The field of the invention is downhole valves that can provide bi-directional fluid flow, as well as to prevent fluid loss into the formation and can be opened using only surface pressure to allow production and more particularly valves that can be operated from the surface by pressure so that a surface rig is not needed to stop the possibility of production or fluid loss to the formation.
Completions in low pressure formations involve a risk of fluid loss into the formation. In these instances the hydrostatic pressure from the liquid column in the production string is higher than the formation pressure. A fluid loss valve selectively keeps the fluid in the production string from flowing into the formation and potentially decreasing its subsequent ability to produce hydrocarbons from the formation. On the other hand, when the formation needs to be produced, the valve must be opened to allow the formation a path to the surface through the production tubing.
In the past, packer assemblies have come with valves that can be opened with production string manipulation. In some cases the manipulation involved up and down cycling to operate a downhole j-slot mechanism to change the position of a valve associated with a packer to either and open or a closed position with an exit from the j-slot being available to pull the string out of the hole. One example of such a design is U.S. Pat. No. 5,826,652. Another mechanically manipulated valve for controlling fluid loss involves a stinger on the bottom of the production string that can be engaged to a sliding sleeve valve to set it in an open or closed position with string manipulation. This product is available from Baker Oil Tools under the product name Reservoir Control Valve Product Family H68406. J-slot valves of various types are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,529,126; 6,889,771 and 7,090,020.
In both instances, the mechanical string manipulation that it takes to operate these valves requires the use of a rig. The cost of a rig is very high and the present invention allows the provision of a fluid loss valve that can be operational to prevent loss to the formation and can then be disabled as the formation is allowed to come into the production string. The positions can be achieved with pressure rather than tubing string manipulation. A flapper and a sliding sleeve provide a dual closure to prevent fluid loss. Pressure operation manipulates a sleeve to an open position and the formation coming in moves the flapper out of the way. These and other features of the invention will be more apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and associated drawings that appear below, while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is measured by the appended claims.
A downhole valve features a flow port that can be selectively obstructed by a pressure actuated sleeve that is movable in a pin and slot mechanism to rotate while being cycled up and down by application and removal of pressure in a cyclical manner. When the sleeve is cycled to the port closed position, a flapper mounted near its upper end can fall on a seat on the sleeve to prevent fluid in the tubular string into the formation from returning down into the formation as would be the case, for example, where an electric, mechanical or hydraulic pump above the valve had been taking fluid from the formation, and had been turned off. The closed flapper allows pressure to cycle the sleeve. A double closure against fluid loss can be affected.
Inside of tube 18 is a sleeve 24. Seals 26 and 28 can be either mounted to the inner wall 30 of tube 18 or they can be carried on the sleeve 24. In
The way the sleeve 24 is pushed down with pressure applied from connection 14 is that a flapper 38 sits on a seat 40 and is pivotally mounted to the sleeve 24 at pivot 42. The weight of the flapper 38, as well as a spring on its hinge, makes the flapper fall against the seat 40 when there is no flow through the housing 10 because the ports 22 are closed by sleeve 24, as shown in
With the flapper 38 on its seat 40 pressure is applied to it from the surface through connection 14. The application of pressure forces the sleeve 24 down and compresses spring 34. Some leakage past the seat 40 can be tolerated as long as the applied force is high enough to overcome spring 34. Alternatively, it can be a complete seal to create a double closure. When pressure is removed the sleeve 24 can move up from the force of spring 34 while the j-slot mechanism 36 causes sleeve 24 to rotate on its axis as a pin follows a curved slot pattern. After enough cycles of pressurizing and removal of pressure onto flapper 38 a final release of pressure allows a pin to go into an elongated slot in the j-slot assembly 36 to allow the sleeve to rise to a higher elevation, shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiment shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the valve of the present invention allows for a temporary closure to allow pressurizing from uphole to get the valve into its needed position coupled with a feature that allows flow uphole while pushing aside the temporary barrier that allowed pressure operation of the valve from the surface. In the preferred embodiment the temporary barrier is a flapper that flow from the formation rotates to open leaving the flapper out of the flow path and giving a full bore opening for production or passage of other tools. Optionally, the flapper 38 can be locked open or closed with ports 22 either open or closed, all depending on what the desired final position of the ports 22 is desired.
Other variations include a removeable sleeve and flapper (by wireline, coiled tubing or tubing means) that would allow these parts to be taken to surface and repaired/replaced as needed, and also the use of a wireline profile nipple and plug at position 20. With the sleeve and flapper removed, the plug in the bottom of 20 could then be removed to allow workover of the well by passing tools completely through the valve.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3763932 | Dinning | Oct 1973 | A |
3783893 | Davison | Jan 1974 | A |
4105069 | Baker | Aug 1978 | A |
4216830 | Fredd | Aug 1980 | A |
4478286 | Fineberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4688593 | Pringle et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5529126 | Edwards | Jun 1996 | A |
5826652 | Tapp | Oct 1998 | A |
5947205 | Shy | Sep 1999 | A |
6085845 | Patel et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119783 | Parker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6152224 | French | Nov 2000 | A |
6189354 | Spath | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6230807 | Patel | May 2001 | B1 |
6662877 | Patel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6732803 | Garcia et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6763892 | Kaszuba | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6810087 | Hoctor et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834722 | Vacik et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6889771 | Leising et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6948561 | Myron | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7066264 | Bissonnette et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090020 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7152678 | Turner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20030121665 | Trott et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040118562 | George | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040144546 | Read, Jr. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050236154 | Tudor et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060169465 | Hejl et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080029273 | Pia | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03054347 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2007091055 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080196898 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |