such as finger 136, extending from a first busbar 132 and a second plurality of fingers extending from a second busbar 134. The first and second pluralities of parallel fingers are interleaved. The interleaved fingers overlap for a distance AP, commonly referred to as the “aperture” of the IDT. The center-to-center distance L between the outermost fingers of the IDT 130 is the “length” of the IDT.
The first and second busbars 132, 134 serve as the terminals of the XBAR 100. A radio frequency or microwave signal applied between the two busbars 132, 134 of the IDT 130 excites an acoustic wave within the piezoelectric plate 110. As will be discussed in further detail, the excited acoustic wave is a bulk shear wave that propagates in the direction normal to the surface of the piezoelectric plate 110, which is also normal, or transverse, to the direction of the electric field created by the IDT fingers. Thus, the XBAR is considered a transversely-excited film bulk wave resonator.
A cavity 140 is formed in the substrate 120 such that a portion 115 of the piezoelectric plate 110 containing the IDT 130 is suspended over the cavity 140 without contacting the substrate 120. “Cavity” has its conventional meaning of “an empty space within a solid body.” The cavity 140 may be a hole completely through the substrate 120 (as shown in Section A-A and Section B-B) or a recess in the substrate 120 (as shown subsequently in
The portion 115 of the piezoelectric plate suspended over the cavity 140 will be referred to herein as the “diaphragm” (for lack of a better term) due to its physical resemblance to the diaphragm of a microphone. The diaphragm may be continuously and seamlessly connected to the rest of the piezoelectric plate 110 around all, or nearly all, of perimeter of the cavity 140.
For ease of presentation in
A front-side dielectric layer 214 may optionally be formed on the front side of the piezoelectric plate 110. The “front side” of the XBAR is, by definition, the surface facing away from the substrate. The front-side dielectric layer 214 has a thickness tfd. The front-side dielectric layer 214 is formed between the IDT fingers 238. Although not shown in
The IDT fingers 238 may be aluminum or a substantially aluminum alloy, copper or a substantially copper alloy, beryllium, gold, or some other conductive material. Thin (relative to the total thickness of the conductors) layers of other metals, such as chromium or titanium, may be formed under and/or over the fingers to improve adhesion between the fingers and the piezoelectric plate 110 and/or to passivate or encapsulate the fingers. The busbars (132, 134 in
Dimension p is the center-to-center spacing or “pitch” of the IDT fingers, which may be referred to as the pitch of the IDT and/or the pitch of the XBAR. Dimension w is the width or “mark” of the IDT fingers. The IDT of an XBAR differs substantially from the IDTs used in surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators. In a SAW resonator, the pitch of the IDT is one-half of the acoustic wavelength at the resonance frequency. Additionally, the mark-to-pitch ratio of a SAW resonator IDT is typically close to 0.5 (i.e. the mark or finger width is about one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance). In an XBAR, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the width w of the fingers. In addition, the pitch p of the IDT is typically 2 to 20 times the thickness is of the piezoelectric slab 212. The width of the IDT fingers in an XBAR is not constrained to one-fourth of the acoustic wavelength at resonance. For example, the width of XBAR IDT fingers may be 500 nm or greater, such that the IDT can be fabricated using optical lithography. The thickness tm of the IDT fingers may be from 100 nm to about equal to the width w. The thickness of the busbars (132, 134 in
The XBAR 300 shown in
Considering
An acoustic resonator based on shear acoustic wave resonances can achieve better performance than current state-of-the art film-bulk-acoustic-resonators (FBAR) and solidly-mounted-resonator bulk-acoustic-wave (SMR BAW) devices where the electric field is applied in the thickness direction. In such devices, the acoustic mode is compressive with atomic motions and the direction of acoustic energy flow in the thickness direction. In addition, the piezoelectric coupling for shear wave XBAR resonances can be high (>20%) compared to other acoustic resonators. Thus, high piezoelectric coupling enables the design and implementation of microwave and millimeter-wave filters with appreciable bandwidth.
The filter 500 may include a substrate having a surface, a single-crystal piezoelectric plate having parallel front and back surfaces, and an acoustic Bragg reflector sandwiched between the surface of the substrate and the back surface of the single-crystal piezoelectric plate. The substrate, acoustic Bragg reflector, and piezoelectric plate are represented by the rectangle 510 in
In a ladder filter, such as the filter 500, the resonance frequencies of shunt resonators are typically lower than the resonance frequencies of series resonators. The resonance frequency of an SM XBAR resonator is determined, in part, by IDT pitch. IDT pitch also impacts other filter parameters including impedance and power handling capability. For broad-band filter applications, it may not be practical to provide the required difference between the resonance frequencies of shunt and series resonators using only differences in IDT pitch.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,601,392, a first dielectric layer (represented by the dashed rectangle 525) having a first thickness t1 may be deposited over the IDTs of some or all of the shunt resonators 520A, 520B, 520C. A second dielectric layer (represented by the dashed rectangle 515) having a second thickness t2, less than t1, may be deposited over the IDTs of the series resonators 510A, 510B, 510C, 510D. The second dielectric layer may be deposited over both the shunt and series resonators. The difference between the thickness t1 and the thickness t2 defines a frequency offset between the series and shunt resonators. Individual series or shunt resonators may be tuned to different frequencies by varying the pitch of the respective IDTs. In some filters, more than two dielectric layers of different thicknesses may be used as described in co-pending application Ser. No. 16/924,108.
Alternatively or additionally, the shunt resonators 510A, 510B, 510C, 510D may be formed on a piezoelectric plate having a thickness t3 and the series resonators may be fabricated on a piezoelectric plate having a thickness t4 less than t3. The difference between the thicknesses t3 and t4 defines a frequency offset between the series and shunt resonators. Individual series or shunt resonators may be tuned to different frequencies by varying the pitch of the respective IDTs. In some filters, three or more different piezoelectric plate thicknesses may be used to provide additional frequency tuning capability.
The second dielectric layer 655 may also serve to seal and passivate the surface of the filter 600A. The second dielectric layer may be the same material as the first dielectric layer or a different material. The second dielectric layer may be a laminate of two or more sub-layers of different materials. Alternatively, an additional dielectric passivation layer (not shown in
The diplexer 700 includes a low band filter 710 and a high band filter 720. The low band filter 710 has a passband that is lower in frequency and does not overlap a passband of the high band filter 720. Both the low band filter 710 and the high band filter 720 may be implemented using XBARs connected in ladder filter circuits as shown in
The multiplexer 750 includes a low band filter 760, a high band filter 770, and one or more mid band filter 780. In this context, “high” and “low” are relative terms. The high band filter 770 has the highest frequency passband of any of the filters in the multiplexer. Similarly, the low band filter 760 has the lowest frequency passband of any of the filters in the multiplexer. The one or more mid band filters 780 have pass band intermediate the passbands of the high and low band filters. The passbands of the filters do not overlap in frequency. The low band filter 760, the high band filter 770, and the one or more mid band filters 780 may be implemented using XBARs connected in ladder filter circuits as shown in
The solid curve 810 is a plot of the magnitude of admittance versus frequency for a shunt resonator in the low band filter of the diplexer. The resonance frequency of this shunt resonator is just below the lower edge of the low band. The dashed curve 820 is a plot of the magnitude of admittance versus frequency for a series resonator in the low band filter of the diplexer. The resonance frequency of this series resonator is just above the upper edge of the low band.
The dash-dot curve 830 is a plot of the magnitude of admittance versus frequency for a shunt resonator in the high band filter of the diplexer. The resonance frequency of this shunt resonator is just below the lower edge of the high band. The solid curve 840 is a plot of the magnitude of admittance versus frequency for a series resonator in the high band filter of the diplexer. The resonance frequency of this series resonator is just above the upper edge of the high band.
Depending on the frequencies of the low band and the high band, it may not be possible to fabricate the shunt and series XBARs of both the high and low band filters on a single piezoelectric plate thickness. For example, consider a diplexer for 5G NR (5th generation new radio) bands n77 (3300 MHz to 4200 MHz) and n79 (4400 MHz to 5000 MHz). The difference between the resonance frequency of the low band shunt resonator (curve 810) and the anti-resonance frequency of the high band series resonator (curve 840) is about 2 GHz. This frequency difference cannot be achieved on a single diaphragm thickness and is difficult to achieve with only two diaphragm thicknesses.
While
The use of two shunt resonators and three series resonators for each of low and high band filters is exemplary. Either filter may have more or fewer than two shunt resonators, more or fewer than three series resonators, and more or fewer than five total resonators. Port 1 connects to the low band filter 1015, port 3 connects to the high band filter 1035, and port 2 is the common port.
The diplexer 1000 is implemented with XBARs with three or more different diaphragm thicknesses similar to the filter 900 shown in
The use of two shunt resonators and three series resonators for each of low, mid, and high band filters is exemplary. Each filter may have more or fewer than two shunt resonators, more or fewer than three series resonators, and more or fewer than five total resonators. Port 1 connects to the low band filter 1015, port 2 connects to the high band filter 1035, and port 3 connects to the mid band filter. All three filters connect to the common port.
The multiplexer 1100 is implemented with XBARs with three or more different diaphragm thicknesses similar to the filter 900 shown in
Description of Methods
View B illustrates selective removal to thin selected portions of the piezoelectric plate. Selected portions of the piezoelectric plate may be thinned, for example, to provide diaphragms for series resonators as previously shown in
View C illustrates a piezoelectric plate 1210 with three different thicknesses bonded to a substrate 1220. The piezoelectric plate 1210 has an original surface 1260 and two recesses 1262, 1264 with different thicknesses formed by removing material as shown in view B. The process 1200 may be used to form areas on the piezoelectric plate with more than three different thicknesses. Cavities may then be formed under portions of these areas to provide diaphragms with three different thicknesses. The process 1200 is exemplary and other different processes and methods may be used to create multiple thickness regions on a piezoelectric plate. The process 1200 is not limited to three different thicknesses and may be used to create piezoelectric plates with areas having four or more different thicknesses.
While
The flow chart of
The piezoelectric plate may be, for example, lithium niobate or lithium tantalate, either of which may be Z-cut, rotated Z-cut, or rotated YX-cut. The piezoelectric plate may be some other material and/or some other cut. The device substrate may preferably be silicon. The device substrate may be some other material that allows formation of deep cavities by etching or other processing.
In one variation of the process 1300, one or more cavities are formed in the device substrate at 1310A, before the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the substrate at 1315. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using conventional photolithographic and etching techniques. Typically, the cavities formed at 1310A will not penetrate through the device substrate, and the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
At 1315, the piezoelectric plate is bonded to the device substrate. The piezoelectric plate and the device substrate may be bonded by a wafer bonding process. Typically, the mating surfaces of the device substrate and the piezoelectric plate are highly polished. One or more layers of intermediate materials, such as an oxide or metal, may be formed or deposited on the mating surface of one or both of the piezoelectric plate and the device substrate. One or both mating surfaces may be activated using, for example, a plasma process. The mating surfaces may then be pressed together with considerable force to establish molecular bonds between the piezoelectric plate and the device substrate or intermediate material layers.
At 1320, the sacrificial substrate may be removed. For example, the piezoelectric plate and the sacrificial substrate may be a wafer of piezoelectric material that has been ion implanted to create defects in the crystal structure along a plane that defines a boundary between what will become the piezoelectric plate and the sacrificial substrate. At 1320, the wafer may be split along the defect plane, for example by thermal shock, detaching the sacrificial substrate and leaving the piezoelectric plate bonded to the device substrate. The exposed surface of the piezoelectric plate may be polished or processed in some manner after the sacrificial substrate is detached.
Thin plates of single-crystal piezoelectric materials laminated to a non-piezoelectric substrate are commercially available. At the time of this application, both lithium niobate and lithium tantalate plates are available bonded to various substrates including silicon, quartz, and fused silica. Thin plates of other piezoelectric materials may be available now or in the future. The thickness of the piezoelectric plate may be between 300 nm and 1000 nm. When the substrate is silicon, a layer of SiO2 may be disposed between the piezoelectric plate and the substrate. When a commercially available piezoelectric plate/device substrate laminate is used, steps 1310A, 1315, and 1320 of the process 1300 are not performed.
At 1330, selected areas of the piezoelectric plate are thinned. For example, areas of the piezoelectric plate that will become the diaphragms of series resonators may be thinned as shown in
The surface remaining after material is removed from the piezoelectric plate may be damaged, particularly if an ion mill or sputter etch tool is used at 1330. Some form of post processing, such as annealing or other thermal process may be performed at 1335 to repair the damaged surface.
After the piezoelectric plate is selectively thinned at 1330 and any surface damage is repaired at 1335, a first conductor pattern, including IDTs of each XBAR, is formed at 1345 by depositing and patterning one or more conductor layers on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The conductor layer may be, for example, aluminum, an aluminum alloy, copper, a copper alloy, or some other conductive metal. Optionally, one or more layers of other materials may be disposed below (i.e. between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate) and/or on top of the conductor layer. For example, a thin film of titanium, chrome, or other metal may be used to improve the adhesion between the conductor layer and the piezoelectric plate. A second conductor pattern of gold, aluminum, copper or other higher conductivity metal may be formed over portions of the first conductor pattern (for example the IDT bus bars and interconnections between the IDTs).
Each conductor pattern may be formed at 1345 by depositing the conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other metal layers in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The excess metal may then be removed by etching through patterned photoresist. The conductor layer can be etched, for example, by plasma etching, reactive ion etching, wet chemical etching, or other etching techniques.
Alternatively, each conductor pattern may be formed at 1345 using a lift-off process. Photoresist may be deposited over the piezoelectric plate. and patterned to define the conductor pattern. The conductor layer and, optionally, one or more other layers may be deposited in sequence over the surface of the piezoelectric plate. The photoresist may then be removed, which removes the excess material, leaving the conductor pattern.
At 1350, one or more frequency setting dielectric layer(s) may be formed by depositing one or more layers of dielectric material on the front side of the piezoelectric plate. The one or more dielectric layers may be deposited using a conventional deposition technique such as physical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, chemical vapor deposition, or some other method. One or more lithography processes (using photomasks) may be used to limit the deposition of the dielectric layers to selected areas of the piezoelectric plate. For example, a mask may be used to limit a dielectric layer to cover only selected resonators.
At 1355, a passivation/tuning dielectric layer is deposited over the piezoelectric plate and conductor patterns. The passivation/tuning dielectric layer may cover the entire surface of the filter except for pads for electrical connections to circuitry external to the filter. In some instantiations of the process 1300, the passivation/tuning dielectric layer may be formed after the cavities in the device substrate are etched at either 1310B or 1310C.
In a second variation of the process 1300, one or more cavities are formed in the back side of the device substrate at 1310B. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities may be formed using an anisotropic or orientation-dependent dry or wet etch to open holes through the back side of the device substrate to the piezoelectric plate. In this case, the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
In a third variation of the process 1300, one or more cavities in the form of recesses in the device substrate may be formed at 1310C by etching the substrate using an etchant introduced through openings in the piezoelectric plate. A separate cavity may be formed for each resonator in a filter device. The one or more cavities formed at 1310C will not penetrate through the device substrate, and the resulting resonator devices will have a cross-section as shown in
Ideally, after the cavities are formed at 1310B or 1310C, most or all of the filter devices on a wafer will meet a set of performance requirements. However, normal process tolerances will result in variations in parameters such as the thicknesses of dielectric layer formed at 1350 and 1355, variations in the thickness and line widths of conductors and IDT fingers formed at 1345, and variations in the thickness of the PZT plate. These variations contribute to deviations of the filter device performance from the set of performance requirements.
To improve the yield of filter devices meeting the performance requirements, frequency tuning may be performed by selectively adjusting the thickness of the passivation/tuning layer deposited over the resonators at 1355. The frequency of a filter device passband can be lowered by adding material to the passivation/tuning layer, and the frequency of the filter device passband can be increased by removing material to the passivation/tuning layer. Typically, the process 1300 is biased to produce filter devices with passbands that are initially lower than a required frequency range but can be tuned to the desired frequency range by removing material from the surface of the passivation/tuning layer.
At 1360, a probe card or other means may be used to make electrical connections with the filter to allow radio frequency (RF) tests and measurements of filter characteristics such as input-output transfer function. Typically, RF measurements are made on all, or a large portion, of the filter devices fabricated simultaneously on a common piezoelectric plate and substrate.
At 1365, global frequency tuning may be performed by removing material from the surface of the passivation/tuning layer using a selective material removal tool such as, for example, a scanning ion mill as previously described. “Global” tuning is performed with a spatial resolution equal to or larger than an individual filter device. The objective of global tuning is to move the passband of each filter device towards a desired frequency range. The test results from 1360 may be processed to generate a global contour map indicating the amount of material to be removed as a function of two-dimensional position on the wafer. The material is then removed in accordance with the contour map using the selective material removal tool.
At 1370, local frequency tuning may be performed in addition to, or instead of, the global frequency tuning performed at 1365. “Local” frequency tuning is performed with a spatial resolution smaller than an individual filter device. The test results from 1360 may be processed to generate a map indicating the amount of material to be removed at each filter device. Local frequency tuning may require the use of a mask to restrict the size of the areas from which material is removed. For example, a first mask may be used to restrict tuning to only shunt resonators, and a second mask may be subsequently used to restrict tuning to only series resonators (or vice versa). This would allow independent tuning of the lower band edge (by tuning shunt resonators) and upper band edge (by tuning series resonators) of the filter devices.
After frequency tuning at 1365 and/or 1370, the filter device is completed at 1375. Actions that may occur at 1375 include forming bonding pads or solder bumps or other means for making connection between the device and external circuitry (if such pads were not formed at 1345); excising individual filter devices from a wafer containing multiple filter devices; other packaging steps; and additional testing. After each filter device is completed, the process ends at 1395.
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
The patent claims priority to the following provisional patent applications: application 63/040,435, titled MONOLITHIC MULTI-PORT XBAR, filed Jun. 17, 2020. This patent is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 16/988,213, filed Aug. 7, 2020, entitled TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATORS WITH MULTIPLE DIAPHRAGM THICKNESSES AND FABRICATION METHOD, which claims priority to the following provisional patent applications: application 62/892,980, titled XBAR FABRICATION, filed Aug. 28, 2019; and application 62/904,152, titled DIELECTRIC OVERLAYER TRIMMING FOR FREQUENCY CONTROL, filed Sep. 23, 2019. Application Ser. No. 16/988,213 is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 16/438,121, filed Jun. 11, 2019, entitled TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,756,697, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 16/230,443, filed Dec. 21, 2018, entitled TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,192, which claims priority from the following provisional patent applications: application 62/685,825, filed Jun. 15, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FBAR (XBAR); application 62/701,363, filed Jul. 20, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FBAR (XBAR); application 62/741,702, filed Oct. 5, 2018, entitled 5 GHZ LATERALLY-EXCITED BULK WAVE RESONATOR (XBAR); application 62/748,883, filed Oct. 22, 2018, entitled SHEAR-MODE FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR; and application 62/753,815, filed Oct. 31, 2018, entitled LITHIUM TANTALATE SHEAR-MODE FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5446330 | Eda et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5552655 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726610 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5853601 | Krishaswamy | Dec 1998 | A |
6377140 | Ehara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516503 | Ikada et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540827 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6707229 | Martin | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6710514 | Ikada et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7042132 | Bauer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7345400 | Nakao et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7463118 | Jacobsen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7535152 | Ogami et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7684109 | Godshalk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7728483 | Tanaka | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7868519 | Umeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7939987 | Solal et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7941103 | Iwamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8278802 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294330 | Abbott et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8344815 | Yamanaka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8816567 | Zuo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829766 | Milyutin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8932686 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9093979 | Wang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9112134 | Takahashi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9130145 | Martin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9219466 | Meltaus et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9240768 | Nishihara et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9276557 | Nordquist et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9369105 | Li | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9425765 | Rinaldi | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9525398 | Olsson | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9640750 | Nakanishi et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9748923 | Kando et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9762202 | Thalmayr et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9780759 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9837984 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10079414 | Guyette et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10187039 | Komatsu et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10200013 | Bower et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10211806 | Bhattacharjee | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10284176 | Solal | May 2019 | B1 |
10491192 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10601392 | Plesski et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10637438 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10644674 | Takamine | May 2020 | B2 |
10756697 | Plesski et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10790802 | Yantchev et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10797675 | Plesski | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819309 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10826462 | Plesski et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10868510 | Yantchev | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868512 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10917070 | Plesski et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10985728 | Plesski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11146232 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11201601 | Yantchev et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11418167 | Garcia | Aug 2022 | B2 |
20020079986 | Ruby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020158714 | Kaitila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189062 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030080831 | Naumenko et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030199105 | Kub et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040041496 | Imai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100164 | Murata | May 2004 | A1 |
20040207033 | Koshido | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207485 | Kawachi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261250 | Kadota et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050099091 | Mishima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050185026 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218488 | Matsuo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050264136 | Tsutsumi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060131731 | Sato | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179642 | Kawamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070182510 | Park | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188047 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194863 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070267942 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070296304 | Fujii et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080246559 | Ayazi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100064492 | Tanaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102669 | Yamanaka | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100123367 | Tai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100212127 | Heinze et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223999 | Onoe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301703 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018389 | Fukano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018654 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110102107 | Onzuka | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109196 | Goto | May 2011 | A1 |
20110199163 | Yamanaka | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110278993 | Iwamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120286900 | Kadota et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130057360 | Meltaus et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130207747 | Nishii et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234805 | Takahashi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271238 | Onda | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278609 | Stephanou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321100 | Wang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140009032 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140113571 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140130319 | Iwamoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145556 | Kadota | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151151 | Reinhardt | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152145 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173862 | Kando et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225684 | Kando et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150042417 | Onodera et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150244149 | Van Someren | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150319537 | Perois et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150333730 | Meltaus | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160028367 | Shealy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036415 | Ikeuchi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049920 | Kishino | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160079958 | Burak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160149554 | Nakagawa | May 2016 | A1 |
20160182009 | Bhattacharjee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160285430 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170063332 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170179928 | Raihn et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187352 | Omura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170201232 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214381 | Bhattacharjee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214387 | Burak et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222617 | Mizoguchi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170222622 | Solal et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170264266 | Kishimoto | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290160 | Takano et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170359050 | Irieda et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370791 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005950 | Watanabe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013400 | Ito et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013405 | Takata | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180026603 | Iwamoto | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033952 | Yamamoto | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180062615 | Kato et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180062617 | Yun et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180123016 | Gong | May 2018 | A1 |
20180152169 | Goto et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180191322 | Chang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212589 | Meltaus et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180316333 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190007022 | Goto et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190068155 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068164 | Houlden et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190123721 | Takamine | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131953 | Gong | May 2019 | A1 |
20190181833 | Nosaka | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190207583 | Miura et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190245518 | Ito | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190273480 | Lin | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190348966 | Campanella-Pineda | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190386638 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200021272 | Segovia Fernandez et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200036357 | Mimura | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200228087 | Michigami et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200235719 | Yantchev et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200295729 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200304091 | Yantchev | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321939 | Turner et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328728 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210273631 | Jachowski et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210313951 | Yandrapalli et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210328575 | Hammond et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220103160 | Jachowski et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220116015 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220123720 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220123723 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220149808 | Dyer et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220149814 | Garcia et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
113765495 | Dec 2021 | CN |
H10209804 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2001244785 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002300003 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003078389 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004096677 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004129222 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004304622 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006173557 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007251910 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2010062816 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010103803 | May 2010 | JP |
2010233210 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013528996 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013214954 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2015054986 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2016001923 | Jan 2016 | JP |
2017526254 | Sep 2017 | JP |
2017220910 | Dec 2017 | JP |
2018093487 | Jun 2018 | JP |
2018166259 | Oct 2018 | JP |
2018207144 | Dec 2018 | JP |
2019186655 | Oct 2019 | JP |
2020113939 | Jul 2020 | JP |
2010047114 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2013021948 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2015098694 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2016017104 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016052129 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016147687 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017188342 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018003273 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018163860 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2019138810 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2020092414 | May 2020 | WO |
2020100744 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited).” 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8. |
R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SH0 Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190. |
M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages. |
Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2. |
Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 Ghz Lithium Niobate Mems Resonators With High Fom of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019. |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020. |
G. Manohar, “Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA, Jan. 2012, 7 pages. |
Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A.. (2006). Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BEM simulation. 1474-1477. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371. |
Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Y-cut X-propagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. I, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi:10.1002/ecja.4410690406. |
Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003). |
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/45654 dated Oct. 29, 2020. |
Buchanan “Ceramit Materials for Electronics” 3rd Edition, first published in 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 496 (Year 2004). Jan. 2004. |
Sorokin et al. Study of Microwave Acoustic Attenuation in a Multi-frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on a Synthetic Diamond Single Crystal Published in Acoustical Physics, vol. 61, No. 6, 2015 pp. 675 (Year 2015) Jan. 2015. |
Zou, Jie “High-Performance Aluminum Nitride Lamb Wave Resonators for RF Front-End Technology” University of California, Berkeley, Summer 2015, pp. 63 (Year 2015) Jan. 2015. |
Santosh, G. , Surface acoustic wave devices on silicon using patterned and thin film ZnO, Ph.D. thesis, Feb. 2016, Indian Institute of technology Guwahati, Assam, India Feb. 2016. |
Kadota et al. “5.4 Ghz Lamb Wave Resonator on LiNbO3 Thin Crystal Plate and Its Application,” published in Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50 (2011) 07HD11. (Year: 2011) 2011. |
Safari et al. “Piezoelectric for Transducer Applications” published by Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 4 (Year: 2000). 2020. |
Moussa et al. Review on Triggered Liposomal Drug Delivery with a Focus on Ultrasound 2015, Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 16 (Year 2005) 2005. |
Acoustic Properties of Solids ONDA Corporation 592 Weddell Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Apr. 11, 2003, pp. 5 (Year 2003). 2003. |
Bahreyni, B. Fabrication and Design of Resonant Microdevices Andrew William, Inc. 2018, NY (Year 2008). 2008. |
Material Properties of Tibtech Innovations, © 2018 Tibtech Innovations (Year 2018). 2018. |
Namdeo et al. “Simulation on Effects of Electrical Loading due to Interdigital Transducers in Surface Acoustic Wave Resonator”, published in Procedia Engineering 64 ( 2013) of Science Direct pp. 322-330 (Year: 2013) 2013. |
Rodriguez-Madrid et al., “Super-High-Frequency SAW Resonators on AIN/Diamond”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 495-497. Year: 2012) 2012. |
Webster Dictionary, Meaning of “diaphragm” Merriam Webster since 1828. 1828. |
A. C. Guyette, “Theory and Design of Intrinsically Switched Multiplexers With Optimum Phase Linearity,” in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 3254-3264, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2274963. Sep. 2013. |
Yanson Yang, Ruochen Lu, Songbin Gong, High Q Antisymmetric Mode Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With Spurious Mitigation, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, Apr. 2020. Apr. 2, 2020. |
Yu-Po Wong, Luyan Qiu, Naoto Matsuoka, Ken-ya Hashimoto, Broadband Piston Mode Operation for First-order Antisymmetric Mode Resonators, 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2020. Sep. 2020. |
Chen et al., “Development and Application of SAW Filter,” Micromachines, Apr. 20, 2022, vol. 13, No. 656, pp. 1-15. |
Hermann et al., “Properties of shear-horizontal surface acoustic waves in different layered quartz-SiO2 structures,” Ultrasonics, 1999, vol. 37, pp. 335-341. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2022/081068, dated Apr. 18, 2023, 17 pages. |
Lam et al., “A Review of Lame and Lamb Mode Crystal Resonators for Timing Applications and Prospects of Lame and Lamb Mode Piezo MEMS Resonators for Filtering Applications,” 2018 International Symposium on Acoustic Wave Devices for Future Mobile Communication Systems, Mar. 6-7, 2018, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210067133 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63040435 | Jun 2020 | US | |
62904152 | Sep 2019 | US | |
62892980 | Aug 2019 | US | |
62753815 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62748883 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62741702 | Oct 2018 | US | |
62701363 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62685825 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16988213 | Aug 2020 | US |
Child | 17094569 | US | |
Parent | 16438121 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 16988213 | US | |
Parent | 16230443 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16438121 | US |